Thomas Borthwick & Sons (Australasia) Ltd v South Otago Freezing Co Ltd

Last updated

Thomas Borthwick & Sons (Australasia) Ltd v South Otago Freezing Co Ltd
Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
Court Court of Appeal of New Zealand
Full case nameThomas Borthwick & Sons (Australasia) Ltd v South Otago Freezing Co Ltd
Decided21 December 1977
Citation(s)[1978] 1 NZLR 538
Court membership
Judge(s) sittingRichmond P, Woodhouse, Cooke

Thomas Borthwick & Sons (Australasia) Ltd v South Otago Freezing Co Ltd [1978] 1 NZLR 538 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the remedy of an injunction for a breach of contract. [1] [2]

New Zealand Country in Oceania

New Zealand is a sovereign island country in the southwestern Pacific Ocean. The country geographically comprises two main landmasses—the North Island, and the South Island —and around 600 smaller islands. It has a total land area of 268,000 square kilometres (103,500 sq mi). New Zealand is situated some 2,000 kilometres (1,200 mi) east of Australia across the Tasman Sea and roughly 1,000 kilometres (600 mi) south of the Pacific island areas of New Caledonia, Fiji, and Tonga. Because of its remoteness, it was one of the last lands to be settled by humans. During its long period of isolation, New Zealand developed a distinct biodiversity of animal, fungal, and plant life. The country's varied topography and its sharp mountain peaks, such as the Southern Alps, owe much to the tectonic uplift of land and volcanic eruptions. New Zealand's capital city is Wellington, while its most populous city is Auckland.

Breach of contract

Breach of contract is a legal cause of action and a type of civil wrong, in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one or more of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other party's performance. Breach occurs when a party to a contract fails to fulfill its obligation(s) as described in the contract, or communicates an intent to fail the obligation or otherwise appears not to be able to perform its obligation under the contract. Where there is breach of contract, the resulting damages will have to be paid by the party breaching the contract to the aggrieved party.

Related Research Articles

Peter Whittle is a mathematician and statistician, working in the fields of stochastic nets, optimal control, time series analysis, stochastic optimisation and stochastic dynamics. From 1967 to 1994, he was the Churchill Professor of Mathematics for Operational Research at the University of Cambridge.

<i>NZ Shipping Co Ltd v A M Satterthwaite & Co Ltd</i>

New Zealand Shipping Co. Ltd. v. A. M. Satterthwaite & Co. Ltd., or The Eurymedon is a leading case on contract law by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. This 1974 case establishes the conditions when a third party may seek the protection of an exclusion clause in a contract between two parties.

<i>Bisset v Wilkinson</i>

Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177 is a leading contract law case from New Zealand on the issue of misrepresentation. The case establishes that a mere misstatement of opinion given fairly cannot amount to a misrepresentation.

<i>DHL International (NZ) Ltd v Richmond Ltd</i>

DHL International (NZ) Ltd v Richmond Ltd [1993] 3 NZLR 10 Is a leading case in New Zealand case law allowing exclusion of liability clauses even for fundamental breach. It effectively incorporates the English case of Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd [1980] AC 827 into New Zealand case law.

<i>Provost Developments Ltd v Collingwood Towers Ltd</i>

Provost Developments Ltd v Collingwood Towers Ltd [1980] 2 NZLR 205 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding "subject to solicitor's approval" clauses in conditional contracts.

<i>McElroy Milne v Commercial Electronics Ltd</i>

McElroy Milne v Commercial Electronics Ltd [1993] 1 NZLR 39 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding remoteness of damages for the remedy of damages for breach of contract.

<i>Newmans Tours Ltd v Ranier Investments Ltd</i>

Newmans Tours Ltd v Ranier Investments Ltd [1992] 2 NZLR 68; aff'd sub nom is a cited case in New Zealand regarding relief under the Contractual Remedies Act 1979 where a contract is repudiated by one of the parties.

<i>McLaren Maycroft & Co v Fletcher Development Co Ltd</i>

McLaren Maycroft & Co v Fletcher Development Co Ltd [1973] 2 NZLR 100 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding concurrent duties in contract and tort, ruling that in situations where there is a contract, the parties can not pursue any claim in tort. This has been subsequently overruled in Price Waterhouse v Kwan

<i>Barrett v IBC International Ltd</i>

Barrett v IBC International Ltd [1995] 3 NZLR 160 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the legal concept of certainty regarding contract formation.

<i>Woods v N J Ellingham & Co Ltd</i>

Woods v N J Ellingham & Co Ltd [1977] 1 NZLR 218 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding implied terms in a contract.

<i>Paulger v Butland Industries Ltd</i>

Paulger v Butland Industries Ltd [1989] 3 NZLR 549 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding mutual mistake.

<i>McKinlay Hendry Ltd v Tonkin & Taylor Ltd</i>

McKinlay Hendry Ltd v Tonkin & Taylor Ltd is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the Contracts (Privity) Act 1982 and pre-incorporation contracts.

<i>MacIndoe v Mainzeal Group Ltd</i>

MacIndoe v Mainzeal Group Ltd [1991] 3 NZLR 273 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the legal enforcebility of a contract where there is a breach of a stipulation.

<i>Markholm Construction Co Ltd v Wellington City Council</i>

Markholm Construction Co Ltd v Wellington City Council [1985] 2 NZLR 520 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding contract formation.

<i>Saunderson v Purchase</i> legal case

Saunderson v Purchase [1958] NZLR 588 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the joining of 2 documents to form a written contract under the Contracts Enforcement Act [1956], and reinforces the English case of Timmins v Moreland Street Property Co Ltd [1958] Ch 110.

<i>Gulf Corporation Ltd v Gulf Harbour Investments Ltd</i>

Gulf Corporation Ltd v Gulf Harbour Investments Ltd [2005] NZCA 121 ; [2006] 1 NZLR 21; (2005) 6 NZCPR 412 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the termination of conditional contracts.

<i>Fenton v Scottys Car Sales Ltd</i>

Fenton v Scotty's Car Sales Ltd [1968] NZLR 929 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the legality of illegal contracts that pre date the Illegal Contracts Act 1970.

<i>Bradley West Solicitors Nominee Co Ltd v Keeman</i>

Bradley West Solicitors Nominee Co Ltd v Keeman (1994) 2 NZLR 111 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the common law remedy of rectification.

<i>Isaac Naylor & Sons Ltd v NZ Co-op Wool Marketing Assoc Ltd</i>

Isaac Naylor & Sons Ltd v NZ Co-op Wool Marketing Assoc Ltd [1981] 1 NZLR 361 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding remoteness of loss for damages. This case reinforces the English case of The Herron II; Koufos v C Czarnikow Ltd [1969] 1 AC 350 into NZ case law.

<i>Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd</i>

Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd is a cited case in New Zealand regarding repudiation.

References

  1. Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. [ page needed ]. ISBN   0-86472-555-8.
  2. Walker, Campbell (2004). Butterworths Student Companion Contract (4th ed.). LexisNexis. p. 258. ISBN   0-408-71770-X.