Profession of Medicine

Last updated
Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied knowledge
Author Eliot Freidson
CountryUnited States of America
LanguageEnglish
GenreNonfiction
Published1970
PublisherNew York University

Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied knowledge is a book by medical sociologist Eliot Freidson published in 1970. It received the Sorokin Award from the American Sociological Association for most outstanding contribution to scholarship, and has been translated into four languages. [1]

Contents

Peter Conrad argues that the book was the first book to apply sociological analysis to the profession and institution of medicine itself. The book contains many concepts that have affected our understanding of medicine including professional dominance, functional autonomy, clinical mentality, self-regulation, the social construction of illness, the connection between illness and deviance, illness as a social state. [2] :144 Bosks draws comparison of with the ideas in the book to Max Weber's analysis on the role of technical rationality and profession expertise on decision-making in a democratic society. [3] :289 Michael Calnon argues that the books sociological perspective is similar to that of structural pluralism where the medical profession is seen as a mediator between the state and the public, with the benefit of increased trust and reduced governmental costs.

Synopsis

The book comprises four parts: the first explores the organization of the medical profession, the second explores the performance of day-to-day work, the third expores how the concept of illness functions socially, and the last explores what the role of technical expertise should be in a free society.

Freidson argues that the definition of profession is ill-defined and that people do not agree on which activities should be considered professions. He seeks to explore the sociological properties of the medical profession to understand what "profession" is. [4] :4

Part I: Formal Organization of Medicine

In this first section, Freidson explores the history of medicine from a sociology perspective contrasting modern medicine with that the Greeks, Renaissance Medicine, and witch doctors in Africa. He distinguishes professions that help people solve problems, including lawyers and doctors, from those that pursue, such as academic scholars. [4] :22

Freidson contrasts modern medicine to the Zande medicine of East Africa documented by E. E. Evans-Pritchard. [4] :6 In Zande medicine, the role of the doctor was to be a third party who established the causes of illness, as well as "leechcraft" that consisted of administering drugs, and the supposed removing "magical pellets" embedded in the body. The Zande people believed that witchcraft was an innate property of individuals passed hereditarily but potentially inactive. [4] :8 If an individual was found to be practicing witchcraft they could apologize, claim lack of intent and beg for their witchcraft to "cool". Zande witch-doctors were not very respected, Freidson hypothesizes this is because their divinations of the causes of ailments were not very effective. Freidson argues that in the past western medicine had a similar role to this witch doctoring. [4] :11

Freidson argues that the study of the history of medicine does not give an accurate portrayal of the profession, since the study tends to only identify times at which medicine discovered things that are now considered true, rather than considering the ineffective treatments that were considered best practice in the past. Historians also fail to distinguish between the history of medical discover, and medical practice, noting that scientific discoveries did not necessarily form part of medical practice. [4] :13 He argues that medical practice in the past consisted of a number of conflicting theories for the cause of disease, where untrue theories such as the humoral medicine would sit beside more scientific viewpoints. [4] :16

Freidson notes the 1860 discovery that anthrax was caused by a bacteria as a significant turning point in the practice of medicine, followed by a period where a theoretical model established a cause of a number of diseases. This allowed empirical treatments to be replaced by treatments based on the actual cause of the disease, or the prevention of the disease by the likes of Koch and Pasteur. [4] :16

Part II: The organization of professional performance

Freidson explores medical workplaces in this section. [4] :90

Part III: Social construction of disease

Freidson follows Luckmann and Berger's, The Social Construction of Reality, to consider how illness can function as a social rather than biological state. [4] :206 Illness is explored as a form of social deviance. [4] :205 Freidson looks at the construction of illness from a professional, lay, and societal perspective. [4] :205

Freidson notes that the role of medicine had increased in American society taking over roles that had previously been filled by religious concepts. [4] :248 Citing Thomas Szasz, e argues that defining problems as medical problems rather than moral one's risks removing individuals rights to judge moral matters oneself drawing comparison to the individuals right to interpret scripture for themselves. [4] :250

Part IV: Consulting Professions in a Free Society

Freidson argues that professions should have autonomy to make decisions that are technical, but they should not make decisions in areas where they do not have expertise, and that on moral or evaluative questions lay people should have as same involvement in decision making as experts. [4] :338

Freidson distinguishes between codified expert knowledge and theories, which is stored in textbooks and publication, and the practice being an expert. This distinction is termed research versus practice. [4] :339 Freidson argues that since the practice of expertise happens in a social environment, the practice of knowledge is a social and socially biased activity. [4] :339

Regarding the practice of knowledge, Freidson distinguishes four aspects of medicine: germ theory, the classification of disease, the analysis of prevention or reversing disease states, and the management of when the techniques of disease prevention are applied. [4] :340 Freidson notes that the use of medical technology, in the sense of diagnosis and treatment, has social meaning and so is a social activity.

Freidson thinks germ theory is an expert activity in which the layman is not involved. [4] :342 However, Freidson argues that the identification of disease is in part a moral activity. Drawing analogy to law, a doctor may be an expert in what is or is not a disease, but not whether the diagnosis and treatment is moral, since it is a moral question to decide whether a particular state is undesirable or not. [4] :343

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicine</span> Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of illness

Medicine is the science and practice of caring for a patient, managing the diagnosis, prognosis, prevention, treatment, palliation of their injury or disease, and promoting their health. Medicine encompasses a variety of health care practices evolved to maintain and restore health by the prevention and treatment of illness. Contemporary medicine applies biomedical sciences, biomedical research, genetics, and medical technology to diagnose, treat, and prevent injury and disease, typically through pharmaceuticals or surgery, but also through therapies as diverse as psychotherapy, external splints and traction, medical devices, biologics, and ionizing radiation, amongst others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Physician</span> Professional who practices medicine

A physician, medical practitioner, medical doctor, or simply doctor, is a health professional who practices medicine, which is concerned with promoting, maintaining or restoring health through the study, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of disease, injury, and other physical and mental impairments. Physicians may focus their practice on certain disease categories, types of patients, and methods of treatment—known as specialities—or they may assume responsibility for the provision of continuing and comprehensive medical care to individuals, families, and communities—known as general practice. Medical practice properly requires both a detailed knowledge of the academic disciplines, such as anatomy and physiology, underlying diseases and their treatment—the science of medicine—and also a decent competence in its applied practice—the art or craft of medicine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Profession</span> Vocation founded upon specialized educational training

A profession is a field of work that has been successfully professionalized. It can be defined as a disciplined group of individuals, professionals, who adhere to ethical standards and who hold themselves out as, and are accepted by the public as possessing special knowledge and skills in a widely recognised body of learning derived from research, education and training at a high level, and who are prepared to apply this knowledge and exercise these skills in the interest of others.

Psychosomatic medicine is an interdisciplinary medical field exploring the relationships among social, psychological, behavioral factors on bodily processes and quality of life in humans and animals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Szasz</span> Hungarian-American psychiatrist and activist (1920–2012)

Thomas Stephen Szasz was a Hungarian-American academic and psychiatrist. He served for most of his career as professor of psychiatry at the State University of New York Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, New York. A distinguished lifetime fellow of the American Psychiatric Association and a life member of the American Psychoanalytic Association, he was best known as a social critic of the moral and scientific foundations of psychiatry, as what he saw as the social control aims of medicine in modern society, as well as scientism.

Medical anthropology studies "human health and disease, health care systems, and biocultural adaptation". It views humans from multidimensional and ecological perspectives. It is one of the most highly developed areas of anthropology and applied anthropology, and is a subfield of social and cultural anthropology that examines the ways in which culture and society are organized around or influenced by issues of health, health care and related issues.

Historically, mental disorders have had three major explanations, namely, the supernatural, biological and psychological models. For much of recorded history, deviant behavior has been considered supernatural and a reflection of the battle between good and evil. When confronted with unexplainable, irrational behavior and by suffering and upheaval, people have perceived evil. In fact, in the Persian Empire from 550 to 330 B.C., all physical and mental disorders were considered the work of the devil. Physical causes of mental disorders have been sought in history. Hippocrates was important in this tradition as he identified syphilis as a disease and was, therefore, an early proponent of the idea that psychological disorders are biologically caused. This was a precursor to modern psycho-social treatment approaches to the causation of psychopathology, with the focus on psychological, social and cultural factors. Well known philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, etc., wrote about the importance of fantasies, dreams, and thus anticipated, to some extent, the fields of psychoanalytic thought and cognitive science that were later developed. They were also some of the first to advocate for humane and responsible care for individuals with psychological disturbances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medieval medicine of Western Europe</span> Aspect of history

Medieval medicine in Western Europe was composed of a mixture of pseudoscientific ideas from antiquity. In the Early Middle Ages, following the fall of the Western Roman Empire, standard medical knowledge was based chiefly upon surviving Greek and Roman texts, preserved in monasteries and elsewhere. Medieval medicine is widely misunderstood, thought of as a uniform attitude composed of placing hopes in the church and God to heal all sicknesses, while sickness itself exists as a product of destiny, sin, and astral influences as physical causes. On the other hand, medieval medicine, especially in the second half of the medieval period, became a formal body of theoretical knowledge and was institutionalized in the universities. Medieval medicine attributed illnesses, and disease, not to sinful behaviour, but to natural causes, and sin was connected to illness only in a more general sense of the view that disease manifested in humanity as a result of its fallen state from God. Medieval medicine also recognized that illnesses spread from person to person, that certain lifestyles may cause ill health, and some people have a greater predisposition towards bad health than others.

<i>On Ancient Medicine</i> Greek medical text, c. 450–400 B.C.

The treatise On Ancient Medicine is perhaps the most intriguing and compelling work of the Hippocratic Corpus. The Corpus itself is a collection of about sixty writings covering all areas of medical thought and practice. Traditionally associated with Hippocrates, the father of Western medicine, philological evidence now suggests that it was written over a period of several centuries and stylistically seems to indicate that it was the product of many authors dating from about 450–400 B.C.

The medical model of disability, or medical model, is based in a biomedical perception of disability. This model links a disability diagnosis to an individual's physical body. The model supposes that this disability may reduce the individual's quality of life and aims to diminish or correct this disability with medical intervention. It is often contrasted with the social model of disability.

Medicalization is the process by which human conditions and problems come to be defined and treated as medical conditions, and thus become the subject of medical study, diagnosis, prevention, or treatment. Medicalization can be driven by new evidence or hypotheses about conditions; by changing social attitudes or economic considerations; or by the development of new medications or treatments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of health and illness</span> Branch of sociology

The sociology of health and illness, sociology of health and wellness, or health sociology examines the interaction between society and health. As a field of study it is interested in all aspects of life, including contemporary as well as historical influences, that impact and alter our health and wellbeing.

Behavioral medicine is concerned with the integration of knowledge in the biological, behavioral, psychological, and social sciences relevant to health and illness. These sciences include epidemiology, anthropology, sociology, psychology, physiology, pharmacology, nutrition, neuroanatomy, endocrinology, and immunology. The term is often used interchangeably, but incorrectly, with health psychology. The practice of behavioral medicine encompasses health psychology, but also includes applied psychophysiological therapies such as biofeedback, hypnosis, and bio-behavioral therapy of physical disorders, aspects of occupational therapy, rehabilitation medicine, and physiatry, as well as preventive medicine. In contrast, health psychology represents a stronger emphasis specifically on psychology's role in both behavioral medicine and behavioral health.

In medical anthropology, naturalistic disease theories are those theories, present within a culture, which explain diseases and illnesses in impersonal terms. George Foster explains naturalistic disease theory as following an "equilibrium model" in which health results from ideal balances of well being appropriate to one's age, condition, and environment. Imbalances in these systems result in illness through impersonal and systematic mechanisms. One example of a naturalistic disease theory is the theory expressed in western medicine or biomedicine, which links disease and illness to scientific causes. This leaves any personal liability for the disease out of the equation, and the diseases are attributed to organisms such as bacteria or viruses, accidents, or toxic substances.

Medical model is the term coined by psychiatrist R. D. Laing in his The Politics of the Family and Other Essays (1971), for the "set of procedures in which all doctors are trained". It includes complaint, history, physical examination, ancillary tests if needed, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis with and without treatment.

Professionalization is a social process by which any trade or occupation transforms itself into a true "profession of the highest integrity and competence." The definition of what constitutes a profession is often contested. Professionalization tends to result in establishing acceptable qualifications, one or more professional associations to recommend best practice and to oversee the conduct of members of the profession, and some degree of demarcation of the qualified from unqualified amateurs. It is also likely to create "occupational closure", closing the profession to entry from outsiders, amateurs and the unqualified.

<i>How Doctors Think</i>

How Doctors Think is a book released in March 2007 by Jerome Groopman, the Dina and Raphael Recanati Chair of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, chief of experimental medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, and staff writer for The New Yorker magazine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Traditional African medicine</span> Traditional medical practices in Africa

Traditional African medicine is a range of traditional medicine disciplines involving indigenous herbalism and African spirituality, typically including diviners, midwives, and herbalists. Practitioners of traditional African medicine claim, largely without evidence, to be able to cure a variety of diverse conditions including cancer, psychiatric disorders, high blood pressure, cholera, most venereal diseases, epilepsy, asthma, eczema, fever, anxiety, depression, benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary tract infections, gout, and healing of wounds and burns and even Ebola.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical sociology</span> Branch of sociology

Medical sociology is the sociological analysis of medical organizations and institutions; the production of knowledge and selection of methods, the actions and interactions of healthcare professionals, and the social or cultural effects of medical practice. The field commonly interacts with the sociology of knowledge, science and technology studies, and social epistemology. Medical sociologists are also interested in the qualitative experiences of patients, often working at the boundaries of public health, social work, demography and gerontology to explore phenomena at the intersection of the social and clinical sciences. Health disparities commonly relate to typical categories such as class and race. Objective sociological research findings quickly become a normative and political issue.

Eliot Freidson was a sociologist and medical sociologist who worked on the theory of professions. Charles Bosk says that Freidson was a founding figure in medical sociology who played a major role in the growth and legitimization of the subject. The American Sociological Society awards the Eliot Freidson Outstanding Publication Award for medical sociology every two years.

References

  1. "NYU's Freidson, Pioneer in Concept of Sociology in the Professions, 82". New York University .
  2. Conrad, Peter (2007-04-01). "Eliot Freidson's revolution in medical sociology". Health. 11 (2): 141–144. doi:10.1177/1363459307074688. ISSN   1363-4593. PMID   17344268. S2CID   5188956.
  3. Calnan, Michael (2015), Collyer, Fran (ed.), "Eliot Freidson: Sociological Narratives of Professionalism and Modern Medicine", The Palgrave Handbook of Social Theory in Health, Illness and Medicine, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 287–305, doi:10.1057/9781137355621_19, ISBN   978-1-137-35562-1 , retrieved 2021-11-01
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Freidson, Eliot (1988-05-15). Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. University of Chicago Press. ISBN   978-0-226-26228-4.