Forward policy (Sino-Indian conflict)

Last updated

Forward policy was a term coined by the Indian Army to refer to the Indian government directive of establishing "forward" posts (advance posts) [1] to reclaim disputed territory occupied by China. The Dhola Post in particular became a trigger leading up to the 1962 Sino-Indian War. The term has also been used to describe China's and Britain's Tibet policies in the early 1900s.

Contents

Colonial era forward policies

Wendy Palace, a member of the Tibet Society at the University of Cambridge, described the 1903 British expedition to Tibet, which was spearheaded by the government of India under the British Raj, as one of the most extreme examples of forward policy on India's frontiers. [2] While London viewed Tibet under the wider context of its relations with China and Russia and was thus reluctant to provoke the two powers unnecessarily, Lord Curzon of the British Indian government was more eager to protect its commercial interests, such as trade routes crossing the Himalayas. [3] China reacted with its own forward policy to reinforce control but was often held back by internal and external turmoils. [4] [5] Kapileshwar Labh believes that due to China's then push into British India and the Himalayan states of Nepal, Sikkim, and Bhutan, India's reactionary and defensive forward policy during the later half of the century was conceptualized. [6]

Sino-Indian War

Jammu and Kashmir (National Geographic, 1946) Jammu and Kashmir in 1946 map of India by National Geographic.jpg
Jammu and Kashmir (National Geographic, 1946)
Jammu and Kashmir (Survey of India, 1954) Jammu and Kashmir in 1954 Political Map of India.jpg
Jammu and Kashmir (Survey of India, 1954)
The Jammu and Kashmir border of the Republic of China, 1947 1947 ROC claim line in Ladakh.jpg
The Jammu and Kashmir border of the Republic of China, 1947
The 'forward policy': Indian posts in blue, Chinese posts in red 1963-Colombo-proposal-for-Aksai-Chin.jpg
The 'forward policy': Indian posts in blue, Chinese posts in red

Forward policy with respect to India refers to political and military decisions taken in the early 1950s onwards, but it usually specifically refers to the policy adopted in late 1961 in the context of Jawaharlal Nehru, the Sino India border relations and the 1962 war. The forward policy adopted on 2 November 1961 and [7] [8] has been used to explain and justify the Sino-Indian War, which was launched by China in October 1962. [9] [10] While the Henderson Brooks–Bhagat Report opined that the 1962 war was triggered by India's forward policy, [11] other views occur such as that of Bertil Lintner, who blames events in 1959, specifically the escape of the Dalai Lama from Lhasa, Tibet, to India. [12] Until 1971, Intelligence Bureau Director Mullik positively had advocated the forward policy decision made by Nehru. [13] The Intelligence Bureau had a forward policy in place in 1959. [14] The term "forward policy" was also used in government documents but was a misnomer or seen in the incorrect context of Indian expansionism. The policy did not imply expansionism but was a defensive policy based on perceived external aggression by pushing back an external aggressor from one's own territory. [10]

Nehru's forward policy was an attempt to break the deadlock that Chinese-Indian relations had reached in 1961. A deadlocked created by events in Tibet causes border clashes, which resulted in fatalities, India's perceived helplessness against Chinese border developments was exacerbated by international and mounting domestic pressure. [15] [7] On 5 December 1961 orders went to the Eastern and Western commands: [16] [17]

[...] We are to patrol as far forward as possible from our present positions towards the International Border as recognized by us. This will be done with a view to establishing additional posts located to prevent the Chinese from advancing further and also to dominate any Chinese posts already established in our territory. [...]

The forward policy had Nehru identify a set of strategies designed with the ultimate goal of effectively forcing the Chinese from territory that the Indian government claimed. The doctrine was based on a theory that China would not likely launch an all-out war if India began to occupy territory that China considered to be its own. India's thinking was partly based on the fact that China had many external problems in early 1962, especially with one of the Taiwan Strait Crises. Also, Chinese leaders had insisted they did not wish a war. [18]

Nehru began acting out a policy of establishing new outposts further to the north of the line of control. In June 1962, local Indian commanders had established Dhola Post, in Tawang. The issue was that Dhola Post was one mile north of the McMahon line and was clearly regarded as being in Chinese territory, even by Indian standards. [18]

General Niranjan Prasad, the commander of the Fourth Division, later wrote, "We at the front knew that since Nehru had said he was going to attack, the Chinese were certainly not going to wait to be attacked". [19]

Nehru's forward policy did not achieve what he had wanted. Contrary to his predictions, China attacked Indian outposts north of the McMahon Line. Thus began the Sino-Indian War, which lasted 30 days as China eventually pushed Indian forces back miles south of the McMahon line. China unilaterally declared a ceasefire with a message that India has entered Chinese territory.[ citation needed ]

With respect to China, Indian diplomat T. N. Kaul later wrote that the only valid, logical and reasonable surmise seems to be that: [20]

China's radical leaders... wanted China to become the leader of the communist world and the "Big Brother" in Asia, with a string of client states around it.... India seemed to be the main obstacle in extending China's hegemony over Asia and then assume the leadership of the Third World.... This was China's "forward policy" against India. She wanted to show the Third World that India was military weak, socially decadent and economically dependent on Western aid.

C. Raja Mohan used the phrase "forward policy" in 2003 with respect to India in Afghanistan. [21] The term has also been used in relation to the 2020 China–India skirmishes.[ citation needed ]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Indian War</span> 1962 war between China and India

The Sino–Indian War, also known as the China–India War or the Indo–China War, was an armed conflict between China and India that took place from October to November 1962. It was a military escalation of the Sino–Indian border dispute. Fighting occurred along India's border with China, in India's North-East Frontier Agency east of Bhutan, and in Aksai Chin west of Nepal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">McMahon Line</span> Boundary between the Tibetan region of China and India

The McMahon Line is the boundary between Tibet and British India as agreed in the maps and notes exchanged by the respective plenipotentiaries on 24–25 March 1914 at Delhi, as part of the 1914 Simla Convention. The line delimited the respective spheres of influence of the two countries in the eastern Himalayan region along northeast India and northern Burma (Myanmar), which were earlier undefined. The Republic of China was not a party to the McMahon Line agreement, but the line was part of the overall boundary of Tibet defined in the Simla Convention, initialled by all three parties and later repudiated by the government of China. The Indian part of the Line currently serves as the de facto boundary between China and India, although its legal status is disputed by the People's Republic of China. The Burmese part of the Line was renegotiated by the People's Republic of China and Myanmar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jelep La</span> Mountain pass between Sikkim, India and Tibet

Jelep La elevation 14,390 feet (4,390 m), is a high mountain pass between Sikkim, India and Tibet Autonomous Region, China. It is on a route that connects Lhasa to India. The pass is about 4 km (2.5 mi) south of Nathu La and is slightly higher. It was frequently used for trade between Tibet and India during the British Raj, with Kalimpong serving as the contact point. The Menmecho Lake lies below the Jelep La.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chumbi Valley</span> Valley in Yadong County, Tibet, China

The Chumbi Valley, called Dromo or Tromo in Tibetan, is a valley in the Himalayas that projects southwards from the Tibetan plateau, intervening between Sikkim and Bhutan. It is coextensive with the administrative unit Yadong County in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. The Chumbi Valley is connected to Sikkim to the southwest via the mountain passes of Nathu La and Jelep La.

A long series of events triggered the Sino-Indian War in 1962. According to John W. Garver, Chinese perceptions about the Indian designs for Tibet, and the failure to demarcate a common border between China and India were important in China's decision to fight a war with India.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-Indian border dispute</span> Border dispute between China and India

The Sino–Indian border dispute is an ongoing territorial dispute over the sovereignty of two relatively large, and several smaller, separated pieces of territory between China and India. The territorial disputes between the two countries result from the historical consequences of colonialism in Asia and the lack of clear historical boundary demarcations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies</span>

The Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, formerly called Central University for Tibetan Studies (CUTS), is a Deemed University founded in Sarnath, Varanasi, India, in 1967, as an autonomous organisation under Union Ministry of Culture. The CIHTS was founded by Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru in consultation with Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama, with the aim of educating Tibetan youths in exile and Himalayan border students as well as with the aim of retranslating lost Indo-Buddhist Sanskrit texts that now existed only in Tibetan, into Sanskrit, to Hindi, and other modern Indian languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutan–China relations</span> Bilateral relations

Bhutan-China relations refer to the international relationship between the Kingdom of Bhutan and the People's Republic of China. As of present, Bhutan and China do not share an official diplomatic relationship with one another.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">China–Nepal relations</span> Bilateral relations

The bilateral relations between Nepal and China are defined by the Sino-Nepalese Treaty of Peace and Friendship signed on April 28, 1960, by the two countries. Though initially unenthusiastic, Nepal has been of late making efforts to increase trade and connectivity with China. Relations between Nepal and China got a boost when both countries solved all border disputes along the China–Nepal border by signing the Sino-Nepal boundary agreement on March 21, 1960, making Nepal the first neighboring country of China to conclude a border treaty with China. The governments of both Nepal and China ratified the border treaty on October 5, 1961. From 1975 onward, Nepal has maintained a policy of balancing the competing influence of China and Nepal's southern neighbor India, the only two neighbors of the Himalayan country after the accession of the Kingdom of Sikkim into India in 1975.

The Dogra–Tibetan war or Sino-Sikh war was fought from May 1841 to August 1842, between the forces of the Dogra Raja Gulab Singh of Jammu, under the suzerainty of the Sikh Empire, and those of Tibet, under the protectorate of the Qing dynasty. Gulab Singh's commander was the able general Zorawar Singh Kahluria, who, after the conquest of Ladakh, attempted to extend its boundaries in order to control the trade routes into Ladakh. Zorawar Singh's campaign, suffering from the effects of inclement weather, suffered a defeat at Taklakot (Purang) and Singh was killed. The Tibetans then advanced on Ladakh. Gulab Singh sent reinforcements under the command of his nephew Jawahir Singh. A subsequent battle near Chushul in 1842 led to a Tibetan defeat. A treaty was signed in 1842 maintaining the status quo ante bellum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bhutan–China border</span> International border

The Bhutan–China border is the international boundary between Bhutan and China, running for 477 km (296 mi) through the Himalayas between the two tripoints with India. The official boundaries remain disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doklam</span> Disputed area between China and Bhutan

Doklam, called Donglang by China, is an area in Chumbi Valley with a high plateau and a valley, lying between China's Yadong County to the north, Bhutan's Ha District to the east and India's Sikkim state to the west. Since the 1960s, China and Bhutan have disputed sovereignty over the Doklam area. The dispute has not been resolved despite several rounds of border negotiations between Bhutan and China. The area is of strategic importance to all three countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Namka Chu</span>

Namka Chu or Kejielang River is a tributary of Nyamjang Chu that flows along the disputed border between India and China. The Indian side of the border is the Tawang district in Arunachal Pradesh. The Tibetan side of the border is in Tsona Dzong, Shannan province of Tibet. Namka Chu originates near the trijunction of Tibet, Bhutan and India and flows east for 26 km before joining Nyamjang Chu. It is about 200 kilometers away from the Misamari railhead and 60 kilometers from the Tawang road head. The Namka Chu valley was the scene of some of the most fierce fighting during the 1962 Sino-Indian war.

The Charding Nullah, traditionally known as the Lhari stream and called Demchok River by China, is a small river that originates near the Charding La pass that is also on the border between the two countries and flows northeast to join the Indus River near a peak called "Demchok Karpo" or "Lhari Karpo". There are villages on both sides of the mouth of the river called by the same name "Demchok", which is presumed to have been a single village originally, and has gotten split into two due to geopolitcal reasons. The river serves as the de facto border between China and India in the southern part of the Demchok sector.

The Demchok sector is a disputed area named after the villages of Demchok in Ladakh and Demchok in Tibet, situated near the confluence of the Charding Nullah and Indus River. It is a part of the greater Sino-Indian border dispute between China and India. Both China and India claim the disputed region, with a Line of Actual Control between the two nations situated along the Charding Nullah.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">India–Tibet relations</span> Relations between Tibet and India

Tibet–India relations are said to have begun during the spread of Buddhism to Tibet from India during the 6th century AD. In 1959, the Dalai Lama fled to India after the failed 1959 Tibetan uprising. Since then, Tibetans-in-exile have been given asylum in India, with the Indian government accommodating them into 45 residential settlements across 10 states in the country, creating the Tibetan diaspora. From around 150,000 Tibetan refugees in 2011, the number fell to 85,000 in 2018, according to government data. Many Tibetans are now leaving India to go back to Tibet and other countries such as United States or Germany. The Government of India, soon after India's independence in 1947, treated Tibet as a de facto independent country. However, more recently India's policy on Tibet has been mindful of Chinese sensibilities, and has recognized Tibet as a part of China.

Dhola Post was a border post set up by the Indian Army in June 1962, at a location called Che Dong, in the Namka Chu river valley area disputed by China and India. The area is now generally accepted to be north of the McMahon Line as drawn on the treaty map of 1914, but it was to the south of the Thagla Ridge, where India held the McMahon Line to lie. On 20 September 1962, amidst various border tensions, the post was attacked by Chinese forces from the Thagla Ridge, and sporadic fighting continued till 20 October when an all-out attack was launched by China leading to the Sino-Indian War. Facing an overwhelming force, the Indian Army evacuated the Dhola Post as well as the entire area of Tawang, retreating to Sela and Bomdila. After the war, the post was left unoccupied until the 1986 Sumdorong Chu standoff, after which the area was again strengthened by the Indian Army.

The Five Fingers of Tibet was a Chinese territorial claim to the Himalayan region bordering India attributed to Mao Zedong. It considers Tibet to be China's right hand palm, with five fingers on its periphery: Ladakh, Nepal, Sikkim, Bhutan, and North-East Frontier Agency that are considered China's responsibility to "liberate". The policy however has never been discussed in official Chinese public statements and is now dormant, but concerns have often been raised over its possible continued existence or revival.

The 1954 Sino-Indian Agreement, also called the Panchsheel Agreement, officially the Agreement on Trade and Intercourse Between Tibet Region and India, was signed by China and India in Peking on 29 April 1954. The preamble of the agreement stated the panchsheel, or the five principles of peaceful coexistence, that China proposed and India favoured. The agreement reflected the adjustment of the previously existing trade relations between Tibet and India to the changed context of India's decolonisation and China's assertion of suzerainty over Tibet. Bertil Lintner writes that in the agreement, "Tibet was referred to, for the first time in history, as 'the Tibet Region of China'".

Longju or Longzu is a disputed area in the eastern sector of the China–India border, controlled by China but claimed by India. The village of Longju is located in the Tsari Chu valley 2.5 kilometres (1.6 mi) south of the town of Migyitun, considered the historical border of Tibet. The area of Longju southwards is populated by the Tagin tribe of Arunachal Pradesh.

References

  1. ↑ U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (1922), The defensive, p. 38
  2. ↑ Palace 1995, p. 2.
  3. ↑ Palace 1995, pp. 19–22.
  4. ↑ Labh 1974, p. 237… Bhutan's emergence as a British Protectorate in January 1910 was hastened by China's attempt to establish its suzerainty over Bhutan in 1908. Soon after the withdrawal of British troops from the Chumbi Valley, China asserted its suzerainty over Bhutan in pursuance of its forward policy towards the Himalayan states, a policy which it had followed ever since the return of the Younghusband Missson from Lhasa.
  5. ↑ Palace 1995, pp. 236–243.
  6. ↑ Labh 1974, p. 238… China, which had been pursuing a forward policy towards the Himalayan states since the departure of the Younghusband Mission from Lhasa, staged a full-fledged invasion of Tibet in February 1910. It would have penetrated into Bhutan as well if the latter had not enjoyed the protection of the British.
  7. 1 2 Jensen 2012, p. 62.
  8. ↑ Sandhu, Shankar & Dwivedi 2015, p. 39.
  9. ↑ Noorani 1970, p. 136.
  10. 1 2 Jensen 2012, p. 56.
  11. ↑ Jha, Prem Shankar (5 June 2020). "Why It Is Imperative That Indians Come to Know What Happened in 1962". The Wire. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
  12. ↑ Banerjee, Ajay (6 December 2017). "Nehru's forward policy not to blame for '62 war: Book". Tribuneindia News Service. Retrieved 28 January 2021.
  13. ↑ Jensen 2012, p. 64.
  14. ↑ Jensen 2012, pp. 64–65.
  15. ↑ Noorani 1970, pp. 136–137.
  16. ↑ Maxwell & Noorani 1971, p. 157.
  17. ↑ Noorani 1970, p. 138.
  18. 1 2 "The China-India Border War". www.globalsecurity.org. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
  19. ↑ Rautela, Parakram (2 April 2014). "It wasn't China, but Nehru who declared 1962 war: Australian journalist Neville Maxwell". The Times of India. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
  20. ↑ Shaw, Yu-ming (5 April 2019). "The 1962 Sino-Indian Border Conflict and After". Mainland China: Politics, Economics, and Reform. Routledge. ISBN   978-0-429-70953-1.
  21. ↑ Mohan, C. Raja (22 February 2003). "India's forward policy". The Hindu. Retrieved 28 January 2021– via mea.gov.in.
Bibliography

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.