Rural internet

Last updated

Rural Internet describes the characteristics of Internet service in rural areas (also referred to as "the country" or "countryside"), which are settled places outside towns and cities. Inhabitants live in villages, hamlets, on farms and in other isolated houses. Mountains and other terrain can impede rural Internet access.

Contents

Internet service in many rural areas is provided over voiceband by 56k modem. Poor-quality telephone lines, many of which were installed or last upgraded between the 1930s and the 1960s, often limit the speed of the network to bit rates of 26 kbit/s or less. Since many of these lines serve relatively few customers, phone company maintenance and speed of repair of these lines has degraded and their upgrade for modern quality requirements is unlikely. This results in a digital divide.

High-speed, wireless Internet service is becoming increasingly common in rural areas. Here, service providers deliver Internet service over radio-frequency via special radio-equipped antennas.[ citation needed ]

Methods for broadband Internet access in rural areas include:

Digital divide

Scholarship on the topic of the digital divide has shifted from an understanding of people who do and do not have access to the internet to an analysis of the quality of internet access. Because opting out of internet activity is no longer a choice with internet-only customer service, online banking, and online schooling, internet access has become an increasing need in rural communities with inadequate infrastructure. [2]

Although government programs such as E-rate provisions provide internet connection to schools and libraries under the U.S. federal government, more general internet access to a broader community has not been directly addressed in policy. The provision of "national" internet services tends to favor urban metropolitan regions. [3] For a long time, even, many within the U.S. considered the internet to be a luxury. In 2001, then FCC Chair Michael Powell said, “I think there’s a Mercedes divide. I’d like to have one. I can’t afford one” when asked about solutions to shrinking the digital divide. At the time, the internet was still largely new, as less than half of the U.S. did not have access to any home internet. [2] In 2021, 77% of Americans have home broadband according to the most recent Pew Research Center survey. [4] The attitude in the U.S. has largely shifted since Powell's remarks, however, as under the current administration and President Joe Biden there is a common belief that "broadband is infrastructure" and that is must be treated as such. [5]

The digital divide is even more prominent in developing countries, where physical access to internet services are at a much lower rate. While developed countries such as the U.S. face the challenge of providing universal service (ensuring that everyone has access to internet service in the home), developing countries face the challenge of providing universal access (ensuring that everyone has the opportunity to make use of the internet). [6] For example, in Egypt there are only about six phone lines per 100 people, with less than two lines per 100 people in rural areas, which makes it even more difficult for people to access the internet. [6]

In the United States

The United States Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service has provided numerous studies and data on the Internet in rural America. One such article from the Agricultural Outlook magazine, Communications & the Internet in Rural America, summarizes internet uses in rural areas of the United States in 2002. It indicates, "Internet use by rural and urban households has also increased significantly during the 1990s, so significantly that it has one of the fastest rates of adoption for any household service." [7]

Another area for inclusion of the Internet is American farming. One study reviewed data from 2003 and found that "56 percent of farm operators used the Internet while 31 percent of rural workers used it at their place of work." [8] In later years challenges to economical rural telecommunications remain. People in inner city areas are closer together, so the access network to connect them is shorter and cheaper to build and maintain, while rural areas require more equipment per customer. However, even with this challenge the demand for services continues to grow. [9]

In 2011 the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed to use the Universal Service Fund to subsidize rural broadband Internet services. In 2019, the FCC estimated that only 73.6% of the rural population had access to broadband services at 25 Mbps in 2017, compared to 98.3% of the population in urban areas. [10] However, many studies have contested FCC findings, claiming a greater number of Americans are without access to internet services at sufficient speeds. [11] [12] For instance, in 2019 Pew Research Center found that only about two-thirds of rural Americans claimed to have a broadband internet connection at home, and although the gap in mobile technology ownership between rural and urban adults has narrowed, rural adults remain less likely to own these devices. [13]

One study in particular examined the ways in which inaccessibility for rural and "quasi-rural" residents affects their daily life, conceptualizing issues of accessibility as a form of socioeconomic inequity. [14] By using Illinois as a case study - a state with both urban and rural environments—the authors demonstrate how the rural-urban digital divide negatively impacts those that live in areas that fall between the two distinct categories of rural and urban. Interviews with residents from Illinois describe "missed pockets," or areas in which service installation is not available or far too expensive. [14] This inaccessibility leads many to experience sentiments of social isolation as residents feel disconnected from current events, cultural trends, and even close friends and family members.

Internet access inequalities are further deepened by public policy and commercial investment. In 2003, The Information Society published an article explaining how exchange areas and local access transport areas (LATAs) arrange citizens into markets for telecommunication companies, which centralizes access rather than encouraging businesses to cater to more remote communities. [15] These areas were created through regulatory measures intended to ensure greater access and are perpetuated by investment patterns as more disparate communities hold less potential for profits, thus creating "missed pockets." [14] [15]

In Canada

In Canada, when pressed by Member of Parliament David de Burgh Graham, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities did not see access to the internet a right. [16] Telecommunications co-operatives like Antoine-Labelle provide an alternative to big Internet Service Providers. [17] [18]

In Spain

In Spain, the Guifi.net project has been for some people the only alternative to get access to the Internet. Usually, neighbors are the responsible to collect the necessary money to buy the network equipment that will do a Wireless link with another zone that already has internet access. There have also been cases in which the own city council has invested in the infrastructure.

In the United Kingdom

In the UK, the government aimed to provide superfast broadband (speeds of 24 Mbit/s or more) to 95% of the country by 2017. [19] In 2014, a study by the Oxford Internet Institute found that in areas less than 30 km (20 mi) from large cities, internet speed dropped below 2 Mbit/s, the speed designated as "adequate" by the government. [20]

A CableFree CPE Radio installed for Rural Internet in The Cotswolds, UK CableFree Pearl CPE Installed in The Cotswolds - V-Closeup.jpg
A CableFree CPE Radio installed for Rural Internet in The Cotswolds, UK

Frustrated by the slow progress being made by private telecoms companies, some rural communities have built their own broadband networks, such as the B4RN initiative. [21]

In India

India has the second-biggest online market globally, yet a large portion of its populace – almost 700 million individuals – are detached. Indian internet network access AirJaldi has collaborated with Microsoft to give reasonable online access to rural areas. Dependable broadband associations are imperative for many youngsters who are being homeschooled during the pandemic for COVID-19. That may change as Indian web access provider, AirJaldi, is widening access through an imaginative undertaking with worldwide tech giant Microsoft. [22]

Internet of Things

Due to poor telecommunication access in most rural areas, low-energy solutions such as those offered by Internet of Things networks are seen as a cost-effective solution well-adapted to agricultural environments. [23] [24] Tasks such as controlling livestock conditions and numbers, the state of crops, and pests are progressively being taken over by m2m communications. Companies such as Sigfox, Cisco Systems and Fujitsu are delving into the agricultural market, offering innovative solutions to common problems in countries such as the U.S., Japan, Ireland and Uruguay. [25] [26] [27] [28]

Innovation and Solutions

There is increasing conversation around the growing social necessity of being connected in today's world and moreover, growing social expectation that one is connected either with at home broadband, reliable cell-service, and at least email access. Currently, rural areas often depend on small, unreliable ISP providers and scrape by "siphoning from surplus data and bandwidth capacity, creating their own systems of redundancy, or (in some cases) launching community-based, local ISP when large incumbent providers fail to show an interest in the area." [2]

Many of the difficulties faced by rural communities are "geo-policy barriers," defined as "chokepoints [or] mechanisms of control created through the interaction of geography, market forces, and public policies" that constrict not just access, but "also construct both communication and communities." [29] In the US, regulatory mandates have helped extend basic telecommunications to rural areas while mitigating market failure. However, despite efforts from the government, the telecommunications industry has stayed relatively monopolized therefore little competition has resulted in basic telecommunications without adequate connectivity for the developing needs of rural citizens. One state-based effort that has proved successful in adequately connecting Americans are EAS, or "expanded area service", programs, which "generally reduce intra-LATAS [local access transport areas] long-distance costs between specific exchanges or throughout a contiguous geographic area." [29] In regards to Internet access, one of the most important EAS programs creates "flat-rate calling zones that allow remote customers to reach an Internet service provider in a more populous area." [29]

Issues of rural connectivity have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and reveal how "poor management of the Universal Service Fund, which subsidizes phone and internet access in rural areas, has meant some companies get the money without delivering on the promised numbers of households served or service quality." [30] Therefore, one immediate fix to rural connectivity would be accountability within U.S.F programs and arguably, more funding. While governments begin pondering questions such as, "is Internet access a right?", ideas on how to approach this issue fall along political party lines. Mainly, Democrats believe more government funding would help connect rural Americans while Republicans are backing new 5G mobile Internet technology to replace home Internet lines and solve access gaps. [31] These arguments are very similar to political arguments about "electricity and phone service in the early 1900s." [30]

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) recently released an overview of initiatives based on "bridging the digital divide for all Americans," [32] some of these include:

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "Microsoft wants all of rural America to get high-speed broadband". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on 2017-07-14. Retrieved 2017-07-15.
  2. 1 2 3 Burrell, Jenna (2018-06-01). "Thinking relationally about digital inequality in rural regions of the U.S." First Monday. doi: 10.5210/fm.v23i6.8376 . ISSN   1396-0466. S2CID   49640135. Archived from the original on 2020-10-22. Retrieved 2020-10-20.
  3. ↑ Strover, Sharon (2001-06-01). "Rural internet connectivity". Telecommunications Policy. 25 (5): 331–347. doi:10.1016/S0308-5961(01)00008-8. ISSN   0308-5961.
  4. ↑ "Demographics of Internet and Home Broadband Usage in the United States". Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Archived from the original on 2021-08-30. Retrieved 2021-11-14.
  5. ↑ "Broadband is infrastructure". Twitter. Archived from the original on 2021-11-14. Retrieved 2021-11-14.
  6. 1 2 Warschauer, Mark. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. The MIT Press.
  7. ↑ Archived 2020-01-11 at the Wayback Machine "Communications & the Internet in Rural America." (June–July 2002). Agricultural Outlook . pp. 23-26. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
  8. ↑ Archived 2016-06-17 at the Wayback Machine "Internet on the Range." (February 2006). Amber Waves. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
  9. ↑ Archived 2019-12-15 at the Wayback Machine Stenberg, Peter L. (July 2006). "Infrastructure in Rural Areas: Telecommunications." ‘’Profitwise News and Views Special Edition’’. pp 33-36. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Retrieved December 30, 2008.
  10. ↑ https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/FCC-19-44A1.pdf Archived 2020-10-17 at the Wayback Machine [ bare URL PDF ]
  11. ↑ "FCC Underestimates Americans Unserved by Broadband Internet by 50%". BroadbandNow. Archived from the original on 2022-03-07. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  12. ↑ "It's time for a new approach for mapping broadband data to better serve Americans". Microsoft on the Issues. 2019-04-08. Archived from the original on 2020-10-22. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  13. ↑ "Digital gap between rural and nonrural America persists". Pew Research Center. Archived from the original on 2020-10-20. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  14. 1 2 3 Schmidt, Danielle; Power, Séamus A. (2020-08-21). "Offline World: the Internet as Social Infrastructure among the Unconnected in Quasi-Rural Illinois". Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 55 (2): 371–385. doi: 10.1007/s12124-020-09574-9 . ISSN   1932-4502. PMC   7442287 . PMID   32827073.
  15. 1 2 Nicholas, Kyle (September 2003). "Geo-Policy Barriers and Rural Internet Access: The Regulatory Role in Constructing the Digital Divide". The Information Society. 19 (4): 287–295. doi:10.1080/01972240309489. ISSN   0197-2243. S2CID   12221424.
  16. ↑ "House of Commons Industry Committee on Nov. 30th, 2017". openparliament.ca. Archived from the original on 2019-07-31. Retrieved 2019-07-31.
  17. ↑ "Canada's House of Commons Debates of May 22nd, 2018". openparliament.ca. Archived from the original on 2019-07-31. Retrieved 2019-07-31.
  18. ↑ "Canada's House of Commons Industry Committee on May 16th, 2019". openparliament.ca. Archived from the original on 2019-07-31. Retrieved 2019-07-31.
  19. ↑ "Broadband Delivery UK - Detailed guidance - GOV.UK". www.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 2016-01-22. Retrieved 2016-01-15.
  20. ↑ "Outside the cities and towns, rural Britain's internet is firmly stuck in the 20th century". The Conversation. 20 October 2014. Archived from the original on 2016-02-08. Retrieved 2016-01-15.
  21. ↑ Moss, Sebastian (21 September 2015). "Want rural superfast broadband? Do it yourself". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2015-11-24. Retrieved 2016-01-15.
  22. ↑ "How Microsoft is helping to bring broadband to rural India". World Economic Forum. 3 February 2021. Archived from the original on 2021-04-28. Retrieved 2021-04-04.
  23. ↑ Alleven, Monica. "Sigfox, Texas Instruments collaborate to deliver Internet of Things solutions". FierceWireless. Archived from the original on 2015-12-27. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  24. ↑ Newenham, Pamela. "New dawn for farm tech: sowing the Internet of Things into agriculture". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 9 April 2017. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  25. ↑ EGERTON-READ, Seb. "INTERNET OF THINGS COULD BE A PART OF NEW ERA FOR FARMING". Circulate News. Archived from the original on 28 May 2015. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  26. ↑ Crozier, Ry. "Why food could be the future of the internet of things". itNews. Archived from the original on 22 July 2015. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  27. ↑ Goldstein, Phil. "Cisco: Wi-Fi, cellular data to make up 67% of all IP traffic in 2019". FierceWireless. Archived from the original on 2015-05-28. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  28. ↑ Davies, Wyre (26 November 2014). "Uruguay's world first in cattle farming". BBC News. Archived from the original on 14 February 2018. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
  29. 1 2 3 Nicholas, Kyle (January 19, 2011). "Geo-Policy Barriers and Rural Internet Access". The Information Society. 19: 287–295. doi:10.1080/01972240309489. S2CID   12221424.
  30. 1 2 Ovide, Shira (2020-05-20). "Why Rural America's Digital Divide Persists". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2020-10-23. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  31. ↑ Holmes, Allan (2018-03-02). "5G Cell Service Is Coming. Who Decides Where It Goes? (Published 2018)". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-10-21.
  32. ↑ "Bridging The Digital Divide For All Americans". Federal Communications Commission. 2017-07-27. Archived from the original on 2020-10-24. Retrieved 2020-10-21.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wireless broadband</span> Telecommunications technology

Wireless broadband is a telecommunications technology that provides high-speed wireless Internet access or computer networking access over a wide area. The term encompasses both fixed and mobile broadband.

Telecommunications in Ireland operate in a regulated competitive market that provides customers with a wide array of advanced digital services. This article explores Ireland's telecommunications infrastructure including: fixed and mobile networks, The voice, data and Internet services, cable television, developments in next-generation networks and broadcast networks for radio and television.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Communications Commission</span> Independent U.S. government agency

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agency of the United States government that regulates communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable across the United States. The FCC maintains jurisdiction over the areas of broadband access, fair competition, radio frequency use, media responsibility, public safety, and homeland security.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet service provider</span> Organization that provides access to the Internet

An Internet service provider (ISP) is an organization that provides a myriad of services related to accessing, using, managing, or participating in the Internet. ISPs can be organized in various forms, such as commercial, community-owned, non-profit, or otherwise privately owned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Broadband</span> Data transmission concept

In telecommunications, broadband or high speed is the wide-bandwidth data transmission that exploits signals at a wide spread of frequencies or several different simultaneous frequencies, and is used in fast Internet access. The transmission medium can be coaxial cable, optical fiber, wireless Internet (radio), twisted pair cable, or satellite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Telecommunications policy of the United States</span>

The telecommunications policy of the United States is a framework of law directed by government and the regulatory commissions, most notably the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Two landmark acts prevail today, the Communications Act of 1934 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The latter was intended to revise the first act and specifically to foster competition in the telecommunications industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet access</span> Individual connection to the Internet

Internet access is a facility or service that provides connectivity for a computer, a computer network, or other network device to the Internet, and for individuals or organizations to access or use applications such as email and the World Wide Web. Internet access is offered for sale by an international hierarchy of Internet service providers (ISPs) using various networking technologies. At the retail level, many organizations, including municipal entities, also provide cost-free access to the general public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wireless Internet service provider</span> Internet service provider with a network based on wireless networking

A wireless Internet service provider (WISP) is an Internet service provider with a network based on wireless networking. Technology may include commonplace Wi-Fi wireless mesh networking, or proprietary equipment designed to operate over open 900 MHz, 2.4 GHz, 4.9, 5, 24, and 60 GHz bands or licensed frequencies in the UHF band, LMDS, and other bands from 6 GHz to 80 GHz.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Net neutrality</span> Principle that Internet service providers should treat all data equally

Network neutrality, often referred to as net neutrality, is the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) must treat all Internet communications equally, offering users and online content providers consistent rates irrespective of content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, source address, destination address, or method of communication.

Access Communications Co-operative Limited is a Canadian telecom cooperative based in Regina, Saskatchewan. The cooperative provides internet, cable television, telephone, smart home and security services to residential and business customers in 235 Saskatchewan communities. Its primary competitor is the provincial government crown corporation SaskTel.

Municipal broadband is broadband Internet access offered by public entities. Services are often provided either fully or partially by local governments to residents within certain areas or jurisdictions. Common connection technologies include unlicensed wireless, licensed wireless, and fiber-optic cable. Many cities that previously deployed Wi-Fi based solutions, like Comcast and Charter Spectrum, are switching to municipal broadband. Municipal fiber-to-the-home networks are becoming more prominent because of increased demand for modern audio and video applications, which are increasing bandwidth requirements by 40% per year. The purpose of municipal broadband is to provide internet access to those who cannot afford internet from internet service providers and local governments are increasingly investing in said services for their communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frontier Communications</span> American telecommunications company

Frontier Communications Parent, Inc. is an American telecommunications company. Known as Citizens Utilities Company until 2000, Citizens Communications Company until 2008, and Frontier Communications Corporation until 2020, as a communications provider with a fiber-optic network and cloud-based services, Frontier offers broadband internet, digital television, and computer technical support to residential and business customers in 25 states. In some areas it also offers home phone services.

The Universal Service Fund (USF) is a system of telecommunications subsidies and fees managed by the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) intended to promote universal access to telecommunications services in the United States. The FCC established the fund in 1997 in compliance with the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The FCC is a government agency that implements and enforces telecommunications regulations across the U.S. and its territories. The Universal Service Fund's budget ranges from $5–8 billion per year depending on the needs of the telecommunications providers. These needs include the cost to maintain the hardware needed for their services and the services themselves. The total 2019 proposed budget for the USF was $8.4 billion. The budget is revised quarterly allowing the service providers to accurately estimate their costs. As of 2019, roughly 60% of the USF budget was put towards “high-cost” areas, 19% went to libraries and schools, 13% was for low income areas, and 8% was for rural health care. In 2019 the rate for the USF budget was 24.4% of a telecom company's interstate and international end-user revenues.

Internet in Australia first became available on a permanent basis to universities in Australia in May 1989, via AARNet. Pegasus Networks was Australia's first public Internet provider in June 1989. The first commercial dial-up Internet Service Provider (ISP) appeared in capital cities soon after, and by the mid-1990s almost the entire country had a range of choices of dial-up ISPs. Today, Internet access is available through a range of technologies, i.e. hybrid fibre coaxial cable, digital subscriber line (DSL), Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) and satellite Internet. In July 2009, the federal government, in partnership with the industrial sector, began rolling out a nationwide fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) and improved fixed wireless and satellite access through the National Broadband Network. Subsequently, the roll out was downgraded to a Multi-Technology Mix on the promise of it being less expensive and with earlier completion. In October 2020, the federal government announced an upgrade by 2023 of NBN fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) services to FTTP for 2 million households, at a cost of A$3.5 billion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet in the United States</span> Overview of the Internet in the United States of America

The Internet in the United States grew out of the ARPANET, a network sponsored by the Advanced Research Projects Agency of the U.S. Department of Defense during the 1960s. The Internet in the United States in turn provided the foundation for the worldwide Internet of today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grande Communications</span> Telecommunications firm based in Texas

Grande Communications Networks, LLC is an American telecommunications company, based in San Marcos, Texas, that uses a fiber optic and cable network to offer broadband services. The company was established in 1999 when it was the recipient of the largest round of venture capital funding in Texas. Grande delivers internet access, local and long-distance telephone service and digital cable over its own network to nine different markets in Texas. Grande Communications serves as the primary provider of cable services for dormitories on the campuses of Texas State University, University of the Incarnate Word, Baylor University and the University of Texas at Austin. It is controlled by private equity firm TPG Capital through its affiliate Patriot Media Consulting. Grande Communications is available to an estimated 1.1 million people, making it the 16th largest provider of cable broadband in the U.S. by coverage area.

Connecting America: The National Broadband Plan is a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) plan to improve Internet access in the United States. The FCC was directed to create the plan by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, and unveiled its plan on March 16, 2010.

Broadband universal service, also known as "universal service obligation" (USO) or "universal broadband service", refers to government efforts to ensure all citizens have access to the internet. Universal voice service obligations have been expanded to include broadband service obligations in Switzerland, Finland, Spain and the UK.

The digital divide in the United States refers to inequalities between individuals, households, and other groups of different demographic and socioeconomic levels in access to information and communication technologies ("ICTs") and in the knowledge and skills needed to effectively use the information gained from connecting.

NTCA - The Rural Broadband Association (NTCA) is a membership association with the goal of improving communications services in rural America. With a membership comprising over 850 independent rural American telecommunications companies in 46 states, NTCA provides training and employee benefit packages to its members. It also advocates rural issues to legislatures, including universal service, rural infrastructure, cybersecurity, telemedicine, and consumer protection.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.