We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity

Last updated
We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity
We Real Cool.jpg
Cover of the first edition
Author bell hooks
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Subject Masculinity
Publication date
2004
Media typePrint
ISBN 0415969271
bell hooks in 2009 Bellhooks.jpg
bell hooks in 2009

We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity is a 2004 book about masculinity by feminist author bell hooks. It collects ten essays on black men. The title alludes to Gwendolyn Brooks' 1959 poem "We Real Cool". The essays are intended to provide cultural criticism and solutions to the problems she identifies. [1]

Contents

Hooks suggests that black men are forced to repress themselves in white America. She suggests the ways in which racist and sexist attitudes developed in American culture have criminalized and dehumanized black men, and the ways in which these myths have harmed the black community. Hooks states that she believes that hip-hop as a whole strongly reflects imperialist white supremacist capitalist patriarchy. [2]

bell hooks

bell hooks” is the pen name used by Gloria Jean Watkins. [3] She was an American author and social activist who was Distinguished Professor in Residence at Berea College. She was an American author and social activist who was Distinguished Professor in Residence at Berea College. She is best known for her writings on race, feminism, and class. [4] [5]

Summary

"Preface about black men: don't believe the hype" addresses the public perception of black masculinity and its stereotypes. hooks opens by critiquing Ellis Cose's The Envy of the World: On Being a Black Man in America. She argues Cose limits his cultural analysis of race in America by refraining from discussing contemporary political issues, neglecting Malcolm X and W. E. B. Du Bois's theories of civil rights, and offering few means of subverting racial stereotypes and social issues. Black men suffer, in hooks' view, from what she terms imperialist white supremacist capitalist patriarchy. She writes: "Allegiance to sexist thinking about the nature of leadership creates a blind spot that effectively prevents masses of black people from making use of theories and practices of liberation when they are offered by women." [6] hooks uses examples of her family life, specifically her father and brother, to document "patriarchal domination" of black male thought, and argues for radicalized intersectionality. "Anyone who claims to be concerned with the fate of black men in the United States," hooks writes, "who does not speak about the need for them to radicalize their consciousness to challenge patriarchy ... colludes with the existing system in keeping black men in their place, psychologically locked down, locked out." [7]

"Plantation patriarchy" centers on African masculinity that predated the beginning of the Atlantic slave trade. Rather than subjugating indigenous people along racial lines, hooks claims African explorers of the Americas inherited patriarchal practices against women. She discusses gender relations under slavery and, while affirming Frederick Douglass's and Martin Delany's support of the equality of the sexes, argues black men in general held patriarchal attitudes toward their spouses: "[Freed male slaves] wanted black women to conform to the gender norms set by white society. They wanted to be recognized as ‘men,' as patriarchs, by other men, including white men. Yet they could not assume this position if black women were not willing to conform to prevailing sexist gender norms". [8] hooks continues by arguing these problematic notions became the norm in black men from the early 20th century to the present day. To argue this point, hooks cites the discrepancies between Amy Jacques Garvey's activism and her husband Marcus's, and the scholarship of others who researched black gender roles in the United States. Some of it hooks found insightful, such as E. Franklin Frazier's The Negro Family in the United States, while others she found distasteful, such as Norman Podhoretz's My Negro Problem—And Ours . hooks criticizes the latter along with Daniel Patrick Moynihan's The Negro Family for positing black men were sexually more potent than white men, and/or emasculated by women for by their breadwinner status.

"gangsta culture: a piece of the action" discusses economic barriers black men face in greater depth, focusing mainly on the 1960s. hooks argues that patriarchal notions of manhood have equated financial excess as the masculine ideal. As a result of this and a disdain for hierarchical power structures within the working economy black men turn to alternative professions: professional sports, music (jazz, blues, and hip-hop mostly) and crime. hooks cites Muhammad Ali as an influential figure in "assert[ing] a black male identity distinct from the stereotype" of silent, emotionless, and materialistic male leaders." [9] At the same time hooks argues white supremacists have portrayed Ali as a "silent symbol of brute strength without an intelligent voice ... the eunuch who comes when his master speaks." [10] To remedy this hooks calls for black communities to affirm the legacies of Ali, Malcolm X, and King, Jr., to challenge equating wealth with masculine success and unemployment as failure, and to lessen the influence of film and television that, hooks argues, trains black youth to join violent street gangs.

The following chapter, titled "schooling black males" discusses a similar phenomenon with education. Black boys are discouraged from reading by the scarcity of books in many black families and communities, unspoken racial hierarchies in many public schooling, and traditional mass media. hooks uses the fictional character of Steve Urkel as an example of the emasculation that black boys face in the public sphere for showing a desire to become educated. To combat this phenomenon hooks argues in favor of mass literacy campaigns, homeschooling, private schooling and progressive education as tools to encourage education among black men and to subvert patriarchal notions of black masculinity.

"Don't make me hurt you: black male violence" evaluates the measure: black men are encouraged to commit acts of violence. hooks argues that depictions of African-Americans in films like The Shawshank Redemption and The Green Mile , as well as media portrayal of the O. J. Simpson murder trial racialize black men as examples of hyper-masculine violence, and again draws comparisons to the Civil Rights Movement. She argues opponents of civil rights would greatly benefit from armed resistance, as it would erode the platform of the movement and encourage white allies to erode from their ranks. At the same time hooks concedes that violence played a pivotal role in the advocacy of Stokely Carmichael and other black advocates. The problems with black violence, as she sees it, are that it echoes patriarchal, sexist messages of masculinity, it is often experienced within the family and between members of the same race, and that it is often the expression of a more insidious rage. "To end our cultural fascination with violence, and our imposition onto men in general and black men in particular ... we must choose a partnership model that posits interbeing as the principle around which to organize family and community." [11]

Chapter 5 is titled "it's a dick thing: beyond sexual acting out". It discusses the inability of black men to claim a healthy sexuality throughout time. In slave society black men were distorted as violent rapists, lynched and often castrated for supposed deviant sexual acts. As a consequence of this, black men were claimed to have an unmatched sexual prowess envied by whites. hooks argues these myths originate from whites' projection of torture, enslavement and rape of black men and women under slave society. To rebel against this, free black men and women attempted to reclaim erotic sexual love, but as hooks argues, succumbed to patriarchal notions of sexuality: namely, that sexual prowess equates to true manhood and that women were always penetrated during intercourse. Many black men who did not seek to challenge the stereotype of intense sexual prowess embraced it by romanticizing prostitution and pimping. hooks discusses misogyny in rap music, films like Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song and the rape of young black boys as other examples of patriarchal black sexuality. Rape at the hands of adult male perpetrators or an adult female prostitute, scars children and objectifies black men. To combat this, hooks calls for a "new kind of sex" that "refuses to ground sexual acts in narratives of domination and submission" [12] as well as promoting sexual healing therapy among the black community.

Themes

This novel deals with themes surrounding the many societal challenges and pressures black men face in a patriarchal society. The book negotiates the nature of racial injustice, gender roles, and feminism throughout its chapters.

Masculinity

Layered throughout the novel is the idea of how a traditional “cool” black man is supposed to act. Typically, being “cool” refers to a black man’s ability to withstand many trials and tribulations. They are expected to face all their challenges head on, as opposed to adopting a “poor me” mentality [13]

Patriarchy

The book discusses the typical societal view of how “traditional” black men and black women are supposed to act. This is evident in how the novel discusses how black men and women are expected to conform to “societal norms” if they are to be accepted and recognized in society. [13]

Reception

We Real Cool was received with mixed reviews upon initial release. Sarah Gold of Publishers Weekly commented that hooks was "a writer of extraordinary skill"., but one who "pads out her insights with lengthy quotations from many sources, which thin but don't fully dilute her revolutionary message of love." [14] Vernon Ford of Booklist echoed concerns that hooks relied too heavily on feminist ideology. Nevertheless, his review was generally positive: " [Hook's] recollections of her own family experiences and growing up black in America reflect extraordinary insight into both our cultural frailties and our potential. Readers interested in black cultural issues from a feminist perspective will enjoy this book." [15]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Aint I a Woman?</i> (book) 1981 Black feminist book by bell hooks

Ain't I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism is a 1981 book by bell hooks titled after Sojourner Truth's "Ain't I a Woman?" speech. hooks examines the effect of racism and sexism on Black women, the civil rights movement, and feminist movements from suffrage to the 1970s. She argues that the convergence of sexism and racism during slavery contributed to Black women having the lowest status and worst conditions of any group in American society. White female abolitionists and suffragists were often more comfortable with Black male abolitionists such as Frederick Douglass, while southern segregationalists and stereotypes of Black female promiscuity and immorality caused protests whenever Black women spoke. hooks points out that these white female reformers were more concerned with white morality than the conditions these morals caused Black Americans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Misogyny</span> Prejudice against, or hatred of, women

Misogyny is hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against women or girls. It is a form of sexism that can keep women at a lower social status than men, thus maintaining the social roles of patriarchy. Misogyny has been widely practised for thousands of years. It is reflected in art, literature, human societal structure, historical events, mythology, philosophy, and religion worldwide.

Misandry is the hatred of, contempt for, or prejudice against men or boys.

Radical feminism is a perspective within feminism that calls for a radical re-ordering of society in which male supremacy is eliminated in all social and economic contexts, while recognizing that women's experiences are also affected by other social divisions such as in race, class, and sexual orientation. The ideology and movement emerged in the 1960s.

Dominator culture refers to a model of society where fear and force maintain rigid understandings of power and superiority within a hierarchical structure. Futurist and writer Riane Eisler first popularized this term in her book The Chalice and the Blade. In it, Eisler positions the dominator model in contrast to the partnership model, a more egalitarian structure of society founded on mutual respect among its inhabitants. In dominator culture, men rule over women, whereas partnership culture values men and women equally.

Pro-feminism refers to support of the cause of feminism without implying that the supporter is a member of the feminist movement. The term is most often used in reference to men who actively support feminism and its efforts to bring about the political, economic, cultural, personal, and social equality of women with men. A number of pro-feminist men are involved in political activism, most often in the areas of gender equality, women's rights, and ending violence against women.

The men's movement is a social movement that emerged in the 1960s and 1970s, primarily in Western countries, which consists of groups and organizations of men and their allies who focus on gender issues and whose activities range from self-help and support to lobbying and activism.

The men's liberation movement is a social movement critical of the restraints which society imposes on men. Men's liberation activists are generally sympathetic to feminist standpoints.

<i>Black Sexual Politics</i> 2004 book

Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender and the New Racism by Patricia Hill Collins is a work of critical theory that discusses the way that race, class and gender intersect to affect the lives of African American men and women in many different ways, but with similar results. The book explores the way that new forms of racism can work to oppress black people, while filling them with messages of liberation.

Since the 19th century, men have taken part in significant cultural and political responses to feminism within each "wave" of the movement. This includes seeking to establish equal opportunities for women in a range of social relations, generally done through a "strategic leveraging" of male privilege. Feminist men have also argued alongside writers like bell hooks, however, that men's liberation from the socio-cultural constraints of sexism and gender roles is a necessary part of feminist activism and scholarship.

Christianity and domestic violence deals with the debate in Christian communities about the recognition and response to domestic violence, which is complicated by a culture of silence and acceptance among abuse victims. There are some Bible verses that abusers use to justify discipline of their wives.

Patriarchy is a social system in which positions of dominance and privilege are held by men. The term patriarchy is used both in anthropology to describe a family or clan controlled by the father or eldest male or group of males, and in feminist theory to describe a broader social structure in which men as a group dominate women and children.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender in horror films</span>

The representation of gender in horror films, particularly depictions of women, has been the subject of critical commentary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Compulsory heterosexuality</span> Social vision of heterosexuality as the natural inclination or obligation

Compulsory heterosexuality, often shortened to comphet, is the theory that heterosexuality is assumed and enforced upon people by a patriarchal and heteronormative society. The term was popularized by Adrienne Rich in her 1980 essay titled "Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence". According to Rich, social science and literature perpetuate the societal belief that women in every culture are believed to have an innate preference for romantic and sexual relationships with men. She argues that women's sexuality towards men is not always natural but is societally ingrained and scripted into women. Comphet creates the belief that society is overwhelmingly heterosexual and delegitimizes queer identities. As a result, it perpetuates homophobia and legal inequity for the LGBTQ+ community.

Hip hop feminism is a sub-set of black feminism that centers on intersectional subject positions involving race and gender in a way that acknowledges the contradictions in being a black feminist, such as black women's enjoyment in hip hop music and culture, rather than simply focusing on the victimization of black women in hip hop culture due to interlocking systems of oppressions involving race, class, and gender.

Feminist art criticism emerged in the 1970s from the wider feminist movement as the critical examination of both visual representations of women in art and art produced by women. It continues to be a major field of art criticism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Male gaze</span> Concept in feminist theory!

In feminist theory, the male gaze is the act of depicting women and the world in the visual arts and in literature from a masculine, heterosexual perspective that presents and represents women as sexual objects for the pleasure of the heterosexual male viewer. In the visual and aesthetic presentations of narrative cinema, the male gaze has three perspectives: that of the man behind the camera, that of the male characters within the film's cinematic representations; and that of the spectator gazing at the image.

The concept of toxic masculinity is used in academic and media discussions to refer to those aspects of hegemonic masculinity that are socially destructive, such as misogyny, homophobia, and violent domination. These traits are considered "toxic" due in part to their promotion of violence, including sexual assault and domestic violence. Socialization of boys sometimes also normalizes violence, such as in the saying "boys will be boys" about bullying and aggression.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Esmaa Mohamoud</span> African-Canadian sculpture and installation artist

Esmaa Mohamoud, also known as "E," is an African-Canadian sculptor and installation artist who grew up in London, Ontario, and currently practices in Toronto, Ontario. Her work has been shown at the Royal Ontario Museum, McGill University, The Art Gallery of Ontario, YYZ Artist Outlet, The Drake Devonshire Gallery, Art Lab Gallery at Western University, Georgia Scherman Projects, amongst others.


Colonial sexual violence in North America refers to the systems put in place by Europeans through settler colonialism that enforces gender divides, support sexual exploitation, and use patriarchy as a means to control the Indigenous population. These systems not only affected men, women, and two-spirit people differently, but disrupted traditional ways of living in a negative manner which thus removed their identity. As settler colonialism is an ongoing effort, these systems have remained in place and continue to perpetrate harm today as seen through generational trauma related to the residential school system, MMIW, and the Indian Act. Indigenous scholars emphasize the need for community healing and traditional practices to heal the collective traumas, and experiences of sexual violence, enacted through settler colonialism.

References

  1. hooks, bell (December 11, 2003). We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity. Taylor & Francis. ISBN   9780203642207 via Google Books.
  2. hooks, bell (2004). We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity. New York University Press. p. 151. ISBN   0-415-96926-3.
  3. Dinitia Smith (September 28, 2006). "Tough arbiter on the web has guidance for writers". The New York Times. p. E3. Archived from the original on July 3, 2018. Retrieved February 21, 2017. But the Chicago Manual says it is not all right to capitalize the name of the writer bell hooks because she insists that it be lower case.
  4. Knight, Lucy (December 15, 2021). "bell hooks, author and activist, dies aged 69". The Guardian . Archived from the original on December 15, 2021. Retrieved December 15, 2021.
  5. Tikkanen, Amy. "bell hooks | American scholar". www.britannica.com. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 31 March 2022.
  6. hooks, bell (2004). We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity. London: Routledge. p. xiii. ISBN   0-415-96926-3.
  7. . p. xi.{{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  8. . p. 6.{{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  9. . p. 21.{{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  10. . p. 22.{{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  11. . p. 62.{{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  12. . p. 78.{{cite book}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  13. 1 2 Hooks, Bell (2003). We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity (1st ed.). Routledge. ISBN   0415969271.
  14. "Nonfiction Book Review: WE REAL COOL: Black Men and Masculinity by bell hooks, Author . Routledge $17.95 (160p) ISBN 978-0-415-96927-7". PublishersWeekly.com. Publishers Weekly (PW). Retrieved 21 November 2017.
  15. Ford, Vernon (January 2004). "We Real Cool: Black Men and Masculinity". Booklist. 100 (9): 796.

Further reading