No, Ma'am, That's Not History

Last updated

No Ma'am.png
First edition cover
Author Hugh Nibley
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject Mormon studies
GenreApologetics
Publisher Bookcraft
Publication date
1946
Media typePrint
Pages62
OCLC 4388256
LC Class BX8670.2 .B76 N42

No, Ma'am, That's Not History is a short work written by Hugh Nibley to criticize Fawn M. Brodie's biography of Joseph Smith, No Man Knows My History . Nibley accuses Brodie of inconsistency and improper historical methodology. Scholars have criticized No, Ma'am for using the same kind of hyperbole that Nibley critiques in Brodie. Nibley's defenders explain that his acerbic satire does use similar rhetorical tools as Brodie does, which is part of its attention-grabbing intent. In 1999, The Salt Lake Tribune said the book "was wildly popular in Utah". [1]

Contents

Background

Fawn Brodie's No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith (1945) had a mixed reception when it was first published. [2] Contemporary newspapers praised it as a definitive biography. In 1971, Marvin S. Hill wrote that the biography had long been considered "the standard work on the life of Joseph Smith." [2] Former Latter-day Saint and novelist Vardis Fisher wrote in 1945 that her work was an "excellent analysis" but her proposal that Smith was a self-interested fraud was pursued overzealously. [3] Latter-day Saint scholars, including Nibley, severely criticized the book. [4] No, Ma'am, That's Not History: A Brief Review of Mrs. Brodie's Reluctant Vindication of a Prophet She Seeks to Expose was published as a 62-page monograph published in 1946. Nibley wrote No, Ma'am as a personal project. [5] The work was reissued in 1959 as a pamphlet. [6] Nibley was highly educated in classical history and rhetoric. He did not specialize in American or Mormon history. [7] Nibley later wrote extensively about the "oriental" parallels of the Book of Mormon that he mentioned as an aside in No, Ma'am. [8]

Summary

Nibley accused Brodie of cherry-picking her arguments. In the case of the testimonies of Smith's neighbors, Nibley wrote that Brodie accepts their courtroom testimonies only when it suits her argument. Nibley described Brodie as misusing historical parallels and claimed that there were far better parallels to the Book of Mormon in "Oriental literature". [9]

Nibley criticized Brodie's description of Joseph Smith. He wrote that in her view, "Joseph Smith was a complete imposter... but he meant well." This was worse than a blatantly anti-Mormon view that Joseph Smith was totally depraved, because it was "more plausible". [10] Nibley wrote that "no blundering, dreaming, undisciplined, shallow and opportunistic fakir could have left behind what Joseph Smith did, both in men's hearts and on paper." [10] The proof that Brodie claimed for Joseph Smith's purported later fabrication of the first vision relied on an "argument of silence" – that newspapers had not mentioned Smith's first vision. Nibley argued that since Joseph Smith was an obscure farm boy, that it was unconvincing to expect newspapers to mention his experience at the time. He also wrote that things "of a transcendent and 'soul-shattering nature'" are not typically reported to the press. [11] He presented many counter-arguments to Brodie's arguments, using logic to show inconsistency or casting doubt on her sources. [12] He also criticized her psychohistorical method, stating that historians cannot know what hidden emotions Joseph or Emma Smith felt unless they have a source that says so. [13]

Reception

No, Ma'am positioned Nibley as a defender of the historicity of the Book of Mormon, impressing general authorities in the LDS Church. [14] The Salt Lake Tribune reports that it became "wildly popular" in Utah. [1] Outside the church, historians were not impressed with No, Ma'am. Dale Morgan, a historian who helped Brodie while she wrote the biography, found Nibley "intoxicated with his own language". Stanley S. Ivins, a critic of the Church's polygamy practices, criticized No, Ma'am for misrepresenting Brodie and Church history. Juanita Brooks stated that Nibley's zeal caused him to "make some statements almost as far fetched as [Brodie's]." [14] [15] In a letter to her parents, Brodie wrote that Nibley's critique was "a flippant and shallow piece". She further stated "If that [Nibley's critique] is the best a young Mormon historian can offer, then I am all the certain that the death of B. H. Roberts meant the end of all that was truly scholarly and honest in orthodox Mormon historiography." [16]

Later scholars expressed both criticism and admiration for No, Ma'am. Writing in 1989, Mormon historian Newell G. Bringhurst states that Nibley "made some rather extreme statements of his own"; for example: "The gospel as the Mormons know it sprang full-grown from the words of Joseph Smith. It has never been worked over or touched up in any way, and is free of revisions and alterations." [17] In his analysis of Nibley's treatment of Joseph Smith, Richard Bushman notices that No, Ma'am does not defend Joseph Smith's character, but rather, attacks Brodie's "scholarship and reasoning". Bushman said that the tract, oft-criticized for its sarcasm, was "a pleasure for me to discover on rereading it how on the mark it was." [18] In David J. Whittaker's 1991 forward to Nibley's collected apologetic works, he described Nibley's approach in his apologetic work as "biting satire" which "invokes some of the critics' own rhetorical standbys, such as ridicule and caricature" that is sometimes "dismissed as flippant". [19] Whittaker explained that Nibley focused on published criticism, and that many manuscript sources have since become available from the Church History Library and correct Nibley's arguments. These manuscript sources show the various accounts of Joseph Smith's first vision, and his involvement in money digging, including his trial in 1826. [20]

According to Ronald Helfrich, author of Mormon Studies: A Critical History, No, Ma'am was "a turning point in the history of Mormon apologetics and polemics" because it used academic language in its arguments. Nibley's patronizing language, Helfrich posited, could be a reflection of Nibley's own "patriarchalism and paternalism". [15] Nibley's rhetorical style became popular with defenders of the church. [15] In 1979, Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) was founded and published "Nibley-style apologetics and polemics". [15] The organization published FARMS Review from 1989 until 2011. FARMS Review describes itself as helping readers to "make informed choices and judgements" about books in Mormon studies. [21] Daniel Peterson, a BYU professor of Islamic studies, a former chairman of the board at FARMS, and a writer who followed in Nibley's apologetic tradition, called Nibley "the foremost apologist for Mormonism" during the latter half of the 20th century. [22] [23] Peterson described Nibley's approach to apologetics as an attitude that "the best defense is a good offense." [24] FARMS Review contained a review that Ron Priddis, who was the managing editor of Signature Books, [25] an independent Mormon publishing house, called "tabloid scholarship". [26] Signature Books published An Insider's View of Mormon Origins by Grant Palmer, a former LDS institute director; FARMS Review published five negative reviews of the book. In the book, Palmer discussed naturalistic explanations for Joseph Smith's production of scripture, including the Book of Mormon, as well as issues surrounding genetics and the Book of Mormon. In Davis Bitton's review in FARMS Review, he wondered how often Palmer attended church. Priddis called this "innuendo and character assassination" inappropriate for the venue of a scholarly review. [26] [27] [28]

Related Research Articles

In Mormonism, the restoration refers to a return of the authentic priesthood power, spiritual gifts, ordinances, living prophets and revelation of the primitive Church of Christ after a long period of apostasy. While in some contexts the term may also refer to the early history of Mormonism, in other contexts the term is used in a way to include the time that has elapsed from the church's earliest beginnings until the present day. Especially in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints "the restoration" is often used also as a term to encompass the corpus of religious messages from its general leaders down to the present.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fawn M. Brodie</span> American historian and biographer (1915–1981)

Fawn McKay Brodie was an American biographer and one of the first female professors of history at UCLA, who is best known for Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History (1974), a work of psychobiography, and No Man Knows My History (1945), an early biography of Joseph Smith, the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies</span> Mormon apologetics organization

The Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies (FARMS) was an informal collaboration of academics devoted to Latter-day Saint historical scholarship. The organization was established in 1979 as a non-profit organization by John. W. Welch. In 1997, the group became a formal part of Brigham Young University (BYU), which is owned and operated by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In 2006, the group became a formal part of the Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship, formerly known as the Institute for the Study and Preservation of Ancient Religious Texts, BYU. FARMS has since been absorbed into the Maxwell Institute's Laura F. Willes Center for Book of Mormon Studies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugh Nibley</span> Latter-day Saint religious scholar

Hugh Winder Nibley was an American scholar and member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints who was a professor at Brigham Young University (BYU) for nearly 50 years. He was a prolific author, and wrote apologetic works supporting the archaeological, linguistic, and historical claims of Joseph Smith. He was a member of the LDS Church, and wrote and lectured on LDS scripture and doctrinal topics, publishing many articles in the LDS Church magazines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Albert E. Bowen</span> American Mormon leader (1875–1953)

Albert Ernest Bowen was an American lawyer and Mormon religious leader who served as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

<i>No Man Knows My History</i> 1945 book by Fawn M. Brodie

No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith is a 1945 book by Fawn M. Brodie that was one of the first significant non-hagiographic biographies of Joseph Smith, the progenitor of the Latter Day Saint movement. No Man Knows My History was influential in the development of Mormon history as a scholarly field. However, scholars have since criticized the book for its methodological deficiencies, factual errors, and overt hostility to Smith.

<i>View of the Hebrews</i> Book by Ethan Smith

View of the Hebrews is an 1823 book written by Ethan Smith, a Congregationalist minister in Vermont, who argued that Native Americans were descended from the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel, a relatively common view during the early nineteenth century. Numerous commentators on Mormon history, from LDS Church general authority B. H. Roberts to Fawn M. Brodie, biographer of Joseph Smith, have noted similarities in the content of View of the Hebrews and the Book of Mormon, which was first published in 1830, seven years after Ethan Smith's book.

The teachings of Joseph Smith include a broad spectrum of religious doctrines as well as political and scientific ideas and theories, many of which he said were revealed to him by God. Joseph Smith is the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement and is recognized by multiple Latter Day Saint churches as the founder. Beginning in 1828, Smith began dictating the text of what later became the Book of Mormon, and also began dictating written revelations he said were inspired by God.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life of Joseph Smith from 1838 to 1839</span> Joseph Smiths life in Missouri

The life of Joseph Smith from 1838 to 1839, when he was 33–34 years old, covers a period beginning when Smith left Ohio in January 1838 until he left Missouri and moved to Nauvoo, Illinois in 1839.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life of Joseph Smith from 1839 to 1844</span> Final years of Joseph Smith, Jr.

The life of Joseph Smith from 1839 to 1844, when he was 34–38 years old, covers the period of Smith's life when he lived in Nauvoo, an eventful and highly controversial period of the Latter Day Saint movement. In 1844, after Smith was imprisoned in Carthage, Illinois, he was shot and killed when a mob stormed the jailhouse.

New Mormon history refers to a style of reporting the history of Mormonism by both Mormon and non-Mormon scholars which departs from earlier more polemical or faith-based styles of history. Rather than presenting material selectively to either prove or disprove Mormonism, the focus of new Mormon history is to present history in a more humanistic and dispassionate way, and to situate Mormon history in a fuller historical context. Because it is a break from past historical narratives, new Mormon history tends to be revisionist. In many cases, the new Mormon history follows the perspectives and techniques of new history, including cultural history. The Mormon historian Richard Bushman described it as "a quest for identity rather than a quest for authority." New Mormon historians include a wide range of both Mormon and non-Mormon scholars, the most prominent of which include Bushman, Jan Shipps, D. Michael Quinn, Terryl Givens, Leonard J. Arrington, Richard P. Howard, Fawn Brodie, and Juanita Brooks.

Todd Merlin Compton is an American historian in the fields of Mormon history and classics. Compton is a respected authority on the plural wives of the LDS Church founder, Joseph Smith.

Louis C. Midgley is a Mormon apologist and retired professor of political science at Brigham Young University. Since his retirement he has been closely involved with the Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, writing many book reviews, articles, and book chapters defending the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints from perceived critics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of the Book of Mormon</span>

The origins, authenticity, and historicity of the Book of Mormon have been subject to considerable criticism from scholars and skeptics since it was first published in 1830. The Book of Mormon is a sacred text of the Latter Day Saint movement, which adherents believe contains writings of ancient prophets who lived on the American continent from approximately 2200 BC to AD 421. It was first published in March 1830 by Joseph Smith as The Book of Mormon: An Account Written by the Hand of Mormon upon Plates Taken from the Plates of Nephi, who said that it had been written in otherwise unknown characters referred to as "reformed Egyptian" engraved on golden plates that he personally transcribed. Contemporary followers of the Latter Day Saint movement typically regard the text primarily as scripture, but also as a historical record of God's dealings with the ancient inhabitants of the Americas.

Mormon studies is the interdisciplinary academic study of the beliefs, practices, history and culture of individuals and denominations belonging to the Latter Day Saint movement, a religious movement associated with the Book of Mormon, though not all churches and members of the Latter Day Saint movement identify with the terms Mormon or Mormonism. Denominations of the Latter Day Saint movement include the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, by far the largest, as well as the Community of Christ (CoC) and other smaller groups, include some categorized under the umbrella term Mormon fundamentalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Smith</span> Founder of the Latter Day Saint movement (1805–1844)

Joseph Smith Jr. was an American religious leader and the founder of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement. He wrote and published the Book of Mormon at the age of 24, and attracted tens of thousands of followers by the time of his death fourteen years later. The religion he founded is followed to the present day by millions of global adherents and several churches, the largest of which is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Newell G. Bringhurst is an American historian and author of books and essays. Most of his writings have been about Mormonism— particularly topics and figures of controversy, such as blacks and the priesthood, Fawn Brodie, polygamy, and schisms within the LDS movement

This is a bibliography of works on the Latter Day Saint movement.

References

  1. 1 2 Wolfson, Hannah (September 7, 1999). "Biographer Brodie Is the Subject Of a New Book". The Salt Lake Tribune. p. B4. In 1946, Brigham Young University [p]rofessor Hugh Nibley wrote a pamphlet called, No Ma'am, That's Not History, which picked apart [Fawn] Brodie's thesis and was wildly popular in Utah. Continued from Wolfson, Hannah (September 7, 1999). "Now We Know Her History". The Salt Lake Tribune. p. B1.
  2. 1 2 Shipps 2007, pp. 499–500.
  3. ↑ Fisher 1945, p. 5.
  4. ↑ Shipps 2007, pp. 500.
  5. ↑ Petersen 2002 , p. 225; Spencer 2021 , p. 94
  6. ↑ Whittaker 1991, p. xv.
  7. ↑ Whittaker 1991, pp. xiii, xv.
  8. ↑ Spencer 2021, p. 95.
  9. ↑ Nibley 1946, p. 14.
  10. 1 2 Nibley 1946, p. 8.
  11. ↑ Nibley 1946 , pp. 21–24; Turner 2021 , p. 100
  12. ↑ Spencer 2021 , p. 95; Turner 2021 , p. 101
  13. ↑ "Since he betrayed nothing by look, word, or gesture of his inner feelings, we take the liberty to report that he was really thinking of a fishing trip made on his seventh birthday; there is no evidence for this, but of course his thoughts were perfectly concealed, you know." Nibley 1946 , p. 40; "When Joseph Smith faced Emma for the last time, 'he knew that she thought him a coward.' So Brodie knows that Emma knew that Joseph knew what Emma thought! Is this history?" Nibley 1946 , p. 54
  14. 1 2 Petersen 2002, pp. 225–227.
  15. 1 2 3 4 Helfrich 2021, p. 30.
  16. ↑ Turner 2021 , p. 101; Bringhurst 1996 , p. 56
  17. ↑ Nibley 1946 , pp. 61–62; interpretation and quote from Bringhurst 1996 , p. 56
  18. ↑ Bushman 2010, p. 9.
  19. ↑ Whittaker 1991, p. xiv.
  20. ↑ Whittaker 1991, p. xvi.
  21. ↑ "Mormon Studies Review". scholarsarchive.byu.edu. Brigham Young University. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
  22. ↑ Peterson, Daniel C. (February 4, 2010). "The need for apologetics; Hugh Nibley was foremost". Deseret News. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
  23. ↑ Peterson, Daniel (2021). "Nibley as an Apologist". Hugh Nibley Observed. The Interpreter Foundation in collaboration with Book of Mormon Central and FAIR. p. 170. ISBN   978-1-890718-93-0.
  24. ↑ De Groote, Michael (February 5, 2010). "Hugh Nibley's defense of truth". Deseret News. Retrieved February 7, 2023.
  25. ↑ "About Signature Books". signaturebooks.org. Signature Books. October 31, 2010. Archived from the original on October 31, 2010.
  26. 1 2 Priddis, Ron. "A Reply to FARMS and the Joseph Fielding Smith Institute". Signature Books. Archived from the original on January 29, 2007.
  27. ↑ "An Insider's View of Mormon Origins". Signature Books.
  28. ↑ Allen, James B. (2002). "An Insider's View of Mormon Origins". BYU Studies. 43 (2).

Works cited

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.