Air travel demand reduction

Last updated
UK
air travel by income quintile through time Annual air transport consumption in the UK by income quintile, 1920-2019.jpg
UK air travel by income quintile through time

Air travel demand mitigation or aviation demand reduction [2] [3] [4] or air travel demand reduction [5] [6] [7] [8] is a part of transportation demand management and climate change mitigation. [9] [10]

Contents

Inhibition of a large or general growth in demand or reduction of demand and need for flights is considered an important part of climate change mitigation as air travel has a substantial impact on the climate. Changes in "behavioral travel parameters can significantly impact the projections for travel demand and the associated energy use and CO2 emissions". [11]

Significance to global air travel emissions reduction

Aviation is one of three sectors identified in a study where "demand-side options" can have a large effect in "reaching SDS levels". [12] According to a study, the attainment of the 1.5–2°C global temperature goal necessitates substantial demand reductions in the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight, and industry, should large-scale negative emissions not be realized. [13] According to the IMAGE model used to project scenarios aimed at limiting global temperature increases to 1.5°C and 2°C, it is suggested that achieving deep decarbonization within the aviation sector within the specified timeframe is contingent upon a reduction in air travel in certain markets. [13] The decreases in carbon intensity of aviation energy in net-zero scenarios "are heavily dependent on projected changes in aviation demand and energy intensity". [14] The significant challenges of sustainable aviation fuel expansion, including food security, local community impacts, and land use issues, underscore the importance of simultaneous demand reduction efforts. [14] For instance, according to a report by the Royal Society, to produce enough biofuel to supply the UK's aviation industry would require using half of Britain's farming land which would put major pressures on food supplies. [15] [16]

Tourism is projected to generate up to 40% of total global CO2 emissions by 2050. [17] Of climate change mitigation consumption options investigated by a review, the consumption options with "the highest mitigation potential advocate reduction in car and air travel". [18] A study projected a potential reduction of "transport direct CO2 emissions by around 50% in the end of the century compared to the baseline" via combined behavioral factors. [11]

Measures

According to the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, "the greatest Avoid potential" in demand-side mitigation, which consists of Avoid-Shift-Improve (ASI) options, "comes from reducing long-haul aviation and providing short-distance low-carbon urban infrastructure". [10] It lists the following related mobility measures: [10]

It found that socio-cultural factors promoting a preference for train travel over long-haul flights have the potential to reduce aviation greenhouse gas emissions by 10% to 40% by 2050. [10]

Role of targeted measures in demand mitigation

Production of an Airbus A321 in 2013, the most used aircraft as of 2022
with more of the product line entering the market as of 2023 A321 final assembly (9351765668).jpg
Production of an Airbus A321 in 2013, the most used aircraft as of 2022 with more of the product line entering the market as of 2023

The IPCC report also concluded that "voluntary behaviour change can support emissions reduction, but behaviours that are not convenient to change are unlikely to shift without changes to policy". [19] A study demonstrated varying attitudes towards environmental measures across different contexts. While voluntary measures like carbon offsetting faced skepticism, there was more willingness to accept regulatory measures, including government intervention through taxation. The study concluded that voluntary approaches alone would be insufficient, emphasizing the need for a diverse policy mix to promote behavioral change in public flying habits. [17] The response of governments "has been to encourage voluntary public behaviour change towards lower carbon lifestyles; an approach that has failed to gain traction in the context of discretionary tourist air travel". [17]

Cities can increase the capability of citizens to make sustainable choices such as by "changing urban form to increase locational and mobility options and providing feedback mechanisms to support socio-behavioural change". [19] Socio-politico-technical feedback processes could "be decisive for climate policy and emissions outcomes". [20] A modal shift away from air transport is complicated by that many people are "used to the current affordability, flexibility and speed of air travel" due to which "passenger acceptance will be a significant barrier to modal shifts and lower cruising speed particularly in wealthy nations". [13] Collective efforts to reduce air-travel-related carbon emissions are much more likely to be successful than isolated attempts. [21]

A 2020 study reported that authors "could not locate quantitative research on large-scale modal shifts and demand reduction in aviation, except during the COVID-19 lockdown." [13]

Related policies have been called "travel demand management" (TDM) policies or "mobility management strategies". [22]

Short-haul flight restrictions

Per capita emissions from domestic and international flights Per-capita-co2-aviation-adjusted.svg
Per capita emissions from domestic and international flights

Restricting short-haul flights has a relatively high potential for reducing emissions (and non-emission forcing). [8] One approach or element of such restrictions could be short-haul flight bans: A short-haul flight ban is a prohibition imposed by governments on airlines to establish and maintain a flight connection over a certain distance , or by organisations or companies on their employees for business travel using existing flight connections over a certain distance, in order to mitigate the environmental impact of aviation (most notably to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions which is the leading cause of climate change ). In the 21st century, several governments, organisations and companies have imposed restrictions and even prohibitions on short-haul flights, stimulating or pressuring travellers to opt for more environmentally friendly means of transportation , especially trains . [23]

Improvement of train infrastructure

The Taiwan High Speed Rail in 2007 Taiwan High Speed Rail (0291).JPG
The Taiwan High Speed Rail in 2007
Networks of major high speed rail operators in Europe, ~2018 Networks of Major High Speed Rail Operators in Europe.gif
Networks of major high speed rail operators in Europe, ~2018

A shift towards high-speed rail could replace air travel. [24] [10] While improvements in rail travel times "have resulted in reductions in short-haul air travel", substitution results vary. [25] Notably, concurrent "expansion of low-cost carriers has led to a significant increase in total European air traffic". [25] Air travel demand decreased significantly after the entry of the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail. [26] Costs of train trips are often higher but can in some cases "be offset by travelling on an overnight train and avoiding the cost of a hotel room". [27]

In studies up to 2022, levels of air traffic reduction from substitution by rail ranged between 7% and 28% – for example, one study estimated that about 17% of intra-European short- and medium-haul traffic can be substituted by rail with an up to 20% increase in travel time. Not considering complementary concurrent measures, another study estimated that air traffic could be reduced by 25% if high-speed rail were available between all major cities. [7] One study from 2005 found there "recently been a rather large reduction of between 34% and 75% in domestic aviation demand in Korea", identifying "the introduction of several new highway services and the fact that Korea Train Express (KTX) began operating a route between Seoul and Daegu in April 2004" as the "two primary causes". [28]

Train connections can reduce feeder flights. [29] [ better source needed ]

Regional travel

Local holidays can avoid emissions. [10] Boosting or building "travel bubbles" (limited-range tourism) "through other means of transport like train services with landlocked countries" and encouraging more domestic tourism could help in substantial reductions of air travel demand. Long-distance travel can be replaced with travel along short-haul regional bubbles. [30]

A study suggests that a stronger demand for medium- to long-haul air transport is the main driver of the tourism industry's increasing greenhouse gas emissions. [31] A 2014 study notes that the travel sector could compensate for losses from distant-destination travel mitigation, for instance, "by investing in less carbon-intensive (domestic, short-haul) tourism or by raising a small fee on long-haul travel to contribute to a special poverty alleviation fund. [31] It also found that a "reduction in tourist travel distances" has significantly less severe impacts than previously envisioned". [31] It "strongly recommended" that future research examines "impacts of specific policies aimed at reducing the growth of tourism transport demand for long- and medium-haul travel based on the adoption of a more holistic approach and the inclusion of economic aspects in a more systematic manner". [31] Moreover, there also are "negative impacts of the current growth of air transport on the tourism economies in both poor and wealthy countries" as many countries "may attract additional tourists by reducing the distances that people travel", [31] specifically those viably reachable by high-speed rail or other low-carbon modes of transport from domestic and nearby countries.[ citation needed ]

A study indicates promotion of low-carbon travel markets could play a role and noted that "[l]ong-haul markets are [...] generally much more carbon-intensive than visitors from proximal (nearby) source markets, even though they tend to stay longer and spend more per journey". It also noted that destination country governments could contribute to optimizing the demand mix proactively and that the "current approach toward the tourism market mix is largely passive". [32]

Changes to international conferences

Most international professional or academic conference attendants travel by plane, conference travel is often regarded as an employee benefit as costs are supported by employers. [33] The Tyndall Centre has reported means to change common institutional and professional practices. [34] [35] [ which? ] Environmental impacts of in-person conferences can also be reduced via "multi-site" or "multi-hub hybrid conferences" with "spatially optimized conference hubs". [36]

Air travel infrastructure

Building new or larger airports increase greenhouse gas emissions. [37] A "limit to airport expansion" could suppress demand. [13] Concerning constraints to individual airports' capacities, one study suggests that "airlines would adjust operations within a constrained flight network in such a way as to avoid airports with high delays". [38] The large expansion in air travel over the last decades has been facilitated by the increased network of airports along with the "relative cheapness of flights (compared to other travel modes), greater incomes and more available leisure time". [9]

Economics

Changes in prices – mainly concurrent increases and decreases in ticket prices – "will impact air transport demand and supply characteristics", making travelers consider alternative travel modes. [21] [38] [8] While demand does not appear to be sensitive to small incremental price changes, "particularly for long-haul and business trips", more significant price increases could significantly suppress demand. [13] [21] High carbon taxes may be needed for shifts to high-speed trains. [39] Distance-based air passenger taxes through increased ticket prices could reduce demand, depending on the tax level and price elasticity. [40] Taxes may be especially effective "if there is a direct link between punishing polluting behaviour and investments that benefit many". [41] Targeted interventions could make not only air travel more expensive but also train tickets cheaper using, for instance, subsidies. [42]

Humans who travel have a "Travel Time Budget (TTB) and Travel Money Budget (TMB)". [11]

Norms, social feedback, psychology, and awareness

Current norms may promote unsustainable behaviors like frequent flying. [43] [ additional citation(s) needed ] Air travel is relevant to contemporary social capital generation. [21] [ further explanation needed ] (e.g. see standard of living or life activities, interpersonal attraction, social norm, and motivations for travel)

The failure of voluntary policy-independent changes has been partly explained by "contemporary neoliberal western lifestyles" which encourage "unrestrained consumption" of the socioeconomic system's products. [17] The "deeply embedded nature of contemporary tourist air travel in developed societies" has been described as 'air travel addiction' which could be compared to other public health issues and related lobbies. [17] Social media "has been instrumental in creating an interest in frequent air travel". [21] A study notes that declining real cost of air travel "has 'normalized' flying into an everyday activity. [21]

Sustainability education – e.g. about the impacts of aviation, flights and climate change – can also play a role in reducing air travel demand. [42] Moreover, a review finds that if the media stops "uncritical reporting on technology 'solutions'", this would raise feelings of responsibility and if it does "not accept advertisement for air travel", this could reduce demand. [21] There are reports about some implemented bans for advertisements for emissions-intensive products that include cheap short-haul flights. [41]

Information provision, "to encourage and stimulate pro-climate decision-making", and related 'nudging' and social marketing approaches could also play a role. [17] A study outlines potential decision-making or psychological reactions by air travelers "feeling accountable for emissions", including cognitive dissonance. [21]

There are organizations that campaign for targets-based demand management interventions such as removing "the considerable tax breaks the aviation industry receives, through not paying VAT or fuel duty" or "airport expansion" such as UK's AirportWatch [37] [44] and the global Stay Grounded. [45] [46] [47] [48]

Bottom-up voluntary unbeneficial action such as flying less if sustained "could alter social norms can spark collective action and move the needle on policy". It can also alter incentives for top-down decisions including consumer demand and raise expectations for reciprocity as collectively "We punish free riders who don't do their part and reward those who chip in", which could co-trigger some level of further action, for instance from the industry. [43] The Fridays for Future movement prompted "debates regarding the desirability and justifiability of air travel, with evidence of [some subsequent] avoidance and substitution". [21]

Flight shame

In Sweden the concept of "flight shame" or "flygskam" has been cited as a cause of falling air travel. [49] To a small extent, the concept has also spread globally. [21] Swedish rail company SJ AB reports that twice as many Swedish people chose to travel by train instead of by air in summer 2019 compared with the previous year. [50] Swedish airports operator Swedavia reported 4% fewer passengers across its 10 airports in 2019 compared to the previous year despite global growth: a 9% drop for domestic passengers and 2% for international passengers. [51] [ clarification needed ]

Personal carbon allowances

With personal carbon allowances (PCAs), certificates must be used for GHG-intensive activities. If they were implemented, they could also include air travel. [52] [53] [54] [55] According to Sodha, "rationing everyone's flights" – an "individual cap on air travel, that people can trade with each other" – could play a role in climate change mitigation. [56]

In 2021, a study published in Nature Sustainability concluded that PCAs could be a component of climate change mitigation. It found there currently is an open window of opportunity for first trial implementations in climate-conscious technologically advanced countries. PCAs could consist of credit-feedbacks and decreasing default levels of per capita emissions allowances. [57] [58] [59]

A PCA scheme was trialed in the UK with 100 volunteers, showing the technical feasibility of the scheme in 2008. [52] [60] The nature of the traded credits for personal consumption could lead to additional psychology-based impacts (see above) when compared to a carbon tax. [52] A rationing framework may reduce air travel in a fair and just way. [61]

Other

Alternative propulsion has limited near-term potential, as commercial availability of such designs is expected only after 2030. [65]

Air travel usage and social impacts

Global distribution of aviation fuel use Global distribution of aviation fuel use.jpg
Global distribution of aviation fuel use
Air transport demand distribution in the USA Air transport demand distribution in the USA.jpg
Air transport demand distribution in the USA
Aviation bunker fuel emissions in the 21 highest emitting Annex I countries Aviation bunker fuel emissions in the 21 highest emitting Annex I countries.jpg
Aviation bunker fuel emissions in the 21 highest emitting Annex I countries
Revenue-passenger kilometers (RPK) and GDP (logarithmic scale) Interrelationships of RPK and GDP (logarithmic scale).jpg
Revenue-passenger kilometers (RPK) and GDP (logarithmic scale)

The aviation industry's emissions are projected to continue to rise – and rapidly so – without related climate policy and demand for air travel is projected to quickly return to its pre-COVID-19 pandemic level. [13] [14] [38]

A study found that "[l]ong-term scenarios generally project a steep increase in global travel demand, leading to an rapid rise in CO2 emissions", with "[m]ajor driving forces" being "the increasing car use in developing countries and the global growth in air travel". [39]

Demand for air travel across countries and population groups is "closely associated with affluence and lifestyle". [14] While "the share of passenger demand is substantially smaller in the Middle East (9%), Latin America and the Caribbean (5%) and Africa (2%), demand in those regions has been rapidly increasing, for example, growing by 234% in the Middle East between 2007 and 2019". [14] It has been estimated that around 90% of people have never flown and 1% of the current population is responsible for 50% of current emissions from flying. [41] [70] [71] It is estimated that, "at most, 11% of the global population flew in 2018, and only 2%–4% traveled between countries". [21] Total aviation demand in 2019 was almost 1 trillion ton-kilometer equivalent with 78% representing passenger flights and 22% freight. [14]

The ICCT estimates that 3% of the global population take regular flights. [72]

Stefan Gössling of the Western Norway Research Institute estimates 1% of the world population emits half of commercial aviation's CO2, while close to 90% does not fly in a given year. [73]

A study finds that "disadvantaged groups" remain far less likely to be "affected by air travel demand management policies because air travel inequality is still at a very high level". [5] Taxes on air travel would raise fewer fairness concerns than other types of carbon taxes. [67] A study notes that in comparison, kinds of frequent flyer levies or levies on excessive consumption in general have the potential to (more easily or inherently) be "equitable, effective and politically acceptable environmental policy". [1]

In early 2022, the European Investment Bank published the results of its 2021–2022 Climate Survey, showing that 52% of Europeans under 30, 37% of people between 30 and 64 and 25% of people aged 65 and above plan to travel by air for their summer holidays in 2022; and 27% of those under 30, 17% for people aged 30–64 and 12% for people aged 65 and above plan to travel by air to a faraway destination. [74]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon tax</span> Tax on carbon emissions

A carbon tax is a tax levied on the carbon emissions from producing goods and services. Carbon taxes are intended to make visible the hidden social costs of carbon emissions. They are designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by essentially increasing the price of fossil fuels. This both decreases demand for goods and services that produce high emissions and incentivizes making them less carbon-intensive. When a fossil fuel such as coal, petroleum, or natural gas is burned, most or all of its carbon is converted to CO2. Greenhouse gas emissions cause climate change. This negative externality can be reduced by taxing carbon content at any point in the product cycle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Biofuel</span> Type of biological fuel

Biofuel is a fuel that is produced over a short time span from biomass, rather than by the very slow natural processes involved in the formation of fossil fuels such as oil. Biofuel can be produced from plants or from agricultural, domestic or industrial biowaste. Biofuels are mostly used for transportation, but can also be used for heating and electricity. Biofuels are regarded as a renewable energy source. The use of biofuel has been subject to criticism regarding the "food vs fuel" debate, varied assessments of their sustainability, and possible deforestation and biodiversity loss as a result of biofuel production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable energy</span> Energy that responsibly meets social, economic, and environmental needs

Energy is sustainable if it "meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." Definitions of sustainable energy usually look at its effects on the environment, the economy, and society. These impacts range from greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution to energy poverty and toxic waste. Renewable energy sources such as wind, hydro, solar, and geothermal energy can cause environmental damage, but are generally far more sustainable than fossil fuel sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change mitigation</span> Actions to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions to limit climate change

Climate change mitigation (or decarbonisation) is action to limit the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that cause climate change. Greenhouse gas emissions are primarily caused by people burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas. Phasing out fossil fuel use can happen by conserving energy and replacing fossil fuels with clean energy sources such as wind, hydro, solar, and nuclear power. Secondary mitigation strategies include changes to land use and removing carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere. Governments have pledged to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but actions to date are insufficient to avoid dangerous levels of climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon footprint</span> Concept to quantify greenhouse gas emissions from activities or products

A carbon footprint (or greenhouse gas footprint) is a calculated value or index that makes it possible to compare the total amount of greenhouse gases that an activity, product, company or country adds to the atmosphere. Carbon footprints are usually reported in tonnes of emissions (CO2-equivalent) per unit of comparison. Such units can be for example tonnes CO2-eq per year, per kilogram of protein for consumption, per kilometer travelled, per piece of clothing and so forth. A product's carbon footprint includes the emissions for the entire life cycle. These run from the production along the supply chain to its final consumption and disposal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Transportation demand management</span> Policies to reduce transportation demands

Transportation demand management or travel demand management (TDM) is the application of strategies and policies to increase the efficiency of transportation systems, that reduce travel demand, or to redistribute this demand in space or in time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black carbon</span> Component of fine particulate matter

Chemically, black carbon (BC) is a component of fine particulate matter. Black carbon consists of pure carbon in several linked forms. It is formed through the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels, biofuel, and biomass, and is one of the main types of particle in both anthropogenic and naturally occurring soot. Black carbon causes human morbidity and premature mortality. Because of these human health impacts, many countries have worked to reduce their emissions, making it an easy pollutant to abate in anthropogenic sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental effects of aviation</span> Effect of emissions from aircraft engines

Aircraft engines produce gases, noise, and particulates from fossil fuel combustion, raising environmental concerns over their global effects and their effects on local air quality. Jet airliners contribute to climate change by emitting carbon dioxide, the best understood greenhouse gas, and, with less scientific understanding, nitrogen oxides, contrails and particulates. Their radiative forcing is estimated at 1.3–1.4 that of CO2 alone, excluding induced cirrus cloud with a very low level of scientific understanding. In 2018, global commercial operations generated 2.4% of all CO2 emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions</span> Sources and amounts of greenhouse gases emitted to the atmosphere from human activities

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from human activities intensify the greenhouse effect. This contributes to climate change. Carbon dioxide, from burning fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, is one of the most important factors in causing climate change. The largest emitters are China followed by the United States. The United States has higher emissions per capita. The main producers fueling the emissions globally are large oil and gas companies. Emissions from human activities have increased atmospheric carbon dioxide by about 50% over pre-industrial levels. The growing levels of emissions have varied, but have been consistent among all greenhouse gases. Emissions in the 2010s averaged 56 billion tons a year, higher than any decade before. Total cumulative emissions from 1870 to 2022 were 703 GtC, of which 484±20 GtC from fossil fuels and industry, and 219±60 GtC from land use change. Land-use change, such as deforestation, caused about 31% of cumulative emissions over 1870–2022, coal 32%, oil 24%, and gas 10%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air transport in the United Kingdom</span>

Air transport in the United Kingdom is the commercial carriage of passengers, freight and mail by aircraft, both within the United Kingdom (UK) and between the UK and the rest of the world. In the past 25 years the industry has seen continuous growth, and the demand for passenger air travel in particular is forecast to increase from the current level of 236 million passengers to 465 million in 2030. One airport, Heathrow Airport, is amongst the top ten busiest airports in the world. More than half of all passengers travelling by air in the UK currently travel via the six London area airports. Outside London, Manchester Airport is by far the largest and busiest of the remaining airports, acting as a hub for the 20 million or so people who live within a two-hour drive. Regional airports have experienced the most growth in recent years, due to the success of low-cost carrier airlines over the last decade.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon dioxide removal</span> Removal of atmospheric carbon dioxide through human activity

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is a process in which carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere by deliberate human activities and durably stored in geological, terrestrial, or ocean reservoirs, or in products. This process is also known as carbon removal, greenhouse gas removal or negative emissions. CDR is more and more often integrated into climate policy, as an element of climate change mitigation strategies. Achieving net zero emissions will require first and foremost deep and sustained cuts in emissions, and then—in addition—the use of CDR. In the future, CDR may be able to counterbalance emissions that are technically difficult to eliminate, such as some agricultural and industrial emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental effects of transport</span>

The environmental effects of transport are significant because transport is a major user of energy, and burns most of the world's petroleum. This creates air pollution, including nitrous oxides and particulates, and is a significant contributor to global warming through emission of carbon dioxide. Within the transport sector, road transport is the largest contributor to global warming.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Individual action on climate change</span> What people can do individually to limit climate change

Individual action on climate change can include personal choices with regards to diet, travel, lifestyle, consumption of goods and services, family size and so on. Individuals can also get active in local and political advocacy work around climate action. People who wish to reduce their carbon footprint, can for example reduce air travel and driving cars, they can eat mainly a plant-based diet, use consumer products for longer, or have fewer children. Avoiding meat and dairy foods has been called "the single biggest way" how an individual can reduce their environmental impact. Scholars find that excessive consumption is more to blame for climate change than population increase. High consumption lifestyles have a greater environmental impact, with the richest 10% of people emitting about half the total lifestyle emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation</span> Voluntary ICAO greenhouse gas emissions scheme

The Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) is a carbon offset and carbon reduction scheme to lower CO2 emissions for international flights, to curb the aviation impact on climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flight shame</span> Social movement that discourages airline flying

Flight shame or flygskam is an anti-flying social movement, with the aim of reducing the environmental impact of aviation. Flight shame refers to an individual's uneasiness over engaging in consumption that is energy-intense and climatically problematic. It also reflects on air travelers as people involved in socially undesirable activities, and adaptive behaviour as described in the related Swedish term smygflyga. It started in 2018 in Sweden and gained traction the following year throughout northern Europe. Flygskam is a Swedish word that literally means "flight shame". The movement discourages people from flying to lower carbon emissions to thwart climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture</span> Agricultures effects on climate change

The amount of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture is significant: The agriculture, forestry and land use sector contribute between 13% and 21% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Emissions come from direct greenhouse gas emissions. and from indirect emissions. With regards to direct emissions, nitrous oxide and methane make up over half of total greenhouse gas emission from agriculture. Indirect emissions on the other hand come from the conversion of non-agricultural land such as forests into agricultural land. Furthermore, there is also fossil fuel consumption for transport and fertilizer production. For example, the manufacture and use of nitrogen fertilizer contributes around 5% of all global greenhouse gas emissions. Livestock farming is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, livestock farming is affected by climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate target</span> Policy for emissions reductions

A climate target, climate goal or climate pledge is a measurable long-term commitment for climate policy and energy policy with the aim of limiting the climate change. Researchers within, among others, the UN climate panel have identified probable consequences of global warming for people and nature at different levels of warming. Based on this, politicians in a large number of countries have agreed on temperature targets for warming, which is the basis for scientifically calculated carbon budgets and ways to achieve these targets. This in turn forms the basis for politically decided global and national emission targets for greenhouse gases, targets for fossil-free energy production and efficient energy use, and for the extent of planned measures for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the environment</span> COVID-19 pandemic on environmental issues and Earths climate

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on the environment, with changes in human activity leading to temporary changes in air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions and water quality. As the pandemic became a global health crisis in early 2020, various national responses including lockdowns and travel restrictions caused substantial disruption to society, travel, energy usage and economic activity, sometimes referred to as the "anthropause". As public health measures were lifted later in the pandemic, its impact has sometimes been discussed in terms of effects on implementing renewable energy transition and climate change mitigation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in South Africa</span> Emissions, impacts and responses of South Africa related to climate change

Climate change in South Africa is leading to increased temperatures and rainfall variability. Evidence shows that extreme weather events are becoming more prominent due to climate change. This is a critical concern for South Africans as climate change will affect the overall status and wellbeing of the country, for example with regards to water resources. Just like many other parts of the world, climate research showed that the real challenge in South Africa was more related to environmental issues rather than developmental ones. The most severe effect will be targeting the water supply, which has huge effects on the agriculture sector. Speedy environmental changes are resulting in clear effects on the community and environmental level in different ways and aspects, starting with air quality, to temperature and weather patterns, reaching out to food security and disease burden.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Climate change in Israel</span>

Israel, like many other countries in the Middle East and North Africa, experiences adverse effects from climate change. Annual and mean temperatures are increasing in Israel, with mean temperature expected to increase between 1.6 and 1.8 °C by 2100. There is a reduction in annual precipitation and delayed winter rains. Israel is already experiencing droughts and water shortages. Heatwaves are other natural hazards expected to increase with climate change.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Fouquet, Roger; O'Garra, Tanya (1 December 2022). "In pursuit of progressive and effective climate policies: Comparing an air travel carbon tax and a frequent flyer levy". Energy Policy. 171: 113278. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113278 . ISSN   0301-4215.
  2. Cohen, Scott A.; Kantenbacher, Joseph (1 February 2020). "Flying less: personal health and environmental co-benefits". Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 28 (2): 361–376. Bibcode:2020JSusT..28..361C. doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1585442. ISSN   0966-9582. S2CID   164752571.
  3. "Identification of levers and levels of ambition for passenger & freight transport in Europe" (PDF). EU Calculator: trade-offs and pathways towards sustainable and low-carbon European Societies – EU Calc. April 2018.
  4. "i The Role of Aviation Demand Reduction in UK Decarbonisation". April 2022. Retrieved 22 May 2023.
  5. 1 2 Büchs, Milena; Mattioli, Giulio (1 October 2021). "Trends in air travel inequality in the UK: From the few to the many?". Travel Behaviour and Society. 25: 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.008 . ISSN   2214-367X.
  6. "Nordic measures to promote sustainable aviation fuels". Proceedings from the Annual Transport Conference at Aalborg University. 2021. ISSN   1603-9696.
  7. 1 2 "VISION 2050 ALIGNING AVIATION WITH THE PARIS AGREEMENT" (PDF). International Council on Clean Transportation. June 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 Heinonen, Jukka; Czepkiewicz, Michał (9 June 2021). "Cities, Long-Distance Travel, and Climate Impacts". Urban Planning. 6 (2): 228–231. doi: 10.17645/up.v6i2.4541 . S2CID   236282594.
  9. 1 2 Morten, Alistair; Gatersleben, Birgitta; Jessop, Donna C. (1 May 2018). "Staying grounded? Applying the theory of planned behaviour to explore motivations to reduce air travel" (PDF). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 55: 297–305. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.038. ISSN   1369-8478.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Creutzig, F.; Roy, J.; Devine-Wright, P.; Díaz-José, J.; et al. (2022). "Chapter 5: Demand, services and social aspects of mitigation" (PDF). IPCC AR6 WG3 2022 . pp. 752–943. doi:10.1017/9781009157926.007. hdl:20.500.11937/88566.
  11. 1 2 3 Girod, Bastien; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; de Vries, Bert (1 April 2013). "Influence of travel behavior on global CO2 emissions". Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 50: 183–197. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.046. hdl: 1874/386161 . ISSN   0965-8564. S2CID   154332068.
  12. Creutzig, Felix; Niamir, Leila; Bai, Xuemei; Callaghan, Max; Cullen, Jonathan; Díaz-José, Julio; Figueroa, Maria; Grubler, Arnulf; Lamb, William F.; Leip, Adrian; Masanet, Eric; Mata, Érika; Mattauch, Linus; Minx, Jan C.; Mirasgedis, Sebastian; Mulugetta, Yacob; Nugroho, Sudarmanto Budi; Pathak, Minal; Perkins, Patricia; Roy, Joyashree; de la Rue du Can, Stephane; Saheb, Yamina; Some, Shreya; Steg, Linda; Steinberger, Julia; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana (January 2022). "Demand-side solutions to climate change mitigation consistent with high levels of well-being". Nature Climate Change. 12 (1): 36–46. Bibcode:2022NatCC..12...36C. doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01219-y . ISSN   1758-6798. S2CID   234275540.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Sharmina, M.; Edelenbosch, O. Y.; Wilson, C.; Freeman, R.; Gernaat, D. E. H. J.; Gilbert, P.; Larkin, A.; Littleton, E. W.; Traut, M.; van Vuuren, D. P.; Vaughan, N. E.; Wood, F. R.; Le Quéré, C. (21 April 2021). "Decarbonising the critical sectors of aviation, shipping, road freight and industry to limit warming to 1.5–2°C". Climate Policy. 21 (4): 455–474. Bibcode:2021CliPo..21..455S. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2020.1831430 . ISSN   1469-3062. S2CID   226330972.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Bergero, Candelaria; Gosnell, Greer; Gielen, Dolf; Kang, Seungwoo; Bazilian, Morgan; Davis, Steven J. (30 January 2023). "Pathways to net-zero emissions from aviation". Nature Sustainability. 6 (4): 404–414. Bibcode:2023NatSu...6..404B. doi: 10.1038/s41893-022-01046-9 . ISSN   2398-9629. S2CID   256449498.
  15. "Green flights not in easy reach, warn scientists". BBC News. 28 February 2023. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  16. "UK net zero aviation ambitions must resolve resource and research questions around alternatives to jet fuel | Royal Society". royalsociety.org. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Higham, James; Cohen, Scott A.; Cavaliere, Christina T.; Reis, Arianne; Finkler, Wiebke (16 January 2016). "Climate change, tourist air travel and radical emissions reduction". Journal of Cleaner Production. 111: 336–347. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.100. ISSN   0959-6526.
  18. Ivanova, Diana; Barrett, John; Wiedenhofer, Dominik; Macura, Biljana; Callaghan, Max; Creutzig, Felix (1 September 2020). "Quantifying the potential for climate change mitigation of consumption options". Environmental Research Letters . 15 (9): 093001. Bibcode:2020ERL....15i3001I. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8589 .
  19. 1 2 Lwasa, S.; Seto, K.C.; Bai, X.; Blanco, H.; et al. "Chapter 8: Urban systems and other settlements" (PDF). IPCC AR6 WG3 2022 . doi:10.1017/9781009157926.010.
  20. Moore, Frances C.; Lacasse, Katherine; Mach, Katharine J.; Shin, Yoon Ah; Gross, Louis J.; Beckage, Brian (March 2022). "Determinants of emissions pathways in the coupled climate–social system". Nature. 603 (7899): 103–111. Bibcode:2022Natur.603..103M. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04423-8 . ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   35173331. S2CID   246903111.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Gössling, Stefan; Dolnicar, Sara (January 2023). "A review of air travel behavior and climate change". WIREs Climate Change. 14 (1). Bibcode:2023WIRCC..14E.802G. doi: 10.1002/wcc.802 . ISSN   1757-7780. S2CID   251677425.
  22. Shabanpour, Ramin; Golshani, Nima; Tayarani, Mohammad; Auld, Joshua; Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros) (1 July 2018). "Analysis of telecommuting behavior and impacts on travel demand and the environment". Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 62: 563–576. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.003 . ISSN   1361-9209. S2CID   53687252.
  23. Wabl, Matthias; Jasper, Christopher (9 June 2020). "Airline bailouts point to greener travel—and higher fares". BNN Bloomberg . Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  24. Bakker, Stefan; Zuidgeest, Mark; de Coninck, Heleen; Huizenga, Cornie (4 May 2014). "Transport, Development and Climate Change Mitigation: Towards an Integrated Approach". Transport Reviews. 34 (3): 335–355. doi:10.1080/01441647.2014.903531. hdl: 2066/128021 . ISSN   0144-1647. S2CID   154749597.
  25. 1 2 Clewlow, Regina R.; Sussman, Joseph M.; Balakrishnan, Hamsa (1 May 2014). "The impact of high-speed rail and low-cost carriers on European air passenger traffic". Transport Policy. 33: 136–143. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.015. hdl: 1721.1/110725 . ISSN   0967-070X.
  26. Ma, Wenliang; Wang, Qiang; Yang, Hangjun; Zhang, Anming; Zhang, Yahua (1 May 2019). "Effects of Beijing-Shanghai high-speed rail on air travel: Passenger types, airline groups and tacit collusion". Research in Transportation Economics. 74: 64–76. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2018.12.002. ISSN   0739-8859. S2CID   158548055.
  27. 1 2 Bearne, Suzanne (18 January 2020). "Plane wrong: how your bosses should cut back on flights". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 February 2023.
  28. Park, Yonghwa; Ha, Hun-Koo (1 March 2006). "Analysis of the impact of high-speed railroad service on air transport demand". Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 42 (2): 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.003. ISSN   1366-5545.
  29. Judith Harmsen (6 March 2019). "Van Amsterdam naar Brussel vliegen blijft mogelijk". Trouw (in Dutch).
  30. Fusté-Forné, Francesc; Michael, Noela (2 January 2023). "Limited tourism: travel bubbles for a sustainable future" . Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 31 (1): 73–90. Bibcode:2023JSusT..31...73F. doi:10.1080/09669582.2021.1954654. ISSN   0966-9582. S2CID   237732224.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 Peeters, Paul M.; Eijgelaar, Eke (1 February 2014). "Tourism's climate mitigation dilemma: Flying between rich and poor countries". Tourism Management. 40: 15–26. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.05.001. ISSN   0261-5177.
  32. Sun, Ya-Yen; Lin, Pei-Chun; Higham, James (1 December 2020). "Managing tourism emissions through optimizing the tourism demand mix: Concept and analysis". Tourism Management. 81: 104161. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104161. ISSN   0261-5177. PMC   7274965 . PMID   32536740.
  33. Reay, David S (2004). "New Directions: Flying in the face of the climate change convention" (PDF). Atmospheric Environment. 38 (5): 793–794. Bibcode:2004AtmEn..38..793R. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.026 . Retrieved 2 May 2018.
  34. Le Quéré, C. et al. 2015. Towards a culture of low-carbon research for the 21st Century.
  35. Nudging Climate Scientists To Follow Their Own Advice On Flying . FiveThirtyEight. by Christie Aschwanden. 26 March 2015.
  36. 1 2 Tao, Yanqiu; Steckel, Debbie; Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír; You, Fengqi (16 December 2021). "Trend towards virtual and hybrid conferences may be an effective climate change mitigation strategy". Nature Communications. 12 (1): 7324. Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.7324T. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27251-2. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   8677730 . PMID   34916499.
  37. 1 2 "Analysis | Climate activists held the largest anti-airport protest in British history. Expect more worldwide". Washington Post. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  38. 1 2 3 Schäfer, Andreas W.; Waitz, Ian A. (1 July 2014). "Air transportation and the environment". Transport Policy. 34: 1–4. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.012. ISSN   0967-070X.
  39. 1 2 Girod, Bastien; van Vuuren, Detlef P.; Deetman, Sebastiaan (1 June 2012). "Global travel within the 2°C climate target". Energy Policy. 45: 152–166. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.008. hdl: 1874/386132 . ISSN   0301-4215.
  40. Larsson, Jörgen; Elofsson, Anna; Sterner, Thomas; Åkerman, Jonas (3 July 2019). "International and national climate policies for aviation: a review". Climate Policy. 19 (6): 787–799. Bibcode:2019CliPo..19..787L. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2018.1562871 . ISSN   1469-3062. S2CID   159433826.
  41. 1 2 3 Paddison, Laura. "How the rich are driving climate change". BBC. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
  42. 1 2 3 4 Guillen-Royo, Mònica (9 December 2022). "Flying less, mobility practices, and well-being: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway". Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy. 18 (1): 278–291. Bibcode:2022SSPP...18..278G. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2022.2043682 . S2CID   247513733.
  43. 1 2 Sparkman, Gregg; Hackel, Leor. "Does Climate Change Mean You Should Fly Less? Yeah, Maybe". Wired. Retrieved 28 February 2023.
  44. "AirportWatch | About AirportWatch – Our Aims and Objectives". www.airportwatch.org.uk. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  45. 1 2 Limb, Lottie (14 February 2023). "Ban private jets, say scientists blocking airports around the world". euronews. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  46. Santos, Eraldo Souza dos (2 November 2021). "The Anti-Airport Movement Has Gone Global". World Politics Review. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  47. "'Bull**** flights': How to have a debate on legitimate air traffic". euronews. 22 January 2022. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  48. "Position Paper". Stay Grounded. Retrieved 3 March 2023.
  49. Haines, Gavin (31 May 2019). "Is Sweden's 'flight shame' movement dampening demand for air travel?". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 1 June 2019 via www.telegraph.co.uk.
  50. Kerry Reals (6 Sep 2019). "'Flight shaming' is changing the face of travel". Flightglobal.
  51. "'Flight shame' a factor in Swedish traffic decline". Flightglobal. 10 January 2020.
  52. 1 2 3 Raux, Charles; Croissant, Yves; Pons, Damien (1 March 2015). "Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax?". Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 35: 72–83. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.008. ISSN   1361-9209.
  53. Fawcett, Tina; Parag, Yael (January 2010). "An introduction to personal carbon trading". Climate Policy. 10 (4): 329–338. Bibcode:2010CliPo..10..329F. doi:10.3763/cpol.2010.0649. S2CID   153869459.
  54. Fawcett, Tina (1 June 2012). "Personal carbon trading: is now the right time?". Carbon Management. 3 (3): 283–291. Bibcode:2012CarM....3..283F. doi: 10.4155/cmt.12.19 . ISSN   1758-3004. S2CID   153682380.
  55. Bothner, Fabio (January 2021). "Personal Carbon Trading—Lost in the Policy Primeval Soup?". Sustainability. 13 (8): 4592. doi: 10.3390/su13084592 . ISSN   2071-1050.
  56. Sodha, Sonia (9 May 2018). "A radical way to cut emissions – ration everyone's flights". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
  57. "Analysis | We Need Cap-and-Trade For Individuals As Well As Companies". Washington Post. Retrieved 21 September 2021.
  58. "Pandemic and digitalization set stage for revival of a cast-off idea: Personal carbon allowances". KTH Royal Institute of Technology via phys.org.
  59. Fuso Nerini, Francesco; Fawcett, Tina; Parag, Yael; Ekins, Paul (16 August 2021). "Personal carbon allowances revisited". Nature Sustainability. 4 (12): 1025–1031. Bibcode:2021NatSu...4.1025F. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00756-w . ISSN   2398-9629.
  60. "A Persuasive Climate - Personal Trading and Changing Lifestyles | TABLE Debates". tabledebates.org. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
  61. 1 2 Hickel, Jason; Brockway, Paul; Kallis, Giorgos; Keyßer, Lorenz; Lenzen, Manfred; Slameršak, Aljoša; Steinberger, Julia; Ürge-Vorsatz, Diana (August 2021). "Urgent need for post-growth climate mitigation scenarios" (PDF). Nature Energy. 6 (8): 766–768. Bibcode:2021NatEn...6..766H. doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00884-9. ISSN   2058-7546. S2CID   238826208.
  62. Klöwer, Milan (5 November 2021). "Reducing air travel by small amounts each year could level off the climate impact". The Conversation.
  63. "Telepresence". Project Drawdown. 6 February 2020.
  64. Stoll, Christian; Mehling, Michael Arthur (23 October 2020). "COVID-19: Clinching the Climate Opportunity". One Earth. 3 (4): 400–404. Bibcode:2020OEart...3..400S. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.003. ISSN   2590-3330. PMC   7508545 . PMID   34173539.
  65. 1 2 3 Fragkos, Panagiotis (January 2022). "Decarbonizing the International Shipping and Aviation Sectors". Energies. 15 (24): 9650. doi: 10.3390/en15249650 . ISSN   1996-1073.
  66. Briancon, Pierre (25 August 2022). "Breakingviews - Private jet crackdown is idea that could fly". Reuters. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
  67. 1 2 Büchs, Milena; Mattioli, Giulio (12 September 2022). "How socially just are taxes on air travel and 'frequent flyer levies'?". Journal of Sustainable Tourism: 1–23. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2022.2115050 . ISSN   0966-9582. S2CID   252273990.
  68. Laville, Sandra (20 October 2021). "UK meat tax and frequent-flyer levy proposals briefly published then deleted". The Guardian. Retrieved 16 May 2023.
  69. "Aviation climate finance using a global frequent flying levy". International Council on Clean Transportation. Retrieved 16 May 2023.
  70. 1 2 3 4 5 Gössling, Stefan; Humpe, Andreas (1 November 2020). "The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change". Global Environmental Change. 65: 102194. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194. ISSN   0959-3780. PMC   9900393 . PMID   36777089.
  71. Gössling, Stefan; Humpe, Andreas (1 June 2023). "Millionaire spending incompatible with 1.5 °C ambitions". Cleaner Production Letters. 4: 100027. doi: 10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100027 . ISSN   2666-7916. S2CID   254959383.
  72. Timperley, Jocelyn (19 February 2020). "Should we give up flying for the sake of the climate?". BBC.
  73. Stefan Gössling (November 2020). "The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change". Global Environmental Change . 65: 102194. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102194. PMC   9900393 . PMID   36777089. S2CID   228984718.
  74. "2021–2022 EIB Climate Survey, part 2 of 3: Shopping for a new car? Most Europeans say they will opt for hybrid or electric". European Investment Bank. 22 March 2022.

Further reading