Chernobyl New Safe Confinement

Last updated

Chernobyl New Safe Confinement
Новий чорнобильський саркофаг
NSC-Oct-2017.jpg
The New Safe Confinement in its final position over the destroyed reactor 4 in October 2017
Ukraine under russian occupation grey.svg
Red pog.svg
Location of the NSC, near the abandoned city of Pripyat, Ukraine
Alternative namesNew Shelter
General information
StatusOperational
Type Containment structure
Location Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant
Town or city Pripyat
Country Ukraine
Coordinates 51°23′21″N30°05′36″E / 51.3893°N 30.0932°E / 51.3893; 30.0932
Construction startedSeptember 2010
CompletedNovember 2016 [1]
Cost€2.1 billion
Client Government of Ukraine
Height108 metres (354.3 ft) [2]
Dimensions
Weight31000 t [3]
Other dimensionsSpan 260 metres (853.0 ft), external length 165 metres (541.3 ft) [3]
Technical details
Structural systemArch-shaped lattice, clad with sandwich panels
MaterialSteel, with polycarbonate inner panels
Design and construction
Main contractorNovarka with 50/50 partners Vinci Construction Grands Projets and Bouygues Travaux Publics as well as Mammoet for conveyance
Website
https://www.chnpp.gov.ua/en/

The New Safe Confinement (NSC or New Shelter) is a structure put in place in 2016 to confine the remains of the number 4 reactor unit at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, in Ukraine, which was destroyed during the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. The structure also encloses the temporary Shelter Structure (sarcophagus) that was built around the reactor immediately after the disaster. The New Safe Confinement is designed to prevent the release of radioactive contaminants, protect the reactor from external influence, facilitate the disassembly and decommissioning of the reactor, and prevent water intrusion. [2]

Contents

The New Safe Confinement is a megaproject that is part of the Shelter Implementation Plan and supported by the Chernobyl Shelter Fund. It was designed with the primary goal of confining the radioactive remains of reactor 4 for 100 years. [4] It also aims to allow for a partial demolition of the original sarcophagus, which was hastily constructed by Chernobyl liquidators after a beyond design-basis accident destroyed the reactor. [5] The word confinement is used rather than the traditional containment to emphasize the difference between the containment of radioactive gases—the primary focus of most reactor containment buildings—and the confinement of solid radioactive waste, which is the primary purpose of the New Safe Confinement. [6]

In 2015, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) stated that the international community was aiming to close a €100 million funding gap, with administration by the EBRD in its role as manager of the Chernobyl decommissioning funds. The total cost of the Shelter Implementation Plan, of which the New Safe Confinement is the most prominent element, is estimated to be around €2.15 billion (US$2.3 billion). The New Safe Confinement accounts for €1.5 billion. [7]

The French consortium Novarka with partners Vinci Construction Grands Projets and Bouygues Travaux Publics designed and built the New Safe Confinement. [8] Construction was completed at the end of 2018. [9] [2]

Legacy structure

The original shelter, formally referred to as the Shelter Structure and often called the sarcophagus, was constructed between May and November 1986. It was an emergency measure to confine the radioactive materials within reactor 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The shelter was constructed under extreme conditions, with very high levels of radiation, and under extreme time constraints. The Shelter Structure was moderately successful in confining radioactive contamination and providing for post-accident monitoring of the destroyed nuclear reactor unit; it has been estimated that up to 95% of the original radioactive inventory of reactor 4 remains inside the ruins of the reactor building. [10]

The Shelter Structure is primarily supported by the damaged remains of the reactor 4 building. These are largely considered to be structurally unsound as a result of explosive forces caused by the accident. Three major structural members support the roof of the Shelter Structure. Two beams, usually referred to as B-1 and B-2, run in an east-west direction and support the roof beams and panels. A third, more massive member, the "Mammoth Beam", spans the largest distance across the roof from east to west and assists in supporting the roof beams and panels. The roof of the shelter consists of 1 metre (3 ft 3 in) diameter steel pipes laid horizontally north to south, and steel panels that rest at an angle, also in the north-south direction.

The Shelter Structure was never intended to be a permanent containment structure. [11] Its continued deterioration has increased the risk of its radioactive inventory leaking into the environment. Between 2004 and 2008, workers stabilized the roof and western wall of the shelter. However, construction of the New Safe Confinement was necessary to continue confining the radioactive remains of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant reactor 4.

Further upgrades to the area in preparation for New Safe Confinement construction were completed in 2010. These included road and rail connections, site services (power, water, drains, and communications), facilities for workers (including medical and radiation protection facilities), and the installation of a long-term monitoring system. [12]

International design competition

In 1994, Ukraine's government held an international competition for proposals to replace the sarcophagus. [13]

In the autumn of 1992, Design Group Partnership (DGP) of Manchester was invited to assist the Atomic Energy Authority (AEA) for the UK's submission for the international competition organized by the Ukrainian government.

DGP's senior management was assembled to generate a solution. David Haslewood suggested an arch, built off-site, and then slid over the existing Soviet-built sarcophagus because:

Of the 394 entries, only the British submission proposed a sliding arch approach. [14] There was no top design choice, but the French submission came as second best with the UK and German proposals coming joint third.

Subsequently, a pan-European study (the TACIS programme) re-examined the proposals of the competition's top three finalists. The study selected the sliding arch concept as the best solution for their further investigations and recommendations, primarily to reduce the chance of the construction workers receiving a harmful dose of radiation. The French consortium named Novarka eventually won the contract for the final sliding arch design.

On 17 September 2007 Vinci Construction Grands Projets and Bouygues Travaux Publics announced that they won the contract to design and build the New Safe Confinement as 50/50 partners of the French consortium Novarka. The original 432 million euros contract comprises the design and construction of the New Safe Confinement and planned to employ 900 people at its peak. [8]

The project has involved workers and specialists from at least 24 countries in addition to Ukraine. [15]

Structural design

Infographics about the New Safe Confinement 1121-Txernobylgo zentral nuklearrerako sarkofago berria-en.svg
Infographics about the New Safe Confinement

The New Safe Confinement design is an arch-shaped steel structure with an internal height of 92.5 metres (303.5 ft) and a 12-metre (39.4 ft) distance between the centers of the upper and lower arch chords. The internal span of the arch is 245 metres (803.8 ft), and the external span is 270 metres (885.83 ft). The dimensions of the arch were determined based on the need to operate equipment inside the new shelter and decommission the existing shelter. The overall length of the structure is 150 metres (492.1 ft), consisting of 13 arches assembled 12.5 metres (41 ft) apart to form 12 bays. Vertical walls assembled around, but not supported by the existing structures of the reactor building seal the ends of the structure.

The arches are constructed of tubular steel members and are externally clad with three-layer sandwich panels. These external panels are also used on the end walls of the structure. Internally, polycarbonate panels cover each arch to prevent the accumulation of radioactive particles on the frame members.

Large parts of the arches were shop-fabricated and transported to the assembly site 180 metres (590 ft) west of reactor 4. The steel used in the construction of the tubular members has a yield strength of no less than 2,500  kg/cm2 (250  MPa ; 36,000  psi ).

To prevent corrosion of the structure, stainless steel was chosen as the material for the inner and outer walls. An air conditioning system also circulates warm, dry air at 50 Pa between the layers of the panels to further prevent corrosion. Dehumidifiers keep the air below 40% humidity, preventing both condensation and water from dripping into the interior of the structure. [16] [17]

Design goals

The New Safe Confinement was designed with the following criteria:

Foundation design

The foundations of the New Safe Confinement were designed to meet the primary requirements:

The site of the New Safe Confinement is slightly sloped, ranging in elevation from 117.5 metres (385 ft) on the eastern side to 144 metres (472 ft) on the western side. The foundation was required to account for this difference without extensive site leveling.

The ground upon which the foundation was built is unique in that it contains a technogenic layer just below the surface that is approximately 2.5 to 3 metres (8 to 10 ft) in overall depth. Radioactive contamination from the accident created the technogenic layer. It consists of various materials including nuclear material, stone, sand, loamy sands, unreinforced concrete, and construction wastes. It is considered unfeasible to determine the geotechnical characteristics of this soil layer. As a result of this, no assumptions about the load-bearing properties of the technogenic layer were made during the design of the foundation.

The water table at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant fluctuates from 109.9 metres (360.6 ft) on average in December to 110.7 metres (363.2 ft) on average in May.

Several options were considered for the foundation design for the New Safe Confinement. Ultimately, the final design was specified as consisting of three lines of two 4.50-by-1.00-metre (14.76 by 3.28 ft) foundation panels, each 21 metres (68.9 ft) in length, and a 4-metre (13.1 ft) high pile cap that reaches to a height of 118 metres (387 ft) of elevation. This option was selected to minimize the cost of the foundation, the number of cuts into radioactive soil layers, dose uptake of workers, and risk to the environment from further contamination. The foundation has a slight elevation difference between the area in which the New Safe Confinement was constructed and the final resting area around reactor 4.

Special consideration was necessary for the excavation required for foundation construction due to the high level of radioactivity found in the upper layers of soil. The conceptual designers of the New Safe Confinement recommended the use of rope operated grabs for the first 0.3 metres (11.8 in) of pile excavation for the Chernobyl site. This reduced the direct exposure of workers to the most contaminated sections of the soil. Deeper excavation for the foundation piles were accomplished using hydraulic clam shells operated under bentonite slurry protection.

The foundation is designed to withstand horizontal acceleration structural loads of up to 0.08  g , as well as to withstand an F3 tornado. The original design for the structure required it to withstand an F1 tornado until an independent beyond-design-basis analysis was carried out to evaluate the effects of an F3 tornado on the structure.

Assembly process

The system used in the assembly of the New Safe Confinement derived from civilian bridge launching and bridge cantilever methods. The New Safe Confinement was assembled in the following steps:

  1. Stabilization of the Shelter Structure to prevent collapse during construction.
  2. Excavation and construction of the foundation.
  3. Assembly of first and second arches to form Bay 1, installation of east wall on arch 1.
  4. Bay 1 was slid East to accommodate the construction of arch 3 and Bay 2.
  5. Subsequent sliding of the complete structure and adding of arches and bays to complete the structure.
  6. Installation of cranes and large maintenance equipment.
  7. Installation of the west wall.
  8. Final slide into place over reactor 4. [9]
  9. Deconstruction of the fragmentation, decontamination, and auxiliary buildings. (planned)

This process of assembly was deemed advantageous because it took advantage of the designed mobility of the structure to maximize the distance between workers and the reactor building, thereby minimizing their exposure to radiation.

As each bay was completed, infrastructure equipment—including that for ventilation systems, radiation monitoring, plumbing, and electrical was installed.

Positioning

The New Safe Confinement was constructed 180 metres (590 ft) west of reactor 4, and slid into place. Sliding of the structure along foundation rails was a difficult process. It was pushed on Teflon pads by hydraulic pistons, and guided by lasers. [18] As of 2018, the New Safe Confinement is the world's largest movable land-based structure. [19] [20] [21]

Two options were initially considered for moving the structure: hydraulic jacks to push the structure forward, or pulling the structure with large, multi-stranded steel cables. The first option would require the relocation of the hydraulic jacks after each push. This process would necessitate more worker interaction with the system and a greater worker exposure to radiation. The second option was initially chosen because it would expose workers to a lower radiation dose, and would have moved the structure into its final position in less than 24 hours. However, the structure was moved using hydraulic jacks, beginning the 327-metre (1,073 ft) move on November 14, 2016, and finishing on November 29. [9] [20]

Demolition of existing structures

The operational phase of the New Safe Confinement involves the demolition of the unstable structures associated with the original Shelter Structure. The goal of demolition has imposed significant requirements upon the load carrying capacity of the arches and foundation of the New Safe Confinement, as these structures must carry the weight of not only the disassembled structure, but also the suspended cranes to be used in demolition.

Demolition equipment

The New Safe Confinement design includes two bridge cranes suspended from the arches. [22] These cranes travel east to west on common runways and each has a span of 84 metres (276 ft).

Each crane can carry a variety of interchangeable carriages. Three types of carriages have been designed for the New Safe Confinement:

The cranes' carriage interchangeability allows the rotation of the largest members to be demolished, reducing the overall size of the New Safe Confinement by approximately one arch bay.

After the members to be demolished are removed by crane, they must be fragmented into pieces small enough to decontaminate. It is expected that the primary contamination of most demolished elements will be loose surface dust and can easily be removed. Decontamination will take place using vacuum cleaners with HEPA filters, grit blasting (for steel elements), and scarifying (for concrete elements). Once decontaminated to the maximum extent practical, pieces will be further fragmented for eventual disposal. Fragmentation tools include plasma arc cutting torches, diamond circular cutting wheels, and diamond wire cutting. The tools selected for the demolition process were selected based on a number of factors including minimization of individual and collective radiation exposure, the amount of secondary waste generated, the feasibility of remote operation, the cutting efficiency, fire safety, capital cost and operating costs.

The exact methods for disposing of wastes generated by the demolition process have not been determined, and may include on-site burial outside the New Safe Confinement for low-level waste, and long-term storage inside the New Safe Confinement for medium and high-level wastes. As of 2018, no policy has been decided for the disposal and processing of fuel containing materials.

Elements to be demolished

The following elements of the Shelter Structure are planned for demolition:

ElementQuantityMass of each
(tonnes)
Length of each
(meters)
Length of each
(feet)
Southern roof flat panels63128.794.2
Southern roof flat panels61628.794.2
Southern hockey stick panels123825.583.7
Mammoth beam112770229.7
Northern beam B116555180.4
Southern beam B116555180.4
Northern hockey stick panels1891859.1
Eastern hockey stick panels17.25723.0
Light roof62136118.1
Piping roof272036118.1
Northern beam B215740131.2
Southern beam B215740131.2
Total851944.25

Types of materials to be demolished

The elements that are to be demolished fall into several broad material types:

Waste storage

For the removal and storage of nuclear waste within the New Safe Confinement area, the strategies for removing waste is split into three systems. [24] Disposal of solid nuclear waste had the Vector Radioactive Waste Storage Facility [25] built near to the Chernobyl site, consisting of the Industrial Complex for Solid Radwaste Management (ICSRM), [26] a nuclear waste storage site. It is being constructed by Nukem Technologies, a German nuclear decommissioning company, a subsidiary of the Russian Atomstroyexport. This storage is reported to be able to contain 75,000 cubic metres (98,000 cubic yards) of material. [27] [28] The storage is for both temporary high level waste as well as low and intermediate level long-term waste storage. [29] [30]

The Plant on Liquid Radwaste Management (PLRWM) was constructed to remove, store, and process liquid nuclear waste from the Chernobyl site. [31] [32] Processed liquid is turned into solid waste in 200-L barrels where it can then be stored long-term, at a rate of 2,500 cubic meters a year. [33]

Spent fuel is stored long-term in the Spent Fuel Storage Facility. [24] [31] 232 storage containers of nuclear waste can be stored in the facility for an expected 100 years. [34]

Worker safety and radioactive exposure

Even with the distance given from the main reactor during construction of the New Safe Confinement, construction workers were still subject to radiation. Before the slippage procedure began, construction workers may only have been able to stay on the site for 30 minutes at a time due to radiation. [35] The concrete foundation reduced radiation to workers when assembling the structure, and workers were provided decontaminated housing during construction. [35]

Radioactive dust in the shelter is monitored by hundreds of sensors. [16] Workers in the 'local zone' carry two dosimeters, one showing real-time exposure and the second recording information for the worker's dose log. [36] Workers have a daily and annual radiation exposure limit. Their dosimeter beeps if the limit is reached, and the worker's site access is cancelled. [36] The annual limit (20 millisieverts) may be reached by spending 12 minutes above the roof of the 1986 sarcophagus, or a few hours around its chimney. [15] Workers are required to also check their radiation exposure before they leave the New Safe Confinement as an additional measurement for safety. [37]

To minimize radiation to workers when working inside of the New Safe Confinement, many robots and tools are used to interact with objects inside the shelter remotely. The two installed bridge cranes can be operated from within an isolated control room, which allows for demolition to occur without posing risk to any operators. [23] For the radiation mapping that occurs within the New Safe Confinement, robots have been deployed in both areas of high contamination where humans cannot enter and replacing routes that operators would normally take. [38] [39] Boston Dynamics' Spot model has been implemented in areas of higher radiation to provide detailed radiation mapping without causing additional radiation spikes by minimizing contact points with radiated surfaces. [38] Without posing risk to workers, the implemented systems were able to look inside reactor 4, deep within the New Safe Confinement. [40]

Project timeline and status

There has been concern about Ukraine's ability to properly maintain the New Safe Confinement, with Deputy project manager Victor Zalizetskyi stating that "It looks like Ukraine will be left alone to deal with this structure" [41]

Then-planned completion date
YearPlanned
completion
2005
June 2003February 2008
20092012
February 20102013 [42]
April 2011Summer 2015. [7]
November 2016November 2017
December 2017December 2018

The New Safe Confinement was originally intended to be completed in 2005, but the project suffered lengthy delays.

Major project milestones include:

March 2004
An international tender for New Safe Confinement design and construction is announced. Two bid candidates are identified, but in September 2006 the plant's general director Ihor Hramotkyn announces his intent to annul all bids on the project. [43]
September 17, 2007
The project contract is signed, with French consortium Novarka  [ de ] (consisting of Vinci Construction Grands Projets and Bouygues Construction as 50/50 partners) constructing the 190 by 200 metres (620 by 660 feet) arch structure. Construction costs are estimated at $1.4bn with a project time of five years. [44] The estimated time for completion is given as 53 months, including 18 months of planning and design studies, with a projected completion in mid-2012. [8]
2009
Progress is made with stabilization of the existing sarcophagus, which is then considered stable enough for another 15 years.
September 2010
Novarka begins construction. [45]
April 2011
Some project milestones, including infrastructure and preparatory work such as the New Safe Confinement pilings, are completed. [7]
April 2012
Steel erection begins. [36]
November 26, 2012
The first sections are raised. [46] [47]
June 13, 2013
The second lifting operation on the eastern arch is performed.
April 2014
The fully lifted eastern arch is moved 112 metres (367 feet) eastward on its rails to a parking position to clear the construction area for building the western arch.
August 4, 2014
The western arch completes the second of three lifting operations which raises the height of the arch.
November 12, 2014
Successful completion of the third ascent of the western part arches.
April 2015
The two arches are fused, and the west wall is under construction.
April 2016
Construction of the arches is completed. [48]
November 14, 2016
The arch slipping procedure begins. [20]
November 29, 2016
The New Safe Confinement slipping is completed, taking a total of fifteen days. [49] It is pushed on polytetrafluoroethylene pads by hydraulic pistons, guided by lasers. [18]
November 2017
Development company Rodina begins construction on the first PV project to be developed within the Chernobyl exclusion zone. 3,762 solar modules will be installed at the site with a generation capacity of 1 MW. [50]
December 2017
Construction completion is delayed until late 2018 due to a contractor being unable to finish its work in time. [51] The reason is the extremely high level of radiation, forcing workers to limit their presence at the site. [52]
January 2019
Various subsystems are in operation, including the radiation monitoring system, the back-up power supply system, the fire protection system, as well as lighting, communication, and HVAC. [53]
April 25, 2019
Successful conclusion of the 72-hour trial operation test. [54]
July 2019
Construction on the €1.5 billion structure is completed and the sarcophagus is opened to media visits on July 3. [55] [56] On July 10, government officials, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, attended a ceremony where the transfer of ownership of the New Safe Confinement was given to the Ukrainian government. [54]
February 24, 2022
During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces subsequently captured Chernobyl. [57] While there is an increase in radiation in the area, this is due to Russian forces disturbing the soil in the Red Forest and releasing radioactive dust and not from the reactor 4 itself. [58] The New Safe Confinement is reportedly unharmed. [59]
March 31, 2022
Russian forces leave Chernobyl and the New Safe Confinement. [60]

Responsible organizations

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is responsible for managing the Shelter Implementation Plan, including overseeing the construction of the New Safe Confinement. [61]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sellafield</span> Nuclear site in Cumbria, England

Sellafield, formerly known as Windscale, is a large multi-function nuclear site close to Seascale on the coast of Cumbria, England. As of August 2022, primary activities are nuclear waste processing and storage and nuclear decommissioning. Former activities included nuclear power generation from 1956 to 2003, and nuclear fuel reprocessing from 1952 to 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dry cask storage</span> Radioactive waste storage method

Dry cask storage is a method of storing high-level radioactive waste, such as spent nuclear fuel that has already been cooled in the spent fuel pool for at least one year and often as much as ten years. Casks are typically steel cylinders that are either welded or bolted closed. The fuel rods inside are surrounded by inert gas. Ideally, the steel cylinder provides leak-tight containment of the spent fuel. Each cylinder is surrounded by additional steel, concrete, or other material to provide radiation shielding to workers and members of the public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear and radiation accidents and incidents</span> Severe disruptive events involving fissile or fusile materials

A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility." Examples include lethal effects to individuals, large radioactivity release to the environment, or a reactor core melt. The prime example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which a reactor core is damaged and significant amounts of radioactive isotopes are released, such as in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl exclusion zone</span> Exclusion zone and disaster area in Ukraine

The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Zone of Alienation is an officially designated exclusion zone around the site of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor disaster. It is also commonly known as the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, the 30-Kilometre Zone, or simply The Zone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mayak</span> Nuclear reprocessing plant in Russia

The Mayak Production Association is one of the largest nuclear facilities in the Russian Federation, housing a reprocessing plant. The closest settlements are Ozyorsk to the northwest and Novogornyi to the south.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant</span> Decommissioned nuclear power plant in Ukraine

The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant is a nuclear power plant undergoing decommissioning. ChNPP is located near the abandoned city of Pripyat in northern Ukraine, 16.5 kilometers (10 mi) northwest of the city of Chernobyl, 16 kilometers (10 mi) from the Belarus–Ukraine border, and about 100 kilometers (62 mi) north of Kyiv. The plant was cooled by an engineered pond, fed by the Pripyat River about 5 kilometers (3 mi) northwest from its juncture with the Dnieper river.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant</span> Decommissioned nuclear power plant in Visaginas Municipality, Lithuania

The Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant is a decommissioned two-unit RBMK-1500 nuclear power station in Visaginas Municipality, Lithuania. It was named after the nearby city of Ignalina. Due to the plant's similarities to the infamous Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in both reactor design and lack of a robust containment building, Lithuania agreed to close the plant as part of its agreement of accession to the European Union. Unit 1 was closed in December 2004; Unit 2 in December 2009, the plant accounted for 25% of Lithuania's electricity generating capacity and supplied about 70% of Lithuania's electrical demand, was closed on December 31, 2009. Proposals have been made to construct a new nuclear power plant at the site, but such plans have yet to come to fruition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl disaster</span> 1986 nuclear accident in the Soviet Union

The Chernobyl disaster began on 26 April 1986 with the explosion of the No. 4 reactor of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant near the city of Pripyat in the north of the Ukrainian SSR, close to the border with the Byelorussian SSR, in the Soviet Union. It is one of only two nuclear energy accidents rated at seven—the maximum severity—on the International Nuclear Event Scale, the other being the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident. The initial emergency response and subsequent mitigation efforts involved more than 500,000 personnel and cost an estimated 18 billion roubles—roughly US$68 billion in 2019, adjusted for inflation. It was the worst nuclear disaster in history, and the costliest disaster in human history, costing an estimated US$700 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear safety and security</span> Regulations for uses of radioactive materials

Nuclear safety is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "The achievement of proper operating conditions, prevention of accidents or mitigation of accident consequences, resulting in protection of workers, the public and the environment from undue radiation hazards". The IAEA defines nuclear security as "The prevention and detection of and response to, theft, sabotage, unauthorized access, illegal transfer or other malicious acts involving nuclear materials, other radioactive substances or their associated facilities".

Nuclear decommissioning is the process leading to the irreversible complete or partial closure of a nuclear facility, usually a nuclear reactor, with the ultimate aim at termination of the operating licence. The process usually runs according to a decommissioning plan, including the whole or partial dismantling and decontamination of the facility, ideally resulting in restoration of the environment up to greenfield status. The decommissioning plan is fulfilled when the approved end state of the facility has been reached.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of nuclear power</span>

Nuclear power has various environmental impacts, both positive and negative, including the construction and operation of the plant, the nuclear fuel cycle, and the effects of nuclear accidents. Nuclear power plants do not burn fossil fuels and so do not directly emit carbon dioxide. The carbon dioxide emitted during mining, enrichment, fabrication and transport of fuel is small when compared with the carbon dioxide emitted by fossil fuels of similar energy yield, however, these plants still produce other environmentally damaging wastes. Nuclear energy and renewable energy have reduced environmental costs by decreasing CO2 emissions resulting from energy consumption.

Nuclear entombment is a method of nuclear decommissioning in which radioactive contaminants are encased in a structurally long-lived material, such as concrete. This prevents radioactive material and other contaminated substances from being exposed to human activity and the environment. Entombment is usually applied to nuclear reactors, but also some nuclear test sites. Nuclear entombment is the least used of three methods for decommissioning nuclear power plants, the others being dismantling and deferred dismantling. The use of nuclear entombment is more practical for larger nuclear power plants that are in need of both long and short term burials, as well as for power plants which seek to terminate their facility licenses. Entombment is used on a case-by-case basis because of its major commitment with years of surveillance and complexity until the radioactivity is no longer a major concern, permitting decommissioning and ultimate unrestricted release of the property. Considerations such as financial backing and the availability of technical know-how are also major factors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kyshtym disaster</span> 1957 radiological contamination disaster in the Soviet Union

The Kyshtym disaster, sometimes referred to as the Mayak disaster or Ozyorsk disaster in newer sources, was a radioactive contamination accident that occurred on 29 September 1957 at Mayak, a plutonium production site for nuclear weapons and nuclear fuel reprocessing plant located in the closed city of Chelyabinsk-40 in Chelyabinsk Oblast, Russian SFSR, Soviet Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant sarcophagus</span> Structure covering destroyed unit 4 at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant

The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant sarcophagus or Shelter Structure is a massive steel and concrete structure covering the nuclear reactor number 4 building of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The sarcophagus resides inside the New Safe Confinement structure. The New Safe Confinement is designed to protect the environment while the sarcophagus undergoes demolition and the nuclear cleanup continues. The sarcophagus was designed to limit radioactive contamination of the environment following the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, by encasing the most dangerous area and protecting it from climate exposure. It is located within a large restricted area known as the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.

The Fukushima disaster cleanup is an ongoing attempt to limit radioactive contamination from the three nuclear reactors involved in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster that followed the earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011. The affected reactors were adjacent to one another and accident management was made much more difficult because of the number of simultaneous hazards concentrated in a small area. Failure of emergency power following the tsunami resulted in loss of coolant from each reactor, hydrogen explosions damaging the reactor buildings, and water draining from open-air spent fuel pools. Plant workers were put in the position of trying to cope simultaneously with core meltdowns at three reactors and exposed fuel pools at three units.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear labor issues</span> Radiation workers health and labor issues

Nuclear labor issues exist within the international nuclear power industry and the nuclear weapons production sector worldwide, impacting upon the lives and health of laborers, itinerant workers and their families.

The Andreev Bay nuclear accident took place at Soviet naval base 569 in February 1982. Andreev Bay is a radioactive waste repository 55 km northwest of Murmansk and 60 km from the Norwegian border, on the western shore of the Zapadnaya Litsa. The repository entered service in 1961. In February 1982, a nuclear accident occurred in which radioactive water was released from a pool in building #5. Cleanup of the accident took place from 1983 to 1989. About 700,000 tonnes of highly radioactive water leaked into the Barents Sea during that time. About 1,000 people took part in the cleanup effort. Vladimir Konstantinovich Bulygin, who was in charge of the naval fleet's radiation accidents, received the Hero of the Soviet Union distinction for his work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elephant's Foot (Chernobyl)</span> Radioactive mass created during meltdown

The Elephant's Foot is the nickname given to a large mass of corium and other materials formed underneath the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, near Pripyat, Ukraine, during the Chernobyl disaster of April 1986, notable for its extreme radioactivity. It is named for its wrinkly appearance, evocative of the foot of an elephant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl groundwater contamination</span> Groundwater contaminated from the Chernobyl disaster

The Chernobyl disaster remains the major and most detrimental nuclear catastrophe which completely altered the radioactive background of the Northern Hemisphere. It happened in April 1986 on the territory of the former Soviet Union. The catastrophe led to the increase of radiation in nearly one million times in some parts of Europe and North America compared to the pre-disaster state. Air, water, soils, vegetation and animals were contaminated to a varying degree. Apart from Ukraine and Belarus as the worst hit areas, adversely affected countries included Russia, Austria, Finland and Sweden. The full impact on the aquatic systems, including primarily adjacent valleys of Pripyat river and Dnieper river, are still unexplored.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capture of Chernobyl</span> Part of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone was captured on 24 February, the first day of the invasion, by the Russian Armed Forces, who entered Ukrainian territory from neighbouring Belarus and seized the entire area of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant by the end of that day. On 7 March, it was reported that around 300 people were trapped and had been unable to leave the power plant since its capture. On 31 March, it was reported that most of the Russian troops occupying the area had withdrawn, as the Russian military abandoned the Kyiv offensive to focus on operations in Eastern Ukraine.

References

Notes

  1. "Chernobyl's New Safe Confinement". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Retrieved December 27, 2023.
  2. 1 2 3 "Chernobyl's New Safe Confinement". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Retrieved May 31, 2018.
  3. 1 2 "Transforming Chernobyl brochure". EBRD. March 11, 2015. Retrieved September 13, 2018.
  4. "Chernobyl's New Safe Confinement". www.ebrd.com. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
  5. "Contract for early Chernobyl dismantling work signed : Waste & Recycling – World Nuclear News". world-nuclear-news.org. Retrieved September 2, 2020.
  6. "Chernobyl's New Safe Confinement". www.ebrd.com. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
  7. 1 2 3 Reiserer, Axel (April 8, 2011). "NOVARKA and Chernobyl Project Management Unit confirm cost and time schedule for Chernobyl New Safe Confinement". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Archived from the original on September 18, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011.
  8. 1 2 3 "Vinci and Bouygues sign contract to build Containment Shelter for the Chernobyl Sarcophagus" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 2, 2011. Retrieved April 19, 2011.
  9. 1 2 3 "Unique engineering feat concluded as Chernobyl arch has reached resting place". European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. November 29, 2016. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  10. Vidal, John (April 19, 2011). "Ukraine raises $785m to seal Chernobyl under new 'shell'". The Guardian . Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  11. Inside Chernobyl's Mega Tomb, http://www.windfallfilms.com/show/6894/inside-chernobyls-mega-tomb.aspx.
  12. "Chernobyl 25 years on: New Safe Confinement and Spent Fuel Storage Facility" (PDF). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. January 2011. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  13. International Competition, 1994. Ukraine Government.
  14. Smith, Stuart; Lacombe, Herve (February 1997). "A second shelter for Chernobyl: Its necessity and feasibility". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 120 (1): 2–14. doi:10.1680/icien.1997.29157.
  15. 1 2 Meo, Nick (November 26, 2013). "Chernobyl's arch: Sealing off a radioactive sarcophagus". BBC News.
  16. 1 2 Excell, John (February 11, 2013). "Building Chernobyl's New Safe Confinement". The Engineer . Archived from the original on September 27, 2015. Retrieved February 13, 2013.
  17. "New Safe Containment Project Cuts Corrosion Risk at Chernobyl". www.materialsperformance.com. Retrieved May 1, 2022.
  18. 1 2 "Chernobyl New Safe Confinement: a one-of-a-kind project" (PDF). Vinci SA . November 29, 2016. p. 21. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 25, 2017. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  19. "Chernobyl Shelter To Begin Full Operation In December, Says Ukraine President". www.nucnet.org. The Independent Global Nuclear News Agency. November 29, 2017. Retrieved September 12, 2018.
  20. 1 2 3 "Chernobyl disaster: Giant shield begins move towards reactor". BBC News. November 14, 2016. Retrieved November 30, 2016.
  21. Borys, Christian (January 3, 2017). "A vast new tomb for the most dangerous waste in the world". BBC Future Now. Retrieved March 2, 2018.
  22. "Chernobyl New Safe Confinement (NSC), Ukraine". Power Technology. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  23. 1 2 3 Parameswaran, N. A. (Vijay); Chornyy, Igor; Owen, Rob; de Saint Victor, François (September 8, 2013). "Unique and Massive Chernobyl Cranes for Deconstruction Activities in the New Safe Confinement". Proceedings of the ASME 2013 15th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. Volume 2: Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning; Environmental Remediation; Environmental Management/Public Involvement/Crosscutting Issues/Global Partnering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. doi:10.1115/icem2013-96346. ISBN   978-0-7918-5602-4.
  24. 1 2 Lidar, Per; Bergh, Niklas; Larsson, Arne; Hedin, Gunnar (September 8, 2013). "Waste Management Strategy for Cost Effective and Environmentally Friendly NPP Decommissioning". Proceedings of the ASME 2013 15th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. Volume 2: Facility Decontamination and Decommissioning; Environmental Remediation; Environmental Management/Public Involvement/Crosscutting Issues/Global Partnering. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. doi:10.1115/icem2013-96006. ISBN   978-0-7918-5602-4.
  25. "News". Delegation of the European Union to Ukraine. Archived from the original on July 20, 2011. Retrieved July 31, 2008.[ better source needed ]
  26. "Industrial Complex For Solid Radwaste Management (ICSRM) at Chernobyl Nuclear Powerplant" (PDF). Nukem Technologies. May 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 3, 2008. Retrieved July 31, 2008.
  27. Gache, Gabriel (April 25, 2008). "Chernobyl Receives Nuclear Waste Processing Complex". Softpedia.com.
  28. "Nuclear waste storage inaugurated in Chernobyl". EU Business. Archived from the original on July 24, 2008.
  29. Tokarevskyi, O.; Alekseeva, Z.; Kondratiev, S.; Rybalka, N. (November 2013). Safety issues in construction of facilities for long-term storage of radioactive waste at Vector site (PDF). Eurosafe Forum 2013. Cologne, Germany. inis..RN:45021661 . Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  30. Lee, William E.; Ojovan, Michael I.; Jantzen, Carol M. (October 31, 2013). Radioactive Waste Management and Contaminated Site Clean-Up: Processes, Technologies and International Experience. Elsevier Science. pp. 404–406. ISBN   978-0-85709-744-6.
  31. 1 2 Semenova, Iryna Y.; Steinberg, Nikolay A. (September 30, 2001). "Chernobyl NPP Decommissioning and "Shelter" Object Transformation: Problems of Activity Coordination". Proceedings of the ASME 2001 8th International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Remediation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. pp. 997–1000. doi:10.1115/icem2001-1177. ISBN   978-0-7918-8017-3.
  32. "Chernobyl starts tackling its liquid radioactive waste". Bellona.org. February 7, 2018. Retrieved May 7, 2022.
  33. Татьяна, Грива. "Liquid Radioactive Waste Treatment Plant (LRTP)". chnpp.gov.ua. Retrieved May 7, 2022.
  34. "Ukraine authorizes Chernobyl spent fuel storage". www.ans.org. Retrieved May 7, 2022.
  35. 1 2 "Progress at Chernobyl New Safe Confinement". ProQuest. ProQuest   1776617288 . Retrieved May 7, 2022.
  36. 1 2 3 Hankinson, Andrew (January 3, 2013). "Containing Chernobyl: the mission to defuse the world's worst nuclear disaster site". Wired .
  37. "See Chernobyl's Safe Confinement Shelter". Bechtel Corporate. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  38. 1 2 Ackerman, Evan (November 23, 2020). "Boston Dynamics' Spot Is Helping Chernobyl Move Towards Safe Decommissioning". IEEE Spectrum. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  39. "Radiation-mapping robots deployed at Chernobyl". Nuclear Newswire. American Nuclear Society (ANS). October 13, 2021. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  40. University of Bristol (October 7, 2021). "Bristol team gains unprecedented access to Chernobyl's Reactor 4". Newswise. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  41. "Ukraine will 'struggle' to maintain new Chernobyl shelter". www.9news.com.au. July 11, 2019.
  42. "Chernobyl New Safe Confinement - New Completion Date Announced". Chernobyl and Eastern Europe. February 15, 2010. Archived from the original on July 8, 2011. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  43. "Ukraine may hold new tenders on Chernobyl safety facility". BBC Monitoring International Reports. September 27, 2006. Archived from the original on May 8, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2013.
  44. "Chernobyl to be covered in steel". BBC News. September 18, 2007. Retrieved May 20, 2010.
  45. "Work begins on new sarcophagus for Chernobyl reactor". Nuclear Power Daily. September 24, 2010. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
  46. "Workers raise first section of new Chernobyl shelter". 3 News. Associated Press. November 28, 2012. Archived from the original on February 23, 2013.
  47. Heintz, Jim (November 17, 2012). "Workers raise 1st section of new Chernobyl shelter". Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 20, 2013. Workers have raised the first section of a colossal arch-shaped structure that eventually will cover the exploded nuclear reactor at the Chernobyl power station.
  48. "$1.7B Giant Arch to Block Chernobyl Radiation For Next 100 Years". NBC News. Reuters. March 24, 2016. Retrieved November 20, 2016.
  49. "Unique engineering feat concluded as Chernobyl arch has reached resting place" (Press release). European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. November 29, 2016. Retrieved November 30, 2016.
  50. "Rodina begins construction on first PV project inside Chernobyl exclusion zone". PV Tech. November 9, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  51. "Ukraine postpones Chernobyl reactor safety cover". Xinhua News Agency . Archived from the original on December 6, 2017. Retrieved November 20, 2017.
  52. Seidler, Christoph (December 20, 2017). "Strahlung zu hoch: Fertigstellung des Tschernobyl-Sarkophags verzögert sich". Spiegel Online (in German). Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  53. "Chernobyl confinement structure systems begin operation – World Nuclear News". world-nuclear-news.org. World Nuclear Association. February 8, 2019. Retrieved February 9, 2019.
  54. 1 2 "Delivery of the Chernobyl New Safe Confinement". VINCI. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  55. Vidal, John (August 1, 2019). "What should we do with radioactive nuclear waste?". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  56. Dedaj, Paulina (July 3, 2019). "Chernobyl's $1.7B nuclear confinement shelter revealed after taking 9 years to complete". Fox News. Retrieved August 2, 2019.
  57. "Chernobyl nuclear plant targeted as Russia invades Ukraine". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  58. "Unprotected Russian soldiers disturbed radioactive dust in Chernobyl's 'Red Forest', workers say". Reuters. March 29, 2022. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  59. "Explained: Why did Russian troops seize control of Chernobyl nuclear disaster site?". The Indian Express. March 3, 2022. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  60. Varenytsia, Cara Anna and Inna. "A nuclear risk 'nightmare'? After seizing Chernobyl, Russian troops exposed themselves to radiation". USA TODAY. Retrieved May 6, 2022.
  61. Onishi, Yasuo; Voitsekhovich, Oleg V.; Zheleznyak, Mark J. (June 3, 2007). Chernobyl – What Have We Learned?: The Successes and Failures to Mitigate Water Contamination Over 20 Years. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 248. ISBN   978-1-4020-5349-8.

Further reading