Hawk/goose effect

Last updated

In ethology and cognitive ethology, the hawk/goose effect refers to a behavior observed in some young birds when another bird flies above them: if the flying bird is a goose, the young birds show no reaction, but if the flying bird is a hawk, the young birds either become more agitated or cower to reduce the danger. The observation that short-necked and long-tailed birds flying overhead caused alarm was noted by Oskar Heinroth. Friedrich Goethe conducted experiments with silhouettes to examine alarm reactions in 1937 and a more systematic study was conducted in the same year by Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen which is considered one of the classic experiments of ethology. [1] [2] [3] [4]

Contents

One of the goose/hawk models as reported by Tinbergen. Moving it from right to left (in the direction of dashed arrow) produced no response, but moving it from left to right (in the direction of solid arrow) elicited the behavior. Tinbergen goose-hawk.png
One of the goose/hawk models as reported by Tinbergen. Moving it from right to left (in the direction of dashed arrow) produced no response, but moving it from left to right (in the direction of solid arrow) elicited the behavior.

As part of their introducing experimentalism into animal behavior research they performed experiments in which they made 2-dimensional silhouettes of various bird-like shapes and moved them across the young birds' line of vision. Goose-like shapes were ignored while hawk-like shapes produced the response. Later Tinbergen reported that a single shape that was sort of an abstract composite of the hawk and goose silhouettes could produce the effect if moved in one direction but not the other. A study later confirmed that perception of an object was influenced by the direction of motion because the object in question was considered to be moving forwards in that direction. [5] Initially thought to be an inborn instinct developed from natural selection, it was subsequently shown by others to be socially reinforced by other birds. [6]

Hawk or goose distinguished by direction of movement

Just like what is seen in Tinbergen’s 1951 experiment [7] the same figure is used to represent both the hawk and the goose in most hawk/goose experiments. When moving the figure in one direction, it represents a shape resembling a hawk (short neck long tail) while moving the figure in the opposite direction resembles a goose (long neck short tail). [8] The perceived identity influences how the figure is perceived to move, such that the figure is assumed to be a hawk or a goose based on the movement in direction of the head and the protrusion of the wings (short on one end and a long one on the other). [8]

Innate or learned behaviour

A Brief History Pointing to Innate Behavior

Friedrich Goethe was the first to perform experiments using silhouettes (1937, 1940). He found that naive Capercaillie exhibited a greater fear response to a silhouette of a hawk than to a circle, a triangle, or a generalized bird silhouette, but that this varied with both species, and prior experience. [9] Tinbergen, in 1951, pointed out that he was inspired by Oscar Heinroth's observations in which he stated that domestic chickens are more alarmed by short necked birds, over long necks ones. [10] This provoked Konrad Lorenz's and Nikolaas Tinbergen's to design and explore the Hawk/Goose effect. Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen worked together in 1937 on experiments that were each published separately in 1939. [11] Lorenz and Tinbergen reported differences in their experiments with Lorenz arguing that a short neck only elicits a flight response in turkeys, [12] while Tinbergen claimed: “The reactions of young gallinaceous birds, ducks, and geese to a flying bird of prey are released by the sign-stimulus ‘short neck’ among others”. [10] Tinbergen published 2 papers in 1948 on the subject. [11] In 1951 Tinbergen continued to report on what he described as innate behavior and stated that goslings display a fear response when an ambiguous goose-hawk figure was moved in the "hawk" direction, implying that goslings associate a particular shape with a particular direction of motion. [10]

There have been a number of other studies supporting Tinbergen's short neck hypothesis [11] with some as recent as the 1980s such as Helmut C. Mueller and Patricia G. Parker, in 1980, demonstrated that naive mallard ducklings shows a greater variance in heart rate to the hawk models over the goose models. [13] They concluded that cardiac response is an excellent measurement of fear and controlled for learned behavior by maintaining the ducklings in a brooder until they were transported to their laboratory in opaque containers [13] and in 1982, Elizabeth L. Moore and Helmut C. Mueller found that a chick's heart rate was of greater variance in response to the hawk model without prior, pertinent experience, suggesting a greater innate fear response to the hawk over the goose. [14] Obvious behavioral responses to fear were not identified. [14]

Most ethologists today believe that the behaviors elicited by the hawk/goose modals are socially reinforced or are more likely to support the Schleit's “selective habituation hypothesis".

A Brief History Pointing to Learned Behavior

After discrepancies between the results of Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen, Hirsch et al. in 1955, concluded that Tinbergen's hypothesis could not be replicated in Leghorn Chickens [15] In 1960, McNiven, concluded that Tinbergen's hypothesis could not be replicated in ducklings [16] and in an attempt to replicate Tinbergen's experiments, Schleit's, in 1961 believed Tinbergen falsified his data. [11] Like the experiments that still support Tinbergan's short neck hypothesis, there are many experiments that do not [11]

Controversy

Konrad Lorenz met Nikolaas Tinbergen in 1936 at the Leiden Instinct Symposium. [11] In 1937, Tinbergen and Lorenz worked on two projects, an experimental analysis of egg-rolling behavior in the greylag goose, supporting the fixed action pattern hypothesis, and the responses of various young birds to cardboard models of raptors and other flying birds.

Based on Oscar Heinroth’s hypothesis that domestic chickens showed the greatest amount of fear towards long tailed, short necked birds flying overhead, [17] Tinbergen and Lorenz designed silhouettes that could represent a hawk like figure if moved in one direction, or a goose like figure if moved in the other direction. [17] Tinbergen and Lorenz moved the models overhead of varies species of birds and recorded their responses. [12]

Tinbergen believed that these experiments prove Heinroth’s hypothesis but Lorenz noted that the shape of the model did not seem to matter for all species except turkeys. [12] [17] Lorenz pointed out that all other species presented alarm responses (fixating, alarm calling and marching off to cover), regardless of the model used and that “slow relative speed” of a flying object can elicit an anti-predator response. [12] Lorenz and Tinbergen published their original findings separately in 1939. [11] Re-examination of the experiments were invoked due to the differences in results.

In 1955, Hirsch et al. presented that Tinbergen's hypothesis could not be replicated in Leghorn Chickens. [14] Schleidt, in 1961 did his best to replicate Tinbergen’s experiments using, free-ranging geese, ducks, and turkeys and found that regardless of the shape, these birds presented a fear response that diminished over a number of trials, pointing to the likelihood of habituation. [18] Schleidt did find evidence to support Lorenz’s “slow relative speed” findings. [18] A second experiment was performed by Schleidt in 1961 to determine if turkeys, who have never been exposed to a flying object, would support Tinbergen’s predisposition hypothesis and present a fear response to the hawk-shaped object in the hawk/goose model. Schleidt used 5 bronze turkeys that were raised indoors with no windows. [19] Schleidt’s results again, supported the “selective habituation hypothesis,” and not innate behavior. [19] Thus, the short neck hypothesis appears to have been falsified by Tinbergen. [11]

Related Research Articles

Ethology Scientific objective study of animal behaviour

Ethology is the scientific study of animal behaviour, usually with a focus on behaviour under natural conditions, and viewing behaviour as an evolutionarily adaptive trait. Behaviourism as a term also describes the scientific and objective study of animal behaviour, usually referring to measured responses to stimuli or to trained behavioural responses in a laboratory context, without a particular emphasis on evolutionary adaptivity. Throughout history, different naturalists have studied aspects of animal behaviour. Ethology has its scientific roots in the work of Charles Darwin and of American and German ornithologists of the late 19th and early 20th century, including Charles O. Whitman, Oskar Heinroth, and Wallace Craig. The modern discipline of ethology is generally considered to have begun during the 1930s with the work of Dutch biologist Nikolaas Tinbergen and Austrian biologists Konrad Lorenz and Karl von Frisch, the three recipients of the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Ethology combines laboratory and field science, with a strong relation to some other disciplines such as neuroanatomy, ecology, and evolutionary biology. Ethologists typically show interest in a behavioural process rather than in a particular animal group, and often study one type of behaviour, such as aggression, in a number of unrelated species.

Konrad Lorenz Austrian zoologist (1903–1989)

Konrad Zacharias Lorenz was an Austrian zoologist, ethologist, and ornithologist. He shared the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Nikolaas Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch. He is often regarded as one of the founders of modern ethology, the study of animal behavior. He developed an approach that began with an earlier generation, including his teacher Oskar Heinroth.

Nikolaas Tinbergen Dutch Zoologist, ethologist (1907–1988)

Nikolaas "Niko" Tinbergen was a Dutch biologist and ornithologist who shared the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine with Karl von Frisch and Konrad Lorenz for their discoveries concerning the organization and elicitation of individual and social behavior patterns in animals. He is regarded as one of the founders of modern ethology, the study of animal behavior.

Instinct Behaviour due to innate biological factors

Instinct is the inherent inclination of a living organism towards a particular complex behaviour, containing both innate (inborn) and learned elements. The simplest example of an instinctive behaviour is a fixed action pattern (FAP), in which a very short to medium length sequence of actions, without variation, are carried out in response to a corresponding clearly defined stimulus.

Supernormal stimulus Concept in biology and psychology

A supernormal stimulus or superstimulus is an exaggerated version of a stimulus to which there is an existing response tendency, or any stimulus that elicits a response more strongly than the stimulus for which it evolved.

Animal cognition Intelligence of non-human animals

Animal cognition encompasses the mental capacities of non-human animals including insect cognition. The study of animal conditioning and learning used in this field was developed from comparative psychology. It has also been strongly influenced by research in ethology, behavioral ecology, and evolutionary psychology; the alternative name cognitive ethology is sometimes used. Many behaviors associated with the term animal intelligence are also subsumed within animal cognition.

<i>On Aggression</i> 1963 book by Konrad Lorenz

On Aggression is a 1963 book by the ethologist Konrad Lorenz; it was translated into English in 1966. As he writes in the prologue, "the subject of this book is aggression, that is to say the fighting instinct in beast and man which is directed against members of the same species."

Ritualization is a behavior that occurs typically in a member of a given species in a highly stereotyped fashion and independent of any direct physiological significance. It is found, in differing forms, both in non-human animals and in humans.

Neuroethology Study of animal behavior and its underlying mechanistic control by the nervous system

Neuroethology is the evolutionary and comparative approach to the study of animal behavior and its underlying mechanistic control by the nervous system. It is an interdisciplinary science that combines both neuroscience and ethology. A central theme of neuroethology, which differentiates it from other branches of neuroscience, is its focus on behaviors that have been favored by natural selection rather than on behaviors that are specific to a particular disease state or laboratory experiment.

Oskar Heinroth German zoologist

Oskar Heinroth was a German biologist who was one of the first to apply the methods of comparative morphology to animal behavior, and was thus one of the founders of ethology. He worked, largely isolated from most other scientists of the period, at the Berlin Aquarium where he took care of fishes, reptiles and birds, especially waterfowl.

Terror management theory Social and evolutionary psychology theory

Terror management theory (TMT) is both a social and evolutionary psychology theory originally proposed by Jeff Greenberg, Sheldon Solomon, and Tom Pyszczynski and codified in their book The Worm at the Core: On the Role of Death in Life (2015). It proposes that a basic psychological conflict results from having a self-preservation instinct while realizing that death is inevitable and to some extent unpredictable. This conflict produces terror, which is managed through a combination of escapism and cultural beliefs that act to counter biological reality with more significant and enduring forms of meaning and value.

A fixed action pattern is an ethological term describing an instinctive behavioral sequence that is highly stereotyped and species-characteristic. Fixed action patterns are said to be produced by the innate releasing mechanism, a "hard-wired" neural network, in response to a sign/key stimulus or releaser. Once released, a fixed action pattern runs to completion.

William Homan Thorpe

William Homan Thorpe FRS was Professor of Animal Ethology at the University of Cambridge, and a significant British zoologist, ethologist and ornithologist. Together with Nikolaas Tinbergen, Patrick Bateson and Robert Hinde, Thorpe contributed to the growth and acceptance of behavioural biology in Great Britain.

Displacement activity

Displacement activities occur when an animal experiences high motivation for two or more conflicting behaviours: the resulting displacement activity is usually unrelated to the competing motivations. Birds, for example, may peck at grass when uncertain whether to attack or flee from an opponent; similarly, a human may scratch their head when they do not know which of two options to choose. Displacement activities may also occur when animals are prevented from performing a single behaviour for which they are highly motivated. Displacement activities often involve actions which bring comfort to the animal such as scratching, preening, drinking or feeding.

History of attachment theory

Attachment theory, originating in the work of John Bowlby, is a psychological, evolutionary and ethological theory that provides a descriptive and explanatory framework for understanding interpersonal relationships between human beings.

Human ethology is the study of human behavior. Ethology as a discipline is generally thought of as a sub-category of biology, though psychological theories have been developed based on ethological ideas. The bridging between biological sciences and social sciences creates an understanding of human ethology. The International Society for Human Ethology is dedicated to advancing the study and understanding of human ethology.

Kurt Ernestovich Fabri was an Austrian-born Soviet biologist and professor at Moscow State University who contributed to the scientific study of animal behavior in the Soviet Union.

The frustration–aggression hypothesis, also known as the frustration–aggression–displacement theory, is a theory of aggression proposed by John Dollard, Neal Miller, Leonard Doob, Orval Mowrer, and Robert Sears in 1939, and further developed by Neal Miller in 1941 and Leonard Berkowitz in 1969. The theory says that aggression is the result of blocking, or frustrating, a person's efforts to attain a goal.

Critical anthropomorphism refers to a perspective in the study of animal behavior that encompasses using the sentience of the observer to generate hypotheses in light of scientific knowledge of the species, its perceptual world, and ecological and evolutionary history. The term is of particular relevance to mentalistic behavioral mechanisms, and its application involves using "natural history, our perceptions, intuitions, feelings, careful behavioral descriptions, identifying with the animal, optimization models, previous studies and so forth in order to generate ideas that may prove useful in gaining understanding and the ability to predict outcomes of planned (experimental) and unplanned interventions".

Wolfgang Schleidt

Wolfgang M. Schleidt is an Austrian scientist specializing in the areas of bioacoustics, communication and classical ethology. He was assistant to Konrad Lorenz, professor of zoology, University of Maryland (1965–1985) and director at the Konrad Lorenz Institut for Ethology, Vienna of the Austrian Academy of Sciences. He was an early pioneer of bioacoustics and of the quantitative analysis of behavior.

References

  1. ↑ Lorenz, Konrad (1939). "Vergleichende verhaltensforschung". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Zoologischer Anzeiger, Supplementband. 12: 69–102.
  2. ↑ Tinbergen, Nikolaas (1939). "Why do birds behave as they do? (II)". Bird-Lore. 41: 23–30.
  3. ↑ Jeffrey Alan Gray (1987). The Psychology of Fear and Stress. CUP Archive. p. 7. ISBN   978-0-521-27098-4.
  4. ↑ Schleidt, Wolfgang; Shalter, Michael D.; Moura-Neto, Humberto (2011). "The hawk/goose story: The classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited" (PDF). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 125 (2): 121–133. doi:10.1037/a0022068. ISSN   1939-2087. PMID   21341906.
  5. ↑ Bernstein, Lori J.; Cooper, Lynn A. (1997). "Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 23 (3): 721–737. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.721. PMID   9180041.
  6. ↑ Schleidt, W; Shalter, MD; Moura-Neto, H (2011). "The Hawk/Goose Story:The Classical Ethological Experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, Revisited". J Comp Psychol. 125 (2): 121–133. doi:10.1037/a0022068. PMID   21341906.
  7. ↑ Carmichael, Leonard (1952-04-18). "The Study of Instinct. N. Tinbergen. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1951. 228 pp. $7.00". Science. 115 (2990): 438–439. doi:10.1126/science.115.2990.438-a. ISSN   0036-8075.
  8. 1 2 Bernstein, L. J.; Cooper, L. A. (June 1997). "Direction of motion influences perceptual identification of ambiguous figures". Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance. 23 (3): 721–737. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.721. ISSN   0096-1523. PMID   9180041.
  9. ↑ Goethe, Friedrich (1937). "Beobachtungen und Erfahrungen bei Aufzucht von deutschem Auerwild". Deutsche Jagd, 6 and 7.
  10. 1 2 3 Carmichael, Leonard (1952-04-18). "The Study of Instinct. N. Tinbergen. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1951. 228 pp. $7.00". Science. 115 (2990): 438–439. doi:10.1126/science.115.2990.438-a. ISSN   0036-8075.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Schleidt, Wolfgang; Shalter, Michael D.; Moura-Neto, Humberto (May 2011). "The hawk/goose story: the classical ethological experiments of Lorenz and Tinbergen, revisited". Journal of Comparative Psychology. 125 (2): 121–133. doi:10.1037/a0022068. ISSN   1939-2087. PMID   21341906.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Lorenz, Konrad (1939). "Vergleichende verhaltensforschung". Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Zoologischer Anzeiger Supplementband. 12: 69–102.
  13. 1 2 Mueller, Helmut C.; Parker, Patricia G. (1980). "Naive Ducklings Show Different Cardiac Response To Hawk Than To Goose Models". Behaviour. 74 (1): 101–112. doi:10.1163/156853980x00339.
  14. 1 2 3 Moore, E. L.; Mueller, H. C. (September 1982). "Cardiac response of domestic chickens to hawk and goose models". Behavioural Processes. 7 (3): 255–258. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(82)90040-7. ISSN   0376-6357. PMID   24923185. S2CID   12357713.
  15. ↑ Hirsch, J., Lindley, R. H., & Tolman, E. C. (1955). "An experimental test of an alleged innate sign stimulus". Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 48 (4): 278–280. doi:10.1037/h0048908. PMID   13252157.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. ↑ McNiven, M. (1960). ""Social releaser mechanism" in birds–a controlled replication of Tinbergen's study". Psychological Record. 10 (4): 259–265. doi:10.1007/BF03393371. S2CID   149300719.
  17. 1 2 3 Carmichael, Leonard (1952-04-18). "The Study of Instinct. N. Tinbergen. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1951. 228 pp. $7.00". Science. 115 (2990): 438–439. doi:10.1126/science.115.2990.438-a. ISSN   0036-8075.
  18. 1 2 Schleidt, W. M. (1961). "Über die Auslösung der Flucht vor Raubvögeln bei Truthühnern". Die Naturwissenschaften. 48 (5): 141–142. Bibcode:1961NW.....48..141S. doi:10.1007/BF00631948. S2CID   9335023.
  19. 1 2 Schleidt, W. M. (1961). "Reaktionen von Truthühnern auf fliegende Raubvögel und Versuche zur Analyse ihres AAM's". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 18 (5): 534–560. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1961.tb00241.x.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.