Selenomonad

Last updated

Selenomonad
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Bacillota
Class: Negativicutes
Order: Selenomonadales
Family: Selenomonadaceae
Genus: Selenomonas
von Prowazek 1913 [1]
Type species
Selenomonas sputigena
(Flügge 1886) Boskamp 1922
Species [2]

See text

Members of the genus Selenomonas (motile crescent-shaped bacteria in general) are referred to trivially as selenomonads. The genus Selenomonas constitutes a group of motile crescent-shaped bacteria and includes species living in the gastrointestinal tracts of animals, in particular the ruminants. A number of smaller forms discovered with the light microscope are now in culture but many, especially the large selenomonads are not, owing to their fastidious and incompletely known growth requirements.

Contents

Gram stain

The family Veillonellaceae was transferred from the order Eubacteriales to the new order Selenomonadales in the new class Negativicutes . [3] Despite most of the members of the Bacillota staining positive for the Gram stain and being trivially called "low-GC Gram-positives" (c.f. Bacterial phyla), members of the Negativicutes stain Gram-negative and possess a double bilayer. [3]

This transfer now appears to have been mistaken. [4] On further examination the Selenomonads appear to be members of the Clostridia.

Etymology

The etymology of the name Selenomonas comes from the Ancient Greek noun selênê (σελήνη), meaning the moon, a linking -o- and the noun monas (μόνας) which in microbiology has come to mean bacterium. [2] The name Selenomonas simply refers to the crescent moon-shaped profile of this organism and not in any way to the chemical element selenium. The unique cell morphology of certain large selenomonads (with its in-folding of the cell membrane behind the flagella) would indicate bilateral symmetry along the long axis—an unusual property for prokaryotes.

History and description

The literature on Selenomonas has roots dating back to the 19th century—and beyond—since the features and movements of living (then unclassified) crescent-shaped microorganisms from the human mouth were first described by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek in 1683. [5] During more recent years the crescent-shaped organism observed in ruminant stomachs has been variously described as:

As can be ascertained from the above nomenclature, the genus Selenomonas provides a fascinating history of scientific discovery, involving placement then re-placement in the classification systematics, oscillating between animal and bacterial kingdoms. In early descriptions it was thought to be a protozoan and hence for a while received the name Selenomastix.

The most morphologically interesting members of the selenomonads are undoubtedly the large motile crescents found in the warm anaerobic nutrient-rich microecosystem provided by ruminant rumen, guinea-pig caecum (S. palpitans) and even pockets in the human gingiva (S. sputigena). In the illustrated atlas of sheep rumen organisms of Moir and Masson their organisms nos. 4 and 5 represent two forms of the large Selenomonads. [10] These crescents live only a short time under the light microscope but during that time display a remarkable "tumbling" motion produced by one (or two—during cell division) flagella emanating from a refractile basal body on the concave side, which was first described by Woodcock & LaPage, studied later by Lessel & Breed (with photomicrographic addendum from C. F. Robinow), [11] then by Jeynes, who (mistakenly) interpreted it as a "blepharoplast". [12] [13]

Large forms of Selenomonas from enriched sheep rumen liquor after aldehyde fixation. Phase contrast 100x oil imm., electronic flash. Shows coiled-up flagella and dark linear region along concave side at flagella attachment region. Seleno LM.jpg
Large forms of Selenomonas from enriched sheep rumen liquor after aldehyde fixation. Phase contrast 100x oil imm., electronic flash. Shows coiled-up flagella and dark linear region along concave side at flagella attachment region.

Years later, preparations of native rumen contents were examined for the first time by transmission electron microscopy of thin sections, negative stains and freeze-fracture replicas. [14] [15] and many of the reasons for previous confusion were clarified. The "flagellum" was found to be quite unrelated to the flagellum of ciliate protozoa, instead consisting of a "fascicle" of numerous bacterial-type flagella (each displaying 11-fold subunit symmetry), twisted just outside the cell body into helical bundles to form strong organs of propulsion. The large crescents (which are better described as "bean-shaped") have flagella which are quite differently inserted into the concave side of the cell from those of the smaller species of Selenomonas. The small selenomonads have a rather low number of individual flagella inserted in a longitudinal row along the concave side whereas the large selenomonads have a much larger number, inserted into a circular patch of the cell membrane in the concave side in a close-packed (hexagonal) pattern, each flagellum inserted into a bullet-shaped structure at the cell membrane. Another interesting feature is the refractile body located beneath the massive flagella bundle characterizing the large crescents. It is not related morphologically to the ciliate blepharoplast (a "9+2" centriole-related structure found in cryptogams such as cycads, Ginkgo biloba and algae e.g. Euglena and Chlamydomonas). This flagella-associated structure observed in the large selenomonad can perhaps best be described as a "basal sac" formed by an invagination (in-folding) of the "polar organelle" region of the bacterial cell membrane in the middle of the concave side of the organism so that it lies directly behind the flagella. It appears to be unique in prokaryotes so far examined since in other bacteria possessing polar organelles, the structure is situated beside and around the flagella insertion bases in the cell membrane, but never lying behind them in the cytoplasm as in the case of the large selenomonad. The large crescents, with their unique morphology, still present many puzzles in their systematics. It is already clear from ultrastructural features that the genus Selenomonas is most probably an artificial classification, bringing together possibly unrelated organisms, simply because of their common possession of crescent morphology and peculiar flagellar insertion location. Successful attempts to maintain the large crescents in continuous culture over short terms have been reported by Prins [16] but long term culturing has not been possible so far. Genetic sequencing of the large crescents should provide the essential information required to better understand and classify these organisms.

Sketch of a sagittal longitudinal ultrathin section through an unidentified large selenomonad from sheep rumen liquor (which seems to correspond closely to descriptions of S. palpitans). Selenomonad sls.png
Sketch of a sagittal longitudinal ultrathin section through an unidentified large selenomonad from sheep rumen liquor (which seems to correspond closely to descriptions of S. palpitans).

With regard to the small selenomonads, research on obesity suggests that S. noxia may be an indicator of change in oral microbial ecology and might be directly or indirectly involved in obesity. [17]

Phylogeny

The currently accepted taxonomy is based on the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) [2] and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [18]

16S rRNA based LTP_08_2023 [19] [20] [21] 120 single copy marker proteins based GTDB 08-RS214 [22] [23] [24]

Selenomonas lacticifex Schleifer et al. 1990

Selenomonas

Selenomonas capraePoothong et al. 2023

"Selenomonas lactilytica" (Bryant 1956) Hungate 1966

Selenomonas ruminantium (Certes 1899) Wenyon 1926

speciesgroup 3

Mitsuokella

Selenomonas

Selenomonas montiformisWylensek et al. 2021

Selenomonas bovisZhang and Dong 2009

Selenomonas lipolyticaDighe et al. 1998

speciesgroup 2

Schwartzia

Anaerovibrio

Selenomonas sputigena (Flügge 1886) Boskamp 1922 (Type sp.)

Centipeda periodontii

Selenomonas

Selenomonas timonaeAntezack et al. 2021

Selenomonas noxia Moore et al. 1987

Selenomonas artemidisMoore et al. 1987

Selenomonas infelixMoore et al. 1987

Selenomonas dianaeMoore et al. 1987

Selenomonas flueggeiMoore et al. 1987

speciesgroup 4

Selenomonas sputigena (Flügge 1886) Boskamp 1922

Anaerovibrio

Schwartzia Gylswyk et al. 1997

Quinella Krumholz et al. 1993

Centipeda

Selenomonas artemidis

"Selenomonas felix"

Selenomonas flueggei

Selenomonas noxia

"Selenomonas massiliensis"

Selenomonas infelix

Centipeda periodontii

Selenomonas timonae

Selenomonas bovis

Mitsuokella

Selenomastix

Selenomonas montiformis

"Selenomonas lactilytica"

S. ruminantium (Certes 1899) Woodcock & Lapage 1913-1914

Unassigned species:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pseudomonadota</span> Phylum of Gram-negative bacteria

Pseudomonadota is a major phylum of Gram-negative bacteria. The renaming of several prokaryote phyla in 2021, including Pseudomonadota, remains controversial among microbiologists, many of whom continue to use the earlier name Proteobacteria, of long standing in the literature. The phylum Proteobacteria includes a wide variety of pathogenic genera, such as Escherichia, Salmonella, Vibrio, Yersinia, Legionella, and many others. Others are free-living (non-parasitic) and include many of the bacteria responsible for nitrogen fixation.

<i>Bdellovibrio</i> Genus of bacteria

Bdellovibrio is a genus of Gram-negative, obligate aerobic bacteria. One of the more notable characteristics of this genus is that members can prey upon other Gram-negative bacteria and feed on the biopolymers, e.g. proteins and nucleic acids, of their hosts. They have two lifestyles: a host-dependent, highly mobile phase, the "attack phase", in which they form "bdelloplasts" in their host bacteria; and a slow-growing, irregularly shaped, host-independent form.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flagellum</span> Cellular appendage functioning as locomotive or sensory organelle

A flagellum is a hairlike appendage that protrudes from certain plant and animal sperm cells, and from a wide range of microorganisms to provide motility. Many protists with flagella are known as flagellates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spirochaete</span> Phylum of bacteria

A spirochaete or spirochete is a member of the phylum Spirochaetota, which contains distinctive diderm (double-membrane) gram-negative bacteria, most of which have long, helically coiled cells. Spirochaetes are chemoheterotrophic in nature, with lengths between 3 and 500 μm and diameters around 0.09 to at least 3 μm.

<i>Proteus mirabilis</i> Species of bacterium

Proteus mirabilis is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped bacterium. It shows swarming motility and urease activity. P. mirabilis causes 90% of all Proteus infections in humans. It is widely distributed in soil and water. Proteus mirabilis can migrate across the surface of solid media or devices using a type of cooperative group motility called swarming. Proteus mirabilis is most frequently associated with infections of the urinary tract, especially in complicated or catheter-associated urinary tract infections.

<i>Leptospira</i> Genus of bacteria

Leptospira is a genus of spirochaete bacteria, including a small number of pathogenic and saprophytic species. Leptospira was first observed in 1907 in kidney tissue slices of a leptospirosis victim who was described as having died of "yellow fever".

Fibrobacterota is a small bacterial phylum which includes many of the major rumen bacteria, allowing for the degradation of plant-based cellulose in ruminant animals. Members of this phylum were categorized in other phyla. The genus Fibrobacter was removed from the genus Bacteroides in 1988.

The bacterium, despite its simplicity, contains a well-developed cell structure which is responsible for some of its unique biological structures and pathogenicity. Many structural features are unique to bacteria and are not found among archaea or eukaryotes. Because of the simplicity of bacteria relative to larger organisms and the ease with which they can be manipulated experimentally, the cell structure of bacteria has been well studied, revealing many biochemical principles that have been subsequently applied to other organisms.

Thermoproteus is a genus of archaeans in the family Thermoproteaceae. These prokaryotes are thermophilic sulphur-dependent organisms related to the genera Sulfolobus, Pyrodictium and Desulfurococcus. They are hydrogen-sulphur autotrophs and can grow at temperatures of up to 95 °C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bacteria</span> Domain of microorganisms

Bacteria are ubiquitous, mostly free-living organisms often consisting of one biological cell. They constitute a large domain of prokaryotic microorganisms. Typically a few micrometres in length, bacteria were among the first life forms to appear on Earth, and are present in most of its habitats. Bacteria inhabit soil, water, acidic hot springs, radioactive waste, and the deep biosphere of Earth's crust. Bacteria play a vital role in many stages of the nutrient cycle by recycling nutrients and the fixation of nitrogen from the atmosphere. The nutrient cycle includes the decomposition of dead bodies; bacteria are responsible for the putrefaction stage in this process. In the biological communities surrounding hydrothermal vents and cold seeps, extremophile bacteria provide the nutrients needed to sustain life by converting dissolved compounds, such as hydrogen sulphide and methane, to energy. Bacteria also live in symbiotic and parasitic relationships with plants and animals. Most bacteria have not been characterised and there are many species that cannot be grown in the laboratory. The study of bacteria is known as bacteriology, a branch of microbiology.

The Veillonellaceae are a family of the Clostridia, formerly known as Acidaminococcaceae. Bacteria in this family are grouped together mainly based on genetic studies, which place them among the Bacillota. Supporting this placement, several species are capable of forming endospores. However, they differ from most other Bacillota in having Gram-negative stains. The cell wall composition is peculiar.

Motility protein A, MotA, is a bacterial protein that is encoded by the motA gene. It is a component of the flagellar motor. More specifically, MotA and MotB make the stator of a H+ driven bacterial flagella and surround the rotor as a ring of about 8–10 particles. MotA and MotB are integral membrane proteins. MotA has four transmembrane domains.

The Negativicutes are a class of bacteria in the phylum Bacillota, whose members have a peculiar cell wall with a lipopolysaccharide outer membrane which stains gram-negative, unlike most other members of the Bacillota. Although several neighbouring Clostridia species also stain gram-negative, the proteins responsible for the unusual diderm structure of the Negativicutes may have actually been laterally acquired from Pseudomonadota. Additional research is required to confirm the origin of the diderm cell envelope in the Negativicutes.

Lautropia mirabilis is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, oxidase- and catalase-positive, motile bacterium of the genus Lautropia and family Burkholderiaceae, isolated from the mouth of children who were infected with human immunodeficiency virus.

Bacteriovorax is a genus containing a single species of bacterium in the family Bacteriovoracaceae, Bacteriovorax stolpii. It is a predator that feeds on larger Gram-negative bacteria. These prey bacteria tend to live in enteric environments and have similar lipopolysaccharide structures. Bacteriovorax stolpii recognizes its prey by outer membrane protein receptors, which explains why Gram-positive bacteria that lack outer membranes do not serve as prey. They prey on bacteria by invading the interperiplasmic space where they feed, grow, and reproduce. Bacteriovorax stolpii used to be classified in the genus Bdellovibrio because of similar morphologies and lifestyle characteristics, however they were recognized as a new genus through phylogenetic analysis.

Aquaspirillum serpens is a species of gram-negative bacteria in the family Neisseriaceae.

Methanogens are a group of microorganisms that produce methane as a byproduct of their metabolism. They play an important role in the digestive system of ruminants. The digestive tract of ruminants contains four major parts: rumen, reticulum, omasum and abomasum. The food with saliva first passes to the rumen for breaking into smaller particles and then moves to the reticulum, where the food is broken into further smaller particles. Any indigestible particles are sent back to the rumen for rechewing. The majority of anaerobic microbes assisting the cellulose breakdown occupy the rumen and initiate the fermentation process. The animal absorbs the fatty acids, vitamins and nutrient content on passing the partially digested food from the rumen to the omasum. This decreases the pH level and initiates the release of enzymes for further breakdown of the food which later passes to the abomasum to absorb remaining nutrients before excretion. This process takes about 9–12 hours.

Selenomonas ruminantium is a species of Selenomonas bacteria which are closely associated with ruminants, aiding in digestion of their food. It is predominantly observed in the rumen of these animals, and is strictly anaerobic.

Cytophagales is an order of non-spore forming, rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacteria that move through a gliding or flexing motion. These chemoorganotrophs are important remineralizers of organic materials into micronutrients. They are widely dispersed in the environment, found in ecosystems including soil, freshwater, seawater and sea ice. Cytophagales is included in the Bacteroidota phylum.

Selenomonas sputigena is a species of anaerobe Gram-negative bacteria that is found in the upper respiratory tract of humans. It is the type species of the genus Selenomonas, with the type strain VPI D 19B-28. It is known to cause blood infection (sepsis), gum inflammation, and tooth decay. It alone cannot damage the tooth enamel, but worsen the damage done by other bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans,Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia.

References

  1. Von Prowazek, S. (1913). "Zur Parasitologie von Westafrika" [Parasitology of West Africa]. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene, Abteilung I. 7 (1/2): 32–36.
  2. 1 2 3 J.P. Euzéby. "Selenomonas". List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN). Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  3. 1 2 Marchandin, H.; Teyssier, C.; Campos, J.; Jean-Pierre, H.; Roger, F.; Gay, B.; Carlier, J. -P.; Jumas-Bilak, E. (2009). "Negativicoccus succinicivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human clinical samples, emended description of the family Veillonellaceae and description of Negativicutes classis nov., Selenomonadales ord. nov. and Acidaminococcaceae fam. nov. in the bacterial phylum Firmicutes". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 60 (6): 1271–1279. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.013102-0 . PMID   19667386.
  4. Yutin N, Galperin MY (2013). "A genomic update on Clostridial phylogeny: Gram-negative spore formers and other misplaced Clostridia". Environ Microbiol. 15: 2631–41. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12173. PMC   4056668 . PMID   23834245.
  5. Dobell, C. (1932). Antony van Leeuwenhoek and his "little animals". New York, Harcourt, Brace and company.
  6. Certes, A. (1889). "Note sur les micro-organismes de la panse des ruminants". Bull. Soc. Zool. France. 14: 70–73.
  7. Woodcock, H. M. & G. Lapage (1914). "On a remarkable type of protistan parasite". Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science. 59: 431–458.
  8. MacDonald, J. B. Madlener, E. M. & Socransky, S. S. (1959). "Observations on Spirillum sputigenum and its relationship to Selenomonas species with special reference to flagellation". J. Bacteriol. 77 (5): 559–565. doi:10.1128/JB.77.5.559-565.1959. PMC   290421 . PMID   13654218.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. Wenyon, C.M. (1926). Protozoology, Vol. 1.
  10. Moir, R.J. & Masson, M.J. (1952). "An illustrated scheme for the microscopic identification of the rumen micro-organisms of sheep". J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 64 (2): 343–350. doi:10.1002/path.1700640210. PMID   14946656.
  11. Lessel, E.F. Jr. & Breed, R.S. (1954). "Selenomonas Boskamp, 1922. A genus that includes species showing an unusual type of flagellation". Bacteriol. Rev. 18 (3): 165–169. doi:10.1128/MMBR.18.3.165-169.1954. PMC   180798 . PMID   13189856.
  12. Jeynes, M.H. (1955). "Taxonomic position of the Genus Selenomonas (von Prowazek". Nature. 176 (December): 1077. Bibcode:1955Natur.176.1077J. doi: 10.1038/1761077a0 . S2CID   4165067.
  13. Jeynes, M.H. (1956). "Analysis of the Genus Selenomonas with respect to its transfer to the Protozoa". International Bulletin of Bacteriological Nomenclature and Taxonomy. 6 (2): 53–59. doi: 10.1099/0096266X-6-2-53 .
  14. Chalcroft J.P; Bullivant S & Howard B.H. (1973). "Ultrastructural studies on Selenomonas ruminantium from the sheep rumen". Journal of General Microbiology. 79 (1): 135–146. doi: 10.1099/00221287-79-1-135 . PMID   4773919.
  15. Kingsley V V & Hoeniger J F M (1 December 1973). "Growth, structure, and classification of Selenomonas". Bacteriological Reviews. 37 (4): 479–521. doi:10.1128/MMBR.37.4.479-521.1973. PMC   413832 . PMID   4129090.
  16. Prins, R.A. (1971). "Isolation, Culture and Fermentation Characteristics of Selenomonas ruminantium var. bryanti var. n. from the Rumen of Sheep". J. Bacteriol. 105 (3): 820–825. doi:10.1128/JB.105.3.820-825.1971. PMC   248505 . PMID   4323298.
  17. J.M. Goodson, D. Groppo, S. Halem1, and E. Carpino (2009). "Is Obesity an Oral Bacterial Disease?". Journal of Dental Research. 88 (6): 519–523. doi:10.1177/0022034509338353. PMC   2744897 . PMID   19587155. NIHMSID NIHMS131569.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  18. Sayers; et al. "Selenomonas". National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) taxonomy database. Retrieved 9 September 2022.
  19. "The LTP" . Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  20. "LTP_all tree in newick format" . Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  21. "LTP_08_2023 Release Notes" (PDF). Retrieved 20 November 2023.
  22. "GTDB release 08-RS214". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  23. "bac120_r214.sp_label". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.
  24. "Taxon History". Genome Taxonomy Database . Retrieved 10 May 2023.