Hatran Aramaic

Last updated
Hatran
Hatrean
Region Hatra
Era100 BCE – 240 CE
Hatran alphabet
Language codes
ISO 639-3 None (mis)
qly
Glottolog hatr1234
Ashurian
Region Upper Mesopotamia
EraDramatically declined as a vernacular language after the 14th century [1]
Hatran alphabet
Language codes
ISO 639-3
Glottolog assy1241
22 Letters of the Ashurian alphabet AshurianAlphabet.png
22 Letters of the Ashurian alphabet

Aramaic of Hatra, Hatran Aramaic or Ashurian designates a Middle Aramaic dialect, that was used in the region of Hatra and Assur in northeastern parts of Mesopotamia (modern Iraq), approximately from the 3rd century BC to the 3rd century CE. [2] [3] Its range extended from the Nineveh Plains in the centre, up to Tur Abdin in the north, Dura-Europos in the west and Tikrit in the south.

Contents

Most of the evidence of the language comes from inscriptions within the cities dating between 100 BC and the mid-3rd century AD, coinciding with Shapur I's destruction of Hatra in 241 AD and Assur in 257 AD. [4] [5] As a result of Hatra being the site with the most attestation, Hatran Aramaic is a more common name. It is attested by inscriptions from various local sites, that were published by Walter Andrae in 1912 and were studied by S. Ronzevalle and P. Jensen. The excavations undertaken by the Iraqi Department of Antiquities brought to light more than 100 new texts, the publication of which was undertaken by F. Safar in the journal Sumer. The first four series were the subject of reviews in the journal Syria. The texts range in date from the 2nd or 3rd century BCE to the destruction of the city c. 240 CE; the earliest dated text provides a date of 98 BCE.

For the most part, these inscriptions are short commemorative graffiti with minimal text. The longest of the engraved inscriptions does not have more than 13 lines. It is therefore difficult to identify more than a few features of the Aramaic dialect of Hatra, which shows overall the greatest affinity to Syriac.

Slab with Aramaic Hatran Inscription from Hatra. Iraq Museum Slab with Aramaic Hatran Inscription from Hatra, Iraq, Iraq Museum.jpg
Slab with Aramaic Hatran Inscription from Hatra. Iraq Museum

The stone inscriptions bear witness to an effort to establish a monumental script. This script is little different from that of the Aramaic inscriptions of Assur (possessing the same triangular š, and the use of the same means to avoid confusion between m, s, and q). The ds and the rs are not distinguished from one another, and it is sometimes difficult not to confuse w and y.

Having conquered the Aramean city-states to the west, the Neo-Assyrian Empire (911–605 BC) adopted Old Aramaic as the official language alongside the Assyrian Akkadian language. With the Achaemenid Empire succeeding them and adopting Old Aramaic, it rose to become the lingua franca of Iran, Mesopotamia and the Levant. [6]

Development

Hatran Aramaic developed through dialectic deviation as well as producing its own script. Various dialects of Aramaic developed around major cities or regions including the sister dialect of Syriac (city of Edessa), Mandaic (region surrounding the head of the Persian Gulf, Nabataean (from the Negev to the east bank of the Jordan River and the Sinai Peninsula), Jewish Babylonian Aramaic (Babylon), Palmyrene (Palmyra) and various Palestinian sub dialects (Palestine). Syriac, Mandaic and Christian Palestinian Aramaic also developed their own variants of the original script which is still employed today by Western Neo-Aramaic speakers as well as members of the Jewish nation for Hebrew who refer to it as ‘Ktāḇ Āšūrī’ (Assyrian writing) since it was the Assyrian monarchs who promulgated it. [7]

Hatran Aramaic and Syriac have been heavily influenced by Akkadian, partly due to the proximity to the heartland as well as the native Assyrians having adopted these two dialects. Many commonly-used nouns such as month names were burrowed from Akkadian as well as being influenced phonologically, morphologically and syntactically. [8]

History

The city of Nisibis came under siege several times during the Roman-Persian Wars. However, in 363 AD the Romans were forced to surrender the city to the Persians and standby as the Christian population was expelled. [9] St Ephrem the Syrian was one of these refugees and ended up settling in Edessa. The city was flourishing with pagans, quite the opposite to his beloved Nisibis which had been a bastion for Syriac-speaking Christians. [10] As Edessa's demographics shifted to a Christian-majority which used Syriac as the language of worship, the language rose to become the new regional lingua franca. Well over 70 important Syriac writers are known from the gold age of Syriac (5th – 9th centuries), stretching from the Levant and the Sinai to the foothills of the Zagros Mountains and Qatar. [11] Combined with the devastation of the cities of Assur and Hatra, Syriac replaced the language of the locals and remained as a major language until its decline following the Mongol invasions and conquests and rise of the Neo-Aramaic languages.

Evidence and attestation

With Hatra enjoying great prosperity during the life of the language, the city has by far the most inscriptions with the city of Assur also containing numerous inscriptions. The rest of the evidence is spread sparsely throughout Dura-Europos, Gaddāla, Tikrit, Qabr Abu Naif, Abrat al-Sagira and Sa'adiya. [12] The surviving corpus which has been published, transliterated and translated consists of commemorative and votive inscriptions, similar to those found in Edessa, Palmyra and among the Nabataean inscriptions. This method usually includes the date of completion of the writing, place, person who commissioned the inscription or statue as well as the scribe's own details on some occasions. Unlike the Neo-Assyrian, Neo-Babylonian and the Syriac scribes of the Sasanian realm, the regal year is not included. [13] Both Assyro-Babylonian and Arabian gods are mentioned in the inscriptions including Ashur, Allat, Bel, Gad (Tyche), Nabu, Nasr, (Apollo), Shamash and Sin. ܽWhile both cities also attest the personal names of affluent citizens, the Hatran rulers with distinctly Parthian names are attested only in Hatra. [14]

Ashurian TransliterationEnglish TranslationSyriac Equivalent
'AssurḥēlAshur is powerfulܐܠܗܐ ܚܝܠܬܢܐ
'AssurḥannīAshur took pity on meܐܬܪܚܡ ܐܠܗܐ ܥܠܝ
'AssurəmarAshur has declaredܐܡܪ ܐܠܗܐ
'AssurnṯanAshur has given (compare with Esarhaddon)ܢܬܠ ܐܠܗܐ
'Assur'qabAshur has replaced (a son)ܥܩܒ ܐܠܗܐ
'Assuršma'Ashur has heard (our prayer/supplication)ܫܡܥ ܐܠܗܐ
'AssurtāreṣAshur set (it) rightܬܪܨ ܐܠܗܐ
'Ap̄rahāṭ Aphrahat (or sage)ܐܦܪܗܛ ܐܘ ܚܟܝܡܐ
Bēṯ(ə)lāhyhaḇThe house of God has given (a son)ܒܝܬ ܐܠܗܐ ܝܗܒ
Bar NērgālSon of Nergalܒܪ ܪܓܠ
Bar NešrāSon of Nasr (the eagle)ܒܪ ܢܫܪܐ
MāranyhaḇOur lord has given (a son)ܝܗܒ ܡܪܢ
MāryāThe lord (used as a term for the Hatran rulers before using the title king; used by Syriac-speaking Christians to refer to God)ܡܪܝܐ
MlāḇēlBel has filledܡܠܐ ܒܝܠ
NḇūḇnāNabu has built (a son)ܒܢܐ ܢܒܘ
NḇūḡabbārNabu is mightyܢܒܘ ܓܢܒܪܐ
NḇūdayyānNabu is the judgeܢܒܘ ܕܝܢܐ
NērgāldammarNergal is wondrousܢܪܓܠ ܕܘܡܪܐ
NešrānṯanNasr has given (a son)ܢܬܠ ܢܫܪܐ
Sanaṭrūq Sanatruq I and Sanatruq II ܣܢܛܪܘܩ
SlōkhSeleucusܣܠܘܟ
Walagaš Vologash ܘܠܓܫ

Grammatical sketch

Orthography

The dialect of Hatra is no more consistent than that of Palmyra in its use of matres lectiones to indicate the long vowels ō and ī; the pronominal suffix of the 3rd person plural is written indiscriminately, and in the same inscription one finds hwn and hn, the quantifier kwl and kl "all", the relative pronoun dy and d, and the word byš and "evil".

Phonology

The following features are attested:

Lenition

A weakening of ‘ayn; in one inscription, the masculine singular demonstrative adjective is written ‘dyn (‘dyn ktb’ "this inscription") which corresponds to Mandaic and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic hādēn. Similar demonstratives, ‘adī and ‘adā, are attested in Jewish Babylonian Aramaic.

Dissimilation

  • The surname ’kṣr’ "the court" (qṣr) and the proper name kṣy’, which resembles Nabataean qṣyw and the Safaitic qṣyt, demonstrate a regressive dissimilation of emphasis, examples of which are found already in Old Aramaic, rather than a loss of the emphasis of q, which is found in Mandaic and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic.
  • Dissimilation of geminate consonants through n-insertion: the adjective šappīr "beautiful" is regularly written šnpyr; likewise, the divine name gadd "Tyché" is once written gd, but more commonly appears as gnd. This is a common phenomenon in Aramaic; Carl Brockelmann, however, claims that it is a characteristic feature of the northern dialect to which Armenian owes its Aramaic loans.

Vocalism

The divine name Nergal, written nrgl, appears in three inscriptions. The pronunciation nergōl is also attested in the Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin, 63b) where it rhymes with tarnəgōl, "cock."

Syntactic phonology

The Hatran b-yld corresponds to the Syriac bēt yaldā "anniversary". The apocope of the final consonant of the substantive bt in the construct state is not attested in either Old Aramaic or Syriac; it is, however, attested in other dialects such as Jewish Babylonian Aramaic and Jewish Palestinian Aramaic.

Morphology

Verbal morphology

  • The perfect: The first person singular of the perfect appears only in one inscription: ’n’ ... ktbyt "I ... wrote"; this is the regular vocalization elsewhere among those Aramaic dialects in which it is attested.
  • The causative perfect of qm "demand" should be vocalized ’ēqīm, which is evident from the written forms ’yqym (which appears beside ’qym), the feminine ’yqymt, and the third person plural, ’yqmw. This detail distinguishes Hatran as well as Syriac and Mandaic from the western Jewish and Christian dialects. The vocalization of the preformative poses the same problem as the Hebrew hēqīm.
  • The imperfect: The third person of the masculine singular is well attested; it consistently has the preformative l-.
  1. In the jussive: lṭb bꜥšym "that Bacl Šemēn may announce it" (Syriac ’aṭeb(b)), l’ ldbrhn ... bqṭyr’ "that he not oppress them" (Syriac dəbar baqəṭīrā "to oppress," lit. "to carry away with force").
  2. In the indicative: mn dy lšḥqh "whoever strikes him" (Syriac šəḥaq), mn dy lqrhy wl’ ldkrhy "whoever reads it and does not make mention of it", mn dlꜥwl mhk’ bmšn "whoever goes from here to Mesene", kwl mn dlcbwr ... wlktwb lꜥlyh "whoever passes ... and writes over".
  3. The preformative l- is employed identically in the Aramaic of Assur. The dialect of Hatra is thus further distinguished from Syriac (which uses an n- preformative) and also from Jewish Babylonian Aramaic, in which the use of the l- preformative for the indicative is not consistent.

Nominal morphology

The distinction between the three states is apparent. As in Syriac, the masculine plural form of the emphatic state has the inflection , written -’. The confusion of this form with that of the construct state may explain the constructions bn’ šmšbrk "sons of Š." and bn’ ddhwn "their cousins." The absolute state is scarcely used: klbn "dogs" and dkyrn "(that they may be) remembered."

Numbers

The ancient Semitic construction, according to which the counted noun, in the plural, is preceded by a numeral in the construct state, with an inversion of genders, is attested by one inscription: tltt klbn "three dogs." This same construction has been discovered in Nabataean: tltt qysrym "the three Caesars."

Syntax

As in Syriac, the analytical construction of the noun complement is common. The use of the construct state appears to be limited to kinship terms and some adjectives: bryk’ ꜥh’. In the analytical construction, the definite noun is either in the emphatic state followed by d(y) (e.g. ṣlm’ dy ... "statue of ...", spr’ dy brmryn’ "the scribe of (the god) Barmarēn") or is marked by the anticipatory pronominal suffix (e.g. qnh dy rꜥ’ "creator of the earth," ꜥl ḥyyhy d ... ’ḥyhy "for the life of his brother," ꜥl zmth dy mn dy ... "against the hair (Syriac zemtā) of whomever ..."). The complement of the object of the verb is also rendered analytically: ...l’ ldkrhy lnšr qb "do not make mention of N.", mn dy lqrhy lꜥdyn ktb’ "whoever reads this inscription."

Likewise, the particle d(y) can have a simple declarative meaning: ...l’ lmr dy dkyr lṭb "(a curse against whomever) does not say, 'may he be well remembered'" which can be compared with l’ lmr dy dkyr.

Vocabulary

Practically all of the known Hatran words are found in Syriac, including words of Akkadian origin, such as ’rdkl’ "architect" (Syriac ’ardiklā), and Parthian professional nouns such as pšgryb’ / pzgryb’ "inheritor of the throne" (Syriac pṣgryb’); three new nouns, which appear to denote some religious functions, are presumably of Iranian origin: hdrpṭ’ (which Safar compares with the Zoroastrian Middle Persian hylpt’hērbed "teacher-priest"), and the enigmatic terms brpdmrk’ and qwtgd/ry’.

Alphabet

Hatran script
Hatran Aramaic script
Hatran inscription at the Shrine of Hatra.jpg
Script type
Time period
c.98 BCE — c.257 AD
Related scripts
Parent systems
ISO 15924
ISO 15924 Hatr(127),Hatran
Unicode
Unicode alias
Hatran
U+108E0–U+108FF
Final Accepted Script Proposal

The Hatran alphabet is the script used to write Aramaic of Hatra, a dialect that was spoken from approximately 98/97 BC (year 409 of the Seleucid calendar) to 240 AD by early inhabitants of present-day northern Iraq. Many inscriptions of this alphabet could be found at Hatra, an ancient city in northern Iraq built by the Seleucid Empire and also used by the Parthian Empire, but subsequently destroyed by the Sassanid Empire in 241 AD. Assur also has several inscriptions which came to an end following its destruction by the Sasanians in 257 AD while the rest of the inscriptions are spread sparsely throughout Dura-Europos, Gaddala, Tur Abdin, Tikrit, Sa'adiya and Qabr Abu Naif. [15] Many of the contemporary ruins were destroyed by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in early 2015. It was encoded in the Unicode Standard 8.0 with support from UC Berkeley's Script Encoding Initiative.

The script is written from right to left, as is typical of Aramaic scripts and of most abjads. Numerals are also written from right to left (bigger place value on the right), and there are two known punctuation marks as well. Some common ligatures also exist, and they do not appear to be necessary, and are rather just a shorthand form of writing. Some 600 texts are known to exist. [16]

The Ashurian alphabet consists of the following letters. Ligatures have been used in certain inscriptions, although it appears to be optional. [17]

NameLetterSound ValueNumerical
Value
Syriac
Equivalent
Phoenician
Equivalent
Hebrew
Equivalent
Arabic
Equivalent
Inscription FormTransliteration IPA
ʾĀlap̄ * Ashurian Alap.png ʾ or nothing[ ʔ ]
or silent
1 Syriac Estrangela alap.svg Phoenician aleph.svg אا
Bēṯ Ashurian Beth.png hard: b
soft: (also bh, v, β)
hard: [ b ]
soft: [ v ] or [ w ]
2 Syriac Estrangela bet.svg Phoenician beth.svg בب
Gāmal Ashurian Gamal.png hard: g
soft: (also , gh, ġ, γ)
hard: [ ɡ ]
soft: [ ɣ ]
3 Syriac Estrangela gamal.svg Phoenician gimel.svg גج
Dālaṯ * Ashurian Dalath.png hard: d
soft: (also dh, ð, δ)
hard: [ d ]
soft: [ ð ]
4 Syriac Estrangela dalat.svg Phoenician daleth.svg דد, ذ
* Ashurian He.png h[ h ]5 Syriac Estrangela he.svg Phoenician he.svg הه
Waw *

Ashurian Waw.png

consonant: w
mater lectionis: ū or ō
(also u or o)
consonant: [ w ]
mater lectionis: [ u ] or [ o ]
6 Syriac Estrangela waw.svg Phoenician waw.svg וو
Zayn * Ashurian Zayn.png z[ z ]7 Syriac Estrangela zayn.svg Phoenician zayin.svg זز
Ḥēṯ Ashurian Heth.png [ ħ ], [ x ], or [ χ ]8 Syriac Estrangela het.svg Phoenician heth.svg חح, خ
Ṭēṯ Ashurian Teth.png [ ]9 Syriac Estrangela tet.svg Phoenician teth.svg טط, ظ
Yōḏ Ashurian Yodh.png consonant: y
mater lectionis: ī (also i)
consonant: [ j ]
mater lectionis: [ i ] or [ e ]
10 Syriac Estrangela yod.svg Phoenician yodh.svg יي
Kāp̄ Ashurian Kap.png hard: k
soft: (also kh, x)
hard: [ k ]
soft: [ x ]
20 Syriac Estrangela kap.svg Phoenician kaph.svg כ ךك
Lāmaḏ Ashurian Lamadh.png l[ l ]30 Syriac Estrangela lamad.svg Phoenician lamedh.svg לل
Mīm Ashurian Meme.png m[ m ]40 Syriac Estrangela mim.svg Phoenician mem.svg מ םم
Nūn Ashurian Nun.png n[ n ]50 Syriac Estrangela nun.svg Phoenician nun.svg נ ןن
Semkaṯ Ashurian Simkath.png s[ s ]60 Syriac Estrangela semkat.svg Phoenician samekh.svg ס
ʿĒ Ashurian Ayn.png ʿ[ ʕ ]70 Syriac Estrangela 'e.svg Phoenician ayin.svg עع, غ
Ashurian Pe.png hard: p
soft: (also , , ph, f)
hard: [ p ]
soft: [ f ]
80 Syriac Estrangela pe.svg Phoenician pe.svg פ ףف
Ṣāḏē * Ashurian Sade.png [ ]90 Syriac Estrangela sade.svg Phoenician sade.svg צ ץص, ض
Qōp̄ Ashurian Qop.png q[ q ]100 Syriac Estrangela qop.svg Phoenician qoph.svg קق
Rēš * Ashurian Resh.png r[ r ]200 Syriac Estrangela res.svg Phoenician res.svg רر
Šīn Ashurian Shin.png š (also sh)[ ʃ ]300 Syriac Estrangela sin.svg Phoenician sin.svg שس, ش
Taw * Ashurian Taw.png hard: t
soft: (also th, θ)
hard: [ t ]
soft: [ θ ]
400 Syriac Estrangela taw.svg Phoenician taw.svg תت, ث

Unicode

Hatran/Ashurian script was added to the Unicode Standard in June, 2015 with the release of version 8.0.

The Unicode block for Hatran/Ashurian is U+108E0–U+108FF:

Hatran [1] [2]
Official Unicode Consortium code chart (PDF)
 0123456789ABCDEF
U+108Ex𐣠𐣡𐣢𐣣𐣤𐣥𐣦𐣧𐣨𐣩𐣪𐣫𐣬𐣭𐣮𐣯
U+108Fx𐣰𐣱𐣲𐣴𐣵𐣻𐣼𐣽𐣾𐣿
Notes
1. ^ As of Unicode version 15.1
2. ^ Grey areas indicate non-assigned code points

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aramaic alphabet</span> Script used to write the Aramaic language

The ancient Aramaic alphabet was used to write the Aramaic languages spoken by ancient Aramean pre-Christian tribes throughout the Fertile Crescent. It was also adopted by other peoples as their own alphabet when empires and their subjects underwent linguistic Aramaization during a language shift for governing purposes — a precursor to Arabization centuries later — including among the Assyrians and Babylonians who permanently replaced their Akkadian language and its cuneiform script with Aramaic and its script, and among Jews, who adopted the Aramaic language as their vernacular and started using the Aramaic alphabet even for writing Hebrew, displacing the former Paleo-Hebrew alphabet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assyria</span> Major Mesopotamian civilization

Assyria was a major ancient Mesopotamian civilization which existed as a city-state from the 21st century BC to the 14th century BC, then to a territorial state, and eventually an empire from the 14th century BC to the 7th century BC.

Aramaic is a Northwest Semitic language that originated in the ancient region of Syria and quickly spread to Mesopotamia, the southern Levant, southeastern Anatolia, Eastern Arabia and Sinai Peninsula, where it has been continually written and spoken in different varieties for over three thousand years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Semitic languages</span> Branch of the Afroasiatic languages

The Semitic languages are a branch of the Afroasiatic language family. They include Arabic, Amharic, Aramaic, Hebrew, and numerous other ancient and modern languages. They are spoken by more than 330 million people across much of West Asia, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, Malta, and in large immigrant and expatriate communities in North America, Europe, and Australasia. The terminology was first used in the 1780s by members of the Göttingen school of history, who derived the name from Shem, one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Akkadian language</span> Extinct Semitic language of Mesopotamia

Akkadian is an extinct East Semitic language that was spoken in ancient Mesopotamia from the third millennium BC until its gradual replacement in common use by Old Aramaic among Assyrians and Babylonians from the 8th century BC.

The Syriac language, also known as AramaicLanguage, Syriac Aramaic and Classical Syriac ܠܫܢܐ ܥܬܝܩܐ, is an Aramaic language. The terms “Syriac” and, when used in ancient context, “Syrian”, are translations of Assyrian. The language is a dialect that emerged during the first century AD from a local Aramaic dialect that was spoken in the ancient region of Osroene, centered in the city of Edessa. During the Early Christian period, it became the main literary language of various Aramaic-speaking Christian communities in the historical region of Ancient Syria and throughout the Near East. As a liturgical language of Syriac Christianity, it gained a prominent role among Eastern Christian communities that used both Eastern Syriac and Western Syriac rites. Following the spread of Syriac Christianity, it also became a liturgical language of eastern Christian communities as far as India and China. It flourished from the 4th to the 8th century, and continued to have an important role during the next centuries, but by the end of the Middle Ages it was gradually reduced to liturgical use, since the role of vernacular language among its native speakers was overtaken by several emerging Neo-Aramaic dialects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hatra</span> Archaeological site in Iraq

Hatra was an ancient city in Upper Mesopotamia located in present-day eastern Nineveh Governorate in northern Iraq. The ruins of the city lie 290 km (180 mi) northwest of Baghdad and 110 km (68 mi) southwest of Mosul. It is considered the richest archaeological site from the Parthian Empire known to date.

The Arameans, or Aramaeans, were an ancient Semitic-speaking people in the Near East that was first recorded in historical sources from the late 12th century BC. The Aramean homeland, sometimes known as the land of Aram, encompassed central regions of modern Syria.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assur</span> Former Assyrian capital, now archaeological site in Iraq

Aššur (; Sumerian: 𒀭𒊹𒆠 AN.ŠAR2KI, Assyrian cuneiform: Aš-šurKI, "City of God Aššur"; Syriac: ܐܫܘܪ Āšūr; Old Persian: 𐎠𐎰𐎢𐎼 Aθur, Persian: آشور Āšūr; Hebrew: אַשּׁוּר ʾAššūr, Arabic: اشور), also known as Ashur and Qal'at Sherqat, was the capital of the Old Assyrian city-state (2025–1364 BC), the Middle Assyrian Empire (1363–912 BC), and for a time, of the Neo-Assyrian Empire (911–609 BC). The remains of the city lie on the western bank of the Tigris River, north of the confluence with its tributary, the Little Zab, in what is now Iraq, more precisely in the al-Shirqat District of the Saladin Governorate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aram (region)</span> Historical region in the Levant mentioned in the Bible

Aram was a historical region mentioned in early cuneiforms and in the Bible, populated by Arameans. The area did not develop into a larger empire but consisted of a number of small states in present-day Syria and northern Israel. Some of the states are mentioned in the Old Testament, Damascus being the most outstanding one, which came to encompass most of Syria. Furthermore, Aram-Damascus is commonly referred to as simply Aram in the Old Testament.

Suret, also known as Assyrian refers to the varieties of Northeastern Neo-Aramaic (NENA) spoken by Christians, namely Assyrians. The various NENA dialects descend from Old Aramaic, the lingua franca in the later phase of the Assyrian Empire, which slowly displaced the East Semitic Akkadian language beginning around the 10th century BC. They have been further heavily influenced by Classical Syriac, the Middle Aramaic dialect of Edessa, after its adoption as an official liturgical language of the Syriac churches, but Suret is not a direct descendant of Classical Syriac.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nabataean Aramaic</span> Variety of Aramaic

Nabataean Aramaic is the extinct Aramaic variety used in inscriptions by the Nabataeans of the East Bank of the Jordan River, the Negev, and the Sinai Peninsula. Compared with other varieties of Aramaic, it is notable for the occurrence of a number of loanwords and grammatical borrowings from Arabic or other North Arabian languages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asoristan</span> Sasanian province in Assyria and Babylonia (226–637 CE)

Asoristan was the name of the Sasanian province of Assyria and Babylonia from 226 to 637.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Imperial Aramaic</span> Ancient language

Imperial Aramaic is a linguistic term, coined by modern scholars in order to designate a specific historical variety of Aramaic language. The term is polysemic, with two distinctive meanings, wider (sociolinguistic) and narrower (dialectological). Since most surviving examples of the language have been found in Egypt, the language is also referred to as Egyptian Aramaic.

Old Aramaic refers to the earliest stage of the Aramaic language, known from the Aramaic inscriptions discovered since the 19th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Assyrian continuity</span> Continuity between ancient and modern Assyrians

Assyrian continuity is the study of continuity between the modern Assyrian people, a Semitic indigenous ethnic, religious and linguistic minority in the Middle East, and the people of Ancient Mesopotamia in general and ancient Assyria in particular. Assyrian continuity and Mesopotamian heritage is a key part of the identity of the modern Assyrian people. No archaeological, genetic, linguistic, anthropological or written historical evidence exists of the original Assyrian and Mesopotamian population being exterminated, removed, bred out or replaced in the aftermath of the fall of the Assyrian Empire, modern contemporary scholarship "almost unilaterally" supports Assyrian continuity, recognizing the modern Assyrians as the ethnic, linguistic, historical and genetic descendants of the East Assyrian-speaking population of Bronze Age and Iron Age Assyria specifically, and Mesopotamia in general, which were composed of both the old native Assyrian population and of neighbouring settlers in the Assyrian heartland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples</span> Residents of the ancient Near East until the end of antiquity

Ancient Semitic-speaking peoples or Proto-Semitic people were speakers of Semitic languages who lived throughout the ancient Near East and North Africa, including the Levant, Mesopotamia, the Arabian Peninsula and Carthage from the 3rd millennium BC until the end of antiquity, with some, such as Arabs, Arameans, Assyrians, Jews, Mandaeans, and Samaritans having a continuum into the present day.

Šerua was a Mesopotamian goddess closely associated with the Assyrian head god Ashur. It is uncertain in which way they were related to each other.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rʻuth-Assor</span> 2nd century AD Assyrian ruler

Rʻuth-Assor, also transliterated Rʻuṯassor, Rʻūṯ’assor or Rʻūṯassor, was a local Assyrian king or city-lord in the early 2nd century AD, ruling the city of Assur under the suzerainty of the Parthian Empire. The continued veneration of Ashur and other Assyrian gods under Rʻuth-Assor and his predecessors and successors, as well as their stelae greatly resembling those erected under by the old kings of the Neo-Assyrian Empire, suggests that Rʻuth-Assor and the other rulers of Assur during this time saw themselves as the continuation of the ancient line of Assyrian kings.

The post-imperial period was the final stage of ancient Assyrian history, covering the history of the Assyrian heartland from the fall of the Neo-Assyrian Empire in 609 BC to the final sack and destruction of Assur, Assyria's ancient religious capital, by the Sasanian Empire c. AD 240–250, though Assyria was to endure as the geopolitical entity of Asoristan until the mid 7th century AD. There was no single independent Assyrian state during this time, with Assur and other Assyrian cities instead falling under the control of the successive Median, Neo-Babylonian, Achaemenid, Seleucid and Parthian empires. The period was marked by the continuance of ancient Assyrian culture, traditions and religion, despite the lack of an Assyrian kingdom. The ancient Assyrian dialect of the Akkadian language went extinct however, completely replaced by Aramaic by the 5th century BC, a process that had begun during the Neo-Assyrian Empire.

References

  1. Micheau 2006, pp. 391.
  2. Beyer 1986, p. 32.
  3. Gzella 2015, p. 273.
  4. Beyer 1998 , p. 155
  5. Geoff Hann (2015). Iraq: The ancient sites and Iraqi Kurdistan. p. 246. ISBN   9781841624884.
  6. M. Folmer (2015). The Aramaic Language in the Achaemenid Period: A Study in Linguistic Variation. p. 6. ISBN   978-9068317404.
  7. "Aramaic language". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  8. Stephen Kaufman (1974). The Akkadian influences on Aramaic (PDF).
  9. "St Ephraem". New Advent.
  10. MSusan Myers (2010). Spirit Epicleses in the Acts of Thomas. p. 38. ISBN   9783161494727.
  11. "Origins of Syriac". Beth Mardutho. Archived from the original on 2018-06-28. Retrieved 2016-06-03.
  12. Beyer 1998 , p. 155
  13. Sebastian P. Brock (2015). Fashion in early Syriac colophons. Archived from the original on 2016-04-05. Retrieved 2016-06-04.
  14. Beyer 1998 , pp. 155–185
  15. Beyer 1998 , p. 155
  16. Everson, Michael (September 24, 2012). "N4324: Preliminary proposal for encoding the Hatran script in the SMP of the UCS" (PDF). International Organization for Standardization . Retrieved 20 August 2016.
  17. Everson, Michael (September 24, 2012). "Preliminary proposal for encoding the Hatran script in the SMP of the UCS" (PDF). International Organization for Standardization . Retrieved 30 May 2016.

Sources