Wholeness axiom

Last updated

In mathematics, the wholeness axiom is a strong axiom of set theory introduced by Paul Corazza in 2000. [1]

Contents

Statement

The wholeness axiom states roughly that there is an elementary embedding j from the Von Neumann universe V to itself. This has to be stated carefully to avoid Kunen's inconsistency theorem stating (roughly) that no such embedding exists.

More specifically, as Samuel Gomes da Silva states, "the inconsistency is avoided by omitting from the schema all instances of the Replacement Axiom for j-formulas". [2] Thus, the wholeness axiom differs from Reinhardt cardinals (another way of providing elementary embeddings from V to itself) by allowing the axiom of choice and instead modifying the axiom of replacement. However, Holmes, Forster & Libert (2012) write that Corrazza's theory should be "naturally viewed as a version of Zermelo set theory rather than ZFC". [3]

If the wholeness axiom is consistent, then it is also consistent to add to the wholeness axiom the assertion that all sets are hereditarily ordinal definable. [4] The consistency of stratified versions of the wholeness axiom, introduced by Hamkins (2001), [4] was studied by Apter (2012). [5]

Related Research Articles

Mathematical logic is the study of formal logic within mathematics. Major subareas include model theory, proof theory, set theory, and recursion theory. Research in mathematical logic commonly addresses the mathematical properties of formal systems of logic such as their expressive or deductive power. However, it can also include uses of logic to characterize correct mathematical reasoning or to establish foundations of mathematics.

In mathematics, a cardinal number κ is called huge if there exists an elementary embedding j : VM from V into a transitive inner model M with critical point κ and

In set theory, a universal set is a set which contains all objects, including itself. In set theory as usually formulated, it can be proven in multiple ways that a universal set does not exist. However, some non-standard variants of set theory include a universal set.

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, a rank-into-rank embedding is a large cardinal property defined by one of the following four axioms given in order of increasing consistency strength.

In mathematics, extendible cardinals are large cardinals introduced by Reinhardt (1974), who was partly motivated by reflection principles. Intuitively, such a cardinal represents a point beyond which initial pieces of the universe of sets start to look similar, in the sense that each is elementarily embeddable into a later one.

In the mathematical field of set theory, a large cardinal property is a certain kind of property of transfinite cardinal numbers. Cardinals with such properties are, as the name suggests, generally very "large". The proposition that such cardinals exist cannot be proved in the most common axiomatization of set theory, namely ZFC, and such propositions can be viewed as ways of measuring how "much", beyond ZFC, one needs to assume to be able to prove certain desired results. In other words, they can be seen, in Dana Scott's phrase, as quantifying the fact "that if you want more you have to assume more".

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, an urelement or ur-element is an object that is not a set, but that may be an element of a set. It is also referred to as an atom or individual.

In mathematics, an unfoldable cardinal is a certain kind of large cardinal number.

In mathematical logic, New Foundations (NF) is an axiomatic set theory, conceived by Willard Van Orman Quine as a simplification of the theory of types of Principia Mathematica. Quine first proposed NF in a 1937 article titled "New Foundations for Mathematical Logic"; hence the name. Much of this entry discusses NF with urelements (NFU), an important variant of NF due to Jensen and clarified by Holmes. In 1940 and in a revision in 1951, Quine introduced an extension of NF sometimes called "Mathematical Logic" or "ML", that included proper classes as well as sets.

In mathematical logic, independence is the unprovability of a sentence from other sentences.

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, a reflection principle says that it is possible to find sets that, with respect to any given property, resemble the class of all sets. There are several different forms of the reflection principle depending on exactly what is meant by "resemble". Weak forms of the reflection principle are theorems of ZF set theory due to Montague (1961), while stronger forms can be new and very powerful axioms for set theory.

In mathematics, Vopěnka's principle is a large cardinal axiom. The intuition behind the axiom is that the set-theoretical universe is so large that in every proper class, some members are similar to others, with this similarity formalized through elementary embeddings.

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, a Reinhardt cardinal is a kind of large cardinal. Reinhardt cardinals are considered under ZF, because they are inconsistent with ZFC. They were suggested by American mathematician William Nelson Reinhardt (1939–1998).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Laver</span> American mathematician

Richard Joseph Laver was an American mathematician, working in set theory.

In set theory, the ground axiom states that the universe of set theory is not a nontrivial set-forcing extension of an inner model. The axiom was introduced by Hamkins (2005) and Reitz (2007).

In set theory, a branch of mathematics, Kunen's inconsistency theorem, proved by Kenneth Kunen (1971), shows that several plausible large cardinal axioms are inconsistent with the axiom of choice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joel David Hamkins</span> American mathematician

Joel David Hamkins is an American mathematician and philosopher who is O'Hara Professor of Philosophy and Mathematics at the University of Notre Dame. He has made contributions in mathematical and philosophical logic, set theory and philosophy of set theory, in computability theory, and in group theory.

The Higher Infinite: Large Cardinals in Set Theory from their Beginnings is a monograph in set theory by Akihiro Kanamori, concerning the history and theory of large cardinals, infinite sets characterized by such strong properties that their existence cannot be proven in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZFC). This book was published in 1994 by Springer-Verlag in their series Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, with a second edition in 2003 in their Springer Monographs in Mathematics series, and a paperback reprint of the second edition in 2009 (ISBN 978-3-540-88866-6).

References

  1. Corazza, Paul (2000), "The Wholeness Axiom and Laver Sequences", Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 105 (1–3): 157–260, doi: 10.1016/s0168-0072(99)00052-4
  2. Samuel Gomes da Silva, Review of "The wholeness axioms and the class of supercompact cardinals" by Arthur Apter.
  3. Holmes, M. Randall; Forster, Thomas; Libert, Thierry (2012), "Alternative set theories", Sets and extensions in the twentieth century, Handb. Hist. Log., vol. 6, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 559–632, doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51621-3.50008-6, MR   3409865 .
  4. 1 2 Hamkins, Joel David (2001), "The wholeness axioms and V = HOD", Archive for Mathematical Logic, 40 (1): 1–8, arXiv: math/9902079 , doi:10.1007/s001530050169, MR   1816602, S2CID   15083392 .
  5. Apter, Arthur W. (2012), "The wholeness axioms and the class of supercompact cardinals", Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Mathematics, 60 (2): 101–111, doi:10.4064/ba60-2-1, MR   2914539 .