Jus gentium

Last updated August 13, 2023

The ius gentium or jus gentium (Latin for "law of nations") is a concept of international law within the ancient Roman legal system and Western law traditions based on or influenced by it. The ius gentium is not a body of statute law nor a legal code,^[1] but rather customary law thought to be held in common by all gentes ("peoples" or "nations") in "reasoned compliance with standards of international conduct".^[2]

Following the Christianization of the Roman Empire, canon law also contributed to the European ius gentium.^[3] By the 16th century, the shared concept of the ius gentium disintegrated as individual European nations developed distinct bodies of law, the authority of the Pope declined, and colonialism created subject nations outside the West.^[4]

Roman law

In classical antiquity, the ius gentium was regarded as an aspect of natural law (ius naturale), as distinguished from civil law (ius civile).^[5] The jurist Gaius defined the ius gentium as what "natural reason has established among all peoples":^[6]

Every people (populus) that is governed by statutes and customs (leges et mores) observes partly its own peculiar law and partly the common law of all mankind. That law which a people established for itself is peculiar to it and is called ius civile (civil law) as being the special law of that civitas (state), while the law that natural reason establishes among all mankind is followed by all peoples alike, and is called ius gentium (law of nations, or law of the world) as being the law observed by all mankind. Thus the Roman people observes partly its own peculiar law and partly the common law of all mankind.
— Gaius, G. Inst. 1.1^[7]

As a form of natural law, the ius gentium was regarded as "innate in every human being", a view that was consonant with Stoic philosophy.^[8] Cicero ^[9] distinguished between things that are written and those that are unwritten but upheld by the ius gentium or the mos maiorum , "ancestral custom".^[10] In his treatise De officiis , he regards the ius gentium as a higher law of moral obligation binding human beings beyond the requirements of civil law.^[11] A person driven into exile, for instance, lost his legal standing as a Roman citizen, but was supposed to retain the basic protections extended to all human beings under the ius gentium.^[12]

The 2nd-century Roman jurist Ulpian, however, divided law into three branches: natural law, which existed in nature and governed animals as well as humans; the law of nations, which was distinctively human; and, civil law, which was the body of laws specific to a people.^[13] Slavery, for instance, was supported by the ius gentium, even though under natural law all are born free (liberi).^[14] In this tripartite division of law, property rights might be considered a part of the ius gentium, but not of natural law.^[15] Hermogenianus, a Roman jurist of the second half of the 3rd century, described the ius gentium as comprising wars, national interests, kingship and sovereignty, rights of ownership, property boundaries, settlements, and commerce, "including contracts of buying and selling and letting and hiring, except for certain contractual elements distinguished through ius civile".^[16] The ius gentium was thus in practice important in facilitating commercial law.^[17]

War, peace and the gentes

The theory and terminology of private law was far more developed among the Romans than that of international law.^[18] The earliest form of international law was religious and pertained to the concept of the "just war" ( bellum iustum ), which should only be undertaken with a ritualized declaration of war by the fetial priests.^[19] Foreign ambassadors were protected by the ius gentium, and it was a religious violation to harm an envoy.^[20]

While the terms of peace treaties might be said to fall broadly within the ius gentium, there was no framework of international law per se with which a treaty had to conform. As gentes were brought under Roman rule, Roman law became in effect international law.^[21] Local laws remained in force as long as they did not come into conflict with Roman law; this compatibility was understood as reflecting the underlying ius gentium.^[22] The praetor assigned to foreign affairs ( praetor peregrinus ) is thought by many scholars to have played an important role in extending Roman civil law to the gentes.^[23] Laws originally pertaining to matters of contract law among Roman citizens, such as property transfers and manumission, were thus "internationalized" among the gentes.^[24] Questions of "international law" might arise in relation to individual grants of citizenship, and whether these accorded with treaty.^[25] Because there was no generally accepted principle of international law, controversy might also arise over whether "Rome was bound by an agreement concluded by a field commander without approval of the Senate—typically an armistice concluded in distress and on unfavourable terms."^[26]

A key passage pertaining to what Romans understood as "international law" is presented by Livy, as spoken by an envoy of King Antiochus:^[27]

There were three kinds of treaties (foedera, singular foedus ), he said, by which states and kings concluded friendships (amicitiae): one, when in time of war terms (leges) were imposed upon the conquered; for when everything was surrendered to him who was the more powerful in arms, it is the victor's right and privilege to decide what of the conquered's property he wishes to confiscate; the second, when states that are equally matched in war conclude peace and friendship on terms of equality; under these conditions demands for restitution are made and granted by mutual agreement, and if the ownership of any property has been rendered uncertain by the war, these questions are settled according to the rules of traditional law or the convenience of each party; the third exists when states that have never been at war come together to pledge mutual friendship in a treaty of alliance; neither party gives or accepts conditions; for that happens when a conquering and a conquered party meet.^[28]

Terminology

Terminology associated with Roman international law was non-specialized but included:^[29]

amicitia , "a relation of friendship without any further concrete engagements, i.e. the mere exclusion of hostilities; … it could be concluded by a treaty but also without".^[30]
societas , although sometimes a mere synonym for amicitia, is "an obligation to peace and neutrality" with "a duty to grant military support".^[31]
foedus , originally a sacred oath made by a fetial priest on behalf of the Roman people, who will suffer a "self-damnation" if they violate the treaty.^[32]
pax, "both the state of peace and the means to achieve it by treaty".^[33]
indutiae, "cease-fires" that "do not end the war as a whole, but interrupt the hostilities only temporarily".^[34]
deditio , surrender, with "the inherent normative expectation that the victor would in any case spare the inhabitants' lives".^[35]
- dediticius , a person who became a subject of the Roman Empire through a deditio; dediticii were excluded from the universal citizenship extended to all free inhabitants of the empire under the Constitutio Antoniniana .^[36]
fides, "trustworthiness, loyalty, credibility", was a quality the Romans wanted to pride themselves for upholding, including respect for the law and fides in foreign relations.^[37]

Medieval Europe

In the Middle Ages, the ius gentium derived from canon law in addition to Roman legal theory.^[38] In late antiquity, Isidore of Seville (c. 560–636), enumerated the principles of the ius gentium, focusing on foedera pacis, "peace treaties":^[39]

Ius gentium is occupation, construction, fortification, wars, captivity, the right of regaining citizenship after captivity, slavery, treaties, peace, armistice, the inviolability of ambassadors, the prohibition of mixed marriages; and it is the ius gentium because nearly every nation uses it.^[40]

Related Research Articles

The Peace of Westphalia is the collective name for two peace treaties signed in October 1648 in the Westphalian cities of Osnabrück and Münster. They ended the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) and brought peace to the Holy Roman Empire, closing a calamitous period of European history that killed approximately eight million people. Holy Roman Emperor Ferdinand III, the kingdoms of France and Sweden, and their respective allies among the princes of the Holy Roman Empire, participated in the treaties.

Roman law is the legal system of ancient Rome, including the legal developments spanning over a thousand years of jurisprudence, from the Twelve Tables, to the Corpus Juris Civilis ordered by Eastern Roman emperor Justinian I. Roman law forms the basic framework for civil law, the most widely used legal system today, and the terms are sometimes used synonymously. The historical importance of Roman law is reflected by the continued use of Latin legal terminology in many legal systems influenced by it, including common law.

The judiciary is the system of courts that adjudicates legal disputes/disagreements and interprets, defends, and applies the law in legal cases.

Hugo Grotius, also known as Huig de Groot and Hugo de Groot, was a Dutch humanist, diplomat, lawyer, theologian, jurist, statesman, poet and playwright. A teenage prodigy, he was born in Delft and studied at Leiden University. He was imprisoned in Loevestein Castle for his involvement in the controversies over religious policy of the Dutch Republic, but escaped hidden in a chest of books that was transported to Gorinchem. Grotius wrote most of his major works in exile in France.

A peace treaty is an agreement between two or more hostile parties, usually countries or governments, which formally ends a state of war between the parties. It is different from an armistice, which is an agreement to stop hostilities; a surrender, in which an army agrees to give up arms; or a ceasefire or truce, in which the parties may agree to temporarily or permanently stop fighting.

The Eighty Years' War or Dutch Revolt was an armed conflict in the Habsburg Netherlands between disparate groups of rebels and the Spanish government. The causes of the war included the Reformation, centralisation, taxation, and the rights and privileges of the nobility and cities.

Citizenship in ancient Rome was a privileged political and legal status afforded to free individuals with respect to laws, property, and governance. Citizenship in Ancient Rome was complex and based upon many different laws, traditions, and cultural practices. There existed several different types of citizenship, determined by one's gender, class, and political affiliations, and the exact duties or expectations of a citizen varied throughout the history of the Roman Empire.

The School of Salamanca is the Renaissance of thought in diverse intellectual areas by Spanish theologians, rooted in the intellectual and pedagogical work of Francisco de Vitoria. From the beginning of the 16th century the traditional Catholic conception of man and of his relation to God and to the world had been assaulted by the rise of humanism, by the Protestant Reformation and by the new geographical discoveries and their consequences. These new problems were addressed by the School of Salamanca. The name refers to the University of Salamanca, where de Vitoria and other members of the school were based.

The Peace of Münster was a treaty between the Lords States General of the Seven United Netherlands and the Spanish Crown, the terms of which were agreed on 30 January 1648. The treaty, negotiated in parallel to, but not part of, the Peace of Westphalia, is a key event in Dutch history, marking the formal recognition of the independent Dutch Republic and the end of the Thirty Years' War and the Eighty Years' War.

The history of international law examines the evolution and development of public international law in both state practice and conceptual understanding. Modern international law developed out of Renaissance Europe and is strongly entwined with the development of western political organisation at that time. The development of European notions of sovereignty and nation states would necessitate the development of methods for interstate relations and standards of behaviour, and these would lay the foundations of what would become international law. However, while the origins of the modern system of international law can be traced back 400 years, the development of the concepts and practises that would underpin that system can be traced back to ancient historical politics and relationships thousands of years old. Important concepts are derived from the practice between Greek city-states and the Roman law concept of ius gentium. These principles were not universal however. In East Asia, political theory was based not on the equality of states, but rather the cosmological supremacy of the Emperor of China.

The Westphalian system, also known as Westphalian sovereignty, is a principle in international law that each state has exclusive sovereignty over its territory. The principle developed in Europe after the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, based on the state theory of Jean Bodin and the natural law teachings of Hugo Grotius. It underlies the modern international system of sovereign states and is enshrined in the United Nations Charter, which states that "nothing ... shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state."

International law is the set of rules, norms, and standards generally recognised as binding between states. It establishes normative guidelines and a common conceptual framework for states across a broad range of domains, including war and diplomacy, economic relations, and human rights. International law differs from state-based domestic legal systems in that it is primarily, though not exclusively, applicable to states, rather than to individuals, and operates largely through consent, since there is no universally accepted authority to enforce it upon sovereign states. States may choose to not abide by international law, and even to breach a treaty but such violations, particularly of peremptory norms, can be met with disapproval by others and in some cases coercive action ranging from diplomatic and economic sanctions to war.

Jus inter gentes, is the body of treaties, U.N. conventions, and other international agreements. Originally a Roman law concept, it later became a major part of public international law. The other major part is jus gentium, the Law of Nations. Jus inter gentes, literally, means "law between the peoples".

Ius or Jus in ancient Rome was a right to which a citizen (civis) was entitled by virtue of his citizenship (civitas). The iura were specified by laws, so ius sometimes meant law. As one went to the law courts to sue for one's rights, ius also meant justice and the place where justice was sought.

Ius naturale is Latin for natural right, the laws common to all beings. Roman jurists wondered why the ius gentium was in general accepted by all people living in the Empire. Their conclusion was that these laws made sense to a reasonable person and thus were followed. All laws which would make sense to a normal person were called ius naturale.

<i>De jure belli ac pacis</i> Book by Hugo Grotius

De iure belli ac pacis is a 1625 book written by Hugo Grotius on the legal status of war that is regarded as a foundational work in international law. The work takes up Alberico Gentili's De jure belli of 1598, as demonstrated by Thomas Erskine Holland. The book was written in Latin and published in Paris.

In ancient Rome, the dediticii or peregrini dediticii were a class of free provincials who were neither slaves nor citizens holding either full Roman citizenship as cives or Latin rights as Latini.

International legal theory comprises a variety of theoretical and methodological approaches used to explain and analyse the content, formation and effectiveness of public international law and institutions and to suggest improvements. Some approaches center on the question of compliance: why states follow international norms in the absence of a coercive power that ensures compliance. Other approaches focus on the problem of the formation of international rules: why states voluntarily adopt international legal norms, that limit their freedom of action, in the absence of a world legislature. Other perspectives are policy oriented; they elaborate theoretical frameworks and instruments to criticize the existing rules and make suggestions on how to improve them. Some of these approaches are based on domestic legal theory, others are interdisciplinary, while others have been developed expressly to analyse international law.

Randall Christoph Herman Lesaffer is a Belgian historian of international law. He has been professor of legal history at KU Leuven since 1998 and at Tilburg University since 1999, where he also served as dean of Tilburg Law School from 2008 to 2012. He currently serves as the head of the Department of Roman Law and Legal History at the Faculty of Law and Criminology at KU Leuven. His work focuses on the Early Modern Age.

The guarantors of the imperial constitution or guarantor powers were those states that were, by treaty, obligated to defend the constitution of the Holy Roman Empire. The three guarantor powers were Sweden, France and Russia.

References

↑ R.W. Dyson, Natural Law and Political Realism in the History of Political Thought (Peter Lang, 2005), vol. 1, p. 127.
↑ David J. Bederman, International Law in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 85.
↑ Randall Lesaffer, introduction to Peace Treaties and International Law in European History from the Late Middle Ages to World War One (Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 5, 13.
↑ Randall Lesaffer, "Peace Treaties from Lodi to Westphalia", in Peace Treaties and International Law in European History, p. 34.
↑ Brian Tierney, The Idea of Natural Rights (Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2002, originally published 1997 by Scholars Press for Emory University), pp. 66–67; Dyson, Natural Law and Political Realism, p. 236.
↑ Quod vero naturalis ratio inter omnes homines constituit … vocator ius gentium, Digest 1.1.9; Tierney, The Idea of Natural Rights, p. 136.
↑ Quoted in Laurens Winkel, "The Peace Treaties of Westphalia as an Instance of the Reception of Roman Law", in Peace Treaties and International Law in European History, p. 225.
↑ Winkel, "The Peace Treaties of Westphalia", p. 225; Marcia L. Colish, The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages (Brill, 1980), p. 360 et passim.
↑ Cicero, Partitiones oratoriae 37.130.
↑ A. Arthur Schiller, Roman Law: Mechanisms of Development (Mouton, 1978), pp. 254–255.
↑ Cicero, De officiis 3.17.69; Colish, The Stoic Tradition, p. 150.
↑ Clifford Ando, Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011), p. 29.
↑ Digest 1.1.1.4; Tierney, The Idea of Natural Rights, p. 136.
↑ Digest 1.1.4; Tierney, The Idea of Natural Rights, p. 136.
↑ Digest 1.1.5; Tierney, The Idea of Natural Rights, pp. 136–137.
↑ Digest 1.1.5; Winkel, "The Peace Treaties of Westphalia", pp. 225–226.
↑ Adda B. Bozeman, Politics and Culture in International History from the Ancient Near East to the Opening of the Modern Age (Transaction Publishers, 2010, 2nd ed., originally published 1960 by Princeton University Press), p. 210.
↑ Christian Baldus, "Vestigia pacis. The Roman Peace Treaty: Structure or Event?" in Peace Treaties and International Law in European History, pp. 112–113.
↑ David J. Bederman, International Law in Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 231–239 et passim.
↑ Sextus Pomponius (2nd century AD), in his commentary on the ius civile of Q. Mucius Scaevola: "If someone strikes an ambassador of the enemy ( legatus hostium), he is regarded as having acted against the law of nations (ius gentium), because ambassadors are regarded as sacred ( sanctus "); Daniel Peretz, "The Roman Interpreter and His Diplomatic and Military Roles", Historia 55.4 (2006), p. 454; Bederman, International Law in Antiquity, pp. 104–105, 114–115.
↑ After the Battle of Pydna in 168 BC, no Western power was equal to that of Rome. Persia was thereafter the only other major power with which Rome was in regular contact. Baldus, Vestigia pacis, pp. 111–112; Olivier Hekster, Rome and Its Empire, AD 193–284 (Edinburgh University Press, 2008), p. 47.
↑ Bozeman, Politics and Culture in International History, pp. 208–209.
↑ T. Corey Brennan, The Praetorship in the Roman Republic (Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 134; Dyson, Natural Law and Political Realism, p. 127; Bozeman, Politics and Culture in International History, p. 208.
↑ Schiller, Roman Law, p. 529; Bozeman, Politics and Culture in International History, pp. 206–208.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, pp. 135–136.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 132.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, pp. 114–115.
↑ Livy, 34.57.7–9.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 113.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 120.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 120.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, pp. 120–121.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 122.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 122.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 122.
↑ Hekster, Rome and Its Empire, p. 47.
↑ Baldus, Vestigia pacis, p. 140.
↑ Lesaffer, introduction to Peace Treaties and International Law in European History, p. 5.
↑ Karl-Heinz Ziegler, "The Influence of Medieval Roman Law on Peace Treaties," in Peace Treaties and International Law in European History, p. 147.
↑ Isidore, Etymologies 5.6 (ius gentium est sedium occupatio, aedificatio, munitio, bella, captivitates, servitutes, postliminia, foedera pacis, indutiae, legatorum non violandorum religio, conubia inter alienigenas prohibita. Et inde ius gentium, quia eo iure omnes fere gentes utuntur); Winkel, "The Peace Treaties of Westphalia," p. 226.