National Christian Forensics and Communications Association

Last updated
NCFCA Christian Speech & Debate League
Formation1995 [1]
Headquarters Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States [2]
Website ncfca.org

The Christian Speech & Debate League, also known as the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, is a speech and debate league for Christian students in the United States. The NCFCA was established in 2001 after outgrowing its parent organization, the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), which had been running the league since it was originally established in 1995. NCFCA is now organized under its own board of directors with regional and state leadership coordinating various tournaments throughout the season.

Contents

Since 2001, the NCFCA seeks to provide students with the opportunity to apply and communicate their worldview with skill and clarity through competitive debate. The mission of the organization is to "challenge and equip ambassadors for Christ to communicate truth with integrity and grace." As a Christian organization, NCFCA's statement of faith is the Nicene Creed. NCFCA claims that "...their training and competition will provide a supportive opportunity for them to apply a biblical worldview to real-life issues." [3]

Structure of the organization

The NCFCA is a volunteer-run, non-profit organization. Tournaments are run by volunteers, who are usually parents, club directors, and league officials in the area. The judging pool includes parents of competitors, NCFCA alumni, and members of the community. Coaches also serve as judges on a volunteer basis. The NCFCA is governed by a board and divided into eleven regions. Each region has a regional coordinator and each state has a representative.

National Opens

Additionally, a certain number of national invitational slots are awarded each year at competitions known as National Opens. Currently, each national open awards two nationals slots for every individual speech event and debate event and four slots for moot court. These are large tournaments held mostly at colleges or large convention centers and are open to the entire nation. [4] Qualifying at a National Open tends to be more difficult than a regional qualifying tournament because of their increased size.

National opens since 2005:

National Mixers

National Mixers debuted in the 2017–2018 season and have been recalled for the 2022–2023 season. Mixers are competitions, now mostly online, incorporating competitors from two or more regions. They were officially known as March Mixer, because they only occurred in the month of March. As national level tournaments, they hosted moot court, but they only gave out one national championship slot in each individual event and debate event and two slots in moot court. In the first year, there were eight March Mixers, all occurring in the first two weeks of March. There was a mixer in a city inside every region except 1 and 3 (which are much smaller than the other eight regions). Because of the large number of mixers and their close proximity in time, most competitors went to only the mixer closest to their home in the first year even though they could technically attend any mixer in the country.

As of the 2022–2023 NCFCA season, there were two online Moot Court national mixers and one online national mixer. Mixers between two or more individual regions happened throughout the season, from January into March.

Competition

During the 2022-2023 season, there were roughly 38,000 students participating, making the NCFCA the third largest national high school speech and debate league after the National Speech and Debate Association and the National Catholic Forensic League. [9]

Speech

The NCFCA offers ten individual events for speech from three categories: Platform (memorized, 10-minute speeches), Interpretation (short interpretations of written works), and Limited Preparation (impromptu or limited preparation speeches). [10] The rules for each of these events are published in the Speech Guide each season.

Competitors may only compete in five out of the ten events at a given tournament.

At qualifier tournaments, competitors compete in three rounds of speech and are judged by three judges. Afterwards, the top competitors enter into elimination rounds.

As of the 2023-2024 NCFCA season, these events are:

From 2002 to 2007 and 2013–2014, the NCFCA also provided a different Wildcard event each season:

Debate

The NCFCA offers three types of debate: Team Policy Debate, Lincoln-Douglas Value Debate, and Moot court. [12] The NCFCA discourages the use of overly complicated theory and extremely fast talking (also known as "spreading"), instead encouraging effective communication of complex topics to lay judges. [13]

At tournaments, competitors speak in six rounds and are judged by one judge in preliminary rounds. In elimination rounds, competitors are judged by three judges and are judged by five judges in the qualifier tournament final.


Debate resolutions

NCFCA resolutions are chosen annually by affiliate families through a voting process. The Debate Committee proposes three resolution options, and each family is allowed one vote per each style of debate.

Team Policy Resolutions

2023-2024: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should significantly reform its domestic transportation policy implemented by the Department of Transportation. [15]

2022-2023: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should significantly reform its import and/or export policies within the bounds of international trade. [16]

2021-2022: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should significantly reform its policies regarding convicted prisoners under federal jurisdiction. [17]

2020-2021: Resolved: The European Union should substantially reform its immigration policy. [18]

2019-2020: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially reform its energy policy. [19]

2018-2019: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially reform its foreign policy regarding international terrorism.

2017-2018: Resolved: The United States should significantly reform its policies regarding higher education. [20]

2016-2017: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should substantially reform its policies toward the People's Republic of China.

2015–2016: Resolved: That the United States Federal Court system should be significantly reformed. [21]

2014–2015: Resolved: The United States should significantly reform its policy toward one or more countries in the Middle East. [21]

2013–2014: Resolved: That federal election law should be significantly reformed in the United States. [21]

2012–2013: Resolved: The United Nations should be significantly reformed or abolished. [22]

2011–2012: Resolved: The United States Federal Government should significantly reform its criminal justice system. [22]

2010–2011: Resolved: That the United States Federal Government should significantly reform its policy toward Russia. [22]

2009–2010: Resolved: That the United States Federal Government should significantly reform its environmental policy. [22]

2008–2009: Resolved: That the United States Federal Government should significantly change its policy toward India. [22]

2007–2008: Resolved: That the United States Federal Government should substantially change its policy on illegal immigration. [22]

2006–2007: Resolved: That the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) should be significantly reformed or abolished. [22]

2005–2006: Resolved: That medical malpractice law should be significantly reformed in the United States. [22]

2004–2005: Resolved: That the United States should change its energy policy to substantially reduce its dependence on foreign oil. [22]

2003–2004: Resolved: That the United States federal government should significantly change its policy toward one or more of its protectorates. [22]

2002–2003: Resolved: That the United States should significantly change its trade policy within one or more of the following areas: The Middle East and Africa. [22]

2001–2002: Resolved: That the United States federal government should significantly change its agricultural policy. [22]

2000–2001: Resolved: That the United States should significantly change its immigration policy. [22]

1999–2000: Resolved: That the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution should be repealed and replaced with an alternate tax policy. [22]

1998–1999: Resolved: That the United States federal government should substantially change the rules governing federal campaign finances. [22]

1997–1998: Resolved: That Congress should enact laws which discourage the relocation of U.S. businesses to foreign countries. [22]

1997–1998: Resolved: That the United States should change its rules governing foreign military intervention. [22]

Lincoln Douglas Resolutions

2023-2024: Resolved: rationalism should be valued above empiricism. [23]

2022-2023: Resolved: The individual right to property ought to be valued above the economic interest of the community. [16]

2021-2022: Resolved: In the context of innovation, the proactionary principle ought to be valued above the precautionary principle. [17]

2020-2021: Resolved: In democratic elections, the public's right to know ought to be valued above a candidate's right to privacy. [18]

2019-2020: Resolved: Preventive war is ethical. [24]

2018-2019: Resolved: When in conflict, governments should value fair trade above free trade. [25]

2017–2018: Resolved: Nationalism ought to be valued above globalism. [20]

2016–2017: Resolved: Rehabilitation ought to be valued above retribution in criminal justice systems.

2015–2016: Resolved: When in conflict, the right to individual privacy is more important than national security. [21]

2014–2015: Resolved: In the realm of economics, freedom ought to be valued above equity. [21]

2013–2014: Resolved: National security ought to be valued above Freedom of the press. [21]

2012–2013: Resolved: That governments have a moral obligation to assist other nations in need. [22]

2011–2012: Resolved: In the pursuit of justice, due process ought to be valued above the discovery of fact. [22]

2010–2011: Resolved: A government's legitimacy is determined more by its respect for popular sovereignty than individual rights. [22]

2009–2010: Resolved: That competition is superior to cooperation as a means of achieving excellence. [22]

2008–2009: Resolved: When in conflict, idealism ought to be valued above pragmatism. [22]

2007–2008: Resolved: That the United States of America ought to more highly value isolationism. [22]

2006–2007: Resolved: Democracy is overvalued by the United States government. [22]

2005–2006: Resolved: That the media's right to protect confidential sources is more important than the public's right to know. [22]

2004–2005: Resolved: That the restriction of civil rights for the sake of national security is justified. [22]

2003–2004: Resolved: That when in conflict, cultural unity in the United States should be valued above cultural diversity. [22]

2002–2003: Resolved: That human rights should be valued above national sovereignty. [22]

2001–2002: Resolved: That the restriction of economic liberty for the sake of the general welfare is justified in the field of agriculture. [22]

National Championship locations

See also

Related Research Articles

The nullification crisis was a sectional political crisis in the United States in 1832 and 1833, during the presidency of Andrew Jackson, which involved a confrontation between the state of South Carolina and the federal government. It ensued after South Carolina declared the federal Tariffs of 1828 and 1832 unconstitutional and therefore null and void within the sovereign boundaries of the state. However, courts at the state and federal level, including the U.S. Supreme Court, repeatedly have rejected the theory of nullification by states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Origins of the American Civil War</span>

Historians who address the origins of the American Civil War agree that the preservation of the institution of slavery was the principal aim of the 11 Southern states that declared their secession from the United States and united to form the Confederate States of America. However, while historians in the 21st century agree on the centrality of the conflict over slavery—it was not just "a cause" of the war but "the cause" according to Civil War historian Chris Mackowski—they disagree sharply on which aspects of this conflict were most important, and on the North’s reasons for refusing to allow the Southern states to secede. Proponents of the pseudo-historical Lost Cause ideology have denied that slavery was the principal cause of the secession, a view that has been disproven by the overwhelming historical evidence against it, notably the seceding states' own secession documents.

Lincoln–Douglas debate is a type of one-on-one competitive debate practiced mainly in the United States at the high school level. It is sometimes also called values debate because the format traditionally places a heavy emphasis on logic, ethical values, and philosophy. The Lincoln–Douglas debate format is named for the 1858 Lincoln–Douglas debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, because their debates focused on slavery and the morals, values, and logic behind it. LD debates are used by the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) competitions, and also widely used in related debate leagues such as the National Christian Forensics and Communication Association, the National Catholic Forensic League, the National Educational Debate Association, the Texas University Interscholastic League, Texas Forensic Association, Stoa USA and their affiliated regional organizations.

Policy debate is an American form of debate competition in which teams of two usually advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech. Evidence presentation is a crucial part of policy debate. The main argument being debated during a round is to change or not change the status quo. When a team explains why their solvency is greater than the opposition's, they compare advantages. One team’s job is to argue that the resolution— the statement that we should make some specific change to a national or international problem —is a good idea. Affirmative teams generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution. On the other hand, the Negative teams present arguments against the implementation of the resolution. In a single round of debate competition, each person gives two speeches. The first speech each person gives is called a “constructive” speech, because it is the speech when the first person of the team speaks positively, presenting the team's main idea without rebuttals that have not occurred, presents the basic arguments they will make throughout the debate. The second speech is called a “rebuttal”, because this is the speech where each person tries to rebut the arguments made by the other team, while using their own arguments to try to persuade the judge to vote for their team. The Affirmative has to persuade the judge to vote for the resolution, while the Negative has to persuade the judge the Negative's position is a better idea.

The American Parliamentary Debate Association (APDA) is the oldest intercollegiate parliamentary debating association in the United States. APDA sponsors over 50 tournaments a year, all in a parliamentary format, as well as a national championship in late April. It also administers the North American Debating Championship with the Canadian University Society for Intercollegiate Debate (CUSID) every year in January. Although it is mainly funded by its member universities, APDA is an entirely student-run organization.

Individual events in speech include public speaking, limited preparation, acting and interpretation are a part of forensics competitions. These events do not include the several different forms of debate offered by many tournaments. These events are called individual events because they tend to be done by one person unlike debate which often includes teams. This distinction however is not entirely accurate any more given the addition of duo interpretation events and forms of single person debate. Competitive speech competitions and debates comprise the area of forensics. Forensics leagues have a number of speech events, generally determined by geographical region or league preference. While there are several key events that have been around a long time, there are several experimental events around the country every year that can be limited to individual tournaments. Forensics leagues in the United States includes the National Speech and Debate Association, the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, the American Forensics Association, the National Forensics Association, the Interstate Oratorical Association and Stoa USA. Organized competitions are held at the high-school and collegiate level. Outside of the rules for each event provided by the individual leagues, there are several cultural norms within each region that are not written into law but are almost always followed. Rules for time limits vary by event and by individual tournaments, but there are penalties in every event for exceeding the time limits though the severity of the penalty widely varies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Educational Debate Association</span>

The National Educational Debate Association (NEDA) is an American collegiate debate association emphasizing audience-centered debate. It was founded by debate educators who believe that the debate tournament is an extension of the communication classroom and that even competitive debates should provide students with skills of research, argument selection, and presentation style that will benefit them as public advocates. NEDA schedules eight invitational tournaments a year, primarily in the mid-west. The association debates two resolutions per year. The fall resolution is one of value, and the spring resolution is one of policy.

Humorous Interpretation is an event in competitive middle and high school forensics leagues such as the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association and the National Speech and Debate Association. It consists of a piece from any published work, edited to fit within a 10-minute span with a 30-second grace period. It is judged based upon how the person portrays his or her characters and whether the piece is humorous. Ideally proper portrayal of characters should achieve a comedic effect to the judge. Humorous Interpretation and Dramatic Interpretation pieces are often used for the National Catholic Forensic League category of Dramatic Performance, which has similar rules but allows for a wider variety of pieces.

Public forum debate is a form of competitive debate which centers on current events and relies on both logic and evidence to construct arguments. It is primarily competed by middle and high school students, but college teams exist as well. Invented in the US, Public Forum is one of the most prominent American debate events, alongside policy debate and Lincoln-Douglas debate; it is also practiced in China and India, and has been recently introduced to Romania. Individuals give short speeches that are interspersed with 3 minute "Crossfire" sections, questions and answers between opposed debaters. The winner is determined by a judge who also serves as a referee. The debate centers on advocating or rejecting a position, "resolve", or "resolution", which is usually a proposal of a potential solution to a current events issue. Public Forum is designed to be accessible to the average citizen.


Extemporaneous Speaking is a speech delivery style/speaking style, and a term that identifies a specific forensic competition. The competition is a speech event based on research and original analysis, done with a limited-preparation; in the United States those competitions are held for high school and college students. In a Extemporaneous Speech competition, enrolled participants prepare for thirty minutes on a question related to current events and then give a seven-minute speech responding to that question. The extemporaneous speaking delivery style, referred to as "off-the-cuff", is a type of delivery method for a public presentation, that was carefully prepared and practiced but not memorized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional Convention (United States)</span> 1787 meeting of U.S. state delegates

The Constitutional Convention took place in Philadelphia from May 25 to September 17, 1787. Although the convention was intended to revise the league of states and first system of government under the Articles of Confederation, the intention from the outset of many of its proponents, chief among them James Madison of Virginia and Alexander Hamilton of New York, was to create a new Frame of Government rather than fix the existing one. The delegates elected George Washington of Virginia, former commanding general of the Continental Army in the late American Revolutionary War (1775–1783) and proponent of a stronger national government, to become President of the convention. The result of the convention was the creation of the Constitution of the United States, placing the Convention among the most significant events in American history.

The National Forensic Association (NFA) is an American intercollegiate organization designed to promote excellence in individual events and debate. The NFA sponsors the NFA Nationals as well many other regional tournaments throughout the year. The 2023 NFA national tournament will be hosted by Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois. Founded in 1971, the NFA Nationals is the oldest national collegiate tournament dedicated to a full range of literature interpretation, public address, limited preparation, and debate events.

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test for when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute. The decision articulated a doctrine known as "Chevron deference". Chevron deference consists of a two-part test that is deferential to government agencies: first, whether Congress has spoken directly to the precise issue at question, and second, "whether the agency's answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute."

The Tournament of Champions (TOC) is a national high school speech and debate tournament held at the University of Kentucky every year in a weekend in April. Tournament of Champions is considered to be the national championship of the “National Circuit", and is one of the most prestigious and competitive American high school speech and debate tournaments. Tournament of Champions currently holds competition in Policy debate, Lincoln–Douglas debate, Public Forum debate, Congressional Debate, World Schools Debate, Extemporaneous Speaking, Original Oratory, Informative Speaking, Dramatic Interpretation, Duo Interpretation, Humorous Interpretation, Oral Interpretation, and Program Oral Interpretation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Bill of Rights</span> First ten amendments to the US Constitution

The United States Bill of Rights comprises the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. Proposed following the often bitter 1787–88 debate over the ratification of the Constitution and written to address the objections raised by Anti-Federalists, the Bill of Rights amendments add to the Constitution specific guarantees of personal freedoms and rights, clear limitations on the government's power in judicial and other proceedings, and explicit declarations that all powers not specifically granted to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved to the states or the people. The concepts codified in these amendments are built upon those in earlier documents, especially the Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776), as well as the Northwest Ordinance (1787), the English Bill of Rights (1689), and Magna Carta (1215).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">September 2009 Barack Obama speech to a joint session of Congress</span>

The President of the United States Barack Obama discussed his plan for health care reform in a speech delivered to a joint session of the 111th United States Congress on September 9, 2009 at 8:00 PM (EDT). The speech was delivered to Congress on the floor of the chamber of the United States House of Representatives in the United States Capitol. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi presided over the joint session and was accompanied by the President of the United States Senate, Joe Biden, the Vice President of the United States. Energy Secretary Steven Chu was chosen as the designated survivor and did not attend the speech.

Stoa USA, also referred to as Stoa, is a Christian homeschool forensics organization in the United States. It is one of the four major national high school forensics organizations: the others are the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA), National Catholic Forensic League (NCFL), and the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association (NCFCA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Forensic Association National Speech Tournament</span>

The American Forensic Association National Speech Tournament (AFA-NST) is an intercollegiate, individual events based forensics tournament held in conjunction with the first Saturday in April, beginning on the prior Friday and continuing through the subsequent Monday. In comparison to National Forensic Association Nationals, another prominent college-level individual events national tournament, the AFA-NST has significantly more stringent qualification procedures and a smaller, but more exclusive field of competition. The AFA-NST represents the culmination of the forensics season for many collegiate speech teams.

This is a glossary of policy debate terms.

The Augusta Declaration, or the Memorial of Augusta County Committee, May 10, 1776, was a statement presented to the Fifth Virginia Convention in Williamsburg, Virginia on May 10, 1776. The Declaration announced the necessity of the Thirteen Colonies to form a permanent and independent union of states and national government separate from Great Britain, with whom the Colonies were at war.

References

  1. "Global Debate Blog". Debate.uvm.edu. 2007-06-12. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
  2. Archived April 14, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  3. Rosa, Natalia (2020-09-09). "NCFCA Christian Speech & Debate League". ncfca.org. Retrieved 2021-07-26.
  4. "Rhetoric team to participate in Texas National Open Tournament". Huntsville Item. 2 March 2008.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Archived November 16, 2013, at the Wayback Machine
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "Past Seasons' Results". NCFCA. Archived from the original on 2016-06-08. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
  7. "National Christian Forensics and Communications Association - NCFCA N…". archive.ph. 2014-08-19. Archived from the original on 2014-08-19. Retrieved 2021-05-25.
  8. "Current Season's Results". NCFCA. Archived from the original on 2016-04-27. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
  9. "NCFCA | Christian Speech & Debate League". ncfca.org. Retrieved 2023-10-18.
  10. "Competition Results". Ncfca.org. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
  11. "Speech and Debate Competition". Ncfca.org. Archived from the original on 2014-07-29. Retrieved 2016-01-17.
  12. Ida Brown (9 January 2008). "Home schoolers from four states to debate at local church". Meridian Star.
  13. Archived April 14, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  14. 1 2 Office (2022-05-10). "2022-2023 Debate Resolutions Announced | NCFCA". ncfca.org. Retrieved 2023-03-18.
  15. Rosa, Natalia (2020-10-11). "Join The Christian Speech & Debate League". ncfca.org. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  16. 1 2 "Join The Christian Speech & Debate League". 2022-09-29. Archived from the original on 2022-09-29. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  17. 1 2 "Join The Christian Speech & Debate League". 2022-06-27. Archived from the original on 2022-06-27. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  18. 1 2 "Join The Christian Speech & Debate League". 2021-06-26. Archived from the original on 2021-06-26. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  19. "Team Policy - NCFCA". 2020-02-21. Archived from the original on 2020-02-21. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  20. 1 2 "NCFCA | Debate". 2018-02-24. Archived from the original on 2018-02-24. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "National Christian Forensics and Communications Association -". 2014-09-08. Archived from the original on 2014-09-08. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 "National Christian Forensics and Communications Association -". 2014-07-30. Archived from the original on 2014-07-30. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  23. Rosa, Natalia (2020-10-11). "Join The Christian Speech & Debate League". ncfca.org. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  24. "Lincoln-Douglas Value - NCFCA". 2020-02-21. Archived from the original on 2020-02-21. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  25. Durland, Harrison (2018-07-16). "Topic Analysis: NCFCA LD Resolution 2018-19 ("Free Trade" vs. "Fair Trade")". Ethos Debate, LLC. Retrieved 2023-12-27.
  26. "NCFCA Season Cancellation Notice". National Catholic Forensic League. March 21, 2020. Retrieved October 11, 2020.

http://iew.com/