Maritime Court of Ontario

Last updated

The Maritime Court of Ontario was an admiralty court in Ontario. It was created in 1877 by a federal statute. The Exchequer Court of Canada succeeded the Maritime Court by a statute passed in 1891. The Exchequer Court continued in 1971 as the Federal Court of Canada.

Contents

History

Beginning in the 1860s, Canadian commentators began to see the need for an admiralty court with jurisdiction over commerce on the Great Lakes. [1] Vice-admiralty courts had existed for many years in the Maritimes and Quebec. The Vice-Admiralty Court of Quebec was established in 1764. When Quebec was divided into Upper and Lower Canada, the court's jurisdiction was limited to Lower Canada. [2] Early legislative proposals would have conferred admiralty jurisdiction on the Supreme Court of Canada but the court, created by statute in 1875, was not given such jurisdiction. [3]

In 1877, the parliament of Canada established the Maritime Court of Ontario by the Maritime Jurisdiction Act, 1877. [2] [4] The statute came into force on July 7, 1877. [5]

In 1891, the Exchequer Court of Canada became Canada's admiralty court pursuant to the Admiralty Act, 1891, SC 1891 (54–55 Vict), c 29. [6] [7] The Maritime Court of Ontario was accordingly abolished; its territory became known as the "Toronto Admiralty District" of the new court. [8] The Exchequer Court was continued and reorganized in 1971 as the Federal Court of Canada. [6]

American counterparts

The constitution of the United States vests judicial power over all admiralty and maritime cases in federal courts. Beginning in 1845, [9] United States district courts had exercised maritime jurisdiction by proceedings in rem , both when a right to process in rem was given by general admiralty law, as interpreted by American courts; and when the right arose under state legislation. [10]

Jurisdiction

The Maritime Court of Ontario had all jurisdiction exercised by then-existing British vice-admiralty courts in similar matters. It could hear both contract and tort claims. Its jurisdiction extended to proceedings in rem and in personam related to navigation, shipping, trade, or commerce on any river, lake, canal, or inland water located in whole or in part in Ontario. [11]

Practice and procedure

When the Maritime Court of Ontario was established, common law and equity had not yet been fused in Ontario. The rules of practice in the Maritime Court were modelled on the general orders of the Court of Chancery of Upper Canada. [12]

The judges of the Maritime Court were the county judges of the county of York sitting in Toronto. [13]

Appeals lay directly from the Maritime Court of Ontario to the Supreme Court of Canada. [13]

Notes

  1. Stone 2002, pp. 514, 517.
  2. 1 2 Cox 1888, p. 1.
  3. Bushnell 1997, p. 73.
  4. Maritime Jurisdiction Act, 1877, 40 Vict, c 21
  5. Stone 2002, p. 519.
  6. 1 2 Stone 2002, p. 513.
  7. Admiralty Act, 1891, SC 1891 (54–55 Vict), c 29
  8. Bushnell 1997, p. 76.
  9. Stone 2002, p. 514.
  10. Cox 1888, p. 2.
  11. O'Sullivan 1879, pp. 194–195.
  12. Cox 1888, p. 8.
  13. 1 2 O'Sullivan 1879, p. 195.

Sources

Related Research Articles

Admiralty law or maritime law is a body of law that governs nautical issues and private maritime disputes. Admiralty law consists of both domestic law on maritime activities, and private international law governing the relationships between private parties operating or using ocean-going ships. While each legal jurisdiction usually has its own legislation governing maritime matters, the international nature of the topic and the need for uniformity has, since 1900, led to considerable international maritime law developments, including numerous multilateral treaties.

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

Law of Canada Overview of the law of Canada

The legal system of Canada is pluralist: its foundations lie in the English common law system, the French civil law system and Indigenous law systems developed by the various Indigenous peoples.

<i>Constitution Act, 1867</i> Primary constitutional document of Canada

The Constitution Act, 1867 is a major part of the Constitution of Canada. The Act created a federal dominion and defines much of the operation of the Government of Canada, including its federal structure, the House of Commons, the Senate, the justice system, and the taxation system. The British North America Acts, including this Act, were renamed in 1982 with the patriation of the Constitution ; however, it is still known by its original name in United Kingdom records. Amendments were also made at this time: section 92A was added, giving provinces greater control over non-renewable natural resources.

The Federal Court of Canada, which succeeded the Exchequer Court of Canada in 1971, was a national court of Canada that had limited jurisdiction to hear certain types of disputes arising under the federal government's legislative jurisdiction. Originally composed of two divisions, the Appellate Division and the Trial Division, in 2003 the Court was split into two separate Courts, the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal. The jurisdiction and powers of the two courts remained largely unchanged from the predecessor divisions.

The court system of Canada forms the judicial branch of government, formally known as "The Queen on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

In Canadian law, a reference question or reference case is a submission by the federal or a provincial government to the courts asking for an advisory opinion on a major legal issue. Typically the question concerns the constitutionality of legislation.

<i>In rem</i> jurisdiction Type of jurisdiction

In rem jurisdiction is a legal term describing the power a court may exercise over property or a "status" against a person over whom the court does not have in personam jurisdiction. Jurisdiction in rem assumes the property or status is the primary object of the action, rather than personal liabilities not necessarily associated with the property.

The Mutiny Acts were an almost 200-year series of annual Acts passed by the Parliament of England, the Parliament of Great Britain, and the Parliament of the United Kingdom for governing, regulating, provisioning, and funding the English and later British Army.

<i>R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

R v Eastern Terminal Elevator Co is an early constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Constitution's Trade and Commerce power.

The maritime lien is one of three in rem claims capable of being brought under UK Admiralty Law. Whilst being a common law instrument, it has been codified under s.21(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 along with s.21(2) and s.21(4), its statutory counterparts.

Judicature Act is a term which was used in the United Kingdom for legislation which related to the Supreme Court of Judicature.

County Courts Act is a stock short title used for legislation in the United Kingdom and Victoria relating to county courts.

Credit Valley Railway

The Credit Valley Railway was a railway located in Ontario, Canada from Toronto to St. Thomas. Chartered in 1871 by Ontario railway magnate George Laidlaw, it operated as an independent company until 1883 when it was leased by the Ontario and Quebec Railway, a Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) operating company building a network of lines in southern Ontario.

Piracy Act 1850 United Kingdom legislation

The Piracy Act 1850, sometimes called the Pirates Repeal Act, is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It relates to proceedings for the condemnation of ships and other things taken from pirates and creates an offence of perjury in such proceedings.

Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883 United Kingdom legislation

The Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Act 1883 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The Bill for this Act was the Statute Law Revision and Civil Procedure Bill.

Canadian maritime law

Canadian maritime law is based on the field of "Navigation and Shipping" vested in the Parliament of Canada by virtue of s. 91(10) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

<i>Attorney General for Quebec v. Queen Insurance Company</i>

Attorney General for Quebec v. Queen Insurance Company is a Canadian constitutional law decision dealing with the taxation and licensing powers of the provinces under the federal-provincial division of powers.

Sir Walter Gibson Pringle Cassels was a Canadian lawyer and judge. He was the first President of the Exchequer Court of Canada from 1920 until his death in 1923.