Hell or high water clause

Last updated

A hell or high water clause is a clause in a contract, usually a lease, which provides that the payments must continue irrespective of any difficulties which the paying party may encounter, usually in relation to the operation of the leased asset. The clause usually forms part of a parent company guarantee that is intended to limit the applicability of the doctrines of impossibility or frustration of purpose. The term for the clause comes from a colloquial expression that a task must be accomplished "come hell or high water", that is, regardless of any difficulty.

Contents

History

Linguistic historian Robert Hendrickson claims in his book Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins that the saying derives from a phrase used by sailors in the 1600s “between the devil and the deep blue sea”. [1]

The first mention of a hell or high water clause in United States case law was in the February 2nd, 1960 case of Matits vs. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. In that case, Nationwide sought to deny insurance coverage to a woman who loaned her car to a friend, after the friend got into a collision. Due to the particular wording of the omnibus clause within the insurance policy, which in itself contains the hell or high water clause, the court ruled that Nationwide must provide coverage for the collision. [2]

Applicable transactions

Equipment leases

One of the most common uses for a hell or high water clause is the writing of equipment leases. Whether or not the phrase "hell or high water" is explicitly written, the general meaning of it has been included in a majority of equipment leasing contracts over the past few decades. [3] The clause requires that the lessee assumes virtually the entirety of the risk associated with the rented equipment, even in extreme cases. This includes but is not limited to cases where the equipment is destroyed, lost in some way, deemed inoperable, neglected repairs, deemed unfit for use, or even when the purchaser dies. [4] [5]

Project finance transactions

Another key aspect of the protections provided by the hell or high water clause is that it applies to the lessor's funding sources. [3] In the industry of equipment leasing, lessees have two broad options: lease equipment from a company that owns the equipment or sign a contract with an equipment finance company which will pay for the equipment. Even if the person or organization that funds the transaction did not sign the contract between the lessor and lessee, they are still shielded by the clause and can rest assured that nearly all the risk is attributed to the lessee, except in the case of credit failure. [6] In cases where the lessor is viewed solely as a source for money, the lessor is provided special protections by Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code discussed in the “Enforceability” section of this article.

Real estate leases

The concept of hell or high water exists in the real estate market, but only in commercial real estate. It is not very widely used in real estate, and is generally only used in bond leases, which are also referred to as "triple net leases" or "hell or high water leases". [7] [8] Typical triple net leases require tenants to be responsible for paying rent, utilities, maintenance, HVAC expenses, roofing repairs, and even property taxes. Hell or high water leases take the typical triple net lease a couple steps further by making the tenant to be responsible for every fathomable expense related to the property, which in effect makes the hell or high water lease the most extreme form of triple net leases. As with some other applicable transactions of hell or high water, this type of lease makes the tenant responsible for payments associated with unexpected events which some refer to as acts of god. At no point is the tenant allowed to terminate the lease or receive rent abatements. If a property is condemned for whatever reason, the tenant must continue to pay rent despite not being able to inhabit the property. If the property is destroyed or damaged, not only does the tenant still need to pay the agreed upon rent, but the tenant must pay to either replace or repair the building regardless if the insurance claim covers the cost.[ citation needed ]

Mergers and acquisitions

When attempting to merge two businesses or acquire another, one big roadblock that companies typically come across is antitrust law. Companies must negotiate on how to split the costs of potential litigation, fines, divestitures, and expensive antitrust investigations. When one party has more leverage in this negotiation, they may consider utilizing a hell or high water clause. This allows one party to assign all the financial risks associated with antitrust approval to the other party. It may seem surprising that any company would agree to a merger with a hell or high water clause, but sometimes agreeing to the clause is the only way the party with less leverage can secure the deal (e.g. because there are competitors for the stronger company). Additionally, companies may agree to a hell or high water clause because they assess that the risk of antitrust complications is low, or simply because the opportunity outweighs the risk. If a company agrees to take responsibility for all the risk by signing a hell or high water clause then they are required to take all actions possible to secure antitrust approval. [9]

High-yield bonds (junk bonds)

When a company's credit rating falls it may have difficulty raising money via debt financing. Since it is riskier to buy a bond from a company with bad credit, their bonds are rated below invest-grade and referred to as junk bonds. To mitigate risk for noteholders, companies with low credit ratings that issue bonds must operate within a set of covenants that restrict the issuer's ability to take on further risk. Many of the covenants relate to the company incurring additional debt, but some covenants address changing ownership structure, paying dividends, or selling off assets. [10] Despite all the restrictions of the covenants, companies are allowed some freedom through an idea called "baskets", where the company is allowed to bypass a certain covenant, usually by incurring a limited amount of debt in specific, agreed upon situations. The concept of hell or high water comes into play with a special basket that is named either the hell or high water basket or the general basket. This basket permits the company to incur a limited amount of debt for any reason, especially come hell or high water. [10]

Enforceability

In both United States law and U.K. law, the hell or high water clause has historically been upheld in numerous cases. In the United States, this clause is given special protection under Article 2A of the Uniform Commercial Code when the agreement is classified as a finance lease. The article states that this special protection applies to a lease that “consists of an overall three-party transaction in which: (1) the lessor does not select, manufacture or supply the goods, (2) the lessor did not own the goods before the lease was arranged and (3) the lessee either approves the purchase contract or receives specified warranty and supplier information before signing the lease agreement”. [11]

Exceptions

There are some exceptions to the enforceability of the hell or high water clause:

Effects of COVID-19

Some lawyers believe that hell or high water clauses will be upheld during the pandemic, given that pandemics are seen as an act of god, and because in the past acts of god such as Hurricane Sandy have not exempted lessees from their obligations under a hell or high water clause. [14] Some lawyers instead draw a distinction between past acts of god and COVID-19 in that the government forced many businesses to shut down, and speculate that courts would be hard-pressed to rule in favor of the lessor in this situation. [15]

Example clause

[Party's] obligations to pay all amounts due are absolute and unconditional and shall not be subject to any abatement, reduction, set off, defense, counterclaim, interruption, deferment or recoupment for any reason whatsoever.

— Hitachi Data Sys. Credit Corp. v. Precision Discovery, Inc., 17-Cv-6851 (SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2019)

Notable cases

General Electric Capital Corp. v. FPL Services Corp., 986 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (N.D. Iowa 2013)

Hitachi Data Sys. Credit Corp. v. Precision Discovery, Inc., 17-Cv-6851 (SHS), (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 24, 2020)

McNatt v. Colonial Pacific Leasing Corp., 221 Ga. App. 768 (472 S.E.2d 435) (1996)

Equitex, Inc. v. Ungar, 60 P.3d 746, 750 (Colo. App. 2002)

Matits vs Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 59 N.J. Super. 373 (1960) (described in “History” section)

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lease</span> Contractual agreement in which an assets owner lets someone else use it in exchange for payment

A lease is a contractual arrangement calling for the user to pay the owner for the use of an asset. Property, buildings and vehicles are common assets that are leased. Industrial or business equipment are also leased. Basically a lease agreement is a contract between two parties: the lessor and the lessee. The lessor is the legal owner of the asset, while the lessee obtains the right to use the asset in return for regular rental payments. The lessee also agrees to abide by various conditions regarding their use of the property or equipment. For example, a person leasing a car may agree to the condition that the car will only be used for personal use.

Assignment is a legal term used in the context of the laws of contract and of property. In both instances, assignment is the process whereby a person, the assignor, transfers rights or benefits to another, the assignee. An assignment may not transfer a duty, burden or detriment without the express agreement of the assignee. The right or benefit being assigned may be a gift or it may be paid for with a contractual consideration such as money.

A rental agreement is a contract of rental, usually written, between the owner of a property and a renter who desires to have temporary possession of the property; it is distinguished from a lease, which is more typically for a fixed term. As a minimum, the agreement identifies the parties, the property, the term of the rental, and the amount of rent for the term. The owner of the property may be referred to as the lessor and the renter as the lessee.

Closed-end leasing is a contract-based system governed by law in the U.S. and Canada. It allows a person the use of property for a fixed term, and the right to buy that property for the agreed residual value when the term expires.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Accounting for leases in the United States</span> US accounting standard

Accounting for leases in the United States is regulated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) by the Financial Accounting Standards Number 13, now known as Accounting Standards Codification Topic 840. These standards were effective as of January 1, 1977. The FASB completed in February 2016 a revision of the lease accounting standard, referred to as ASC 842.

The expression "operating lease" is somewhat confusing as it has a different meaning based on the context that is under consideration. From a product characteristic standpoint, this type of a lease, as distinguished from a finance lease, is one where the lessor takes larger residual risk, whereas finance leases have no or a very low residual value position. As such, the operating lease is non full payout. From an accounting standpoint, this type of lease results in off balance sheet financing which can be advantageous for companies in terms of gearing and other accounting ratios.

A finance lease is a type of lease in which a finance company is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee not only has operating control over the asset but also some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset.

<i>Paradine v Jane</i>

Paradine v Jane [1647] EWHC KB J5 is an English contract law case which established absolute liability for contractual debts.

A novated lease is a motor vehicle lease which has been novated, that is, the obligations in the contract have been transferred from one party to another.

Leaseback, short for "sale-and-leaseback", is a financial transaction in which one sells an asset and leases it back for the long term; therefore, one continues to be able to use the asset but no longer owns it. The transaction is generally done for fixed assets, notably real estate, as well as for durable and capital goods such as airplanes and trains. The concept can also be applied by national governments to territorial assets; prior to the Falklands War, the government of the United Kingdom proposed a leaseback arrangement whereby the Falklands Islands would be transferred to Argentina, with a 99-year leaseback period, and a similar arrangement, also for 99 years, had been in place prior to the handover of Hong Kong to mainland China. Leaseback arrangements are usually employed because they confer financing, accounting or taxation benefits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian contract law</span> Overview of contract law in Canada

Canadian contract law is composed of two parallel systems: a common law framework outside Québec and a civil law framework within Québec. Outside Québec, Canadian contract law is derived from English contract law, though it has developed distinctly since Canadian Confederation in 1867. While Québecois contract law was originally derived from that which existed in France at the time of Québec's annexation into the British Empire, it was overhauled and codified first in the Civil Code of Lower Canada and later in the current Civil Code of Quebec, which codifies most elements of contract law as part of its provisions on the broader law of obligations. Individual common law provinces have codified certain contractual rules in a Sale of Goods Act, resembling equivalent statutes elsewhere in the Commonwealth. As most aspects of contract law in Canada are the subject of provincial jurisdiction under the Canadian Constitution, contract law may differ even between the country's common law provinces and territories. Conversely; as the law regarding bills of exchange and promissory notes, trade and commerce, maritime law, and banking among other related areas is governed by federal law under Section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867; aspects of contract law pertaining to these topics are harmonised between Québec and the common law provinces.

In the field of commercial real estate, especially in the United States, a net lease requires the tenant to pay, in addition to rent, some or all of the property expenses that normally would be paid by the property owner. These include expenses such as property taxes, insurance, maintenance, repair, and operations, utilities, and other items. These expenses are often categorized into the "three nets": property taxes, insurance, and maintenance. In US parlance, a lease where all three of these expenses are paid by the tenant is known as a triple net lease, NNN Lease, or triple-N for short and sometimes written NNN.

Oil and gas law in the United States is the branch of law that pertains to the acquisition and ownership rights in oil and gas both under the soil before discovery and after its capture, and adjudication regarding those rights.

Equirex Leasing Corp., is a capital leasing company with its headquarters in Oakville, Ontario, Canada. Founded in 1996, Equirex finances leases in every province in Canada.

The South African law of lease is an area of the legal system in South Africa which describes the rules applicable to a contract of lease. This is broadly defined as a synallagmatic contract between two parties, the lessor and the lessee, in terms of which one, the lessor, binds himself to give the other, the lessee, the temporary use and enjoyment of a thing, in whole or in part, or of his services or those of another person; the lessee, meanwhile, binds himself to pay a sum of money as compensation, or rent, for that use and enjoyment. The law of lease is often discussed as a counterpart to the law of sale.

In Pete's Warehousing and Sales CC v Bowsink Investments CC, an important case in the South African law of lease, Pete's Warehousing and Bowsink Investments entered into an agreement of lease in terms of which Pete's Warehousing hired certain premises from Bowsink Investments for use as a storage warehouse.

Lessor is a participant of the lease who takes possession of the property and provides it as a leasing subject to the lessee for temporary possession. For example, in leasehold estate, the landlord is the lessor and the tenant is the lessee. The lessor may be the owner of the property or an agent authorized on the owner's behalf. Commercial banks, credit non-bank organizations, leasing companies often act as lessors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Retail leasing</span>

A retail lease is a legal document outlining the terms under which one party agrees to rent property from another party. A lease guarantees the lessee use of an asset and guarantees the lessor regular payments from the lessee for a specified number of months or years. Both the lessee and the lessor must uphold the terms of the contract for the lease to remain valid.

<i>Arnold v Britton</i>

Arnold v Britton[2013] EWCA Civ 902 is an English contract law case on implied terms.

Ijarah,, is a term of fiqh and product in Islamic banking and finance. In traditional fiqh, it means a contract for the hiring of persons or renting/leasing of the services or the “usufruct” of a property, generally for a fixed period and price. In hiring, the employer is called musta’jir, while the employee is called ajir. Ijarah need not lead to purchase. In conventional leasing an "operating lease" does not end in a change of ownership, nor does the type of ijarah known as al-ijarah (tashghiliyah).

References

  1. ↑ Hendrickson, Robert (1997). The Encyclopedia of Word and Phrase Origins. New York: Facts on File.
  2. ↑ "Matits v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 157 A. 2d 853 (1960)". Google Scholar. Retrieved October 18, 2021.
  3. 1 2 Bent, Paul (January 2018). "'Trial of the Century' Takes on Hell or High Water". Law Journal Newsletters. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  4. ↑ Graynor, Barry A.; Davidson, Teresa; Huddleson, Edwin E.; Whelan, Stephen T. (2007). "Uniform Commercial Code: Leases". Business Law. 63: 1301.
  5. ↑ UCC   § 2A-504 . Liquidation of Damages.
  6. ↑ Weinberg, Kenneth P. (November–December 2015). "Structured Finance and Revenue Streams: Not Absolute and Unconditional". Monitor. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  7. ↑ Cozmei, Cătălina; Onofrei, Muler (2012). "Impact of Property Taxes on Commercial Real Estate Competition in Romania". Procedia Economics and Finance. 3: 604–610. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00202-X .
  8. ↑ McMurray, John; Mundel, Samuel (September 1997). "Real estate lease-backed securities" (PDF). DSpace@MIT. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. p. 37. Retrieved October 18, 2021.
  9. ↑ Proskauer Rose LLP (September 20, 2019). "When Mergers Go Bad: How Merger Agreements Deal with Antitrust Risk in Today's Market". JD Supra. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  10. 1 2 "High Yield Bonds - An Issuer's Guide (US Edition)". Perspectives & Events. Mayer Brown. December 2016.
  11. ↑ "U.C.C. - ARTICLE 2A - LEASES (2002)". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  12. ↑ Gordon, Jason (December 17, 2020). "Hell or High Water Contract Explained". The Business Professor. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  13. ↑ "Attempting to avoid the Hell or High Water Clause by alleging Fraudulent Inducement". Dispatches from the Trenches. Baker Donelson. January 1, 2007. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  14. ↑ Troutman Pepper (May 8, 2020). "Enforceability of 'Hell or High Water' Clauses in the COVID-19 Business Environment". JD Supra. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  15. ↑ Blundell, Steph (April 30, 2020). "Come hell or high water, or Covid-19: Managing contractual risks". Planning, BIM & Construction Today. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
    This page is based on this Wikipedia article
    Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
    Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.