Delegation

Last updated

Delegation is the process of distributing and entrusting work to another person. [1] In management or leadership within an organisation, it involves a manager aiming to efficiently distribute work, decision-making and responsibility to subordinate workers in an organization. Delegation may result in creation of an accountable chain of authority where authority and responsibility moves down in an organisational structure. [2] Inefficient delegation may lead to micromanagement.

Contents

There are a number of reasons someone may decide to delegate. These include:

Delegation is widely accepted as an essential element of effective management. [4] The ability to delegate is a critical skill in managing effectively. [5] There are a number of factors that facilitate effective delegation by managers, including "Recognising and respecting others’ capabilities; evaluating tasks and communicating how they fit in the big picture; matching people and assignments; providing support and encouragement; tolerating ambiguity and uncertainty; interpreting failure as a key to learning". [5] With organisations being such complex and dynamic entities, the success of objectives relies heavily on how effectively tasks and responsibilities can be delegated. [6]

Process

According to Dr. Kanthi Wijesinghe, Senior Lecturer at the National Institute of Education, "Delegation begins when the manager passes on some of their responsibilities to a subordinate. Responsibility is the work assigned to an individual." [7] Delegation is strongly dependent on a supervisor's ability to communicate, motivate, and understand individual preferences and differences. [5] The process of delegation involves ensuring that a task and appropriate employee have been selected. The process of delegation requires "preparation, initiation, implementation, and closure". [5] While a manager can delegate authority for a task, the ultimate responsibility is not transferred. This means that delegation involves a process of sharing, which may include "authority, power, influence, information, knowledge, or risk". [5] This builds trust and morale between managers and subordinates. The internal and external environment of an organisation is often characterised by many interfering factors. Some of these include "too much urgency, inexperience, and lack of trust". [5] In order to minimise the effect of these factors, a clear delegation protocol should be developed and followed within an organisation.  

The process of delegation does not always follow a set structure, however, some aspects which are typically involved are:

  1. Allocation of duties: the delegator communicates to their subordinate the task which is to be performed. Resources are provided and a time limit is informed.
  2. Delegation of authority: In order for the subordinate to perform the task, authority is required. The required authority is granted to the employee when the task is delegated.
  3. Assignment of responsibilities: When authority is delegated, the subordinate is assigned with the responsibility of this task. When someone is given the rights to complete a task, they are assigned with the corresponding obligation to perform. Responsibility itself cannot be entirely delegated; a manager must still operate under equal responsibility to the delegated authority.
  4. Creation of accountability: At the completion of the delegation process, it is essential that the manager creates accountability, meaning that subordinates must be answerable for the tasks which they have been authorised to carry out. [7]

Principles

There are a number of guidelines which are essential to understanding and implementing the process of delegation. The principles of delegation include:

Principle of result expected

The authority delegated to an individual subordinate needs to be adequate to ensure their ability to accomplish the results expected of the task. [8] Prior to delegation, the manager needs to know the purpose of such delegation and the results which they expect from it. [7] This means that goals, standards of performance and targets need to be clearly outlined to direct the actions of the subordinate to completion of the task. [8]

Principle of parity of authority and responsibility

This principle outlines the concept that authority and responsibility co-exist and must go hand-in-hand. [7] This means that the authority which is delegated to an employee must be consistent and equal to that of their responsibility. [8] "Responsibility without authority is meaningless". [8] Each individual in an organisation requires the necessary authorities in order to effectively carry out assigned tasks; disparity should not exist between the responsibility imposed on and the authority granted to an employee in order to carry out a task. [8]

Principle of absoluteness of responsibility

The principle of absoluteness of responsibility states that delegation of responsibility is not possible. [7] Superiors are unable to relinquish, through the process of delegation, responsibility for the tasks and activities assigned to their subordinates, for they are the ones who delegated this authority and assigned the duty. [8] Responsibility is absolute, with a manager remaining accountable for the actions of their subordinates. [7]

Principle of unity of command

According to the principle of unity of command, employees should only have one supervisor, who they report to, are granted authority by and receive orders from. [7] This employee should be solely accountable to their direct supervisor. This is associated with increased employee efficiency and less role conflict within an organisation. [8]    

The scalar principle

The scalar principle asserts that there are clear and formal lines of hierarchal authority within an organisation. [8] This hierarchy reflects the flow of authority and responsibility. It clearly outlines to managers and subordinates, who has the power to delegate authority and to whom they are answerable to. [7]      

Principle of exception

This principle asserts that employees should be given complete freedom to fulfill their responsibilities within the purview of their authority. [7] Managers should therefore refrain from interfering with the day-today work of their subordinates, even if minor mistakes are recognized. [7] This level of control leads to more efficient results. In some exceptional cases, managers are able to interfere on matters deviating significantly from the norm; in this case the authority delegated to the subordinate may even be withdrawn. [8]    

Advantages and disadvantages

Delegation is an essential and extremely useful management tool. [5] When implemented effectively and successfully delegation results in many benefits to the organisation, manager and subordinate. However, if delegation in unsuccessful and not implemented optimally, the results can lead to serious disadvantages and have resultive effects. [4]



Delegation is one of the best-known methods for efficiently managing time and leads to numerous benefits within an organisation. One of the most significant advantages of delegation is its use for employee motivation and development. The motivating factor associated with delegations comes from the increased confidence transferred from manager to subordinate. [1] When a supervisor demonstrates their confidence it builds staff trust and self-confidence in the employees. [5] There is a highly significant and positive relationship that exists between delegation and trust between an individual employee and management. [2] Leaders are able to empower subordinates through the sharing of supervisor power. [5] This leads to positive reinforcement of the supervisor's role, builds morale and generates organisation trust. [5] Delegation significantly increases effectiveness and efficiency in multiple ways. [5] It eases the challenges relating to management’ workload, increasing responsiveness and growing and developing the capabilities of employees. [4] Organisational resources are managed more efficiently, and subordinates are able to make decisions and perform tasks faster. [4] Through delegation, lower level employees are able to embrace the opportunity to gain experience, build on capabilities and develop skills, which improves the organisation. [4] Delegation is positively related to organisational commitment, task performance, innovative behavior and job satisfaction. [4] At an organisational level, delegation can provide insight into current strengths and weaknesses, providing the opportunity for improvement and growth. [5] It also increases the capacity of an organisation to respond quickly and effectively. [5]


While the benefits are clear, there are a number of potential disadvantages and challenges to effective delegation. Ineffective use of delegation includes allowing no real influence or granting too much authority to someone who is unwilling or unable to make appropriate decisions. [4] Some supervisors find it challenging to delegate tasks for the fear of becoming out of touch with the required skills or giving up something they truly enjoy. [5] Delegation does involve a level of risk and uncertainty, which can be a powerful deterrent to delegation. [4] When supervisors delegate a task, they remain responsible for whether or not it is carried out effectively and must consider the potential risks and rewards as a result of the delegation. [4] Managers are often reluctant to delegate due to concerns that mistakes will be made, or that the job will not be completed to the standard which they believe they could achieve. [5] Another concern relating to delegation is that top-level management can become wary that middle management will delegate for the benefit of their specific needs rather than those general to the organisation. [4]    

Related Research Articles

A performance appraisal, also referred to as a performance review, performance evaluation, (career) development discussion, or employee appraisal, sometimes shortened to "PA", is a periodic and systematic process whereby the job performance of an employee is documented and evaluated. This is done after employees are trained about work and settle into their jobs. Performance appraisals are a part of career development and consist of regular reviews of employee performance within organizations.

Micromanagement is a management style characterized by such behaviors as an excessive focus on observing and controlling subordinates and obsession with details.

Middle management is the intermediate management level of a hierarchical organization that is subordinate to the executive management and responsible for "team leading" line managers and/or "specialist" line managers. Middle management is indirectly responsible for junior staff performance and productivity.

Team management is the ability of an individual or an organization to administer and coordinate a group of individuals to perform a task. Team management involves teamwork, communication, objective setting and performance appraisals. Moreover, team management is the capability to identify problems and resolve conflicts within a team. Teams are a popular approach to many business challenges. They can produce innovative solutions to complex problems. There are various methods and leadership styles a team manager can take to increase personnel productivity and build an effective team. In the workplace teams can come in many shapes and sizes who all work together and depend on one another. They communicate and all strive to accomplish a specific goal. Management teams are a type of team that performs duties such as managing and advising other employees and teams that work with them. Whereas work, parallel, and project teams hold the responsibility of direct accomplishment of a goal, management teams are responsible for providing general direction and assistance to those teams.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Centralisation</span> Process by which control becomes more concentrated

Centralisation or centralization is the process by which the activities of an entity or organization, particularly those regarding planning, decision-making and control of strategies and policies, become concentrated within a particular group, sector, department or region within that entity or organization. This creates a power structure where the said group, known as head or core group, occupies the highest level of hierarchy and has significantly more authority, prestige and influence over the other groups, who are considered its subordinates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Principal–agent problem</span> Conflict of interest when one agent makes decisions on anothers behalf

The principal–agent problem refers to the conflict in interests and priorities that arises when one person or entity takes actions on behalf of another person or entity. The problem worsens when there is a greater discrepancy of interests and information between the principal and agent, as well as when the principal lacks the means to punish the agent. The deviation from the principal's interest by the agent is called "agency costs".

Span of control, also called span of management, is a term used in business management, particularly human resource management. The term refers to the number of subordinates or direct reports a supervisor is responsible for.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supervisor</span> Manager in a business or event

A supervisor, or lead, is the job title of a lower-level management position that is primarily based on authority over workers or a workplace. A supervisor can also be one of the most senior on the staff at the place of work, such as a professor who oversees a Ph.D. dissertation. Supervision, on the other hand, can be performed by people without this formal title, for example by parents. The term supervisor itself can be used to refer to any personnel who have this task as part of their job description.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organizational architecture</span> Procedural structure of an organization

Organizational architecture, also known as organizational design, is a field concerned with the creation of roles, processes, and formal reporting relationships in an organization. It refers to architecture metaphorically, as a structure which fleshes out the organizations. The various features of a business's organizational architecture has to be internally consistent in strategy, architecture and competitive environment.

Organizing or organising is the establishment of effective authority-relationships among selected works, which often improves efficiency.

Management consists of the planning, prioritizing, and organizing work efforts to accomplish objectives within a business organization. A management style is the particular way managers go about accomplishing these objectives. It encompasses the way they make decisions, how they plan and organize work, and how they exercise authority.

Office administration is a set of day-to-day activities that are related to the maintenance of an office building, financial planning, record keeping and billing, personal development, physical distribution and logistics, within an organization. An employee that undertakes these activities is commonly called an office administrator or office manager, and plays a key role in any organization's infrastructure, regardless of the scale. Many administrative positions require the candidate to have an advanced skill set in the software applications Microsoft Word, Excel and Access.

Project governance is the management framework within which project decisions are made. Project governance is a critical element of any project, since the accountabilities and responsibilities associated with an organization's business as usual activities are laid down in their organizational governance arrangements; seldom does an equivalent framework exist to govern the development of its capital investments (projects). For instance, the organization chart provides a good indication of who in the organization is responsible for any particular operational activity the organization conducts. But unless an organization has specifically developed a project governance policy, no such chart is likely to exist for project development activity.

A functional manager is a person who has management authority over an organizational unit—such as a department—within a business, company, or other organization. Functional managers have ongoing responsibilities, and are not usually directly affiliated with project teams, other than ensuring that goals and objectives align with the organization's overall strategy and vision.

POSDCORB is an acronym widely used in the field of management and public administration that reflects the classic view of organizational theory. It appeared most prominently in a 1937 paper by Luther Gulick. However, he first presented the concept in 1935. Initially, POSDCORB was envisioned in an effort to develop public service professionals. In Gulick's own words, the elements are as follows: Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Co-Ordinating, Reporting and Budgeting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Working group</span> Group of experts working together

A working group, is a group of experts working together to achieve specified goals. The groups are domain-specific and focus on discussion or activity around a specific subject area. The term can sometimes refer to an interdisciplinary collaboration of researchers working on new activities that would be difficult to sustain under traditional funding mechanisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fayolism</span> Management theory developed by Henri Fayol

Fayolism was a theory of management that analyzed and synthesized the role of management in organizations, developed around 1900 by the French manager and management theorist Henri Fayol (1841–1925). It was through Fayol's work as a philosopher of administration that he contributed most widely to the theory and practice of organizational management.He is know as the father of general management.

Reward management is concerned with the formulation and implementation of strategies and policies that aim to reward people fairly, equitably and consistently in accordance with their value to the organization.

Managing Up and Managing Down is a part of management that details how middle managers or supervisors should effectively deal with their managers and subordinates. Promotion to management comes with additional responsibility of managing down. With the additional responsibility for managing their team while remaining accountable to their management teams, managers require additional skills and training to effectively influence up or down. Management levels within large organizations are structured from a hierarchal organization and include senior, middle, and lower management roles.

MS 1722:2011 – Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems – Requirements is a Malaysian Standard that provides requirements on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems (OSHMS) and basis for the development OSH systems in an organisation. The MS 1722 standard enable an organization to manage its OHS risks and improve its OHS performance. The requirements of the standard are intended to address OHS for employees, temporary employees, contractors and other personnel on site rather than the safety of products and services. The standards provide a more effective method of protecting employees and others from workplace injuries and illnesses and demonstrate management commitment in meeting OHS requirements.

References

  1. 1 2 Schermerhorn, J., Davidson, P., Poole, D., Woods, P., Simon, A., & McBarron, E. (2017). Management (6th ed., pp. 282–286). Brisbane: John Wiley & Sons Australia.
  2. 1 2 Meagher, Kieron J; Wait, Andrew (11 April 2021). "Worker Trust in Management and Delegation in Organizations". The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 36 (3): 495–536. doi:10.1093/jleo/ewaa008.
  3. ↑ Portny, Stanley E. (2017). Project Management For Dummies. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   978-1-119-34889-4.[ page needed ]
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 G. Banford, Christopher; Ronald Buckley, M.; Roberts, Foster (30 September 2014). "Delegation revisited: how delegation can benefit globally-minded managers". International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 44 (8/9): 646–654. doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-07-2013-0191.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Treher, E., Piltz, D., & Jacobs, S. (2011). Increasing effectiveness through delegation. In A Guide to Success for Technical Managers: Supervising in Research, Development, & Engineering (pp. 89–111). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  6. ↑ Smith, Cassandra C. (2012). Recognizing the Need For, Impacts and Benefits of Effective Delegation In the Work Place (Thesis). DTIC ADA558768.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Rani, S., Renugadevi, C., Ravindran, N., Kuppusamy. (2018). Office Management and Secretaryship 12th Std. Tamil Nadu: Department of School Education
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Marvin, Stephen (2010). Dictionary of Scientific Principles. doi:10.1002/9781118582121. ISBN   978-1-118-58212-1.[ page needed ]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.