Relief of the Poor Act 1696

Poor Act 1697
Act of Parliament
	Parliament of England
Long title	An Act for explaining an Act made the last Session of Parliament, entituled, "An Act for supplying some Defects in the Laws for the Relief of the Poor of this Kingdome."
Citation	9 Will. 3. c. 11; (Ruffhead: 9 & 10 Will. 3. c. 11)
Dates
Royal assent	2 April 1698
Repealed	15 July 1867
Other legislation
Amends	Relief of the Poor Act 1696
Repealed by	Statute Law Revision Act 1867
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

Relief of the Poor Act 1696
Act of Parliament
	Parliament of England
Long title	An Act for supplying some Defects in the Laws for the Relief of the Poor of this Kingdom.
Citation	8 & 9 Will. 3. c. 30
Dates
Royal assent	16 April 1697
Other legislation
Amended by	Poor Act 1697
Repealed by	Poor Law Act 1927
Status: Repealed
Text of statute as originally enacted

Last updated November 17, 2023

The Relief of the Poor Act 1696 (8 & 9 Will. 3. c. 30), formally titled An Act for supplying some Defects in the Laws for the Relief of the Poor of this Kingdom, was a 1697 welfare statute, operating within the framework of the Poor Relief Act 1601. This act is perhaps best remembered for its expansion of the requirement that welfare recipients be marked to indicate their status, in this case by wearing a prominent badge.

Badging the poor

This Act required that all welfare recipients, including the wife and children of the head of a household receiving welfare, wear badges prominently on their right shoulders. These badges would contain the first letter of their parish name, followed by the letter "P".^[1] Thus, a recipient from Ampthill parish would wear a badge reading "AP".^[2] In her Curious Punishments of Bygone Days , Alice Morse Earle noted that this practice was also seen in Colonial America, though the badge format might be different. For instance, a badge for a New York pauper would read "N.Y.", while in Virginia, the badge might contain the parish name rather than an abbreviation,^[3] and in other cases might simply read "P.P." for "public pauper".^[4] A similar law also existed in Pennsylvania.^[5]

This badging practice was distinct from the earlier practice of issuing beggars' badges, which predated the Elizabethan Poor Act. One Act which authorized this was the Poor Act 1555 (2 & 3 Ph. & M. c. 5).^[6]

An earlier statute, the Poor Relief Act 1691 (3 Will. & Mar. c. 11), required the overseers of the poor to record the names of all those receiving welfare in their parishes. This statute was intended to limit abuse of funds by overseers.^[7] The 1697 Act added the badging requirement for the same reason.^[8] The penalty to paupers who did not wear badges was whipping and imprisonment, and overseers providing relief to such paupers were to be fined 20 shillings.^[7] One change to the badge requirement came with the Relief of the Poor Act 1782, which allowed "paupers of good character" to leave off the badge.^[9] Badging continued to be practiced until 1810, when it was repealed by Poor Act 1810 (50 Geo. 3. c. 52),^[7] though by the end of the 18th century it was noted as "almost universally neglected".^[10]

The badge continued to be thought of as a means of checking what is now called a welfare trap or poverty trap, wherein people prefer receiving benefits than working. One report ordered by the House of Commons of England suggested that temporarily restoring the badge would serve to dissuade such individuals from seeking out relief. The report further argued that "the Poor ought to know and feel that the eye of the public is upon them ready to check fraud and restrain importunity", and that the badge was one such means.^[11] Charles Jerram, an evangelical priest of the Church of England, did not go so far as to call for the revival of the badge, but did call for some means by which to distinguish "the profligate pauper from the unfortunate and virtuous sufferer".^[12]

Joseph Townsend, on the other hand, harshly criticized the badging practice as applying a badge of shame on the poor in exchange for relief. He further noted that many overseers disregarded the badge requirement, risking the fine. Townsend also argued that the badge had no real effect on those who it was truly seeking to dissuade from seeking out relief, for they would have no qualms about wearing the badge, while the more modest poor "would sooner die than wear it".^[13]

Year's service rule

Part of the system involved the determination of what parish to which a recipient belonged, and was thereby responsible to provide relief to that recipient. Under the earlier Poor Relief Act 1662 a parish could banish those poor unable to rent lodgings of at least £10 per year within forty days of their arrival in the parish. Those banished this way would be sent back to their parish of birth, or where they had resided in the prior three years.^[14]

The Relief of the Poor Act 1696 provided that a worker remaining "in the same service" for one year was given the right to settle in the parish, and thereafter would not be subject to expulsion when beginning to draw relief.^[15] The specifics required to gain settlement under this provision were explored in a number of cases. For instance, in R v Ulverstone, a woman servant was discharged from her contract to serve from Whitsuntide one year until the next year—a period of greater than 365 days that year—before its end, but after 365 days had elapsed. The Court held that despite being discharged before the end of the contract, she had served for one full year and was entitled to settle in the parish.^[16]

Another aspect of this rule is how "same service" is determined. It was possible for the circumstances, such as the contract of hiring, the master, or even the location to change to some degree without resetting the one year requirement. For example, in R v Overton, a servant was engaged from March until Michaelmas, and then hired for a full year. Said servant left in April—less than one year into the contract, but more than one year since he was first engaged. The court held that the two periods of service could be connected, and the servant was entitled settlement rights under the Poor Law.^[17]

Notes

Related Research Articles

The English Poor Laws were a system of poor relief in England and Wales that developed out of the codification of late-medieval and Tudor-era laws in 1587–1598. The system continued until the modern welfare state emerged after the Second World War.

In Britain and Ireland, a workhouse was an institution where those unable to support themselves financially were offered accommodation and employment. The earliest known use of the term workhouse is from 1631, in an account by the mayor of Abingdon reporting that "we have erected wthn [sic] our borough a workhouse to set poorer people to work".

Prince of Wales was a transport ship in the First Fleet, assigned to transport convicts for the European colonisation of Australia. Accounts differ regarding her origins; she may have been built and launched in 1779 at Sidmouth, or in 1786 on the River Thames. Her First Fleet voyage commenced in 1787, with 47 female convicts aboard, and she arrived at Botany Bay in January 1788. On a difficult return voyage in 1788–1789 she became separated from her convoy and was found drifting helplessly off Rio de Janeiro with her crew incapacitated by scurvy.

The Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 (PLAA) known widely as the New Poor Law, was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed by the Whig government of Earl Grey. It completely replaced earlier legislation based on the Poor Relief Act 1601 and attempted to fundamentally change the poverty relief system in England and Wales. It resulted from the 1832 Royal Commission into the Operation of the Poor Laws, which included Edwin Chadwick, John Bird Sumner and Nassau William Senior. Chadwick was dissatisfied with the law that resulted from his report. The Act was passed two years after the Representation of the People Act 1832 which extended the franchise to middle-class men. Some historians have argued that this was a major factor in the PLAA being passed.

A poor law union was a geographical territory, and early local government unit, in Great Britain and Ireland.

In England and Wales, an extra-parochial area, extra-parochial place or extra-parochial district was a geographically defined area considered to be outside any ecclesiastical or civil parish. Anomalies in the parochial system meant they had no church or clergymen and were therefore exempt from payment of poor or church rates and usually tithes. They were formed for a variety of reasons, often because an area was unpopulated or unsuitable for agriculture, but also around institutions and buildings or natural resources. Extra-parochial areas caused considerable problems when they became inhabited as they did not provide religious facilities, local governance or provide for the relief of the poor. Their status was often ambiguous and there was demand for extra-parochial areas to operate more like parishes. Following the introduction of the New Poor Law, extra-parochial areas were effectively made civil parishes by the Extra-Parochial Places Act 1857 and were eliminated by the Poor Law Amendment Act 1868. This was achieved either by being integrated with a neighbouring or surrounding parish, or by becoming a separate civil parish if the population was high enough.

The Roundsman System, in the Poor Relief Act 1601, was a form of organised labour exchange for the poorest labourers by which a parish vestry helped to pay local farmers, households and others to employ such applicants for relief at a rate of headline wages negotiated and set by the parish. It depended not on the services, but on the wants of the applicants: the employers being repaid out of the poor rate all they advanced in wages beyond a very low-wage amount. Variants of the Roundsman system operated and co-existed from parish-to-parish and sometimes depending on type of labour.

The Poor Relief Act 1601 was an Act of the Parliament of England. The Act for the Relief of the Poor 1601, popularly known as the Elizabethan Poor Law, "43rd Elizabeth" or the Old Poor Law was passed in 1601 and created a poor law system for England and Wales.

In English and British history, poor relief refers to government and ecclesiastical action to relieve poverty. Over the centuries, various authorities have needed to decide whose poverty deserves relief and also who should bear the cost of helping the poor. Alongside ever-changing attitudes towards poverty, many methods have been attempted to answer these questions. Since the early 16th century legislation on poverty enacted by the Parliament of England, poor relief has developed from being little more than a systematic means of punishment into a complex system of government-funded support and protection, especially following the creation in the 1940s of the welfare state. Poor relief will control crime if adequately given.

The Union Chargeability Act 1865 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that was passed after the Poor Law Amendment Act 1834. The intention of the act was to broaden the base of funding for relief provided by the Poor Laws.

The Metropolitan Poor Act 1867 was an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom, the first in a series of major reforms that led to the gradual separation of the Poor Law's medical functions from its poor relief functions. It also led to the creation of a separate administrative authority the Metropolitan Asylums Board.

Poor Law policy after the New Poor Law concerns the time period c. 1847–1900 after the implementation of the Poor Law Amendment Act until the beginnings of the decline of the Poor Law system at the start of the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Railroad (New Hampshire)</span>

The Northern Railroad was a U.S. railroad in central New Hampshire. Originally opened from Concord to West Lebanon in 1847, the Northern Railroad become part of the Boston and Maine system by 1890.

The Erection of Cottages Act 1588 was an Act of the Parliament of England that prohibited the construction—in most parts of England—of any dwelling that did not have at least 4 acres assigned to it out of the freehold or other heritable land belonging to the person responsible for its construction.

The Scottish poorhouse, occasionally referred to as a workhouse, provided accommodation for the destitute and poor in Scotland. The term poorhouse was almost invariably used to describe the institutions in that country, as unlike the regime in their workhouse counterparts in neighbouring England and Wales residents were not usually required to labour in return for their upkeep.

Georgiana was launched in 1791. She served as a merchantman, packet ship for the British East India Company (EIC), a whaler, a warship of the navy of the United States of America, and a merchant vessel again. She was sold after being condemned in 1818 as leaky.

Amelia Wilson was built in France under another name and captured by the British in 1809. Her new owners renamed her and she became a West Indiaman. She later became a whaler and was wrecked in 1833 on her fifth whaling voyage.

The seal of Cincinnati is the official insignia of the city of Cincinnati, Ohio, in the United States. Adopted in 1819, the seal incorporates scales, a sword, and a caduceus. The seal is featured prominently in the flag of Cincinnati and the insignia of city agencies and institutions.

HMS Hazard was launched in 1749 For the Royal Navy as brig-rigged sloop. She had a 30-plus year career with the navy, during which she captured several small French privateers. At the end of the American War of Independence, the navy sold her and she became the merchantman Joseph. After almost a decade as a merchantman trading with Spain, a new owner made a whaler of her. She made seven whaling voyages and was no longer listed after 1804, two years after her return from her last whaling voyage.

Salisbury was built at Havana c.1761 under another name. She first appeared under British ownership in 1781 as a West Indiaman. In 1785 she became the northern whale fishery whaler Rebecca. In 1787 new owners renamed her Harpooner and she was briefly a northern whaler in the Davis Strait. She was wrecked in 1789.

References

Bicheno, James Ebenezer (1817). An Inquiry into the Nature of Benevolence. London: Rowland Hunter. hdl:2027/umn.31951002316716x.
Cloe, Lyman H. (April 1939). "Unemployment Compensation Background: Some Extra-Legal Considerations" . University of Kansas City Law Review. 7 (3): 147–172. Retrieved 22 February 2016– via HeinOnline.
Cook, Chris; Stevenson, John (2001). The Longman Handbook of Modern British History, 1714–2001 (4th ed.). London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-582-42394-7.
Earle, Alice Morse (1896). Curious Punishments of Bygone Days. Chicago: Herbert S. Stone & Co. hdl:2027/hvd.32044020031191.
Earle, Alice Morse (1910) [First published 1903]. Two Centuries of Costume in America: MDCXX–MDCCCXX (New ed.). New York: Macmillan Company. hdl:2027/mdp.39015062306702.
Higginbotham, Peter (2012). "Badging the Poor". The Workhouse Encyclopedia. Stroud, England: History Press. ISBN 978-0-7524-7719-0.
Jerram, Charles (1818). Considerations on the Impolicy and Pernicious Tendency of the Poor Laws. London: Rest Fenner. hdl:2027/ien.35556000115055.
Linder, Marc (1989). "The Joint Employment Doctrine: Clarifying Joint Legislative-Judicial Confusion" . Hamline Journal of Law and Public Policy. 10 (2): 321–345. Retrieved 20 February 2016– via HeinOnline.
Nicoll, S. W. (1818). A Summary View of the Report and Evidence relative to the Poor Laws Published by Order of the House of Commons, with Observations and Suggestions. York: W. Alexander. hdl:2027/umn.31951002094003h.
Nolan, Michael (1805). "Of the Year's Service". A Treatise of the Laws for the Relief and Settlement of the Poor. Vol. 1. London: A. Strahan. pp. 214–215. hdl:2027/ien.35556003815461.
Paterson, James (1877). "Protection of the Body against Want and Destitution". Commentaries on the Liberty of the Subject and the Laws of England relating to the Security of the Person. Vol. 2. London: Macmillan & Co. hdl:2027/hvd.32044090361494.
Robson, Ruthann (2013). "Beyond Sumptuary: Constitutionalism, Clothes, and Bodies in Anglo-American Law, 1215–1789" . British Journal of American Legal Studies. 2 (2): 477–509. Retrieved 20 February 2016– via HeinOnline.
Ruggles, Thomas (1793). The History of the Poor; their Rights, Duties, and the Laws Respecting them: In a Series of Letters. Vol. 1. London: J. Deighton. hdl:2027/mdp.39015068047839.
Townsend, Joseph (1817) [First published 1786]. A Dissertation on the Poor Laws. London: Ridgways. hdl:2027/njp.32101058836162.

v t e Poor laws of the British Isles
Poor laws by territory	England and Wales Scotland Ireland Isle of Man	Nantwich workhouse
Old Poor Law	Vagabonds and Beggars Act 1494 Tudor poor laws Poor Relief Act 1597 Poor Relief Act 1601 Poor Relief Act 1662 Relief of the Poor Act 1696 Poor Relief Act 1722 Relief of the Poor Act 1782 House of correction Overseer of the poor Poor rate Poor relief Buttock mail
Relief systems	Outdoor relief Speenhamland Labour Rate Roundsman Committee for the Relief of the Black Poor
New Poor Law	Royal commission (1832) Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 Poor Law (Scotland) Act 1845 Less eligibility Workhouse Workhouse test Board of guardians Outdoor Labour Test Order Outdoor Relief Prohibitory Order Poor law unions Opposition Book of Murder Scottish poorhouse
Changes after 1834	Poor Law Commission Poor Law Board Local Government Board Andover workhouse scandal Huddersfield workhouse scandal Union Chargeability Act
Decline and abolition	Liberal welfare reforms Royal Commission (1905–09) Majority Report Minority Report Interwar poverty National Assistance Act 1948
Other	Christmas Day in the Workhouse Historiography of the Poor Laws Timeline of the English Poor Law system Poor Relief Act List of poor law unions in England List of poor law unions in Wales List of Irish poor law unions

Relief of the Poor Act 1696

Contents

Badging the poor

Year's service rule

See also

Notes

Related Research Articles

References

Further reading

Statutes

Texts and treatises