Electrospray ionization

Last updated
Electrospray (nanoSpray) ionization source NanoESIFT.jpg
Electrospray (nanoSpray) ionization source

Electrospray ionization (ESI) is a technique used in mass spectrometry to produce ions using an electrospray in which a high voltage is applied to a liquid to create an aerosol. It is especially useful in producing ions from macromolecules because it overcomes the propensity of these molecules to fragment when ionized. ESI is different from other ionization processes (e.g. matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, MALDI) since it may produce multiple-charged ions, effectively extending the mass range of the analyser to accommodate the kDa-MDa orders of magnitude observed in proteins and their associated polypeptide fragments. [1] [2]

Contents

Mass spectrometry using ESI is called electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) or, less commonly, electrospray mass spectrometry (ES-MS). ESI is a so-called 'soft ionization' technique, since there is very little fragmentation. This can be advantageous in the sense that the molecular ion (or more accurately a pseudo molecular ion) is almost always observed, however very little structural information can be gained from the simple mass spectrum obtained. This disadvantage can be overcome by coupling ESI with tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS). Another important advantage of ESI is that solution-phase information can be retained into the gas-phase.

The electrospray ionization technique was first reported by Masamichi Yamashita and John Fenn in 1984, [3] and independently by Lidia Gall and co-workers in Soviet Union, also in 1984. [4] Gall's work was not recognised or translated in the western scientific literature until a translation was published in 2008. [4] The development of electrospray ionization for the analysis of biological macromolecules [5] was rewarded with the attribution of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry to John Bennett Fenn and Koichi Tanaka in 2002. [6] One of the original instruments used by Fenn is on display at the Science History Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

History

Diagram of electrospray ionization in positive mode: under high voltage, the Taylor cone emits a jet of liquid drops. The solvent from the droplets progressively evaporates, leaving them more and more charged. When the charge exceeds the Rayleigh limit the droplet explosively dissociates, leaving a stream of charged (positive) ions ESI positive mode (21589986840).jpg
Diagram of electrospray ionization in positive mode: under high voltage, the Taylor cone emits a jet of liquid drops. The solvent from the droplets progressively evaporates, leaving them more and more charged. When the charge exceeds the Rayleigh limit the droplet explosively dissociates, leaving a stream of charged (positive) ions

In 1882, Lord Rayleigh theoretically estimated the maximum amount of charge a liquid droplet could carry before throwing out fine jets of liquid. [7] This is now known as the Rayleigh limit.

In 1914, John Zeleny published work on the behaviour of fluid droplets at the end of glass capillaries and presented evidence for different electrospray modes. [8] Wilson and Taylor [9] and Nolan investigated electrospray in the 1920s [10] and Macky in 1931. [11] The electrospray cone (now known as the Taylor cone) was described by Sir Geoffrey Ingram Taylor. [12]

The first use of electrospray ionization with mass spectrometry was reported by Malcolm Dole in 1968. [13] [14] John Bennett Fenn was awarded the 2002 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the development of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in the late 1980s. [15]

Ionization mechanism

Fenn's first electrospray ionization source coupled to a single quadrupole mass spectrometer Fenn ESI Instrument.jpg
Fenn's first electrospray ionization source coupled to a single quadrupole mass spectrometer

The liquid containing the analytes of interest (typically 10-6 - 10-4 M needed [16] ) is dispersed by electrospray, [17] into a fine aerosol. Because the ion formation involves extensive solvent evaporation (also termed desolvation), the typical solvents for electrospray ionization are prepared by mixing water with volatile organic compounds (e.g. methanol [18] acetonitrile). To decrease the initial droplet size, compounds that increase the conductivity (e.g. acetic acid) are customarily added to the solution. These species also act to provide a source of protons to facilitate the ionization process. Large-flow electrosprays can benefit from nebulization of a heated inert gas such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide in addition to the high temperature of the ESI source. [19] The aerosol is sampled into the first vacuum stage of a mass spectrometer through a capillary carrying a potential difference of approximately 3000 V, which can be heated to aid further solvent evaporation from the charged droplets. The solvent evaporates from a charged droplet until it becomes unstable upon reaching its Rayleigh limit. At this point, the droplet deforms as the electrostatic repulsion of like charges, in an ever-decreasing droplet size, becomes more powerful than the surface tension holding the droplet together. [20] At this point the droplet undergoes Coulomb fission, whereby the original droplet 'explodes' creating many smaller, more stable droplets. The new droplets undergo desolvation and subsequently further Coulomb fissions. During the fission, the droplet loses a small percentage of its mass (1.0–2.3%) along with a relatively large percentage of its charge (10–18%). [21] [22]

There are two major theories that explain the final production of gas-phase ions: the ion evaporation model (IEM) and the charge residue model (CRM). The IEM suggests that as the droplet reaches a certain radius the field strength at the surface of the droplet becomes large enough to assist the field desorption of solvated ions. [23] [24] The CRM suggests that electrospray droplets undergo evaporation and fission cycles, eventually leading progeny droplets that contain on average one analyte ion or less. [13] The gas-phase ions form after the remaining solvent molecules evaporate, leaving the analyte with the charges that the droplet carried.

IEM, CRM and CEM schematic. IEM, CRM and CEM.png
IEM, CRM and CEM schematic.

A large body of evidence shows either directly or indirectly that small ions (from small molecules) are liberated into the gas phase through the ion evaporation mechanism, [24] [25] [ citation needed ] [26] while larger ions (from folded proteins for instance) form by charged residue mechanism. [27] [28] [29]

A third model invoking combined charged residue-field emission has been proposed. [30] Another model called chain ejection model (CEM) is proposed for disordered polymers (unfolded proteins). [31]

The ions observed by mass spectrometry may be quasimolecular ions created by the addition of a hydrogen cation and denoted [M + H]+, or of another cation such as sodium ion, [M + Na]+, or the removal of a hydrogen nucleus, [M − H]−. Multiply charged ions such as [M + nH]n+ are often observed. For large macromolecules, there can be many charge states, resulting in a characteristic charge state envelope. All these are even-electron ion species: electrons (alone) are not added or removed, unlike in some other ionization sources. The analytes are sometimes involved in electrochemical processes, leading to shifts of the corresponding peaks in the mass spectrum. This effect is demonstrated in the direct ionization of noble metals such as copper, silver and gold using electrospray. [32]

The efficiency of generating the gas phase ions for small molecules in ESI varies depending on the compound structure, the solvent used and instrumental parameters. [33] The differences in ionization efficiency reach more than 1 million times.

Variants

The electrosprays operated at low flow rates generate much smaller initial droplets, which ensure improved ionization efficiency. In 1993 Gale and Richard D. Smith reported significant sensitivity increases could be achieved using lower flow rates, and down to 200 nL/min. [34] In 1994, two research groups coined the name micro-electrospray (microspray) for electrosprays working at low flow rates. Emmett and Caprioli demonstrated improved performance for HPLC-MS analyses when the electrospray was operated at 300–800 nL/min. [35] Wilm and Mann demonstrated that a capillary flow of ~ 25 nL/min can sustain an electrospray at the tip of emitters fabricated by pulling glass capillaries to a few micrometers. [36] The latter was renamed nano-electrospray (nanospray) in 1996. [37] [38] Currently the name nanospray is also in use for electrosprays fed by pumps at low flow rates, [39] not only for self-fed electrosprays. Although there may not be a well-defined flow rate range for electrospray, microspray, and nano-electrospray, [40] studied "changes in analyte partition during droplet fission prior to ion release". [40] In this paper, they compare results obtained by three other groups. [41] [42] [43] and then measure the signal intensity ratio [Ba2+ + Ba+]/[BaBr+] at different flow rates.

Cold spray ionization is a form of electrospray in which the solution containing the sample is forced through a small cold capillary (10–80 °C) into an electric field to create a fine mist of cold charged droplets. [44] Applications of this method include the analysis of fragile molecules and guest-host interactions that cannot be studied using regular electrospray ionization.

Electrospray ionization has also been achieved at pressures as low as 25 torr and termed subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray (SPIN) based upon a two-stage ion funnel interface developed by Richard D. Smith and coworkers. [45] The SPIN implementation provided increased sensitivity due to the use of ion funnels that helped confine and transfer ions to the lower pressure region of the mass spectrometer. Nanoelectrospray emitter is made out of a fine capillary with a small aperture about 1–3 micrometer. For sufficient conductivity this capillary is usually sputter-coated with conductive material, e.g. gold. Nanoelectrospray ionization consumes only a few microliters of a sample and forms smaller droplets. [46] Operation at low pressure was particularly effective for low flow rates where the smaller electrospray droplet size allowed effective desolvation and ion formation to be achieved. As a result, the researchers were later able to demonstrate achieving an excess of 50% overall ionization utilization efficiency for transfer of ions from the liquid phase, into the gas phase as ions, and through the dual ion funnel interface to the mass spectrometer. [47]

Ambient ionization

Diagram of a DESI ambient ionization source DESI ion source.jpg
Diagram of a DESI ambient ionization source

In ambient ionization, the formation of ions occurs outside the mass spectrometer without sample preparation. [48] [49] [50] Electrospray is used for ion formation in a number of ambient ion sources.

Desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) is an ambient ionization technique in which a solvent electrospray is directed at a sample. [51] [52] The electrospray is attracted to the surface by applying a voltage to the sample. Sample compounds are extracted into the solvent which is again aerosolized as highly charged droplets that evaporate to form highly charged ions. After ionization, the ions enter the atmospheric pressure interface of the mass spectrometer. DESI allows for ambient ionization of samples at atmospheric pressure, with little sample preparation.

Diagram of a SESI ambient ionization source Diagram of a SESI ambient ionization source.png
Diagram of a SESI ambient ionization source

Extractive electrospray ionization is a spray-type, ambient ionization method that uses two merged sprays, one of which is generated by electrospray. [49]

Laser-based electrospray-based ambient ionization is a two-step process in which a pulsed laser is used to desorb or ablate material from a sample and the plume of material interacts with an electrospray to create ions. [49] For ambient ionization, the sample material is deposited on a target near the electrospray. The laser desorbs or ablates material from the sample which is ejected from the surface and into the electrospray which produces highly charged ions. Examples are electrospray laser desorption ionization, matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization, and laser ablation electrospray ionization.

SESI-MS SUPER SESI coupled with Thermo Fisher Scientific-Orbitrap SESI-MS.png
SESI-MS SUPER SESI coupled with Thermo Fisher Scientific-Orbitrap

Electrostatic spray ionization (ESTASI) involved the analysis of samples located on a flat or porous surface, or inside a microchannel. A droplet containing analytes is deposited on a sample area, to which a pulsed high voltage to is applied. When the electrostatic pressure is larger than the surface tension, droplets and ions are sprayed.

Secondary electrospray ionization (SESI) is an spray type, ambient ionization method where charging ions are produced by means of an electrospray. These ions then charge vapor molecules in the gas phase when colliding with them. [53] [54]

In paper spray ionization, the sample is applied to a piece of paper, solvent is added, and a high voltage is applied to the paper, creating ions.

Applications

The outside of the electrospray interface on an LTQ mass spectrometer. Electrospray interface on the LTQ.jpg
The outside of the electrospray interface on an LTQ mass spectrometer.

Electrospray is used to study protein folding. [55] [56] [57]

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

Electrospray ionization is the ion source of choice to couple liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The analysis can be performed online, by feeding the liquid eluting from the LC column directly to an electrospray, or offline, by collecting fractions to be later analyzed in a classical nanoelectrospray-mass spectrometry setup. Among the numerous operating parameters in ESI-MS,for proteins, [58] the electrospray voltage has been identified as an important parameter to consider in ESI LC/MS gradient elution. [59] The effect of various solvent compositions [60] (such as TFA [61] or ammonium acetate, [22] or supercharging reagents, [62] [63] [64] [65] or derivitizing groups [66] ) or spraying conditions [67] on electrospray-LCMS spectra and/or nanoESI-MS spectra. [68] have been studied.

Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS)

Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry was enabled by an ESI interface that was developed and patented by Richard D. Smith and coworkers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, and shown to have broad utility for the analysis of very small biological and chemical compound mixtures, and even extending to a single biological cell.

Noncovalent gas phase interactions

Electrospray ionization is also utilized in studying noncovalent gas phase interactions. The electrospray process is thought to be capable of transferring liquid-phase noncovalent complexes into the gas phase without disrupting the noncovalent interaction. Problems [22] [69] such as non specific interactions [70] have been identified when studying ligand substrate complexes by ESI-MS or nanoESI-MS. An interesting example of this is studying the interactions between enzymes and drugs which are inhibitors of the enzyme. [71] [72] [73] Competition studies between STAT6 and inhibitors [73] [74] [75] have used ESI as a way to screen for potential new drug candidates.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass spectrometry</span> Analytical technique based on determining mass to charge ratio of ions

Mass spectrometry (MS), also called mass spec, is an analytical technique that is used to measure the mass-to-charge ratio of ions. The results are presented as a mass spectrum, a plot of intensity as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio. Mass spectrometry is used in many different fields and is applied to pure samples as well as complex mixtures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ion source</span> Device that creates charged atoms and molecules (ions)

An ion source is a device that creates atomic and molecular ions. Ion sources are used to form ions for mass spectrometers, optical emission spectrometers, particle accelerators, ion implanters and ion engines.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization</span> Ionization technique

In mass spectrometry, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) is an ionization technique that uses a laser energy-absorbing matrix to create ions from large molecules with minimal fragmentation. It has been applied to the analysis of biomolecules and various organic molecules, which tend to be fragile and fragment when ionized by more conventional ionization methods. It is similar in character to electrospray ionization (ESI) in that both techniques are relatively soft ways of obtaining ions of large molecules in the gas phase, though MALDI typically produces far fewer multi-charged ions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electron-capture dissociation</span> Method in mass spectrometry

Electron-capture dissociation (ECD) is a method of fragmenting gas-phase ions for structure elucidation of peptides and proteins in tandem mass spectrometry. It is one of the most widely used techniques for activation and dissociation of mass selected precursor ion in MS/MS. It involves the direct introduction of low-energy electrons to trapped gas-phase ions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry</span> Analytical chemistry technique

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is an analytical chemistry technique that combines the physical separation capabilities of liquid chromatography with the mass analysis capabilities of mass spectrometry (MS). Coupled chromatography – MS systems are popular in chemical analysis because the individual capabilities of each technique are enhanced synergistically. While liquid chromatography separates mixtures with multiple components, mass spectrometry provides spectral information that may help to identify each separated component. MS is not only sensitive, but provides selective detection, relieving the need for complete chromatographic separation. LC–MS is also appropriate for metabolomics because of its good coverage of a wide range of chemicals. This tandem technique can be used to analyze biochemical, organic, and inorganic compounds commonly found in complex samples of environmental and biological origin. Therefore, LC–MS may be applied in a wide range of sectors including biotechnology, environment monitoring, food processing, and pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and cosmetic industries. Since the early 2000s, LC–MS has also begun to be used in clinical applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization</span> Ionization method

Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) is an ionization method used in mass spectrometry which utilizes gas-phase ion-molecule reactions at atmospheric pressure (105 Pa), commonly coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). APCI is a soft ionization method similar to chemical ionization where primary ions are produced on a solvent spray. The main usage of APCI is for polar and relatively less polar thermally stable compounds with molecular weight less than 1500 Da. The application of APCI with HPLC has gained a large popularity in trace analysis detection such as steroids, pesticides and also in pharmacology for drug metabolites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermospray</span>

Thermospray is a soft ionization source by which a solvent flow of liquid sample passes through a very thin heated column to become a spray of fine liquid droplets. As a form of atmospheric pressure ionization in mass spectrometry these droplets are then ionized via a low-current discharge electrode to create a solvent ion plasma. A repeller then directs these charged particles through the skimmer and acceleration region to introduce the aerosolized sample to a mass spectrometer. It is particularly useful in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protein mass spectrometry</span> Application of mass spectrometry

Protein mass spectrometry refers to the application of mass spectrometry to the study of proteins. Mass spectrometry is an important method for the accurate mass determination and characterization of proteins, and a variety of methods and instrumentations have been developed for its many uses. Its applications include the identification of proteins and their post-translational modifications, the elucidation of protein complexes, their subunits and functional interactions, as well as the global measurement of proteins in proteomics. It can also be used to localize proteins to the various organelles, and determine the interactions between different proteins as well as with membrane lipids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desorption electrospray ionization</span>

Desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) is an ambient ionization technique that can be coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) for chemical analysis of samples at atmospheric conditions. Coupled ionization sources-MS systems are popular in chemical analysis because the individual capabilities of various sources combined with different MS systems allow for chemical determinations of samples. DESI employs a fast-moving charged solvent stream, at an angle relative to the sample surface, to extract analytes from the surfaces and propel the secondary ions toward the mass analyzer. This tandem technique can be used to analyze forensics analyses, pharmaceuticals, plant tissues, fruits, intact biological tissues, enzyme-substrate complexes, metabolites and polymers. Therefore, DESI-MS may be applied in a wide variety of sectors including food and drug administration, pharmaceuticals, environmental monitoring, and biotechnology.

Sample preparation for mass spectrometry is used for the optimization of a sample for analysis in a mass spectrometer (MS). Each ionization method has certain factors that must be considered for that method to be successful, such as volume, concentration, sample phase, and composition of the analyte solution. Quite possibly the most important consideration in sample preparation is knowing what phase the sample must be in for analysis to be successful. In some cases the analyte itself must be purified before entering the ion source. In other situations, the matrix, or everything in the solution surrounding the analyte, is the most important factor to consider and adjust. Often, sample preparation itself for mass spectrometry can be avoided by coupling mass spectrometry to a chromatography method, or some other form of separation before entering the mass spectrometer. In some cases, the analyte itself must be adjusted so that analysis is possible, such as in protein mass spectrometry, where usually the protein of interest is cleaved into peptides before analysis, either by in-gel digestion or by proteolysis in solution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laser spray ionization</span>

Laser spray ionization refers to one of several methods for creating ions using a laser interacting with a spray of neutral particles or ablating material to create a plume of charged particles. The ions thus formed can be separated by m/z with mass spectrometry. Laser spray is one of several ion sources that can be coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for the detection of larger molecules.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization</span>

Matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization (MALDESI) was first introduced in 2006 as a novel ambient ionization technique which combines the benefits of electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI). An infrared (IR) or ultraviolet (UV) laser can be utilized in MALDESI to resonantly excite an endogenous or exogenous matrix. The term 'matrix' refers to any molecule that is present in large excess and absorbs the energy of the laser, thus facilitating desorption of analyte molecules. The original MALDESI design was implemented using common organic matrices, similar to those used in MALDI, along with a UV laser. The current MALDESI source employs endogenous water or a thin layer of exogenously deposited ice as the energy-absorbing matrix where O-H symmetric and asymmetric stretching bonds are resonantly excited by a mid-IR laser.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry</span>

Capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry (CE–MS) is an analytical chemistry technique formed by the combination of the liquid separation process of capillary electrophoresis with mass spectrometry. CE–MS combines advantages of both CE and MS to provide high separation efficiency and molecular mass information in a single analysis. It has high resolving power and sensitivity, requires minimal volume and can analyze at high speed. Ions are typically formed by electrospray ionization, but they can also be formed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization or other ionization techniques. It has applications in basic research in proteomics and quantitative analysis of biomolecules as well as in clinical medicine. Since its introduction in 1987, new developments and applications have made CE-MS a powerful separation and identification technique. Use of CE–MS has increased for protein and peptides analysis and other biomolecules. However, the development of online CE–MS is not without challenges. Understanding of CE, the interface setup, ionization technique and mass detection system is important to tackle problems while coupling capillary electrophoresis to mass spectrometry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ambient ionization</span>

Ambient ionization is a form of ionization in which ions are formed in an ion source outside the mass spectrometer without sample preparation or separation. Ions can be formed by extraction into charged electrospray droplets, thermally desorbed and ionized by chemical ionization, or laser desorbed or ablated and post-ionized before they enter the mass spectrometer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laser ablation electrospray ionization</span>

Laser ablation electrospray ionization (LAESI) is an ambient ionization method for mass spectrometry that combines laser ablation from a mid-infrared (mid-IR) laser with a secondary electrospray ionization (ESI) process. The mid-IR laser is used to generate gas phase particles which are then ionized through interactions with charged droplets from the ESI source. LAESI was developed in Professor Akos Vertes lab by Peter Nemes in 2007 and it was marketed commercially by Protea Biosciences, Inc until 2017. Fiber-LAESI for single-cell analysis approach was developed by Bindesh Shrestha in Professor Vertes lab in 2009. LAESI is a novel ionization source for mass spectrometry (MS) that has been used to perform MS imaging of plants, tissues, cell pellets, and even single cells. In addition, LAESI has been used to analyze historic documents and untreated biofluids such as urine and blood. The technique of LAESI is performed at atmospheric pressure and therefore overcomes many of the obstacles of traditional MS techniques, including extensive and invasive sample preparation steps and the use of high vacuum. Because molecules and aerosols are ionized by interacting with an electrospray plume, LAESI's ionization mechanism is similar to SESI and EESI techniques.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extractive electrospray ionization</span>

Extractive electrospray ionization (EESI) is a spray-type, ambient ionization source in mass spectrometry that uses two colliding aerosols, one of which is generated by electrospray. In standard EESI, syringe pumps provide the liquids for both an electrospray and a sample spray. In neutral desorption EESI (ND-EESI), the liquid for the sample aerosol is provided by a flow of nitrogen.

Ion suppression in LC-MS and LC-MS/MS refers to reduced detector response, or signal:noise as a manifested effect of competition for ionisation efficiency in the ionisation source, between the analyte(s) of interest and other endogenous or exogenous species which have not been removed from the sample matrix during sample preparation. Ion suppression is not strictly a problem unless interfering compounds elute at the same time as the analyte of interest. In cases where ion suppressing species do co-elute with an analyte, the effects on the important analytical parameters including precision, accuracy and limit of detection can be extensive, severely limiting the validity of an assay's results.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atmospheric-pressure photoionization</span> Soft ionization method

Atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) is a soft ionization method used in mass spectrometry (MS) usually coupled to liquid chromatography (LC). Molecules are ionized using a vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) light source operating at atmospheric pressure, either by direct absorption followed by electron ejection or through ionization of a dopant molecule that leads to chemical ionization of target molecules. The sample is usually a solvent spray that is vaporized by nebulization and heat. The benefit of APPI is that it ionizes molecules across a broad range of polarity and is particularly useful for ionization of low polarity molecules for which other popular ionization methods such as electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) are less suitable. It is also less prone to ion suppression and matrix effects compared to ESI and APCI and typically has a wide linear dynamic range. The application of APPI with LC/MS is commonly used for analysis of petroleum compounds, pesticides, steroids, and drug metabolites lacking polar functional groups and is being extensively deployed for ambient ionization particularly for explosives detection in security applications.

Peter Nemes is a Hungarian-American chemist, who is active in the fields of bioanalytical chemistry, mass spectrometry, cell/developmental biology, neuroscience, and biochemistry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secondary electrospray ionization</span>

Secondary electro-spray ionization (SESI) is an ambient ionization technique for the analysis of trace concentrations of vapors, where a nano-electrospray produces charging agents that collide with the analyte molecules directly in gas-phase. In the subsequent reaction, the charge is transferred and vapors get ionized, most molecules get protonated and deprotonated. SESI works in combination with mass spectrometry or ion-mobility spectrometry.

References

  1. ↑ Ho, CS; Chan MHM; Cheung RCK; Law LK; Lit LCW; Ng KF; Suen MWM; Tai HL (February 2003). "Electrospray Ionisation Mass Spectrometry: Principles and Clinical Applications". Clin Biochem Rev. 24 (1): 3–12. PMC   1853331 . PMID   18568044.
  2. ↑ Pitt, James J (February 2009). "Principles and Applications of Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Biochemistry". Clin Biochem Rev. 30 (1): 19–34. PMC   2643089 . PMID   19224008.
  3. ↑ Yamashita, Masamichi; Fenn, John B. (September 1984). "Electrospray ion source. Another variation on the free-jet theme". The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 88 (20): 4451–4459. doi:10.1021/j150664a002.
  4. 1 2 Alexandrov, M. L.; Gall, L. N.; Krasnov, N. V.; Nikolaev, V. I.; Pavlenko, V. A.; Shkruov, V. A. (1984). "Extraction of ions from solutions under atmospheric pressure as a method for mass spectrometric analysis of bioorganic compounds". Doklady Akad. SSSR. 277 (3): 379–383. Bibcode:2008RCMS...22..267A. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3113 . PMID   18181250.
  5. ↑ Fenn, J. B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse, C. M. (1989). "Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules". Science . 246 (4926): 64–71. Bibcode:1989Sci...246...64F. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.522.9458 . doi:10.1126/science.2675315. PMID   2675315.
  6. ↑ Markides, K; Gräslund, A. "Advanced information on the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2002" (PDF).
  7. ↑ Rayleigh, L. (1882). "On the Equilibrium of Liquid Conducting Masses charged with Electricity". Philosophical Magazine . 14 (87): 184–186. doi:10.1080/14786448208628425.
  8. ↑ Zeleny, J. (1914). "The electrical discharge from liquid points, and a hydrostatic method of measuring the electric intensity at their surfaces". Physical Review . 3 (2): 69–91. Bibcode:1914PhRv....3...69Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.3.69.
  9. ↑ Wilson, C. T.; G. I Taylor (1925). "The bursting of soap bubbles in a uniform electric field". Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 22 (5): 728. Bibcode:1925PCPS...22..728W. doi:10.1017/S0305004100009609. S2CID   137905700.
  10. ↑ Nolan, J. J. (1926). "Universal scaling laws for the disintegration of electrified drops". Proc. R. Ir. Acad. A. 37: 28.
  11. ↑ Macky, W. A. (October 1, 1931). "Some Investigations on the Deformation and Breaking of Water Drops in Strong Electric Fields". Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 133 (822): 565–587. Bibcode:1931RSPSA.133..565M. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1931.0168 .
  12. ↑ Geoffrey Taylor (1964). "Disintegration of Water Droplets in an Electric Field". Proceedings of the Royal Society A . 280 (1382): 383–397. Bibcode:1964RSPSA.280..383T. doi:10.1098/rspa.1964.0151. JSTOR   2415876. S2CID   15067908.
  13. 1 2 Dole M, Mack LL, Hines RL, Mobley RC, Ferguson LD, Alice MB (1968). "Molecular Beams of Macroions". Journal of Chemical Physics . 49 (5): 2240–2249. Bibcode:1968JChPh..49.2240D. doi:10.1063/1.1670391.
  14. ↑ Birendra N. Pramanik; A.K. Ganguly; Michael L. Gross (28 February 2002). Applied Electrospray Mass Spectrometry: Practical Spectroscopy Series. CRC Press. pp. 4–. ISBN   978-0-8247-4419-9.
  15. ↑ "Press Release: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2002". The Nobel Foundation. 2002-10-09. Retrieved 2011-04-02.
  16. ↑ Gross, Jürgen H. (2017), "Electrospray Ionization", Mass Spectrometry, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 721–778, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-54398-7_12, ISBN   978-3-319-54397-0 , retrieved 2024-03-15
  17. ↑ Pozniak BP, Cole RB (2007). "Current Measurements within the Electrospray Emitter". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 18 (4): 737–748. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2006.11.012. PMID   17257852.
  18. ↑ Olumee; et al. (1998). "Droplet Dynamics Changes in Electrostatic Sprays of Methanol-Water Mixtures". J. Phys. Chem. A. 102 (46): 9154–9160. Bibcode:1998JPCA..102.9154O. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.661.5000 . doi:10.1021/jp982027z.
  19. ↑ Fernández De La Mora J (2007). "The Fluid Dynamics of Taylor Cones". Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 39 (1): 217–243. Bibcode:2007AnRFM..39..217F. doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.39.050905.110159.
  20. ↑ Cole, Richard B (2010). Electrospray and MALDI Mass Spectrometry: Fundamentals, Instrumentation, Practicalities, and Biological Applications (2 ed.). Wiley. p.  4. ISBN   978-0471741077.
  21. ↑ Li KY, Tu H, Ray AK (April 2005). "Charge limits on droplets during evaporation". Langmuir. 21 (9): 3786–94. doi:10.1021/la047973n. PMID   15835938.
  22. 1 2 3 Kebarle P, Verkerk UH (2009). "Electrospray: from ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now". Mass Spectrom Rev. 28 (6): 898–917. Bibcode:2009MSRv...28..898K. doi: 10.1002/mas.20247 . PMID   19551695.
  23. ↑ Iribarne JV, Thomson BA (1976). "On the evaporation of small ions from charged droplets". Journal of Chemical Physics. 64 (6): 2287–2294. Bibcode:1976JChPh..64.2287I. doi:10.1063/1.432536.
  24. 1 2 Nguyen S, Fenn JB (January 2007). "Gas-phase ions of solute species from charged droplets of solutions". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104 (4): 1111–7. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.1111N. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609969104 . PMC   1783130 . PMID   17213314.
  25. ↑ Gamero-Castaño M (2000). "Direct measurement of ion evaporation kinetics from electrified liquid surfaces". J. Chem. Phys. 113 (2): 815. Bibcode:2000JChPh.113..815G. doi:10.1063/1.481857. S2CID   36112510.
  26. ↑ de la Mora Fernandez (2000). "Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole's charged residue mechanism". Analytica Chimica Acta. 406: 93–104. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00601-7. An evaluation of the electric field on the drop surface at the point when it just ceases to be spherical (yet carries the total ion charge z) indicates that small PEG ions may be formed by ion evaporation. The break observed in the charge distribution may perhaps mean that the shift from the Dole to the ion evaporation mechanism arises at m(unintelligible)104[ clarification needed ], though this inference is highly hypothetical.
  27. ↑ de la Mora Fernandez (2000). "Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole's charged residue mechanism". Analytica Chimica Acta. 406: 93–104. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00601-7.
  28. ↑ de la Mora Fernandez (2000). "Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole's charged residue mechanism". Analytica Chimica Acta. 406: 93–104. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00601-7. For most published data examined, zmax is between 65% and 110% of zR, providing strong support in favor of Dole's charged residue mechanism, at least for masses from 3.3 kD up to 1.4 MD. Other large but less compact ions from proteins and linear chains of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) have zmax values considerably larger than zR, apparently implying that they also formas charged residues, though from non-spherical drops held together by the polymer backbone.
  29. ↑ de la Mora Fernandez (2000). "Electrospray ionization of large multiply charged species proceeds via Dole's charged residue mechanism". Analytica Chimica Acta. 406: 93–104. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00601-7. The data do show a nearly discontinuous jump in the observed m/z for a mass somewhere between 20,000 and 50,000, and it is tempting to conclude that this is due to a corresponding transition where the ionization mechanism shifts from one type to the other. This would correspond to a critical value of z in the vicinity of 50, with a corresponding electric field of 2.6 V/nm. Of course, this is entirely hypothetical, and there is yet no compelling evidence of any kind indicating that an ion with as many as 30 charges can be formed by field evaporation.
  30. ↑ Hogan CJ, Carroll JA, Rohrs HW, Biswas P, Gross ML (January 2009). "Combined charged residue-field emission model of macromolecular electrospray ionization". Anal. Chem. 81 (1): 369–77. doi:10.1021/ac8016532. PMC   2613577 . PMID   19117463.
  31. ↑ Konermann, Lars (2013). "Unraveling the Mechanism of Electrospray Ionization". Analytical Chemistry. 85 (1): 2–9. doi:10.1021/ac302789c. PMID   23134552.
  32. ↑ Li, Anyin; Luo, Qingjie; Park, So-Jung; Cooks, R. Graham (2014). "Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions of Nanoparticles formed by Electrospray Ionization of Coinage Metals". Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 53 (12): 3147–3150. doi:10.1002/anie.201309193. ISSN   1433-7851. PMID   24554582.
  33. ↑ Kruve, Anneli; Kaupmees, Karl; Liigand, Jaanus; Leito, Ivo (2014). "Negative Electrospray Ionization via Deprotonation: Predicting the Ionization Efficiency". Analytical Chemistry. 86 (10): 4822–4830. doi:10.1021/ac404066v. PMID   24731109.
  34. ↑ Gale DC, Smith RD (1993). "Small Volume and Low Flow Rate Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry for Aqueous Samples". Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 7 (11): 1017–1021. Bibcode:1993RCMS....7.1017G. doi:10.1002/rcm.1290071111.
  35. ↑ Emmett MR, Caprioli RM (1994). "Micro-electrospray mass spectrometry: ultra-high-sensitivity analysis of peptides and proteins". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5 (7): 605–613. doi:10.1016/1044-0305(94)85001-1. PMID   24221962.
  36. ↑ Wilm MS, Mann M (1994). "Electrospray and Taylor-Cone theory, Dole's beam of macromolecules at last?". Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 136 (2–3): 167–180. Bibcode:1994IJMSI.136..167W. doi:10.1016/0168-1176(94)04024-9.
  37. ↑ Wilm M, Mann M (1996). "Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source". Anal. Chem. 68 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1021/ac9509519. PMID   8779426.
  38. ↑ Gibson; Mugo, Samuel M.; Oleschuk, Richard D.; et al. (2009). "Nanoelectrospray emitters: Trends and perspective". Mass Spectrometry Reviews. 28 (6): 918–936. Bibcode:2009MSRv...28..918G. doi:10.1002/mas.20248. PMID   19479726.
  39. ↑ Page JS, Marginean I, Baker ES, Kelly RT, Tang K, Smith RD (December 2009). "Biases in ion transmission through an electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry capillary inlet". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20 (12): 2265–72. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2009.08.018. PMC   2861838 . PMID   19815425.
  40. 1 2 Schmidt A, Karas M, Dülcks T (May 2003). "Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 14 (5): 492–500. doi:10.1016/S1044-0305(03)00128-4. PMID   12745218.
  41. ↑ Wilm M. S.; Mann M. (1994). "Electrospray and Taylor-Cone Theory, Dole's Beam of Macromolecules at Last?". Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Process. 136 (2–3): 167–180. Bibcode:1994IJMSI.136..167W. doi:10.1016/0168-1176(94)04024-9.
  42. ↑ Fernandez de la Mora J., Loscertales I. G. (2006). "The Current Emitted by Highly Conducting Taylor Cones". J. Fluid Mech. 260: 155–184. Bibcode:1994JFM...260..155D. doi:10.1017/S0022112094003472. S2CID   122935117.
  43. ↑ Pfeifer RJ, Hendricks (1968). "Parametric Studies of Electrohydrodynamic Spraying". AIAA J. 6 (3): 496–502. Bibcode:1968AIAAJ...6..496H. doi:10.2514/3.4525.
  44. ↑ RSC Chemical Methods Ontology, Cold-spray ionisation mass spectrometry
  45. ↑ Page JS, Tang K, Kelly RT, Smith RD (2008). "A subambient pressure ionization with nanoelectrospray (SPIN) source and interface for improved sensitivity in mass spectrometry". Analytical Chemistry. 80 (5): 1800–1805. doi:10.1021/ac702354b. PMC   2516344 . PMID   18237189.
  46. ↑ Karas, M.; Bahr, U.; Dülcks, T. (2000-03-01). "Nano-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: addressing analytical problems beyond routine". Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 366 (6–7): 669–676. doi:10.1007/s002160051561. ISSN   0937-0633. PMID   11225778. S2CID   24730378.
  47. ↑ I. Marginean; J. S. Page; A. V. Tolmachev; K. Tang; R. D. Smith (2010). "Achieving 50% Ionization Efficiency in Subambient Pressure Ionization with Nanoelectrospray". Analytical Chemistry. 82 (22): 9344–9349. doi:10.1021/ac1019123. PMC   2982749 . PMID   21028835.
  48. ↑ Cooks, R. Graham; Ouyang, Zheng; Takats, Zoltan; Wiseman, Justin M. (2006). "Ambient Mass Spectrometry". Science. 311 (5767): 1566–70. Bibcode:2006Sci...311.1566C. doi:10.1126/science.1119426. PMID   16543450. S2CID   98131681.
  49. 1 2 3 Monge, María Eugenia; Harris, Glenn A.; Dwivedi, Prabha; Fernández, Facundo M. (2013). "Mass Spectrometry: Recent Advances in Direct Open Air Surface Sampling/Ionization". Chemical Reviews. 113 (4): 2269–2308. doi:10.1021/cr300309q. ISSN   0009-2665. PMID   23301684.
  50. ↑ Huang, Min-Zong; Yuan, Cheng-Hui; Cheng, Sy-Chyi; Cho, Yi-Tzu; Shiea, Jentaie (2010). "Ambient Ionization Mass Spectrometry". Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry. 3 (1): 43–65. Bibcode:2010ARAC....3...43H. doi:10.1146/annurev.anchem.111808.073702. ISSN   1936-1327. PMID   20636033.
  51. ↑ Z. Takáts; J.M. Wiseman; B. Gologan; R.G. Cooks (2004). "Mass Spectrometry Sampling Under Ambient Conditions with Desorption Electrospray Ionization". Science. 306 (5695): 471–473. Bibcode:2004Sci...306..471T. doi:10.1126/science.1104404. PMID   15486296. S2CID   22994482.
  52. ↑ Takáts Z, Wiseman JM, Cooks RG (2005). "Ambient mass spectrometry using desorption electrospray ionization (DESI): instrumentation, mechanisms and applications in forensics, chemistry, and biology". Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 40 (10): 1261–75. Bibcode:2005JMSp...40.1261T. doi: 10.1002/jms.922 . PMID   16237663.
  53. ↑ Vidal-de-Miguel, G.; Macía, M.; Pinacho, P.; Blanco, J. (2012-10-16). "Low-Sample Flow Secondary Electrospray Ionization: Improving Vapor Ionization Efficiency". Analytical Chemistry. 84 (20): 8475–8479. doi:10.1021/ac3005378. ISSN   0003-2700. PMID   22970991.
  54. ↑ Barrios-Collado, César; Vidal-de-Miguel, Guillermo; Martinez-Lozano Sinues, Pablo (February 2016). "Numerical modeling and experimental validation of a universal secondary electrospray ionization source for mass spectrometric gas analysis in real-time". Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 223: 217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2015.09.073 . hdl: 20.500.11850/105470 .
  55. ↑ Konermann, L; Douglas, DJ (1998). "Equilibrium unfolding of proteins monitored by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: Distinguishing two-state from multi-state transitions". Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 12 (8): 435–442. Bibcode:1998RCMS...12..435K. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19980430)12:8<435::AID-RCM181>3.0.CO;2-F. PMID   9586231.
  56. ↑ Nemes; Goyal, Samita; Vertes, Akos; et al. (2008). "Conformational and Noncovalent Complexation Changes in Proteins during Electrospray Ionization". Analytical Chemistry. 80 (2): 387–395. doi:10.1021/ac0714359. PMID   18081323.
  57. ↑ Sobott; Robinson (2004). "Characterising electrosprayed biomolecules using tandem-MS—the noncovalent GroEL chaperonin assembly". International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 236 (1–3): 25–32. Bibcode:2004IJMSp.236...25S. doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2004.05.010.
  58. ↑ Vaidyanathan S.; Kell D.B.; Goodacre R. (2004). "Selective detection of proteins in mixtures using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: influence of instrumental settings and implications for proteomics". Analytical Chemistry. 76 (17): 5024–5032. doi:10.1021/ac049684+. PMID   15373437.
  59. ↑ Marginean I, Kelly RT, Moore RJ, Prior DC, LaMarche BL, Tang K, Smith RD (April 2009). "Selection of the optimum electrospray voltage for gradient elution LC-MS measurements". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20 (4): 682–8. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2008.12.004. PMC   2692488 . PMID   19196520.
  60. ↑ Iavarone; Jurchen, John C.; Williams, Evan R.; et al. (2000). "Effects of solvent on the maximum charge state and charge state distribution of protein ions produced by electrospray ionization". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11 (11): 976–985. doi:10.1016/S1044-0305(00)00169-0. PMC   1414794 . PMID   11073261.
  61. ↑ Garcia (2005). "The effect of the mobile phase additives on sensitivity in the analysis of peptides and proteins by high-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrometry". Journal of Chromatography B. 825 (2): 111–123. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.03.041. PMID   16213445.
  62. ↑ Teo CA, Donald WA (May 2014). "Solution additives for supercharging proteins beyond the theoretical maximum proton-transfer limit in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry". Anal. Chem. 86 (9): 4455–62. doi:10.1021/ac500304r. PMID   24712886.
  63. ↑ Lomeli SH, Peng IX, Yin S, Loo RR, Loo JA (January 2010). "New reagents for increasing ESI multiple charging of proteins and protein complexes". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21 (1): 127–31. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2009.09.014. PMC   2821426 . PMID   19854660.
  64. ↑ Lomeli SH, Yin S, Ogorzalek Loo RR, Loo JA (April 2009). "Increasing charge while preserving noncovalent protein complexes for ESI-MS". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20 (4): 593–6. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2008.11.013. PMC   2789282 . PMID   19101165.
  65. ↑ Yin S, Loo JA (March 2011). "Top-Down Mass Spectrometry of Supercharged Native Protein-Ligand Complexes". Int J Mass Spectrom. 300 (2–3): 118–122. Bibcode:2011IJMSp.300..118Y. doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2010.06.032. PMC   3076692 . PMID   21499519.
  66. ↑ Krusemark CJ, Frey BL, Belshaw PJ, Smith LM (September 2009). "Modifying the charge state distribution of proteins in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry by chemical derivatization". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20 (9): 1617–25. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2009.04.017. PMC   2776692 . PMID   19481956.
  67. ↑ Nemes P, Goyal S, Vertes A (January 2008). "Conformational and noncovalent complexation changes in proteins during electrospray ionization". Anal. Chem. 80 (2): 387–95. doi:10.1021/ac0714359. PMID   18081323.
  68. ↑ Ramanathan R, Zhong R, Blumenkrantz N, Chowdhury SK, Alton KB (October 2007). "Response normalized liquid chromatography nanospray ionization mass spectrometry". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 18 (10): 1891–9. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2007.07.022. PMID   17766144.
  69. ↑ Gabelica V, Vreuls C, Filée P, Duval V, Joris B, Pauw ED (2002). "Advantages and drawbacks of nanospray for studying noncovalent protein-DNA complexes by mass spectrometry". Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16 (18): 1723–8. Bibcode:2002RCMS...16.1723G. doi:10.1002/rcm.776. hdl: 2268/322 . PMID   12207359.
  70. ↑ Daubenfeld T, Bouin AP, van der Rest G (September 2006). "A deconvolution method for the separation of specific versus nonspecific interactions in noncovalent protein-ligand complexes analyzed by ESI-FT-ICR mass spectrometry". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 17 (9): 1239–48. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2006.05.005. PMID   16793278.
  71. ↑ Rosu F, De Pauw E, Gabelica V (July 2008). "Electrospray mass spectrometry to study drug-nucleic acids interactions". Biochimie. 90 (7): 1074–87. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2008.01.005. PMID   18261993.
  72. ↑ Wortmann A, Jecklin MC, Touboul D, Badertscher M, Zenobi R (May 2008). "Binding constant determination of high-affinity protein-ligand complexes by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and ligand competition". J Mass Spectrom. 43 (5): 600–8. Bibcode:2008JMSp...43..600W. doi:10.1002/jms.1355. PMID   18074334.
  73. 1 2 Jecklin MC, Touboul D, Bovet C, Wortmann A, Zenobi R (March 2008). "Which electrospray-based ionization method best reflects protein-ligand interactions found in solution? a comparison of ESI, nanoESI, and ESSI for the determination of dissociation constants with mass spectrometry". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19 (3): 332–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.007 . hdl: 20.500.11850/9214 . PMID   18083584.
  74. ↑ Touboul D, Maillard L, Grässlin A, Moumne R, Seitz M, Robinson J, Zenobi R (February 2009). "How to deal with weak interactions in noncovalent complexes analyzed by electrospray mass spectrometry: cyclopeptidic inhibitors of the nuclear receptor coactivator 1-STAT6". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20 (2): 303–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.10.008 . hdl: 20.500.11850/15377 . PMID   18996720.
  75. ↑ Czuczy N, Katona M, Takats Z (February 2009). "Selective detection of specific protein-ligand complexes by electrosonic spray-precursor ion scan tandem mass spectrometry". J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20 (2): 227–37. doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2008.09.010. PMID   18976932.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.