Clinical empathy

Last updated

Clinical empathy is expressed as the skill of understanding what a patient says and feels, and effectively communicating this understanding to the patient. [1] The opposite of clinical empathy is clinical detachment. Detached concern, or clinical detachment, is the ability to distance oneself from the patient in order to serve the patient from an objective standpoint. [2] For physicians to maximize their role as providers, a balance must be developed between clinical detachment and clinical empathy. [3]

Contents

In 2001, an instrument was created to measure a physician's empathy towards each patient. This tool is called the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. [4] The 20-item questionnaire was originally developed for administration to medical students and physicians but has extended to dentistry and nursing because it is easy to interpret, administer, and analyze. [5] [6]

From a student's first year to their fourth year in medical school, empathy scores on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (S-version) decrease. [7] Both gender and specialty choice affect empathy scores, favoring women and primary care specialties. [8]

Clinical empathy

Clinical empathy is a main component of the patient-provider relationship. It is seen as a commonly accepted pillar of professionalism for medical students. [9] Empathy involves both cognitive and affective aspects. [10] The cognitive domain revolves around understanding a patient's experiences and being able to understand the world from their point of view. This contrasts the affective aspect of empathy which involves joining in the patient's emotional experiences and feelings, which correlates closer to sympathy. [4] Empathetic physicians share understanding with patients, which serves to benefit the patient in their physical, mental and social well-being. Both a provider's ability to provide empathetic care as well as a perception of this care by the patient are important in diagnosis and treatment. [11] Developing the ability to understand a patient's thoughts and feelings lends itself to a successful medical interview and collaborative treatment. [12] Practicing empathy in a clinical setting leads to greater patient satisfaction, [13] better compliance, [14] and fewer lawsuits. [15]

Clinical detachment

Clinical detachment is a means of providing objective, detached medical care while maintaining enough concern for the patient to offer emotional understanding. [16] A close patient-provider relationship threatens objectivity, therefore a social distance is expected to ensure professionalism. [17] Students in medical school are taught clinical detachment as a protective mechanism for dealing with emotional experiences such as death and dying. [18] Clinical detachment is also a means of dealing with the pressure of making mistakes [19] and medical uncertainty. [20] Suppression and repression of emotions, intellectualization, and humor are mechanisms used to confront distressing situations in order to give an objective assessment. [21]

Jefferson Medical College Main Building 132 S. 10th Street Jefferson Medical College Main Building 132 S. 10th Street.jpg
Jefferson Medical College Main Building 132 S. 10th Street

Measurement

Because empathy is a multi-faceted and complex concept, measurement proves to be difficult. [22] Although there are scales to measure empathy such as the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, developed by Davis, the Emotional Empathy Scale, developed by Mehrabian and Epstein, and the Hogan Empathy Scale, they were not created explicitly to measure physician empathy. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy was created at the Center for Research in Medical Education and Health Care (CRMEHC) at Jefferson Medical College to measure patient perceptions of empathy from their provider. Construct validity, criterion-related validity, predictive validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability all provide empirical support for the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. [23] The scale was originally intended for distribution to medical students and physicians. [4] Since its creation, it has been translated into 53 languages [24] and applied to other medical professions such as dentistry and nursing. [5] Three versions of the scale now exist, one for medical students (S-version), one for health professions (HP-version), and one for health professions students (HPS-version). [24] Results of the 20 item questionnaire provide that higher scores are related to higher levels of empathy in interpersonal care.

Role in medical education

Medical students' first experience with a patient is often with a cadaver in a gross anatomy course. Working intimately with a cadaver during a gross anatomy course captures the essence of the patient-provider relationship. [25] Cadaver dissection is a challenging emotional and mental experience. Involvement, emotional coping, and ability are three themes that develop during the dissection experience. [26] Medical students in a gross anatomy course may experience mixed emotions and variable reactions to cadaver dissection. Students who view their donor as a scientific specimen are less opposed to dissection, whereas students who view their donor as a former living person face greater difficulty with dissection and foster feelings of empathy towards the cadaver. [27] Because of the emotional impact of dissection, students may develop detached concern to cope with these feelings. [28]

In western countries, medical education emphasizes a "body as first patient" philosophy for dissection. [29] This anonymizes cadavers which fosters a different relationship than in eastern countries. Many eastern countries adopt a mindset of donor as "first teacher". For example, in Thailand, students are encouraged to develop a personal relationship with their donors. The students are instructed to view their donors with the highest honor and view the cadavers as a "great teacher". [30] This intention allows medical students to form a relationship that is familiar to them, one of a teacher and student, as opposed to approaching their donor as a doctor, a practice that new and unfamiliar to students. [31] Although eastern and western countries handle cadaver relationships differently, it can be generalized that gross anatomy courses offer an opportunity for students to examine their feelings on life, death, and dying. [32] These courses also promote development of coping strategies for stressful situations. [29]

Over the course of medical education, males and females differ in their attitudes and execution of empathetic treatment. Students entering people-oriented specialties such as family medicine, general internal medicine, and other primary care specialties have higher scores on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, whereas students entering technology-oriented specialties such as pathology, radiology, and anesthesiology score lower on empathy. [8] Female students are more likely to enter people-oriented specialties whereas men are more likely to enter technology-oriented specialties. [12] Female students score higher than male students on the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy across all years of medical school education. Female students also have a greater likelihood than men to disagree with a need for detached concern in order to provide the best medical treatment. [33]

Several studies have indicated that clinical empathy may decline in students during medical school, with a change even being observed from the start to the end of first year. [34] If this is the case, there could be negative consequences, as it is feared that a reduction in empathy may affect professionalism and quality of care.

A recent study investigate the causes of the decline. [35] It seems that a "hidden curriculum" which includes a high workload, paucity of adequate role models, and lack of support can cause adaptations such as cynicism and detachment. In addition, the decrease may be due to the medical curriculum which may cause students to develop more of a scientific instead of a holistic approach to medicine. [36] [37] ). Another reason is that medical school is a competitive environment that can cause students to prioritise their performance in medical school, rather than maintaining a caring demeanour. [38] Similarly, it has also been suggested that as the pressure to obtain medical knowledge increases throughout medical school, students become more worried about retaining this knowledge alongside having to remain empathetic and caring towards patients. Students are more likely to lose their empathic qualities as compensation to allow them to still feel as though they are capable of learning all of the information they are required to. [39] Furthermore, as students’ progress through medical school, they may be more likely to dehumanise patients to protect themselves from feelings of distress as they encounter increasingly challenging patients. As a result their empathy for patients may suffer. [40]

Maintenance

Many methods have been put forward which aim to maintain the empathy of healthcare students and professionals with varying success. [41] Interventions have included medical humanities and creative arts around a patient narrative, writing interventions including creative writing and blogging, drama, formal communication and inter-personal skills training and problem based learning. [41]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicine</span> Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of illness

Medicine is the science and practice of caring for a patient, managing the diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, treatment, palliation of their injury or disease, and promoting their health. Medicine encompasses a variety of health care practices evolved to maintain and restore health by the prevention and treatment of illness. Contemporary medicine applies biomedical sciences, biomedical research, genetics, and medical technology to diagnose, treat, and prevent injury and disease, typically through pharmaceuticals or surgery, but also through therapies as diverse as psychotherapy, external splints and traction, medical devices, biologics, and ionizing radiation, amongst others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of anatomy</span> Aspect of history

The history of anatomy extends from the earliest examinations of sacrificial victims to the sophisticated analyses of the body performed by modern anatomists and scientists. Written descriptions of human organs and parts can be traced back thousands of years to ancient Egyptian papyri, where attention to the body was necessitated by their highly elaborate burial practices.

Internal medicine, also known as general internal medicine in Commonwealth nations, is a medical specialty for medical doctors focused on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of internal diseases in adults. Medical practitioners of internal medicine are referred to as internists, or physicians in Commonwealth nations. Internists possess specialized skills in managing patients with undifferentiated or multi-system disease processes. They provide care to both hospitalized (inpatient) and ambulatory (outpatient) patients and often contribute significantly to teaching and research. Internists are qualified physicians who have undergone postgraduate training in internal medicine, and should not be confused with "interns", a term commonly used for a medical doctor who has obtained a medical degree but does not yet have a license to practice medicine unsupervised.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dissection</span> Cutting procedure used in anatomy

Dissection is the dismembering of the body of a deceased animal or plant to study its anatomical structure. Autopsy is used in pathology and forensic medicine to determine the cause of death in humans. Less extensive dissection of plants and smaller animals preserved in a formaldehyde solution is typically carried out or demonstrated in biology and natural science classes in middle school and high school, while extensive dissections of cadavers of adults and children, both fresh and preserved are carried out by medical students in medical schools as a part of the teaching in subjects such as anatomy, pathology and forensic medicine. Consequently, dissection is typically conducted in a morgue or in an anatomy lab.

Gross anatomy is the study of anatomy at the visible or macroscopic level. The counterpart to gross anatomy is the field of histology, which studies microscopic anatomy. Gross anatomy of the human body or other animals seeks to understand the relationship between components of an organism in order to gain a greater appreciation of the roles of those components and their relationships in maintaining the functions of life. The study of gross anatomy can be performed on deceased organisms using dissection or on living organisms using medical imaging. Education in the gross anatomy of humans is included training for most health professionals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical education</span> Education related to the practice of being a medical practitioner

Medical education is education related to the practice of being a medical practitioner, including the initial training to become a physician and additional training thereafter.

A medical specialty is a branch of medical practice that is focused on a defined group of patients, diseases, skills, or philosophy. Examples include those branches of medicine that deal exclusively with children (paediatrics), cancer (oncology), laboratory medicine (pathology), or primary care. After completing medical school or other basic training, physicians or surgeons and other clinicians usually further their medical education in a specific specialty of medicine by completing a multiple-year residency to become a specialist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University of Minnesota Medical School</span>

The University of Minnesota Medical School is a medical school at the University of Minnesota. It is a combination of two campuses located in Minneapolis and Duluth, Minnesota.

A tissue bank is an establishment that collects and recovers human cadaver tissue for the purposes of medical research, education and allograft transplantation. A tissue bank may also refer to a location where biomedical tissue is stored under cryogenic conditions and is generally used in a more clinical sense.

The doctor–patient relationship is a central part of health care and the practice of medicine. A doctor–patient relationship is formed when a doctor attends to a patient's medical needs and is usually through consent. This relationship is built on trust, respect, communication, and a common understanding of both the doctor and patients' sides. The trust aspect of this relationship goes is mutual: the doctor trusts the patient to reveal any information that may be relevant to the case, and in turn, the patient trusts the doctor to respect their privacy and not disclose this information to outside parties.

Most physicians in the United States hold either the Doctor of Medicine degree (MD) or the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine degree (DO). Institutions awarding the MD are accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME). Institutions awarding the DO are accredited by the Commission on Osteopathic College Accreditation (COCA). The World Directory of Medical Schools lists both LCME accredited MD programs and COCA accredited DO programs as US medical schools. Foreign-trained osteopaths do not hold DO degrees and are not recognized as physicians in the United States or in other jurisdictions.

Maintenance of Certification (MOC) is a recently implemented and controversial process of physician certification maintenance through one of the 24 approved medical specialty boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS) and the 18 approved medical specialty boards of the American Osteopathic Association (AOA). The MOC process is controversial within the medical community, with proponents claiming that it is a voluntary program that improves physician knowledge and demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning. Critics claim that MOC is an expensive, burdensome, involuntary and clinically irrelevant process that has been created primarily as a money-making scheme for the ABMS and the AOA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cadaver</span> Dead body used for study or instruction

A cadaver or corpse is a dead human body. Cadavers are used by medical students, physicians and other scientists to study anatomy, identify disease sites, determine causes of death, and provide tissue to repair a defect in a living human being. Students in medical school study and dissect cadavers as a part of their education. Others who study cadavers include archaeologists and arts students. In addition, a cadaver may be used in the development and evaluation of surgical instruments.

A prosection is the dissection of a cadaver or part of a cadaver by an experienced anatomist in order to demonstrate for students anatomic structure. In a dissection, students learn by doing; in a prosection, students learn by either observing a dissection being performed by an experienced anatomist or examining a specimen that has already been dissected by an experienced anatomist.

Clinical clerkships encompass a period of medical education in which students – medical, nursing, dental, or otherwise – practice medicine under the supervision of a health practitioner.

Night Doctors are bogeymen of African American folklore, resulting from some factual basis.

Clinical physiology is both an academic discipline within the medical sciences and a clinical medical specialty for physicians in the health care systems of Sweden, Denmark and Finland. Clinical physiology is characterized as a branch of physiology that uses a functional approach to understand the pathophysiology of a disease.

The history of medicine in France focuses on how the medical profession and medical institutions in France have changed over time. Early medicine in France was defined by, and administered by, the Catholic church. Medicine and care were one of the many charitable ventures of the church. During the era of the French Revolution, new ideas took hold within the world of medicine and medicine was made more scientific and the hospitals were made more medical. Paris Medicine is a term defining the series of changes to the hospital and care received with a hospital that occurred during the period of the French Revolution. Ideas from the Enlightenment and Scientific Revolution were introduced into the medical field.

Physician burnout has been classified as a psychological syndrome that can be expressed as a prolonged response to due chronic occupational stressors. In the practice of medicine, it has been known to affect a wide variety of individuals from medical students to practicing physicians; although, its impact reaches far beyond that. Because of the toll taken on the healthcare industry, various treatment and prevention strategies have been developed at individual, team, and organizational levels in hopes to seek the best method of addressing this epidemic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teaching hospital</span> Hospital or clinic providing medical education

A teaching hospital is a hospital or medical centre that provides medical education and training to future and current health professionals. Teaching hospitals are almost always affiliated with one or more universities and are often co-located with medical schools.

References

  1. Olson, Joanne K. (December 1995). "Relationships Between Nurse-Expressed Empathy, Patient-Perceived Empathy and Patient Distress". Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 27 (4): 317–322. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1995.tb00895.x. PMID   8530122.
  2. Tseng, Wei-Ting; Lin, Ya-Ping (6 May 2016). "'Detached concern' of medical students in a cadaver dissection course: A phenomenological study". Anatomical Sciences Education. 9 (3): 265–271. doi: 10.1002/ase.1579 . PMID   26587913.
  3. Body of Work: Meditations on Mortality from the Human Anatomy Lab. ISBN   978-1-4295-4753-6.[ page needed ]
  4. 1 2 3 Hojat, Mohammadreza; Mangione, Salvatore; Nasca, Thomas J.; Cohen, Mitchell J. M.; Gonnella, Joseph S.; Erdmann, James B.; Veloski, Jon; Magee, Mike (2 July 2016). "The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 61 (2): 349–365. doi:10.1177/00131640121971158. S2CID   144762663.
  5. 1 2 Sherman, JJ; Cramer, A (March 2005). "Measurement of changes in empathy during dental school". Journal of Dental Education. 69 (3): 338–45. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.3.tb03920.x. PMID   15749944.
  6. Fields, Sylvia K.; Hojat, Mohammadreza; Gonnella, Joseph S.; Mangione, Salvatore; Kane, Gregory; Magee, Mike (22 June 2016). "Comparisons of Nurses and Physicians on an Operational Measure of Empathy". Evaluation & the Health Professions. 27 (1): 80–94. doi:10.1177/0163278703261206. PMID   14994561. S2CID   33787233.
  7. Chen, Daniel; Lew, Robert; Hershman, Warren; Orlander, Jay (26 July 2007). "A Cross-sectional Measurement of Medical Student Empathy". Journal of General Internal Medicine. 22 (10): 1434–1438. doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0298-x. PMC   2305857 . PMID   17653807.
  8. 1 2 Hojat, Mohammadreza; Zuckerman, Marvin; Magee, Mike; Mangione, Salvatore; Nasca, Thomas; Vergare, Michael; Gonnella, Joseph S. (November 2005). "Empathy in medical students as related to specialty interest, personality, and perceptions of mother and father". Personality and Individual Differences. 39 (7): 1205–1215. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.04.007.
  9. Veloski, J. Jon; Fields, Sylvia K.; Boex, James R.; Blank, Linda L. (April 2005). "Measuring Professionalism: A Review of Studies with Instruments Reported in the Literature between 1982 and 2002". Academic Medicine. 80 (4): 366–370. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200504000-00014 . PMID   15793022. S2CID   25491105.
  10. Library Resource Finder: More Details for: Empathy : a social psychological approach. Brown & Benchmark Publishers. 1994-01-17. ISBN   978-0-697-16894-8 . Retrieved 2016-03-23.{{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  11. Glaser, Karen M.; Markham, Fred W.; Adler, Herbert M.; McManus, Patrick R.; Hojat, Mohammadreza (2007-07-01). "Relationships between scores on the Jefferson Scale of physician empathy, patient perceptions of physician empathy, and humanistic approaches to patient care: a validity study". Medical Science Monitor. 13 (7): CR291–294. PMID   17599021.
  12. 1 2 Hegazi, Iman; Wilson, Ian (19 June 2013). "Maintaining empathy in medical school: It is possible". Medical Teacher. 35 (12): 1002–1008. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.802296. PMID   23782049. S2CID   15910933.
  13. Bertakis, KD; Roter, D; Putnam, SM (February 1991). "The relationship of physician medical interview style to patient satisfaction". The Journal of Family Practice. 32 (2): 175–81. PMID   1990046.
  14. DiMatteo, M. Robin; Sherbourne, Cathy Donald; Hays, Ron D.; Ordway, Lynn; Kravitz, Richard L.; McGlynn, Elizabeth A.; Kaplan, Sherrie; Rogers, William H. (1993). "Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study". Health Psychology. 12 (2): 93–102. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.12.2.93. PMID   8500445.
  15. Beckman, Howard B. (27 June 1994). "The Doctor-Patient Relationship and Malpractice". Archives of Internal Medicine. 154 (12): 1365–70. doi:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420120093010. PMID   8002688.
  16. Lief & Fox (1963). "Training for "detached concern" in medical students". The Psychological Basis of Medical Practice.
  17. Kadushin, Charles (March 1962). "Social Distance Between Client and Professional". American Journal of Sociology. 67 (5): 517–531. doi:10.1086/223189. S2CID   144204312.
  18. Fox, John (July 2016). "'Notice How You Feel': An Alternative to Detached Concern Among Hospice Volunteers". Qualitative Health Research. 16 (7): 944–961. doi:10.1177/1049732306290233. PMID   16894225. S2CID   27466286.
  19. Bosk, Charles L. (2003-10-15). Forgive and Remember: Managing Medical Failure (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. ISBN   978-0-226-06678-3.
  20. Fox, Renée C. (1980-01-01). "The Evolution of Medical Uncertainty". The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly. Health and Society. 58 (1): 1–49. doi:10.2307/3349705. JSTOR   3349705. PMID   6903782.
  21. Lief (1963). "Training for "detached concern" in medical students". The Psychological Basis of Medical Practice.
  22. Alligood, Martha R.; May, Barbara A. (19 August 2016). "A Nursing Theory of Personal System Empathy: Interpreting a Conceptualization of Empathy in King's Interacting Systems". Nursing Science Quarterly. 13 (3): 243–247. doi:10.1177/08943180022107645. PMID   11847804. S2CID   43477474.
  23. Fields, Sylvia K.; Mahan, Pamela; Tillman, Paula; Harris, Jeffrey; Maxwell, Kaye; Hojat, Mohammadreza (9 May 2011). "Measuring empathy in healthcare profession students using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Health provider – student version". Journal of Interprofessional Care. 25 (4): 287–293. doi:10.3109/13561820.2011.566648. PMID   21554061. S2CID   34221329.
  24. 1 2 "Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Thomas Jefferson University". www.jefferson.edu. Archived from the original on 2019-04-01. Retrieved 2016-03-15.
  25. Aziz, M. Ashraf; Mckenzie, James C.; Wilson, James S.; Cowie, Robert J.; Ayeni, Sylvanus A.; Dunn, Barbara K. (15 February 2002). "The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics". The Anatomical Record. 269 (1): 20–32. doi: 10.1002/ar.10046 . PMID   11891622.
  26. Madill, Anna; Latchford, Gary (April 2005). "Identity change and the human dissection experience over the first year of medical training" (PDF). Social Science & Medicine. 60 (7): 1637–1647. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.035. PMID   15652694. ProQuest   230467568.
  27. Hafferty, Frederic W.; Hafferty, Associate Professor of Behavioral Sciences Frederic W. (1991). Into the valley : death and the socialization of medical students. Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-05144-5.
  28. Hildebrandt, Sabine (8 March 2010). "Developing empathy and clinical detachment during the dissection course in gross anatomy". Anatomical Sciences Education. 3 (4): 216. doi:10.1002/ase.145. hdl: 2027.42/77510 . PMID   20213694. S2CID   45575377.
  29. 1 2 Bertman, Sandra L.; Marks, S. C. (1985-09-01). "Humanities in medical education: rationale and resources for the dissection laboratory". Medical Education. 19 (5): 374–381. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1985.tb01340.x. PMID   4058336. S2CID   39127574.
  30. Winkelmann, Andreas; Güldner, Fritz H (18 December 2004). "Cadavers as teachers: the dissecting room experience in Thailand". BMJ. 329 (7480): 1455–1457. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1455. PMC   535977 . PMID   15604182.
  31. Bohl, Michael; Bosch, Peter; Hildebrandt, Sabine (July 2011). "Medical students' perceptions of the body donor as a 'First Patient' or 'Teacher': A pilot study". Anatomical Sciences Education. 4 (4): 208–213. doi:10.1002/ase.231. hdl: 2027.42/87042 . PMID   21618447. S2CID   22322454.
  32. Coombs, Robert H. (1978-01-01). Mastering Medicine: Professional Socialization in Medical School. Free Press. ISBN   978-0-02-906640-9.
  33. Dickinson, George E.; Lancaster, Carol J.; Winfield, Idee C.; Reece, Eleanor F.; Colthorpe, Christopher A. (1997). "Detached concern and death anxiety of first-year medical students: Before and after the gross anatomy course". Clinical Anatomy. 10 (3): 201–207. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2353(1997)10:3<201::AID-CA5>3.0.CO;2-W . PMID   9135887. S2CID   25398679.
  34. Neumann, Melanie; Edelhäuser, Friedrich; Tauschel, Diethard; Fischer, Martin R.; Wirtz, Markus; Woopen, Christiane; Haramati, Aviad; Scheffer, Christian (August 2011). "Empathy Decline and Its Reasons: A Systematic Review of Studies With Medical Students and Residents". Academic Medicine. 86 (8): 996–1009. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318221e615 . PMID   21670661. S2CID   8641952.
  35. Howick J, Dudko M, Feng SN, Ahmed A, Alluri N, Nockels K, Winter R, Holland R (April 2023). "Why might medical student empathy change throughout medical school? a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies". BMC Medical Education. 23 (270): 270. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04165-9 . PMC   10124056 . PMID   37088814.
  36. Artiran Igde, Fusun; Sahin, Mustafa Kursat (9 October 2017). "Changes in empathy during Medical Education: An example from Turkey". Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 33 (5): 1177–1181. doi:10.12669/pjms.335.13074. PMC   5673729 . PMID   29142560.
  37. Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Academic Medicine, 86(8), 996–1009.
  38. MacLeod, Anna (25 December 2010). "Caring, competence and professional identities in medical education". Advances in Health Sciences Education. 16 (3): 375–394. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9269-9. PMID   21188513. S2CID   36370998.
  39. Good, Byron J.; Good, Mary-Jo DelVecchio (1993). "'Learning Medicine': The Constructing of Medical Knowledge at Harvard Medical School". Knowledge, Power and Practice: The Anthropology of Medicine and Everyday Life. pp. 81–107.
  40. Werner, ER; Korsch, BM (March 1976). "The vulnerability of the medical student: posthumous presentation of L.L. Stephens' ideas". Pediatrics. 57 (3): 321–8. doi:10.1542/peds.57.3.321. PMID   768890. S2CID   40271431.
  41. 1 2 Batt-Rawden, Samantha A.; Chisolm, Margaret S.; Anton, Blair; Flickinger, Tabor E. (August 2013). "Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review". Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 88 (8): 1171–1177. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3 . ISSN   1938-808X. PMID   23807099.