Bactrocera tryoni

Last updated

Bactrocera tryoni
Queensland Fruit Fly - Bactrocera tryoni.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Diptera
Family: Tephritidae
Genus: Bactrocera
Species:
B. tryoni
Binomial name
Bactrocera tryoni
(Froggatt, 1897)
Synonyms
  • Tephritis tryoni
  • Chaetodacus tryoni var. sarcocephali
  • Chaetodacus tryoni var. juglandis

Bactrocera tryoni, the Queensland fruit fly, is a species of fly in the family Tephritidae in the insect order Diptera. B. tryoni is native to subtropical coastal Queensland and northern New South Wales. [1] They are active during the day, but mate at night. B. tryoni lay their eggs in fruit. The larvae then hatch and proceed to consume the fruit, causing the fruit to decay and drop prematurely. B. tryoni are responsible for an estimated $28.5 million a year in damage to Australian crops and are the most costly horticultural pest in Australia. Up to 100% of exposed fruit can be destroyed due to an infestation of this fly species. Previously, pesticides were used to eliminate B. tryoni from damaging crops. However, these chemicals are now banned. Thus, experts devoted to B. tryoni control have transitioned to studying this pests' behaviors to determine a new method of elimination.

Contents

Identification

Adult B. tryoni flies are reddish brown in color, have distinct yellow markings and are typically 5–8 mm in length. [2] Adults hold their wings horizontally when walking and flick them in a specific, characteristic manner. The wingspan of B. tryoni ranges from 4.8 to 6.3 mm. B. tryoni may be mistaken for wasps as they appear wasp-like.

Complex and sister species

They are part of a species complex, or a group of morphologically similar but biologically distinct species. [2] These are called sibling species. B. tryoni has three sibling species: B. neohumeralis, B. aquilonis, and B. melas. [2] All of these flies are sympatric, meaning that they inhabit the same territory, except B. aquilonas, which inhabits a different geographical area in northwest Australia. [3] Genetic data has suggested that B. aquilonas is simply an allopatric population of B. tryoni. [4] Additionally, B. tryoni mate at night, while B. neohumeralis mate during the day. [5] More pertinently, B. neohumeralis are not pests; they do not destroy crops. [2] Despite this behavioral difference, B. neohumeralis and B. tryoni are nearly genetically identical: the two species are only differentiable based on newly developed microsatellite technology. [6] The evolutionary relationship between the species within the B. tryoni complex is unknown. [2]

Distribution and habitat

B. tryoni prefer humid and warm climates. [4] Thus, they are most widespread in eastern Australia, as well as New Caledonia, French Polynesia, the Pitcairn Islands, and the Cook Islands. [2] Commercial fruit production has increased in Australia, increasing the geographical area in which B. tryoni can reside, extending as far inland as central Queensland and New South Wales. [7] Occasionally, there are outbreaks of B. tryoni in southern and western Australia; however, the coastal areas of Australia are relatively isolated from one another due to harsh, dry weather conditions in intervening regions that are unsuitable for B. tryoni. [8] Therefore, other regions of Australia typically remain free of this pest as long as infested fruit is not transported between regions. [9]

Life cycle

Egg

After passing through a two-week pre-oviposition stage following emergence from the pupae, adult females deposit around seven eggs in a fruit puncture, and may deposit up to 100 eggs per day. Fruit punctures are holes in the skin of the fruit that allow the females to access the nutrient-rich interior. Females often oviposit in punctures made by other fruit flies, such as the Mediterranean fruit fly ( Ceratitis capitata ), which results in many eggs occurring in a single cavity. [10] Additionally, B. tryoni females can create their own puncture to oviposit in the fruit, called a "sting".

Maggot (larva)

Eggs hatch into white larvae in 2–4 days under favorable weather conditions. These larvae, or maggots, eat toward the center of the fruit with their cutting jaws, causing it to rot. The maggots may reach up to 9 mm in length; larval development is completed in 10-31 days. At this point, the fruit has likely fallen to the ground. Up to 40 larvae can be reared from a single piece of fruit.

Pupal

The maggot chews its way out of the remaining fruit and enters the soil, where it enters the pupal stage of development. Pupal development requires various temperature ranges from one week in warmer weather to one month in cooler conditions. The flexible amount of time needed for pupal development has resulted in B. tryoni relative adaptiveness to different environments.

Adult

After the pupal stage is complete, adults emerge from the soil. This typically occurs near the end of the summer season. Unlike other fly pests, B. tryoni does not breed continuously, but spends the winter in the adult stage. [11] Adult females live many months, and up to four or five overlapping generations may occur annually. Adults may live for a year or longer.

Behavior

Host selection

B. tryoni have been found to infect almost all commercial fruit crops as hosts, including abiu, apple, avocado, babaco, capsicum, carambola, casimiroa, cherry, citrus, custard apple, granadilla, grape, guava, kiwifruit, mango, nectarine, papaya, passionfruit, peach, pear, persimmon, plum, pomegranate, prune, quince, loquat, santol, sapodilla, tamarillo, tomato, and wax jambu, with the exception of pineapples. [12] B. tryoni strongly prefer to oviposit into rotting fruit, although some evidence suggests that they will oviposit into under-ripe fruit as well. B. tryoni prefer to select fruits that have an outer layer that is able to be punctured or has already been lesioned. [12] The majority of research on B. tryoni host selection has included just a few, economically important crops. [2]

Adult feeding behavior

Larvae feed only on the flesh of fruit until they mature into adulthood. Adult flies, however, rely on leaf surface bacteria as a major source of protein. [2] There is some evidence suggesting that the bacteria and flies co-evolved, [13] but other data suggest that this symbiosis does not occur as the presence of protein-providing bacteria is not consistent throughout B. tryoni populations. [14] Due to this dependence on protein originating from bacteria, it is possible to control the population by providing flies with artificial protein mixed with insecticide. [2]

Mating behavior

B. tryoni flies mate at dusk. This is pertinent to control efforts because it is one of the few characteristics that distinguish it from sister species, B. neohumeralis, which are not a highly destructive species, even though the two are very closely related genetically and evolutionarily. [2]

Cue-lure in males

B. tryoni males exhibit behavior termed cue-lure, meaning that they are strongly attracted to a specific scent. [2] While this scent is artificially made, it is closely related to compounds occurring in nature. Male B. tryoni respond most greatly to the lure in the morning, likely because this is their peak of foraging time; however, an evolutionary reason for the cue-lure is not fully known. Cue-lure is only exhibited in sexually mature males, indicating that mate finding is related to the cue-lure behavior. [2] However, other Bactrocera species have been identified as means of enhancing male competitiveness, or to afford protection from predation. [15]

Ovipositional behavior

B. tryoni lay their eggs in fruit. Females prefer to lay their eggs in fruit that is sweet, juicy, and not acidic. [11] The presence of other female flies in pre- or post- oviposition on a piece of fruit was found to have no bearing on another female's likeliness to land on the fruit; however, female flies were more likely to bore into a piece of fruit that other female flies were currently ovipositing into, therefore increasing the density of larvae within a single piece of fruit. [11] This is an example of reciprocal altruism as larvae are at an advantage at higher densities.

Movement and dispersal

B. tryoni have evolved to disperse widely, which was greatly influenced their ability to cause damage to farms. [16] When fruit is available, the flies often do not disperse far distances (only a few hundred meters to a kilometer), but they have been found to travel large distances in the absence of fruit. In addition to lack of resources, adult flies may also move to locate overwintering sites or avoid dry or cold weather. [16]

Genomic studies

The genome of B. tryoni has been sequenced and published by a group at the University of New South Wales, Australia. While the coding regions are mostly completely sequenced, about one-third of the genome appears to consist of highly repetitive sequences.

Control efforts

B. tryoni has been the subject of extensive control regimens. One of these regimens is a Fruit Fly Exclusion Zone (FFEZ), where transporting fruit into certain regions of Australia and Polynesia is illegal. In May 2012, January 2013, February 2015, and February 2019, the fly was found in Auckland, posing a risk to horticulture and leading to a quarantine (see Biosecurity in New Zealand). [9]

Lure-and-kill tactics

Farmers in effected regions are encouraged to use a lure and kill tactic to combat the presence of B. tryoni. [17] Lure and kill tactics include the use of some sort of bait that attracts the pest, or a lure. [18] This can include semiochemical lures such as pheromones, food attractants, host mimics, or color attractants. [2] The killing mechanism often involves pesticides, liquid traps in which the pest drowns, or sticky traps that the pest cannot escape from. [2] At low densities of B. tryoni, lure and kill tactics are most effective as a mechanism to monitor the frequency of B. tryoni; at high densities, they effectively combat the pest via population reduction. [17] Two of the most common lure and kill approaches for B. tryoni are the male annihilation technique (MAT) and the protein-bait spray (PBS). [2]

Protein-bait spray

Both male and female B. tryoni require proteins produced by bacteria found on the leaves of plants in order to reach sexual maturity. [2] The protein-bait spray takes advantage of this behavior by combining necessary proteins normally acquired from leaf bacteria with deadly insecticides. [19] The combination of protein and insecticide attracts B. tryoni of both sexes, resulting in elimination of adult flies. [20] Neither the effectiveness of this technique, nor the scientific underpinnings of what protein exactly attracts B. tryoni to the spray, are well investigated. [2]

Male annihilation technique

B. tryoni sexually mature males are strongly responsive to specific scents that may be associated with mating, or a cue-lure. [21] A specific cue-lure, Willson's lure, was found to be incredibly effective at attracting sexually mature B. tryoni males. [22] When combined with insecticides, artificially developed cue lures may be an effective elimination method of sexually mature males. While extensive research has suggested this is an effective strategy in other fly species, very few controlled experiments have been conducted to determine the effectiveness of the male annihilation technique in B. tryoni. [2]

Pesticides

Control efforts include submerging post-harvest fruit and treating fields of fruit trees with the chemicals dimethoate and fenthion. As of October 2011, the use of these chemicals was under review by the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority. As a result, dimethoate was suspended from use. [23] As of 2014, fenthion was no longer commercially available in Australia.

Sterile insect technique (SIT)

Containment efforts have included irradiating pupae in order to induce sterility. A study testing the viability of this technique found that sterility was dose independent, meaning that a single ionizing event was enough to render the male sperm sterile. [24] Additionally, it was found that emergence and flight ability remained unaffected by the ionizing event. This indicates that males sterilized via a low dosage of radiation were equally as competitive as males that were not irradiated. [24]

The white locus

A popular method for controlling populations of invasive or destructive species of flies involves producing a strain of fly that is incapable of reproducing. [25] If this can be accomplished, this strain can be mass-produced and released into the wild without necessitating repeated exposure to irradiation as required in methods such as the sterile insect technique (SIT). [24] If they have the same sexual competitiveness as wild type males, then the species' overall population will presumably decrease. In order to accomplish developing such a strain in B. tryoni, molecular tools capable of genetically transforming B. tryoni must be implemented. [25] One such strain of a genetically compatible fly has been developed in Drosophila melanogaster. [25] The phenotypic marker for the presence of an efficient vector for gene transfer is white eye color. [25] Development of a genetically engineered B. tryoni strain that is compatible with gene transfer was successful; however, scientists have yet to develop a sterile strain that can be released into the wild. [25]

Climate change

While this species is native to northeastern Australia, rising temperatures due to climate change has allowed the species to spread to other regions of Australia and Polynesia. B. tryoni are able to tolerate extremely high temperatures but have a minimum necessary temperature to breed; therefore, global warming has fostered their spread across Australia and Polynesia. [2] Although B. tryoni have a minimum temperature requirement for survival, extreme plasticity and adaptation has been observed in adult B. tryoni. [19] This adaptation has allowed them to survive in cooler temperatures and at higher altitudes. [19] This behavior, combined with global warming, indicates that damage due to these insects will continue to increase as the temperatures continue to rise. One study predicted that farm damage due to Queensland fruit flies will increase by $3.1, $4.7, and $12.0 million with temperature increases of 0.5, 1 and 2 °C, respectively. [26]

Simulations of climate change

Rising CO2 levels may influence the distribution of B. tryoni [27] . Based upon recent studies which utilize computer programs to simulate B. tryoni distribution in the event of rising temperatures, it was predicted that there will be an overall increase in Queensland fruit fly damage, but the fruit flies will re-localize to more southerly locations as northern and central Queensland will begin to exceed the maximum habitable temperature of B. tryoni. [27] However, these simulations may not accurately predict the future distributions of B. tryoni as they have exhibited an immense capability to adapt to various conditions. [19] The prediction is also complicated by the uncertainty of how the relative humidity will change in regions across Australia as temperature increases, and B. tryoni survival is heavily dependent upon a humid climate. [19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sterile insect technique</span> Method of biological control for insect populations

The sterile insect technique (SIT) is a method of biological insect control, whereby overwhelming numbers of sterile insects are released into the wild. The released insects are preferably male, as this is more cost-effective and the females may in some situations cause damage by laying eggs in the crop, or, in the case of mosquitoes, taking blood from humans. The sterile males compete with fertile males to mate with the females. Females that mate with a sterile male produce no offspring, thus reducing the next generation's population. Sterile insects are not self-replicating and, therefore, cannot become established in the environment. Repeated release of sterile males over low population densities can further reduce and in cases of isolation eliminate pest populations, although cost-effective control with dense target populations is subjected to population suppression prior to the release of the sterile males.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tephritidae</span> Family of fruit flies

The Tephritidae are one of two fly families referred to as fruit flies, the other family being the Drosophilidae. The family Tephritidae does not include the biological model organisms of the genus Drosophila, which is often called the "common fruit fly". Nearly 5,000 described species of tephritid fruit fly are categorized in almost 500 genera of the Tephritidae. Description, recategorization, and genetic analyses are constantly changing the taxonomy of this family. To distinguish them from the Drosophilidae, the Tephritidae are sometimes called peacock flies, in reference to their elaborate and colorful markings. The name comes from the Greek τεφρος, tephros, meaning "ash grey". They are found in all the biogeographic realms.

A semiochemical, from the Greek σημεῖον (semeion), meaning "signal", is a chemical substance or mixture released by an organism that affects the behaviors of other individuals. Semiochemical communication can be divided into two broad classes: communication between individuals of the same species (intraspecific) or communication between different species (interspecific).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tephritoidea</span> Superfamily of flies

The Tephritoidea are a superfamily of flies. It has over 7,800 species, the majority of them in family Tephritidae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Olive fruit fly</span> Species of fly

The olive fruit fly is a species of fruit fly which belongs to the subfamily Dacinae. It is a phytophagous species whose larvae feed on the fruit of olive trees, hence the common name. It is considered a serious pest in the cultivation of olives.

<i>Ceratitis capitata</i> Species of insect

Ceratitis capitata, commonly known as the Mediterranean fruit fly or medfly, is a yellow-and-brown fly native to sub-Saharan Africa. It has no near relatives in the Western Hemisphere and is considered to be one of the most destructive fruit pests in the world. There have been occasional medfly infestations in California, Florida, and Texas that require extensive eradication efforts to prevent the fly from establishing itself in the United States.

<i>Bactrocera</i> Genus of flies

Bactrocera is a large genus of tephritid fruit flies, with close to 500 species currently described and accepted.

<i>Bactrocera dorsalis</i> Species of insect

Bactrocera dorsalis, previously known as Dacus dorsalis and commonly referred to as the oriental fruit fly, is a species of tephritid fruit fly that is endemic to Southeast Asia. It is one of the major pest species in the genus Bactrocera with a broad host range of cultivated and wild fruits. Male B. dorsalis respond strongly to methyl eugenol, which is used to monitor and estimate populations, as well as to annihilate males as a form of pest control. They are also important pollinators and visitors of wild orchids, Bulbophyllum cheiri and Bulbophyllum vinaceum in Southeast Asia, which lure the flies using methyl eugenol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tephritid Workers Database</span>

The Tephritid Workers Database is a web-based database for sharing information on tephritid fruit flies. Because these species are one of the most economically important group of insect species that threaten fruit and vegetable production and trade worldwide, a tremendous amount of information is made available each year: new technologies developed, new information on their biology and ecology; new control methods made available, new species identified, new outbreaks recorded and new operational control programmes launched. The TWD allows workers to keep up-to-date on the most recent developments and provides an easily accessible and always available resource.

<i>Bactrocera cucurbitae</i> Species of fly

Bactrocera cucurbitae, the melon fly, is a fruit fly of the family Tephritidae. It is a serious agricultural pest, particularly in Hawaii.

<i>Anastrepha</i> Genus of flies

Anastrepha is the most diverse genus in the American tropics and subtropics. Currently, it comprises more than 300 described species, including nine major pest species, such as the Mexican fruit fly, the South American fruit fly, the West Indian fruit fly, the sapote fruit fly, the Caribbean fruit fly, the American guava fruit fly, and the pumpkin fruit fly, as well as the papaya fruit fly. As some of their names suggest, these pest species are one of the most numerous and damaging groups of insects in their native range, plaguing commercial fruits such as citrus, mango, guava, and papaya.

<i>Anastrepha ludens</i> Species of fly

Anastrepha ludens, the Mexican fruit fly or Mexfly, is a species of fly of the Anastrepha genus in the Tephritidae family. It is closely related to the Caribbean fruit fly Anastrepha suspensa, and the papaya fruit fly Anastrepha curvicauda.

<i>Bactrocera invadens</i> Species of fly

Bactrocera (Bactrocera) invadens is the name given to tephritid fruit flies that were introduced to East Africa from Sri Lanka and subsequently invaded practically the whole of Sub-Saharan Africa, hence the species name "invadens". It was first shown to be the same biological species as B. dorsalis s.s. by possessing identical sex pheromonal components after consumption of methyl eugenol, and also based on CO1 and rDNA sequences. Subsequently, it was agreed that B. invadens, B. papayae and B. philippinensis be synonymized as B. dorsalis. To counteract its detrimental effects to the fruit business, the industry resorts to cold treatment in order to get rid of the larvae.

<i>Anastrepha suspensa</i> Species of fly

Anastrepha suspensa, known as the Caribbean fruit fly, the Greater Antillean fruit fly, guava fruit fly, or the Caribfly, is a species of tephritid fruit fly. As the names suggest, these flies feed on and develop in a variety of fruits, primarily in the Caribbean. They mainly infest mature to overripe fruits. While thought to have originated in Cuba, the Caribbean fruit fly can now also be found in Florida, Hispaniola, and Puerto Rico.

An attractant is any chemical that attracts an organism, e.g. i) synthetic lures; ii) aggregation and sex pheromones ; and iii) synomone

<i>Bactrocera carambolae</i> Species of fly

Bactrocera carambolae, also known as the carambola fruit fly, is a fruit fly species in the family Tephritidae, and is native to Asia. This species was described by Drew and Hancock in 1994.

Ronald John Prokopy was an American entomologist who was a specialist on the behavior and biology of Rhagoletis flies and approaches to their management in apple orchards.

Bactrocera passiflorae, the Fijian fruit fly, is a species of fly in the family Tephritidae in the insect order Diptera. It is native to several tropical and subtropical islands in the Pacific Ocean and is a pest of fruit crops.

<i>Anastrepha fraterculus</i> South American fruit fly

Anastrepha fraterculus, known as the South American fruit fly, is a fruit fly species from the genus Anastrepha. A. fraterculus is a polyphagous, frugivorous fly that is a significant pest of commercial fruit production in South America.

References

  1. ↑ Yu, H.; Frommer, M.; Robson, M. K.; Meats, A. W.; Shearman, D. C.; Sved, J. A. (April 2001). "Microsatellite analysis of the Queensland fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae) indicates spatial structuring: implications for population control". Bulletin of Entomological Research. 91 (2): 139–147. ISSN   0007-4853. PMID   11260729.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Clarke, A. R.; Powell, K. S.; Weldon, C. W.; Taylor, P. W. (2011). "The ecology of Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae): what do we know to assist pest management?" (PDF). Annals of Applied Biology. 158 (1): 26–54. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00448.x. hdl: 10019.1/122744 . ISSN   1744-7348.
  3. ↑ Fletcher, B. S. (December 1978). "Economic Fruit Flies of the South Pacific Region: R. A. I. Drew, G. H. S. Hooper and M. A. Bateman. Department of Primary Industries, Qld 4068 and Department of Health, Canberra, A.C.T. 1978. Pp. 137. Distributed free". Australian Journal of Entomology. 17 (4): 384. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1978.tb01512.x . ISSN   1326-6756.
  4. 1 2 Cameron, Emilie. (2006). Fruit fly pests of northwestern Australia. OCLC   311470637.
  5. ↑ Lewontin, R. C.; Birch, L. C. (September 1966). "Hybridization as a Source of Variation for Adaptation to New Environments". Evolution. 20 (3): 315–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1966.tb03369.x . ISSN   0014-3820. PMID   28562982.
  6. ↑ Gilchrist, A Stuart; Ling, Alison E (May 2006). "DNA microsatellite analysis of naturally occurring colour intermediates between Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) and Bactrocera neohumeralis (Hardy) (Diptera: Tephritidae)". Australian Journal of Entomology. 45 (2): 157–162. doi:10.1111/j.1440-6055.2006.00522.x. ISSN   1326-6756.
  7. ↑ OSBORNE, R.; MEATS, A.; FROMMER, M.; SVED, J. A.; DREW, R. A. I.; ROBSON, M. K. (February 1997). "Australian Distribution of 17 Species of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Caught in Cue Lure Traps in February 1994". Australian Journal of Entomology. 36 (1): 45–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1997.tb01430.x . ISSN   1326-6756.
  8. ↑ Sutherst, Robert W.; Yonow, Tania (1998). "The geographical distribution of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) tryoni, in relation to climate". Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 49 (6): 935. doi:10.1071/a97152. ISSN   0004-9409.
  9. 1 2 Chapman, Kate; Robinson, Victoria (11 May 2012). "Fly breach blamed on relaxed security". stuff.co.nz. Fairfax Media. Retrieved 13 May 2012.
  10. ↑ Gomulski, L. M., Pitts, R. J., Costa, S., Saccone, G., Torti, C., Polito, L. C., Gasperi, G., Malacrida, A. R., Kafatos, F. C., Zwiebel, L. J. Genomic Organization and Characterization of the white Locus of the Mediterranean Fruitfly, Ceratitis capitata Genetics 2001 157: 1245-1255 Full text
  11. 1 2 3 Prokopy, Ronald J.; Romig, Meredith C.; Drew, Richard A. I. (1999-11-01). "Facilitation in Ovipositional Behavior of Bactrocera tryoni Flies". Journal of Insect Behavior. 12 (6): 815–832. doi:10.1023/A:1020909227680. ISSN   1572-8889. S2CID   30951735.
  12. 1 2 Eisemann, C. H.; Rice, M. J. (1985). "Oviposition behaviour of Dacus tryoni: The effects of some sugars and salts". Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 39 (1): 61–71. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1985.tb03543.x. ISSN   1570-7458. S2CID   84954164.
  13. ↑ Lloyd, AC; Drew, RAI; Teakle, DS; Hayward, AC (1986). "Bacteria Associated with some Dacus Species (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their Host Fruit in Queensland". Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 39 (4): 361. doi: 10.1071/bi9860361 . ISSN   0004-9417.
  14. ↑ Fitt, Gary P.; O'Brien, R. W. (October 1985). "Bacteria associated with four species of Dacus (Diptera: Tephritidae) and their role in the nutrition of the larvae". Oecologia. 67 (3): 447–454. Bibcode:1985Oecol..67..447F. doi:10.1007/BF00384954. ISSN   0029-8549. PMID   28311582. S2CID   23047254.
  15. ↑ Raghu, S. (October 2004). "Functional significance of phytochemical lures to dacine fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): an ecological and evolutionary synthesis". Bulletin of Entomological Research. 94 (5): 385–399. doi:10.1079/ber2004313. ISSN   0007-4853. PMID   15385058. S2CID   30709690.
  16. 1 2 Pritchard, G (1969). "The ecology of a natural population of Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni II. The distribution of eggs and its relation to behaviour". Australian Journal of Zoology. 17 (2): 293. doi:10.1071/zo9690293. ISSN   0004-959X.
  17. 1 2 De Souza, K. R.; McVeigh, L. J.; Wright, D. J. (1992-12-01). "Selection of Insecticides for Lure and Kill Studies Against Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)". Journal of Economic Entomology. 85 (6): 2100–2106. doi:10.1093/jee/85.6.2100. ISSN   1938-291X.
  18. ↑ El-Sayed, A. M.; Suckling, D. M.; Byers, J. A.; Jang, E. B.; Wearing, C. H. (2009-06-01). "Potential of "Lure and Kill" in Long-Term Pest Management and Eradication of Invasive Species". Journal of Economic Entomology. 102 (3): 815–835. doi:10.1603/029.102.0301. ISSN   0022-0493. PMID   19610395. S2CID   16623066.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 Bateman, MA (1967). "Adaptations to temperature in geographic races of the Queensland fruit fly Dacus (Strumenta) tryoni". Australian Journal of Zoology. 15 (6): 1141. doi:10.1071/zo9671141. ISSN   0004-959X.
  20. ↑ McQuate, G. T. (July 2009). "Effectiveness of GF-120NF Fruit Fly Bait as a suppression tool forBactrocera latifrons(Diptera: Tephritidae)". Journal of Applied Entomology. 133 (6): 444–448. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01386.x. ISSN   0931-2048. S2CID   86565348.
  21. ↑ Metcalf, Robert L. (1990-11-01). "Chemical Ecology of Dacinae Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)". Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 83 (6): 1017–1030. doi:10.1093/aesa/83.6.1017. ISSN   0013-8746.
  22. ↑ Bateman, MA; Friend, AH; Hampshire, F (1966). "Population suppression in the Queensland fruit fly, Dacus (Strumeta) Tryoni. I. The effects of male depletion in a semi-isolated population". Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 17 (5): 687. doi:10.1071/ar9660687. ISSN   0004-9409.
  23. ↑ Chemical review: dimethoate Archived 2014-06-14 at the Wayback Machine on APVMA website
  24. 1 2 3 Collins, S. R.; Weldon, C. W.; Banos, C.; Taylor, P. W. (2008). "Effects of irradiation dose rate on quality and sterility of Queensland fruit flies, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt)". Journal of Applied Entomology. 132 (5): 398–405. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01284.x. ISSN   1439-0418. S2CID   85298741.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 Bennett, C. L.; Frommer, M. (November 1997). "The white gene of the tephritid fruit fly Bactrocera tryoni is characterized by a long untranslated 5′ leader and a 12 kb first intron". Insect Molecular Biology. 6 (4): 343–356. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2583.1997.00188.x. ISSN   0962-1075. PMID   9359576. S2CID   13421727.
  26. ↑ Sutherst, Robert W.; Collyer, Ben S.; Yonow, Tania (2000). "The vulnerability of Australian horticulture to the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera (Dacus) tryoni, under climate change". Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51 (4): 467. doi:10.1071/AR98203. ISSN   0004-9409.
  27. 1 2 Deutsch, Curtis A. Tewksbury, Joshua J. Huey, Raymond B. Sheldon, Kimberly S. Ghalambor, Cameron K. Haak, David C. Martin, Paul R. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. National Academy of Sciences. OCLC   678797953.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.