View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11

Last updated

Thomas Hoepker: View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11 (2001) Thomas Hoeker, View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9-11.jpg
Thomas Hoepker: View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11 (2001)

View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11 is a color photograph by German photographer Thomas Hoepker. It shows five people sitting on the banks of the East River in the Williamsburg neighborhood of the New York City Borough of Brooklyn while a cloud of smoke rises over Manhattan in the background. It emanates from the collapsed towers of the World Trade Center, which had been the target of a terrorist attack that day.

Contents

Hoepker initially refrained from publishing the photograph because the pictured people seemed too unaffected by the events. The photo was presented to the public for the first time in 2005 at the Munich City Museum in an exhibition of Hoepker's work. In September 2006, an article in the New York Times triggered a controversy about the interpretation of the photograph in the United States, in which two of the depicted people also spoke out and stated that they had talked about the attacks while the image was taken. Subsequently, art historians and media studies scholars also addressed the photograph.

Creation

The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center after the impact of the two airplanes WTC smoking on 9-11.jpeg
The Twin Towers of the World Trade Center after the impact of the two airplanes

On the morning of September 11, 2001, flights AA11 and UA175 left Logan International Airport in Boston with destination Los Angeles International Airport. Both planes were hijacked by members of the Islamist al-Qaeda terrorist network, and were flown into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City at 8:46 and 9:03 a.m., respectively. Thomas Hoepker, a German photographer living in New York, was informed of the first attack by a colleague and shortly thereafter left his apartment on the Upper East Side to go to the scene of the attack. Since the subway was no longer running, he tried to go there by car. Because of heavy traffic and road closures, he used a detour through Queens and Brooklyn. On the way, he arrived at an Italian restaurant on the East River near the Williamsburg Bridge, on whose garden terrace the View from Williamsburg and two other shots of the same subject were taken. He took the photos with his Canon EOS analog camera and Fujichrome slide film. [1] By this time, both towers had collapsed. [2] He then continued toward the Manhattan Bridge to get to the disaster site. As a result of the road closure, he could only walk onto the bridge. Here he took more photos. [1]

Description

In the foreground of the photo, a group of five people sits on the bank of the East River, bathed in bright sunlight. Two women are in front on the left, one is sitting on a chair, and the other is squatting on the ground. In the center, a man sits on a bench with a red bicycle in front of him. Next to him, a woman and a man are sitting on a wooden parapet. The man on the parapet has obviously gotten the word, the others turn to him attentively. The poses of the five people seem relaxed. The posture of the woman on the parapet seems especially casual and gives the impression that she is sunbathing. [3] The group is framed by two dark green conifers or cypresses. The center of the background shows the overlapping silhouettes of the Manhattan Bridge and the Brooklyn Bridge. A large cloud of smoke emanates from the southern tip of Manhattan. Together with a series of pilings and planks in the water, it forms a triangle that appears to point to the source of the smoke. [4] None of the people depicted look at the smoke.

Publication and reactions

In the days following the attacks, Hoepker met with colleagues from his agency Magnum Photos to review their photographs of the events and to discuss how to deal with them. They decided to produce a photobook, and Hoepker was appointed editor in charge. The book was published in the same year. Hoepker contributed three photographs he had taken from the Manhattan Bridge. [5] The View from Williamsburg was missing from the book. In a later statements, Hoepker said the reason for this self-censorship was that the photograph "didn't live up to the drama of the other shots", seemed "too pretty", [6] and thus might "distort the reality as we had felt it on that historic day". [5]

The photograph was displayed publicly for the first time in 2005, as part of an exhibition of Thomas Hoepker's 50 years of work presented at the Munich City Museum between November 25 and May 28, 2006. The retrospective was also shown at the Museum für Kunst und Gewerbe Hamburg and the C/O Berlin in 2006 and 2007. In the accompanying exhibition catalog, the View from Williamsburg occupies a special position: it is both shown on the cover and it is the first photograph in the book. [7] In the extensive German press coverage of the exhibition, the photo also clearly stood out from the total of about 200 images shown. In particular, the apparent unconcern of the five pictured people became the target of media commentary. For example, for Freddy Langer of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung Hoepker's photograph raised the question of "how dramatically a photograph must be constructed today if some viewer is unmoved even by the gruesome reality." [8] A similar opinion was expressed by Matthias Reichelt  [ de ] in Die Tageszeitung , for whom the picture "offers reason to reflect on distance and closeness, blunting and empathy for violence and catastrophes in the 21st century." [9]

In 2006, U.S. media also dealt with the photo. That year it appeared in the book Watching the World Change by David Friend, which illuminates the stories behind the images of 9/11. In the book, Hoepker expressed the view that the people in the photo had not been moved by the events. This was picked up by Frank Rich in a guest editorial for the New York Times on the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the attacks. He complained about his compatriots not having learned from the attacks and of, as usual in the U.S., moving on from it too quickly. In this context, he refers to Hoepker's photo, which he sees as anticipating this development. From his point of view, the people appear to be chatting and enjoying the sun. In doing this, he says, they are not necessarily callous but just American. [10] Shortly thereafter, David Plotz contradicted Rich's views on the photograph in an article in the online magazine Slate . To him, the people in the photo appeared to be discussing the attacks. At the end of the article, he asked the persons pictured to contact the editor to express their views. [11] Walter Sipser and Chris Schiavo were able to prove with recent images that they were the people sitting on the parapet to the right. The two, who had been a couple at the time the photo was taken, clarified that they had been shocked by the attacks and had talked about the event with the other people whom they did not know. Hoepker would have been able to determine this if he had come up to them that day and asked permission to take a photo. [2] Hoepker later commented that he had deliberately not approached the people in the picture: "As a photojournalist, I do everything I can not to influence the events I am witnessing. If you were to start a conversation or ask permission, you would change any authentic situation in an instant." [12]

Analysis

Claude Monet - Jardin a Sainte-Adresse.jpg
Garden at Sainte-Adresse
Landschaft mit Sturz des Ikarus Pieter Breughel d A.jpg
Landscape with the Fall of Icarus

The art historian Michael Diers assigns the View from Williamsburg to the genre of conversation pieces, which was popular especially in 18th-century England as a form of family and social portrait and later was supplanted by photography. The focus of the paintings was often on a group of people in conversation in a landscape, as is the case with Hoepker's photograph. [13] In addition, the photograph resembles standard motifs of impressionist plein air painting in its subject and structure. As an example, Diers cites the painting Garden at Sainte-Adresse by the French painter Claude Monet. It shows two couples sitting in the foreground on a sunlit terrace separated from the sea by a fence. The background shows plumes of smoke from passing steamboats. As Diers says, Monet's painting radiates balance and tranquility through its construction, while Hoepker's photograph emanates a certain restlessness through the slight slant of the parapet. To Diers, the resulting irritation is supported by the large column of smoke. [14]

Hoepker himself also compared his photograph to a painting. In an interview published in the book Watching the World Change before the debate in the U.S. media, he sees similarities with the painting Landscape with the Fall of Icarus , attributed to the Flemish painter Pieter Bruegel the Elder. To him this painting shows an idyllic landscape with something terrible happening in the background, just like his photograph. Part of the painting are a farmer, a shepherd and a fishermen. The three do not pay attention to the fall of Icarus into the sea, which can be seen on the lower right, just as the people in the photo gave Hoepker the impression of not being interested in the catastrophe in the background. [15]

Related Research Articles

<i>Bild</i> German tabloid published by Axel Springer AG

Bild is a German tabloid newspaper published by Axel Springer SE. The paper is published from Monday to Saturday; on Sundays, its sister paper Bild am Sonntag is published instead, which has a different style and its own editors. Bild is tabloid in style but broadsheet in size. It is the best-selling European newspaper and has the sixteenth-largest circulation worldwide. Bild has been described as "notorious for its mix of gossip, inflammatory language, and sensationalism" and as having a huge influence on German politicians. Its nearest English-language stylistic and journalistic equivalent is often considered to be the British national newspaper The Sun, the second-highest-selling European tabloid newspaper.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gerhard Richter</span> German visual artist (born 1932)

Gerhard Richter is a German visual artist. Richter has produced abstract as well as photorealistic paintings, and also photographs and glass pieces. He is widely regarded as one of the most important contemporary German artists and several of his works have set record prices at auction.

<i>Guernica</i> (Picasso) 1937 oil painting by Pablo Picasso

Guernica is a large 1937 oil painting by Spanish artist Pablo Picasso. It is one of his best-known works, regarded by many art critics as the most moving and powerful anti-war painting in history. It is exhibited in the Museo Reina Sofía in Madrid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tourist guy</span> Internet phenomenon related to the September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center

The "tourist guy" was an internet phenomenon that featured a photograph of a tourist on the observation deck of the World Trade Center digitally altered to show a plane about to hit the tower in the background during the September 11 attacks. The photo went viral in the days after the attacks as many manipulated pictures spread online. The man in the photograph was identified as Hungarian Péter Guzli, who took the photo in 1997. Guzli said he edited the photo as a joke for his friends and did not intend for it to spread across the internet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ralph Morse</span>

Ralph Theodore Morse was a career staff photographer for Life magazine. He photographed some of the most widely seen pictures of World War II, the United States space program, and sports events, and was celebrated for his multiple-exposure photographs. Morse's success as an improviser led to his being considered Life magazine's specialist in technical photography. Former managing editor George P. Hunt declared that "If [the] equipment he needed didn't exist, [Morse] built it."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spirit photography</span> Attempt to capture images of ghosts or spirits

Spirit photography is a type of photography whose primary goal is to capture images of ghosts and other spiritual entities, especially in ghost hunting. It dates back to the late 19th century. The end of the American Civil War and the mid-19th Century Spiritualism movement contributed greatly to the popularity of spirit photography. Photographers such as William Mumler and William Hope ran thriving businesses taking photos of people with their supposed dead relatives. Both were shown to be frauds, but "true believers", such as Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, refused to accept the evidence as proof of a hoax.

<i>The Falling Man</i> Photograph from 9/11 attacks taken by Richard Drew

The Falling Man is a photograph taken by Associated Press photographer Richard Drew of a man falling from the World Trade Center during the September 11 attacks in New York City. The unidentified man in the image was trapped on the upper floors of the North Tower, and it is unclear whether he fell while searching for safety or he jumped to escape the fire and smoke. The photograph was taken at exactly 9:41:15 A.M. on the day of the attacks.

The 2006 Lebanon War photographs controversies refers to instances of photojournalism from the 2006 Lebanon War that misrepresented scenes of death and destruction in Lebanon caused by Israeli air attacks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banquet photography</span> Photography of large groups of people with the objective of commemorating an event

Banquet photography is the photography of large groups of people, typically in a banquet setting such as a hotel or club banquet room, with the objective of commemorating an event. Clubs, associations, unions, circuses and debutante balls have all been captured by banquet photographers.

Michael Wolf was a German born artist and photographer who captured daily life in big cities. His work takes place primarily in Hong Kong and Paris and focuses on architectural patterns and structures, as well as the documentation of human life and interaction in the city. Wolf has published multiple photo books, has had his work exhibited widely around the world, has permanent collections across Germany and the United States, and has won three World Press Photo Awards from 2005 to 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Willy Stöwer</span> German painter

Willy Stöwer was a German artist, illustrator and author during the Imperial Period. He is best known for nautical paintings and lithographs. Many of his works depict historical maritime events such as the sinking of the RMS Titanic in 1912.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Hoepker</span>

Thomas Hoepker is a German photographer and member of Magnum Photos. He is known for stylish color photo features. He also documented the 9/11 World Trade Center destruction. Hoepker originally made a name for himself in the 1960s as a photojournalist with a desire to photograph human conditions.

<i>Bloody Saturday</i> (photograph) Photograph by H. S. Wong

Bloody Saturday is a black-and-white photograph taken on 28 August 1937, a few minutes after a Japanese air attack struck civilians during the Battle of Shanghai in the Second Sino-Japanese War. Depicting a Chinese baby crying within the bombed-out ruins of Shanghai South railway station, the photograph became known as a cultural icon demonstrating Japanese wartime atrocities in China. The photograph was widely published, and in less than a month had been seen by more than 136 million viewers. The photographer, Hearst Corporation's H. S. "Newsreel" Wong, also known as Wong Hai-Sheng or Wang Xiaoting, did not discover the identity or even the sex of the injured child, whose mother lay dead nearby. The baby was called Ping Mei. One of the most memorable war photographs ever published, and perhaps the most famous newsreel scene of the 1930s, the image stimulated an outpouring of Western anger against Japanese violence in China. Journalist Harold Isaacs called the iconic image "one of the most successful 'propaganda' pieces of all time".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hubert Sattler (painter)</span> Austrian painter (1817–1904)

Hubert Sattler was an Austrian painter who also signed works with the pseudonyms Louis Ritschard, E. Grossen, and Gottfried Stähly-Rychen. He traveled widely and was noted for large and minutely detailed cosmorama paintings of cities, monuments, and landscapes of many countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Hisgen</span> German painter

Daniel Hisgen was a German painter of the rococo period who worked as a church painter in Upper Hesse, specializing on cycles of paintings decorating the front of the gallery parapet in churches with an upper gallery. His discreet cycles demonstrate the modest prominence expected of Lutheran art in German churches of his day, taking a middle route between the large and prominent images in Catholic churches, and the complete absence of images in Calvinist ones.

Cathedral Square, Milan is a 1968 painting by Gerhard Richter. The photorealistic painting is one of Richter's largest figurative paintings at 2,75 m x 2,90 m. It depicts Milan's Cathedral Square between the Galleria Vittorio Emanuele and the Milan Cathedral. It was sold by Sotheby's in New York on 14 May 2013 for 37.1 Million dollars, breaking Richter's own record price for an artwork by a living artist, his 1994 32.4 million dollar painting Abstraktes Bild (809-1).

18. Oktober 1977 is the title of a series of paintings by Gerhard Richter. It is based on photographs that document the deaths of three leading terrorists of the Baader-Meinhof Group in the Stammheim Prison after the release of the hostages in the hijacking by four members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine of Lufthansa Flight 181. The series shows events from a period of several years, from the capture of the terrorists to their burial. A youth portrait of Ulrike Meinhof occupies a special position.

During the September 11 attacks of 2001, a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda, killed 2,977 people, injured over 6,000, and caused at least $10 billion in infrastructure and property damage. Multiple others have died due to 9/11-related cancer and respiratory diseases in the months and years following the attacks, leading the numbers impacted to continually shift to reflect the new numbers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Kellner</span>

Thomas Kellner is a German fine-art photographer, lecturer and curator. He became known above all for his large-format photographs of famous architectural monuments, which, through many individual images and a shifted camera perspective, look like "photo mosaics".

<i>Arrest of a suspect in Sarajevo</i> Iconic photograph from July 1914

Arrest of a suspect in Sarajevo, also erroneously known as The arrest of Gavrilo Princip, is a historically significant photograph capturing the immediate aftermath of the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria and his wife Sophie in Sarajevo on 28 June 1914.

References

  1. 1 2 Diers 2016, pp. 129–130, 335 (footnote 22).
  2. 1 2 "It's Me in That 9/11 Photo". Slate. September 13, 2006. Retrieved December 28, 2019.
  3. Diers 2016, p. 133.
  4. Diers 2016, p. 132.
  5. 1 2 Hoepker, Thomas (September 14, 2006). "I Took That 9/11 Photo". Slate . Retrieved December 28, 2019.
  6. Friend, David (2006). Watching the World Change. The Stories Behind the Images of 9/11. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. pp. 142–143. ISBN   978-0-374-29933-0. Cited in: Diers 2016 , pp. 130–131
  7. Diers 2016, pp. 123, 334 (footnote 2).
  8. Langer, Freddy (January 14, 2006). "Das Unglück anderer ist das Unglück aller". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). No. 12. p. 33. Vielmehr stellt Höpker mit dem Bild die Frage, wie dramatisch ein Foto heute konstruiert sein muß, wenn manchen Betrachter selbst die grausige Wirklichkeit ungerührt läßt.
  9. Reichelt, Matthias (March 3, 2006). "Der große Bilderfabrikant". Die Tageszeitung (in German). p. 16. Auf diese Weise ist ihm ein Bild gelungen, das Anlass bietet, über Distanz und Nähe, Abstumpfung und Empathie für Gewalt und Katastrophen im 21. Jahrhundert zu reflektieren.
  10. Rich, Frank (September 10, 2006). "Whatever Happened to the America of 9/12?". The New York Times. Retrieved December 28, 2019.
  11. Plotz, David (September 12, 2006). "Frank Rich Is Wrong About That 9/11 Photograph". Slate. Retrieved December 28, 2019.
  12. Denker, Thomas (September 9, 2011). "Raserei und Stillstand: Thomas Hoepkers 9/11-Foto und seine Geschichte". Der Tagesspiegel (in German). Retrieved October 29, 2022. Als Fotojournalist setze ich alles daran, die Ereignisse, deren Zeuge ich bin, nicht zu beeinflussen. Würde man ein Gespräch beginnen oder um Erlaubnis bitten, dann würde man jede authentische Situation im Nu verändern.
  13. Diers 2016, p. 135.
  14. Diers 2016, p. 136–137.
  15. Friend, David (2006). Watching the World Change. The Stories Behind the Images of 9/11. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 143. ISBN   978-0-374-29933-0. Cited in: Peeters 2009 , pp. 209–210

Bibliography