Heliconius erato

Last updated

Red postman
RedPostman.jpg
H. e. petiverana, dorsal view
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Lepidoptera
Family: Nymphalidae
Genus: Heliconius
Species:
H. erato
Binomial name
Heliconius erato
Subspecies

Many, see text

Synonyms
  • Papilio erato
H. e. petiverana in flight, Guatemala Red postman (Heliconius erato petiverana) in flight Guatemala.jpg
H. e. petiverana in flight, Guatemala

Heliconius erato, or the red postman, is one of about 40 neotropical species of butterfly belonging to the genus Heliconius . It is also commonly known as the small postman, the red passion flower butterfly, or the crimson-patched longwing. It was described by Carl Linnaeus in his 1758 10th edition of Systema Naturae. [1]

Contents

H. erato exhibits Müllerian mimicry with other Heliconius butterflies such as Heliconius melpomene in order to warn common predators against attacking, which contributes to its surprising longevity. [2] [3] It also has a unique mating ritual involving the transfer of anti-aphrodisiacs from males to females. [4]

Recent field work has confirmed the relative abundance of this butterfly. [5]

Habitat and home range

H. erato is a neotropical species, found from southern Texas to northern Argentina and Paraguay, and resides on the edges of tropical rainforests. [6] [7] It is philopatric, having a particularly restricted home range. [8] In areas of dense population in Trinidad, some home ranges are only separated by 30 yards, but H. erato rarely travels to neighboring home ranges. [9] [6]

Food resources

H. erato collecting pollen from Lantana camara Flickr - Dario Sanches - Heliconius.erato.840025209.jpg
H. erato collecting pollen from Lantana camara

Caterpillars

Larvae feed on the host plant, first consuming the terminal bud. After they have exhausted the resources of the plant they have hatched on, later instars may move to another plant. [7]

Adults

H. erato is a pollen-feeding species, collecting from the Lantana camara flower. They do not spend much time or energy collecting nectar (only remaining for a few seconds). Instead, they collect pollen in a mass on the ventral side of their proboscis. They then agitate the pollen by coiling and uncoiling their proboscis in order to release its nutrients. H. erato is then able to extract nitrogenous compounds in a clear liquid, including amino acids like arginine, leucine, lysine, valine, proline, histidine, isoleucine, methionine, phenylalanine, threonine, and tryptophan. Females typically carry larger loads of pollen than males as females require more amino acids for egg production. [2]

Co-evolution between Heliconius erato and host plants

Previous studies have shown that host plants, such as Passiflora , have coevolved with Heliconius butterflies. Passiflora plants are usually found in low densities with even less plants in fruiting or flower conditions due to caterpillar feeding. [10] To increase chances of survival and cross-pollination, Passiflora plants synthesize toxins in leaves to deter Heliconius. Passiflora species produce different toxins, leading to different preferences for oviposition among Heliconius species. This leads to a lower chance of herbivore damage for individual Passiflora species and thus helps protect Passiflora plants. Chemical composition of toxins in such plants have not been studied widely. Studies have identified cyanogenic glycosides and alkaloids as potential chemicals that drive distasteful reactions among Heliconius. [11] [12] Toxin variation among Passiflora is one of the reasons for host specificity among Heliconius butterflies.  

Studies have shown that H. erato species that feed on specific Passiflora species tend to spend more time on the host plant and are thus exposed to the toxins for a longer period. [12] [13] Accumulation of toxins such as cyanogenic glycosides leads to a low survival rate among H. erato larvae. Increasing exposure to parasitoids due to longer time spent on the host plant also contributes to the high mortality rate. One recent study showed that mortality increased among H. erato larvae which fed on cyanide-releasing Passiflora. Survived butterflies were capable of excreting higher levels of cyanides, suggesting a defense mechanism in H. erato. [14] H. erato species with more mechanisms to detoxify and secrete ingested toxins are the result of genetic differences among H. erato subspecies. [13]  Toxin excretion, from previous studies, results in changes in wing pattern and body size. Consequences include decreased fecundity, egg size, and survival rate. [15] [16]

Nectar excretion from Passiflora has also been studied as one factor which contributes to coevolution. Passiflora nectar is known to produce aggressive behaviors among ants, wasps, and egg parasitoids. Ehrlich and Gilbert have estimated that parasitoids are capable of destroying most Heliconius eggs under nectar influence. [17] Therefore, host plants such as Passiflora are believed to have self-defense mechanisms that utilize predators against Heliconius butterflies. [10]

Parental care

Female ovipositing Heliconius erato ovipositing.jpg
Female ovipositing

Oviposition

H. erato subspecies have innate, localized host plant preferences for oviposition. These predilections do not vary based on one's own larval host plant or with experimental conditioning. Adult females have been observed to oviposit on the meristem of their host species. Individual plant choice is based on internode length, terminal bud presence, shoot size, and leaf area, in order to confer greater larval survival advantage. In H. erato phyllis, plant choice is contingent upon terminal bud presence and condition. However, selection by quality generally depends on host plant abundance and availability. [7]

Host plants

Host plants include a wide variety of passion flower ( Passiflora ) vines, including:

Social behavior

The red postman returns to a communal roost every night that contains members of the same species and of other heliconids. [6] The roost is typically situated about 2–10 meters from the ground on twigs and tendrils and is occupied by a small group of butterflies. [8] Adults who have just emerged from the pupa typically roost alone for a few days before roosting with others. [6]

Life history

Life cycle

The red postman has been observed to live in the wild for at least 20 days. [6] In captivity, they live for more than a month and have been recorded to live up to 186 days. [2] This is significantly longer than other temperate and tropical butterflies, which live for a month at best in captivity. H. erato's longevity can be explained by its benign climate and undoubted unpalatability, as well as the benefits from digesting pollen. [6]

Larva Heliconius erato caterpillar2.jpg
Larva

Egg

The H. erato female lays one to four yellow eggs a day that average 1.5 mm in height and 0.9 mm in diameter. [8] [4] The eggs have a unique texture, with about 16 vertical and 11 horizontal ridges. Some plants mimic this in order to discourage females from ovipositing on them. [8]

Larva

The caterpillar appearance is very discrete when young and has a small, dark prothoracic plate. As it matures, its appearance grows more colorful. Caterpillars of H. erato chestertonii have a unique dark stripe on their side. In its fifth instar, it has a white body with black and orange spots, black spikes, and a yellow head. [8]

Pupa

Pupae reside on the stem of host plants. Heliconius pupae are usually camouflaged and have defensive spikes. Pupae may be light or dark. [8]

Imago

Adult males have androconial scales on the subcostal region of their hindwings and on their median membrane. [8] Adult wingspans range from about 6.7 to 8.0 cm.

Adults have a variety of phenotypes, all with red coloration. These include: dennis-ray pattern ("dennis" refers to a red patch on the forewing; "ray" refers to red lines on the hindwing); [19] red on the forewing with yellow on the hindwing; yellow on the forewing and red on the hindwing; and white or yellow on the hindwing and forewing. [8] H. erato chestertonii is the only subspecies without any red markings, instead displaying blue.

Enemies

H. erato is preyed on by birds, lizards, monkeys, and mantids, but is relatively safe due to its unpalatability and protective coloration. [9] [6]

Protective coloration

Müllerian mimicry

H. erato is particularly distasteful to predators. Subspecies have evolved as Müllerian mimics, sharing aposematic patterns with other species in order to deter common predators. They typically co-mimic with other species of Heliconius, most often H. melpomene , which matches with at least 20 of the 27 subspecies. [2] [3] Subspecies have region-specific patterns that correspond to their regional mimics. H. erato chestertonii is unique as it displays blue on its wings while most other subspecies have red markings. It is the only subspecies that lacks a H. melpomene co-mimic: instead, its pattern corresponds with a subspecies of H. cydno, H. cydno gustavi. [9]

Variations from the geographical phenotype of subspecies are penalized by increased predation. In one study, researchers painted H. erato petiverana in Costa Rica to look like H. erato chestertonii from Colombia. These two subspecies successfully warn predators in their own regions with Müllerian patterns with H. melpomene rosina and H. cydno gustavi, respectively. However, the painted H. erato petiverana subjects suffered from increased predation: the H. erato chestertonii phenotype was found to be unfavorable in Costa Rica. This is because their markings did not match the Müllerian pattern of the area, so predators could not recognize their distastefulness. [9]

Genetics

Subspecies

Listed alphabetically: [1]

  • H. e. adanaTurner, 1967
  • H. e. amalfredaRiffarth, 1901
  • H. e. amazonaStaudinger, 1897
  • H. e. chestertoniiHewitson, 1872
  • H. e. colombinaStaudinger, 1897
  • H. e. cruentusLamas, 1998
  • H. e. cyrbiaGodart, 1819
  • H. e. demophoonMénétriés, 1855
  • H. e. dignusStichel, 1923
  • H. e. emmaRiffarth, 1901
  • H. e. erato(Linnaeus, 1758) [20]
  • H. e. estrellaBates, 1862
  • H. e. etylusSalvin, 1871
  • H. e. favorinusHopffer, 1874
  • H. e. fuscombeiLamas, 1976
  • H. e. guaricaReakirt, 1868
  • H. e. hydaraHewitson, 1867
  • H. e. lativittaButler, 1877
  • H. e. lichyiBrown & Fernández, 1985
  • H. e. magnificaRiffarth, 1900
  • H. e. microcleaKaye, 1907
  • H. e. notabilisSalvin & Godman, 1868
  • H. e. petiverana Doubleday, 1847
  • H. e. phyllis(Fabricius, 1775)
  • H. e. reductimaculaBryk, 1953
  • H. e. tobagoensisBarcant, 1982
  • H. e. venustusSalvin, 1871

Genetics of color patterns

The optix gene encodes the complex red coloration of Heliconius wings. An approximately 50-kb area in the intergenic region near the gene is shared by H. erato and other Heliconius, which contains cis-regulatory elements that control expression of optix. [19]

The clade containing Heliconius erato radiated before Heliconius melpomene, establishing the wing pattern diversity found in both species of butterfly. [3]

A genetic divide exists between the subspecies on either side of the Andes mountains, resulting in two distinct clades. The eastern clade is from Amazonia, southeastern Brazil, and Guiana, and consists of the subspecies dingus, emma, lativitta, phyllis, notabilis, favorinus, erato, hydara, and venustus. The western clade is from Central America and the Pacific slope of South America and consists of petiverana, hydara, venus, guarica, and cyrbia. This distinction is confirmed by sequence divergence: there is more divergence between the clades and less divergence within each clade. In addition, while there are similar haplotypes between the clades, they result in drastically different phenotypes - likely due to changes in genetic pathways for wing pattern during independent evolution. Mitochondrial DNA invariability also suggests recent radiation of these clades, probably within the last 200,000 years. These findings are consistent with the Pleistocene refugia hypothesis: in the late Pleistocene epoch, climate change reduced once widespread habitable forest areas, resulting in allopatric speciation. [3]

Mating

"H. erato" mating A pairing of two butterflies at Pacific Science Center.jpg
"H. erato" mating

Males scout out females during the day and often mate with females as they emerge from the chrysalis. [8] Many males sit at female pupae waiting for them to emerge and are undisturbed by any commotion. Females mate with only one male at a time and can reproduce throughout life. [4] All subspecies can potentially mate across subspecies, but interspecies offspring are not common. These offspring only survive well in extremely specific hybrid regions and are unsuccessful elsewhere because their unusual recombinant phenotype attracts more predators. [3]

Pheromones

Adult males have androconial scales which disseminate pheromones to attract mates. [8] Males transfer an anti-aphrodisiac to females during copulation, which repulses and repels other potential mates from the female. It smells similar to phenylcarbylamine, or witch hazel. It emanates from two external protrusions on the abdomen of the female, which are adjacent to yellow glands that are thought to store the pheromone. The pheromone is rarely detected in males as they store it internally. The odor on females can last for weeks, even months, and is advantageous as neither sex wastes time or risks injury in subsequent matings. H. erato chestertonii has an odor distinct from other subspecies. No other Lepidoptera exhibit this behavior. [4]

Physiology

Vision

H. erato has compound eyes, meaning that each eye consists of many individual photoreceptor units. H. erato eyes are unique in that they have at least five different kinds of photoreceptors and are sexually dimorphic, despite having sexually monomorphic wing patterns. (Butterflies with sexually dimorphic eyes typically have sexually dimorphic wing patterns.) The males lack protein expression of one of the SW (short-wave) opsins, which are light-sensitive proteins found in the retina. The UV discrimination conferred by this missing protein may cause males to mistake female co-mimics of other species. While inefficient, this option may have evolved because it is less costly than producing and using the UV machinery. Females, on the other hand, use this ability discriminate H. erato males from other co-mimics because they eventually invest more into egg production and can only mate with a few males. [21]

Origins

One study used amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) data sets to place the origins of H. erato at 2.8 million years ago. H. erato also shows clustering of AFLPs by geography revealing that H. erato originated in western South America. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Butterfly</span> Group of insects in the order Lepidoptera

Butterflies (Rhopalocera) are insects that have large, often brightly coloured wings, and a conspicuous, fluttering flight. The group comprises the superfamilies Hedyloidea and Papilionoidea. The oldest butterfly fossils have been dated to the Paleocene, about 56 million years ago, though they may have originated earlier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mimicry</span> Imitation of another species for selective advantage

In evolutionary biology, mimicry is an evolved resemblance between an organism and another object, often an organism of another species. Mimicry may evolve between different species, or between individuals of the same species. Often, mimicry functions to protect a species from predators, making it an anti-predator adaptation. Mimicry evolves if a receiver perceives the similarity between a mimic and a model and as a result changes its behaviour in a way that provides a selective advantage to the mimic. The resemblances that evolve in mimicry can be visual, acoustic, chemical, tactile, or electric, or combinations of these sensory modalities. Mimicry may be to the advantage of both organisms that share a resemblance, in which case it is a form of mutualism; or mimicry can be to the detriment of one, making it parasitic or competitive. The evolutionary convergence between groups is driven by the selective action of a signal-receiver or dupe. Birds, for example, use sight to identify palatable insects and butterflies, whilst avoiding the noxious ones. Over time, palatable insects may evolve to resemble noxious ones, making them mimics and the noxious ones models. In the case of mutualism, sometimes both groups are referred to as "co-mimics". It is often thought that models must be more abundant than mimics, but this is not so. Mimicry may involve numerous species; many harmless species such as hoverflies are Batesian mimics of strongly defended species such as wasps, while many such well-defended species form Müllerian mimicry rings, all resembling each other. Mimicry between prey species and their predators often involves three or more species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gulf fritillary</span> Sole species in brush-footed butterfly genus Agraulis

The Gulf fritillary or passion butterfly is a bright orange butterfly in the subfamily Heliconiinae of the family Nymphalidae. That subfamily was formerly set apart as a separate family, the Heliconiidae. The Heliconiinae are "longwing butterflies", which have long, narrow wings compared to other butterflies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Batesian mimicry</span> Bluffing imitation of a strongly defended species

Batesian mimicry is a form of mimicry where a harmless species has evolved to imitate the warning signals of a harmful species directed at a predator of them both. It is named after the English naturalist Henry Walter Bates, after his work on butterflies in the rainforests of Brazil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Viceroy (butterfly)</span> Species of butterfly

The viceroy is a North American butterfly. It was long thought to be a Batesian mimic of the monarch butterfly, but since the viceroy is also distasteful to predators, it is now considered a Müllerian mimic instead.

<i>Heliconius charithonia</i> Species of butterfly

Heliconius charithonia, the zebra longwing or zebra heliconian, is a species of butterfly belonging to the subfamily Heliconiinae of the family Nymphalidae. It was first described by Carl Linnaeus in his 1767 12th edition of Systema Naturae. The boldly striped black and white wing pattern is aposematic, warning off predators.

<i>Dryas iulia</i> Sole species of brush-footed butterfly genus Dryas

Dryas iulia, commonly called the Julia butterfly, Julia heliconian, the flame, or flambeau, is a species of brush-footed butterfly. The sole representative of its genus Dryas, it is native from Brazil to southern Texas and Florida, and in summer can sometimes be found as far north as eastern Nebraska. Over 15 subspecies have been described.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Müllerian mimicry</span> Mutually beneficial mimicry of strongly defended species

Müllerian mimicry is a natural phenomenon in which two or more well-defended species, often foul-tasting and sharing common predators, have come to mimic each other's honest warning signals, to their mutual benefit. The benefit to Müllerian mimics is that predators only need one unpleasant encounter with one member of a set of Müllerian mimics, and thereafter avoid all similar coloration, whether or not it belongs to the same species as the initial encounter. It is named after the German naturalist Fritz Müller, who first proposed the concept in 1878, supporting his theory with the first mathematical model of frequency-dependent selection, one of the first such models anywhere in biology.

<i>Danaus chrysippus</i> Species of butterfly

Danaus chrysippus, also known as the plain tiger, African queen, or African monarch, is a medium-sized butterfly widespread in Asia, Australia and Africa. It belongs to the Danainae subfamily of the brush-footed butterfly family Nymphalidae. Danainae primarily consume plants in the genus Asclepias, more commonly called milkweed. Milkweed contains toxic compounds, cardenolides, which are often consumed and stored by many butterflies. Because of their emetic properties, the plain tiger is unpalatable to most predators. As a result, its coloration is widely mimicked by other species of butterflies. The plain tiger inhabits a wide variety of habitats, although it is less likely to thrive in jungle-like conditions and is most often found in drier, wide-open areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Queen (butterfly)</span> Species of butterfly

The queen butterfly is a North and South American butterfly in the family Nymphalidae with a wingspan of 80–85 mm. It is orange or brown with black wing borders and small white forewing spots on its dorsal wing surface, and reddish ventral wing surface fairly similar to the dorsal surface. The ventral hindwings have black veins and small white spots in a black border. The male has a black androconial scent patch on its dorsal hindwings. It can be found in meadows, fields, marshes, deserts, and at the edges of forests.

<i>Heliconius cydno</i> Species of butterfly

Heliconius cydno, the cydno longwing, is a nymphalid butterfly that ranges from Mexico to northern South America. It is typically found in the forest understory and deposits its eggs on a variety of plants of the genus Passiflora. It is a member of the Heliconiinae subfamily of Central and South America, and it is the only heliconiine that can be considered oligophagous. H. cydno is also characterized by hybridization and Müllerian mimicry. Wing coloration plays a key role in mate choice and has further implications in regards to sympatric speciation. Macrolide scent gland extracts and wing-clicking behavior further characterize this species.

<i>Heliconius</i> Genus of brush-footed butterflies

Heliconius comprises a colorful and widespread genus of brush-footed butterflies commonly known as the longwings or heliconians. This genus is distributed throughout the tropical and subtropical regions of the New World, from South America as far north as the southern United States. The larvae of these butterflies eat passion flower vines (Passifloraceae). Adults exhibit bright wing color patterns which signal their distastefulness to potential predators.

<i>Heliconius melpomene</i> Species of butterfly

Heliconius melpomene, the postman butterfly, common postman or simply postman, is a brightly colored butterfly found throughout Central and South America. It was first described by Carl Linnaeus in his 1758 10th edition of Systema Naturae. Its coloration coevolved with a sister species H. erato as a warning to predators of its inedibility; this is an example of Müllerian mimicry. H. melpomene was one of the first butterfly species observed to forage for pollen, a behavior that is common in other groups but rare in butterflies. Because of the recent rapid evolutionary radiation of the genus Heliconius and overlapping of its habitat with other related species, H. melpomene has been the subject of extensive study on speciation and hybridization. These hybrids tend to have low fitness as they look different from the original species and no longer exhibit Müllerian mimicry.

<i>Heliconius ismenius</i> Species of butterfly

Heliconius ismenius, the Ismenius tiger or tiger heliconian, is a butterfly of the family Nymphalidae found in Central America and northern South America. They are abundant as far south as Ecuador and Venezuela and as far north as southern Mexico, Guatemala and Belize. H. ismenius are more commonly called the tiger-striped long wing butterfly. H. ismenius's nickname is derived from its long wing structure as well as the beautiful burnt orange and black stripes. Pierre André Latreille, a French zoologist, described Heliconius ismenius in 1817. H. ismenius resembles a number of other butterflies, an example of Müllerian mimicry.

<i>Heliconius heurippa</i> Species of butterfly

Heliconius heurippa is a butterfly of the genus Heliconius that is believed by some scientists to be a separate species from—but a hybrid of—the species Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene, making H. heurippa an example of hybrid speciation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemical mimicry</span> Biological mimicry using chemicals

Chemical mimicry is a type of biological mimicry involving the use of chemicals to dupe an operator.

<i>Heliconius numata</i> Species of butterfly

Heliconius numata, the Numata longwing, is a brush-footed butterfly species belonging to the family Nymphalidae, subfamily Heliconiinae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evo-devo gene toolkit</span>

The evo-devo gene toolkit is the small subset of genes in an organism's genome whose products control the organism's embryonic development. Toolkit genes are central to the synthesis of molecular genetics, palaeontology, evolution and developmental biology in the science of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo). Many of them are ancient and highly conserved among animal phyla.

<i>Heliconius eleuchia</i> Species of butterfly

Heliconius eleuchia, the white-edged longwing, is a species of Heliconius butterfly described by William Chapman Hewitson in 1853.

Heliconius erato petiverana is a subspecies or geographical race of the widespread neotropical nymphalid butterfly, Heliconius erato. It is characterized by a red forewing patch and a yellow transverse stripe on the hindwing, on an otherwise black or dark brown background.The type locality is "Mexico", and the form occurs from southern Texas to central Panama. Some lepidopterists distinguish the named forms H. erato cruentus and H. erato demophoon as separate races, based on the size of the red FW patch and the thickness of the yellow HW stripe.

References

  1. 1 2 Markku Savela. "Heliconius erato". Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms. Retrieved February 5, 2011.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Gilbert, Lawrence E. (1972). "Pollen Feeding and Reproductive Biology of Heliconius Butterflies". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 69 (6): 1403–1407. Bibcode:1972PNAS...69.1403G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.6.1403 . JSTOR   61399. PMC   426712 . PMID   16591992.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Brower, Andrew V. Z. (1994). "Rapid Morphological Radiation and Convergence Among Races of the Butterfly Heliconius erato Inferred from Patterns of Mitochondrial DNA Evolution". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 91 (14): 6491–6495. Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.6491B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6491 . JSTOR   2364999. PMC   44228 . PMID   8022810.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Gilbert, Lawrence E. (1976). "Postmating Female Odor in Heliconius Butterflies: A Male-Contributed Antiaphrodisiac?". Science. 193 (4251): 419–420. Bibcode:1976Sci...193..419G. doi:10.1126/science.935877. JSTOR   1742803. PMID   935877.
  5. Thiele, Sabrina Campos; Milcharek, Oscar; Santos, Fábio Luis dos; Kaminski, Lucas Augusto (2014). "Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea) of Porto Mauá, Upper Paraná Atlantic Forest Ecoregion, Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil". Biota Neotropica. 14 (2): 1–10. doi: 10.1590/1676-06032014000613 .
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Turner, John R. G. (1971). "Experiments on the Demography of Tropical Butterflies. II. Longevity and Home-Range Behaviour in Heliconius erato". Biotropica. 3 (1): 21–31. doi:10.2307/2989703. JSTOR   2989703.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Kerpel, Solange; Gilson, Moreira (May 3, 2005). "Absence of Learning and Local Specialization on Host Plant Selection by Heliconius erato". Journal of Insect Behavior. 18 (3): 433–452. doi:10.1007/s10905-005-3701-7. S2CID   12835413.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Brown, Jr., Keith (1981). "The Biology of Heliconius and Related Genera". Annual Review of Entomology. 26: 427–457. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.26.010181.002235.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Benson, Woodruff W. (1972). "Natural Selection for Mullerian Mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica". Science. 176 (4037): 936–939. Bibcode:1972Sci...176..936B. doi:10.1126/science.176.4037.936. JSTOR   1733812. PMID   17829303. S2CID   26726190.
  10. 1 2 Brussard, Peter F.; Gilbert, Lawrence E.; Raven, Peter H. (March 1976). "Coevolution of Animals and Plants". Evolution. 30 (1): 199. doi:10.2307/2407693. ISSN   0014-3820. JSTOR   2407693.
  11. Brower, L. P.; van Brower, J.; Corvino, J. M. (1967-04-01). "Plant poisons in a terrestrial food chain". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 57 (4): 893–898. Bibcode:1967PNAS...57..893B. doi: 10.1073/pnas.57.4.893 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   224631 . PMID   5231352.
  12. 1 2 Hay-Roe, Mirian Medina; Nation, James (2008-04-05). "Spectrum of Cyanide Toxicity and Allocation in Heliconius erato and Passiflora Host Plants". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 34 (5): 696. doi: 10.1007/s10886-008-9465-8 . ISSN   0098-0331.
  13. 1 2 Hay-Roe, Mirian Medina. (2004). Comparative processing of cyanogenic glycosides and a novel cyanide inhibitory enzyme in Heliconius butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Heliconiinae). OCLC   880637413.
  14. Hay-Roe, Mirian Medina; Nation, James (2007-01-03). "Spectrum of Cyanide Toxicity and Allocation in Heliconius erato and Passiflora Host Plants". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 33 (2): 319–329. doi:10.1007/s10886-006-9234-5. ISSN   0098-0331. PMID   17200887. S2CID   24930066.
  15. JORGE, LEONARDO R.; CORDEIRO-ESTRELA, PEDRO; KLACZKO, LOUIS B.; MOREIRA, GILSON R. P.; FREITAS, ANDRÉ V. L. (2011-01-28). "Host-plant dependent wing phenotypic variation in the neotropical butterfly Heliconius erato". Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 102 (4): 765–774. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01610.x . ISSN   0024-4066.
  16. RODRIGUES, D.; MOREIRA, G. R. P. (May 2002). "Geographical variation in larval host-plant use by Heliconius erato (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) and consequences for adult life history". Brazilian Journal of Biology. 62 (2): 321–332. doi: 10.1590/s1519-69842002000200016 . ISSN   1519-6984. PMID   12489404.
  17. Ehrlich, Paul R.; Gilbert, Lawrence E. (September 1973). "Population Structure and Dynamics of the Tropical Butterfly Heliconius ethilla". Biotropica. 5 (2): 69. doi:10.2307/2989656. ISSN   0006-3606. JSTOR   2989656.
  18. Smiley, John (1978). "Plant Chemistry and the Evolution of Host Specificity: New Evidence from Heliconius and Passiflora". Science. 201 (4357): 745–747. Bibcode:1978Sci...201..745S. doi:10.1126/science.201.4357.745. PMID   17750235. S2CID   35030853.
  19. 1 2 Wallbank, Richard W. R.; Baxter, Simon W.; Pardo-Diaz, Carolina; Hanly, Joseph J.; Martin, Simon H.; Mallet, James; Dasmahapatra, Kanchon K.; Salazar, Camilo; Joron, Mathieu (2016-01-15). "Evolutionary Novelty in a Butterfly Wing Pattern through Enhancer Shuffling". PLOS Biology. 14 (1): e1002353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002353 . ISSN   1545-7885. PMC   4714872 . PMID   26771987.
  20. Heliconius erato, Butterflies and Moths of North America
  21. McCulloch, Kyle J.; Osorio, Daniel; Briscoe, Adriana D. (2016-08-01). "Sexual dimorphism in the compound eye of Heliconius erato: a nymphalid butterfly with at least five spectral classes of photoreceptor". Journal of Experimental Biology. 219 (15): 2377–2387. doi: 10.1242/jeb.136523 . ISSN   0022-0949. PMID   27247318.
  22. Swee-Peck Quek; Brian A. Counterman; Priscila Albuquerque de Moura; Marcio Z. Cardoso; Charles R. Marshall; W. Owen McMillan; Marcus R. Kronforst (2010). "Dissecting comimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies" (PDF). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 107 (7365–7370): 7365–7370. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.7365Q. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911572107 . PMC   2867687 . PMID   20368448.