Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators | |
---|---|
Argued February 6,9–14, 16, 1795 Decided February 24, 1795 | |
Full case name | Penhallow, et al. v. Doane's Administrators |
Citations | 3 U.S. 54 ( more ) |
Holding | |
Federal district courts have the powers in prize causes that were formerly granted to the Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture under the Congress of the Articles of Confederation. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Paterson, joined by unanimous |
Penhallow v. Doane's Administrators, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 54 (1795), was a United States Supreme Court case about prize causes. It held that federal district courts have the powers that had been granted to the Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture under the Congress of the Articles of Confederation:
it was held that the Congress under the Confederation had power to erect a court of appeals in prize causes, that its decrees were conclusive, and that the district courts of the United States created under the Constitution have, as courts of admiralty, power to carry into effect the decrees of the former court of appeals in prize causes erected by the Congress of the Confederation. [1]
United States v. More, 7 U.S. 159 (1805), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it had no jurisdiction to hear appeals from criminal cases in the circuit courts by writs of error. Relying on the Exceptions Clause, More held that Congress's enumerated grants of appellate jurisdiction to the Court operated as an exercise of Congress's power to eliminate all other forms of appellate jurisdiction.
The former Court of Appeals in Cases of Capture, established by resolution of the Continental Congress on January 15, 1780, was the first federal court in the United States. The court had jurisdiction over cases for the capture of enemy ships and cargo.