Missile Defense Agency

Missile Defense Agency

Agency overview
Formed	January 2002;22 years ago (2002-01)
Preceding agencies	Strategic Defense Initiative Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
Jurisdiction	Federal government of the United States
Headquarters	Headquarters Command Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia [1]
Employees	Approx. 2500 (3000 with non-MDA support personnel) (2016) [2]
Annual budget	$9.187 billion (FY 2021) [3]
Agency executives	Lt Gen Heath Collins, Director Laura M. DeSimone, Executive Director [4]
Parent agency	Department of Defense
Website	www.mda.mil

The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) is a component of the United States government's Department of Defense responsible for developing a comprehensive defense against ballistic missiles. It had its origins in the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) which was established in 1983 by Ronald Reagan and which was headed by Lt. General James Alan Abrahamson. Under the Strategic Defense Initiative's Innovative Sciences and Technology Office ^{[5] [6] [7]} headed by physicist and engineer Dr. James Ionson, ^{[8] [9] [10] [11]} the investment was predominantly made in basic research at national laboratories, universities, and in industry. These programs have continued to be key sources of funding for top research scientists in the fields of high-energy physics, advanced materials, nuclear research, supercomputing/computation, and many other critical science and engineering disciplines—funding which indirectly supports other research work by top scientists, and which was most politically viable to fund from appropriations for national defense. ^[12] It was renamed the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization in 1993, and then renamed the Missile Defense Agency in 2002. ^[13] The current director is U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Jon A. Hill. ^[14]

Rapid changes in the strategic environment due to the rapid dissolution of the Soviet Union led, in 1993, to Bill Clinton focusing on theater ballistic missiles and similar threats, and renaming it the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization, BMDO. With another change to a more global focus made by George W. Bush, in 2002 the organization became the Missile Defense Agency.

The Missile Defense Agency is partially or wholly responsible for the development of several ballistic missile defense (BMD) systems, including the Patriot PAC-3, Aegis BMD, THAAD and the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system with a cost of $194 billion. ^[15] They also led the development of numerous other projects, including the Multiple Kill Vehicle and the newer Multi-Object Kill Vehicle, the Kinetic Energy Interceptor and the Airborne Laser. As the inheritor of the SDI and BMDO work, the MDA continues to fund fundamental research in high-energy physics, supercomputing/computation, advanced materials, and many other science and engineering disciplines. ^[12]

Mission statement

THAAD Anti-ballistic missile launcher

The MDA currently publishes the following mission statement:

"The Missile Defense Agency's (MDA) mission is to develop and deploy a layered Missile Defense System to defend the United States, its deployed forces, allies, and friends from missile attacks in all phases of flight." ^[16]

The National Defense Authorization Act is cited as the original source of the MDA's mission:

"It is the policy of the United States to maintain and improve an effective, robust layered missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United States, allies, deployed forces, and capabilities against the developing and increasingly complex ballistic missile threat with funding subject to the annual authorization of appropriations and the annual appropriation of funds for National Missile Defense. National Defense Authorization Act (Public Law 114–328)" ^[16]

International mission

Arrow 3 is an exoatmospheric hypersonic anti-ballistic missile, jointly funded, developed and produced by Israel and the United States.

Ballistic Missile Defense Systems (BMDS) must be capable of operating in different regions of the world to ensure the success of the MDA mission. The International Strategy was approved by the MDA Director in 2007. The general strategy for international efforts is: ^[17]

Outreach: Communicate the importance of missile defense by promoting worldwide BMDS by sharing information with allies and partners.

Capability and Interoperability: Identify and integrate U.S and partner systems to create global missile defense system. Promote interoperability among allies.

Technology: Identify and evaluate possible international technology in support of BMDS capabilities.

Investment: Identify and execute investment opportunities with allies and partners.

Workforce: Shape a qualified workforce to execute the MDA International Strategy.

As of 2017 MDA was working on facilities in Germany, Romania, Poland, Japan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. ^[18]

Potential threats against the United States

Ballistic missile systems using advanced liquid- or solid-propellant propulsion are becoming more mobile, accurate and capable of striking targets over longer distances and are proliferating worldwide. ^{[19] : pp.18–19/61}

• Iran currently has short- and medium- range missiles with guidance systems. Iran's launch of a medium range, solid fuel ballistic missile demonstrates its ability to hit targets in Israel and southern Europe. ^[20] Iran also successfully launched the Safir Space Launch Vehicle on Feb 2, 2009. It was then speculated that development of an ICBM was not far behind. Intelligence reports that a missile could have been built sometime between 2010 and 2015 perhaps using help from Russian and North Korean technology. ^{[21] [22]} Iran also recently developed a hypersonic ballistic missile in 2022, which can move fifteen times the speed of sound and can reach U.S. and European targets, as well as the U.S. mainland, in 15 minutes. ^[23]
• North Korea currently deploys a Nodong ballistic missile capable of hitting Japan and South Korea, and is developing a new intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) which could reach Guam and the Aleutian Islands. They also successfully demonstrated the staging and separation technologies required to launch a Taepo-Dong 2 ICBM, which has the capability to reach the United States. ^[24] The Taepodong missile was first tested in 2006, and failed 40 seconds into midflight. North Korean missiles are notoriously unreliable, and many of the DPRK's missile tests have failed, including the most recent Taepodong-2 launches in 2009 and 2012, ^[25] and a failed launch of the BM25 Musudan in 2016. ^[26] On 1 January 2017, North Korea announced its final preparation for a test of an ICBM, for the first time. ^[27] On 6 March 2017, North Korea launched four missiles from Tongchang-ri, ^[28] a known long-range missile site at 7:36 a.m. local time, one of which landed in the Sea of Japan, with the remaining three missiles landing in Japan's economic zone. ^[29] On July 4, 2017 North Korea launched a ballistic missile that had the potential to be an ICBM. It flew through space and landed in the Sea of Japan. "The launch continues to demonstrate that North Korea poses a threat to the United States and our allies," a Pentagon statement said. ^[30]
• Syria has been identified as a host for short-range ballistic missiles (as it acquires equipment from North Korea and Iran). ^{[19] : p.19/61}

Defense of Guam

MDA will be using multiple technologies to defend Guam. ^{[31] [32] [33] [34]}

Categories

MIM-104 Patriot surface-to-air missile (SAM) with anti-ballistic missile capabilities.

MDA divides its systems into four phases: boost; ascent; mid-course; and terminal. Each of these corresponds to a different phase of the threat ballistic missile flight regime. Each phase offers different advantages and disadvantages to a missile defense system (see missile defense classified by trajectory phase), and the geography of each defended area dictates the types of systems which can be employed. The resultant flexible and layered defense approach concept is believed to improve overall defense effectiveness. The more opportunities a system has to neutralize a threat (e.g., by shooting down a missile), the better the chance of success.^{[ citation needed ]}

Activities have also been categorized as fulfilling the goals of one of five "blocks". For example, "block 4.0" was stated as "Defend Allies and Deployed Forces in Europe from Limited Iranian Long-Range Threats and Expand Protection of U.S. Homeland". It included the US missile defense complex in Poland to be constructed, and the European Mid-course Radar (EMR), currently located at the Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site at Kwajalein Atoll, which was to have been modified and relocated to the Czech Republic. ^{[35] [36]}

On 17 September 2009, the Obama administration scrapped the "block 4.0" plan, in favor of a new so-called "European Phased Adaptive Approach" (EPAA). ^[37]

Boost phase

Can intercept all ranges of missiles, but the missile boost phase is only from one to five minutes. It is the best time to track the missile because it is bright and hot. The missile defense interceptors and sensors must be in close proximity to the launch, which is not always possible. This is the most desirable interception phase because it destroys the missile early in flight at its most vulnerable point and the debris will typically fall on the launching nations' territory.

Ascent phase

This is the phase after powered flight but before the apogee. It is significantly less challenging than boost phase intercepts, less costly, minimizes the potential impact of debris, and reduces the number of interceptors required to defeat a raid of missiles.

Midcourse phase

This phase begins after the booster burns out and begins coasting in space. This can last as long as 20 minutes. Any debris remaining will burn up as it enters the atmosphere. Ground-based missile defense systems can defend from long-range and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in this phase. Mobile elements can defend against medium and short ranged missiles in midcourse.

Terminal phase

This phase is the last chance to intercept the warhead. This contains the least-desirable Interception Point (IP) because there is little room for error and the interception will probably occur close to the defended target. ^[17]

Defenses

Boost phase defense

Research and development:

• Kinetic Energy Interceptor (KEI) – In December 2003, MDA awarded a contract to Northrop Grumman for developing and testing. It will have to be launched from a location not too far from the launch site of the target missile (and is therefore less suitable against large countries), it has to be fired very soon after launch of the target, and it has to be very fast itself (6 km/s). In 2009, the Department of Defense and MDA determined the technological issues were excessive and cancelled the program, allocating no funding for it in its later budget submission. ^[38]
• Boeing YAL-1 Airborne Laser (ABL) – Team ABL proposed and won the contract for this system in 1996. A high-energy laser mounted on a converted 747 airliner was used to intercept a test target in January 2010, ^[39] and the following month, successfully destroyed two test missiles. ^[40] While the program has been cancelled due to concerns about its practicality with present technology (while successful the system was still extremely short ranged, likely needing to fly in heavily defended space to make an interception) the YAL-1 served to demonstrate the potential of such a system. The capabilities of being deployed rapidly to any part of the world and of intercepting a large number of missiles would make a future system extremely attractive.
• Network Centric Airborne Defense Element (NCADE) – On September 18, 2008 Raytheon announced it had been awarded a $10 million contract to continue research and development of NCADE, a missile defense system based on the AIM-120 AMRAAM. ^[41]

One can distinguish disabling the warheads and just disabling the boosting capability. The latter has the risk of "shortfall": damage in countries between the launch site and the target location.

See also APS report.

Ascent phase defense

Research and development:

• Ascent phase intercept (API) – Emerging intercept technologies are being developed and designed to defeat launched missiles in their ascent phase.^{[ citation needed ]} This phase is after the boost phase and prior to the threat missile's apogee (midcourse). The Ascent phase intercept program is still classified so there is little information on it.

Midcourse (ballistic) phase defense

In use:

• Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD)
• Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System (Aegis BMD)

Research and development:

• Multiple Kill Vehicle (MKV, originally Miniature Kill Vehicle): the Department of Defense has canceled the MKV program for the time being. ^[42]

Hypersonic glide phase defense

Research and development:

This section included material from United_States_Army_Futures_Command

By 2021, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) realized that it almost had a countermeasure to hypersonic boost-glide weapons, by using existing data on the adversary hypersonic systems which were gathered from existing US satellite and ground-based sensors. ^[43] MDA then fed this data into its existing systems models, and concluded that the adversary hypersonic weapon's glide phase offered the best chance for MDA to intercept it. ^[44] MDA next proffered a request for information (RFI) from the defense community for building interceptors (denoted the GPI —glide phase interceptor) against the glide phase of that hypersonic weapon. ^[44] GPIs would be guided by Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensors (HBTSS). ^{[45] [46]} These GPI interceptors could first be offered to the Navy for Aegis to intercept using the C2BMC, ^[47] and later to the Army for THAAD to intercept using IBCS. ^{[44] [48] [49]}

Terminal phase defense

In use:

• Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
• PATRIOT Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3)
• Arrow missile, a joint effort between the U.S. and Israel

Research and development:

• Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS), co-developmental program of the United States Department of Defense, Germany and Italy.

List of directors

No.	Director		Term			Service branch
	Portrait	Name	Took office	Left office	Duration
Director, Strategic Defense Initiative Organization
1		Abrahamson, James Alan Lieutenant General James A. Abrahamson (born 1933)	March 27, 1984	January 31, 1989	4 years, 310 days	U.S. Air Force
2		Monahan, George Lennox Jr.Lieutenant General George L. Monahan Jr. (born 1933)	February 1, 1989	June 30, 1990	1 year, 149 days	U.S. Air Force
3		Cooper, Henry F. Ambassador Henry F. Cooper (born 1936)	July 10, 1990	January 20, 1993	2 years, 194 days	U.S. Foreign Service
Director, Ballistic Missile Defense Organization
4		O'Neill, Malcolm RossLieutenant General Malcolm R. O'Neill (born 1940)	November 22, 1993	August 1, 1996	2 years, 253 days	U.S. Army
5		Lyles, Lester L.Lieutenant General Lester L. Lyles (born 1946)	August 1, 1996	May 28, 1999	2 years, 300 days	U.S. Air Force
6		Kadish, Ronald T.Lieutenant General Ronald T. Kadish (born 1948)	June 14, 1999	January 2, 2002	2 years, 202 days	U.S. Air Force
Director, Missile Defense Agency
6		Kadish, Ronald T.Lieutenant General Ronald T. Kadish (born 1948)	January 2, 2002	July 2, 2004	2 years, 182 days	U.S. Air Force
7		Obering, Henry Anthony IIILieutenant General Henry A. Obering III (born c. 1954)	July 2, 2004	November 21, 2008	4 years, 142 days	U.S. Air Force
8		O'Reilly, Patrick J.Lieutenant General Patrick J. O'Reilly (born c. 1959)	November 21, 2008	November 19, 2012	3 years, 364 days	U.S. Army
9		Syring, James D. Vice Admiral James D. Syring (born 1963)	November 19, 2012	June 16, 2017	4 years, 209 days	U.S. Navy
10		Greaves, Samuel A.Lieutenant General Samuel A. Greaves (born c. 1963)	June 26, 2017	May 31, 2019	1 year, 339 days	U.S. Air Force
11		Hill, Jon AnthonyVice Admiral Jon A. Hill (born 1963)	May 31, 2019	July 31, 2023	4 years, 61 days	U.S. Navy
-		Williams, Douglas L.Rear Admiral (lower half) Douglas L. Williams Acting	August 1, 2023	December 5, 2023	126 days	U.S. Navy
12		Collins, HeathLieutenant General Heath A. Collins (born c. 1971)	December 5, 2023	Incumbent	185 days	U.S. Air Force

See also

• Ground-Based Interceptor#Next generation interceptor (NGI)
• Joint Functional Component Command for Integrated Missile Defense
• United States Strategic Command
• National Missile Defense

References

1. "MDA Breaks Ground on New Headquarters Facility" (PDF).
2. Missile Defense Agency Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act (NoFEAR) Fiscal Year 2016 Report (PDF) (Report). Missile Defense Agency. 2016. p. 1. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
3. Missile Defense Agency Budget Estimates Overview Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 (PDF) (Report). Missile Defense Agency. 2020. p. 1, 15. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
4. "MDA Leadership". mda.mil. Missile Defense Agency. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
5. "SDIO Funds Research". MIT: The Tech. November 5, 1985. Archived from the original on August 8, 2012. Retrieved May 25, 2018.
6. "Special Presentation: Innovative Science and Technology Programs". SPIE – Digital Library. June 3, 1988. doi:10.1117/12.947548.
7. "Star War's Inc". Inc. Magazine. April 1987.
8. Goodwin, Irwin (June 1988). "Washington's Ins & Outs: Ionson and Mense Leave SDIO". Physics Today. 41 (6): 53. Bibcode:1988PhT....41f..53G. doi:10.1063/1.2811448.
9. "Low Profile for SDI Work on Campus". The Scientist Magazine. May 1988.
10. "Ionson Counters SDI Dispute". MIT: The Tech. November 1985. Archived from the original on 2012-08-08. Retrieved 2018-05-25.
11. "Ionson Defends SDI Program". MIT: The Tech. October 1985. Archived from the original on 2012-06-16. Retrieved 2018-05-25.
12. 85-25: National Policy on Transfer of Scientific, Technical and Engineering Information, Security Innovation for Estate Protection
13. "MDA History". mda.mil. January 23, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
14. "Missile Defense Agency Completes Change of Responsibility Ceremony". www.mda.mil (Press release). Fort Belvoir, Virginia: Missile Defense Agency. May 31, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
15. Hitchens, Theresa (2023-05-18). "Watchdog slams Missile Defense Agency for delivery, testing shortfalls in 2022". Breaking Defense. Retrieved 2023-05-25.
16. MDA (2019). Our Mission. Retrieved on 2019-12-21 from https://www.mda.mil/about/mission.html.
17. "Testing: Building Confidence" (PDF). Missile Defense Agency. 2009. Retrieved 2009-12-23.^{[ permanent dead link ]}
18. "New US Missile Defence Agency Bases To Be Constructed Around World". www.defenseworld.net. Digitalwriters Media Pvt. Ltd. 24 May 2017. Retrieved 25 May 2017.
19. "Ballistic Missile Defense Review, 26 Jan 2010" (PDF). defense.gov. 26 January 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 March 2021. Retrieved 22 December 2018.
20. "Iran tests longest range missiles". BBC News. 2009-09-28. Retrieved 2009-12-23.
21. Hildreth, Steven A. (2008-07-21). "Iran's Ballistic Missile Programs: An Overview". Congressional Research Service. Retrieved 2009-12-23.
22. "U.S. says Iran rocket test breaches U.N. resolution". yahoo.com. 27 July 2017. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
23. Motamedi, Maziar. "Iran has a hypersonic missile. What does that mean?". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2023-12-03.
24. "North Korea's missile programme". BBC News. 2009-05-27. Retrieved 2009-12-23.
25. "The 100th Missile Defense Brigade: A decade of transformation and mission success". army.mil. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
26. On North Korea’s failed Musudan launch Archived 2018-11-06 at the Wayback Machine accessdate=2016-06-03
27. PM Abe: North Korea launched four ballistic missiles .nytimes.com/2017/01/01/world/asia/north-korea-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-test-kim-jong-un.html Choe Sang-Hun, (1 Jan 2017) "North Korea Will Test Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, Kim Says" New York Times ^{[ permanent dead link ]}
28. PM Abe: North Korea launched four ballistic missiles ^{[ dead link ]} accessdate=2017-03-05
29. Washington Post North Korea launches another missile, perhaps one that can reach U.S. accessdate=2017-03-05
30. Barbara Starr and Ryan Browne (4 July 2017). "As US, SK drill, Tillerson seeks action on NK". CNN. Retrieved 2017-07-06.
31. Ashley Roque (16 March 2023) Missile Defense Agency details evolving, ‘incremental’ vision for Guam air defenses C2BMC; IBCS; LRDR, AN/TPY-6, LTAMDS, Sentinel Radars; Aegis Ashore in trailers, THAAD, IFPC Inc 2 using AIM-9X Sidewinder +2nd missile TBD;
32. DoD (14 Mar 2023) Missile Defense Agency Officials Hold a Press Briefing on President Biden's Fiscal 2024 Missile Defense Budget
33. Colin Demarest (28 Mar 2023) Electronic warfare is 'new frontier' for US Missile Defense Agency ^{[ permanent dead link ]} PPBE FY24: $10.9 billion; FY23: $9.6 billion; FY22: $8.9 billion
34. Micah Hanks (3 Apr 2023) BREAKTHROUGH BALLISTIC MISSILE INTERCEPT DEMONSTRATED BY U.S. MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY IN AEGIS SYSTEM TEST FTM-31Ea "first Aegis Baseline 9 Weapon System (9.C2.0, or BMD 5.1) intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile with the upgraded SM-6 Dual" salvo of Standard Missile-6 Dual IIs, also called 'RIM-174 Standard Extended Range Active Missile' ERAM
35. "Ballistic Missile Defense System". GlobalSecurity. Retrieved 2008-11-07.
36. G. Lewis and T. Postol (May–June 2008). "The European missile defense folly". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists . 64 (2): 33. Bibcode:2008BuAtS..64b..32L. doi:10.2968/064002009.
37. "United States European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) and NATO Missile Defense". U.S. Department of State. 2011-05-03. Retrieved 2013-07-05.
38. "Kinetic Energy Interceptors Program Element 0603886C Budget Item Justification" (PDF). May 2009.
39. Airborne Laser (ABL) 2010 Archived 2010-01-28 at the Wayback Machine . US Missile Defense Agency, January 10, 2010. Retrieved: January 25, 2010.
40. "U.S. successfully tests airborne laser on missile". Reuters. Feb 12, 2010.
41. "Raytheon Awarded $10 million to Develop New Missile Defense Interceptor". Raytheon. Sep 18, 2008.
42. "President's Budget Submission for Program Element 0603894C" (PDF). Apr 27, 2009.
43. Paul McLeary (18 Dec 2019) MDA Kickstarts New Way To Kill Hypersonic Missiles HBTSS is 'Space sensor layer'
44. Jen Judson (13 Aug 2021) Missile Defense Agency dials up the speed in quest for hypersonic interceptor
45. John L. Dolan, Richard K. Gallagher & David L. Mann (23 April 2019) Hypersonic Weapons – A Threat to National Security Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor (HBTSS)
    • Kris Osborn (16 December 2019) Pentagon Advances New Technology to Destroy Hypersonic Missile Attacks HBTSS will "establish a continuous 'track' on approaching hypersonic missiles"
    • Melanie Marlowe (8 April 2020) Three obstacles are slowing space sensors for hypersonic threats Continuous tracking is needed to maintain custody of a hypersonic threat before its disposition.
    • David Brennan (27 Jan 2021) Pentagon Orders Hypersonic Missile Trackers Amid Russia, China Arms Race HBTSS awards to L3Harris; Northrup Grumman
46. Theresa Hitchens (24 February 2020) 2021 Budget Will Finally Fully Fund Next-Gen OPIR, Says Roper Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS) replacement: three satellites in Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO) and two satellites in a polar orbit
47. Jen Judson (20 Nov 2021) Here are the three companies selected to design hypersonic missile interceptors for MDA
48. Theresa Hitchens (12 Aug 2021) Next Budget Will Limit Glide Phase Interceptor Contractors: MDA Head 2028 target date is being accelerated. FY2022 decisions on GPI/Ground-Based Interceptor, GBI replacement (the Next generation interceptor NGI) will be made by Deputy Secretary Kathleen Hicks.
49. Theresa Hitchens (6 Jun 2024) First test of space-based hypersonic tracking sensors 'within a week', MDA director says

External links

• Official website