D.C. and Maryland v. Trump

Last updated

D.C. and Maryland v. Trump
DistrictCourtMarylandSeal.png
Court United States District Court for the District of Maryland
DecidedDismissed as moot (January 25, 2021) 592 U.S. 20-331
Defendant Donald Trump
Counsel for plaintiff(s)Natalie O Ludaway
Steven M Sullivan
Patrick Hughes
Plaintiff(s)The District of Columbia
The State of Maryland
Citation(s)No. 8:17-cv-01596
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Peter Jo Messitte

D.C. and Maryland v. Trump was a lawsuit filed on June 12, 2017, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The plaintiffs, the U.S. state of Maryland and the District of Columbia, alleged that the defendant, President Donald Trump, had violated the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution by accepting gifts from foreign governments. [1] [2] The lawsuit was filed by D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine and Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh. [2] [3]

Contents

The suit alleged that Trump had committed "unprecedented constitutional violations" by not disentangling his business interests from his presidential responsibilities. [3] The attorneys general cited the Trump International Hotel's effect on business in the Washington D.C. area as one reason for filing the lawsuit. [4] The suit sought an injunction to stop Trump from violating the emoluments clause of the Constitution. [2] [3] The attorneys general stated they would seek Trump's tax returns as part of their case. [5]

A three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case in July 2019, ruling that the attorneys general lacked legal standing to sue. [6] All three of the judges were appointed by Republican presidents. [7] New arguments in an en banc rehearing of the appeal were heard on December 12, 2019. [8] [9]

On May 14, 2020, the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the defense's attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds of presidential immunity by a 9-to-6 majority, reviving the lawsuit. [10] On January 25, 2021, five days after Trump left office, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a summary disposition ordering the Fourth Circuit to dismiss the case as moot. [11]

Context

The Maryland filing follows a lawsuit filed in January 2017 by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, CREW v. Trump , which also alleged that Trump has violated the emoluments clause. [3] [12] The D.C. and Maryland lawsuit is the first time a government entity has sued a president for violating the clause. [1] [2] [3]

In response to the lawsuit on the day of the filing, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer stated that the president was not in violation of the emoluments cause, and would "move to dismiss this case", which Spicer characterized as "partisan politics". [3] [13] [14] Spicer noted that both attorneys general filing the suit are Democrats. [15] Republican National Committee spokesperson Lindsay Jancek also stated that President Trump was in compliance with the law, and called the lawsuit "absurd". [12]

President Trump was served on June 27, 2017. [16] On November 28, 2017, the plaintiffs won the right to subpoena documents from the Trump Organization, forcing it to retain any documents relevant to the suit. [17]

On July 25, 2018, Federal District Judge Peter Messitte allowed the case to proceed; denying DOJ's motion to dismiss. [18] The Justice Department argued that the clause was not relevant to Trump's businesses. [18] On November 2, Judge Messitte ordered discovery to begin. [19] On December 3, Maryland and the District of Columbia issued subpoenas for Trump's financial records related to his D.C. hotel. [20] [21] [22] [23] Days later the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the DOJ's request for a stay, halting the subpoena of documents, [24] [25] pending the outcome of a hearing scheduled for March 2019. [24]

In December 2018, Maryland prosecutors subpoenaed financial documents of the Trump Organization's golf resorts in Scotland. [26]

At a hearing on March 18, 2019, a three-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals was sharply skeptical of the legal basis of the suit, [27] and dismissed the case on July 10, 2019. [6] [7] The plaintiffs' motion for rehearing en banc (before the entire Court) were granted, with oral arguments held on December 12. [8] [9] On May 14, 2020, the full Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the panel decision and revived the lawsuit, rejecting (by 9-to-6 vote) the defense's attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds of "presidential immunity". [10] [28] The parallel CREW v. Trump case, which was brought in New York federal court, was also reinstated in September 2019. [29] [8] [30]

On January 25, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that both cases were now moot, on the grounds that Trump was no longer president, ordering the lower courts to dismiss them. [31]

On May 11, 2021, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the case. [32]

See also

Related Research Articles

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that groups could sue to challenge their inclusion on the Attorney General's List of Subversive Organizations. The decision was fractured on its reasoning, with each of the Justices in the majority writing separate opinions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard J. Leon</span> American judge (born 1949)

Richard J. Leon is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brian Frosh</span> American politician

Brian E. Frosh is an American lawyer and politician who served as the Attorney General of Maryland from 2015 to 2023. He also served five terms in the Maryland State Senate, representing Maryland's District 16 in Montgomery County. Prior to serving in the Senate, Frosh also represented District 16 in the Maryland House of Delegates, serving two four-year terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emmet G. Sullivan</span> American judge (born 1947)

Emmet Gael Sullivan is an American attorney and jurist serving as a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karen L. Henderson</span> American judge (born 1944)

Karen LeCraft Henderson is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and a former United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter J. Messitte</span> American judge

Peter Jo Messitte is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Personal and business legal affairs of Donald Trump</span>

From the 1980s until he was elected president in 2016, Donald John Trump Sr. and his businesses were involved in over 4,000 legal cases in U.S. federal and state courts, including battles with casino patrons, million-dollar real estate lawsuits, personal defamation lawsuits, and over 100 business tax disputes. He has also been accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault, with one accusation resulting in Trump being held civilly liable.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Efforts to impeach Donald Trump</span> Efforts to impeach the 21st-century US president

Various people and groups assert that former U.S. president Donald Trump engaged in impeachable activity both before and during his presidency, and talk of impeachment began before he took office. Grounds asserted for impeachment have included possible violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution by accepting payments from foreign dignitaries; alleged collusion with Russia during the campaign for the 2016 United States presidential election; alleged obstruction of justice with respect to investigation of the collusion claim; and accusations of "Associating the Presidency with White Nationalism, Neo-Nazism and Hatred", which formed the basis of a resolution for impeachment brought on December 6, 2017.

<i>CREW v. Trump</i> Lawsuit against Donald Trump concerning emoluments

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. Trump was a case brought before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs, watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), hotel and restaurant owner Eric Goode, an association of restaurants known as ROC United, and an Embassy Row hotel event booker named Jill Phaneuf alleged that the defendant, President Donald Trump, was in violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause, a constitutional provision that bars the president or any other federal official from taking gifts or payments from foreign governments. CREW filed its complaint on January 23, 2017, shortly after Trump was inaugurated as president. An amended complaint, adding the hotel and restaurant industry plaintiffs, was filed on April 18, 2017. A second amended complaint was filed on May 10, 2017. CREW was represented by several prominent lawyers and legal scholars in the case.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal affairs of Donald Trump as president</span>

The following is a list of notable lawsuits involving former United States president Donald Trump. The list excludes cases that only name Trump as a legal formality in his capacity as president, such as habeas corpus requests.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Executive Order 13780</span> 2017 executive order by U.S. President Trump placing travel restrictions on several countries

Executive Order 13780, titled Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States, was an executive order signed by United States President Donald Trump on March 6, 2017. It placed a 90-day restriction on entry to the U.S. by nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and barred entry for all refugees who did not possess either a visa or valid travel documents for 120 days. This executive order—sometimes called "Travel Ban 2.0"—revoked and replaced Executive Order 13769 issued on January 27, 2017.

<i>Intl Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump</i>

International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 883 F. 3d 233, was a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, upholding an injunction against enforcement of Proclamation No. 9645, titled "Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats", a presidential proclamation signed by President Donald Trump on September 24, 2017. The proclamation indefinitely suspends the entry into the U.S. of some or all immigrant and non-immigrant travelers from eight countries. It is a successor to Executive Order 13769, entitled "Protection of the Nation from Terrorist Entry into the United States," which were also enjoined by the District Court of Maryland and the Fourth Circuit in a case decided in 2017 by the same name of International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump, 857 F.3d 554.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trevor N. McFadden</span> American judge (born 1978)

Trevor Neil McFadden is an American lawyer who serves as a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Previously, he was a deputy assistant attorney general in the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice.

<i>Blumenthal v. Trump</i> Lawsuit between members of Congress and Donald Trump concerning emoluments

Blumenthal v. Trump, 949 F.3d 14, was a U.S. constitutional law and federal civil procedure lawsuit heard by Circuit Judges Henderson, Tatel, and Griffith, of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The case was on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, where District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted in part and denied in part the President's motion to dismiss for lack of standing, denied the President's motion to dismiss for failure to state claim, and certified interlocutory appeal.

<i>CREW and National Security Archive v. Trump and EOP</i> Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and National Security Archive v. Trump and EOP, No. 1:17-cv-01228, is a case pending before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs, the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and the archivist National Security Archive, allege that the defendants, President Donald Trump and elements of the Executive Office of the President, are in violation of the Presidential Records Act by deleting electronic messages on Twitter and using other electronic messaging applications without required archival records.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary Kay Vyskocil</span> American judge (born 1958)

Mary Kay Vyskocil is a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and a former United States bankruptcy judge for the same court. President Donald Trump nominated her to the district bench in 2018 and again in 2019, and she was confirmed in 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tax returns of Donald Trump</span> Tax returns of Donald Trump

Donald Trump, President of the United States from January 2017 to January 2021, controversially refused to release his tax returns after being elected president, although he promised to do so during his campaign. In 2021, the Manhattan District Attorney (DA) obtained several years of Trump's tax information, and in late 2022, the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee obtained and released six years of his returns.

Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP, 591 U.S. ___ (2020) was a landmark US Supreme Court case involving subpoenas issued by committees of the US House of Representatives to obtain the tax returns of President Donald Trump, who had litigated against his personal accounting firm to prevent this disclosure, although the committees had been cleared by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Mazars was consolidated with Trump v. Deutsche Bank AG.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (2020–2022)</span>

This is a timeline of events from 2020 to 2022 related to investigations into the many suspicious links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies relating to the Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections. It follows the timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, both before and after July 2016, until November 8, 2016, election day, the transition, the first and second halves of 2017, the first and second halves of 2018, and the first and second halves of 2019.

Cohen Milstein is an American plaintiffs' law firm that engages in large-scale class action litigation. The firm filed a number of lawsuits against Donald Trump during and after his presidency, including a lawsuit which successfully blocked the Trump administration's attempt to roll back the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. Cohen Milstein has made the implementation of corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs a key part of its litigation strategy. The firm has been hired by various state attorneys general to assist in complex litigation, including by suing ExxonMobil over climate change. Anita Hill was formerly of counsel at Cohen Milstein.

References

  1. 1 2 LaFrainere, Sharon (June 12, 2017). "Maryland and D.C. Sue Trump Over His Private Businesses". The New York Times . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Davis, Aaron C. (June 12, 2017). "D.C. and Maryland sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath". The Washington Post . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Gambino, Lauren (June 12, 2017). "'Unprecedented violations': states sue Trump for not separating business ties". The Guardian . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  4. ↑ Witte, Brian (June 12, 2017). "Maryland, D.C. attorneys general file federal lawsuit against Trump". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  5. ↑ Pramuk, Jacob (June 12, 2017). "Two attorneys general sue Trump: Checks and balances 'are failing us'". CNBC . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  6. 1 2 Wamsley, Laurel (July 10, 2019). "Appeals Court Orders Dismissal Of Emoluments Lawsuit Against Trump". NPR . Retrieved July 10, 2019.
  7. 1 2 Harris, Andrew M (July 10, 2019). "Trump Wins Dismissal of Emoluments Case by Maryland and D.C." Bloomberg News . Retrieved July 16, 2019.
  8. 1 2 3 Weiss, Debra Cassens (October 15, 2019). "4th Circuit to reconsider claim that Trump is violating the emoluments clause". ABA Journal . Retrieved October 19, 2019.
  9. 1 2 Polantz, Katelyn (December 12, 2019). "Appeals court divided on future of lawsuit over Trump hotel". CNN . Retrieved December 12, 2019.
  10. 1 2 Williams, Pete (May 14, 2020). "Appeals court gives green light to Trump emoluments lawsuit". NBC News . Retrieved May 14, 2020.
  11. ↑ CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS. January 25, 2021. U.S. Supreme Court.
  12. 1 2 Seitz-Wald, Alex; Siemaszko, Corky (June 12, 2017). "D.C., Maryland Officials Hit President Trump With Lawsuit". NBC News . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  13. ↑ Quinn, Melissa (June 12, 2017). "Sean Spicer: Maryland, DC lawsuit against Trump motivated by 'partisan politics'". Washington Examiner . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  14. ↑ Alesci, Cristina; Disis, Jill (June 12, 2017). "Maryland and D.C. sue Trump over foreign payments". CNN . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  15. ↑ Geewax, Marilyn (June 12, 2017). "Attorneys General Of Maryland And D.C. Sue Trump Over His Businesses". NPR . Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  16. ↑ Affidavit of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Defendant, Civil Process Clerk, United States Attorney General on June 27, 2017, Docket 12, vol. No. 8:17-cv-01596, D.M.D., July 5, 2017{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. ↑ O'Connell, Jonathan (November 30, 2017). "Maryland, D.C. get subpoena power in Trump emoluments suit". The Washington Post . Retrieved November 30, 2017.
  18. 1 2 Overby, Peter (July 25, 2018). "Federal Lawsuit Against President Trump's Business Interests Allowed To Proceed". NPR . Retrieved July 26, 2018.
  19. ↑ LaFraniere, Sharon (November 2, 2018). "Judge Orders Evidence to Be Gathered in Emoluments Case Against Trump". The New York Times . Retrieved November 2, 2018.
  20. ↑ Taylor, Jessica (December 3, 2018). "Subpoenas Coming Soon In Trump Emoluments Lawsuit". NPR . Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  21. ↑ Woellert, Lorraine; Gerstein, Josh (December 3, 2018). "Judge green-lights subpoenas in Trump Hotel lawsuit". Politico . Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  22. ↑ Abdollah, Tami (December 4, 2018). "2 attorneys general to subpoena Trump Organization, Treasury". Associated Press . Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  23. ↑ O'Connell, Jonathan; Marimow, Ann E.; Fahrenthold, David A. (December 4, 2018). "D.C., Maryland begin seeking Trump financial documents in case related to his D.C. hotel". The Washington Post . Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  24. 1 2 Wolfe, Jan (December 21, 2018). "U.S. appeals court grants Trump request for halt to emoluments case". Reuters . Retrieved January 3, 2019.
  25. ↑ Van Voris, Bob (December 20, 2018). "Trump Wins Delay in Emoluments Lawsuit by D.C. and Maryland". Bloomberg News . Retrieved October 19, 2019.
  26. ↑ Anapol, Avery (February 4, 2019). "Prosecutors investigating source of funding for Trump's Scotland golf courses: report". The Hill .
  27. ↑ LaFraniere, Sharon (March 19, 2019). "Appeals Court Judges Appear Skeptical of Emoluments Case Against Trump". The New York Times .
  28. ↑ Bruce Zagaris, 4th Circuit Court of Appeals Permits Emoluments Case against Trump to Continue, International Enforcement Law Reporter Blog May 15, 2020.
  29. ↑ LaFrainere, Sharon (September 13, 2019). "U.S. Appeals Court Reinstates Emoluments Case Against Trump". The New York Times . Retrieved October 19, 2019.
  30. ↑ Mystal, Elie (September 16, 2019). "Emoluments Are Back On The Table: Second Circuit reinstates emoluments lawsuit against Trump". Above the Law . Retrieved October 19, 2019. The Second Circuit's opinion then goes into a point-by-point take down of the Fourth Circuit opinion.
  31. ↑ de Vogue, Ariane; Cole, Devan (January 25, 2021). "Supreme Court dismisses emoluments cases against Trump". CNN .
  32. ↑ The District of Columbia v. Trump (8:17-cv-01596) Court Listener.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.