CAPTCHA

Last updated

This CAPTCHA (Version 1 ) of "smwm" obscures its message from computer interpretation by twisting the letters and adding a slight background color gradient. Captcha.jpg
This CAPTCHA (Version 1 ) of "smwm" obscures its message from computer interpretation by twisting the letters and adding a slight background color gradient.

A CAPTCHA ( /ˈkæp.tʃə/ KAP-chə) is a type of challenge–response test used in computing to determine whether the user is human in order to deter bot attacks and spam. [1]

Contents

The term was coined in 2003 by Luis von Ahn, Manuel Blum, Nicholas J. Hopper, and John Langford. [2] It is a contrived acronym for "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart." [3] A historically common type of CAPTCHA (displayed as Version 1.0[ clarification needed ]) was first invented in 1997 by two groups working in parallel. This form of CAPTCHA requires entering a sequence of letters or numbers in a distorted image. Because the test is administered by a computer, in contrast to the standard Turing test that is administered by a human, CAPTCHAs are sometimes described as reverse Turing tests. [4]

Two widely used CAPTCHA services are Google's reCAPTCHA [5] [6] and the independent hCaptcha. [7] [8] It takes the average person approximately 10 seconds to solve a typical CAPTCHA. [9]

Purpose

CAPTCHAs' purpose is to prevent spam on websites, such as promotion spam, registration spam, and data scraping, and bots are less likely to abuse websites with spamming if those websites use CAPTCHA. Many websites use CAPTCHA effectively to prevent bot raiding. CAPTCHAs are designed so that humans can complete them, while most robots cannot. [10] Newer CAPTCHAs look at the user's behaviour on the internet, to prove that they are a human. [11] A normal CAPTCHA test only appears if the user acts like a bot, such as when they request webpages, or click links too fast.

History

Since the 1980s–1990s, users have wanted to make text illegible to computers. [12] The first such people were hackers, posting about sensitive topics to Internet forums they thought were being automatically monitored on keywords. To circumvent such filters, they replaced a word with look-alike characters. HELLO could become |-|3|_|_() or )-(3££0, and others, such that a filter could not detect all of them. This later became known as leetspeak. [13]

One of the earliest commercial uses of CAPTCHAs was in the Gausebeck–Levchin test. In 2000, idrive.com began to protect its signup page [14] with a CAPTCHA and prepared to file a patent. [12] In 2001, PayPal used such tests as part of a fraud prevention strategy in which they asked humans to "retype distorted text that programs have difficulty recognizing." [15] PayPal co founder and CTO Max Levchin helped commercialize this use.

A popular deployment of CAPTCHA technology, reCAPTCHA, was acquired by Google in 2009. [16] In addition to preventing bot fraud for its users, Google used reCAPTCHA and CAPTCHA technology to digitize the archives of The New York Times and books from Google Books in 2011. [17]

Invention

Eran Reshef, Gili Raanan and Eilon Solan, who worked at Sanctum on Application Security Firewall, first patented CAPTCHA in 1997. Their patent application details that "The invention is based on applying human advantage in applying sensory and cognitive skills to solving simple problems that prove to be extremely hard for computer software. Such skills include, but are not limited to processing of sensory information such as identification of objects and letters within a noisy graphical environment, signals and speech within an auditory signal, patterns and objects within a video or animation sequence". [18]

Characteristics

CAPTCHAs are automated, requiring little human maintenance or intervention to administer, producing benefits in cost and reliability. [19]

Modern text-based CAPTCHAs are designed such that they require the simultaneous use of three separate abilities—invariant recognition, segmentation, and parsing to complete the task. [20]

Each of these problems poses a significant challenge for a computer, even in isolation. Therefore, these three techniques in tandem make CAPTCHAs difficult for computers to solve. [23]

Whilst primarily used for security reasons, CAPTCHAs can also serve as a benchmark task for artificial intelligence technologies. According to an article by Ahn, Blum and Langford, [24] "any program that passes the tests generated by a CAPTCHA can be used to solve a hard unsolved AI problem." [25] They argue that the advantages of using hard AI problems as a means for security are twofold. Either the problem goes unsolved and there remains a reliable method for distinguishing humans from computers, or the problem is solved and a difficult AI problem is resolved along with it. [24]

Accessibility

Many websites require typing a CAPTCHA when creating an account to prevent spam. This image contains a user trying to type the CAPTCHA word "sepalbeam" to protect against automated spam. FancyCaptcha screenshot.png
Many websites require typing a CAPTCHA when creating an account to prevent spam. This image contains a user trying to type the CAPTCHA word "sepalbeam" to protect against automated spam.

CAPTCHAs based on reading text—or other visual-perception tasks—prevent blind or visually impaired users from accessing the protected resource. [26] [27] Because CAPTCHAs are designed to be unreadable by machines, common assistive technology tools such as screen readers cannot interpret them. The use of CAPTCHA thus excludes a small percentage of users from using significant subsets of such common Web-based services as PayPal, Gmail, Orkut, Yahoo!, many forum and weblog systems, etc. [28] In certain jurisdictions, site owners could become targets of litigation if they are using CAPTCHAs that discriminate against certain people with disabilities. For example, a CAPTCHA may make a site incompatible with Section 508 in the United States.

CAPTCHAs do not have to be visual. Any hard artificial intelligence problem, such as speech recognition, can be used as CAPTCHA. Some implementations of CAPTCHAs permit users to opt for an audio CAPTCHA, such as reCAPTCHA, though a 2011 paper demonstrated a technique for defeating the popular schemes at the time. [29]

A method of improving CAPTCHA to ease the work with it was proposed by ProtectWebForm and named "Smart CAPTCHA". [30] Developers are advised to combine CAPTCHA with JavaScript. Since it is hard for most bots to parse and execute JavaScript, a combinatory method which fills the CAPTCHA fields and hides both the image and the field from human eyes was proposed. [31]

One alternative method involves displaying to the user a simple mathematical equation and requiring the user to enter the solution as verification. Although these are much easier to defeat using software, they are suitable for scenarios where graphical imagery is not appropriate, and they provide a much higher level of accessibility for blind users than the image-based CAPTCHAs. These are sometimes referred to as MAPTCHAs (M = "mathematical"). However, these may be difficult for users with a cognitive disorder, such as dyscalculia. [32]

Challenges such as a logic puzzle, or trivia question can also be used as a CAPTCHA. There is research into their resistance against countermeasures. [33]

Circumvention

Two main ways to bypass CAPTCHA include using cheap human labor to recognize them, and using machine learning to build an automated solver. [34] According to former Google " click fraud czar" Shuman Ghosemajumder, there are numerous services which solve CAPTCHAs automatically. [35]

Machine learning-based attacks

There was not a systematic methodology for designing or evaluating early CAPTCHAs. [23] As a result, there were many instances in which CAPTCHAs were of a fixed length and therefore automated tasks could be constructed to successfully make educated guesses about where segmentation should take place. Other early CAPTCHAs contained limited sets of words, which made the test much easier to game. Still others[ example needed ] made the mistake of relying too heavily on background confusion in the image. In each case, algorithms were created that were successfully able to complete the task by exploiting these design flaws. However, light changes to the CAPTCHA could thwart them. Modern CAPTCHAs like reCAPTCHA rely on present variations of characters that are collapsed together, making them hard to segment, and they have warded off automated tasks. [36]

An example of a reCAPTCHA challenge from 2007, containing the words "following finding". The waviness and horizontal stroke were added to increase the difficulty of breaking the CAPTCHA with a computer program. Modern-captcha.jpg
An example of a reCAPTCHA challenge from 2007, containing the words "following finding". The waviness and horizontal stroke were added to increase the difficulty of breaking the CAPTCHA with a computer program.
A CAPTCHA usually has a text box directly underneath where the user should fill out the text that they see. In this case, "sclt ..was here". Captchacat.png
A CAPTCHA usually has a text box directly underneath where the user should fill out the text that they see. In this case, "sclt ..was here".

In October 2013, artificial intelligence company Vicarious claimed that it had developed a generic CAPTCHA-solving algorithm that was able to solve modern CAPTCHAs with character recognition rates of up to 90%. [37] However, Luis von Ahn, a pioneer of early CAPTCHA and founder of reCAPTCHA, said: "It's hard for me to be impressed since I see these every few months." 50 similar claims to that of Vicarious had been made since 2003. [38]

In August 2014 at Usenix WoOT conference, Bursztein et al. presented the first generic CAPTCHA-solving algorithm based on reinforcement learning and demonstrated its efficiency against many popular CAPTCHA schemas. [36]

In October 2018 at ACM CCS'18 conference, Ye et al. presented a deep learning-based attack that could consistently solve all 11 text captcha schemes used by the top-50 popular websites in 2018. An effective CAPTCHA solver can be trained using as few as 500 real CAPTCHAs. [39]

Human labor

It is possible to subvert CAPTCHAs by relaying them to a sweatshop of human operators who are employed to decode CAPTCHAs. A 2005 paper from a W3C working group said that they could verify hundreds per hour. [26] In 2010, the University of California at San Diego conducted a large scale study of CAPTCHA farms. The retail price for solving one million CAPTCHAs was as low as $1,000. [40]

Another technique consists of using a script to re-post the target site's CAPTCHA as a CAPTCHA to the attacker's site, which unsuspecting humans visit and solve within a short while for the script to use. [41] [42]

In 2023, the generative AI chatbot ChatGPT, tricked a TaskRabbit worker to solve a CAPTCHA by telling the worker it was not a robot and had impaired vision. [43]

Outsourcing to paid services

There are multiple Internet companies like 2Captcha and DeathByCaptcha that offer human and machine backed CAPTCHA solving services for as low as US$0.50 per 1000 solved CAPTCHAs. [44] These services offer APIs and libraries that enable users to integrate CAPTCHA circumvention into the tools that CAPTCHAs were designed to block in the first place. [45]

Insecure implementation

Howard Yeend has identified two implementation issues with poorly designed CAPTCHA systems: [46] reusing the session ID of a known CAPTCHA image, and CAPTCHAs residing on shared servers.

Sometimes, if part of the software generating the CAPTCHA is client-side (the validation is done on a server but the text that the user is required to identify is rendered on the client side), then users can modify the client to display the un-rendered text. Some CAPTCHA systems use MD5 hashes stored client-side, which may leave the CAPTCHA vulnerable to a brute-force attack. [47]

Alternative CAPTCHAs

Some researchers have proposed alternatives including image recognition CAPTCHAs which require users to identify simple objects in the images presented. The argument in favor of these schemes is that tasks like object recognition are more complex to perform than text recognition and therefore should be more resilient to machine learning based attacks.

Chew et al. published their work in the 7th International Information Security Conference, ISC'04, proposing three different versions of image recognition CAPTCHAs, and validating the proposal with user studies. It is suggested that one of the versions, the anomaly CAPTCHA, is best with 100% of human users being able to pass an anomaly CAPTCHA with at least 90% probability in 42 seconds. [48] Datta et al. published their paper in the ACM Multimedia '05 Conference, named IMAGINATION (IMAge Generation for INternet AuthenticaTION), proposing a systematic way to image recognition CAPTCHAs. Images are distorted so image recognition approaches cannot recognise them. [49]

Microsoft (Jeremy Elson, John R. Douceur, Jon Howell, and Jared Saul) claim to have developed Animal Species Image Recognition for Restricting Access (ASIRRA) which ask users to distinguish cats from dogs. Microsoft had a beta version of this for websites to use. [50] They claim "Asirra is easy for users; it can be solved by humans 99.6% of the time in under 30 seconds. Anecdotally, users seemed to find the experience of using Asirra much more enjoyable than a text-based CAPTCHA." This solution was described in a 2007 paper to Proceedings of 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS). [51] It was closed in October 2014. [52]

See also

Related Research Articles

Artificial intelligence (AI), in its broadest sense, is intelligence exhibited by machines, particularly computer systems. It is a field of research in computer science that develops and studies methods and software that enable machines to perceive their environment and uses learning and intelligence to take actions that maximize their chances of achieving defined goals. Such machines may be called AIs.

In the field of artificial intelligence (AI), tasks that are hypothesised to require artificial general intelligence to solve are informally known as AI-complete or AI-hard. Calling a problem AI-complete reflects the belief that it cannot be solved by a simple specific algorithm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optical character recognition</span> Computer recognition of visual text

Optical character recognition or optical character reader (OCR) is the electronic or mechanical conversion of images of typed, handwritten or printed text into machine-encoded text, whether from a scanned document, a photo of a document, a scene photo or from subtitle text superimposed on an image.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chatbot</span> Program that simulates conversation

A chatbot is a software application or web interface that is designed to mimic human conversation through text or voice interactions. Modern chatbots are typically online and use generative artificial intelligence systems that are capable of maintaining a conversation with a user in natural language and simulating the way a human would behave as a conversational partner. Such chatbots often use deep learning and natural language processing, but simpler chatbots have existed for decades.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manuel Blum</span> Venezuelan computer scientist

Manuel Blum is a Venezuelan born American computer scientist who received the Turing Award in 1995 "In recognition of his contributions to the foundations of computational complexity theory and its application to cryptography and program checking".

Address munging is the practice of disguising an e-mail address to prevent it from being automatically collected by unsolicited bulk e-mail providers. Address munging is intended to disguise an e-mail address in a way that prevents computer software from seeing the real address, or even any address at all, but still allows a human reader to reconstruct the original and contact the author: an email address such as, "no-one@example.com", becomes "no-one at example dot com", for instance.

An Internet bot, web robot, robot or simply bot, is a software application that runs automated tasks (scripts) on the Internet, usually with the intent to imitate human activity, such as messaging, on a large scale. An Internet bot plays the client role in a client–server model whereas the server role is usually played by web servers. Internet bots are able to perform simple and repetitive tasks much faster than a person could ever do. The most extensive use of bots is for web crawling, in which an automated script fetches, analyzes and files information from web servers. More than half of all web traffic is generated by bots.

Email harvesting or scraping is the process of obtaining lists of email addresses using various methods. Typically these are then used for bulk email or spam.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrei Broder</span> American computer scientist

Andrei Zary Broder is a distinguished scientist at Google. Previously, he was a research fellow and vice president of computational advertising for Yahoo!, and before that, the vice president of research for AltaVista. He has also worked for IBM Research as a distinguished engineer and was CTO of IBM's Institute for Search and Text Analysis.

Human-based computation (HBC), human-assisted computation, ubiquitous human computing or distributed thinking is a computer science technique in which a machine performs its function by outsourcing certain steps to humans, usually as microwork. This approach uses differences in abilities and alternative costs between humans and computer agents to achieve symbiotic human–computer interaction. For computationally difficult tasks such as image recognition, human-based computation plays a central role in training Deep Learning-based Artificial Intelligence systems. In this case, human-based computation has been referred to as human-aided artificial intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luis von Ahn</span> Guatemalan entrepreneur and software developer

Luis von Ahn is a Guatemalan entrepreneur, software developer, and consulting professor in the Computer Science Department at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. He is known as one of the pioneers of crowdsourcing. He is the founder of the company reCAPTCHA, which was sold to Google in 2009, and the co-founder and CEO of Duolingo.

reCAPTCHA CAPTCHA implementation owned by Google

reCAPTCHA Inc. is a CAPTCHA system owned by Google. It enables web hosts to distinguish between human and automated access to websites. The original version asked users to decipher hard-to-read text or match images. Version 2 also asked users to decipher text or match images if the analysis of cookies and canvas rendering suggested the page was being downloaded automatically. Since version 3, reCAPTCHA will never interrupt users and is intended to run automatically when users load pages or click buttons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progress in artificial intelligence</span> How AI-related technologies evolve

Progress in artificial intelligence (AI) refers to the advances, milestones, and breakthroughs that have been achieved in the field of artificial intelligence over time. AI is a multidisciplinary branch of computer science that aims to create machines and systems capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence. Artificial intelligence applications have been used in a wide range of fields including medical diagnosis, economic-financial applications, robot control, law, scientific discovery, video games, and toys. However, many AI applications are not perceived as AI: "A lot of cutting edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough it's not labeled AI anymore." "Many thousands of AI applications are deeply embedded in the infrastructure of every industry." In the late 1990s and early 21st century, AI technology became widely used as elements of larger systems, but the field was rarely credited for these successes at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turing test</span> Test of a machines ability to imitate human intelligence

The Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic).

Page Hunt is a game developed by Bing for investigating human research behavior. It is a so-called "game with a purpose", as it pursues additional goals: not only to provide entertainment but also to harness human computation for some specific research task. The term "games with a purpose" was coined by Luis von Ahn, inventor of CAPTCHA, co-organizer of the reCAPTCHA project, and inventor of a famous ESP game.

NuCaptcha is an early fraud detection service which utilises behavior analytics to provision threat appropriate, animated video CAPTCHAs. NuCaptcha is developed and operated by Canada-based firm NuData Security.

XRumer is a piece of software made for spamming online forums and comment sections. It is marketed as a program for search engine optimization and was created by BotmasterLabs. It is able to register and post to forums with the aim of boosting search engine rankings. The program is able to bypass security techniques commonly used by many forums and blogs to deter automated spam, such as account registration, client detection, many forms of CAPTCHAs, and e-mail activation before posting. The program utilises SOCKS and HTTP proxies in an attempt to make it more difficult for administrators to block posts by source IP, and features a proxy checking tool to verify the integrity and anonymity of the proxies used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elie Bursztein</span> French computer scientist and hacker (born 1980)

Elie Bursztein, born 1 June 1980 in France, is a French computer scientist and software engineer. He is currently Google and DeepMind AI cybersecurity technical and research lead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human presence detection</span> Technology for the detection of human bodies

Human presence detection is a range of technologies and methods for detecting the presence of a human body in an area of interest (AOI), or verification that computer, smartphone is operated by human. Software and hardware technologies are used for human presence detection. Unlike human sensing, that is dealing with human body only, human presence detection technologies are used to verify for safety, security or other reasons that human person, but not any other object is identified. Methods can be used for internet security authentication. These include software technologies such CAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA, as well as hardware technologies such as:

Proof of personhood (PoP) is a means of resisting malicious attacks on peer to peer networks, particularly, attacks that utilize multiple fake identities, otherwise known as a Sybil attack. Decentralized online platforms are particularly vulnerable to such attacks by their very nature, as notionally democratic and responsive to large voting blocks. In PoP, each unique human participant obtains one equal unit of voting power, and any associated rewards.

References

  1. ↑ "The reCAPTCHA Project – Carnegie Mellon University CyLab". www.cylab.cmu.edu. Archived from the original on 27 October 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2017.
  2. ↑ von Ahn, Luis; Blum, Manuel; Hopper, Nicholas J.; Langford, John (May 2003). "CAPTCHA: Using Hard AI Problems for Security" (PDF). Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2003. EUROCRYPT 2003: International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2656. pp. 294–311. doi: 10.1007/3-540-39200-9_18 . ISBN   978-3-540-14039-9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 May 2019. Retrieved 30 August 2019.
  3. ↑ "What is CAPTCHA?". Google Support. Google Inc. Archived from the original on 6 August 2020. Retrieved 9 September 2022. CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) is a [...]
  4. ↑ Mayumi Takaya; Yusuke Tsuruta; Akihiro Yamamura (30 September 2013). "Reverse Turing Test using Touchscreens and CAPTCHA" (PDF). Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications. 4 (3): 41–57. doi:10.22667/JOWUA.2013.09.31.041. Archived (PDF) from the original on 22 August 2017.
  5. ↑ "What is reCAPTCHA? –?reCAPTCHA Help". support.google.com. Archived from the original on 20 July 2023. Retrieved 20 July 2023.
  6. ↑ Sulgrove, Jonathan (7 July 2022). "reCAPTCHA: What It Is and Why You Should Use It on Your Website – TSTS". Twin State Technical Services. Archived from the original on 10 November 2022. Retrieved 10 November 2022.
  7. ↑ "Websites using hCaptcha". trends.builtwith.com. Archived from the original on 10 November 2022. Retrieved 10 November 2022.
  8. ↑ "hCaptcha – About Us". www.hcaptcha.com. Archived from the original on 20 July 2023. Retrieved 20 July 2023.
  9. ↑ Bursztein, Elie; Bethard, Steven; Fabry, Celine; Mitchell, John C.; Jurafsky, Dan (2010). "How Good Are Humans at Solving CAPTCHAs? A Large Scale Evaluation" (PDF). 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. pp. 399–413. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.164.7848 . doi:10.1109/SP.2010.31. ISBN   978-1-4244-6894-2. S2CID   14204454. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 August 2018. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
  10. ↑ Stec, Albert (12 June 2022). "What is CAPTCHA and How Does It Work?". Baeldung on Computer Science. Archived from the original on 1 November 2022. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
  11. ↑ "What is a CAPTCHA?". Cloudflare. 1 November 2022. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
  12. 1 2 "idrive turing patent application". Archived from the original on 15 March 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  13. ↑ "h2g2 – An Explanation of l33t Speak – Edited Entry". h2g2. 16 August 2002. Archived from the original on 6 September 2011. Retrieved 3 June 2015.
  14. ↑ "idrive turing signup page". Google Drive. Archived from the original on 15 March 2023. Retrieved 19 May 2017.
  15. ↑ Stringham, Edward P (2015). Private Governance : creating order in economic and social life. Oxford University Press. p. 105. ISBN   978-0-19-936516-6. OCLC   5881934034.
  16. ↑ "Teaching computers to read: Google acquires reCAPTCHA". Google Official Blog. Archived from the original on 31 August 2019. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  17. ↑ Gugliotta, Guy (28 March 2011). "Deciphering Old Texts, One Woozy, Curvy Word at a Time". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 November 2017. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  18. ↑ US 2005/0114705 A1,Reshef, Eran; Raanan, Gil & Solan, Eilon,"Method and system for discriminating a human action from a computerized action",published 26 May 2005 Archived 24 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine
  19. ↑ "How CAPTCHAs work | What does CAPTCHA mean?". Cloudflare. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  20. ↑ Chellapilla, Kumar; Larson, Kevin; Simard, Patrice; Czerwinski, Mary. "Designing Human Friendly Human Interaction Proofs (HIPs)" (PDF). Microsoft Research. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 April 2015.
  21. ↑ Karimi-Rouzbahani, Hamid; Bagheri, Nasour; Ebrahimpour, Reza (31 October 2017). "Invariant object recognition is a personalized selection of invariant features in humans, not simply explained by hierarchical feed-forward vision models". Scientific Reports. 7 (1): 14402. Bibcode:2017NatSR...714402K. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13756-8. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   5663844 . PMID   29089520.
  22. ↑ "Making CAPTCHAs Expensive Again: If You're Using Text-Based CAPTCHAs, You're Doing It Wrong | Tripwire". www.tripwire.com. Archived from the original on 28 October 2022. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  23. 1 2 Bursztein, Elie; Martin, Matthieu; Mitchell, John C. (2011). "Text-based CAPTCHA Strengths and Weaknesses". ACM Computer and Communication Security 2011 (CSS'2011). Archived from the original on 24 November 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  24. 1 2 von Ahn, Luis; Blum, Manuel; Hopper, Nicholas J.; Langford, John (2003). "CAPTCHA: Using Hard AI Problems for Security" (PDF). Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 2656. pp. 294–311. doi:10.1007/3-540-39200-9_18. ISBN   978-3-540-14039-9. S2CID   5658745. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 May 2019. Retrieved 30 August 2019.
  25. ↑ Moy, Gabriel; Jones, Nathan; Harkless, Curt; Potter, Randall (2004). Distortion estimation techniques in solving visual CAPTCHAs (PDF). Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Vol. 2. IEEE. pp. 23–28. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2004.1315140. ISBN   978-0-7695-2158-9. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 July 2020.
  26. 1 2 May, Matt (23 November 2005). "Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA". W3C. Archived from the original on 21 May 2012. Retrieved 27 April 2015.
  27. ↑ Shea, Michael (19 November 2015). "CAPTCHA: Spambots, eBooks and the Turing Test". The Skinny . Archived from the original on 27 January 2016. Retrieved 9 January 2016.
  28. ↑ "Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA". www.w3.org. Archived from the original on 4 November 2020. Retrieved 31 October 2020.
  29. ↑ Bursztein, Elie; Beauxis, Romain; Perito, Hristo; Paskov, Daniele; fabry, Celine; Mitchell, John C. (2011). "The Failure of Noise-Based Non-continuous Audio Captchas". 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. pp. 19–31. doi:10.1109/SP.2011.14. ISBN   978-1-4577-0147-4. S2CID   6933726. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  30. ↑ "Smart Captcha". Protect Web Form .COM. 8 October 2006. Archived from the original on 4 November 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2017.
  31. ↑ "Invisible reCAPTCHA". Google Developers. Archived from the original on 16 January 2020. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
  32. ↑ "Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA". www.w3.org. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  33. ↑ Gao, Song; Mohamed, Manar; Saxena, Nitesh; Zhang, Chengcui (23 June 2017). "Emerging-Image Motion CAPTCHAs: Vulnerabilities of Existing Designs, and Countermeasures". IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (Website). 16 (6) (1st ed.): 1040–1053. doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2017.2719031 . ISSN   1941-0018. S2CID   41097185.
  34. ↑ Jakobsson, Markus (August 2012). The death of the Internet. Archived from the original on 15 October 2014. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
  35. ↑ Ghosemajumder, Shuman (8 December 2015). "The Imitation Game: The New Frontline of Security". InfoQ. InfoQ. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 8 December 2015.
  36. 1 2 Bursztein, Elie; Aigrain, Johnathan; Mosciki, Angelika; Michell, John C. (August 2014). The End is Nigh: Generic Solving of Text-based CAPTCHAs. WoOT 2014: Usenix Workshop on Offensive Security. Archived from the original on 16 April 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  37. ↑ Summers, Nick. "Vicarious claims its AI software can crack up to 90% of CAPTCHAs offered by Google, Yahoo and PayPal". TNW. Archived from the original on 15 September 2018. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  38. ↑ Hof, Robert. "AI Startup Vicarious Claims Milestone In Quest To Build A Brain: Cracking CAPTCHA". Forbes. Archived from the original on 15 September 2018. Retrieved 25 August 2017.
  39. ↑ "Yet Another Text Captcha Solver: A Generative Adversarial Network Based Approach" (PDF). 25th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 2018. doi:10.1145/3243734.3243754. S2CID   53106794. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 October 2020. Retrieved 16 March 2020.
  40. ↑ Motoyama, Marti; Levchenko, Kirill; Kanich, Chris; McCoy, Damon; Geoffrey, Voelker; Savage, Stefan (August 2010). Re: CAPTCHAs-Understanding CAPTCHA-Solving Services in an Economic Context.s (PDF). USENIX Security Symposium, 2010. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 May 2016. Retrieved 5 April 2016.
  41. ↑ Doctorow, Cory (27 January 2004). "Solving and creating captchas with free porn". Boing Boing. Archived from the original on 9 February 2006. Retrieved 27 April 2015.
  42. ↑ "Hire People To Solve CAPTCHA Challenges". Petmail Design. 21 July 2005. Archived from the original on 18 September 2020. Retrieved 27 April 2015.
  43. ↑ Hurler, Kevin. "Chat-GPT Pretended to Be Blind and Tricked a Human Into Solving a CAPTCHA". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 11 April 2023.
  44. ↑ "Top 10 Captcha Solving Services Compared". Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 10 December 2018.
  45. ↑ "How Cybercriminals Bypass CAPTCHA". www.f5.com. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  46. ↑ Yeend, Howard (2005). "Breaking CAPTCHAs Without Using OCR". (pureMango.co.uk). Archived from the original on 25 June 2017. Retrieved 22 August 2006.
  47. ↑ "CTFtime.org / #kksctf open 2019 / Kackers blockchained notes / Writeup". ctftime.org. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  48. ↑ "Image Recognition CAPTCHAs" (PDF). Cs.berkeley.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 May 2013. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
  49. ↑ "Imagination Paper". Infolab.stanford.edu. Archived from the original on 2 October 2013. Retrieved 28 September 2013.
  50. ↑ "Asirra is a human interactive proof that asks users to identify photos of cats and dogs". Microsoft . Archived from the original on 15 December 2008.
  51. ↑ Elson, Jeremy; Douceur, John; Howell, Jon; Saul, Jared (October 2007). Asirra: A CAPTCHA that Exploits Interest-Aligned Manual Image Categorization. Proceedings of 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. Microsoft. Archived from the original on 15 December 2008. Retrieved 15 September 2017.
  52. ↑ "After 8 years of operation, Asirra is shutting down effective October 1, 2014. Thank you to all of our users!". Microsoft. Archived from the original on 7 February 2015.

Further references

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.