Self-Efficacy (book)

Last updated
Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control
Bandura-Self-Efficacy-400pix.jpg
Author Albert Bandura
LanguageEnglish; trans. to Chinese, French, Italian, and Korean
Genre Psychology
Publisher W. H. Freeman;
Publication date
1997
Pages604
ISBN 978-0-7167-2850-4
OCLC 36074515

Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control is a psychology book written by Albert Bandura in 1997 on self-efficacy, i.e. a person's belief in their own competence. The book addresses issues ranging from theoretical discussions to developmental analyses. Translations have been published in Chinese, French, Italian, and Korean. [1]

Contents

The book has been reviewed and discussed in several professional social science journals, [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] and widely cited in the professional literatures of psychology, sociology, medicine, and management.

Topics covered

Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control contains 11 chapters.

The first five chapters provide conceptual background and review overall empirical support for the importance of self-efficacy, and how it interacts with other psychological phenomena:
1.Theoretical Perspectives
(pp. 1–35)
Presents the book's view of nature of human agency. "Thought processes are not only emergent brain activities, they also exert determinative influence," [8] :4 and "reflecting on one's own functioning entails shifting the perspective of the same agent.... One is just as much an agent when one is reflecting on one's experiences and exerting self-influence as when one is executing courses of action." [8] :5 Bandura argues that "It is the height of irony when people who exercise the liberties guaranteed by institutions of freedom denigrate freedom as an illusion," and that "A fervent environmental determinist urging people to change their environment is amusingly self-negating." [8] :9 The chapter also presents Bandura's view of human agency as operating in the context of three-way mutual influence between internal personal factors, behavior, and the external environment, a view called "triadic reciprocal causation" [8] :5 The chapter also distinguishes self-efficacy from related constructs such as self-concept, self-esteem, effectance motivation, outcome expectancies, and self-guidance by envisioned possible selves. and other control beliefs such as locus of control.
2.The Nature and Structure of Self-Efficacy
(pp. 36–78)
Describes perceived self-efficacy perceptions as "a key factor in a generative system of human competence." [8] :37 These perceptions are "concerned not with the number of skills you have, but with what you believe you can do with what you have under a variety of circumstances." [8] :37 In the "standard methodology" for measuring efficacy beliefs, "individuals are presented with items portraying different levels of task demands, and they rate the strength of their belief in their ability to execute the requisite activities. The items are phrased in terms of can do rather than will do." [8] :43 Self-efficacy is domain-specific and multidimensional, and beliefs vary according to strength and robustness in the face of perturbing events, level of task challenge, and generality across wide ranges of activities.
3.Sources of Self-Efficacy
(pp. 79–115)
Four main sources of self-efficacy are described, including enactive mastery experience, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, physiological and affective states.
4.Mediating Processes
(pp. 116–161)
Four separate subsections describe theory and evidence for how cognitive, motivational, affective, and selection processes may mediate influences on outcomes of interest from self-efficacy perceptions, or "the processes through which efficacy beliefs produce their effects." [8] :116 These processes are viewed as usually operating "in concert, rather than in isolation, in the ongoing regulation of human functioning." [8] :116
5.Developmental Analysis of Self-Efficacy
(pp. 162–211)
The books fifth chapter describes developmental origins of a sense of personal agency and the associated self-efficacy perceptions. These include familial sources of self-efficacy, schools, peer influences and other sources of broadened validation, and the influence of transitional experiences of adolescence. It also describes concerns about self-efficacy in adulthood, and how self-efficacy perceptions may be reappraised with advancing age.
The final six chapters focus on the relevance of self-efficacy to several specific areas of human functioning:
6.Cognitive Functioning.
7.Health Functioning.
8.Clinical Functioning.
9.Athletic Functioning.
10.Organizational Functioning.
11.Collective Efficacy.

It also contains a preface, author and subject indices, and a 48-page reference section. The preface explained that

Much contemporary theorizing depicts people as onlooking hosts of internal mechanisms orchestrated by environmental events. They are stripped of any sense of agency. People are proactive, aspiring organisms who have a hand in shaping their own lives and the social systems.... This book explores the exercise of human agency through people's beliefs in their capabilities... It reviews in considerable detail the origins of efficacy beliefs, their structure, the processes through which they affect human well-being and accomplishments, and how these processes can be developed and enlisted for human betterment. (p. vii)

Reception

Reviews have appeared in Contemporary Psychology , [2] the Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, [3] Personnel Psychology , [4] the British Journal of Clinical Psychology , [5] the Educational Administration Quarterly , [6] and the International Journal of Selection and Assessment. [7]

In Contemporary Psychology , James E. Maddux wrote that "Bandura's aim is to 'document the many ways in which efficacy beliefs operate in concert with other socio-cognitive determinants in governing human adaptation and change' (p. vii). He succeeds totally. While covering a remarkable number and array of topics, the book moves logically from the general to the specific.... Although the book is scholarly in purpose and tone throughout, it is liberally sprinkled with humor and, more important, wisdom.... [and] offers numerous suggestions for improving our personal lives and restructuring our social, political, and educational institutions and numerous insights into the nature of personal and social change" [2] :601–2 He also wrote that "the final chapter on collective efficacy.... is the most thought-provoking chapter in the book and deserves the widest possible readership. I hope Bandura will consider writing a volume based on this chapter for a general audience, for it offers ideas and insights that could become part of our general social and political discourse." [2] :602

In the Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy , Richard Lightsey wrote that one may "enter the term 'self-efficacy' in the on-line PSYCLIT database and you will find over 2500 articles, all of which stem from the seminal contributions of Albert Bandura.... Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control is the best attempt so far at organizing, summarizing, and distilling meaning from this vast and diverse literature," [3] :158 and that "Self-Efficacy is one of the most significant books of the last 50 years. It is essential reading for psychologists and will also be of immense value to teachers, school administrators, corporate managers, coaches, psychotherapists, vocational counselors, and indeed to anyone interested in enhancing motivation, self-management, and performance." [3] :165 Lightsey's 9-page review contained subsections on both strengths and weaknesses. Strengths included that

While incorporating prior works such as Social Learning Theory [9] ... and "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency" [10] ... Sef-Efficacy extends these works by describing results of diverse new research, clarifying and extending social cognitive theory, and fleshing out implications of the theory for groups, organizations, political bodies, and societies.... [and] masterfully contrasts social cognitive theory with many other theories of human behavior.... Throughout, Bandura's clear, firm, and self-confident writing serves as the perfect vehicle for the theory he espouses. [3] :158

With regard to limitations, Lightsey stated that Bandura's "usually deft prose sometimes bogs down in phrases such as 'subordinately acquiescent' (p. 29) and 'preeminently exalting' (p. 29)." [3] :165 and that there is "considerable redundancy both within and across chapters," with the latter "the inevitable result of organizing chapters by content area – much research is relevant to more than one chapter." [3] :165 Furthermore, "despite Bandura's cautions, it remains to be seen whether his very fruitful theory may be stretched to encompass psychological traits, subjective well-being, and other general but highly meaningful aspects of human life" that are "not referenced in the text." [3] :164

In Personnel Psychology , Edwin A. Locke wrote that "Bandura does everything that an inductive theory builder should do." [4] :802 Locke provided a list of 12 such accomplishments of the book – for example, "7. He discusses the causes of self-efficacy (e.g., enactive mastery, role modeling, persuasion, etc.) and shows, in detail, how these causes operate." [4] :802 Locke stated that "No self-respecting I/O psychologist or OB scholar should fail to read this book," [4] :803 adding that "I consider Albert Bandura's Social Cognitive Theory to be one of the greatest achievements in the history of psychology." [4] :801

In the British Journal of Clinical Psychology , Gillian Butler wrote that "There is hardly a single aspect of life, personal, social, cultural or political, that Albert Bandura does not attempt to consider in some depth – and for which he cannot cite a wealth of research relevant to his general model of self-efficacy.... Much that would otherwise have to be sought for at length has been brought together in one volume, with the consequence that this is one of the weightiest theoretical books on a subject of such wide general interest... to be published this decade." [5] :470 She also stated that "This is a most impressive, comprehensive, wide-ranging – and long – book.... This is not a book for beginners." [5] :470

In the Educational Administration Quarterly , Wayne K. Hoy wrote that "This book is a tour de force of scholarship; it is a book of theory grounded by research with clear practical implications." [6] :153 Hoy also cautioned that the reader should "make no mistake, this is a book for scholars and researchers; it is not light reading." [6] :153 He wrote that there "are many reasons" [6] :153 that administrators and students of educational administration would be interested in the book. Hoy listed 6 reasons before exploring them in detail (e.g., "a teacher's sense of self-efficacy is one of the few variables that is consistently related to student achievement"). Hoy concludes that "if the value of a theory is judged by the way it guides practice, then Bandura's theory of self-efficacy rates high. The work provides not only a wealth of insights but explicit guidelines on how to enable individuals to exercise control over their personal and professional lives.... Serious students of schools and administration should have a copy of this important work; in fact, I have two – one for home and one for school." [6] :157

In the International Journal of Selection and Assessment , Anneke Vrugt wrote that the book is "interesting and readable [and] will be of interest to students in psychology and management at intermediate to advanced level[s]." Vrugt stated that she could "recommend [the book] to everyone who is concerned with this subject in research and practice." [7] :132 She stated that the book would have benefited by giving "more attention" [7] :132–3 to topics of the measurement of self-efficacy, construct validity, and predictive validity. She also stated that "Bandura makes his theory too comprehensive, when he assumes self-efficacy beliefs to function as determinants of all other motivation-related variables." [7] :133

Editions

The original and only English-language edition was published in the US in 1997 by W. H. Freeman. Several foreign (non-English) editions have also been published. The English, Chinese, French, Italian, and Korean editions are:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Albert Bandura</span> Canadian-American psychologist (1925–2021)

Albert Bandura was a Canadian–American psychologist who was the David Starr Jordan Professor Emeritus of Social Science in Psychology at Stanford University.

Social learning is a theory of learning process social behavior which proposes that new behaviors can be acquired by observing and imitating others. It states that learning is a cognitive process that takes place in a social context and can occur purely through observation or direct instruction, even in the absence of motor reproduction or direct reinforcement. In addition to the observation of behavior, learning also occurs through the observation of rewards and punishments, a process known as vicarious reinforcement. When a particular behavior is rewarded regularly, it will most likely persist; conversely, if a particular behavior is constantly punished, it will most likely desist. The theory expands on traditional behavioral theories, in which behavior is governed solely by reinforcements, by placing emphasis on the important roles of various internal processes in the learning individual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Illusion of control</span> False belief in an ability to control events

The illusion of control is the tendency for people to overestimate their ability to control events. It was named by U.S. psychologist Ellen Langer and is thought to influence gambling behavior and belief in the paranormal. Along with illusory superiority and optimism bias, the illusion of control is one of the positive illusions.

Expectancy theory proposes that an individual will behave or act in a certain way because they are motivated to select a specific behavior over others due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior will be. In essence, the motivation of the behavior selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave.

Agency is the capacity of an actor to act in a given environment. It is independent of the moral dimension, which is called moral agency.

The psychology of learning refers to theories and research on how individuals learn. There are many theories of learning. Some take on a more behaviorist approach which focuses on inputs and reinforcements. Other approaches, such as theories related to neuroscience and social cognition, focus more on how the brain's organization and structure influence learning. Some psychological approaches, such as social constructivism, focus more on one's interaction with the environment and with others. Other theories, such as those related to motivation, like the growth mindset, focus more on individuals' perceptions of ability.

Goal setting involves the development of an action plan designed in order to motivate and guide a person or group toward a goal. Goals are more deliberate than desires and momentary intentions. Therefore, setting goals means that a person has committed thought, emotion, and behavior towards attaining the goal. In doing so, the goal setter has established a desired future state which differs from their current state thus creating a mismatch which in turn spurs future actions. Goal setting can be guided by goal-setting criteria such as SMART criteria. Goal setting is a major component of personal-development and management literature. Studies by Edwin A. Locke and his colleagues, most notably, Gary Latham have shown that more specific and ambitious goals lead to more performance improvement than easy or general goals. The goals should be specific, time constrained and difficult. Vague goals reduce limited attention resources. Unrealistically short time limits intensify the difficulty of the goal outside the intentional level and disproportionate time limits are not encouraging. Difficult goals should be set ideally at the 90th percentile of performance,assuming that motivation and not ability is limiting attainment of that level of performance. As long as the person accepts the goal, has the ability to attain it, and does not have conflicting goals, there is a positive linear relationship between goal difficulty and task performance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theory of planned behavior</span> Theory that links behavior

The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is a psychological theory that links beliefs to behavior. The theory maintains that three core components, namely, attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, together shape an individual's behavioral intentions. In turn, a tenet of TPB is that behavioral intention is the most proximal determinant of human social behavior.

In psychology, self-efficacy is an individual's belief in their capacity to act in the ways necessary to reach specific goals. The concept was originally proposed by the psychologist Albert Bandura.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confidence</span> State of trusting that a belief or course of action is correct

Confidence is the state of being clear-headed: either that a hypothesis or prediction is correct, or that a chosen course of action is the best or most effective. Confidence comes from the Latin word fidere which means "to trust". In contrast, arrogance or hubris is a state of unmerited confidence—belief lacking evidence and/or a reason. Overconfidence or presumptuousness is excessive belief in success without regard for potential failure. Confidence can be a self-fulfilling prophecy, as those without it may fail because they lack it, and those with it may succeed because they have it rather than because of an innate ability or skill.

Reciprocal determinism is the theory set forth by psychologist Albert Bandura which states that a person's behavior both influences and is influenced by personal factors and the social environment. Bandura accepts the possibility that an individual's behavior may be conditioned through the use of consequences. At the same time he asserts that a person's behavior can impact the environment.

Social cognitive theory (SCT), used in psychology, education, and communication, holds that portions of an individual's knowledge acquisition can be directly related to observing others within the context of social interactions, experiences, and outside media influences. This theory was advanced by Albert Bandura as an extension of his social learning theory. The theory states that when people observe a model performing a behavior and the consequences of that behavior, they remember the sequence of events and use this information to guide subsequent behaviors. Observing a model can also prompt the viewer to engage in behavior they already learned. In other words, people do not learn new behaviors solely by trying them and either succeeding or failing, but rather, the survival of humanity is dependent upon the replication of the actions of others. Depending on whether people are rewarded or punished for their behavior and the outcome of the behavior, the observer may choose to replicate behavior modeled. Media provides models for a vast array of people in many different environmental settings.

Behavioural change theories are attempts to explain why human behaviours change. These theories cite environmental, personal, and behavioural characteristics as the major factors in behavioural determination. In recent years, there has been increased interest in the application of these theories in the areas of health, education, criminology, energy and international development with the hope that understanding behavioural change will improve the services offered in these areas. Some scholars have recently introduced a distinction between models of behavior and theories of change. Whereas models of behavior are more diagnostic and geared towards understanding the psychological factors that explain or predict a specific behavior, theories of change are more process-oriented and generally aimed at changing a given behavior. Thus, from this perspective, understanding and changing behavior are two separate but complementary lines of scientific investigation.

Personal development or self-improvement consists of activities that develop a person's capabilities and potential, build human capital, facilitate employability, enhance quality of life, and facilitate the realization of dreams and aspirations. Personal development may take place over the course of an individual's entire lifespan and is not limited to one stage of a person's life. It can include official and informal actions for developing others in roles such as teacher, guide, counselor, manager, coach, or mentor, and it is not restricted to self-help. When personal development takes place in the context of institutions, it refers to the methods, programs, tools, techniques, and assessment systems offered to support positive adult development at the individual level in organizations.

Moral disengagement is a meaning from social psychology for the process of convincing the self that ethical standards do not apply to oneself in a particular context. This is done by separating moral reactions from inhumane conduct and disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation. Thus, moral disengagement involves a process of cognitive re-construing or re-framing of destructive behavior as being morally acceptable without changing the behavior or the moral standards.

Sport psychology was defined by the European Federation of Sport Psychology (FEPSAC) in 1996, as the study of the psychological basis, processes, and effects of sport. Otherwise, sport is considered as any physical activity where the individuals engage for competition and health. Sport psychology is recognized as an interdisciplinary science that draws on knowledge from many related fields including biomechanics, physiology, kinesiology and psychology. It involves the study of how psychological factors affect performance and how participation in sport and exercise affect psychological and physical factors. Sport psychologists teach cognitive and behavioral strategies to athletes in order to improve their experience and performance in sports.

<i>Social Foundations of Thought and Action</i>

Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory is a landmark work in psychology published in 1986 by Albert Bandura. The book expands Bandura's initial social learning theory into a comprehensive theory of human motivation and action, analyzing the role of cognitive, vicarious, self-regulatory, and self-reflective processes in psychosocial functioning. Bandura first advanced his thesis of reciprocal determinism in Social Foundations of Thought and Action.

Academic achievement or academic performance is the extent to which a student, teacher or institution has attained their short or long-term educational goals. Completion of educational benchmarks such as secondary school diplomas and bachelor's degrees represent academic achievement.

Alex Stajkovic is an Organizational Behavior (OB) professor who has conducted research on confidence and goal priming. He holds the Dean's Professorship in Business at the Wisconsin School of Business at the University of Wisconsin - Madison. His research bears on self-efficacy, confidence, and primed goals. Stajkovic co-authored papers with Albert Bandura, Edwin Locke, and Fred Luthans. Stajkovic is a contributing editor to the Journal of Applied Psychology, as well as a member of the Midwestern Psychological Association and Society for Science of Motivation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coaching psychology</span> Field of applied psychology

Coaching psychology is a field of applied psychology that applies psychological theories and concepts to the practice of coaching. Its aim is to increase performance, self-actualization, achievement and well-being in individuals, teams and organisations by utilising evidence-based methods grounded in scientific research. Coaching psychology is influenced by theories in various psychological fields, such as humanistic psychology, positive psychology, learning theory and social psychology.

References

  1. CV of Albert Bandura, accessed 30 May 2010.
  2. 1 2 3 4 James E. Maddux (1998). "Why the little blue engine could: Self-efficacy and the real power of positive thinking [review of self-efficacy: The exercise of control, by Albert Bandura]". PsycCRITIQUES: Contemporary Psychology. 43 (9): 601–602. doi:10.1037/001749. ISSN   1554-0138.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Richard Lightsey (1999). "Self-efficacy: The exercise of control". Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy . 13 (2): 158–166. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158. ISSN   0889-8391. S2CID   219219557.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Edwin A. Locke (1997). "Untitled [review of self-efficacy: The exercise of control, by Albert Bandura]". Personnel Psychology . 50 (3): 801–804. ISSN   0031-5826.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Gillian Butler (1998). "Untitled [review of Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, by Albert Bandura]". British Journal of Clinical Psychology . 37 (4): 470. ISSN   0144-6657.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wayne K. Hoy (1998). "Book review [Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, by Albert Bandura]". Educational Administration Quarterly . 34 (1): 153–158. doi:10.1177/0013161X98034001010. ISSN   0013-161X. S2CID   220401946. ISSN 1552-3519 (electronic)
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Anneke Vrugt (1998). "Self-efficacy: The exercise of control". International Journal of Selection and Assessment . 6 (2): 132–133. ISSN   0965-075X.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Bandura, Albert (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. ISBN   978-0-7167-2850-4. ISBN   0-7167-2850-8, OCLC   36074515
  9. Lightsey refers here to Bandura's book, Bandura, Albert (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. ISBN   978-0-13-816751-6. ISBN   0-13-816744-3
  10. Lightsey refers here to Bandura's paper, Bandura, Albert (1982). "Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency". American Psychologist . 37 (2): 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122. ISSN   0003-066X. S2CID   3377361.