Australian Senate committees

Last updated

The committees of the Australian Senate are committees of Senators, established by the Australian Senate, for purposes determined by that body. Senate committees are part of the operation of the Australian parliament, and have for some decades been involved in maintenance of government accountability to the Australian parliament, particularly through hearings to scrutinise the budget, and through public inquiries on policy questions.

Contents

History of the committees

A short video on Australian Parliamentary Committees

The existence of parliamentary committees is mentioned in section 49 of the Constitution of Australia, which makes reference to 'The powers, privileges, and immunities of the Senate and of the House of Representatives, and of the members and the committees of each House...' However, the Senate had few committees, engaged in limited activities, until 1970. [1] A number of domestic committees had operated since the establishment of the parliament, but prior to 1970 the only significant committee to be established was the Regulations and Ordinances Committee in 1932, one of the legislative scrutiny committees (see below).

In 1970, the present committee system was created, with a series of standing (permanent) committees established that mirrored the portfolio activities of government. [1] These reforms significantly enhanced the expertise and power of the Senate:

The Senate is now undergoing the most fundamental and dramatic changes witnessed in the Commonwealth Parliament since the States decided to federate 70 years ago. The introduction of a wide-ranging committee system will make the red-carpeted Upper House potentially the most powerful parliamentary chamber in Australia. [2]

These reforms were also significant in that they gave to Senate committees the role of examining the budget (what is referred to as the estimates process or estimates hearings), which had hitherto been confined to the Senate and its committee of the whole. The role of the committees was enhanced by three subsequent developments. First, in 1982 the Scrutiny of Bills Committee was established, which, in examining all bills, played a role that complemented that of the examination of all delegated legislation by the Regulations and Ordinances Committee. Second, in 1989 the Senate adopted procedures for the systematic referral of bills to committees, increasing the level of legislative scrutiny taking place within parliament. [3] Third, in 1993, the committees adopted a more extensive procedure for consideration of the budget, creating a second opportunity each year for Senators to follow up issues identified during the initial budget estimates hearings. These second hearings are referred to as supplementary budget estimates. Though the committee system was restructured in 1994, 2006 and again in 2009, the range of functions has remained essentially the same.

Purposes of committees

The functions of committees depend on the type of committee and on the work it is undertaking. Most of the committees are established under the Senate's Standing Orders.

Standing committees

The Legislative and General Purpose Standing Committees (often referred to simply as 'standing committees') are established by Standing Order 25. [4] The standing committees are actually made up of pairs of committees – a legislation committee and a references committee. The legislation committees are responsible for scrutinising bills referred to them by the chamber; examining the government's budget and activities (in what is called the budget estimates process); [5] and for examining departmental annual reports and activities. The references committees are responsible for conducting inquiries into topics referred to them by the chamber. [6]

Select committees

Select committees are temporary committees, established by the Senate to deal with particular issues. This may occur when a particular group of Senators wishes to examine an issue in depth, or where there is no existing committee suited to addressing a particular topic. Australian Senate select committees have included ones set up to examine the Administration of Indigenous Affairs[ dead link ], and Mental Health[ dead link ]. Select committees usually cease to exist upon reporting back to the chamber. One exception to this was the Senate Select Committee on Superannuation[ dead link ] which in various forms existed for a decade. [7]

Domestic committees

Domestic committees are responsible for administering aspects of the Senate's own affairs. The selection of bills committee meets each sitting fortnight to consider which of the bills coming before the Senate will be referred to committees for detailed consideration. The procedure committee considers "any matter relating to the procedures of the Senate referred to it by the Senate or by the President". [8] This committee thus regularly examines and reports back to the chamber on suggested changes to the operation of the Senate and its committees, such as what times of day the chamber will sit and what rules should govern its order of business.

Established by Standing Order 18 of the Senate, the privileges committee is responsible for reporting on matters of parliamentary privilege referred to it by the Senate. [9] The protections afforded by parliamentary privilege are essential to parliament and its committees to be able to operate effectively. [10] The bulk of the work of the privileges committee's work is associated with facilitating a 'right of reply' for people adversely named in the Senate, as well as involving investigations of unauthorised disclosures of Senate committee proceedings, [11] complaints from witnesses in connection with evidence given to committees, and allegedly misleading evidence given to committees. [12]

Legislative scrutiny committees

The purpose of the scrutiny of bills committee is to assess "legislative proposals against a set of accountability standards that focus on the effect of proposed legislation on individual rights, liberties and obligations, and on parliamentary propriety". [13] The Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Delegated Legislation performs a similar task, but for all subordinate legislation.

Other committees

Senators may be members of joint committees: committees jointly established by both chambers of the Australian parliament. An example of this is the Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia, appointed by resolution by the House of Representatives on 4 July 2019 and the Senate on 22 July 2019. [14] The inquiry into the destruction of 46,000-year-old caves at the Juukan Gorge in the Pilbara region of Western Australia was referred to this Committee in June 2020. [15]

Political parties will often have caucus committees comprising members of the parliamentary party; these committees will often have a policy focus, but are not committees of the parliament and are not bound by any of parliament's rules of procedures.

List of committees

A Senate committee room in Parliament House, Canberra AustralianSenateCommitteeRm.JPG
A Senate committee room in Parliament House, Canberra
a public Senate Committee hearing into the Roe 8 environmental compliance held in Perth 23 March 2017 Senate 230217 gnangarra-124.JPG
a public Senate Committee hearing into the Roe 8 environmental compliance held in Perth 23 March 2017

These are the committees of the 47th Parliament that exist within each category: [16]

CommitteeChairDeputy Chair
Standing committees
Community Affairs
Legislation Marielle Smith (SA) Janet Rice (VIC)
ReferencesJanet Rice (VIC)Marielle Smith (SA)
Economics
Legislation Jess Walsh (VIC) Andrew Bragg (NSW)
ReferencesAndrew Bragg (NSW)Jess Walsh (VIC)
Education and Employment
Legislation Tony Sheldon (NSW) Matt O'Sullivan (WA)
ReferencesMatt O'Sullivan (WA)Tony Sheldon (NSW)
Environment and Communications
Legislation Karen Grogan (SA) Sarah Hanson-Young (SA)
ReferencesSarah Hanson-Young (SA)Karen Grogan (SA)
Finance and Public Administration
Legislation Louise Pratt (WA) Richard Colbeck (TAS)
ReferencesRichard Colbeck (TAS)Louise Pratt (WA)
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade
Legislation Raff Ciccone (VIC) Claire Chandler (TAS)
ReferencesClaire Chandler (TAS)Raff Ciccone (VIC)
Legal and Constitutional Affairs
Legislation Nita Green (QLD) Paul Scarr (QLD)
ReferencesPaul Scarr (QLD)Nita Green (QLD)
Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport
Legislation Glenn Sterle (WA) Matthew Canavan (QLD)
ReferencesMatthew Canavan (QLD)Glenn Sterle (WA)
Select committees
Australia’s Disaster Resilience Jacqui Lambie (TAS) Tony Sheldon (NSW)
Final Report due 8 August 2024
Cost of Living Jane Hume (VIC) Penny Allman-Payne (QLD)
Final Report due 31 May 2024
Perth Mint and Commonwealth regulatory compliance Dean Smith (WA) Dorinda Cox (WA)
Final Report due 28 March 2024
Supermarket Prices Nick McKim (TAS) Glenn Sterle (WA)
Final Report due 7 May 2024
Domestic committees
Appropriations, Staffing and Security Sue Lines (WA) Andrew McLachlan (SA)
Privileges Slade Brockman (WA) Deborah O'Neill (NSW)
Procedure Andrew McLachlan (SA)
Publications Fatima Payman (WA) Wendy Askew (TAS)
Selection of Bills Anne Urquhart (TAS)
Senators' Interests Linda Reynolds (WA)
Legislative scrutiny committees
Scrutiny of Bills Dean Smith (WA) Raff Ciccone (VIC)
Scrutiny of Delegated LegislationVacant Linda Reynolds (WA)
Joint Statutory Committees
Broadcasting of Parliamentary Proceedings Milton Dick MPSenator Sue Lines
Corporations and Financial ServicesSenator Deborah O'Neill Alex Hawke MP
Intelligence and Security Peter Khalil MP Andrew Wallace MP
Law EnforcementSenator Helen Polley Llew O'Brien MP
Human Rights Josh Burns MP Henry Pike MP
Public Accounts and Audit Julian Hill MPSenator Linda Reynolds
Public Works Graham Perrett MP Keith Pitt MP
Joint Standing Committees
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander AffairsSenator Jana Stewart Melissa Price MP
Electoral Matters Kate Thwaites MPSenator James McGrath
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Shayne Neumann MPSenator David Fawcett
Implementation of the National Redress SchemeSenator Catryna Bilyk Senator Dean Smith
Migration Maria Vamvakinou MP Anne Webster MP
National Anti-Corruption CommissionSenator Karen Grogan Helen Haines MP
National Capital and External Territories Alicia Payne MP Nola Marino MP
National Disability Insurance Scheme Libby Coker MPSenator Hollie Hughes
Northern Australia Marion Scrymgour MP Warren Entsch MP
Parliamentary LibrarySenator Slade Brockman Anne Stanley MP
Publications Fiona Phillips MPSenator Fatima Payman
Trade and Investment Growth Steve Georganas MP Scott Buchholz MP
Treaties Josh Wilson MP Phillip Thompson MP

Membership and rules of committees

The Senate's committees are formed at the commencement of each new parliament, in accordance with rules set out in the Standing Orders. The committees exist until the first day of the following parliament, in contrast to the lower house committees, which cease to exist as soon as parliament is prorogued for an election.

The most important and high profile of the committees are the pairs of standing committees. These each have six members. The chairman of each legislation committee is chosen from amongst the government members, the deputy chair from amongst non-government members. The reverse is the case for the references committees. Because the chair has a casting vote in the event of a committee vote being tied, the government effectively controls the legislation committees, while the non-government parties control the references committees. [17]

The membership and rules of committees, including those that operated during the Coalition's period of control, are shown below: [18]

Feature of committeesCurrent (and before September 2006)Between September 2006 and May 2009
Structure of committeesEight pairs of committees with overlapping but distinct membership:
  • Legislation committees examined bills, budget estimates and annual reports
  • References committees examined references made by Senate
Eight Legislation and General Purpose Standing committees performing all functions of both Legislation and References committees
Scope of each committeeVaries: between 1 and 3 government portfolios
Number of membersSixEight
CompositionLegislation committees:
  • 3 government 2 opposition 1 minor party

References committees:

  • 3 opposition 2 government 1 minor party
All Legislation and General Purpose Standing committees:
  • 4 government 3 opposition 1 minor party
ChairingLegislation committees:
  • government chair

References committees:

  • opposition chair (six committees)
  • minor party chair (two committees)
All chaired by government members
VotingChair has a casting vote if votes tied
Effective controlLegislation committees:
  • government parties

References committees:

  • non-government parties
Government parties
Quorum1 government, 1 opposition OR
Majority of members

Committees have two types of members: full members and participating members. In the case of standing committees, full members are the six outlined above. In addition, however, any Senator may arrange for the Senate to agree to their being made a participating member of the committee. This gives them the same rights as full members, with the important exception of being unable to vote on motions in private meetings of the committees.

The committees are governed by the Standing Orders of the Senate, as well as being able to pass their own resolutions to govern certain aspects of their operations (such as the processing of correspondence and submissions to inquiries).

Committees are designed to assist the Senate as a whole. Thus the main formal structure of their work is that the Senate refers something to a committee for examination, and the committee reports back to the Senate on that matter. These reports are tabled during parliamentary sittings, but can also be presented when the Senate is not in session. [19] Committees can gather evidence and will often hold public hearings to assist this process. [20] To gather their evidence committees can (with exceptions) travel from place to place to hear evidence. [21] Committees are able to order the production of documents and the appearance of witnesses (powers that are in practice used very sparingly). [22] [23] Most evidence taken by committees (both written submissions and transcripts of public hearings) is published, however committees have the power to take evidence confidentially ( in camera ), and regularly do so. [24] Committees hold both public hearings and conduct business at private meetings. The minutes of private meetings are confidential (in contrast, for example, to those of New South Wales parliamentary committees). [25]

The rules governing committees are slightly different when conducting budget estimates hearings. [26] In particular, during estimates hearings,

The work of Senate committees

A typical year in the life of a Senate legislation committee will see it conduct eight days of hearings around budget estimates, in three sessions: February (additional estimates), May/June (the main budget estimates) and October/November (supplementary budget estimates). In addition, it will typically conduct several inquiries into pieces of legislation being considered by the parliament. A references committee will conduct inquiries into policy issues referred to it by the Senate. Each of these inquiries will usually result in a report tabled in the Senate (there may be exceptions if an election intervenes during the committee's deliberations). A consolidated list of the reports[ dead link ] prepared by all Senate committees since 1970 is published by the Department of the Senate.

A Senate committee hearing, showing witness (left), transcription and broadcasting staff (back) and Senators (right) Australian Senate committee hearing 2008.JPG
A Senate committee hearing, showing witness (left), transcription and broadcasting staff (back) and Senators (right)

Inquiries into topics and bills

Committee inquiries typically begin with the reference of an issue or a proposed law to the committee for inquiry and report back to the Senate. [27] The committee will make a call for submissions, seeking public input on the matter referred to the committee. It will often publish those submissions to help inform stakeholders of the views that are being put to the committee. [28] A committee will often hold one or more public hearings, at which committee members ask questions of key stakeholders interested in the issue under inquiry. These hearings may be held anywhere in Australia, are often broadcast, and result in a published transcript (Hansard) that records the evidence taken. The opportunity to make submissions, and the greater accessibility of the committees compared to parliament itself, can provide disadvantaged individuals and organisations valued opportunities to engage in democratic processes. [29] Committees also frequently ask relevant government agencies to respond to issues raised by submissions or evidence given to the inquiry. Once evidence has been gathered there usually follows a period of research and analysis by the committee. It will then deliver a report to the Senate, which will generally include recommendations. The Commonwealth government is then expected to table a response to the report, stating responses to any recommendations the committee may have made. [30]

Scrutiny of the budget

Following the introduction of appropriation bills into the Parliament, the expenditure proposed in those bills is referred to Senate legislation committees for inquiry. [1] Such referrals result in what are generally known as budget estimates hearings. Senate standing committees will usually conduct eight days of hearings around budget estimates, in three sessions: February (additional estimates), May/June (the main budget estimates) and October/November (supplementary budget estimates).

During these hearings ministers, assisted by senior public servants, answer questions put to them by any Senator that relate to the operations and expenditure of departments and agencies that receive federal government funding. [31] In such hearings, ministers from the House of Representatives are represented by a minister who is also a Senator.

Budget and management reforms in the 1980s and 1990s saw a change in budgeting, including a greater emphasis on outcomes, and decreasing emphasis on inputs. This has been reflected in the activities of Senate committees, with Senators' questions being increasingly focussed on the 'results of government activities and away from a concern with inputs'. [32]

Impact

The impact of the Senate's committees varies and has been the subject of debate. The work of the committees is frequently more consensual and less partisan than activity in the parliamentary chambers, and unanimous committee reports that agree recommendations across party lines are not uncommon. [33] As a result, these recommendations may contribute to subsequent government policy announcements and occasionally to changes in government actions. The work of the regulations and ordinances committee has led to revisions of subordinate legislation in significant respects. [34] Committee scrutiny of bills has contributed to them being amended [35] or withdrawn. [36] The impact of committees on legislation overall has however been described as 'rather limited', [37] particularly as the committees that review bills are controlled by a government majority.

Senate committees can be affected by the party composition of the Senate. The Clerk of the Senate, Harry Evans, argued that a government majority of seats in the Senate resulted in limitations on what the committees inquired into, and how readily governments responded to their queries and requests for information. [38] Statistics published by centrist political party the Australian Democrats have been used to support the contention that committee operations have been inhibited by government control of the Senate, particularly in respect of selection of topics for committee inquiry. [39] However Senator Minchin, the leader of the government in the Senate in the mid-2000s, pointed out that their political rivals had previously cut off debate on more bills in the Senate than had his government. [40]

Prominent inquiries

One of the most high-profile Senate committee inquiries was the Senate Select Committee on a Certain Maritime Incident, which in 2002 investigated what became known as the Children Overboard Affair. The events and subsequent Senate committee inquiries were widely reported, [41] and the transcripts of the inquiry formed the basis of a play, A Certain Maritime Incident. [42] Other high-profile inquiries included the Community Affairs committee's inquiry into Children in Institutional Care[ dead link ], which brought to wide public notice the experiences of children who had been placed in care in sometimes inhumane circumstances and was directly responsible for state governments and churches making public apologies to the victims of abuse or neglect; [43] [44] the Select Committee on Mental Health[ dead link ], which contributed to widespread discussion of mental health issues and to a major funding boost for services in 2006; [45] and the 2006 inquiry into the Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill, [46] which contributed to a government decision not to proceed with controversial migration legislation.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian House of Representatives</span> Lower house of the Parliament of Australia

The House of Representatives is the lower house of the bicameral Parliament of Australia, the upper house being the Senate. Its composition and powers are set down in Chapter I of the Constitution of Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">House of Commons of Canada</span> Lower house of the Canadian Parliament

The House of Commons of Canada is the lower house of the Parliament of Canada. Together with the Crown and the Senate of Canada, they comprise the bicameral legislature of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament of Canada</span> Canadian federal legislature

The Parliament of Canada is the federal legislature of Canada, seated at Parliament Hill in Ottawa, and is composed of three parts: the King, the Senate, and the House of Commons. By constitutional convention, the House of Commons is dominant, with the Senate rarely opposing its will. The Senate reviews legislation from a less partisan standpoint and may initiate certain bills. The monarch or his representative, normally the governor general, provides royal assent to make bills into law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate of Canada</span> Upper house of the Parliament of Canada

The Senate of Canada is the upper house of the Parliament of Canada. Together with the Crown and the House of Commons, they compose the bicameral legislature of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Filibuster</span> Political stalling tactic

A filibuster is a political procedure in which one or more members of a legislative body prolong debate on proposed legislation so as to delay or entirely prevent a decision. It is sometimes referred to as "talking a bill to death" or "talking out a bill", and is characterized as a form of obstruction in a legislature or other decision-making body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian Senate</span> Upper house of the Parliament of Australia

The Senate is the upper house of the bicameral Parliament of Australia, the lower house being the House of Representatives. The composition and powers of the Senate are established in Chapter I of the Constitution of Australia. There are a total of 76 senators: 12 are elected from each of the six Australian states regardless of population and 2 from each of the two self-governing internal Australian territories. Senators are popularly elected under the single transferable vote system of proportional representation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament of Australia</span> Legislative branch of Australian government

The Parliament of Australia is the legislative body of the Commonwealth of Australia. It consists of three elements: the monarch, the Senate and the House of Representatives. The combination of two elected chambers, in which the members of the Senate represent the states and territories while the members of the House represent electoral divisions according to population, is modelled on the United States Congress. Through both chambers, however, there is a fused executive, drawn from the Westminster system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament of Malaysia</span> National bicameral legislature of Malaysia

The Parliament of Malaysia is the national legislature of Malaysia, based on the Westminster system. The bicameral parliament consists of the Dewan Rakyat and the Dewan Negara. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King), as the head of state, is the third component of Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Select committee (United Kingdom)</span> Parliamentary committee in the UK

In British politics, parliamentary select committees can be appointed from the House of Commons, like the Foreign Affairs Select Committee; from the House of Lords, like the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee; or as a joint committee of Parliament drawn from both, such as the Joint Committee on Human Rights. Committees may exist as "sessional" committees – i.e. be near-permanent – or as "ad-hoc" committees with a specific deadline by which to complete their work, after which they cease to exist, such as the Lords Committee on Public Service and Demographic Change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill Heffernan</span> Australian politician

William Daniel Heffernan, is an Australian former politician who was a Liberal Party member of the Senate representing the state of New South Wales from September 1996 to May 2016.

The Royal Commission into the Building and Construction Industry, or informally the Cole Royal Commission, was a Royal Commission established by the Australian government to inquire into and report upon alleged misconduct in the building and construction industry in Australia. The establishment of the Commission followed various unsuccessful attempts by the Federal Government to impose greater regulation upon the conduct of industrial relations in that industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WorkChoices</span> Australian industrial relations law

WorkChoices was the name given to changes made to the federal industrial relations laws in Australia by the Howard government in 2005, being amendments to the Workplace Relations Act 1996 by the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, sometimes referred to as the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, that came into effect on 27 March 2006.

The Standing Rules of the Senate are the parliamentary procedures adopted by the United States Senate that govern its procedure. The Senate's power to establish rules derives from Article One, Section 5 of the United States Constitution: "Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings ..."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate of Kazakhstan</span> Upper house in the Parliament of Kazakhstan

The Senate of Kazakhstan is the upper house of two chambers in Kazakhstan's legislature, known as the Parliament (Parlamenti). The Senate is composed of elected members: two from each region and two from three municipalities which are Almaty, Astana, and Shymkent.

Parliamentary committees of the Australian House of Representatives are groups of Members of Parliament, appointed by the House of Representatives, to undertake certain specified tasks. They comprise government and non-government Members and have considerable powers to undertake work on behalf of the Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harry Evans (Australian Senate clerk)</span> Australian Senate clerk

Harry Evans was the longest-serving Clerk of the Australian Senate, serving from 17 February 1988 to 4 December 2009. He was considered an "ardent and outspoken defender" of the independence and constitutional authority of the Senate.

R v McManus and Harvey is a landmark Australian court case for freedom of the press, whistleblowers and reporters privilege that resulted in journalists gaining greater safeguards to protect their sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Wells (politician)</span> Canadian politician

David Mark Wells, ICD.D is a Canadian senator from Newfoundland and Labrador. He was appointed to the Senate on January 25, 2013 by Governor General David Johnston on the advice of Canada's 22nd prime minister, Stephen Harper. He is the former Chair of the Subcommittee on the Senate Estimates and the Senate’s Standing Committee on Audit and Oversight. Senator Wells is a strong proponent of accountability and transparency in the Senate.

The National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians is a body composed of members of the House of Commons and Senate which reviews the activities of the Government of Canada's national security and intelligence agencies. The committee also performs strategic and systematic reviews of the legislative, regulatory, policy, expenditure and administrative frameworks under which national security activities are conducted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921</span> Repealed UK statute that made provision for certain Tribunals of Inquiry

The Tribunals of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921 was an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom, now repealed, which set out the powers and functions of certain Tribunals of Inquiry along with the procedures for the taking of evidence. The Act did not give blanket powers for a tribunal of inquiry to be set up ad hoc. For a tribunal to be established under the Act, the matter in question would need to be one of urgent public significance; and would need to be authorised by the Secretary of State. If these prerequisites were met, such an inquiry would be established with judicial powers—in the same way as the High Court or the Court of Session in Scotland.

References

  1. 1 2 3 J.R. Odgers, Australian Senate Practice (11th edn), Department of the Senate, Canberra, Chapter 16.
  2. Sydney Morning Herald, 3 November 1970
  3. Vander Wyk, J. and Lilley, A., (2005), 'Reference of Bills to Australian Senate Committees', Papers on Parliament, no. 43, Department of the Senate, Canberra
  4. Senate Standing Order 25, retrieved September 2007 Archived 29 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  5. Department of the Senate, 'Consideration of Estimates by the Senate's Legislation Committees', Senate Brief number 5, February 2005 Archived 30 June 2006 at the Wayback Machine
  6. From 2006 to 2009 these pairs of committees were integrated into one committee. Details are provided elsewhere in the article.
  7. Department of the Senate, A Light of Reason: The Work of the Senate Select Committee on Superannuation, Papers on Parliament No. 45, Department of the Senate, August 2006 Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  8. Senate Standing Order 17, retrieved September 2007. Archived 29 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  9. Department of the Senate, Senate Standing Committee of Privileges, retrieved September 2007 Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  10. Department of the Senate, 'Parliamentary Privilege', Senate Brief No 11, September 2006, retrieved September 2007. Archived 3 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  11. Committee of Privileges Parliamentary privilege — unauthorised disclosure of committee proceedings, 122nd Report, 2005, retrieved September 2007. Archived 13 July 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  12. Committee of Privileges, Parliamentary Privilege Precedents, Procedures and Practice in the Australian Senate 1966–2002, 107th Report, 2002, retrieved September 2007. Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  13. Australian Parliament website, Scrutiny of bills committee http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/scrutiny/cominfo.htm
  14. "Joint Standing Committee on Northern Australia". Parliament of Australia. 18 June 2020. Retrieved 24 August 2020.
  15. "Inquiry into the destruction of 46,000 year old caves at the Juukan Gorge in the Pilbara region of Western Australia". Parliament of Australia. 18 June 2020. Archived from the original on 25 August 2020. Retrieved 24 August 2020.
  16. "Senate and other Senate-based Committees". Department of the Senate. 2024. Retrieved 7 March 2024.
  17. This system has operated since 1994, with a brief hiatus from September 2006 to May 2009. During that period, reforms were implemented that were intended to streamline committee operations, and which reflected the fact that the government secured a majority of seats in the chamber at the 2004 election. See:
  18. See Odgers' Australian Senate Practice, 11th edition, Department of the Senate, Canberra, 2004 and the standing orders from before the 2006 reforms and after the reforms Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  19. Senate Standing Order 38, retrieved September 2007 Archived 29 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  20. Senate Standing Orders 35 and 36, retrieved September 2007 Archived 29 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  21. The following committees are empowered to travel for meetings: privileges committee (Standing Order 18); appropriations and staffing (Standing Order 19), scrutiny of bills (Standing Order 24), legislative and general purpose (Standing Order 25)
  22. Senate Standing Order 34, retrieved April 2015
  23. Department of the Senate, 'Rights and Responsibilities of Witnesses before Senate Committees', Senate Brief No 13, February 2013, retrieved April 2015
  24. Senate Standing Order 37, retrieved September 2007 Archived 29 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  25. New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Standing Orders, 21 November 2006, SO 303
  26. Department of the Senate, ' Consideration of Estimates by the Senate Committees', Senate Brief No 5, September 2006, retrieved September 2007 Archived 3 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  27. Department of the Senate, 'Senate Committees', Senate Brief No 4, September 2006, retrieved September 2007 Archived 26 October 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  28. Ian Holland, 'Parliamentary committees as an arena for policy work', in Colebatch, H. (ed.), Beyond the Policy Cycle: The Policy Process in Australia, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 2006, pp 80–81
  29. Kathleen Dermody, Ian Holland, and Elton Humphery, 'Parliamentary Committees and Neglected Voices in Society', The Table, vol. 74, 2006
  30. Resolution of the Senate 14 March 1973, retrieved September 2007 Archived 9 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  31. Vander Wyk, J., (2006), The Senate – Guide to Committee Procedure and Practice, Senate Committee Office, Canberra, chapter 14.
  32. Richard Mulgan, 'The accountability priorities of Australian parliamentarians', Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 67, no. 4, 2008, pp 457–469.
  33. Stanley Bach, Platypus and Parliament: The Australian Senate in Theory and Practice, Department of the Senate, Canberra, 2003, pp 190–191
  34. Rodney Smith, 'Parliament', in Judith Brett, James Gillespie and Murray Goot (eds), Developments in Australian Politics, Macmillan, Melbourne, 1994, pp 126–129
  35. ABC News, Senate committee urges changes to proposed media laws, 6 October 2006, retrieved September 2007
  36. ABC News, 'Calls mount for Govt to drop migration bill', 14 June 2006, retrieved September 2007 Archived 9 April 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  37. Graham Maddox, Australian Democracy in Theory and Practice (3rd edition), Longman, Melbourne, 1996, p. 233
  38. Evans, H. "The government majority in the Senate: A nail in the coffin of responsible government?", address to Victorian Chapter of the Australasian Study of Parliament Group, 3 October 2006 Archived 5 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  39. Australian Democrats, Senate Watch, retrieved September 2007. Archived 22 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  40. Senator Nick Minchin, 'Senate majority used responsibly', media release, 26 June 2007, retrieved September 2007.
  41. See for example David Marr and Marian Wilkinson, Dark Victory, Allen & Unwin, 2003.
  42. Tanya Nolan, 'A Certain Maritime Incident: Pure Theatre', ABC Radio, The World Today, 26 March 2004
  43. Anglican Church Diocese of Sydney, Response to Care Leavers Archived 2 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine , 25 October 2005, retrieved September 2007
  44. The Minister for Children, Sherryl Garbutt, 'Victoria to apologise to former children in state care', Media Release 27 July 2006, retrieved September 2007 Archived 7 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  45. The Hon. Tony Abbott, 'Commonwealth commitment to mental health services', Media release, 5 April 2006, retrieved September 2007.
  46. Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee, 'Provisions of the Migration Amendment (Designated Unauthorised Arrivals) Bill 2006 Report', June 2006, retrieved September 2007. Archived 22 November 2008 at the Wayback Machine

Further reading