List of 14th amendment cases

Last updated

This is a list of fourteenth amendment cases that have been decided under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Equal Protection Clause
Case nameYearCitationDecision
Ward v. Flood 187448 Cal. 36upheld separate but equal schools in San Francisco
Plessy v. Ferguson 1896163 U.S. 537separate but equal for public facilities
Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education 1899175 U.S. 528de jure segregation of races
Lum v. Rice 1927275 U.S. 78separate schools for Chinese pupils from white schoolchildren
Roberto Alvarez v. Board of Trustees of the Lemon Grove School District193166625 Cal. Super.first successful school desegregation court decision in U.S. history
Powell v. Alabama 1932287 U.S. 45access to counsel
Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada 1938305 U.S. 337states that provide a school to white students must provide in-state education to blacks
Smith v. Allwright 1944321 U.S. 649Race-based exclusion in political party primaries held unconstitutional
Hedgepeth and Williams v. Board of Education 1944131 N.J.L. 153NJ Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in NJ schools
Mendez v. Westminster 194664 F. Supp. 544prohibits segregating Mexican American children in California
Sipuel v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla. 1948322 U.S. 631access to taxpayer state funded law schools
Shelley v. Kraemer 1948334 U.S. 1restrictive covenants
Sweatt v. Painter 1950339 U.S. 629segregated law schools in Texas
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents 1950339 U.S. 637prohibited racially unfriendly practices within a state graduate program
Hernandez v. Texas 1954347 U.S. 475the 14th Amendment protects those beyond the racial classes of white or Negro
Briggs v. Elliott 1952347 U.S. 483Brown case 1 Summerton, South Carolina
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County 1952103 F. Supp. 337Brown Case 2 - Prince Edward County, Virginia
Gebhart v. Belton 195233 Del. Ch. 144Brown Case 2 - Claymont, Delaware
Bolling v. Sharpe 1954347 U.S. 497Brown companion case—dealt with the constitutionality of segregation in the District of Columbia
Browder v. Gayle 1956142 F. Supp. 707 Montgomery, Alabama bus segregation is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment protections for equal treatment
NAACP v. Alabama 1958357 U.S. 449privacy of NAACP membership lists, and free association of members
Cooper v. Aaron 1958358 U.S. 1Federal court enforcement of desegregation
Boynton v. Virginia 1960364 U.S. 454Interstate commerce clause prohibits segregation at bus stop restaurant
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States 1964379 U.S. 241upheld the constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Loving v. Virginia 1967388 U.S. 1banned anti-miscegenation laws
Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education 1969396 U.S. 1218changed Brown's requirement of desegregation "with all deliberate speed" to one of "desegregation now"
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education 1971402 U.S. 1establish bussing as a solution
Guey Heung Lee v. Johnson 1971404 U.S 1215"Brown v. Board of Education was not written for blacks alone", desegregation of Asian schools in opposition to parents of Asian students
Milliken v. Bradley 1974418 U.S. 717rejected bussing across school district lines
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978438 U.S. 265race could be considered among other factors in the college admissions process, but racial quotas under affirmative action are unconstitutional
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 2007551 U.S. 701rejected using race as the sole determining factor for assigning students to schools
Obergefell v. Hodges 2015556 U.S. 14the United States Supreme Court ruled that marriage is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore must be afforded to same-sex couples. The ruling ensured that statewide bans on same-sex marriage could not be held up as constitutional.

Related Research Articles

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Article of amendment to the U.S. Constitution, enumerating citizenship rights as well as civil and political liberties

The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. Often considered one of the most consequential amendments, it addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law and was proposed in response to issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War. The amendment was bitterly contested, particularly by the states of the defeated Confederacy, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress. The amendment, particularly its first section, is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, forming the basis for landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954) regarding racial segregation, Roe v. Wade (1973) regarding abortion, Bush v. Gore (2000) regarding the 2000 presidential election, and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) regarding same-sex marriage. The amendment limits the actions of all state and local officials, and also those acting on behalf of such officials.

Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Article of amendment to the U.S. Constitution, enumerating prohibition of federal and state governments denying right to vote on account of race

The Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal government and each state from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen's "race, color, or previous condition of servitude." It was ratified on February 3, 1870, as the third and last of the Reconstruction Amendments.

A Congressional power of enforcement is included in a number of amendments to the United States Constitution. The language "The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation" is used, with slight variations, in Amendments XIII, XIV, XV, XIX, XXIII, XXIV, and XXVI. The variations in the pertinent language are as follows: The Thirteenth Amendment leaves out the word "the", the Fourteenth Amendment states "The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." In addition to the amendments above, the Eighteenth Amendment states "The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

The Fourteenth Amendment may refer to:

The Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution only protects the legal rights that are associated with federal U.S. citizenship, not those that pertain to state citizenship. The decision consolidated two similar cases.

United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1876), was an important United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Bill of Rights did not apply to private actors or to state governments despite the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. It reversed criminal convictions for the civil rights violations committed in aid of anti-reconstruction murders. Decided during the Reconstruction Era, the case represented a major blow to federal efforts to protect the civil rights of African Americans.

City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court concerning the scope of Congress's power of enforcement under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. The case also had a significant impact on historic preservation.

Due Process Clause Clauses in the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution

In United States constitutional law, a Due Process Clause is found in both the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which prohibits arbitrary deprivation of life, liberty, or property by the government except as authorized by law.

Civil Rights Act of 1866 First U. S. federal law to define citizenship and affirm that all citizens are equally protected by the law

The Civil Rights Act of 1866 was the first United States federal law to define citizenship and affirm that all citizens are equally protected by the law. It was mainly intended, in the wake of the American Civil War, to protect the civil rights of persons of African descent born in or brought to the United States.

Equal Protection Clause Guarantee of law protecting all persons equally in the United States

The Equal Protection Clause is part of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause, which took effect in 1868, provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treated equally by the law.

Incorporation, in United States law, is the doctrine by which portions of the Bill of Rights have been made applicable to the states. When the Bill of Rights was ratified, the courts held that its protections extended only to the actions of the federal government and that the Bill of Rights did not place limitations on the authority of the state and local governments. However, the post-Civil War era, beginning in 1865 with the Thirteenth Amendment, which declared the abolition of slavery, gave rise to the incorporation of other Amendments, applying more rights to the states and people over time. Gradually, various portions of the Bill of Rights have been held to be applicable to the state and local governments by incorporation through the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 and the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870.

Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held 6—3 that, while the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the states, the exclusionary rule was not a necessary ingredient of the Fourth Amendment's right against warrantless and unreasonable searches and seizures. In Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), the Court held that as a matter of judicial implication the exclusionary rule was enforceable in federal courts but not derived from the explicit requirements of the Fourth Amendment. The Wolf Court decided not to incorporate the exclusionary rule as part of the Fourteenth Amendment in large part because the states which had rejected the Weeks Doctrine had not left the right to privacy without other means of protection. However, because most of the states' rules proved to be ineffective in deterrence, the Court overruled Wolf in Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961). This landmark case made history as the exclusionary rule enforceable against the states through the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the same extent that it applied against the federal government.

The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution Act 1992 is an amendment to the Constitution of Ireland which specified that the protection of the right to life of the unborn does not limit the right to distribute information about services in foreign countries. It was approved by referendum on 25 November 1992 and signed into law on 23 December of the same year.

Privileges or Immunities Clause Part of the fourteenth amendment to the US constitution

The Privileges or Immunities Clause is Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution. Along with the rest of the Fourteenth Amendment, this clause became part of the Constitution on July 9, 1868.

Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 (1966), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court found that Virginia's poll tax was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, eleven southern states established poll taxes as part of their disenfranchisement of most blacks and many poor whites. The Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1964) prohibited poll taxes in federal elections; five states continued to require poll taxes for voters in state elections. By this ruling, the Supreme Court banned the use of poll taxes in state elections.

Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment's federal protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and so applies to state governments too.

Reconstruction Amendments Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth amendments to the United States Constitution

The Reconstruction Amendments are the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth amendments to the United States Constitution, adopted between 1865 and 1870, the five years immediately following the Civil War. The last time the Constitution had been amended was with the Twelfth Amendment more than 60 years earlier in 1804. The Reconstruction amendments were a part of implementing the Reconstruction of the American South after the war. Their proponents saw them as transforming the United States from a country that was "half slave and half free" to one in which the constitutionally guaranteed "blessings of liberty" would be extended to the entire populace, including the former slaves and their descendants.

Three referendums were held simultaneously in Ireland on 25 November 1992, each on a proposed amendment of the Irish constitution. They were enumerated as the twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth amendments.

Cox v. New Hampshire, 312 U.S. 569 (1941), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, although the government cannot regulate the contents of speech, it can place reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech for the public safety. Here, the Court held that government may require organizers of any parade or procession on public streets to have a license and pay a fee.