Arthur Schopenhauer's view on animal rights

Last updated

Arthur Schopenhauer was an early defender of animal rights. Arthur Schopenhauer by J Schafer, 1859b.jpg
Arthur Schopenhauer was an early defender of animal rights.

Arthur Schopenhauer was a 19th-century German philosopher. He was an early defender of animal rights, going against the prevailing idea at the time that animals had no rights and only had instrumental value to humans. According to Schopenhauer, "The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality." [1] Schopenhauer argued that animals should be treated with respect and compassion, as they, like humans, are subjected to the metaphysical will, and experience suffering and craving as a result.

Contents

Background

Animals have been supposed to have lesser rights than humans from the beginning of history, with a few exceptions in some philosophical and religious traditions. Arthur Schopenhauer, having been influenced by the philosophical school of thought of Buddhism, came to the conclusion that animals are subjected to a form of metaphysical Will and that they are therefore subject to suffering and craving. [2] [3]

Influence of Buddhism

Buddhism had a deep influence on Schopenhauer's philosophy Dharma Wheel.svg
Buddhism had a deep influence on Schopenhauer's philosophy

Arthur Schopenhauer, who had been strongly influenced by the Buddhist tradition in his philosophy of the Will, [4] would argue thereafter that animals do have rights that should be respected, as they are beings driven by craving and subject to The Will. Schopenhauer says that due to The Will contained in animals, they should be treated kindly, as there is not only an ethical component involved but even a person's character is altered by how he treats non-human animals. According to Schopenhauer: "Since compassion for animals is so intimately associated with goodness of character, it may be confidently asserted that whoever is cruel to animals cannot be a good man." [5] and finally, that "Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality", echoing Buddhist views on animal ethics. [6] However, Schopenhauer did not openly advocate for vegetarianism. Arthur Schopenhauer has often been referred to as "The First European Buddhist" [7] [8] due to how similar his beliefs were to Buddhist philosophy.

Influence of Hinduism

Schopenhauer's philosophy was influenced by Hinduism, which preached for a fairer treatment of animals Hindu Symbols2.png
Schopenhauer's philosophy was influenced by Hinduism, which preached for a fairer treatment of animals

Schopenhauer had a profound interest in studying the Hindu philosophies, which held that animals should be treated with a minimum of respect. His poodle dogs, of which Schopenhauer was fond of, were named "Atman", in reference to the Sanskrit word "Atman", which means "Self" or "soul". Schopenhauer believed that, since animals have a Will similar to that humans do, [9] it is pertinent that they be treated with compassion. According to Schopenhauer, the ethical treatment of animals was not only of ethical importance but important to the creation of good character. [10]

Criticism of Christianity's view on animals

According to Schopenhauer, the traditional Christian view on the rights of animals is eschewed, as it presupposes that man has a righteous superiority in comparison to non-human animals, being allowed to use them as they so wish. [11] Schopenhauer says the fact that Christian morality handles animals as mere "things", that is, as a means, constitutes an immoral aspect of Christian philosophy. Schopenhauer would say that not recognizing the existence of the Will contained in animals is a faulty aspect of Christian thought. [12] For Schopenhauer, the Christian idea that man has an absolute right to authority over all other animals should be considered an error.

Schopenhauer's poodle

Arthur Schopenhauer with his poodle by Willhelm Butsch Arthur Schopenhauer by Wilhelm Busch.jpeg
Arthur Schopenhauer with his poodle by Willhelm Butsch

It was said that, during his later life, Arthur Schopenhauer preferred to live in solitude, with the exception of his pet dogs, all of which were purportedly poodles. It was said that his company of animals had been an influential factor in the development of his view on animal rights. [13] [14] All of his dogs were supposedly named "Atman", as in reflecting the sanskrit word for "true self", used in reference to the concept of the Atman from Hindu philosophy. It was said that Schopenhauer, naturally having a misanthropic aversion to people, would rather spend his time with walks with his poodle. He gained some notoriety as a mostly lonesome man who kept only the company of his dogs during old age, taking walks with them often, having once written: "whoever has never kept dogs does not know what it is to love and be loved". [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Schopenhauer</span> German pessimist philosopher (1788–1860)

Arthur Schopenhauer was a German philosopher. He is best known for his 1818 work The World as Will and Representation, which characterizes the phenomenal world as the product of a blind noumenal will. Building on the transcendental idealism of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), Schopenhauer developed an atheistic metaphysical and ethical system that rejected the contemporaneous ideas of German idealism. He was among the first thinkers in Western philosophy to share and affirm significant tenets of Indian philosophy, such as asceticism, denial of the self, and the notion of the world-as-appearance. His work has been described as an exemplary manifestation of philosophical pessimism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meaning of life</span> Philosophical and spiritual question concerning the significance of living or existence in general

The meaning of life, or the answer to the question: "What is the meaning of life?", pertains to the significance of living or existence in general. Many other related questions include: "Why are we here?", "What is life all about?", or "What is the purpose of existence?" There have been many proposed answers to these questions from many different cultural and ideological backgrounds. The search for life's meaning has produced much philosophical, scientific, theological, and metaphysical speculation throughout history. Different people and cultures believe different things for the answer to this question.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Five precepts</span> Basic code of ethics for Buddhist lay people

The five precepts or five rules of training is the most important system of morality for Buddhist lay people. They constitute the basic code of ethics to be respected by lay followers of Buddhism. The precepts are commitments to abstain from killing living beings, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying and intoxication. Within the Buddhist doctrine, they are meant to develop mind and character to make progress on the path to enlightenment. They are sometimes referred to as the Śrāvakayāna precepts in the Mahāyāna tradition, contrasting them with the bodhisattva precepts. The five precepts form the basis of several parts of Buddhist doctrine, both lay and monastic. With regard to their fundamental role in Buddhist ethics, they have been compared with the ten commandments in Abrahamic religions or the ethical codes of Confucianism. The precepts have been connected with utilitarianist, deontological and virtue approaches to ethics, though by 2017, such categorization by western terminology had mostly been abandoned by scholars. The precepts have been compared with human rights because of their universal nature, and some scholars argue they can complement the concept of human rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Speciesism</span> Special consideration to individuals solely on the basis of their species membership

Speciesism is a term used in philosophy regarding the treatment of individuals of different species. The term has several different definitions within the relevant literature. A common element of most definitions is that speciesism involves treating members of one species as morally more important than members of other species in the context of their similar interests. Some sources specifically define speciesism as discrimination or unjustified treatment based on an individual's species membership, while other sources define it as differential treatment without regard to whether the treatment is justified or not. Richard Ryder, who coined the term, defined it as "a prejudice or attitude of bias in favour of the interests of members of one's own species and against those of members of other species." Speciesism results in the belief that humans have the right to use non-human animals, which scholars say is pervasive in the modern society. Studies increasingly suggest that people who support animal exploitation also tend to endorse racist, sexist, and other prejudicial views, which furthers the beliefs in human supremacy and group dominance to justify systems of inequality and oppression.

Ātman is a Sanskrit word that refers to the (universal) Self or self-existent essence of individuals, as distinct from ego (Ahamkara), mind (Citta) and embodied existence (Prakṛti). The term is often translated as soul, but is better translated as "Self," as it solely refers to pure consciousness or witness-consciousness, beyond identification with phenomena. In order to attain moksha (liberation), a human being must acquire self-knowledge.

This Index of ethics articles puts articles relevant to well-known ethical debates and decisions in one place - including practical problems long known in philosophy, and the more abstract subjects in law, politics, and some professions and sciences. It lists also those core concepts essential to understanding ethics as applied in various religions, some movements derived from religions, and religions discussed as if they were a theory of ethics making no special claim to divine status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indian philosophy</span> Philosophical traditions of the Indian subcontinent

Indian philosophy refers to philosophical traditions of the Indian subcontinent. A traditional Hindu classification divides āstika and nāstika schools of philosophy, depending on one of three alternate criteria: whether it believes the Vedas as a valid source of knowledge; whether the school believes in the premises of Brahman and Atman; and whether the school believes in afterlife and Devas.

Ethics involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior. A central aspect of ethics is "the good life", the life worth living or life that is simply satisfying, which is held by many philosophers to be more important than traditional moral conduct.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vegetarianism and religion</span> Religious practices involving not eating meat

The practice of vegetarianism is strongly linked with a number of religious traditions worldwide. These include religions that originated in India, such as Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. With close to 85% of India's billion-plus population practicing these religions, India remains the country with the highest number of vegetarians in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buddhist vegetarianism</span> Vegetarianism in Buddhist culture and philosophy

Buddhist vegetarianism is the practice of vegetarianism by significant portions of Mahayana Buddhist monks and nuns and some Buddhists of other sects. In Buddhism, the views on vegetarianism vary between different schools of thought. The Mahayana schools generally recommend a vegetarian diet because they claimed Gautama Buddha set forth in some of the sutras that his followers must not eat the flesh of any sentient being.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buddhist ethics</span> Ethics in Buddhism

Buddhist ethics are traditionally based on what Buddhists view as the enlightened perspective of the Buddha. The term for ethics or morality used in Buddhism is Śīla or sīla (Pāli). Śīla in Buddhism is one of three sections of the Noble Eightfold Path, and is a code of conduct that embraces a commitment to harmony and self-restraint with the principal motivation being nonviolence, or freedom from causing harm. It has been variously described as virtue, moral discipline and precept.

On the Basis of Morality is one of Arthur Schopenhauer's major works in ethics, in which he argues that morality stems from compassion. Schopenhauer begins with a criticism of Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, which Schopenhauer considered to be the clearest explanation of Kant's foundation of ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kantian ethics</span> Ethical theory of Immanuel Kant

Kantian ethics refers to a deontological ethical theory developed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant that is based on the notion that: "It is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be considered good without limitation except a good will." The theory was developed in the context of Enlightenment rationalism. It states that an action can only be moral if (i) it is motivated by a sense of duty and (ii) its maxim may be rationally willed a universal, objective law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of humanism</span> Overview of and topical guide to humanism

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to humanism:

Higher consciousness is the consciousness of God or, in the words of Dawn DeVries, "the part of the human mind that is capable of transcending animal instincts". While the concept has ancient roots, it was significantly developed in German idealism, and is a central notion in contemporary popular spirituality, including the New Age movement.

Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong conduct. The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concern matters of value, and thus comprise the branch of philosophy called axiology.

The concept of moral rights for animals is believed to date as far back as Ancient India, particularly early Jainist and Hindu history. What follows is mainly the history of animal rights in the Western world. There is a rich history of animal protection in the ancient texts, lives, and stories of Eastern, African, and Indigenous peoples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buddhism and Western philosophy</span>

Buddhist thought and Western philosophy include several parallels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christianity and animal rights</span> Animal rights in Christianity

The relationship between Christianity and animal rights is complex, with different Christian communities coming to different conclusions about the status of animals. The topic is closely related to, but broader than, the practices of Christian vegetarians and the various Christian environmentalist movements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal rights in Indian religions</span>

The respect for animal rights in Jainism, Hinduism, and Buddhism derives from the doctrine of ahimsa.

References

  1. Schopenhauer, Arthur. "History of Vegetarianism". The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality..
  2. "Arthur Schopenhauer" (Great Philosophers ed.).
  3. Puryear, Stephen. "Schopenhauer on the rights of animals".
  4. Abelsen, Peter (1993). "Schopenhauer and Buddhism". Philosophy East and West. JStor. 43 (2): 255–278. doi:10.2307/1399616. JSTOR   1399616.
  5. Schopenhauer, Arthur. "History of Vegetarianism"..
  6. "Buddhism and Animals". BBC.
  7. "Arthur Schopenhauer: The first European Buddhist".
  8. "Schopenhauer and Buddhism". Schopenhauer was, I believe, the first European Buddhist (the first translations of the Hindu and Buddhist texts began to appear as he was writing the main work.
  9. "On the Will in Nature". Accordingly, the animal has all the emotions of humans, such as joy, grief, fear, anger, love, hatred, strong desire, envy, and so on. The great difference between human and animal rests solely on the intellect's degrees of perfection.
  10. Schopenhauer, Arthur. "A Critique of Kant". Since compassion for animals is so intimately associated with goodness of character, it may be confidently asserted that whoever is cruel to animals cannot be a good man.
  11. "Bible; Genesis 1:26–28". Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth."
  12. Schopenhauer, Arthur. "History of Vegetarianism". Thus, because Christian morality leaves animals out of account ..., they are at once outlawed in philosophical morals; they are mere "things", mere means to any ends whatsoever. They can therefore be used for vivisection, hunting, coursing, bullfights and horse racing, and can be whipped to death as they struggle along with heavy carts of stone. Shame on such a morality that is worthy of pariahs, chandalas and mlechchhas, and that fails to recognize the eternal essence that exists in every living thing, and shines forth with inscrutable significance from all eyes that see the sun!
  13. "What Poodle Owner said, "Just Remember, Once You're over the Hill you begin to Pick up Speed?"".
  14. "The philosopher of love who lived and died alone (with the exception of his poodles)".
  15. "The Pleasures of Poodles to a Pessimist". whoever has never kept dogs does not know what it is to love and be loved".

Further reading