Minimizer

Last updated

In linguistics, a minimizer is a word or phrase that denotes a very small quantity which is used to reinforce negation. For example, "red cent" in the sentence "I'm not paying him a red cent" (meaning, "I'm not paying him any money") is a minimizer.

Contents

Minimizers are usually analysed as a subclass of negative polarity items, and are often limited to negative contexts. [1] For example, statements like "I paid him a red cent" or "I care a wit" would be considered unacceptable. In English and other languages, minimizers constitute the largest and most productive class of negative polarity items. [2]

History

The term minimizer was coined by linguist Dwight Bolinger in his 1972 book Degree Words, where he described them as "partially stereotyped equivalents of any". [3] [4] The phenomenon had previously been remarked upon by other scholars as far back as August Friedrich Pott in 1859. [5]

Quirk et al. use the term in their 1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language , classifying minimizers as a subclass of "downtoners" (alongside "approximators", "compromisers", and "diminishers"). Unusually, they include in this category adverbs like barely and hardly which themselves encode negation. [6]

Polarity

Minimizers are usually treated as a kind of negative polarity item, though this point of view has been challenged. [7] Under negation, the minimizer is interpreted metaphorically as the absence of even a minimal quantity – i.e. nothing at all. [1]

Like other negative polarity items, minimizers can, in addition to negative contexts, also occur in other non-affirmative contexts such as questions and conditionals, as in: [8]

Do you have a drop of water to spare?
If you tell a soul, your career is over.

Positive contexts

Some minimizers cannot be used in affirmative contexts (except perhaps for deliberate comedic effect), for example: [9]

* I slept a wink last night.
* I give a hoot about your poem.

Other terms used as minimizers may simply refer literally to a small fixed quantity when used in positive contexts, such as: [9]

I paid him a dime.
She said a word.

Range of meanings and origins

Minimizers are a highly productive class, and new examples can be readily formed from a variety of domains. Early surveys of minimizers across a range of living and dead languages found that some recurring categories included: [10]

Another category of minimizers is superlative expressions such as "the foggiest idea" or "the slightest inkling". [11]

Some minimizers are limited to very specific, fixed idiomatic verb phrases (e.g. "move a muscle", "lift a finger", "sleep a wink"), whereas others are highly versatile, such as the semantically bleached shit:

I'm not paying him shit.
I'm not saying shit without a lawyer present.
You can search my car, but you're not going to find shit.

Other minimizers are limited to representing only a certain kind of quantity. For example, word may only be used with predicates which take an object of a linguistic nature: [12]

She didn't speak a word.
I don't believe a word of your story.
I can't understand a word of Italian.
# He doesn't care a word about his colleagues.

(The # symbol marks the last sentence as infelicitous.)

Role in language change

Minimizers are one linguistic element which may develop over time into a marker of sentential negation. [13] For example, negation in French is usually marked with the pre-verbal particle ne and the negative marker pas, as in Je ne sais pas ("I don't know"). pas derives from the Latin passum ("step"), hence "ne... pas" derives from a construction meaning "not a step". In early French, pas could be interchanged with other minimizer nouns such as goutte ("drop") or mie ("crumb"). Similar developments have occurred in other Romance languages. In this way, minimizers have been implicated in Jespersen's cycle, in that a language with pre-verbal negation may develop toward obligatory pre- and post-verbal negation by the grammaticalization of a minimizer which initially is used optionally for emphasis or some other pragmatic purpose. [14]

Vulgar minimizers

A particular class of English minimizers based on vulgar or profane language have been observed to have a distinctive property. Like other minimizers, they can appear in non-affirmative contexts with a meaning of "anything", but they can also be used in affirmative contexts, where they seem to take on the meaning "nothing". For example, the following pair of sentences have identical meanings:

He doesn't know jack shit about politics.
He knows jack shit about politics.

Other English examples in this category (which Paul Postal gives the label "SQUAT") include dick, diddley-squat, fuck-all, and shit. [15] The same phenomenon has been observed for some vulgarisms in Catalan (e.g. una merda, "a shit"; un carall, "a penis") and Spanish (e.g. tres cojones, "three testicles"; un mojón, "a turd"). [16]

Some uses of vulgar intensifiers serve the same semantic function as minimizers, as for example in the statement, "I'm not paying him a frickin cent" (compare "I'm not paying him a red cent").

See also

Citations

  1. 1 2 OHN 2020, 22.4.
  2. ↑ Horn 2001, p. 401.
  3. ↑ Horn 2001, p. 400.
  4. ↑ Bolinger 1972, pp. 120–121.
  5. ↑ Horn 2001, p. 1972.
  6. ↑ Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman. pp. 597–600. ISBN   0-582-51734-6. OCLC   11533395.
  7. ↑ OHN 2020, 23.1.
  8. ↑ Tubau 2015, p. 740.
  9. 1 2 Horn 2001, pp. 399–400.
  10. ↑ Horn 2001, pp. 452–453.
  11. ↑ Hoeksema 2001, p. 175.
  12. ↑ Hoeksema 2001, p. 179.
  13. ↑ OHN 2020, 9.3.
  14. ↑ OHN 2020, 7.2.1, 9.4.
  15. ↑ Postal 2004, p. 159.
  16. ↑ OHN 2020, 23.5.

Related Research Articles

Euphemism Innocuous word or expression used in place of one that may be found offensive

A euphemism is an innocuous word or expression used in place of one that is deemed offensive or suggests something unpleasant. Some euphemisms are intended to amuse, while others use bland, inoffensive terms for concepts that the user wishes to downplay. Euphemisms may be used to mask profanity or refer to topics some consider taboo such as disability, sex, excretion, or death in a polite way.

French grammar is the set of rules by which the French language creates statements, questions and commands. In many respects, it is quite similar to that of the other Romance languages.

Double negative Grammatical construction

A double negative is a construction occurring when two forms of grammatical negation are used in the same sentence. Multiple negation is the more general term referring to the occurrence of more than one negative in a clause. In some languages, double negatives cancel one another and produce an affirmative; in other languages, doubled negatives intensify the negation. Languages where multiple negatives affirm each other are said to have negative concord or emphatic negation. Portuguese, Persian, French, Russian, Greek, Spanish, Old English, Italian, Afrikaans, Hebrew are examples of negative-concord languages. This is also true of many vernacular dialects of modern English. Chinese, Latin, German, Dutch, Japanese, Swedish and modern Standard English are examples of languages that do not have negative concord. Typologically, it occurs in a minority of languages.

The imperative mood is a grammatical mood that forms a command or request.

Pleonasm is redundancy in linguistic expression, such as "black darkness" or "burning fire". It is a manifestation of tautology by traditional rhetorical criteria, and might be considered a fault of style. Pleonasm may also be used for emphasis, or because the phrase has become established in a certain form. Tautology and pleonasm are not consistently differentiated in literature.

<i>De Interpretatione</i> Work by Aristotle

De Interpretatione or On Interpretation is the second text from Aristotle's Organon and is among the earliest surviving philosophical works in the Western tradition to deal with the relationship between language and logic in a comprehensive, explicit, and formal way. The work is usually known by its Latin title.

An interrogative clause is a clause whose form is typically associated with question-like meanings. For instance, the English sentence "Is Hannah sick?" has interrogative syntax which distinguishes it from its declarative counterpart "Hannah is sick". Interrogative clauses can occur embedded, as in "Paul knows who is sick", where the interrogative clause "who is sick" serves as complement of the embedding verb "know".

In linguistics, a polarity item is a lexical item that is associated with affirmation or negation. An affirmation is a positive polarity item, abbreviated PPI or AFF. A negation is a negative polarity item, abbreviated NPI or NEG.

In linguistic semantics, a downward entailing (DE) propositional operator is one that constrains the meaning of an expression to a lower number or degree than would be possible without the expression. For example, "not," "nobody," "few people," "at most two boys." Conversely, an upward-entailing operator constrains the meaning of an expression to a higher number or degree, for example "more than one." A context that is neither downward nor upward entailing is non-monotone, such as "exactly five."

Polarity may refer to:

The grammar of Modern Greek, as spoken in present-day Greece and Cyprus, is essentially that of Demotic Greek, but it has also assimilated certain elements of Katharevousa, the archaic, learned variety of Greek imitating Classical Greek forms, which used to be the official language of Greece through much of the 19th and 20th centuries. Modern Greek grammar has preserved many features of Ancient Greek, but has also undergone changes in a similar direction as many other modern Indo-European languages, from more synthetic to more analytic structures.

Yesandno, or word pairs with similar words, are expressions of the affirmative and the negative, respectively, in several languages, including English. Some languages make a distinction between answers to affirmative versus negative questions and may have three-form or four-form systems. English originally used a four-form system up to and including Early Middle English and Modern English has reduced to a two-form system consisting of 'yes' and 'no'. It exists in many facets of communication, such as: eye blink communication, head movements, Morse Code, and sign language. Some languages, such as Latin, do not have yes-no word systems.

In linguistics, a yes–no question, also known as a polar question or a general question is a question whose expected answer is one of two choices, one that provides an affirmative answer to the question versus one that provides a negative answer to the question. Typically, in English, the choices are either "yes" or "no". Yes–no questions present an exclusive disjunction, namely a pair of alternatives of which only one is a felicitous answer. In English, such questions can be formed in both positive and negative forms

Jespersens Cycle

Jespersen's Cycle (JC) is a series of processes in historical linguistics, which describe the historical development of the expression of negation in a variety of languages, from a simple pre-verbal marker of negation, through a discontinuous marker and in some cases through subsequent loss of the original pre-verbal marker. The pattern was formulated in Otto Jespersen's 1917 book Negation in English and Other Languages, and named after him in Swedish linguist Östen Dahl's 1979 article Typology of Sentence Negation.

English articles Definite article "the" and indefinite articles "a" and "an" (and sometimes the word "some")

The articles in English are the definite article the and the indefinite articles a and an. The definite article is used when the speaker believes that the listener knows the identity of the noun's referent. The indefinite article is used when the speaker believes that the listener does not have to be told the identity of the referent. No article is used in some noun phrases.

Positive anymore is the use of the adverb anymore in an affirmative context. While any more is typically a negative/interrogative polarity item used in negative, interrogative, or hypothetical contexts, speakers of some dialects of English use it in positive or affirmative contexts, with a meaning similar to nowadays or from now on. The difference between negative anymore and positive anymore can be characterized as follows:

In linguistics, veridicality is a semantic or grammatical assertion of the truth of an utterance.

The aggressive is a verb construction that occurs in the Finnish language, especially in emotional outbursts. It expresses negation or rejection and resembles a negative clause, but it lacks the Finnish negative auxiliary. Instead, the aggressive is often marked with an obscene word, which tends to be seen as a distinctive feature of the construction. The aggressive has playfully been described as a grammatical mood by the inventor of the term, but the construction operates on the syntactical level and morphologically the verb is in a regular mood. It is only found in the vernacular, with the written examples almost always being an example of code-switching.

In linguistics and grammar, affirmation and negation are ways in which grammar encodes positive and negative polarity into verb phrases, clauses, or other utterances. An affirmative (positive) form is used to express the validity or truth of a basic assertion, while a negative form expresses its falsity. For example, the affirmative sentence "Jane is here" asserts that it is true that Jane is currently located near the speaker. Conversely, the negative sentence "Jane is not here" asserts that it is not true that Jane is currently located near the speaker.

In linguistics, negative raising is a phenomenon that concerns the raising of negation from the embedded or subordinate clause of certain predicates to the matrix or main clause. The higher copy of the negation, in the matrix clause, is pronounced; but the semantic meaning is interpreted as though it were present in the embedded clause.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.