Catharina Margaretha Linck

Last updated
1720 drawing of Linck/Rosenstengel in both feminine and masculine clothing CatharinaMargarethaLinck crop.jpg
1720 drawing of Linck/Rosenstengel in both feminine and masculine clothing

Catharina Margaretha Linck (died 1721) was a Prussian woman who presented as a man for the majority of her adult life. Linck married a woman and, based on their sexual activity together, was convicted of sodomy and executed by order of King Frederick William I in 1721. Linck's execution was the last for lesbian sexual activity in Europe and an anomaly for its time.

Contents

This article is only based on Brigitte Ericsson's translation of Franz Carl Müller's publication (1891) of some parts of Linck's courtfiles.

Background

The only source of information available in English about Linck is a court document dated 13 October 1721. It summarizes the testimony taken at the trial of Linck and Linck’s wife, and reviews possible punishments for consideration by the monarch. [1] Scholars of the period characterize her as a lesbian [2] [3] [4] and place Linck in a social context in which women adopted male attire for a variety of reasons, including "to involve themselves sexually with another woman, either with or without the other woman's knowledge". [5]

Life

Linck was born the illegitimate child of a widow, and grew up in an orphanage in Halle. According to Linck’s mother's testimony, after leaving the orphanage at age 14, and learning to work in the cloth and button-making trades, Linck, "[i]n order to lead a life of chastity ... disguised herself in men's clothes" and then spent some years with an unorthodox religious group called the "Inspirants", likely a form of Quakers. Linck next served three years in the Hanoverian Army until she deserted in 1708. When she was apprehended, Linck escaped hanging "when she disclosed her sex", submitting to an examination by someone identified as Professor Francken. Linck then served in the armed forces of Prussia until a letter from Francken revealed that Linck was a woman. Dismissed from military service, Linck returned to Halle and lived for a summer as a woman. She then joined a Polish garrison and, next, the forces of Hesse, using several more male aliases and deserting from the service both times. Linck returned again to Halle and worked in the cloth trade for several years, sometimes supervising several women, "sometimes wearing female, sometimes male clothing". She was arrested, presumably for the earlier desertion, but was again released "because of Professor Francken and his disclosure of her femaleness", though only after a physical examination by authorities at the town hall. [6]

In 1717, having adopted men's clothing once more and begun representing herself as a man named Anastasius Lagrantius Rosenstengel, Linck met and married 18-year-old Catharina Margaretha Mühlhahn at Halberstadt. [7] The court records detail their sexual activities. Linck "had made a penis of stuffed leather ... and had tied it to her pubes with a leather strap. When she went to bed with her alleged [sic] wife she put this leather object into the other's body and in this way had actually accomplished intercourse." Linck claimed to have performed similar acts with women she hired while she was a soldier. Linck testified to experiencing great excitement during intercourse: "whenever she was at the height of her passion, she felt tingling in her veins, arms, and legs". [8] The marriage was unsettled, with Mühlhahn's mother at times trying to separate the couple. Linck earned money through begging, and sometimes relocating to seek charitable support, was baptized a Catholic and then received baptism as a Lutheran. The trial record says that in a final confrontation Mühlhahn's mother "charged the defendant with being a woman and not a man", "ripped open her pants, examined her, and ... found not the slightest sign of anything masculine". Mühlhahn's mother provided the authorities with the artificial penis, along with a "leather-covered horn" that Linck wore next to her body and that allowed her to urinate while standing up. [9]

In court, Linck and Mühlhahn disputed whether Mühlhahn fully understood how their intercourse was accomplished. Mühlhahn in her testimony detailed how Linck had "tortured and tormented her" in attempting intercourse. [10] She said that her questions about the way Linck urinated had been met with abusive comments and threats of violence. She described examining Linck's anatomy once in 1717 while she slept and discovering that "he was fashioned exactly like herself". This gave her an advantage over Linck, who begged her not to notify the authorities, and proposed that they live together as brother and sister. [11]

Linck admitted to sodomy on account of having been "deluded by Satan," but denied making Mühlhahn suffer. The marriage to Mühlhahn was the work of other forces, Linck claimed, since Satan had tracked her since birth. As for the additional charges, Linck claimed that the wearing of men's clothes was forbidden for married women but not for the unmarried; that she had suffered for the desertions and had "spent weeks in chains and fetters" while under arrest; and excused her multiple baptisms as motivated by new covenants with God. In sum: [12]

Whether Linck had committed an offense she did not know; she confessed and repented the sins; she deserved death tenfold; however, even if she were done away with, others like her would remain. Linck did not know what else to offer as an excuse; she had committed sins against God and was quite willing to die.

Finally, two medical witnesses reported that in examining Linck they had found "nothing hermaphroditic, much less masculine". [13]

The local court forwarded the records of its inquiry to the Judicial Faculty at Duisburg, which recommended that Linck be publicly hanged and that her body be burned. They recommended torture to extract further testimony from Mühlhahn. [13] The Halberstadt officials who were submitting this information for review by King Frederick William wrote at length about the difficulty of determining the appropriate punishment because the Bible was silent on sexual acts between women and the acts in question did not meet the formal definition of sodomy, since they were "committed with a lifeless leather device". [2] They also considered which method of execution was called for: beheading, hanging or burning. They recommended beheading by the sword, the body to be burned afterwards. Some members of the court who thought that the death penalty could not be imposed if Linck's behavior did not precisely match Biblical definitions of sodomy recommended flogging for the other offenses. [14] The report recognized that Mühlhahn had committed a lesser offense and described her as "this simple-minded person who let herself be seduced into depravity". For her the Halberstadt court recommended three years imprisonment followed by banishment, rather than the torture that the Duisburg court had recommended. [14] The king confirmed the sentences of death by beheading for Linck and imprisonment for Mühlhahn. [15]

In contemporary media

Linck's story was the subject of a play, Executed For Sodomy: The Life of Catharina Linck, performed at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in 2013. [16]

Linck's monologue appeared in Jack Shamblin's solo performance SODOMITE, A History Of Sodomy Laws, which was performed at P.S. 122, Dixon Place, The Red Room Theatre, Mother, and Jackie 60 during the mid- to late 1990s in New York City. It was a political performance against the then-existing U.S. sodomy laws. The monologue was reinterpreted in a video art piece by Fred Koenig for the launch of Jack Shamblin's book Queering The Stage at Hot Festival 2015 at Dixon Place in New York City. The text of the monologue is included in Shamblin's book.

A theatrical play by Ruby Thomas, Linck and Mülhahn, was premiered at the Hampstead Theatre in London at the beginning of 2023. According to the theatre's programme notes for the play:

Dashing soldier Anastasius Linck has no intention of falling in love, but a chance encounter with the rebellious Catharina Mülhahn changes everything. As they begin to forge a relationship that breaks boundaries and rejects the rigid rules of their society, they find themselves confronted by a world determined to tear them apart.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Buggery Act 1533</span> English legislation criminalizing sodomy

The Buggery Act 1533, formally An Acte for the punishment of the vice of Buggerie, was an Act of the Parliament of England that was passed during the reign of Henry VIII.

Molly house or molly-house was a term used in 18th- and 19th-century Britain for a meeting place for homosexual men and gender-nonconforming people. The meeting places were generally taverns, public houses, coffeehouses or even private rooms where men could either socialise or meet possible sexual partners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of LGBT history</span> Notable events in LGBT history

The following is the timeline of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) history.

Zināʾ (زِنَاء) or zinā is an Islamic legal term referring to unlawful sexual intercourse. According to traditional jurisprudence, zina can include adultery, fornication, prostitution, rape, sodomy, incest, and bestiality. Zina must be proved by testimony of four Muslim eyewitnesses to the actual act of penetration, or a confession repeated four times and not retracted later. The offenders must have acted of their own free will. Rapists could be prosecuted under different legal categories which used normal evidentiary rules. Making an accusation of zina without presenting the required eyewitnesses is called qadhf (القذف), which is itself a hudud offense.

The Aberdeen Scandal was a military sexual assault scandal in 1996 at Aberdeen Proving Ground, a United States Army base in Maryland.

<i>Martin v. Ziherl</i> 2005 Supreme Court of Virginia case

Martin v. Ziherl, 607 S.E.2d 367, was a decision by the Supreme Court of Virginia holding that the Virginia criminal law against fornication was unconstitutional. The court's decision followed the 2003 ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Lawrence v. Texas, which established the constitutionally-protected right of adults to engage in private, consensual sex.

Anne Stanley was an English noblewoman. She was the eldest daughter of the Earl of Derby and, through her two marriages, became Baroness Chandos and later Countess of Castlehaven. She was a distant relative of Elizabeth I of England and for some time was seen as a possible heiress to the English throne.

Rajm in Islam refers to the Hudud punishment wherein an organized group throws stones at a convicted individual until that person dies. Under some versions of Islamic law (Sharia), it is the prescribed punishment in cases of adultery committed by a married person which requires either a confession from either the adulterer or adulteress, or producing four witnesses of sexual penetration.

Catharina is a feminine given name, the Dutch and Swedish spelling of the name Catherine. In the Netherlands, people use a great number of short forms in daily life, including Carine, Catelijne, Cato, Ina, Ineke, Kaat, Kaatje, Karen, Karin, Katja, Katrien, Katrijn, Kitty, Nienke, Rina, Tineke, Tiny, Toos, Trijn, Trijntje, and many others. People with the name include:

Maouloud Baby v. State of Maryland is a Maryland state court case relating to the ability to withdraw sexual consent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wanda Jean Allen</span> American woman executed in 2001

Wanda Jean Allen was sentenced to death in 1989 for the murder of Gloria Jean Leathers, 29, her longtime girlfriend. Allen was the first black woman to be executed in the United States since 1954. She was the sixth woman to be executed since executions resumed in the United States of America in 1977. Her final appeals and the last three months of her life were chronicled by filmmaker Ivana Barrios in the documentary The Execution of Wanda Jean (2002).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sodomy</span> Anal or oral sex with people, any sex with an animal, non-procreative sex

Sodomy, also called buggery in British English, generally refers to either anal sex between people, or any sexual activity between a human and another animal (bestiality). It may also mean any non-procreative sexual activity. Originally, the term sodomy, which is derived from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in the Book of Genesis, was commonly restricted to homosexual anal sex. Sodomy laws in many countries criminalized the behavior. In the Western world, many of these laws have been overturned or are routinely not enforced. A person who practices sodomy is sometimes referred to as a sodomite, a pejorative term.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sodomy law</span> Laws criminalising certain sexual acts

A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law but are typically understood by courts to include any sexual act deemed to be "unnatural" or "immoral". Sodomy typically includes anal sex, oral sex, manual sex, and bestiality. In practice, sodomy laws have rarely been enforced against heterosexual couples, and have mostly been used to target homosexual couples.

This is a list of events in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Intersex (LGBTQ+) history in Germany.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karin Svensdotter</span> Character in Swedish folklore

Karin Svensdotter was a 17th-century Swedish woman who claimed to have had children with the King of the fairies.

In medieval Europe, attitudes toward homosexuality varied from region to region, determined by religious culture; the Catholic Church, which dominated the religious landscape, considered, and still considers, sodomy as a mortal sin and a "crime against nature". By the 11th century, "sodomy" was increasingly viewed as a serious moral crime and punishable by mutilation or death. Medieval records reflect this growing concern. The emergence of heretical groups, such as the Cathars and Waldensians, witnesses a rise in allegations of unnatural sexual conduct against such heretics as part of the war against heresy in Christendom. Accusations of sodomy and "unnatural acts" were levelled against the Order of the Knights Templar in 1307 as part of Philip IV of France's attempt to suppress the order. These allegations have been dismissed by some scholars.

Katherina Hetzeldorfer was recorded as the first woman to be executed for female homosexuality. She was drowned in the Rhine in Speyer.

Sven Andersson (1668–1691), was a Swedish farmhand from Vättle in Västergötland, who was executed for having sexual intercourse with a bergrå. The case is often quoted to illustrate the cases where humans were sentenced to death accused of having sexual relations with mythical creatures, and was likely the last one of such cases in Sweden. It also provides a good illustration of the phenomenon known as bergtagning, which is a well-attested belief in old Scandinavia.

Daniel Ken Holtzclaw is a former police officer in the United States. He was convicted in December 2015 of multiple counts of rape, sexual battery, and other sex offenses while working for the Oklahoma City Police Department.

Female sodomy is a general category of sexual or erotic activities enacted between women. It was codified as a legal category in medieval and early modern Europe, although it differed greatly between regions. Female sodomy is distinct from the social and legal category of (male) sodomy due to the significant differences in the way women accused of sodomy were seen in society and treated within the court system. A person who commits sodomy is sometimes referred to as a sodomite. Notable historical female sodomites include Katherina Hetzeldorfer and Benedetta Carlini.

References

  1. Eriksson, Brigitte (1981). "A Lesbian Execution in Germany, 1721: The Trial Records". Journal of Homosexuality. 6 (1): 27–40. doi:10.1300/J082v06n01_04. PMID   7042827 . Retrieved 1 August 2014. The trial records have been reprinted in Salvator J. Licata and Rebert P. Petersen, ed. (1982). The Gay Past: A Collection of Historical Essays. Routledge. pp. 27–40. ISBN   9781317959694 . Retrieved 1 August 2014.
  2. 1 2 Crompton, Louis (2006). Homosexuality & Civilization. Harvard University Press. pp. 473–475. ISBN   0-674-02233-5 . Retrieved 1 August 2014.
  3. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 28
  4. Matter, E. Ann (1986). "My Sister, My Spouse: Woman-Identified Women in Medieval Christianity". Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion. 2 (2): 91. JSTOR   25002043.
  5. Potter, Edward T. (2012). Marriage, Gender, and Desire in Early Enlightenment German Comedy. Camden House. pp. 90–91. ISBN   9781571135292 . Retrieved 1 August 2014.
  6. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 28-31
  7. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 31, 34
  8. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 31
  9. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 32-33
  10. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 34-35
  11. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 35
  12. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 33-34
  13. 1 2 Eriksson, "Trial Records", 37
  14. 1 2 Eriksson, "Trial Records", 37-40
  15. Eriksson, "Trial Records", 28. The report to the king does not indicate his response. Historians like Eriksson who state that he followed the Halberstadt court's advice follow the commentary of F.C. Müller, who first discovered the trial report in the Prussian Secret Archives, transcribed it, and published it in 1891.
  16. "LINCK the only woman ever executed for sodomy". Archived from the original on 25 June 2021. Retrieved 1 August 2014.

Further reading

  1. REDIRECT Angela Steidele

, In Männerkleidern. Das verwegene Leben der Catharina Margaretha Linck, hingerichtet 1721, Cologne: Böhlau, 2004., ISBN   3-412-16703-7.Revised and augmented edition, Berlin: Insel 2021, ISBN

  1. REDIRECT 978-3-458-17945-0