Equity (economics)

Last updated
Sustainable development.svgEnvironmentEquitableSustainableBearable (Social ecology)Viable (Environmental economics)EconomicSocial
Scheme of sustainable development:
at the confluence of three constituent parts. (2006)

Equity, or economic equality, is the concept or idea of fairness in economics, particularly in regard to taxation or welfare economics. Equity is a central concept in economics, closely tied to notions of fairness and justice in the distribution of wealth, resources, and taxation within a society. It is a foundational element in the discussions of public finance, taxation policies, and welfare economics, influencing how resources are allocated among different segments of the population.

Contents

Overview

According to Peter Corning, there are three distinct categories of substantive fairness (equality, equity, and reciprocity) that must be combined and balanced in order to achieve a truly fair society. [1] Inequality and inequities have significantly increased in recent decades [2] [ citation needed ]. But while most of middle-income countries increased inequality in recent years, it is important to note that middle classes and—to a lesser extent—poorer-income groups seem to be getting an increasing share of income in recent years. This advance is still vulnerable and needs to be quickly accelerated in the 21st century [3]

Definitions of Equity

Equity in economics refers to a condition of fairness where the economic processes and their outcomes do not unduly favor or disadvantage any particular group or individual. This sense of fairness, or economic justice, attempts to balance economic disparities among different societal segments to promote a more inclusive and just society. Equity is a central issue in public sector economics and in public policy. It is at the heart of almost all economics policy debates [4] , which underscores the integral role that equity plays in shaping public decisions that impact overall societal welfare.

Equity looks at the distribution of capital, goods, and access to services throughout an economy and is often measured using tools such as the Gini index. Equity may be distinguished from economic efficiency in overall evaluation of social welfare. Although 'equity' has broader uses, it may be posed as a counterpart to economic inequality in yielding a "good" distribution of wealth. It has been studied in experimental economics as inequity aversion.

Difficulty in Defining Equity

Defining equity presents inherent challenges due to its subjective nature, which depends heavily on societal values and individual perceptions of what is considered fair. Economists often struggle to establish a universally accepted definition of distributional equity because it involves making interpersonal comparisons of utility, which are inherently complex and controversial. Public finance in theory and practice highlights this difficulty: "Economists find it difficult to formulate an acceptable definition of distributional equity because it would require interpersonal comparisons of utility." [5] In practice, it may prove impossible to equalise choices without seriously impeding social objectives in other areas, such as the attainment of efficiency or the preservation of liberty. [6] This complexity is a significant barrier to forming a consensus on what constitutes equitable outcomes in economic policy.

Horizontal vs. Vertical Equity

The concept of horizontal equity means treating people alike if they are in the same or similar economic situations—making them pay the same taxes and/or providing them with the same public services. Implicit in the notion of horizontal equity is an assumption that people’s capacity to enjoy income is similar, at least within a given range of incomes. [7] This principle underpins many tax systems, advocating that those with comparable incomes should incur similar tax burdens. However, the practical implementation of horizontal equity is fraught with challenges, as defining what constitutes similar economic situations can be highly subjective and complex. Much of the complexity in the federal income tax arises from attempts to define equal economic situations for purposes of horizontal equity. [8]

A second and even more challenging concept of equity is vertical equity. Vertical equity means treating people differently according to the differences in their income, wealth, or other measure of need or ability to pay. [9] It is typically advocating that those who are better off should contribute more to the public coffers. This principle supports progressive taxation, where tax rates escalate with an individual's income or wealth. The rationale for vertical equity involves recognizing different capacities and needs among the population, which should influence their tax contributions. However, like horizontal equity, vertical equity also encounters practical difficulties. For example, one difficulty with using vertical equity as a guide to public policy is in measurement. Attempting to determine vertical equity also raises the serious problems discussed earlier that are associated with interpersonal comparisons of utility. [10]

Equity Axioms

Equity axioms are theoretical constructs that provide frameworks for understanding and implementing fairness in economic policies. While there are many variants of equity principles, they could be divided in two broad categories, namely, procedural and consequentialist. [11]

Among these, Hammond’s equity principle is notable. It suggests that a progressive transfer—redistributing income from richer to poorer individuals without altering their relative positions in terms of utility—enhances overall welfare. This principle is grounded in the belief that "an increase in one person's utility matched with a decrease in another person's utility that does not alter their respective positions on the utility scale – what we refer to as a Hammond progressive transfer – constitutes a welfare improvement.“ [12]

Another axiom is Sen's weak equity axiom, which states: „Let person i have a lower level of welfare than person j for each level of individual income. Then in distributing a given total of income among n individuals including i and j, the optimal solution must give i a higher level of income than j.“ [13] This axiom prioritizes the needs of the most disadvantaged when allocating resources, ensuring that equity considerations directly influence economic outcomes.

Equity in Taxation

The role of equity in taxation is pivotal. An equitable tax system aims to distribute the financial burden fairly across different income groups, ensuring that everyone contributes their fair share towards public services. The principles of horizontal and vertical equity are often discussed regarding taxation.

In public finance, horizontal equity is the idea that people with a similar ability to pay taxes should pay the same or similar amounts. It is related to the concept of tax neutrality or the idea that the tax system should not discriminate between similar things or people, or unduly distort behavior. [14]

Vertical equity usually refers to the idea that people with a greater ability to pay taxes should pay more. If the rich pay more in proportion to their income, this is known as a proportional tax; if they pay an increasing proportion, this is termed a progressive tax , sometimes associated with redistribution of wealth. [15] Progressive tax is one of the main financial tools to help decrease the inequality between income groups.

In addition, Equity may also refer to inter-nation equity. As a theory, inter-nation equity is concerned with the allocation of national gain and loss in the international context and aims to ensure that each country receives an equitable share of tax revenues from cross-border transactions. The tax policy principle of inter-nation equity has been an important consideration in the debate on the division of taxing rights between source and residence countries. [16]

Fair division

Equitability in fair division means every person's subjective valuation of their own share of some goods is the same. The surplus procedure (SP) achieves a more complex variant called proportional equitability. For more than two people, a division cannot always both be equitable and envy-free. [17]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "Is Capitalism Fair? | Psychology Today".
  2. ↑ "Social Justice: Is It in Our Nature (and Our Future)?". American Scientist. 2017-02-06. Retrieved 2023-03-26.
  3. ↑ Ravallion, M. (2009). “The Developing World’s Bulging (but Vulnerable) Middle Class.” Policy Research Working Paper 4816. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
  4. ↑ Ulbrich, H. (2011). Public Finance in Theory and Practice Second edition (1st ed.). Routledge, p. 71
  5. ↑ Ulbrich, H. (2011). Public Finance in Theory and Practice Second edition (1st ed.). Routledge, p. 70
  6. ↑ LE GRAND, J. (1984). Equity as an Economic Objective. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 1(1), 39–51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24353611
  7. ↑ Ulbrich, H. (2011). Public Finance in Theory and Practice Second edition (1st ed.). Routledge, p. 72
  8. ↑ Ulbrich, H. (2011). Public Finance in Theory and Practice Second edition (1st ed.). Routledge, p. 72
  9. ↑ Ulbrich, H. (2011). Public Finance in Theory and Practice Second edition (1st ed.). Routledge, p. 73
  10. ↑ Ulbrich, H. (2011). Public Finance in Theory and Practice Second edition (1st ed.). Routledge, p. 73
  11. ↑ Dubey, Ram Sewak (November 2016). "On construction of social welfare orders satisfying Hammond equity and Weak Pareto axioms". Mathematical Social Sciences. 84: 119–124. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.10.006.
  12. ↑ Nicolas Gravel, Brice Magdalou, Patrick Moyes. Hammond’s Equity Principle and the Measurement of Ordinal Inequalities. 2017. halshs-01430838 https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01430838
  13. ↑ Equality: On Sen's Weak Equity Axiom Author: James Griffin Source: Mind , Apr., 1981, New Series, Vol. 90, No. 358 (Apr., 1981), pp. 280-286 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association https://www.jstor.org/stable/2253344
  14. ↑ Musgrave (1987), pp. 1057–58. Burgers, Irene JJ, and I. J. Valderrama. "Fairness: A dire international tax standard with no meaning". Intertax 45 (2017): 767.
  15. ↑ Musgrave (1959), p. 20.
  16. ↑ OECD (2014), “Fundamental principles of taxation”, in Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264218789-5-en
  17. ↑ Better Ways to Cut a Cake by Steven J. Brams, Michael A. Jones, and Christian Klamler in the Notices of the American Mathematical Society December 2006.

Related Research Articles

A tax is a compulsory financial charge or some other type of levy imposed on a taxpayer by a governmental organization in order to collectively fund government spending, public expenditures, or as a way to regulate and reduce negative externalities. Tax compliance refers to policy actions and individual behaviour aimed at ensuring that taxpayers are paying the right amount of tax at the right time and securing the correct tax allowances and tax relief. The first known taxation took place in Ancient Egypt around 3000–2800 BC. Taxes consist of direct or indirect taxes and may be paid in money or as its labor equivalent.

Pareto efficiency or Pareto optimality is a situation where no action or allocation is available that makes one individual better off without making another worse off. The concept is named after Vilfredo Pareto (1848–1923), Italian civil engineer and economist, who used the concept in his studies of economic efficiency and income distribution. The following three concepts are closely related:

This aims to be a complete article list of economics topics:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conspicuous consumption</span> Concept in sociology and economy

In sociology and in economics, the term conspicuous consumption describes and explains the consumer practice of buying and using goods of a higher quality, price, or in greater quantity than practical. In 1899, the sociologist Thorstein Veblen coined the term conspicuous consumption to explain the spending of money on and the acquiring of luxury commodities specifically as a public display of economic power—the income and the accumulated wealth—of the buyer. To the conspicuous consumer, the public display of discretionary income is an economic means of either attaining or of maintaining a given social status.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public finance</span> Study of the role of government within the economy

Public finance is the study of the role of the government in the economy. It is the branch of economics that assesses the government revenue and government expenditure of the public authorities and the adjustment of one or the other to achieve desirable effects and avoid undesirable ones. The purview of public finance is considered to be threefold, consisting of governmental effects on:

  1. The efficient allocation of available resources;
  2. The distribution of income among citizens; and
  3. The stability of the economy.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive tax</span> Form of tax

A progressive tax is a tax in which the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases. The term progressive refers to the way the tax rate progresses from low to high, with the result that a taxpayer's average tax rate is less than the person's marginal tax rate. The term can be applied to individual taxes or to a tax system as a whole. Progressive taxes are imposed in an attempt to reduce the tax incidence of people with a lower ability to pay, as such taxes shift the incidence increasingly to those with a higher ability-to-pay. The opposite of a progressive tax is a regressive tax, such as a sales tax, where the poor pay a larger proportion of their income compared to the rich

Welfare economics is a field of economics that applies microeconomic techniques to evaluate the overall well-being (welfare) of a society. This evaluation is typically done at the economy-wide level, and attempts to assess the distribution of resources and opportunities among members of society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Mirrlees</span> British Nobel Laureate in Economic Sciences

Sir James Alexander Mirrlees was a British economist and winner of the 1996 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. He was knighted in the 1997 Birthday Honours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tax policy</span> Choice by a government as to what taxes to levy, in what amounts, and on whom

Tax policy refers to the guidelines and principles established by a government for the imposition and collection of taxes. It encompasses both microeconomic and macroeconomic aspects, with the former focusing on issues of fairness and efficiency in tax collection, and the latter focusing on the overall quantity of taxes to be collected and its impact on economic activity. The tax framework of a country is considered a crucial instrument for influencing the country's economy.

Optimal tax theory or the theory of optimal taxation is the study of designing and implementing a tax that maximises a social welfare function subject to economic constraints. The social welfare function used is typically a function of individuals' utilities, most commonly some form of utilitarian function, so the tax system is chosen to maximise the aggregate of individual utilities. Tax revenue is required to fund the provision of public goods and other government services, as well as for redistribution from rich to poor individuals. However, most taxes distort individual behavior, because the activity that is taxed becomes relatively less desirable; for instance, taxes on labour income reduce the incentive to work. The optimization problem involves minimizing the distortions caused by taxation, while achieving desired levels of redistribution and revenue. Some taxes are thought to be less distorting, such as lump-sum taxes and Pigouvian taxes, where the market consumption of a good is inefficient, and a tax brings consumption closer to the efficient level.

Economic justice is a component of social justice and welfare economics. It is a set of moral and ethical principles for building economic institutions, where the ultimate goal is to create an opportunity for each person to establish a sufficient material foundation upon which to have a dignified, productive, and creative life.."

The Robin Hood effect is an economic occurrence where income is redistributed so that economic inequality is reduced. That is a redistribution of economic resources due to which the economically disadvantaged gain at the expense of the economically advantaged. The effect is named after English folkloric figure Robin Hood, said to have stolen from the rich to give to the poor.

Public economics(or economics of the public sector) is the study of government policy through the lens of economic efficiency and equity. Public economics builds on the theory of welfare economics and is ultimately used as a tool to improve social welfare. Welfare can be defined in terms of well-being, prosperity, and overall state of being.

Redistribution of income and wealth is the transfer of income and wealth from some individuals to others through a social mechanism such as taxation, welfare, public services, land reform, monetary policies, confiscation, divorce or tort law. The term typically refers to redistribution on an economy-wide basis rather than between selected individuals.

Serge-Christophe Kolm is a French economist. His work in economics and related social science includes his analyses, concepts and results in Public Economics and Normative Economics focusing on equality, distributive justice, and efficiency of economic measures, and in other fields and problems often applying them.

Several theories of taxation exist in public economics. Governments at all levels need to raise revenue from a variety of sources to finance public-sector expenditures.

The benefit principle is a concept in the theory of taxation from public finance. It bases taxes to pay for public-goods expenditures on a politically-revealed willingness to pay for benefits received. The principle is sometimes likened to the function of prices in allocating private goods. In its use for assessing the efficiency of taxes and appraising fiscal policy, the benefit approach was initially developed by Knut Wicksell (1896) and Erik Lindahl (1919), two economists of the Stockholm School. Wicksell's near-unanimity formulation of the principle was premised on a just income distribution. The approach was extended in the work of Paul Samuelson, Richard Musgrave, and others. It has also been applied to such subjects as tax progressivity, corporation taxes, and taxes on property or wealth. The unanimity-rule aspect of Wicksell's approach in linking taxes and expenditures is cited as a point of departure for the study of constitutional economics in the work of James Buchanan.

Optimal capital income taxation is a subarea of optimal tax theory which studies the design of taxes on capital income such that a given economic criterion like utility is optimized.

The economics concept of a merit good, originated by Richard Musgrave, is a commodity which is judged that an individual or society should have on the basis of some concept of benefit, rather than ability and willingness to pay. The term is, perhaps, less often used presently than it was during the 1960s to 1980s but the concept still motivates many economic actions by governments. Examples include in-kind transfers such as the provision of food stamps to assist nutrition, the delivery of health services to improve quality of life and reduce morbidity, and subsidized housing and education.

This glossary of economics is a list of definitions of terms and concepts used in economics, its sub-disciplines, and related fields.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.