The Historical Status of China's Tibet

Last updated

The Historical Status of China's Tibet is a book published in 1997 in English by China Intercontinental Press, the propaganda press for the government of the People's Republic of China. [1] [2] The book presents the Chinese government's official position on the history of Tibet and claims that Tibet has been under the sovereignty of China since the Yuan dynasty. [3]

Contents

Background

Given the de facto independence of Tibet in the first half of the twentieth century, the Chinese government is believed to be sensitive to the argument that its sovereignty over Tibet is illegitimate. [4]

As indicated in a postscript, the text of the first edition (1997) was the work of five co-authors: "The intro and Chapters 8-9 were rewritten by Wang Gui; Chapters 1-4 by Wu Wei; Chapters 5 and 7 by Yang Gyaincain; Chapters 6 and 12 by Xirab Nyima; and Chapters 10 and 11, as well as the Concluding Remarks by Tang Jiawei." It was a rewriting of an academic monograph entitled Comments on the Historical Status of Tibet that was co-authored by Wang Gui, Xirab Nyima and Tang Jiawei and published in 1995 by the Nationalities Press [5] [6]

The 1995 monograph itself was derived from an earlier Chinese response to Shakabpa's Tibet: A Political History authored by a team of Tibet-based writers and published by the Nationalities Publishing House in Beijing under a title that translates into English as Shakabpa's "Tibet: A Political History" and the True Face of Tibetan History. [4]

The listed co-authors "Wang Jiawei" (王家伟) and "Nyima Gyaincain" (尼玛 坚赞, pinyin: Nímǎ jiānzàn), are pseudonyms, derived from the combination of the names of the five contributors to the text (Wang Gui, Tang Jiawei, Wu Wei, Xirab Nyima, Yang Gyaincain) as indicated by a postscript to the book. [4] :414

Presentation

The book presents the official position of the People's Republic of China on the legal status of Tibet, i.e. the argument that, in one way or another, Tibet has always been a Chinese domain, roughly from the thirteenth century. [7] [8]

The book criticizes the interpretations and conclusions of The Status of Tibet: History, Rights and Prospects in International Law, [9] a 1987 book authored by Michael van Walt van Praag  [ fr ], who later became legal adviser to the 14th Dalai Lama. [10] It also questions the analysis of some important historical events made by Tibetan politician and historian Tsepon W. D. Shakabpa. [11] [12]

Other versions

Originally published in both Chinese and Tibetan in 1997 [13] as well as in English, [14] the book was translated and published in 2001 in French [15] and then in 2003 in German, [16] Spanish [17] and Russian. [18]

The Washington Institute of China Studies published the introduction and 8 chapters of the book (with abstracts) in its Vol. 4, No 1, 2009 to Vol. 7, No 1, 3012 issues of the Journal of the Washington Institute of Chinese Studies. [19]

Reception and analysis

According to Tibetologist John Powers, the book by Chinese authors was written to persuade Western readers that Tibetan claims of independence are unfounded and that historical facts show that Tibet has been part of China since time immemorial. [20]

Tibetologist Gray Tuttle lumps in the same category The Historical Status of China's Tibet on the one hand and Tibet: A Political History by W. D. Shakabpa and The Status of Tibet by Michael C. van Walt van Praag on the other hand : "the historiography associated with the “Tibet is a part of China” argument and with the “Tibetan independence” argument both project anachronistic ideas of nation-states and even western international law back into the past." [4] :416

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dalai Lama</span> Spiritual leader of Gelug Tibetan Buddhism

Dalai Lama is a title given by Altan Khan, the first Shunyi King of Ming China, in A.D. 1578 at Yanghua Monastery to the foremost spiritual leader of the Gelug or "Yellow Hat" school of Tibetan Buddhism, the newest and most dominant of the four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism. The 14th and incumbent Dalai Lama is Tenzin Gyatso, who lives in exile as a refugee in India. The Dalai Lama is considered to be the successor in a line of tulkus who are believed to be incarnations of Avalokiteśvara, the Bodhisattva of Compassion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panchen Lama</span> Prominent figure in Tibetan Buddhism

The Panchen Lama is a tulku of the Gelug school of Tibetan Buddhism. The Panchen Lama is one of the most important figures in the Gelug tradition, with its spiritual authority second only to the Dalai Lama. Along with the council of high lamas, he is in charge of seeking out the next Dalai Lama. Panchen is a portmanteau of Pandita and Chenpo, meaning "great scholar".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gyaincain Norbu</span> 11th Panchen Lama according to the Chinese government

Chökyi Gyalpo, also referred to by his secular name Gyaincain Norbu or Gyaltsen Norbu, is considered the 11th Panchen Lama by the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC). He is also the vice president of the Buddhist Association of China. Gyalpo is considered by critics to be a proxy of the Chinese government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gyantse</span> Place in Tibet Autonomous Region, Peoples Republic of China

Gyantse, officially Gyangzê Town, is a town located in Gyantse County, Shigatse Prefecture, Tibet Autonomous Region, China. It was historically considered the third largest and most prominent town in the Tibet region, but there are now at least ten larger Tibetan cities.

The Tibetan sovereignty debate refers to two political debates. The first political debate is about whether or not the various territories which are within the People's Republic of China (PRC) that are claimed as political Tibet should separate themselves from China and become a new sovereign state. Many of the points in this political debate rest on the points which are within the second historical debate, about whether Tibet was independent or subordinate to China during certain periods of its recent history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lhalu Tsewang Dorje</span> Tibetan aristocrat and politician (1914–2011)

Lhalu Tsewang Dorje commonly known as Lhalu, Lhalu Se, or Lhalu Shape, was a Tibetan aristocrat and politician who held a variety of positions in various Tibetan governments before and after 1951.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Basil Gould</span> British diplomat (1883–1956)

Sir Basil John Gould, CMG, CIE was a British Political Officer in Sikkim, Bhutan and Tibet from 1935 to 1945.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China</span> 1950–51 annexation of territory in Asia

Tibet came under the control of People's Republic of China (PRC) after the Government of Tibet signed the Seventeen Point Agreement which the 14th Dalai Lama ratified on 24 October 1951, but later repudiated on the grounds that he had rendered his approval for the agreement under duress. This occurred after attempts by the Tibetan Government to gain international recognition, efforts to modernize its military, negotiations between the Government of Tibet and the PRC, and a military conflict in the Chamdo area of western Kham in October 1950. The series of events came to be called the "Peaceful Liberation of Tibet" by the Chinese government, and the "Chinese invasion of Tibet" by the Central Tibetan Administration and the Tibetan diaspora.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert W. Ford</span> British radio officer (1923–2013)

Robert Webster Ford CBE was a British radio officer who worked in Tibet in the late 1940s. He was one of the few Westerners to be appointed by the Government of Tibet in the period of de facto independence between 1912 and the year 1950 when the Chinese army marched on Chamdo. He was arrested and jailed for five years by the Chinese. In 1994, he declared that he "had the opportunity to witness and experience at first hand the reality of Tibetan independence." In 1956 he was appointed at the British Diplomatic Service and served in the Foreign Office.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ming–Tibet relations</span> Relations between Ming-dynasty China and Tibet

The Ming dynasty considered Tibet to be part of the Western Regions. While the Ming dynasty at its height had some degree of influence in Tibet, the exact nature of their relations is under dispute by modern scholars. Analysis of the relationship is further complicated by modern political conflicts and the application of Westphalian sovereignty to a time when the concept did not exist. The Historical Status of China's Tibet, a book published by the People's Republic of China, asserts that the Ming dynasty had unquestioned sovereignty over Tibet by pointing to the Ming court's issuing of various titles to Tibetan leaders, Tibetans' full acceptance of the titles, and a renewal process for successors of these titles that involved traveling to the Ming capital. Scholars in China also argue that Tibet has been an integral part of China since the 13th century and so it was a part of the Ming Empire. However, most scholars outside China, such as Turrell V. Wylie, Melvyn C. Goldstein, and Helmut Hoffman, say that the relationship was one of suzerainty, Ming titles were only nominal, Tibet remained an independent region outside Ming control, and it simply paid tribute until the Jiajing Emperor, who ceased relations with Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tsepon W. D. Shakabpa</span> Tibetan politician

Tsepon Wangchuk Deden Shakabpa was a Tibetan nobleman, scholar, statesman and former Finance Minister of the government of Tibet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kashag</span> Governing council of Tibet from 1721 to 1959

The Kashag was the governing council of Tibet during the rule of the Qing dynasty and post-Qing period until the 1950s. It was created in 1721, and set by Qianlong Emperor in 1751 for the Ganden Phodrang in the 13-Article Ordinance for the More Effective Governing of Tibet. In that year the Tibetan government was reorganized after the riots in Lhasa of the previous year. The civil administration was represented by the Council (Kashag) after the post of Desi was abolished by the Qing imperial court. The Qing imperial court wanted the 7th Dalai Lama to hold both religious and administrative rule, while strengthening the position of the High Commissioners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tibet (1912–1951)</span> Former de facto state in East Asia

Tibet was a de facto independent state in East Asia that lasted from the collapse of the Qing dynasty in 1912 until its annexation by the People's Republic of China in 1951.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Battle of Chamdo</span> Military campaign by China to retake region in Tibet

The Battle of Chamdo occurred from 6 to 24 October 1950. It was a military campaign by the People's Republic of China (PRC) to take the Chamdo Region from a de facto independent Tibetan state. The campaign resulted in the capture of Chamdo and the annexation of Tibet by the People's Republic of China.

Events from the year 1860 in China.

Chen Qingying, is a Chinese Tibetologist. He is the director of the History Research Institute under the China Tibetology Research Center.

The 29-Article Ordinance for the More Effective Governing of Tibet, also called twenty-nine-article Imperial Ordinance, was an imperial decree concerning the governance of Tibet that was supposedly issued by the Qianlong Emperor of China's Qing dynasty in 1793. Article 1 stated that the purpose of the Golden Urn was to ensure the prosperity of Gelug, and to eliminate cheating and corruption in the selection process. Article 12 stated that relatives of the Dalai Lama or Panchen Lama must not hold government positions, or participate in political affairs.

The 13-Article Ordinance for the More Effective Governing of Tibet defined the political system of Tibet during the Qing dynasty of China. It was issued by the Qianlong Emperor in 1751.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sitting-in-the-bed</span> Tibetan Buddhist ceremony

Sitting-in-the-bed is a major religious ceremony in Tibetan Buddhist temples. It is a necessary ceremony for the reincarnated person to formally succeed the living Buddha by the reincarnated soul boy and change the name during the inheritance process of the living Buddha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liu Manqing</span> Chinese diplomat

Liu Manqing was a Tibetan and Chinese writer, diplomat, messenger, and interpreter, born in Tibet.

References

  1. China Intercontinental Press - CBI MEMBERS Archived 2018-11-24 at the Wayback Machine . China Book International
  2. "Wǔzhōu chuánbò zhōngxīn (wǔzhōu chūbǎn shè)" 五洲传播中心(五洲出版社) [Intercontinental Communication Center (Intercontinental Publishing House)]. The State Council Information Office of the People's Republic of China (中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室) (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2018-11-24.
  3. 中国西藏的历史地位 引言 [Introduction to The Historical Status of China's Tibet] (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2004-11-25. Retrieved 2018-06-21.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Gray Tuttle, Using Zhu Yuanzhang's Communications with Tibetans to Justify PRC Rule in Tibet Archived 2017-10-13 at the Wayback Machine , p. 413-429, in Sarah Schneewind ed., Long live the Emperor! Uses of the Ming Founder across Six Centuries of East Asian History, Ming Studies Research Series, No 4, Center for Early Modern History, 2008. ISBN   978-0980063905
  5. Postscript Archived 2017-10-12 at the Wayback Machine .
  6. That monograph is cited as "Wang, G., Xiraonima, Tang, J. 1995. Comments on the Historical Status of Tibet" Archived 2017-10-10 at the Wayback Machine by Chinese scholars Xu Mingxu and Yuan Feng, in "The Tibet Question: A New Cold War," in Barry Sautman, June Teufel Dreyer eds., Contemporary Tibet: Politics, Development and Society in a Disputed Region, Routledge, 2017, 386 p., 2017 (1st edition 2005).
  7. Thomas Laird, The Story of Tibet: Conversations with the Dalai Lama, Grove/Atlantic, Inc, 2007, 496 p., p. 106: "Wang Jiawei et Nyima Gyaincain present the government's viewpoint in the Historical Status of China's Tibet."
  8. José Raimundo Noras, « O Tibete entre impérios: formação e sobrevivência de uma identidade cultural. Ensaio bibliográfico » Archived 2017-10-02 at the Wayback Machine , Ler História [Online], 69, 2016, posto online no dia 07 Março 2017: "O ponto de vista chinês no debate sobre a «questão tibetana» também tem sido explorado por alguns autores, quase todos chineses. A doutrina oficial da República Popular da China nasce da argumentação segundo a qual, de uma forma ou de outra, o Tibete sempre foi um domínio chinês, sensivelmente, a partir do século XIII. É esta perspetiva histórica – com algum fundamento, como vimos sobretudo no que respeita ao período posterior ao século XVII – que é defendida por Jiawei Wang e Nyima Gyaincain no livro The Historical Status of China’s Tibet23. Essa obra constitui uma espécie de «história oficial chinesa» do «estatuto político» do Tibete." (The Chinese point of view in the debate on the 'Tibetan issue' has also been explored by some authors, almost all Chinese. The official doctrine of the People's Republic of China arises from the argument that, in one way or another, Tibet has always been a Chinese domain, roughly from the thirteenth century. It is this historical perspective – with some foundation, as we saw above all in regard to the period after the seventeenth century – which is advocated by Jiawei Wang and Nyima Gyaincain in The Historical Status of China's Tibet. This work constitutes a kind of 'official Chinese history' of Tibet's 'political status'.)
  9. London: Wisdom, 1987.
  10. Derek F. Maher, Ph.D., Translator's Preface, pp. xi-xxxiii, in Tsepon Wangchuck Deden Shakabpa, One Hundred Thousand Moons (2 vols.): An Advanced Political History of Tibet, Brill, 2009, p.xix: "Likewise, a similar thorough-going critique, perhaps written by the same people, was directed at Michael C. van Walt van Praag's very careful examination of Tibet's status in international law. i." - [i, p. xx] "Michael C. van Walt van Praag, The Status of Tibet: History, Rights, and Prospects in International Law (London: Wisdom, 1987). The critique is published in English as Wang Jiawei and Nyima Gyaincain, The Historical Status of China's Tibet (Beijing: China Intercontinental Press, 1997)."
  11. Wangchuk Deden Shakabpa, Tibet: A Political History, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1967.
  12. José Elías Esteve Moltó, op. cit.: “A historical review of Tibet's legal status that supports China's official view and openly criticizes the legal interpretations and conclusions in van Walt van Praag 1987. It also questions the analysis of important historical events made by the Tibetan politician and historian Shakabpa.”
  13. José Elías Esteve Moltó, Tibet Archived 2015-11-17 at the Wayback Machine , Oxford Bibliographies: "Original work published in Chinese and Tibetan with the title, The Historical Status of China’s Tibet (Beijing: China Intercontinental, 1997)."
  14. The historical status of China's Tibet. China Intercontinental Press. 1997. ISBN   9787801133045. Archived from the original on 2017-10-21.
  15. Jiawei Wang et Nimajianzan, Le statut du Tibet de Chine dans l'histoire, Beijing, China Intercontinental Press, 2001 ( ISBN   978-7-5085-0259-5).
  16. Historische Koordinaten Chinas Tibets, Beijing, China Intercontinental Press, 2003 ( ISBN   9787508502571).
  17. El estatus histórico del Tíbet de China, Beijing, China Intercontinental Press, 2003 ( ISBN   9787508502588).
  18. (ru) 王家伟 et 尼玛坚赞 (trad. Нимацянцзан Ван Цзявэй), Исторический статус Тибета Китая, Beijing, Изд-во "Пять континентов", 2003 ( ISBN   9787508502816).
  19. See Vol. 4, No 1, 2009 Archived 2017-10-02 at the Wayback Machine and Vol. 7, No 1, 3012 Archived 2017-10-02 at the Wayback Machine .
  20. John Powers, History As Propaganda: Tibetan Exiles versus the People's Republic of China Archived 2017-10-01 at the Wayback Machine , Oxford University Press, 2004, 224 p., p. 9: "These statements indicate the sort of actions in which Chinese authors believe themselves to be engaged. Their writings are intended to persuade a Western audience that claims of Tibetan independence are false and that an unbiased examination of "historical facts" will reveal that Tibet has been an integral part of China since time immemorial."

Bibliography