Capital punishment in Bangladesh

Last updated

Capital punishment in Bangladesh is a legal form of punishment [1] for anyone who is over 16, however in practice it will not apply to people under 18. [2] Crimes that are currently punishable by death in Bangladesh are set out in the Penal Code 1860. [3] These include waging war against Bangladesh, abetting mutiny, giving false evidence upon which an innocent person suffers death, murder, assisted suicide of a child, attempted murder of a child, and kidnapping. [4] The Code of Criminal Procedure 1898 provides that "he be hanged by the neck until he is dead." [5] For murder cases, the Appellate Division requires trial courts to weigh aggravating and mitigating factors to determine whether the death penalty is warranted. [6]

Contents

The Constitution of Bangladesh does not anywhere expressly recognise International Human Rights law, although some articles recognise international human rights. Article 25 of the Constitution recognises the United Nations Charter. Article 47 recognises international humanitarian law and provides that the Constitution will not limit the application of international treaties and the law of war. [7]

A person can receive the death penalty if they are found guilty of crimes against women and children. The Women and Children Repression Prevention Act 2000 provides that the death penalty can be imposed for murder or attempted murder involving burning, poison, or acid. [8] Causing grievous bodily harm by burning, poison or acid, if the victim's eyesight, hearing, face, breasts or reproductive organs are damaged. [9] Therefore, criminals in Bangladesh can be sentenced to death for attempted crimes and causing grievous bodily harm.

A number of offences (crimes not resulting in death) are punishable by death when committed by armed forces personnel. These offences include, providing aid to the enemy, cowardice and desertion and inducement to such and cowardly use of a flag of truce or any act calculated to imperil Bangladesh. [10]

According to the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, Bangladesh carried out six executions in 2017. [11]

International human rights law

Bangladesh was created as a consequence of human rights abuses. [12] When the Awami League won Pakistan's first election in 1970, the Pakistani Army brutally suppressed the Bengali people in East Pakistan. More than three million people were left dead, millions of women were raped, tens of millions of people were forced into extremely dirty and unpleasant refugee camps in India. [12] After India briefly invaded, Bangladesh was free from the brutality of Pakistani rule but faced a difficult task of rebuilding a country that was already desperately poor and prone to natural disasters. [12] To this day, Amnesty International believes Bangladesh is still wracked with human rights violations. [12]

The People's Republic of Bangladesh has ratified some International Human Rights Treaties. [13] However, the government has registered some declarations and reservations to particular articles of certain treaties. One reservation of particular importance is the reservation to Article 14 paragraph 1 of the Convention Against Torture (CAT). [14] The reservation grounds were that Bangladesh would apply it "in consonance with the existing laws and legislation of the country." [15]

Bangladesh has not yet ratified or acceded to a number of International Human Rights Treaties. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1976 was ratified in 2000. [16] However, the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) have not yet been ratified. [16] The Second Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at the abolition of the death penalty: 1991 has also not yet been ratified. [16]

The Human Rights Council under the Universal Periodic Review reviewed Bangladesh in 2009. A strong recommendation was made for the abolition of the death penalty. [17] The Bangladesh government in response to this said: "The death penalty is maintained in Bangladesh only as an exemplary punishment for heinous crimes such as throwing of acid, acts of terrorism, planned murder, trafficking of drugs, rape, abduction of women and children. Both the judiciary and administration deal with these cases of capital punishment with extreme caution and compassion, and such punishment is extended only in ultimate cases that relates to gross violation of human rights of the victims. Bangladesh has an extremely low rate of implementation of such death penalties." [18]

The fact that a very wide range of crimes are punishable by death potentially conflicts with Bangladesh's International obligations. Allowing the death penalty for crimes such as kidnapping or drug trafficking is contrary to the ICCPR's mandate which states that the death penalty should only be applied in the most serious of cases. [14]

Mandatory death sentences

The Women and Children Repressive Prevention Act 2000 provides that the punishment required for a person who causes death for dowry is a mandatory death sentence. This therefore means there is no other alternative punishment available and the jury are deprived the ability to apply discretion to certain circumstances relating to the crime or the accused.

State v Shukar Ali

This case is an example of the potentially unjust outcomes that can result from mandatory death sentences. On 12 July 2001, Shukar Ali, a 14-year-old boy who was convicted of sexually assaulting a 7-year-old girl which resulted in her death. At the time, the summer of 1999, Ali lived with his mother and elder sister in the slums of western Bangladesh’s Manikganj District. [19] He was not in a financial position to afford legal assistance, so he was appointed a defence lawyer by the State. This was not standard practice; however in this case was necessary because of the severity of the punishment that Ali would face if found guilty. [19] Ali was sentenced by the High Court Division to death by hanging under section 6 of an earlier version of the Women and Children Repressive Prevention Act, 1995. [20] The court held that they were compelled to make this decision regardless of his age. The court held "no alternative punishment has been provided for the offence that the condemned prisoner has been charged and we are left with no other discretion but to maintain the sentence if we believe that the prosecution has been able to prove beyond reasonable doubt. This is a case, which may be taken as "hard cases make bad laws". [21] On appeal, the Appellate Division commuted Ali's death sentence to life imprisonment for "until natural death". This was the first time the Supreme Court of Bangladesh ever overturned a decision. [19] The criminal law in Bangladesh has advanced significantly since Ali was first imprisoned. A law was introduced prohibiting the death penalty and life imprisonment for children. However, children are still held to be criminally responsible at the age of nine.

On 16 May 2010, the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh declared that sections 6(2), 6(3), and 6(4) of the Women and Children Repressive Prevention (Special Provision) Act, 1995 unconstitutional. [22] The court held that regardless of the offence, legislation may not provide that mandatory death sentences are the only available punishment. [14] The judge held, "A provision of law which deprives the court to use of its beneficent discretion in a matter of life and death, without regard to the circumstances in which the offence was committed and, therefore without regard to the gravity of the offence cannot but be regarded as harsh, unfair and oppressive. The legislature cannot make relevant circumstances irrelevant, deprive the court of its legitimate jurisdiction to exercise its discretion not to impose death sentence in appropriate cases. Determination of appropriate measures of punishment is judicial and not executive functions [sic]. The court will enunciate the relevant facts to be considered and weight to be given to them having regard to the situation of the case. Therefore we have no hesitation in holding the view that these provisions are against the fundamental tenets of our Constitution, and therefore, ultra vires the Constitution and accordingly they are declared void." [23]

International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)

The International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) (ICT of Bangladesh) is a domestic war tribunal in Bangladesh, which was set up to investigate and prosecute suspects for the genocide committed in 1971 by the Pakistan Army during the Bangladesh Liberation War. [24] The first person to be convicted in the Tribunal was Abul Kalam Azad, who had left the country and was not present for his trial. He was sentenced to death in 2013. The United Nations offered its support in 2009 to make sure that similar mistakes made by other Crimes tribunals were not made in Bangladesh. The head of the United Nations in Bangladesh said "this is the first time Bangladesh is conducting war crimes tribunals and it is important it understands how other countries have held them. There are some countries where mistakes were made and we don't want Bangladesh to repeat those mistakes." [25] However, there has been a shift since the commencement of the trials because there is concern the International Crimes Tribunal are not carrying out their obligations under Bangladesh's international human rights obligations, International Criminal law, and the Bangladesh Constitution. [26] Bangladesh is a State party to the ICCPR, therefore they have an obligation to meet the key provisions. Especially the provisions regarding fair trials and the rights of accused persons. [26]

Related Research Articles

Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty and formerly called judicial homicide, is the state-sanctioned practice of killing a person as a punishment for a crime, usually following an authorised, rule-governed process to conclude that the person is responsible for violating norms that warrant said punishment. The sentence ordering that an offender be punished in such a manner is known as a death sentence, and the act of carrying out the sentence is known as an execution. A prisoner who has been sentenced to death and awaits execution is condemned and is commonly referred to as being "on death row". Etymologically, the term capital refers to execution by beheading, but executions are carried out by many methods, including hanging, shooting, lethal injection, stoning, electrocution, and gassing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights</span> Treaty adopted by United Nations General Assembly in 1965

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) is a multilateral treaty that commits nations to respect the civil and political rights of individuals, including the right to life, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, electoral rights and rights to due process and a fair trial. It was adopted by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200A (XXI) on 16 December 1966 and entered into force on 23 March 1976 after its thirty-fifth ratification or accession. As of June 2022, the Covenant has 173 parties and six more signatories without ratification, most notably the People's Republic of China and Cuba; North Korea is the only state that has tried to withdraw.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Extradition</span> Transfer of a suspect from one jurisdiction to another by law enforcement

In an extradition, one jurisdiction delivers a person accused or convicted of committing a crime in another jurisdiction, over to the other's law enforcement. It is a cooperative law enforcement procedure between the two jurisdictions and depends on the arrangements made between them. In addition to legal aspects of the process, extradition also involves the physical transfer of custody of the person being extradited to the legal authority of the requesting jurisdiction.

An ex post facto law is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences of actions that were committed, or relationships that existed, before the enactment of the law. In criminal law, it may criminalize actions that were legal when committed; it may aggravate a crime by bringing it into a more severe category than it was in when it was committed; it may change the punishment prescribed for a crime, as by adding new penalties or extending sentences; it may extend the statute of limitations; or it may alter the rules of evidence in order to make conviction for a crime likelier than it would have been when the deed was committed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in India</span> Death penalty in India, its states and union territories

Capital punishment in India is a legal penalty for some crimes under the country's main substantive penal legislation, the Indian Penal Code, as well as other laws. Executions are carried out by hanging as the primary method of execution as given under Section 354(5) of the Criminal Code of Procedure, 1973 is "Hanging by the neck until dead", and is imposed only in the 'rarest of cases'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Switzerland</span> Overview of the observance of human rights in Switzerland

Human rights are largely respected in Switzerland, one of Europe's oldest democracies. Switzerland is often at or near the top in international rankings of civil liberties and political rights observance. Switzerland places human rights at the core of the nation's value system, as represented in its Federal Constitution. As described in its FDFA's Foreign Policy Strategy 2016-2019, the promotion of peace, mutual respect, equality and non-discrimination are central to the country's foreign relations.

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Pakistan. Although there have been numerous amendments to the Constitution, there is yet to be a provision prohibiting the death penalty as a punitive remedy.

Capital punishment in Malaysia is a legal penalty in Malaysian law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Armenia</span> Overview of the use of capital punishment in Armenia

Capital punishment in Armenia was a method of punishment that was implemented within Armenia's Criminal Code and Constitution until its eventual relinquishment in the 2003 modifications made to the Constitution. Capital punishment's origin in Armenia is unknown, yet it remained present in the Armenia Criminal Code of 1961, which was enforced and applied until 1999. Capital punishment was incorporated in Armenian legislation and effectuated for capital crimes, which were crimes that were classified to be punishable by death, this included: treason, espionage, first-degree murder, acts of terrorism and grave military crimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Greece</span> Overview of the state of capital punishment in Greece

Capital punishment in modern Greece was carried out using the guillotine or by firing squad. It was last applied in 1972 during the military junta, and the death penalty was abolished in stages between 1975 and 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment in Ireland</span> Overview of the capital punishment in Ireland

Capital punishment in the Republic of Ireland was abolished in statute law in 1990, having been abolished in 1964 for most offences including ordinary murder. The last person to be executed by the British state on the island of Ireland was Robert McGladdery, who was hanged on 20 December 1961 in Crumlin Road Gaol in Belfast, Northern Ireland. The last person to be executed by the state in the Republic of Ireland was Michael Manning, hanged for murder on 20 April 1954. All subsequent death sentences in the Republic of Ireland, the last handed down in 1985, were commuted by the President, on the advice of the Government, to terms of imprisonment of up to 40 years. The Twenty-first Amendment of the constitution, passed by referendum in 2001, prohibits the reintroduction of the death penalty, even during a state of emergency or war. Capital punishment is also forbidden by several human rights treaties to which the state is a party.

Capital punishment is legal in Tonga, but has not been imposed since 1982. The country's lack of executions puts it into the category of abolitionist in practice, where it retains the death penalty in law but has had a formal or informal moratorium for at least ten years. Tonga's low rate of murder convictions form part of the reason for the lack of executions, as well as its courts’ apparent unwillingness to impose the penalty unless it appears absolutely necessary to do so.

In the United States, human rights comprise a series of rights which are legally protected by the Constitution of the United States, state constitutions, treaty and customary international law, legislation enacted by Congress and state legislatures, and state referendums and citizen's initiatives. The Federal Government has, through a ratified constitution, guaranteed unalienable rights to its citizens and non-citizens. These rights have evolved over time through constitutional amendments, legislation, and judicial precedent. Along with the rights themselves, the portion of the population granted these rights has expanded over time. Within the United States, federal courts have jurisdiction over international human rights laws.

Capital punishment is not a legal punishment in the Independent State of Papua New Guinea.

The Cook Islands are 15 small islands scattered over 2 million km squared of the South Pacific. According to the latest census, the nation has a total population of approximately 18,000 people. Spread in population between the mainland capital, Rarotonga, and the Outer Islands mean inequality in terms of delivery of public services. Internal migration between Rarotonga and the Outer Islands is relatively high due to lack of schooling and employment opportunities, and increased living standards and availability of medical and educational services in Rarotonga.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh)</span> Domestic war crimes tribunal

The International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) (ICT of Bangladesh) is a domestic war crimes tribunal in Bangladesh set up in 2009 to investigate and prosecute suspects for the genocide committed in 1971 by the Pakistan Army and their local collaborators, Razakars, Al-Badr and Al-Shams during the Bangladesh Liberation War. During the 2008 general election, the Awami League (AL) pledged to try war criminals. The government set up the tribunal after the Awami League won the general election in December 2008 with a more than two-thirds majority in parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abdul Quader Mollah</span> A convicted war criminal and Islamist politician from Bangladesh.

Abdul Quader Mollah was a Bangladeshi Islamist leader, writer, and politician of the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, who was convicted of war crimes and sentenced to death by the International Crimes Tribunal, Bangladesh (ICT) set up by the government of Bangladesh and hanged. The United Nations raised objections to the trial's fairness, while the general public in Bangladesh widely supported the execution.

The Isle of Man is a Crown Dependency located in the Irish Sea between the islands of Great Britain and Ireland with a population in 2015 estimated to be approximately 88,000. It enjoys a high degree of domestic, legislative and political autonomy through its ancient Parliament Tynwald. By convention, the United Kingdom Government is responsible for the conduct of the international relations and defence of the island. The Isle of Man does not have a written constitution, or a Bill of Rights which sets out its Human Rights. These rights are addressed in the Human Rights Act 2001. The island has also ratified a number of international treaties.

Capital punishment in Lesotho is legal. However, despite not having any official death penalty moratorium in place, the country has not carried out any executions since the 1990s and is therefore considered de facto abolitionist.

References

  1. ↑ /"Death Penalty | Amnesty International". Amnesty.org. 15 March 2014. Retrieved 2015-11-22.
  2. ↑ ["Bangladesh". The Death Penalty Worldwide database. Center for International Human Rights, Northwestern University School of Law. Retrieved 22 November 2013.]
  3. ↑ Penal Code 1860, s.121, s.132, s.302, s.305.
  4. ↑ Bangladesh:Criminal justice through the prism of capital punishment and the fight against terrorism
  5. ↑ Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, s 368.
  6. ↑ file:///Users/claudialeighs/Downloads/The_Mandatory_Death_Penalty_in_India_and_Bangladesh_stamped.pdf
  7. ↑ The Constitution of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, arts. 25, 47, 4 November 1972.
  8. ↑ Women and Children Repression Prevention Act 2000, section 4.
  9. ↑ Women and Children Repression Prevention Act 2000, section 4(2).
  10. ↑ "The death penalty and the "most serious crimes"" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2020.
  11. ↑ "Facts and figures" . Retrieved 10 January 2020.
  12. 1 2 3 4 "Bangladesh". Amnesty International USA. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
  13. ↑ "United Nations Treaty Collection". treaties.un.org. Retrieved 24 July 2019.
  14. 1 2 3 "Criminal justice through the prism of capital punishment and the fight against terrorism" (PDF). Retrieved 10 January 2020.
  15. ↑ visit www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cat-reserve.htm.
  16. 1 2 3 "- OHCHR Dashboard". indicators.ohchr.org. Retrieved 17 June 2019.
  17. ↑ Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Bangladesh’. UN Doc A/HRC/11/18. 5 October 2009.
  18. ↑ Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Bangladesh, Addendum’ UN Doc A/HCR/11/18/Add.1, 9 June 2009, 4, Recommendation 19.
  19. 1 2 3 "CRIN". CRIN. Retrieved 29 May 2019.
  20. ↑ The Women and Children Repressive Prevention Act 1995
  21. ↑ State vs Sukur Ali [9 (2004) BLC (HCD) 238].
  22. ↑ Writ Petition No. 8283 of 2005. BLAST vs State (Not yet reported).
  23. ↑ Sukur Ali, Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust and others v. The State, pp. 60–61, Civil Appeal No. 116 of 2010 with Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 374 of 2011, Supreme Court of Bangladesh, 5 May 2015.
  24. ↑ Wierda, Marieke; Triolo, Anthony (2012). Reydams, Luc; Wouters, Jan; Ryngaert, Cedric (eds.). International prosecutors. Oxford University Press. p. 169. ISBN   978-0-19-955429-4.
  25. ↑ "UN to help Bangladesh war crimes trial planning". Dawn. 8 April 2009. Retrieved 29 May 2019.
  26. 1 2 "Letter to the Bangladesh Prime Minister regarding the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act". Human Rights Watch. 18 May 2011. Retrieved 29 May 2019.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.