Religious thought of Edmund Burke

Last updated
Edmund Burke, who praised Christianity's ability to strengthen British society Edmund Burke by Sir Joshua Reynolds.jpg
Edmund Burke, who praised Christianity's ability to strengthen British society

The religious thought of Edmund Burke includes published works by Edmund Burke and commentary on the same. Burke's religious thought was grounded in his belief that religion is the foundation of civil society. [1] He sharply criticized deism and atheism and emphasized Christianity as a vehicle of social progress. [2] Born in Ireland to a Protestant father and Catholic mother, Burke vigorously defended the Church of England, but also demonstrated sensitivity to Catholic concerns. [3] He linked the conservation of a state religion with the preservation of citizens’ constitutional liberties and highlighted Christianity’s benefits not only to the believer’s soul but also to political arrangements. [3]

Contents

Early views

Burke's early essays "Religion of No Efficacy Considered as a State Engine" and "Religion" criticize contemporary efforts to reduce religion to a social and political instrument. [4] "The Principle of Religion", Burke wrote, "is that God attends to our actions to reward and punish them". [5] According to Burke, religion is ultimately something mysterious. [6] It cannot exist without a personal God who places responsibilities on his creation. [7] Burke claimed that "Moral Duties are included in Religion, and enforced by it". [8] Burke's identification of religion as the source of morality is a reoccurring theme throughout his work. [9]

Social benefits of Christianity compared with deism

Ian Harris has observed that Burke "emphasized the social benefits of Christianity, rather than its truth". [10] Burke considered Christianity the source of civilization and appealed to the Christian tradition for both eternal salvation and human welfare in this life. [11] Although Burke "presumed the truth of Christianity", he did not try to explain its central doctrines. [12] This was consistent with Burke’s overall approach to religion which was essentially political and philosophical rather than theological. [11]

Burke's view that religion is the source of morality led him to view its absence as a perilous possibility. [13] His first published book was A Vindication of Natural Society and satirizes the deism of his contemporary Viscount Bolingbroke. [14] Drawing a distinction between revealed religions (those that believe in divinely inspired scripture) and natural religion or deism, Burke’s pseudo-Bolingbroke argues that revealed religion and civil society are similarly peppered with evils. If the remedy to revealed religion is natural religion, then the solution to civil society is natural society. [15] By connecting natural religion with a primitive state of nature, Burke suggests the anti-social and degenerating implications of deism. [16] Burke considered religion and morality "sublime principles" and called for "religious establishments [...] that many continually revive and support them". [17] In this way, Burke envisioned Christianity as "contributing directly to the cohesion and improvement of society". [12] Burke argued that "the consecration of the state by a state religious establishment" was necessary to secure the freedom of Englishmen. [18] According to Burke, only a state-sanctioned religion could effectively instill citizens with a sense of awe and responsibility for their actions. [18] A religion connected with the state was essential to making people realize that "they are to account for their conduct [...] to the one great Master, Author and Founder of society". [18]

Pluralism and toleration

Although Burke was a forceful defender of the Church of England, his view that a revealed religion was indispensable to a society’s progress was not limited to Christianity. [19] In a speech before the House of Commons, Burke commended the "Hindoo Religion" for contributing to the "flourishing" of India. [20] Similarly, he lauded Islamic governments for having the "double sanction of law and religion". [21] Ian Harris cautions that these praises do not imply that Burke "entertained relativism about religious truth". Instead, Harris argues that these statements suggest Burke believed "that the religion which has become bound up with a society is the one that suits it". [22] Burke also spoke in support of Catholics and dissenters from the Church of England. [23] He argued that because the Church was "built up with the strong and stable matter of the gospel of liberty", it had nothing to fear from allowing other Christian groups to worship as they wished. Burke asserted that the Church of England’s "security of her own doctrines" made it possible to establish legal acceptance for Protestants and Catholics. [23] "Toleration", Burke argued, "so far from being an attack upon Christianity, becomes the best and surest support that possibly can be given to it". [23] However, Burke fiercely defended the Church establishment from attacks from within the Church of England. He publicly opposed the petition of several clergymen from the Church of England who asked to be relieved from subscription to the articles of the Act of Uniformity 1662. [24] Burke advocated allowing English dissenters to practice Christianity the way they saw fit, but he briskly opposed efforts to subvert church authorities. [25]

Religion and the French Revolution

Burke’s criticisms of the French Revolution reiterated his longstanding view that revealed religion is an integral part of a civilized society. [22] He sharply condemned the confiscation of Church property by the revolutionaries and claimed that their nonreligious views were "against, not only our reason, but our instincts". [17] Burke predicted that if France rejected Catholicism, "some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition might take the place of it". [17]

Harris observes that Burke discerned clear religious features in the French Revolution. [26] As the Revolution turned more radical and entered its international phrase, Burke thought of it "as no mere exercise in extending French rule, but instead as a crusade to destroy Christianity in Europe". [26] "In a drunken delirium", Burke wrote, France risked "uncover[ing] our nakedness". [13] The practice of a natural religion without revelation implied retrogression to "a savage and incoherent mode of life". [27] Burke’s mature thought on religion reveals a remarkable consistency throughout his long career. [11] For Burke, the French Revolution was a vivid example of the catastrophic consequences of deism which he had ridiculed in A Vindication of Natural Society more than thirty years before. [16] The inadequacy of natural religion for both personal salvation and civil society are enduring themes of Burke’s thought. Burke believed that only revealed religions, especially Christianity, offer the possibility of social and political improvement. [11] Linking morality and religion, Burke believed that the former could not exist without the latter. According to Burke, only institutional churches can effectively uphold these sublime principles and enable the fulfillment of man's obligations both to his neighbors and to God.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<i>A Vindication of the Rights of Woman</i> Philosophic feminist book by Mary Wollstonecraft

A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: with Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects (1792), written by British proto-feminist Mary Wollstonecraft (1759–1797), is one of the earliest works of feminist philosophy. In it, Wollstonecraft responds to those educational and political theorists of the eighteenth century who did not believe women should receive a rational education. She argues that women ought to have an education commensurate with their position in society, claiming that women are essential to the nation because they educate its children and because they could be "companions" to their husbands, rather than mere wives. Instead of viewing women as ornaments to society or property to be traded in marriage, Wollstonecraft maintains that they are human beings deserving of the same fundamental rights as men.

Deism is the philosophical position and rationalistic theology that generally rejects revelation as a source of divine knowledge, and asserts that empirical reason and observation of the natural world are exclusively logical, reliable, and sufficient to determine the existence of a Supreme Being as the creator of the universe. Or more simply stated, Deism is the belief in the existence of God solely based on rational thought without any reliance on revealed religions or religious authority. Deism emphasizes the concept of natural theology.

Edmund Burke Irish statesman and political theorist (1729–1797)

Edmund Burke was an Irish statesman, economist, and philosopher. Born in Dublin, Burke served as a member of Parliament (MP) between 1766 and 1794 in the House of Commons of Great Britain with the Whig Party.

Mary Wollstonecraft English writer and intellectual (1759–1797)

Mary Wollstonecraft was an English writer, philosopher, and advocate of women's rights. Until the late 20th century, Wollstonecraft's life, which encompassed several unconventional personal relationships at the time, received more attention than her writing. Today Wollstonecraft is regarded as one of the founding feminist philosophers, and feminists often cite both her life and her works as important influences.

<i>The Age of Reason</i> Work by Thomas Paine, published 1794, 1795 and 1807

The Age of Reason; Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology is a work by English and American political activist Thomas Paine, arguing for the philosophical position of deism. It follows in the tradition of 18th-century British deism, and challenges institutionalized religion and the legitimacy of the Bible. It was published in three parts in 1794, 1795, and 1807.

Joseph Priestley English chemist, theologian, educator, and political theorist (1733-1804)

Joseph Priestley was an English chemist, natural philosopher, separatist theologian, grammarian, multi-subject educator, and liberal political theorist who published over 150 works.

Priestley Riots English riots regarding Joseph Priestley

The Priestley Riots took place from 14 July to 17 July 1791 in Birmingham, England; the rioters' main targets were religious dissenters, most notably the politically and theologically controversial Joseph Priestley. Both local and national issues stirred the passions of the rioters, from disagreements over public library book purchases, to controversies over Dissenters' attempts to gain full civil rights and their support of the French Revolution.

Edward Stillingfleet

Edward Stillingfleet was a British Christian theologian and scholar. Considered an outstanding preacher as well as a strong polemical writer defending Anglicanism, Stillingfleet was known as "the beauty of holiness" for his good looks in the pulpit, and was called by John Hough "the ablest man of his time".

<i>Reflections on the Revolution in France</i> Political pamphlet by Edmund Burke, published November 1790

Reflections on the Revolution in France is a political pamphlet written by the Irish statesman Edmund Burke and published in November 1790. It is fundamentally a contrast of the French Revolution to that time with the unwritten British Constitution and, to a significant degree, an argument with British supporters and interpreters of the events in France. One of the best-known intellectual attacks against the French Revolution, Reflections is a defining tract of modern conservatism as well as an important contribution to international theory. The Norton Anthology of English Literature describes Reflections as becoming the "most eloquent statement of British conservatism favoring monarchy, aristocracy, property, hereditary succession, and the wisdom of the ages." Above all else, it has been one of the defining efforts of Edmund Burke's transformation of "traditionalism into a self-conscious and fully conceived political philosophy of conservatism".

<i>A Vindication of the Rights of Men</i> Book by Mary Wollstonecraft

A Vindication of the Rights of Men, in a Letter to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke; Occasioned by His Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) is a political pamphlet, written by the 18th-century British liberal feminist Mary Wollstonecraft, which attacks aristocracy and advocates republicanism. Wollstonecraft's was the first response in a pamphlet war sparked by the publication of Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), a defense of constitutional monarchy, aristocracy, and the Church of England.

A Vindication of Natural Society: or, a View of the Miseries and Evils arising to Mankind from every Species of Artificial Society is a work by Edmund Burke published in 1756. It is a satire of Lord Bolingbroke's deism. Burke confronted Bolingbroke not in the sphere of religion but civil society and government, arguing that his arguments against revealed religion could apply to all institutions. So close to Bolingbroke's style was the work, that Burke's ironic intention was missed by some readers, leading Burke in his preface to the second edition (1757) to make plain that it was a satire. Nonetheless, this work was considered by William Godwin to be the first literary expression of philosophical anarchism.

Criticism of atheism is criticism of the concepts, validity, or impact of atheism, including associated political and social implications. Criticisms include positions based on the history of science, philosophical and logical criticisms, findings in both the natural and social sciences, theistic apologetic arguments, arguments pertaining to ethics and morality, the effects of atheism on the individual, or the assumptions that underpin atheism.

Joseph Priestley and Dissent British clergyman and intellectual of the late 18th century

Joseph Priestley was a British natural philosopher, political theorist, clergyman, theologian, and educator. He was one of the most influential Dissenters of the late 18th-century.

<i>Essay on the First Principles of Government</i>

Essay on the First Principles of Government (1768) is an early work of modern liberal political theory by 18th-century British polymath Joseph Priestley.

Atheism during the Age of Enlightenment Aspect of history

Atheism, as defined by the entry in Diderot and d'Alembert's Encyclopédie, is "the opinion of those who deny the existence of a God in the world. The simple ignorance of God doesn't constitute atheism. To be charged with the odious title of atheism one must have the notion of God and reject it." In the period of the Enlightenment, avowed and open atheism was made possible by the advance of religious toleration, but was also far from encouraged.

Deism, the religious attitude typical of the Enlightenment, especially in France and England, holds that the only way the existence of God can be proven is to combine the application of reason with observation of the world. A Deist is defined as "One who believes in the existence of a God or Supreme Being but denies revealed religion, basing his belief on the light of nature and reason." Deism was often synonymous with so-called natural religion because its principles are drawn from nature and human reasoning. In contrast to Deism there are many cultural religions or revealed religions, such as Judaism, Trinitarian Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and others, which believe in supernatural intervention of God in the world; while Deism denies any supernatural intervention and emphasizes that the world is operated by natural laws of the Supreme Being.

Isaac Kramnick was an American historian, social scientist and the Richard J. Schwartz Professor of Government at Cornell University. He was a subject-matter expert on English and American political thought and history.

The ancient constitution of England was a 17th-century political theory about the common law, and the antiquity of the House of Commons, used at the time in particular to oppose the royal prerogative. It was developed initially by Sir Edward Coke, in his law reports; and has been analysed in modern times by J. G. A. Pocock in The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law.

<i>A Discourse on the Love of Our Country</i>

A Discourse on the Love of Our Country is a speech and pamphlet delivered by Richard Price in England in 1789, in support of the French Revolution, equating it with the Glorious Revolution a century earlier in England. This set off the Revolution Controversy, an exchange of arguments via pamphlet between those supporting or opposing the idea of the French Revolution.

Catholicism and Deism are two theologies that have opposed each other in matters of the role of God in the world. Deism is the philosophical belief which posits that although God exists as the uncaused First Cause, responsible for the creation of the universe, God does not interact directly with that subsequently created world. As deism is not organized, its adherents differ widely in important matters of belief, but all are in agreement in denying the significance of revelation in Catholic Scripture and Tradition. Deists argue against Catholicism by either, only considering Scripture to be a helpful moral tool, or denying: its divine character, the infallibility of the Church and Traditions, and the validity of its evidence as a complete manifestation of the will of God. Deism is first considered to have manifested itself in England towards the latter end of the seventeenth century.

References

  1. ↑ Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (London: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1964), 87.
  2. ↑ Ian Harris, "Burke and Religion", in David Dwan and Christopher J Insole eds., The Cambridge Companion to Edmund Burke (Cambridge University Press, 2012), 103.
  3. 1 2 Harris, 98.
  4. ↑ Edmund Burke, "Religion of No efficacy considered as a State Engine" in H. V. F. Somerset ed., A Note-book of Edmund Burke (Cambridge University Press, 1957), 67.
  5. ↑ A Note-book, 67.
  6. ↑ A Note-book, 68.
  7. ↑ Edmund Burke, "Religion" in A Note-book, 70.
  8. ↑ Edmund Burke, "Religion".
  9. ↑ Harris, 92.
  10. ↑ Harris, 103.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Harris, 103
  12. 1 2 Harris, 94
  13. 1 2 Reflections, 87.
  14. ↑ Edmund Burke, “A Vindication of Natural Society,” in Isaac Kramnick ed, The Portable Edmund Burke (New York: Penguin Books, 1999), 29.
  15. ↑ Harris, 96.
  16. 1 2 Harris, 96
  17. 1 2 3 Reflections, 88.
  18. 1 2 3 Reflections, 89.
  19. ↑ Harris, 99.
  20. ↑ Quoted in Harris, 99.
  21. ↑ Edmund Burke, “Speeches on the Impeachment of Warren Hastings,” in Isaac Kramnick ed, The Portable Edmund Burke (New York: Penguin Books, 1999), 397.
  22. 1 2 Harris, 100.
  23. 1 2 3 Edmund Burke, "Speech on Relief of Protestant Dissenters" in Louis I. Bredvold and Ralph G, Ross eds., The Philosophy of Edmund Burke (Ann Arbor: The University of Mitchigan Press, 1960), 76–77.
  24. ↑ Edmund Burke, “Speech on the Acts of Uniformity” in Louis I. Bredvold and Ralph G, Ross eds., The Philosophy of Edmund Burke (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1960), 119.
  25. ↑ Edmund Burke, “Speech on the Acts of Uniformity” in Louis I. Bredvold and Ralph G, Ross eds., The Philosophy of Edmund Burke (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1960), 119.
  26. 1 2 Harris, 102.
  27. ↑ Quoted in Harris, 102.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.