Bertram Gawronski

Last updated
Bertram Gawronski
Born (1971-10-22) October 22, 1971 (age 51)
Würzburg, Germany
Alma mater
Known forAssociative-Propositional Evaluation Model, CNI Model of Moral Decision-Making
Scientific career
Fields Psychology (social)
Institutions

Bertram Gawronski is a social psychologist and professor of psychology at the University of Texas at Austin. [1] He is known for his research in the areas of attitudes, social cognition, decision making, and moral psychology.

Contents

Biography

Bertram Gawronski earned his MA in philosophy at the Free University of Berlin (Germany) in 1998 and his PhD in psychology at Humboldt University of Berlin (Germany) in 2001. From 2001 to 2002 Gawronski worked as a Postdoctoral Fellow with Fritz Strack at the University of Würzburg (Germany) and from 2002 to 2004 with Galen Bodenhausen at Northwestern University (US). In 2004, he accepted a position as assistant professor at the University of Western Ontario in London, Ontario (Canada), where he was awarded a Canada Research Chair in 2005. He was promoted to the rank of associate professor in 2008 and to the rank of professor in 2010. Since January 2014, he is professor of psychology at the University of Texas at Austin, where he held the David Wechsler Regents Chair in Psychology from 2015 to 2020. [2]

Research

Gawronski's research investigates the mental processes underlying social judgments and social behavior. A central focus of his research concerns the interplay of automatic and controlled processes in attitudes, social cognition, and decision making.

Gawronski's most influential work is the associative-propositional evaluation (APE) model (developed in collaboration with Galen Bodenhausen), a dual process theory that specifies the relation between explicit and implicit evaluations. A central assumption of the APE model is that spontaneous "implicit" evaluations and deliberate "explicit" evaluations are the product of two functionally distinct mental processes. Whereas implicit evaluations are assumed to be the outcome of associative processes, explicit evaluations are assumed to be the outcome of propositional processes. Associative processes are conceptualized as the activation of associations on the basis of feature similarity and spatio-temporal contiguity during learning. Propositional processes are defined as the validation of activated information on the basis of basic principles of cognitive consistency. The APE model has been instrumental in explaining diverging patterns of attitude change, including (a) changes in implicit but not explicit evaluations, (b) changes in explicit but not implicit evaluations, (c) corresponding changes in implicit and explicit evaluations, and (d) opposite changes in implicit and explicit evaluations. In 2011, the Council of Canadian Academies identified Gawronski and Bodenhausen's first article on the APE model as one of the 1% most frequently cited psychology papers worldwide published during the period of 2000–2008. Since its publication in 2006, this article has been cited more than 3000 times. [3]

In 2008, Gawronski's research received widespread attention in the popular media with a study that predicted future decisions of undecided voters by means of an implicit-association test (conducted in collaboration with Silvia Galdi and Luciano Arcuri at the University of Padova, Italy). [4] The findings fueled debates about whether people can make decisions outside of conscious awareness, questioning a central idea underlying theories of rational choice. In 2012, follow-up research by Gawronski and his colleagues qualified such a strong interpretation by showing that undecided individuals selectively search for information that is consistent with their implicit preferences, which in turn provides the basis for conscious decisions. [5]

Another influential line of research by Gawronski investigated the generalization versus contextualization of implicit evaluations (conducted in collaboration with Robert Rydell at Indiana University, US, Bram Vervliet at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, and Jan De Houwer Ghent University, Belgium). The research was inspired by inconsistent findings showing that implicit evaluations can be highly robust and difficult to change, highly malleable and easy to change, and highly context-dependent. To account for these disparate findings, Gawronski and his colleagues developed a learning theory that specifies the contextual conditions under which implicit evaluations reflect (a) initially learned attitudinal information, (b) subsequently learned counterattitudinal information, or (c) a mixture of both. Corresponding to similar patterns found in animal learning, the theory predicts that implicit evaluations tend to reflect the valence of counterattitudinal information only in the context in which this information was learned, and the valence of initial experiences in any other context. The findings received widespread attention for their implications on the stability of first impressions, suggesting that experiences that contradict a first impression are bound to the context in which they were made. [6] Gawronski's work on these questions has been recognized with the Daniel M. Wegner Theoretical Innovation Prize by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology [7] and the Best Social Cognition Paper Award by the International Social Cognition Network. [8]

In the area of moral psychology, Gawronski's research has made significant contributions to understanding the processes underlying responses in moral dilemmas that pit the consequences of a given action for the greater good (utilitarianism) against the consistency of the action with moral norms (deontology). A commonly used scenario in this research is the trolley problem, in which a runaway trolley is approaching a group of workers who would be killed unless the trolley is redirected to a different track where it would kill only one person instead of five. Whereas judgments favoring this action have been described as utilitarian because they maximize the greater good, judgments opposing this action have been described as deontological because they are consistent with the moral norm that one should not kill other people. Together with Paul Conway, Gawronski developed a process dissociation model to disentangle the independent contributions of utilitarian and deontological inclinations to moral dilemma judgments. [9] Expanding on this work, Gawronski and colleagues developed a multinomial model called the CNI model, which quantifies (a) sensitivity to consequences, (b) sensitivity to moral norms, and (c) general preference for inaction over action in responses to moral dilemmas. [10]

Honors and awards

Edited books

Representative publications

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive dissonance</span> Stress from contradictory beliefs

In the field of psychology, cognitive dissonance is the perception of contradictory information and the mental toll of it. Relevant items of information include a person's actions, feelings, ideas, beliefs, values, and things in the environment. Cognitive dissonance is typically experienced as psychological stress when persons participate in an action that goes against one or more of those things. According to this theory, when two actions or ideas are not psychologically consistent with each other, people do all in their power to change them until they become consistent. The discomfort is triggered by the person's belief clashing with new information perceived, wherein the individual tries to find a way to resolve the contradiction to reduce their discomfort.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Index of psychology articles</span>

Psychology is an academic and applied discipline involving the scientific study of human mental functions and behavior. Occasionally, in addition or opposition to employing the scientific method, it also relies on symbolic interpretation and critical analysis, although these traditions have tended to be less pronounced than in other social sciences, such as sociology. Psychologists study phenomena such as perception, cognition, emotion, personality, behavior, and interpersonal relationships. Some, especially depth psychologists, also study the unconscious mind.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Attitude (psychology)</span> Psychological construct, a mental and emotional entity that inheres in, or characterizes a person

In psychology, attitude is a psychological construct that is a mental and emotional entity that inheres or characterizes a person, their attitude to approach to something, or their personal view on it. Attitude involves their mindset, outlook and feelings. Attitudes are complex and are an acquired state through life experience. Attitude is an individual's predisposed state of mind regarding a value and it is precipitated through a responsive expression towards oneself, a person, place, thing, or event which in turn influences the individual's thought and action.

Moral reasoning is the study of how people think about right and wrong and how they acquire and apply moral rules. It is a subdiscipline of moral psychology that overlaps with moral philosophy, and is the foundation of descriptive ethics.

Moral psychology is a field of study in both philosophy and psychology. Historically, the term "moral psychology" was used relatively narrowly to refer to the study of moral development. Moral psychology eventually came to refer more broadly to various topics at the intersection of ethics, psychology, and philosophy of mind. Some of the main topics of the field are moral judgment, moral reasoning, moral sensitivity, moral responsibility, moral motivation, moral identity, moral action, moral development, moral diversity, moral character, altruism, psychological egoism, moral luck, moral forecasting, moral emotion, affective forecasting, and moral disagreement.

The implicit-association test (IAT) is an assessment intended to detect subconscious associations between mental representations of objects (concepts) in memory. Its best-known application is the assessment of implicit stereotypes held by test subjects, such as associations between particular racial categories and stereotypes about those groups. The test has been applied to a variety of belief associations, such as those involving racial groups, gender, sexuality, age, and religion but also the self-esteem, political views, and predictions of the test taker. The implicit-association test is the subject of significant academic and popular debate regarding its validity, reliability, and usefulness in assessing implicit bias.

In psychology, a dual process theory provides an account of how thought can arise in two different ways, or as a result of two different processes. Often, the two processes consist of an implicit (automatic), unconscious process and an explicit (controlled), conscious process. Verbalized explicit processes or attitudes and actions may change with persuasion or education; though implicit process or attitudes usually take a long amount of time to change with the forming of new habits. Dual process theories can be found in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. It has also been linked with economics via prospect theory and behavioral economics, and increasingly in sociology through cultural analysis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mahzarin Banaji</span> Indian social psychologist (born 1959)

Mahzarin Rustum Banaji FBA is an American psychologist of Indian origin at Harvard University, known for her work popularizing the concept of implicit bias in regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, and other factors.

Implicit cognition refers to cognitive processes that occur outside conscious awareness or conscious control. This includes domains such as learning, perception, or memory which may influence a person's behavior without their conscious awareness of those influences.

Russell Fazio is Harold E. Burtt Professor of Social Psychology at Ohio State University, where he heads Russ's Attitude and Social Cognition Lab (RASCL). Fazio's work focuses on social psychological phenomena like attitude formation and change, the relationship between attitudes and behavior, and the automatic and controlled cognitive processes that guide social behavior.

Ron Sun is a cognitive scientist who made significant contributions to computational psychology and other areas of cognitive science and artificial intelligence. He is currently professor of cognitive sciences at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and formerly the James C. Dowell Professor of Engineering and Professor of Computer Science at University of Missouri. He received his Ph.D. in 1992 from Brandeis University.

Implicit self-esteem refers to a person's disposition to evaluate themselves in a spontaneous, automatic, or unconscious manner. It contrasts with explicit self-esteem, which entails more conscious and reflective self-evaluation. Both explicit and implicit self-esteem are constituents of self-esteem.

Implicit attitudes are evaluations that occur without conscious awareness towards an attitude object or the self. These evaluations are generally either favorable or unfavorable and come about from various influences in the individual experience. The commonly used definition of implicit attitude within cognitive and social psychology comes from Anthony Greenwald and Mahzarin Banaji's template for definitions of terms related to implicit cognition: "Implicit attitudes are introspectively unidentified traces of past experience that mediate favorable or unfavorable feeling, thought, or action toward social objects". These thoughts, feelings or actions have an influence on behavior that the individual may not be aware of.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Basic science (psychology)</span> Subdisciplines within psychology

Some of the research that is conducted in the field of psychology is more "fundamental" than the research conducted in the applied psychological disciplines, and does not necessarily have a direct application. The subdisciplines within psychology that can be thought to reflect a basic-science orientation include biological psychology, cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and so on. Research in these subdisciplines is characterized by methodological rigor. The concern of psychology as a basic science is in understanding the laws and processes that underlie behavior, cognition, and emotion. Psychology as a basic science provides a foundation for applied psychology. Applied psychology, by contrast, involves the application of psychological principles and theories yielded up by the basic psychological sciences; these applications are aimed at overcoming problems or promoting well-being in areas such as mental and physical health and education.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert S. Wyer</span>

Robert S. Wyer Jr. is a visiting professor at the University of Cincinnati and professor (emeritus) at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He received his doctoral degree from the University of Colorado. Wyer Jr.'s research interests cover various aspects of social information processing, including knowledge accessibility, comprehension, memory, social inference, the impact of affect on judgment and decisions, attitude formation and change, and consumer judgment and decision-making.

In social identity theory, an implicit bias or implicit stereotype, is the pre-reflective attribution of particular qualities by an individual to a member of some social out group.

John Thomas Jost is a social psychologist best known for his work on system justification theory and the psychology of political ideology. Jost received his AB degree in Psychology and Human Development from Duke University (1989), where he studied with Irving E. Alexander, Philip R. Costanzo, David Goldstein, and Lynn Hasher, and his PhD in Social and Political Psychology from Yale University (1995), where he was the last doctoral student of Leonard Doob and William J. McGuire. He was also a doctoral student of Mahzarin R. Banaji and a postdoctoral trainee of Arie W. Kruglanski.

Nilanjana Dasgupta is a social psychologist whose work focuses on the effects of social contexts on implicit stereotypes - particularly on factors that insulate women in STEM fields from harmful stereotypes which suggest that females perform poorly in such areas. Dasgupta is a Professor of Psychology and is the Director of the Institute of Diversity Sciences and the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Jeffrey Sherman is a Social Psychologist and Professor of Psychology at the University of California, Davis. He is known for his research on social cognition, stereotyping, and implicit bias.

References

  1. ↑ (Dr. Bertram Gawronski, Ph.D. Homepage: http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/psychology/faculty/bg24397)
  2. ↑ (Dr. Bertram Gawronski, Ph.D. Homepage: http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/psychology/faculty/bg24397)
  3. ↑ (Google Scholar Profile: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=l73YtyQAAAAJ&hl=en)
  4. ↑ (New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/22/health/research/22bias.html)
  5. ↑ (Western News: http://communications.uwo.ca/com/media_newsroom/media_newsroom_stories/new_study_shows_%22undecideds%22_not_impartial_20120430447773/)
  6. ↑ (Science Daily: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/01/110118113445.htm)
  7. ↑ (Society for Personality and Social Psychology: http://www.spsp.org/annualawards/wegner-theoretical-innovation-prize)
  8. ↑ (International Social Cognition Network: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucjtrc1/ISCON/awards.html#paper)
  9. ↑ (Process Dissociation of Moral Dilemma Judgments: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234018664_Deontological_and_Utilitarian_Inclinations_in_Moral_Decision_Making_A_Process_Dissociation_Approach)
  10. ↑ (Process Dissociation of Moral Dilemma Judgments: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315498219_Consequences_Norms_and_Generalized_Inaction_in_Moral_Dilemmas_The_CNI_Model_of_Moral_Decision-Making)
  11. ↑ (European Association of Social Psychology: http://www.easp.eu/activities/own/awards/ejsp.htm Archived 2013-06-28 at the Wayback Machine )
  12. ↑ (Canada Research Chairs: http://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/chairholders-titulaires/profile-eng.aspx?profileid=1698)
  13. ↑ (Society for Personality and Social Psychology: http://www.spsp.org/annualawards/wegner-theoretical-innovation-prize)
  14. ↑ (Society of Experimental Social Psychology: http://www.sesp.org/memlist.htm Archived 2013-05-11 at the Wayback Machine )
  15. ↑ (International Social Cognition Network: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucjtrc1/ISCON/awards.html#earlycareer)
  16. ↑ (Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation: http://www.mri.gov.on.ca/english/news/Era081307_london_bd.asp Archived 2008-10-06 at the Wayback Machine )
  17. ↑ (German Psychological Society: http://www.dgps.de/aktivitaeten/preise/2008.php#charlotteundkarlbuehler Archived 2010-02-10 at the Wayback Machine )
  18. ↑ (University of Western Ontario: http://president.uwo.ca/honour_roll/faculty/scholars_recipients.html)
  19. ↑ (Canada Research Chairs: http://www.chairs-chaires.gc.ca/chairholders-titulaires/profile-eng.aspx?profileid=1698)
  20. ↑ (Association for Psychological Science: http://www.psychologicalscience.org/fellows/fellows.cfm Archived 2003-04-22 at the Wayback Machine )
  21. ↑ (Midwestern Psychological Association: http://www.midwesternpsych.org/)
  22. ↑ (Society of Experimental Social Psychology: http://www.sesp.org/trajectory.htm)
  23. ↑ (Society for Personality and Social Psychology: )
  24. ↑ (International Social Cognition Network: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucjtrc1/ISCON/awards.html#paper)
  25. ↑ (Society for Personality and Social Psychology: http://www.spsp.org/annualawards/wegner-theoretical-innovation-prize)
  26. ↑ (University of Texas at Austin: http://endowments.giving.utexas.edu/page/wechsler-david-reg-chair-psych/1974/ Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine )
  27. ↑ (Society for Personality and Social Psychology: https://spsp.org/awards/annualawards/midcareer/diener-award-social-psychology)
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.