Trialetian Mesolithic

Last updated
Trialetian culture
Period Mesolithic
Datesc. 16/13000 – c. 8000 BP
Major sites Trialeti, Shanidar Cave, Huto and Kamarband Caves, Kotias Klde, Chokh
Preceded by Baradostian culture
Followed by Shulaveri-Shomu culture

Trialetian is the name for an Upper Paleolithic-Epipaleolithic stone tool industry from the South Caucasus. [1] It is tentatively dated to the period between 16,000 / 13,000 BP and 8,000 BP. [2]

Contents

Archaeology

The name of the archaeological culture derives from sites in the district of Trialeti in south Georgian Khrami river basin. These sites include Barmaksyzkaya and Edzani-Zurtaketi. [3] In Edzani, an Upper Paleolithic site, a significant percentage of the artifacts are made of obsidian. [4]

The Caucasian-Anatolian area of Trialetian culture was adjacent to the Iraqi-Iranian Zarzian culture to the east and south as well as the Levantine Natufian to the southwest. [5] Alan H. Simmons describes the culture as "very poorly documented". [6] In contrast, recent excavations in the Valley of Qvirila river, to the north of the Trialetian region, display a Mesolithic culture.[ citation needed ] The subsistence of these groups were based on hunting Capra caucasica , wild boar and brown bear. [7]

Distribution of the Trialetian according to Kozlowski and Kaczanowska (2004) Map of Trialetian.png
Distribution of the Trialetian according to Kozłowski and Kaczanowska (2004)

Trialetian sites

Caucasus and Transcaucasia:

Eastern Anatolia:

Trialetian influences can also be found in:

Southeast of the Caspian Sea:

The belonging of these Caspian Mesolithic sites to the Trialetian has been questioned. [11]

Relation with the Caspian Mesolithic

Differences have been found [11] between the Trialetian and the Caspian Mesolithic of the southeastern part of the Caspian Sea (represented by sites like Komishan, Hotu, Kamarband and Ali Tepe), even though the Caspian Mesolithic had previously been attributed to Trialetian by Kozłowski (1994, 1996 and 1999), Kozłowski and Aurenche 2005 and Peregrine and Ember 2002. These differences have been established through a detailed study of the site of Komishan and are driven by the underlying differences at the level of cultural ecology.

While Trialetian industry developed in steppe riparian and mountain ecozones, as for example in the Khrami river and the mountainous site of Chokh respectively, the Caspian Mesolithic took place in a transitional ecotone between the sea (Caspian Sea), plain and mountains (Alborz mountain range). The Caspian Mesolithic hunter-gatherers were adapted to the exploitation of marine resources and had access to high quality raw material, whereas in the Trialetian sites as Chokh and Trialeti there is imported raw material from distances of 100 km.

Relation with Kmlo-2

Kmlo-2 is a rock shelter situated on the west slope of the Kasakh River valley, [12] on the Aragats massif, in Armenia. This site seems to present three different phases of occupation (11-10k cal BC, 9-8k cal BC and 6-5k cal BC). [12] [13] [14] The lithic industry of the three phases show similarities such as the predominance of microliths, small cores and obsidian as raw material. [12] [14] The backed an scalene bladelets are the dominant type of microlith; these tools show similarities with those of the Late Upper Paleolithic of Kalavan-1 and the Mesolithic layer B of the Kotias Klde. [14] Cultural affinities of the Kmlo-2 lithic industry with the Epipaleolithic and Aceramic Neolithic sites in Taurus-Zagros mountains have also been noted. [15]

Let us quote a few words from Gasparyan [14] about the industry found in Apnagyugh-8 (Kmlo-2) cave that express these similarities:

Let us conclude that Apnagyugh-8 industry is closer to the production complexes with traditions of Mesolithic and/or Upper Paleolithic periods. But it’s difficult to show any culture or archaeological source in Armenia today, which belongs to these periods, preceding Apnagyugh-8 and could have been its origin or prototype. The only site that emerged before Apnagyugh-8 is Kalavan-1, an Upper Paleolithic site dating to 16th–14th millennia B.C., where microliths of geometrical forms are fully absent. Though Apnagyugh-8 industry shows some similarities with Zarzian and Trialeti cultures, analytic studies for proving this comparison are still in the process.

Layer III of Kmlo-2 contained the so-called “Kmlo tools”. [16] Kmlo tools are characterized by "continuous and parallel retouch by pressure flaking of one or both lateral edges". [12] Similar tools have been found, as the associated to the Paluri-Nagutny culture in Georgia), [12] the so-called "Çayönü tools” (Çayönü, Cafer Höyük, Shimshara), [12] [13] found in Neolithic sites from the 8th to 7th millennia BC in eastern Anatolia and northern Mesopotamia, and some found in the layer A2 of the Kotias Klde cave. [16] It has been suggested that the Kmlo tools are distinctive features of a culture established circa 9-8k cal BC on the highlands of western Armenia and continued at least until the 6th-5th millennia calBC. [13] A local development of the Kmlo tools has also been hypothesized. [13]

Final phase

Little is known about the end of the Trialetian. 6k BC has been proposed as the time on which the decline phase took place. [9] From this date are the first evidence of the Jeitunian, an industry that has probably evolved from the Trialetian. Also from this date are the first pieces of evidence of Neolithic materials in the Belt cave.

In the southwest corner of the Trialetian region it has been proposed [9] that this culture evolved towards a local version of the PPNB around 7k BC, in sites as Cafer Höyük.

Kozłowski suggests that the Trialetian does not seem to have continuation in the Neolithic of Georgia (as for example in Paluri and Kobuleti). Although in the 5k BC certain microliths similar to those of the Trialetian reappear in Shulaveris Gora (see Shulaveri-Shomu) and Irmis Gora.

Fertile Crescent circa 7500 BC, with main sites of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic period. In this map we can see some sites that have been associated with the Trialetian culture, such as Hallan Cemi and Nevali Cori. Fertile crescent Neolithic B circa 7500 BC.jpg
Fertile Crescent circa 7500 BC, with main sites of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic period. In this map we can see some sites that have been associated with the Trialetian culture, such as Hallan Çemi and Nevali Çori.

Genetics

The genome of a Mesolithic hunter-gatherer individual found at the layer A2 of the Kotias Klde rock shelter in Georgia (labeled KK1), dating from 9,700 BP, has been analysed. This individual forms a genetic cluster with another hunter-gatherer from the Satsurblia Cave, the so-called Caucasian Hunter-Gatherer (CHG) cluster. [17] KK1 belongs to the Y-chromosome haplogroup J2a and mitochondrial haplogroup H13c [17] (an independent analysis [18] has assigned him J2a1b-Y12379*).

Although the belonging of the Caspian Mesolithic to the Trialetian has been questioned, [11] it is worth noting that genetic similarities have been found between an Mesolithic hunther-gatherer from the Hotu cave (labeled Iran_HotuIIIb) dating from 9,100-8,600 BCE and the CHG from Kotias Klde. The Iran_HotuIIIb individual belongs to the Y-chromosome haplogroup J (xJ2a1b3, J2b2a1a1) [19] (an independent analysis [20] yields J2a-CTS1085(xCTS11251,PF5073) -probably J2a2-). Then, both KK1 and Iran_HotuIIIb individuals share a paternal ancestor that lived approximately 18.7k years ago (according to the estimates of yfull [21] ). At the autosomal level it falls in the cluster of the CHG's and the Iranian Neolithic Farmers. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mesolithic</span> Prehistoric period, second part of the Stone Age

The Mesolithic or Middle Stone Age is the Old World archaeological period between the Upper Paleolithic and the Neolithic. The term Epipaleolithic is often used synonymously, especially for outside northern Europe, and for the corresponding period in the Levant and Caucasus. The Mesolithic has different time spans in different parts of Eurasia. It refers to the final period of hunter-gatherer cultures in Europe and Middle East, between the end of the Last Glacial Maximum and the Neolithic Revolution. In Europe it spans roughly 15,000 to 5,000 BP; in the Middle East roughly 20,000 to 10,000 BP. The term is less used of areas farther east, and not at all beyond Eurasia and North Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epipalaeolithic</span> Period in Levantine history

In archaeology, the Epipalaeolithic or Epipaleolithic is a period occurring between the Upper Paleolithic and Neolithic during the Stone Age. Mesolithic also falls between these two periods, and the two are sometimes confused or used as synonyms. More often, they are distinct, referring to approximately the same period of time in different geographic areas. Epipaleolithic always includes this period in the Levant and, often, the rest of the Near East. It sometimes includes parts of Southeast Europe, where Mesolithic is much more commonly used. Mesolithic very rarely includes the Levant or the Near East; in Europe, Epipalaeolithic is used, though not very often, to refer to the early Mesolithic.

Adamantios Sampson is a Greek archaeologist who served as an Inspector of Antiquities for the Greek Administration of Antiquity. Since 1999, he has been a professor in the University of the Aegean, Department of Mediterranean Studies, Rhodes

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shulaveri–Shomu culture</span> Late Stone Age culture in the south Caucasus

The Shulaveri–Shomu culture, also known as the Shulaveri-Shomutepe-Aratashen culture, is an archaeological culture that existed on the territory of present-day Georgia, Azerbaijan, and Armenia, as well as parts of northern Iran during the Late Neolithic/Eneolithic. It lasted from around the end of the seventh millennium BC to the beginning of the fifth millennium BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Armenian hypothesis</span> Hypothesis in Indo-European historical linguistics

The Armenian hypothesis, also known as the Near Eastern model, is a theory of the Proto-Indo-European homeland, initially proposed by linguists Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze and Vyacheslav Ivanov in the early 1980s, which suggests that the Proto-Indo-European language was spoken during the 5th–4th millennia BC in "eastern Anatolia, the southern Caucasus, and northern Mesopotamia".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric Georgia</span> Human habitation in Georgia before written records

The prehistory of Georgia is the period between the first human habitation of the territory of modern-day nation of Georgia and the time when Assyrian and Urartian, and more firmly, the Classical accounts, brought the proto-Georgian tribes into the scope of recorded history.

Prehistoric Armenia refers to the history of the region that would eventually be known as Armenia, covering the period of the earliest known human presence in the Armenian Highlands from the Lower Paleolithic more than 1 million years ago until the Iron Age and the emergence of Urartu in the 9th century BC, the end of which in the 6th century BC marks the beginning of Ancient Armenia.

Belbaşı is a cave and a late Paleolithic/Mesolithic site in southern Turkey, located southwest of Antalya.

The Caucasus region, on the gateway between Southwest Asia, Europe and Central Asia, plays a pivotal role in the peopling of Eurasia, possibly as early as during the Homo erectus expansion to Eurasia, in the Upper Paleolithic peopling of Europe, and again in the re-peopling Mesolithic Europe following the Last Glacial Maximum, and in the expansion associated with the Neolithic Revolution.

Archeological sites in Azerbaijan first gained public interest in the mid-19th century and were reported by European travellers.

The Sands of Beirut were a series of archaeological sites located on the coastline south of Beirut in Lebanon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistory of Iran</span>

The prehistory of the Iranian plateau, and the wider region now known as Greater Iran, as part of the prehistory of the Near East is conventionally divided into the Paleolithic, Epipaleolithic, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age periods, spanning the time from the first settlement by archaic humans about a million years ago until the beginning of the historical record during the Neo-Assyrian Empire, in the 8th century BC.

Prehistoric technology is technology that predates recorded history. History is the study of the past using written records. Anything prior to the first written accounts of history is prehistoric, including earlier technologies. About 2.5 million years before writing was developed, technology began with the earliest hominids who used stone tools, which they first used to hunt food, and later to cook.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Outline of prehistoric technology</span> Overview of and topical guide to prehistoric technology

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to prehistoric technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Epigravettian</span> European Upper Paleolithic culture

The Epigravettian was one of the last archaeological industries and cultures of the European Upper Paleolithic. It emerged after the Last Glacial Maximum around ~21,000 cal. BP or 19,050 BC, and is considered to be a cultural derivative of the Gravettian culture. Initially named Tardigravettian in 1964 by Georges Laplace in reference to several lithic industries found in Italy, it was later renamed in order to better emphasize its independent character.

The Cave of Dzhebel is an archeological site near the Krasnovodsk Gulf of the Caspian Sea in Turkmenistan. First explored by Alexey Okladnikov in 1949 and 1950, the site revealed Mesolithic, Neolithic and early Bronze Age artefacts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caucasus hunter-gatherer</span> Anatomically modern human genetic lineage identified in 2015

Caucasus hunter-gatherer (CHG), also called Satsurblia cluster, is an anatomically modern human genetic lineage, first identified in a 2015 study, based on the population genetics of several modern Western Eurasian populations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Araya Site</span> Japanese Paleolithic settlement

The Araya Site is an archaeological site with the traces of a late Japanese Paleolithic settlement located in the former town of Kawaguchi in what is now part of the city of Nagaoka, Niigata in the Hokuriku region of Japan. It was found to contain one of the largest number of stone tools of any site thus far discovered in Japan. It was designated a National Historic Site of Japan in 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anna Belfer-Cohen</span> Israeli archaeologist

Anna Belfer-Cohen is an Israeli archaeologist and paleoanthropologist and Professor Emeritus at the Institute of Archaeology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Belfer-Cohen excavated and studied many important prehistoric sites in Israel including Hayonim and Kebara Caves and open-air sites such as Nahal Ein Gev I and Nahal Neqarot. She has also worked for many years in the Republic of Georgia, where she made important contributions to the study of the Paleolithic sequence of the Caucasus following her work at the cave sites of Dzoudzuana, Kotias and Satsrublia. She is a specialist in biological Anthropology, prehistoric art, lithic technology, the Upper Paleolithic and modern humans, the Natufian-Neolithic interface and the transition to village life.

Osmantəpə is an early Neolithic settlement near Kükü village in the Şahbuz district in the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic.

References

  1. Anna Stolberg: Glossar In: Vor 12.000 Jahren in Anatolien. Die ältesten Monumente der Menschheit, Badisches Landesmuseum Karlsruhe (ed.), Stuttgart 2007, pg. 375–377, here: pg. 377.
  2. Frédérique Brunet: Asie centrale: vers une redéfinition des complexes culturels de la fin du Pléistocène et des débuts de l’Holocène, in: Paléorient 28,2 (2002) pg. 9-24.
  3. Nikolay I. Burchak-Abramovich, Oleg Grigor'evich Bendukidze: Fauna epipaleoliticheskoy stoyanki Zurtaketi, in: SANGSSR 55,3 (1969) pg. 32-33.
  4. Karine Khristoforovna Kushnareva: The Southern Caucasus in Prehistory. Stages of Cultural and Socioeconomic Development from the Eighth to the Second Millennium B.C., University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology, 1997, pg. 9.
  5. Nach Henri de Cotenson in: Syria, tomus 80, 2003, 270-271, here: pg. 271; Besprechung zu Marcel Otte (ed.): Préhistoire d’Anatolie. Genèse de deux mondes. Actes du Colloque international, Liège, 28 avril-3 mai 1997. Liège 1998.
  6. Alan H. Simmons says the culture is "very poorly documented" (Alan H. Simmons: The Neolithic Revolution in the Near East. Transforming the Human Landscape, University of Arizona Press, 2011, pg. 53).
  7. Ofer Bar-Yosef: Upper palaeolithic hunter-gatherers in western Asia, in: Vicki Cummings, Peter Jordan, Marek Zvelebil (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology and Anthropology of Hunter-Gatherers, Oxford University Press, 2014, pg. 252–278, here: pg. 265 ff.
  8. J. K. Kozlowski, M. Kaczanowska (2004). "Gravettian/Epigravettian sequences in the Balkans and Anatolia". Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry. 4 - Issue 1: 5–18.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stefan Karol Kozłowski: The Trialetian “Mesolithic” industry of the Caucasus, Transcaspia, Eastern Anatolia, and the Iranian Plateau. In: Stefan Karol Kozłowski, Hans Georg Gebel (ed.): Neolithic chipped stone industries of the Fertile Crescent, and their contemporaries in adjacent regions. Studies in Early Near Eastern Production, Subsistence and Environment 3, Berlin 1996, pg. 161–170
  10. 1 2 3 4 Sagona, Antonio (November 2017). The Archaeology of the Caucasus by Antonio Sagona. Cambridge Core. doi:10.1017/9781139061254. ISBN   9781139061254 . Retrieved 2019-06-15.
  11. 1 2 3 Vahdati Nasab, Hamed; Jayez, Mozhgan (2016). "A separation: Caspian Mesolithic vs Trialetian lithic industry. A research on the excavated site of Komishan, southeast of the Caspian Sea, Iran". Paléorient. 42 (1): 75–94. doi:10.3406/paleo.2016.5694.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Arimura, Makoto; Chataigner, Christine; Gasparyan, Boris (2009). "Kmlo 2. An Early Holocene Site in Armenia" (PDF). Neo-Lithics 2/09. The Newsletter of Southwest Asian Neolithic Research: 17–19.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Arimura, Makoto; Badalyan, Ruben; Gasparyan, Boris; Chataigner, Christine (2010). "Current Neolithic Research in Armenia" (PDF). Neo-Lithics 1/10: 77–85.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Gasparyan, Boris; Petrosyan, Arthur (2015). "Tools with an abrupt, regular, sub-parallel retouch from the Armenian Highlands and the Near East: "Apnagyugh tools", "lekala" or "Hook-Like tools" and "Çayönü tools". ARAMAZD, Armenian Journal of Near Eastern Studies (AJNES). IX (2).
  15. Arimura, Makoto; Gasparyan, Boris; Chataigner, Christine (2012). Curtis, J.E.; Matthews, R.J.; Chapman, R.; Fletcher, A.; Gascoigne, Alison L.; Glatz, C.; Simpson, St.J.; Seymour, M.J.; Taylor, H.; Tubb, J.N. (eds.). "Prehistoric sites in Northwest Armenia: Kmlo-2 and Tsaghkahovit" (PDF). Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of the Archaeology of the Ancient. 3: Fieldwork and Recent Research – Posters, Harrasowitz, Wiesbaden: 135–150.
  16. 1 2 Varoutsiko s, Bastien; Mgeladze, Ana; Chahoud, Jwana; Gabunia, Manana; Agapishvili, Tamar; Martin, Lucie; Chataigner, Christine (2017). "From the Mesolithic to the Chalcolithic in the South Caucasus: New data from the Bavra Ablari rock shelter" (PDF). In Batmaz A.; Bedianashvili G.; Michalewicz A.; Robinson A. (eds.). Context and Connection: Essays on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East in Honour of Antonio Sagona. Leuven: Peeters.
  17. 1 2 Bradley, Daniel G.; Pinhasi, Ron; Manica, Andrea; Hofreiter, Michael; Lordkipanidze, David; Currat, Mathias; Higham, Thomas F. G.; Jakeli, Nino; Matskevich, Zinovi (2015-11-16). "Upper Palaeolithic genomes reveal deep roots of modern Eurasians". Nature Communications. 6: 8912. doi:10.1038/ncomms9912. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   4660371 . PMID   26567969.
  18. "J-Y12379*". yfull. Retrieved June 15, 2019.
  19. Iosif Lazaridis et al. The genetic structure of the world's first farmers, 2016.
  20. First ancient J2 from Iran (Mesolithic, Copper Age) and Levant (Bronze Age) – Lazaridis et al. first farmers
  21. "J2 YTree". yfull. Retrieved June 15, 2019.
  22. Reich, David; Pinhasi, Ron; Patterson, Nick; Hovhannisyan, Nelli A.; Yengo, Loic; Wilson, James F.; Torroni, Antonio; Tönjes, Anke; Stumvoll, Michael (August 2016). "Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East". Nature. 536 (7617): 419–424. doi:10.1038/nature19310. ISSN   1476-4687. PMC   5003663 . PMID   27459054.

Literature