RateMyProfessors.com

Last updated

RateMyProfessors.com
RateMyProfessors logo (2021).svg
Type of site
 Review site
Available in English
Owner Cheddar
URL www.ratemyprofessors.com
LaunchedMay 1999;25 years ago (1999-05)

RateMyProfessors.com (RMP) is a review site founded in May 1999 by John Swapceinski, a software engineer from Menlo Park, California, which allows anyone to assign ratings to professors and campuses of American, Canadian, and United Kingdom institutions. [1] The site was originally launched as TeacherRatings.com and converted to RateMyProfessors in 2001. RMP was acquired in 2005 by Patrick Nagle and William DeSantis. [2] Nagle and DeSantis later resold RMP in 2007 to Viacom's MTVU, MTV's College channel. [3] Viacom owned and operated RateMyProfessors.com for a decade. Cheddar announced its acquisition of RMP from Viacom in 2018. [4] RMP is the largest online destination for professor ratings. The site includes 8,000+ schools, 1.7 million professors, and over 19 million ratings. [1]

Contents

Ratings and reviews

On RMP, users may post a rating and review of any professor that is already listed on the site. Furthermore, users may create a listing for any individual not already listed. To be posted, a rater must rate the course and/or professor on a 1-5 scale in the following categories: "overall quality" and "level of difficulty". The rater may also share if he or she would take the professor again, if the class was taken for credit, if attendance was mandatory, if the textbook was used, and what grade he or she received in the course; additionally, the rater may include comments of up to 350 characters in length. Since the website does not require users to create an account, non-students or even professors themselves can post ratings. Raters may also select up to 3 tags (from a list of 20) that describe the professor. [5] [6]

According to the website's help page, "a professor’s Overall Quality rating should reflect how well a professor teaches the course material, and how helpful he/she is both inside and outside of the classroom". [7] The professor's Overall Quality rating determines whether his/her name is accompanied by a smiley face (meaning "Good Quality"), a frowny face ("Poor Quality"), or an in-between, expressionless face ("Average Quality"). [5]

Correlation with in-class student evaluations

Using data for 426 instructors at the University of Maine, [researchers] examined the relationship between RMP indices and formal in-class student evaluations of teaching (SET). This study found that the two primary RMP indices correlated weakly with their respective SET items. First, RMP "overall quality" showed a correlation of only r = .68 with SET item "Overall, how would you rate the instructor?" Second, RMP "ease" showed a correlation of r = .44 with SET item "How did the work load for this course compare to that of others of equal credit?" Further, RMP "overall quality" (r = .57) and RMP "ease" (r = .51) were each correlated with its corresponding SET factor derived from a principal components analysis of all 29 SET items. The researchers concluded "While these RMP/SET correlations should give pause to those who are inclined to dismiss RMP indices as meaningless, the amount of variance left unexplained in SET criteria limits the utility of RMP." [8] Formal in-class evaluations can only be completed by students who are registered in the course, whereas on RMP, anyone can post ratings, whether or not they have taken the course.

Criticism

Stanford Law School and Reputation Protection

Two Stanford law professors argue that a legal framework for protecting online platform reputation should be responsive to the changing set of practices ushered in by the Internet and capable of resolving conflicts in a fair and satisfactory way. In light of recent failed lawsuits against online content providers, the professors advocate for "a new regime requiring such platforms to formulate an appropriate information policy providing transparency rules, including disclosing how aggregate evaluations are made and providing for a right to respond, to achieve a new body of communication “netiquette” for social evaluation in the online era." [9]

No guarantee of authenticity of users' student-status

As RMP does not require users to create accounts or log in before posting, there is no guarantee that the reviews are actually posted by students who have taken the course. [10] Professors who research controversial political subjects, particularly female professors and professors of color, often face harassment on RMP, when people who dislike their political opinions or scholarship can post abusive reviews by pretending to be students. For example, the RMP page of Rutgers University professor Audrey Truschke, a historian of Islamic India, is routinely used by Hindu supremacists to post demeaning and degrading reviews calling for her dismissal by Rutgers. [11]

Positive correlation between ease of class and rating of professor

Research on in-class evaluations shows that professor ratings increase when students rate the course as easy. [12] The same relationship has been shown for RMP. In an article in the journal Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Clayson investigated what RMP actually rates and concluded that "students will give higher evaluations to instructors they judge as being easy. There is also a suggestion in these findings that, if students like an instructor (for whatever reason), then the easiness of the class becomes relatively irrelevant.". [13] Clayson concluded that "the majority of the evidence indicates that [ratemyprofessors.com] is biassed by a halo effect, and creates what most accurately could be called a 'likeability' scale." Other analyses of RMP class ratings have come to similar conclusions, [14] [15] [16] and some have concluded that professor attractiveness is also positively correlated with evaluation scores on RMP. [17] Felton et al. evaluated RMP ratings and found that "the hotter and easier professors are, the more likely they’ll get rated as a good teacher." [18]

Evaluation bias issues

A frequent criticism of RMP is that there is little reason to think that the ratings accurately reflect the quality of the professors rated. [19] [20] Another criticism is that ratings have been shown to reflect gender bias toward the professors evaluated. [21] Furthermore, at RMP, "easiness", "clarity", and "helpfulness" are the only components taken into consideration and are not considered well-designed evaluations. [22] [23] Edward Nuhfer argues that both Pickaprof.com and RMP "are transparently obvious in their advocacy that describes a 'good teacher' as an easy grader. Additionally, presenter Phil Abrami ... rated RMP as 'The worst evaluation I've seen' during a panel discussion on student evaluations at the 2005 annual AERA meeting." [24]

Multiple ratings per person

Single individuals are able to make multiple separate ratings of a single professor on RMP. [25] RMP admits [26] that while it does not allow such multiple ratings from any one IP address, it has no control over raters who use several different computers, or those that "spoof" IP addresses. Also, there is no way of knowing that those who rate a professor's course have actually taken the course in question, making it possible for professors to rate themselves and each other. [27]

Rating relevancy

Critics stated that a number of the ratings focus on qualities they see as irrelevant to teaching, such as physical appearance. [28] In late June 2018, several academics criticized the website's "hotness" score for contributing to sexism in academia. [29] On 28 June, RateMyProfessors responded that while the feature was intended to "reflect a dynamic/exciting teaching style," it was often misused; the hotness rating was removed immediately. [29] [30]

RateMyProfessors lets the student identify the course that they took with the professor and combines the ratings for all courses taught by the professor instead of providing separate ratings averages for each course taught.

Permanent vs adjunct faculty

Adjunct faculty are not always readily identifiable or verifiable, as such professors may work at multiple universities, change universities frequently, or maintain employment outside an academic setting. [31] [32]

Data breach

On January 11, 2016, RMP notified its users via email (and with a small notification link on its website) that a decommissioned version of RMP's website suffered a data breach affecting email addresses, passwords, and registration dates. [33] According to the California Department of Justice website, the security breach occurred six weeks earlier on or about November 26, 2015. [34]

Website features

Professor Notes

After mtvU took over the website, a notes feature was added that allows professors to register with the website (using a ".edu" e-mail address) in order to reply to students' comments. Another option, called "Professors Strike Back", featured videos of professors responding to their ratings on RMP. [35] Additionally, in 2015, the site debuted a new series "Professors Read Their Ratings" [36] in which professors read and react to their RMP ratings. Students may also submit videos to RMP. [37]

Recognition

In 2008 RMP was recognized by Time Magazine as one of the 50 best websites of 2008.

In 2008, student evaluations of Professors from RMP accounted for 25% of a school's rating in Forbes annual "America's Best Colleges" listing. However, this is no longer true. [38]

In 2015, the site won two People's Choice Webby Awards after an extensive site overhaul. [39]

Competitors

The rating company has a variety of competitors. RateMyTeachers, a similar teacher rating forum was launched by Patrick Nagle in 2001. [40]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Textbook</span> Type of academic study book

A textbook is a book containing a comprehensive compilation of content in a branch of study with the intention of explaining it. Textbooks are produced to meet the needs of educators, usually at educational institutions. Schoolbooks are textbooks and other books used in schools. Today, many textbooks are published in both print and digital formats.

Blended learning or hybrid learning, also known as technology-mediated instruction, web-enhanced instruction, or mixed-mode instruction, is an approach to education that combines online educational materials and opportunities for interaction online with physical place-based classroom methods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open educational resources</span> Open learning resource

Open educational resources (OER) are teaching, learning, and research materials intentionally created and licensed to be free for the end user to own, share, and in most cases, modify. The term "OER" describes publicly accessible materials and resources for any user to use, re-mix, improve, and redistribute under some licenses. These are designed to reduce accessibility barriers by implementing best practices in teaching and to be adapted for local unique contexts.

A learning management system (LMS) or virtual learning environment (VLE) is a software application for the administration, documentation, tracking, reporting, automation, and delivery of educational courses, training programs, materials or learning and development programs. The learning management system concept emerged directly from e-Learning. Learning management systems make up the largest segment of the learning system market. The first introduction of the LMS was in the late 1990s. LMSs have been adopted by almost all higher education institutions in the English-speaking world. Learning management systems have faced a massive growth in usage due to the emphasis on remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RateMyTeachers.com (RMT) is a review site for rating K-12 and college teachers and courses. According to its website, its purpose is to help answer a single question: "what do I as a student need to know to maximize my chance of success in a given class?" As of April 2010, over eleven million teachers have been rated on the website.

A virtual university provides higher education programs through electronic media, typically the Internet. Some are bricks-and-mortar institutions that provide online learning as part of their extended university courses while others solely offer online courses. They are regarded as a form of distance education. The goal of virtual universities is to provide access to the part of the population who would not be able to attend a physical campus, for reasons such as distance—in which students live too far from a physical campus to attend regular classes; and the need for flexibility—some students need the flexibility to study at home whenever it is convenient for them to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Western Governors University</span> Online university

Western Governors University (WGU) is a private, non-profit online university based in Millcreek, Utah, United States. The university uses an online competency-based learning model, providing advanced education for working professionals. Degrees awarded by WGU are accredited by the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU). The university was founded by 19 U.S. governors in 1997 after the idea was formulated at a 1995 meeting of the Western Governors Association to expand education offerings to the internet.

A course evaluation is a paper or electronic questionnaire, which requires a written or selected response answer to a series of questions in order to evaluate the instruction of a given course. The term may also refer to the completed survey form or a summary of responses to questionnaires.

Formative assessment, formative evaluation, formative feedback, or assessment for learning, including diagnostic testing, is a range of formal and informal assessment procedures conducted by teachers during the learning process in order to modify teaching and learning activities to improve student attainment. The goal of a formative assessment is to monitor student learning to provide ongoing feedback that can help students identify their strengths and weaknesses and target areas that need work. It also helps faculty recognize where students are struggling and address problems immediately. It typically involves qualitative feedback for both student and teacher that focuses on the details of content and performance. It is commonly contrasted with summative assessment, which seeks to monitor educational outcomes, often for purposes of external accountability.

A review site is a website on which reviews can be posted about people, businesses, products, or services. These sites may use Web 2.0 techniques to gather reviews from site users or may employ professional writers to author reviews on the topic of concern for the site.

The system of education in Iceland is divided in four levels: playschool, compulsory, upper secondary and higher, and is similar to that of other Nordic countries. Education is mandatory for children aged 6–16. Most institutions are funded by the state; there are very few private schools in the country. Iceland is a country with gymnasia.

Assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments is a subject of interest to educators and researchers. The assessment tools utilized in computer-supported collaborative learning settings are used to measure groups' knowledge learning processes, the quality of groups' products and individuals' collaborative learning skills.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">São Paulo State Technological Colleges</span>

The São Paulo State Technological Colleges are public institutions of higher education maintained by the State Center of Technological Education (CEETEPS). FATECs are important Brazilian institutions of higher education, being pioneers in the graduation of technologists. They are located in several cities of the São Paulo state, with four campuses in the capital, and several other units in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, countryside and seashore.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of virtual learning environments</span> Home

A Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) is a system specifically designed to facilitate the management of educational courses by teachers for their students. It predominantly relies on computer hardware and software, enabling distance learning. In North America, this concept is commonly denoted as a "Learning Management System" (LMS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Academic standards</span> Benchmarks of education

Academic standards are the benchmarks of quality and excellence in education such as the rigour of curricula and the difficulty of examinations. The creation of universal academic standards requires agreement on rubrics, criteria or other systems of coding academic achievement. At colleges and universities, faculty are under increasing pressure from administrators to award students good marks and grades without regard for those students' actual abilities, both to keep those students in school paying tuition and to boost the schools' graduation rates. Students often use course evaluations to criticize any instructor who they feel has been making the course too difficult, even if an objective evaluation would show that the course has been too easy. It is very difficult to find a direct correlation between the quality of the course and the outcome of the course evaluations.

Online communication between home and school is the use of digital telecommunication to convey information and ideas between teachers, students, parents, and school administrators. As the use of e-mail and the internet becomes even more widespread, these tools become more valuable and useful in education for the purposes of increasing learning for students, and facilitating conversations between students, parents, and schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Massive open online course</span> Education service on the web

A massive open online course or an open online course is an online course aimed at unlimited participation and open access via the Web. In addition to traditional course materials, such as filmed lectures, readings, and problem sets, many MOOCs provide interactive courses with user forums or social media discussions to support community interactions among students, professors, and teaching assistants (TAs), as well as immediate feedback to quick quizzes and assignments. MOOCs are a widely researched development in distance education, first introduced in 2008, that emerged as a popular mode of learning in 2012, a year called the "Year of the MOOC".

StraighterLine is a U.S. educational company that offers low-price, online higher education courses that are equivalent to general courses required for a bachelor's degree. The American Council On Education’s College Credit Recommendation Service has evaluated and recommended college credit for StraighterLine courses. The company is itself unaccredited, but has over 150 partnerships with accredited colleges and universities that accept its courses for credit.

A student bill of rights is a document that outlines beliefs or regulations regarding student rights, typically adopted by a student group, school, or government. These documents can be policies, laws, or statements of belief.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kahoot!</span> Norwegian online educational quiz game

Kahoot! is a Norwegian online game-based learning platform. It has learning games, also known as "kahoots", which are user-generated multiple-choice quizzes that can be accessed via a web browser or the Kahoot! app.

References

  1. 1 2 "About RateMyProfessors.com" . Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  2. ↑ Glasner, Joanna. "Prof-Ratings Site Irks Academics". Wired. Retrieved April 28, 2023– via www.wired.com.
  3. ↑ "MTV Networks' mtvU Agrees to Acquire RateMyProfessors.com" . Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  4. ↑ "Cheddar buys a user-generated content biz, Rate My Professors, from Viacom". October 25, 2018.
  5. 1 2 Rate My Professors
  6. ↑ "Rate My Professors Help Center".
  7. ↑ "Rate My Professors Help Center".
  8. ↑ "RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching".
  9. ↑ Anne SY Cheung and Wolfgang Schulz, "Reputation Protection on Online Rating Sites," 21 STAN. TECH. L. REV. 310 (2018)
  10. ↑ "RateMyProfessors.com LLC | Complaints | Better Business Bureau® Profile". www.bbb.org. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  11. ↑ "Audrey Truschke at Rutgers - State University of New Jersey | Rate My Professors". www.ratemyprofessors.com. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  12. ↑ Mau, Ronald R., & Opengart, Rose A. (2012). Comparing Ratings: In-Class (Paper) vs. out of Class (Online) Student Evaluations. Higher Education Studies, 2(3), 55-68.
  13. ↑ Dennis E. Clayson (2013) What does ratemyprofessors.com actually rate?, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39:6, 678-698, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2013.861384
  14. ↑ Legg, Angela & H. Wilson, Janie. (2012). RateMyProfessors.com offers biased evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 37. 89-97. 10.1080/02602938.2010.507299.
  15. ↑ "Ratings". APA. 2007. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  16. ↑ Castro, Daniel, and Robert Atkinson. “Why it’s time to disrupt higher education by separating learning from credentialing”. Washington: Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, 2016. Online. Internet. 16 Apr 2018. Available: http://www2.itif.org/2016-disrupting-higher-education.pdf
  17. ↑ James Felton, Peter T. Koper, John Mitchell, and Michael Stinson. Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: student evaluations of professors on ratemyprofessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1):45–61, 2008
  18. ↑ David Epstein, "‘Hotness’ and Quality", Inside Higher Ed, 8 May 2006, accessed 10 May 2008.
  19. ↑ Pfeiffer, Sacha (September 20, 2006). "Ratings sites flourish behind a veil of anonymity". Boston Globe Online.
  20. ↑ Westhues, Kenneth (December 2006). "Stephen Berman: Scapegoat". UWaterloo.ca.
  21. ↑ Huntsberry, William (February 23, 2015). "How We Talk About Our Teachers". WNYC Morning Edition.
  22. ↑ Lang, James M. (December 1, 2003). "RateMyBuns.com". Chronicle of Higher Education.
  23. ↑ See Fritz Machlup and T. Wilson, cited in Paul Trout, "Deconstructing an Evaluation Form", The Montana Professor, Vol. 8 No. 3, Fall 1998, accessed 7 May 2008.
  24. ↑ Edward B. Nuhfer, 2005, "A Fractal Thinker Looks at Student Evaluations", accessed 10 May 2008.
  25. ↑ Gabriela Montell, "The Art of the Bogus Rating", Chronicle of Higher Education, September 27, 2006
  26. ↑ Pfeiffer, "Ratings sites flourish behind a veil of anonymity".[ better source needed ]
  27. ↑ Montell, "The Art of the Bogus Rating", Chronicle of Higher Education.
  28. ↑ Bates, Laura (February 13, 2015). "Female academics face huge sexist bias – no wonder there are so few of them". The Guardian. Retrieved June 30, 2018.
  29. 1 2 Flaherty, Colleen. "Bye, Bye, Chili Pepper". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  30. ↑ Dalbey, Alex (June 29, 2018). "Ratemyprofessors.com Ends Hotness Rating". The Daily Dot. Retrieved June 30, 2018.
  31. ↑ Lumpkin, Lauren (April 28, 2022). "In a city full of adjunct faculty members, many struggle to get by". Washington Post. ISSN   0190-8286 . Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  32. ↑ "Data Snapshot: Tenure and Contingency in US Higher Education". AAUP. March 16, 2023. Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  33. ↑ "RateMyProfessors.com – Find and rate your professor or campus". www.ratemyprofessors.com. Retrieved January 12, 2016.
  34. ↑ "Submitted Breach Notification Sample". January 12, 2016.
  35. ↑ "Reality TV Shows, Celebrity News, Pop Culture & Music Videos". MTV. Retrieved April 28, 2023.
  36. ↑ "Albion College Professors Read Their Ratings – Part 2".
  37. ↑ submit videos to RMP RMP
  38. ↑ "Top Colleges 2017: The Methodology". Forbes .
  39. ↑ "We've Won Two People's Voice Webby Awards!".
  40. ↑ "Rate My Professor aids in student choices".
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.