Hofstadter's butterfly

Rendering of the butterfly by Hofstadter

In condensed matter physics, Hofstadter's butterfly is a graph of the spectral properties of non-interacting two-dimensional electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field in a lattice. The fractal, self-similar nature of the spectrum was discovered in the 1976 Ph.D. work of Douglas Hofstadter ^[1] and is one of the early examples of modern scientific data visualization. The name reflects the fact that, as Hofstadter wrote, "the large gaps [in the graph] form a very striking pattern somewhat resembling a butterfly." ^[1]

The Hofstadter butterfly plays an important role in the theory of the integer quantum Hall effect and the theory of topological quantum numbers.

History

The first mathematical description of electrons on a 2D lattice, acted on by a perpendicular homogeneous magnetic field, was studied by Rudolf Peierls and his student R. G. Harper in the 1950s. ^{[2] [3]}

Hofstadter first described the structure in 1976 in an article on the energy levels of Bloch electrons in perpendicular magnetic fields. ^[1] It gives a graphical representation of the spectrum of Harper's equation at different frequencies. One key aspect of the mathematical structure of this spectrum – the splitting of energy bands for a specific value of the magnetic field, along a single dimension (energy) – had been previously mentioned in passing by Soviet physicist Mark Azbel in 1964 ^[4] (in a paper cited by Hofstadter), but Hofstadter greatly expanded upon that work by plotting all values of the magnetic field against all energy values, creating the two-dimensional plot that first revealed the spectrum's uniquely recursive geometric properties. ^[1]

Written while Hofstadter was at the University of Oregon, his paper was influential in directing further research. It predicted on theoretical grounds that the allowed energy level values of an electron in a two-dimensional square lattice, as a function of a magnetic field applied perpendicularly to the system, formed what is now known as a fractal set. That is, the distribution of energy levels for small-scale changes in the applied magnetic field recursively repeats patterns seen in the large-scale structure. ^[1] "Gplot", as Hofstadter called the figure, was described as a recursive structure in his 1976 article in Physical Review B , ^[1] written before Benoit Mandelbrot's newly coined word "fractal" was introduced in an English text. Hofstadter also discusses the figure in his 1979 book Gödel, Escher, Bach . The structure became generally known as "Hofstadter's butterfly".

David J. Thouless and his team discovered that the butterfly's wings are characterized by Chern integers, which provide a way to calculate the Hall conductance in Hofstadter's model. ^[5]

Confirmation

A simulation of electrons via superconducting qubits yields Hofstadter's butterfly

In 1997 the Hofstadter butterfly was reproduced in experiments with a microwave guide equipped with an array of scatterers. ^[6] The similarity between the mathematical description of the microwave guide with scatterers and Bloch's waves in the magnetic field allowed the reproduction of the Hofstadter butterfly for periodic sequences of the scatterers.

In 2001, Christian Albrecht, Klaus von Klitzing , and coworkers realized an experimental setup to test Thouless et al.'s predictions about Hofstadter's butterfly with a two-dimensional electron gas in a superlattice potential. ^{[7] [2]}

In 2013, three separate groups of researchers independently reported evidence of the Hofstadter butterfly spectrum in graphene devices fabricated on hexagonal boron nitride substrates. ^{[8] [9] [10]} In this instance the butterfly spectrum results from the interplay between the applied magnetic field and the large-scale moiré pattern that develops when the graphene lattice is oriented with near zero-angle mismatch to the boron nitride.

In September 2017, John Martinis's group at Google, in collaboration with the Angelakis group at CQT Singapore, published results from a simulation of 2D electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field using interacting photons in 9 superconducting qubits. The simulation recovered Hofstadter's butterfly, as expected. ^[11]

In 2021 the butterfly was observed in twisted bilayer graphene at the second magic angle. ^[12]

Theoretical model

Hofstadter butterfly is the graphical solution to Harper's equation, where the energy ratio ${\displaystyle \epsilon }$ is plotted as a function of the flux ratio${\displaystyle 2\pi \alpha }$.

In his original paper, Hofstadter considers the following derivation: ^[1] a charged quantum particle in a two-dimensional square lattice, with a lattice spacing ${\displaystyle a}$, is described by a periodic Schrödinger equation, under a perpendicular static homogeneous magnetic field restricted to a single Bloch band. For a 2D square lattice, the tight binding energy dispersion relation is

${\displaystyle W(\mathbf {k} )=E_{0}(\cos k_{x}a+\cos k_{y}a)={\frac {E_{0}}{2}}(e^{ik_{x}a}+e^{-ik_{x}a}+e^{ik_{y}a}+e^{-ik_{y}a})}$,

where ${\displaystyle W(\mathbf {k} )}$ is the energy function, ${\displaystyle \mathbf {k} =(k_{x},k_{y})}$ is the crystal momentum, and ${\displaystyle E_{0}}$ is an empirical parameter. The magnetic field ${\displaystyle \mathbf {B} =\nabla \times \mathbf {A} }$, where ${\displaystyle \mathbf {A} }$ the magnetic vector potential, can be taken into account by using Peierls substitution, replacing the crystal momentum with the canonical momentum ${\displaystyle \hbar \mathbf {k} \to \mathbf {p} -q\mathbf {A} }$, where ${\displaystyle \mathbf {p} =(p_{x},p_{y})}$ is the particle momentum operator and ${\displaystyle q}$ is the charge of the particle (${\displaystyle q=-e}$ for the electron, ${\displaystyle e}$ is the elementary charge). For convenience we choose the gauge ${\displaystyle \mathbf {A} =(0,Bx,0)}$.

Using that ${\displaystyle e^{ip_{j}a}}$ is the translation operator, so that ${\displaystyle e^{ip_{j}a}\psi (x,y)=\psi (x+a,y)}$, where ${\displaystyle j=x,y,z}$ and ${\displaystyle \psi (\mathbf {r} )=\psi (x,y)}$ is the particle's two-dimensional wave function. One can use ${\displaystyle W(\mathbf {p} -q\mathbf {A} )}$ as an effective Hamiltonian to obtain the following time-independent Schrödinger equation:

${\displaystyle E\psi (x,y)={\frac {E_{0}}{2}}\left[\psi (x+a,y)+\psi (x-a,y)+\psi (x,y+a)e^{-iqBxa/\hbar }+\psi (x,y-a)e^{+iqBxa/\hbar }\right].}$

Considering that the particle can only hop between points in the lattice, we write ${\displaystyle x=na,y=ma}$, where ${\displaystyle n,m}$ are integers. Hofstadter makes the following ansatz: ${\displaystyle \psi (x,y)=g_{n}e^{i\nu m}}$, where ${\displaystyle \nu }$ depends on the energy, in order to obtain Harper's equation (also known as almost Mathieu operator for ${\displaystyle \lambda =1}$):

${\displaystyle g_{n+1}+g_{n-1}+2\cos(2\pi n\alpha -\nu )g_{n}=\epsilon g_{n},}$

where ${\displaystyle \epsilon =2E/E_{0}}$ and ${\displaystyle \alpha =\phi (B)/\phi _{0}}$, ${\displaystyle \phi (B)=Ba^{2}}$ is proportional to the magnetic flux through a lattice cell and ${\displaystyle \phi _{0}=2\pi \hbar /q}$ is the magnetic flux quantum. The flux ratio ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ can also be expressed in terms of the magnetic length ${\textstyle l_{\rm {m}}={\sqrt {\hbar /eB}}}$, such that ${\textstyle \alpha =(2\pi )^{-1}(a/l_{\rm {m}})^{2}}$. ^[1]

Hofstadter's butterfly is the resulting plot of ${\displaystyle \epsilon _{\alpha }}$ as a function of the flux ratio ${\displaystyle \alpha }$, where ${\displaystyle \epsilon _{\alpha }}$ is the set of all possible ${\displaystyle \epsilon }$ that are a solution to Harper's equation.

Solutions to Harper's equation and Wannier treatment

Hofstadter's butterfly phase diagram at zero temperature. The horizontal axis indicates electron density, starting with no electrons from the left. The vertical axis indicates the strength of the magnetic flux, starting from zero at the bottom, the pattern repeats periodically for higher fields. The colors represent the Chern numbers of the gaps in the spectrum, also known as the TKNN (Thouless, Kohmoto, Nightingale and Nijs) integers. Blueish cold colors indicate negative Chern numbers, warm red colors indicate positive Chern numbers, white indicates zero.

Due to the cosine function's properties, the pattern is periodic on ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ with period 1 (it repeats for each quantum flux per unit cell). The graph in the region of ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ between 0 and 1 has reflection symmetry in the lines ${\textstyle \alpha ={\frac {1}{2}}}$ and ${\displaystyle \epsilon =0}$. ^[1] Note that ${\displaystyle \epsilon }$ is necessarily bounded between -4 and 4. ^[1]

Harper's equation has the particular property that the solutions depend on the rationality of ${\displaystyle \alpha }$. By imposing periodicity over ${\displaystyle n}$, one can show that if ${\displaystyle \alpha =P/Q}$ (a rational number), where ${\displaystyle P}$ and ${\displaystyle Q}$ are distinct prime numbers, there are exactly ${\displaystyle Q}$ energy bands. ^[1] For large ${\displaystyle Q\gg P}$, the energy bands converge to thin energy bands corresponding to the Landau levels.

Gregory Wannier showed that by taking into account the density of states, one can obtain a Diophantine equation that describes the system, ^[13] as

${\displaystyle {\frac {n}{n_{0}}}=S+T\alpha }$

where

${\displaystyle n=\int _{-4}^{\epsilon _{\rm {F}}}\rho (\epsilon )\mathrm {d} \epsilon \;;\;n_{0}=\int _{-4}^{4}\rho (\epsilon )\mathrm {d} \epsilon }$

where ${\displaystyle S}$ and ${\displaystyle T}$ are integers, and ${\displaystyle \rho (\epsilon )}$ is the density of states at a given ${\displaystyle \alpha }$. Here ${\displaystyle n}$ counts the number of states up to the Fermi energy, and ${\displaystyle n_{0}}$ corresponds to the levels of the completely filled band (from ${\displaystyle \epsilon =-4}$ to ${\displaystyle \epsilon =4}$). This equation characterizes all the solutions of Harper's equation. Most importantly, one can derive that when ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ is an irrational number, there are infinitely many solution for ${\displaystyle \epsilon _{\alpha }}$.

The union of all ${\displaystyle \epsilon _{\alpha }}$ forms a self-similar fractal that is discontinuous between rational and irrational values of ${\displaystyle \alpha }$. This discontinuity is nonphysical, and continuity is recovered for a finite uncertainty in ${\displaystyle B}$ ^[1] or for lattices of finite size. ^[14] The scale at which the butterfly can be resolved in a real experiment depends on the system's specific conditions. ^[2]

Phase diagram, conductance and topology

The phase diagram of electrons in a two-dimensional square lattice, as a function of a perpendicular magnetic field, chemical potential and temperature, has infinitely many phases. Thouless and coworkers showed that each phase is characterized by an integral Hall conductance, where all integer values are allowed. These integers are known as Chern numbers. ^[2]

See also

• Aubry–André model

References

1. Hofstadter, Douglas R. (1976). "Energy levels and wavefunctions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields". Physical Review B . 14 (6): 2239–2249. Bibcode:1976PhRvB..14.2239H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2239.
2. Avron J, Osadchy D., and Seiler R. (2003). "A topological look at the quantum Hall effect". Physics Today. 53 (8): 38–42. Bibcode:2003PhT....56h..38A. doi: 10.1063/1.1611351 .
3. Harper, P G (1955-10-01). "Single Band Motion of Conduction Electrons in a Uniform Magnetic Field". Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A. 68 (10): 874–878. Bibcode:1955PPSA...68..874H. doi:10.1088/0370-1298/68/10/304. ISSN   0370-1298.
4. Azbel', Mark Ya. (1964). "Energy Spectrum of a Conduction Electron in a Magnetic Field". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics . 19 (3): 634–645.
5. Thouless D., Kohmoto M, Nightngale and M. den-Nijs (1982). "Quantized Hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential". Physical Review Letters. 49 (6): 405–408. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..49..405T. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.405 .
6. Kuhl, U.; Stöckmann, H.-J. (13 April 1998). "Microwave realization of the Hofstadter butterfly". Physical Review Letters . 80 (15): 3232–3235. Bibcode:1998PhRvL..80.3232K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3232.
7. Albrecht, C.; Smet, J. H.; von Klitzing, K.; Weiss, D.; Umansky, V.; Schweizer, H. (2001-01-01). "Evidence of Hofstadter's Fractal Energy Spectrum in the Quantized Hall Conductance". Physical Review Letters. 86 (1): 147–150. Bibcode:2001PhRvL..86..147A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.147. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   11136115.
8. Dean, C. R.; Wang, L.; Maher, P.; Forsythe, C.; Ghahari, F.; Gao, Y.; Katoch, J.; Ishigami, M.; Moon, P.; Koshino, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Watanabe, K.; Shepard, K. L.; Hone, J.; Kim, P. (30 May 2013). "Hofstadter's butterfly and the fractal quantum Hall effect in moiré superlattices". Nature . 497 (7451): 598–602. arXiv: 1212.4783 . Bibcode:2013Natur.497..598D. doi:10.1038/nature12186. PMID   23676673. S2CID   119210000.
9. Ponomarenko, L. A.; Gorbachev, R. V.; Yu, G. L.; Elias, D. C.; Jalil, R.; Patel, A. A.; Mishchenko, A.; Mayorov, A. S.; Woods, C. R.; Wallbank, J. R.; Mucha-Kruczynski, M.; Piot, B. A.; Potemski, M.; Grigorieva, I. V.; Novoselov, K. S.; Guinea, F.; Fal’ko, V. I.; Geim, A. K. (30 May 2013). "Cloning of Dirac fermions in graphene superlattices". Nature . 497 (7451): 594–597. arXiv: 1212.5012 . Bibcode:2013Natur.497..594P. doi:10.1038/nature12187. hdl:10261/93894. PMID   23676678. S2CID   4431176.
10. Hunt, B.; Sanchez-Yamagishi, J. D.; Young, A. F.; Yankowitz, M.; LeRoy, B. J.; Watanabe, K.; Taniguchi, T.; Moon, P.; Koshino, M.; Jarillo-Herrero, P.; Ashoori, R. C. (2013). "Massive Dirac fermions and Hofstadter butterfly in a van der Waals heterostructure". Science . 340 (6139): 1427–1430. arXiv: 1303.6942 . Bibcode:2013Sci...340.1427H. doi:10.1126/science.1237240. PMID   23686343. S2CID   37694594.
11. Roushan, P.; Neill, C.; Tangpanitanon, J.; Bastidas, V. M.; Megrant, A.; Barends, R.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Z.; Chiaro, B.; Dunsworth, A.; Fowler, A.; Foxen, B.; Giustina, M.; Jeffrey, E.; Kelly, J.; Lucero, E.; Mutus, J.; Neeley, M.; Quintana, C.; Sank, D.; Vainsencher, A.; Wenner, J.; White, T.; Neven, H.; Angelakis, D. G.; Martinis, J. (2017-12-01) [2017-09-20]. "Spectroscopic signatures of localization with interacting photons in superconducting qubits" [Spectral signatures of many-body localization with interacting photons]. Science . 358 (6367): 1175–1179. arXiv: 1709.07108 . Bibcode:2017Sci...358.1175R. doi:10.1126/science.aao1401. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   29191906. S2CID   206662292.
12. Lu, Xiaobo; Lian, Biao; Chaudhary, Gaurav; Piot, Benjamin A.; Romagnoli, Giulio; Watanabe, Kenji; Taniguchi, Takashi; Poggio, Martino; MacDonald, Allan H.; Bernevig, B. Andrei; Efetov, Dmitri K. (2021-07-27). "Multiple flat bands and topological Hofstadter butterfly in twisted bilayer graphene close to the second magic angle". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 (30): e2100006118. arXiv: 2006.13963 . Bibcode:2021PNAS..11800006L. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100006118 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   8325360 . PMID   34301893.
13. Wannier, G. H. (1978-08-01). "A Result Not Dependent on Rationality for Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field". Physica Status Solidi B. 88 (2): 757–765. Bibcode:1978PSSBR..88..757W. doi:10.1002/pssb.2220880243.
14. Analytis, James G.; Blundell, Stephen J.; Ardavan, Arzhang (May 2004). "Landau levels, molecular orbitals, and the Hofstadter butterfly in finite systems". American Journal of Physics. 72 (5): 613–618. Bibcode:2004AmJPh..72..613A. doi:10.1119/1.1615568. ISSN   0002-9505.