That All Shall Be Saved

Last updated
That All Shall Be Saved: Heaven, Hell, and Universal Salvation
Cover of hat All Shall Be Saved book by David Bentley Hart.jpg
Book cover
Author David Bentley Hart
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject
Publisher Yale University Press
Publication date
September 24, 2019
Media typePrint (hardback)
Pages232
ISBN 978-0300246223

That All Shall Be Saved: Heaven, Hell, and Universal Salvation is a 2019 book by philosopher and religious studies scholar David Bentley Hart published by Yale University Press. In it Hart argues that "if Christianity taken as a whole is indeed an entirely coherent and credible system of belief, then the universalist understanding of its message is the only one possible." [1] Hart has described the book as a supplement to his The New Testament: A Translation published also by Yale in 2017. [2] The title is an allusion to the scriptural statement in 1 Timothy 2:4 that God "intends that all human beings shall be saved." [3] The book was published also as an audiobook narrated by Derek Perkins in 2019, [4] and a paperback edition containing a new preface was released in 2021. [5]

Contents

Content

The book consists of 232 pages and is structured in three main parts: "The Question of an Eternal Hell," "Apokatastasis: Four Meditations," and "What May Be Believed." The four meditations contained in the second part are titled as follows: "Who Is God?" "What Is Judgement?" "What Is a Person?" and "What Is Freedom?"

In the introduction, Hart states, "I know I cannot reasonably expect to persuade anyone of anything" as the thesis of the book is "at odds with a body of received opinion so invincibly well-established," [6] but he adds, "If nothing else, this book may provide champions of the dominant view an occasion for honest reflection and scrupulous cerebration and serious analysis." [7] Hart has summarized the book's six chief themes as follows:

The first theme is the possibility of intelligible analogical language about God in theological usage and the danger of what I have called a “contagion of equivocity.” [...] The second theme is the total disjunction of meaning that the idea of an eternal hell necessarily introduces into certain indispensable theological predicates and the destruction this necessarily wreaks on doctrinal coherence. [...] The third theme is the relation between the classical metaphysics of creatio ex nihilo and eschatology. [...] The fourth theme is that of the relation between time and eternity, or between history and the Kingdom, or between this age and the next in biblical eschatology, and whether any synthesis other than a universalist one (and especially one that, like Gregory of Nyssa’s, uses 1 Corinthians 15 as a master key) can hold all of the scriptural evidence together in a way that is not self-defeating. [...] The fifth theme is that of the ontological and moral structure of personhood, and the dependency of personal identity—again, both ontological and moral—on an indissoluble community of souls. [...] The final theme is that of the nature of rational freedom and of its relation to divine transcendence, and the implications this has for the “free will defense” of eternal perdition. [8]

Hart's arguments are primarily philosophical and theological in nature, yet he also invokes biblical and historical support for his view, citing 23 New Testament texts [9] (including the teaching of Paul in Romans 5:18-19 and of Jesus in John 12:32) which he regards as "straightforward doctrinal statements" of universal salvation, [10] and referencing the teaching of various notable early church fathers (including Gregory of Nyssa and Isaac of Nineveh) which he refers to as "the Christian universalists of the Greek and Syrian East." [11]

Reception

That All Shall Be Saved has been a polarizing book since its publication, receiving high commendation from some, and no shortage of criticism from others. John Behr described it as a "brilliant treatment—exegetically, theologically, and philosophically." [12] John Milbank stated that Hart "calls us back to real orthodoxy, perhaps just in time." [13] Andrew Louth characterized it as "a tightly argued case for universalism." [14] Tom Greggs called it "a genuinely beautiful and irenic book." [15] Other favorable reviewers have lauded it as "a passionate proclamation of the absolute love of God as revealed in Jesus Christ," [16] and "the work of a stirred and unyielding conscience," [17] whose argument is "forceful, analytically clear, and compelling." [18] Meanwhile, various critics, such as Edward Feser, have characterized the book as an "attack on Christian tradition" [19] full of "vituperative verbiage" [20] or even "heresy." [21] In the book itself, Hart predicted much of this: "I suspect that those who disagree with my position will either dismiss it or (if they are very boring indeed) try to refute it by reasserting the traditional majority position in any number of very predictable, very shopworn manners." [22] Subsequently, in various publications, Hart has responded in turn to a number of his critics (see table below). [23]

Critical ReviewResponse by HartExcerpt from Hart's Response
Shinji Akemi (9/16/19) Hart's Reply (9/20/19)"My thanks for Dr Shinji Akemi’s review of That All Shall Be Saved... The reviewer is correct that the metaphysics of creatio ex nihilo raises the question not only of the eternal dereliction of certain souls, but of every evil. But the two questions are radically different in modality. In fact, I deal with this issue on pp. 59-60 of the book."
Michael McClymond (10/2/19) Hart's Reply (6/12/20)"Two pieces by the American religious historian Michael McClymond were of much the same fabric—patently false claims about the book’s argument, illustrated with a few orphaned clauses from its pages, followed by two dozen fevered shrieks of frothing rage at all the things I had never actually said—though marked by even less philosophical sophistication."
Alan Gomes (10/2/19) Hart's Reply (3/20/23)"Gomes misread meditation one in a way that one or two other critics have—failing to note that there’s a kind of unique modal claim that goes with talking about God as omnipotent, omniscient, the creator of all things ex nihilo and how one judges that uniquely from the eschatological horizon... If Gomes wants to be true to his tradition, he should be as consistent as Calvin and simply recognize that his god is beyond good and evil altogether—which means he’s evil."
Peter Leithart (10/2/19) Hart's Reply (8/30/22)"Leithart had responded to my book That All Shall Be Saved in part by pointing out that the God of the Old Testament is not the morally impeccable 'Good Beyond Being' that the book presumes. In reply, I was explaining to him that I am not a fundamentalist, that the ancient church (like the Apostle Paul) read such texts allegorically for a reason, and that the alternative to allegory in the earliest church for any attentive reader would have been Marcionism."
Douglas Farrow (10/15/19) Hart's Reply (2/14/20)"The reason that Farrow and others cannot address the book’s real argument, but must instead indulge in flamboyant diversionary tactics and flights of frenzied polemic, is that they are incapable of answering it. Whether consciously or unconsciously, they know that it is an argument that they have already lost."
Benjamin Guyer (10/30/19) Hart's Reply (6/12/20)"Someone called Benjamin Guyer produced a review that, while spectacularly failing to follow so much as a single filament of the book’s case, heaped up a gaudy collection of fragments of the text, rearranged so as to give as false an impression as possible."
Barton Swaim (10/31/19) Hart's Reply (6/12/20)"Swaim did not even pretend to address any of the book’s arguments, but he expended enormous energy opportunistically pouncing on every seemingly damning turn of phrase that he could find in its pages, wrenching it violently out of its limited frame of reference, and then falsifying its import."
John Panteleimon Manoussakis (11/2/19) Hart's Reply (11/7/19)"I suppose I really must be grateful to Manoussakis for having at least attempted to write a serious review of the book. Given the passions that the topic of universal salvation tends to provoke, I have been obliged to endure more than a few petulant screeds scarcely bothering to disguise themselves as reviews, and so far have seen no critiques of any solvency. And so the effort to do better is greatly appreciated. That said, however, whatever Manoussakis may have intended to write, what in fact he has succeeded in producing is an engagement with arguments I have never made, while entirely failing to follow the ones I did."
Michael Pakaluk (2/6/20) Hart's Reply (2/14/20)"Pakaluk's review is at once the most violent and the most picayune of the assaults on my book to have appeared in the journal. It does, however, have the virtue of economy; it relies on a single gross misrepresentation... Pakaluk has ascribed to me assertions that as a matter of objective fact appear nowhere in my book, in order to create a counterfeit scandal that will distract readers from what the book really does say. And yet, one cannot help but notice that, even if Pakaluk had really had any case to make, it would have been one that, once stripped of the theatrically exorbitant rhetoric of fraud and satanic deception, would have concerned only a contestable exegetical point regarding a vanishingly minor matter of little consequence for the book’s argument."
William Matthew Diem (4/29/20) Hart's Reply (7/26/20)"To his credit, Diem’s is a genuine effort to offer a serious criticism of my work; his misunderstanding is not the result, as far as I can tell, of the indolence evident in Feser’s article. That said, I am not certain that Diem read the book either... His review falls into the familiar pattern: he is yet another critic who is arguing not with the case I (very precisely) make in the book, but with some other, more easily refuted case he has substituted for it."
Edward Feser (7/10/20) Hart's Reply (7/21/20)"Feser's misstatements are so bizarre and extravagant that there are only two possibilities: either he did not actually read the book, but at most skimmed bits of it in his rush to write a review he had already concocted in his mind; or he is, when reading a complex text that has not been carefully explained to him several times in advance, damned near a functional illiterate."
Benjamin DeVan (11/12/20) Hart's Reply (11/12/20)"My thanks to Benjamin B. DeVan for his review. I have to protest, however, that he has not laid out the continuous philosophical case that the book advances. I can only assume that past experience misled him into conflating my claims with others he had previously encountered, with the result that he missed the larger 'narrative arc,' so to speak. Thus he mischaracterizes the text as a whole, and attributes to me several claims in particular that I was careful not to make."
Mats Wahlberg (9/9/22) Hart's Reply (2/6/23)"A Dominican named Wahlberg wrote an earnest but still confused and somewhat embarrassingly revealing article about the book in a recent issue of Modern Theology. What was kind of shocking about it was not so much the poverty of his argument at the dialectical level—it was the moral poverty of it. He was willing to say that one should be unconcerned with the eternal sufferings of a certain number of rational souls if this allows for what good God does achieve in creation such as creating this person or that person. This is odd for a Thomist to argue because Thomism says that you cannot visit an injustice on non-existent persons; you're not hurting anyone by not creating."
James Dominic Rooney (10/18/22) Hart's Reply (1/10/23)"Another Dominican named Rooney has launched an online campaign against the book without, it seems, having mastered either any of its arguments or any of his own... His article conflated my case for universalism with an entirely unrelated metaphysical argument I had made elsewhere regarding the language of freedom and necessity in regard to divine transcendence, made a hash of both, advanced a very ill-conceived defense of a libertarian model of rational freedom (human and divine), and then degenerated into accusations of heresy (the inevitable refuge of bad theologians)."
Eleanore Stump (4/13/23) Hart's Reply (4/17/23)"Stump's article is merely a rehearsal of arguments that have been made many, many, many times before, all of which I believe I already addressed more than adequately in That All Shall Be Saved, and all of which have been refuted fairly thoroughly and fairly often by quite a few other authors. And Stump adds nothing new to any of them—the bland assumptions regarding the justice of eternal punishment, the empirically false claims regarding the range of human freedom... (and so forth)."

In an article regarding the various disputes surrounding the book and its thesis, Hart wrote the following:

One expects hostile reviews when one writes a book on a controversial topic; and this book in particular I knew would provoke and annoy. That was very much part of its purpose: to challenge Christian complacency with regard to the idea of a hell of eternal torment. But, in this case uniquely, a strange pattern has clearly emerged: to wit, none of its truly energetic critics in print has thus far condemned it for any claims actually contained in its pages. I do not mean that they have failed adequately to address its arguments. I mean that, to this point, none has even come close to identifying what those arguments are, let alone confuting them. Some reviews have demonstrated an almost perfect inability to grasp so much as a single thread of its reasoning, however elementary. [...] I am beginning to suspect that this particular topic has an almost magical power to provoke all sorts of ungovernable emotional volatilities in certain souls, of the sort that render them unable to absorb what they are reading. [...] Perhaps, then, the inability of certain critics to follow any of the book’s actual arguments is not just obtuseness (though a bit of that, surely), but instead reflects a temperamental incapacity on their parts for confronting any sustained assault on their own understanding of what they believe. And this, I think, is because (to adopt my language in the book) they do not really believe what they believe they believe. [24]

Related Research Articles

Pre-existence, preexistence, beforelife, or premortal existence, is the belief that each individual human soul existed before mortal conception, and at some point before birth enters or is placed into the body. Concepts of pre-existence can encompass either the belief that the soul came into existence at some time prior to conception or the belief that the soul is eternal. Alternative positions are traducianism and creationism, which both hold that the individual human soul does not come into existence until conception or later. It is to be distinguished from preformation, which is about physical existence and applies to all living things.

Universalism is the philosophical and theological concept that some ideas have universal application or applicability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Last Judgment</span> Eschatology of the Abrahamic religions and Zoroastrianism

The Last Judgment, Final Judgment, Day of Reckoning, Day of Judgment, Judgment Day, Doomsday, Day of Resurrection or The Day of the Lord is a concept found across the Abrahamic religions and the Frashokereti of Zoroastrianism.

The problem of Hell is an ethical problem in the Abrahamic religions of Christianity, Islam and Judaism, in which the existence of Hell (Jahannam) for the punishment of souls in the Afterlife is regarded as inconsistent with the notion of a just, moral, and omnipotent, omnibenevolent, omniscient supreme being. Also regarded as inconsistent with such a just being is the combination of human free will, and the divine qualities of omniscience and omnipotence, as this would mean God would determine everything that has happened and will happen in the universe—including sinful human behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of Christian universalism</span> Doctrine that all sinful and alienated human souls will ultimately be reconciled to God

In Christian theology, universal reconciliation is the doctrine that all sinful and alienated human souls—because of divine love and mercy—will ultimately be reconciled to God. The doctrine has been rejected by most mainstream Christian churches, which tend to maintain at least the possibility that many are not saved, but it has received support from many prestigious Christian thinkers as well as many groups of Christians. It has been argued that the Bible itself has a variety of verses that seem to support a plurality of views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unlimited atonement</span> Non-Calvinist Protestant doctrine

Unlimited atonement is a doctrine in Protestant Christianity that states Jesus died as a propitiation for the benefit of all humans without exception. It is normally associated with Amyraldism, as well as Arminianism and other non-Calvinist tradition. It is a doctrine distinct from other elements of the Calvinist acronym TULIP and is contrary to the Calvinist doctrine of limited atonement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Bentley Hart</span> American philosopher and theologian (b. 1965)

David Bentley Hart is an American writer, philosopher, religious studies scholar, critic, and theologian. Reviewers have commented on Hart's baroque prose and provocative rhetoric in over one thousand essays, reviews, and papers as well as nineteen books. From a predominantly Anglican family background, Hart became Eastern Orthodox when he was twenty-one. His academic works focus on Christian metaphysics, philosophy of mind, Indian and East Asian religion, Asian languages, classics, and literature as well as a New Testament translation. Books with wider audiences include The Doors of the Sea, Atheist Delusions, That All Shall Be Saved, and Roland in Moonlight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Five Ways (Aquinas)</span> Aquinas arguments that there is a real God

The Quinque viæ are five logical arguments for the existence of God summarized by the 13th-century Catholic philosopher and theologian Thomas Aquinas in his book Summa Theologica. They are:

  1. the argument from "first mover";
  2. the argument from universal causation;
  3. the argument from contingency;
  4. the argument from degree;
  5. the argument from final cause or ends.

The conditional preservation of the saints, or conditional perseverance of the saints, or commonly conditional security, is the Arminian Christian belief that believers are kept safe by God in their saving relationship with him upon the condition of a persevering faith in Christ. Arminians find the Scriptures describing both the initial act of faith in Christ, "whereby the relationship is effected", and the persevering faith in him "whereby the relationship is sustained." The relationship of "the believer to Christ is never a static relationship existing as the irrevocable consequence of a past decision, act, or experience." Rather, it is a living union "proceeding upon a living faith in a living Savior." This living union is captured in the simple command by Christ, "Remain in me, and I in you".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trinitarian universalism</span> Variant of belief in universal salvation

Trinitarian universalism is a variant of belief in universal salvation, the belief that every person will be saved, that also held the Christian belief in Trinitarianism. It was particularly associated with an ex-Methodist New England minister, John Murray, and after his death in 1815 the only clergy known to be preaching Trinitarian Universalism were Paul Dean of Boston and Edward Mitchell in New York.

The fate of the unlearned, also known as the destiny of the unevangelized, is an eschatological question about the ultimate destiny of people who have not been exposed to a particular theology or doctrine and thus have no opportunity to embrace it. The question is whether those who never hear of requirements issued through divine revelations will be punished for failure to abide by those requirements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hell in Christianity</span> Christian views on Hell

In Christian theology, Hell is the place or state into which, by God's definitive judgment, unrepentant sinners pass in the general judgment, or, as some Christians believe, immediately after death. Its character is inferred from teaching in the biblical texts, some of which, interpreted literally, have given rise to the popular idea of Hell. Theologians today generally see Hell as the logical consequence of rejecting union with God and with God's justice and mercy.

Eastern Orthodox theology is the theology particular to the Eastern Orthodox Church. It is characterized by monotheistic Trinitarianism, belief in the Incarnation of the divine Logos or only-begotten Son of God, cataphatic theology with apophatic theology, a hermeneutic defined by a Sacred Tradition, a catholic ecclesiology, a theology of the person, and a principally recapitulative and therapeutic soteriology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christian conditionalism</span> Concept in Christian theology

In Christian theology, conditionalism or conditional immortality is a concept in which the gift of immortality is attached to belief in Jesus Christ. This concept is based in part upon another biblical argument, that the human soul is naturally mortal, immortality is therefore granted by God as a gift. This viewpoint stands in contrast to the more popular concept of the "natural immortality" of the soul. Conditionalism is practically synonymous with annihilationism, the belief that the unsaved will be ultimately destroyed, rather than suffer unending physical torment, in hell.

Christian universalism is a school of Christian theology focused around the doctrine of universal reconciliation – the view that all human beings will ultimately be saved and restored to a right relationship with God. "Christian universalism" and "the belief or hope in the universal reconciliation through Christ" can be understood as synonyms. Opponents of this school, who hold that eternal damnation is the ultimate fate of some or most people, are sometimes called "infernalists."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lake of fire</span> Place of after-death punishment of the wicked in Christianity

The lake of fire is a concept that appears in both the ancient Egyptian and Christian religions. In ancient Egypt, it appears as an obstacle on the journey through the underworld which can destroy or refresh the deceased. In Christianity, it is as a place of after-death punishment of the wicked. The phrase is used in five verses of the Book of Revelation. In the biblical context, the concept seems analogous to the Jewish Gehenna, or the more common concept of Hell. The image of the lake of fire was taken up by the early Christian Hippolytus of Rome in about the year 230 and has continued to be used by modern Christians.

In Christianity, annihilationism is the belief that after the Last Judgment, all damned humans and fallen angels including Satan will be totally destroyed, cremated, and their consciousness extinguished rather than suffering forever in Hell. Annihilationism stands in contrast to both the belief in eternal torment and the belief that everyone will be saved ("universalism"). However, it is also possible to hold to a partial annihilationism, believing unsaved humans to be obliterated or cremated, but demonic beings to suffer forever.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elhanan Winchester</span> American theologian (1751–1797)

Elhanan Winchester was an American theologian who explored numerous theological paths before becoming an advocate for universal restoration. As a result, Winchester is considered among the early leaders of American Universalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eternal life (Christianity)</span> Concept of continued life after death

Eternal life traditionally refers to continued life after death, as outlined in Christian eschatology. The Apostles' Creed testifies: "I believe... the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting." In this view, eternal life commences after the second coming of Jesus and the resurrection of the dead, although in the New Testament's Johannine literature there are references to eternal life commencing in the earthly life of the believer, possibly indicating an inaugurated eschatology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Universalism and the Latter Day Saint movement</span> Universalism and the Latter Day Saint Movement

Christian universalism was a theology prevalent in the early United States coinciding with the founding of the Latter Day Saint movement in 1830. Universalists believed that God would save all of humanity. Universalism peaked in popularity during the 1820s and 1830s, and the idea of universal salvation for all humanity was hotly debated. Several revelations of the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement, Joseph Smith, dealt with issues regarding Universalism, and it was a prominent heresy in the Book of Mormon. Smith's father was a Universalist, while his mother was a traditional Calvinist, creating strain in the Smith family home.

References

  1. ↑ Hart, That All Shall Be Saved, 3.
  2. ↑ Hart, "The Edward Feser Algorithm: How to Review a Book You Have Not Read," via Eclectic Orthodoxy, July 2020.
  3. ↑ Paul (or Pseudo-Paul), First Epistle to Timothy, chapter 2, verse 4. The original Greek reads "πάντας ἀνθρώπους θέλει σωθῆναι."
  4. ↑ Tantor Audio, 2019.
  5. ↑ Hart, "Two Announcements," August 2021.
  6. ↑ Hart, That All Shall Be Saved, 5.
  7. ↑ Hart, That All Shall Be Saved, 5.
  8. ↑ Hart, "Universalism and Infernalism...," January, 2022.
  9. ↑ Romans 5:18-19, 1 Corinthians 15:22, 2 Corinthians 5:14, Romans 11:32, 1 Timothy 2:3-6, Titus 2:11, 2 Corinthians 5:19, Ephesians 1:9-10, Colossians 1:27-28, John 12:32, Hebrews 2:9, John 17:2, John 4:42, John 12:47, 1 John 4:14, 2 Peter 3:9, Matthew 18:14, Philippians 2:9-11, Colossians 1:19-20, 1 John 2:2, John 3:17, Luke 16:16, and 1 Timothy 4:10. (Cited in Hart's That All Shall Be Saved, 95-102)
  10. ↑ Hart, That All Shall Be Saved, 94.
  11. ↑ Hart, That All Shall Be Saved, 123.
  12. ↑ Behr, review/endorsement, via Amazon. "At last! A brilliant treatment--exegetically, theologically, and philosophically--of the promise that, in the end, all will indeed be saved, and exposing the inadequacy--above all moral--of claims to the contrary."
  13. ↑ Milbank, review/endorsement, via Amazon. "If everything and everyone are not finally restored, then God is not God. This is the simple core of Hart's unanswerable argument, masterfully developed. He calls us back to real orthodoxy, perhaps just in time."
  14. ↑ Louth, Andrew. Review of That All Shall Be Saved: Heaven, Hell, and Universal Salvation, by David Bentley Hart. Journal of Orthodox Christian Studies, vol. 3 no. 2, 2020, p. 232-235. Project MUSE, https://doi.org/10.1353/joc.2020.0022.
  15. ↑ Greggs, review/endorsement, Scottish Journal of Theology, via Amazon. "A genuinely beautiful and irenic book from one of the theological world's most able and creative thinkers."
  16. ↑ A.F. Kimel, "The Polemics of Perdition."
  17. ↑ Jason Micheli, "David Bentley Hart’s polemic against the alleged doctrine of eternal hell," Christian Century.
  18. ↑ Myles Werntz, In All Things.
  19. ↑ Edward Feser, "David Bentley Hart's Attack on Christian Tradition Fails to Convince."
  20. ↑ Michael McClymond, "David Bentley Hart’s Lonely, Last Stand for Christian Universalism."
  21. ↑ James Dominic Rooney, "The Incoherencies of Hard Universalism."
  22. ↑ Hart, That All Shall Be Saved, 4.
  23. ↑ See also Hart's "An Interim Report."
  24. ↑ Hart, "In Defense of A Certain Tone of Voice."
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.