Information culture

Last updated

Information culture is closely linked with information technology, information systems, and the digital world. It is difficult to give one definition of information culture, and many approaches exist.

Contents

Overview

The literature regarding information culture focuses on the relationship between individuals and information in their work. Curry and Moore [1] are most frequently cited in the information culture literature, and there is consensus of that values accorded to information, and attitudes towards it are indicators of information culture (McMillan et al., 2012; Curry and Moore, 2003; Furness, 2010; Oliver, 2007; Davenport and Prusak, 1997; Widén-Wulff, 2000; Jarvenpaa and Staples, 2001). [2] information culture is a culture that is conducive to effective information management where "the value and utility of information in achieving operational and strategic goals is recognized, where information forms the basis of organizational decision making, and information technology is readily exploited as an enabler for effective information systems". [1] Information culture is a part of the whole organizational culture. It is only by understanding the organisation that progress can be made with information management activities. [3]

Ginman [4] defines information culture as the culture in which the transformation of intellectual resources is maintained alongside the transformation of material resources. Information culture is the environment where knowledge is produced with social intelligence, social interaction and work knowledge. Multinational organizations (MNOs) are characterized by their engagement in global markets. In order to remain competitive in today's global marketplace. [5]

In many organizations, information culture is described as a form of information technology. As Davenport [6] writes, many executives think they solve all information problems with buying IT-equipment. Information culture is about effective information management to use information, not machines, and information technology is just a part of information culture, which has an interactive role in it. [7]

Information culture is the part of organizational culture where evaluation and attitudes towards information depend on the situation in which the organization works. In an organization everyone has different attitudes, but the information profile must be explained, so the importance of information should be realized by executives. The information culture is also about formal information systems (technology), common knowledge, individual information systems (attitudes), and information ethics. [8] information culture does not include written or conscious behavior and what seemingly happening in the organization. Information culture is affected by the behaviors of internal factors of organization more than external factors, which comes in form of information culture, the attitudes and the traditions. Information culture deals with information, information channels, the attitudes, the use and ability to forward or gather information with the environmental circumstances effectively. Knowledge base of any organization can be viewed according to Nonaka's [9] theories about the organizational knowledge production and Cronin & Davenport's [8] theories about the social intelligence. According to these theories it is important to look at the organization information culture how the user uses the information.

Cultural differences need to be understood before information technology developed for an organization in one country can be effectively implemented in an organization in another country. [10] It is well understood that any form of information security technology cannot be properly comprehended and appreciated among user employees without guidelines that focus on the human rather than technical perspective, such as information ethics and national security policy. [11]

A highly developed information culture leads the organization to success and work as a strategic goal that positively associated with organizational practices and performance. Choo et al. [12] looked at information culture as the socially shared patterns of behaviors, norms and values that define the significance and use of information in an organization. Also, scholars like Manuel Castells posits that the information culture transcends the confines of organizations and government participation through policies is relevant for achieving the norms and values. [13] Norms are standards and values are beliefs and together they mold the information behavior as normal that are expected by the people in organization. In so far, information behavior is the reflection of cultural norms and values. Marchand, Kettinger and Rollins [14] identifies six information behaviors and values to profile an organization's information culture:

Information culture typologies

Based on a widely applied construct from Cameron and Quinn [15] that has been used to differentiate organizational culture types and their relationships to organizational effectiveness, Choo [7] develops a typology of information culture. He emphasizes elements from information behavior research. [16] The information culture typologies are characterized by a set of five attributes:

  1. the primary goal of information management
  2. information values and norms
  3. information behaviors in terms of information needs
  4. information seeking
  5. information use

In addition, Choo classifies information culture into four categories:

  1. Relationship-based Culture
  2. Risk-taking Culture
  3. Result-oriented Culture
  4. Rule-following Culture

Relationship-based Culture: information management supports communication, participation, and a sense of identity. Information values and norms emphasize sharing and the proactive use of information. These values promote collaboration and cooperation. The focus is on internal information.

Risk-taking Culture: innovation, creativity, and the exploration of new ideas are encouraged while information is managed. Information values and norms emphasize sharing and the proactive use of information. These values promote innovation, development of new products or capabilities, and the boldness to take the initiative. The focus is on external information. Information is used to identify and evaluate opportunities, and promote entrepreneurial risk-taking.

Result-oriented Culture: information management enables the organization to compete and succeed in its market or sector. Information values and norms call attention to control and integrity: accurate information is valued in order to assess performance and goal attainment. Information is used to understand clients and competitors, and to evaluate results.

Rule-following Culture: information management reinforces the control of internal operations, rules and policies. Information values and norms emphasize control and standardized processes. The focus is on internal information. The organization seeks information about workflows, as well as information about regulatory or accountability requirements. Information is used to control operations, improve efficiency, and provide accountability.

Information culture in government organization

Information governance is beginning to gain traction within organizations, particularly where compliance is a concern, and Davenport and Prusak's models of governance are useful tools to inform the design of information governance. Most public sector organizations in Canada have informal information governance models (or policies) [2] Davenport, Eccles and Prusak [17] have developed four models of information governance, to inform a progression of control. They describe the levels of information governance using political terms: information federalism, information feudalism, information monarchy, and information anarchy. Their observations allow to evaluate the effectiveness of their governance models in terms of information quality, efficiency, commonality, and access.

Oliver's [18] research on three case study organizations found several factors that characterized and differentiated the information cultures were associated with the organizational information management framework, as well as attitudes and values accorded to information. Compliance requirements for the management of information have a significant place in shaping information culture.

Research suggests that poor compliance to formal information governance policies [19] reinforces the fact that sound knowledge and records management practices are often neglected.

Information culture affects support, enthusiasm and cooperation of staff and management of information, asserts Curry and Moore. [1] If such an information culture is critical to the successful management of information assets, then it becomes vital to develop and nurture the commitment from both management and staff at all levels. Curry and Moore [1] have developed an exploratory model of information culture, which included components needed within a strong information culture: effective communication flows, cross-organizational partnerships, co-operative working practices and open access to relevant information, management of information systems in accordance with business strategy, and clear guidelines and documentation for information and data management. Trust is a characteristic that has more recently come to the forefront in literature. The social dynamics between supervisors and workers relies upon trust, or the lack of trust, which will also have an effect on information sharing.

Information culture and information use

Curry and Moore [1] define information culture as "a culture in which the value and utility of information in achieving operational and strategic success is recognised, where information forms the basis of organizational decision making and information technology is readily exploited as an enabler for effective information systems". Information culture is manifested in the organization's values, norms, and practices that affect how information is perceived, created and used. [20] The six information behaviors and values identified by Marchand [14] to characterize the information culture of an organization are information integrity, formality, control, sharing, transparency, and proactiveness. A part of culture that deals specifically with information —the perceptions, values, and norms that people have about creating, sharing, and applying information— has a significant effect on information use outcomes. It is possible to systematically identify behaviors and values that describe an organization's information culture.

It is possible to systematically identify behaviours and values that characterize an organization's information culture, and that this characterization could be helpful in understanding the information use effectiveness of all sorts of organizations, including private businesses, government agencies, and publicly funded institutions such as libraries and museums. A study by Choo and others suggested that organizations might do well to remember that in the rush to implement strategies and systems, information values and information culture will always have a defining influence on how people share and use information. [21]

Information culture and organizational culture

In industrialised countries, most of the diseases and injuries are related to mental health problems and are the main reason of employees absenteeism. There are number of risk factors or stressors that may cause psychological strain and ill health, resulted in occupational stress interventions that occur in isolation, independent of organizational culture. Paying more attention to organizational culture paves the way for a contextualized analysis of stress and distress in the workplace. An integrated framework is used in which the association between organizational culture and mental health is mediated by the work organization conditions that qualify the task environment like information management, information sharing and decision making. Organizational cultures somehow intertwined with the information culture. Information culture is a part of organizational Culture as values, behaviour of employees in the organisation somehow effect the information culture.

The framework links organizational culture to mental health via work organization conditions and is inscribed within the functionalist perspective that views culture as an organizational construct that influences and shapes organizational characteristics. [22] Organizational culture is conceptualized in terms of the four quadrants of the Quinn and Rohrbaugh [23] typology, which are:

  1. Group Culture
  2. Developmental Culture
  3. Hierarchical Culture
  4. Rational Culture

By knowing these cultures, organisations can easily adopt the relevant culture according to their work related conditions. Although work organization conditions and organizational culture are closely intertwined, they should not be confounded. [24] [25] Just as societal cultural values would influence organizationally relevant outcomes (Taras, Kirkman, & Steel, 2010), organizational culture might influence work organization conditions. Schein [25] views organizational culture as a multilayered construct that includes artifacts, values, social ideals, and basic assumptions. Artifacts such as behaviors, structures, processes, and technology form a first layer. At a more latent level, organizational culture is noticed in the values and social ideals shared by members of the organization (i.e., ideology of the organization). These values and ideals are revealed in symbolic mechanisms such as myths, rituals, stories, legends, and a codified language, as well as in corporate objectives, strategies, management philosophies, and in the justifications given for these.

Group Culture encourages employees to make suggestions regarding how to improve their own work and overall performance. As a result, the group culture creates an empowering environment in which individuals perceive they have autonomy and influence. Consequently, in the Group Culture, individuals recognize that their work has meaning and that they have the skills to carry it out. [15] Considering also that information sharing is an important feature of employee participation, informational support from leaders is likely to be high in the group culture. Group Culture tends to develop task designs that promote the use of skills and decision authority, which are protective factors and also implement work organization conditions that promote social support whether from colleagues or from supervisors, which thereby have a beneficial influence on employee mental health.

Developmental Culture is helpful to develop decentralised work design that promotes the use of skills and decision authority with benefit to employee mental health. In Developmental Culture, employees are likely to enjoy significant rewards that could have beneficial effects on employee mental health.

Hierarchical Culture is helpful to promote social support and thereby play a beneficial role in employee mental health. In this type of culture, it could well be seniority that determines both compensation and career advancement, giving employees a certain level of job security that could prove beneficial for employee mental health.

Rational Culture with clear performance indicators and measurements is likely to minimize conflicting demands that could be beneficial for employee mental health. So these integrated model can help the organisations and the managers to choose the suitable culture. Integration of organizational culture into occupational stress models is a fruitful avenue to achieve a deeper understanding of occupational mental health problems in the workplace and this framework can also helpful to serve as a starting point for multilevel occupational stress research.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knowledge management</span> Process of creating, sharing, using and managing the knowledge and information of an organization

Knowledge management (KM) is the collection of methods relating to creating, sharing, using and managing the knowledge and information of an organization. It refers to a multidisciplinary approach to achieve organizational objectives by making the best use of knowledge.

Organization development (OD) is the study and implementation of practices, systems, and techniques that affect organizational change. The goal of which is to modify a group's/organization's performance and/or culture. The organizational changes are typically initiated by the group's stakeholders. OD emerged from human relations studies in the 1930s, during which psychologists realized that organizational structures and processes influence worker behavior and motivation.

Organizational learning is the process of creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge within an organization. An organization improves over time as it gains experience. From this experience, it is able to create knowledge. This knowledge is broad, covering any topic that could better an organization. Examples may include ways to increase production efficiency or to develop beneficial investor relations. Knowledge is created at four different units: individual, group, organizational, and inter organizational.

Organizational culture refers to culture related to organizations including schools, universities, not-for-profit groups, government agencies, and business entities. Alternative terms include corporate culture and company culture. The term corporate culture emerged in the late 1980s and early 1990s. It was used by managers, sociologists, and organizational theorists in the 1980s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knowledge transfer</span> Sharing knowledge for problem solving

Knowledge transfer is the sharing or disseminating of knowledge and the providing of inputs to problem solving. In organizational theory, knowledge transfer is the practical problem of transferring knowledge from one part of the organization to another. Like knowledge management, knowledge transfer seeks to organize, create, capture or distribute knowledge and ensure its availability for future users. It is considered to be more than just a communication problem. If it were merely that, then a memorandum, an e-mail or a meeting would accomplish the knowledge transfer. Knowledge transfer is more complex because:

Information ecology is the application of ecological concepts for modeling the information society. It considers the dynamics and properties of the increasingly dense, complex and important digital informational environment. "Information ecology" often is used as metaphor, viewing the information space as an ecosystem, the information ecosystem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Business process re-engineering</span> Business management strategy

Business process re-engineering (BPR) is a business management strategy originally pioneered in the early 1990s, focusing on the analysis and design of workflows and business processes within an organization. BPR aims to help organizations fundamentally rethink how they do their work in order to improve customer service, cut operational costs, and become world-class competitors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theory of reasoned action</span> Psychological theory

The theory of reasoned action aims to explain the relationship between attitudes and behaviors within human action. It is mainly used to predict how individuals will behave based on their pre-existing attitudes and behavioral intentions. An individual's decision to engage in a particular behavior is based on the outcomes the individual expects will come as a result of performing the behavior. Developed by Martin Fishbein and Icek Ajzen in 1967, the theory derived from previous research in social psychology, persuasion models, and attitude theories. Fishbein's theories suggested a relationship between attitude and behaviors. However, critics estimated that attitude theories were not proving to be good indicators of human behavior. The TRA was later revised and expanded by the two theorists in the following decades to overcome any discrepancies in the A–B relationship with the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and reasoned action approach (RAA). The theory is also used in communication discourse as a theory of understanding.

Competence is the set of demonstrable characteristics and skills that enable and improve the efficiency or performance of a job. Competency is a series of knowledge, abilities, skills, experiences and behaviors, which leads to effective performance in an individual's activities. Competency is measurable and can be developed through training.

A community of practice (CoP) is a group of people who "share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly". The concept was first proposed by cognitive anthropologist Jean Lave and educational theorist Etienne Wenger in their 1991 book Situated Learning. Wenger then significantly expanded on the concept in his 1998 book Communities of Practice.

Knowledge policies provide institutional foundations for creating, managing, and using organizational knowledge as well as social foundations for balancing global competitiveness with social order and cultural values. Knowledge policies can be viewed from a number of perspectives: the necessary linkage to technological evolution, relative rates of technological and institutional change, as a control or regulatory process, obstacles posed by cyberspace, and as an organizational policy instrument.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Onboarding</span> Management jargon for introducing new employees to employers policies and practices

Onboarding or organizational socialization is the American term for the mechanism through which new employees acquire the necessary knowledge, skills, and behaviors to become effective organizational members and insiders. In standard English, this is referred to as "induction". In the United States, up to 25% of workers are organizational newcomers engaged in onboarding process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Culture change</span> Term in public policy

Culture change is a term used in public policy making that emphasizes the influence of cultural capital on individual and community behavior. It has been sometimes called repositioning of culture, which means the reconstruction of the cultural concept of a society. It places stress on the social and cultural capital determinants of decision making and the manner in which these interact with other factors like the availability of information or the financial incentives facing individuals to drive behavior.

Air Force Knowledge Now (AFKN) is a web-based collaborative environment developed by Triune Group for the U.S. Air Force (USAF). From 1999 to 2012, AFKN grew to more than 19,000 Communities of Practice (CoPs) and 400,000 members. In 2004, Air Force CIO John M. Gilligan designated AFKN the Air Force Center of Excellence for Knowledge Management, making it the USAF’s only certified and accredited enterprise-wide knowledge management program. By focusing on social, behavioral and cultural aspects of knowledge sharing, AFKN evolved beyond traditional knowledge management systems, which focused on capturing information through technology.

Knowledge sharing is an activity through which knowledge is exchanged among people, friends, peers, families, communities, or within or between organizations. It bridges the individual and organizational knowledge, improving the absorptive and innovation capacity and thus leading to sustained competitive advantage of companies as well as individuals. Knowledge sharing is part of the knowledge management process.

A knowledge organization is a management idea, describing an organization in which people use systems and processes to generate, transform, manage, use, and transfer knowledge-based products and services to achieve organizational goals.

Website governance is an organization's structure of staff and the technical systems, policies and procedures to maintain and manage a website. Website governance applies to both Internet and Intranet sites.

Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) is employee's behavior that goes against the legitimate interests of an organization. This behavior can harm the organization, other people within it, and other people and organizations outside it, including employers, other employees, suppliers, clients, patients and citizens. It has been proposed that a person-by-environment interaction (the relationship between a person's psychological and physical capacities and the demands placed on those capacities by the person's social and physical environment.) can be utilized to explain a variety of counterproductive behaviors. For instance, an employee who is high on trait anger is more likely to respond to a stressful incident at work with CWB.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to social science:

Text and conversation is a theory in the field of organizational communication illustrating how communication makes up an organization. In the theory's simplest explanation, an organization is created and defined by communication. Communication "is" the organization and the organization exists because communication takes place. The theory is built on the notion, an organization is not seen as a physical unit holding communication. Text and conversation theory puts communication processes at the heart of organizational communication and postulates, an organization doesn't contain communication as a "causal influence", but is formed by the communication within. This theory is not intended for direct application, but rather to explain how communication exists. The theory provides a framework for better understanding organizational communication.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Curry, A. and Moore, C. (2003). Assessing information culture – an exploratory model. International Journal of Information Management, vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 91-110
  2. 1 2 Wright, T. (2013). Information culture in a government organization. Records Management Journal, 23(1), 14-36
  3. ↑ Oliver, G. (2011), Organizational Culture for Information Managers. Chandos Publishing
  4. ↑ Ginman, M. (1988). Information culture and business performance. IATUL Quarterly, 2(2), 93–106
  5. ↑ Guo, Zixiu, and John D’Ambra. The Influence Of National And Organizational Cultures On Technology Use. Journal of Global Information Management 17.4 (2009): 74-94.
  6. ↑ Davenport, T. H. (1994). Saving IT's Soul: Human-Centered Information Management. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 119-131
  7. 1 2 Choo, C.W. (2013). Information culture and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of information management, 33, 775-779.
  8. 1 2 Cronin, B. and Davenport, E. (1993). Social Intelligence. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 28, 3-44
  9. ↑ Nonaka, I. (1994) A Dynamic Theory of Organisational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37
  10. ↑ Leidner, Dorothy E et al. (1997). A Multicultural Perspective Of The Impact Of EIS On Organizational Intelligence, Decision Making And Structure. Fontainebleau: INSEAD.
  11. ↑ Choi, SeEun; Martins, Jorge Tiago; Bernik, Igor (December 2018). "Information security: Listening to the perspective of organisational insiders". Journal of Information Science. 44 (6): 752–767. doi:10.1177/0165551517748288. ISSN   0165-5515. S2CID   53237428.
  12. ↑ Choo, C. W., Bergeron, P., Detlor, B., & Heaton, L. (2008). Information culture and information use: An exploratory study of three organizations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59(5), 792-804
  13. ↑ Castells, Manuel. The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
  14. 1 2 Marchand, D., Kettinger, W., & Rollins, J. (2001). Information orientation: The link to business performance. New York : Oxford University Press
  15. 1 2 Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework . Reading, MA : Jossey Bass
  16. ↑ Vick, T. E., Nagano, M. S., Popadiuk, S. (2015). Information culture and its influences in knowledge creation: Evidence from university teams engaged in collaborative innovation projects. International Journal of Information Management. 35(3), 292-298
  17. ↑ Davenport, T.H., Eccles, R.G. and Prusak, L. (1992). Information politics. Sloan Management Review, Fall,53-65
  18. ↑ Oliver, G. (2011). Organizational Culture for Information Managers. Chandos Publishing
  19. ↑ Hoke, G.J. (2011). Records life cycle: a cradle-to-grave metaphor. Information Management Journal, 45(5), 28-32
  20. ↑ Choo, C.W. Information management for the intelligent organization: the art of scanning the environment. 3rd ed. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc., 2002. xx, 325 p. ISBN   1-57387-125-7.
  21. ↑ Choo, C. W., Furness, C., Paquette, S., van den Berg, H., Detlor, B., Bergeron, P. et al., (2006). Working with information: Information management and culture in a professional services organization. Journal of Information Science, 32(6), 491–510.
  22. ↑ O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1996) (Sorensen, 2002). Culture as social control: Corporations, cults and commitment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 157–200
  23. ↑ Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 363–377
  24. ↑ Detert, J. R., Schroeder, R. G., & Mauriel, J. J. (2000). A framework for linking culture and improvement initiatives in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 25, 850–863
  25. 1 2 Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.