Captive insurance

Last updated

Captive insurance is an alternative to self-insurance in which a parent group or groups create a licensed insurance company to provide coverage for itself. The main purpose of doing so is to avoid using traditional commercial insurance companies, which have volatile pricing and may not meet the specific needs of the company. By creating their own insurance company, the parent company can reduce their costs, insure difficult risks, have direct access to reinsurance markets, and increase cash flow. [1] When a company creates a captive they are indirectly able to evaluate the risks of subsidiaries, write policies, set premiums and ultimately either return unused funds in the form of profits, or invest them for future claim payouts. [2] Captive insurance companies sometimes insure the risks of the group's customers. This is an alternative form of risk management that is becoming a more practical and popular means[ according to whom? ] through which companies can protect themselves financially while having more control over how they are insured.[ citation needed ]

Contents

There are many variations of how captives can be set up, which can be broken into two categories. The first category is known as non-sponsored in which the company is the creator and beneficiary. Within that category the most common are single-parent or “pure”, group and association. The second category is sponsored in which the captive is owned and controlled by another company that allows other companies to “rent” insurance. This category includes Protected Cell Captive Insurers and Rental Captives. [3]

Origin of term

The term "captive" was coined by the "father of captive insurance", Frederic M. Reiss, while he was bringing his concept into practice for his first client, the Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company, in Ohio in the 1950s. [4] The company had a series of mining operations, and its management referred to the mines whose output was put solely to the corporation's use as captive mines. When Reiss helped the company incorporate its own insurance subsidiaries, they were called captive insurance companies because they wrote insurance exclusively for the captive mines. Reiss continued to use the term: the policyholder owns the insurance company i.e. the insurer is captive to the policyholder. If the captive insures its own parent and affiliates, it is called a pure captive. If it insures just one type of industry (e.g. energy industries), it is called a homogeneous captive. A captive insurance company can also insure a group of diverse companies; this is called a heterogeneous captive.

Domicile

Captives are licensed by many jurisdictions. The captive's primary jurisdiction is known as its domicile. The captives are then regulated by local insurance authority agencies, which require that captives have enough money to pay claims as well as maintain a minimum surplus. Most captive insurers are based "offshore", in places such as Gibraltar, Mauritius, Belize, Bermuda, The Cayman Islands, Ireland, Guernsey, Luxembourg, Barbados, Malta, The Bahamas, Singapore, Anguilla, the British Virgin Islands, Qatar Financial Centre and Dubai International Financial Centre.

Bermuda is the world's leading offshore captive domicile. The onshore regulatory burden and the cost of operating either a US-based or Lloyd's-based captive in the early 1960s drove Reiss to seek out a jurisdiction that would allow his captive concept to flourish. After much investigation, he chose Bermuda, due to its geographical location, clean reputation and status as a British Dependent Territory, which avoided the risks and uncertainties often experienced by international businesses operating in politically unstable and unaccountable jurisdictions. Bermuda's captives are predominantly owned by large US corporations. The Cayman Islands is the second largest licensing jurisdiction in terms of the number of captives licensed. Vermont, in the United States, is second in terms of insurance company assets but third in terms of captives licensed. Healthcare corporations prefer Bermuda, due to the ease of claim payment provided by the regulatory environment. [5]

Luxembourg is the largest captive reinsurance domicile in the EU. [6]

A recent trend has various states in the United States revising their regulations to be more attractive to captive insurance companies. For example, Oregon has removed premium taxes from captives, instead charging a $5,000 annual fee. [7] In the United States, Vermont is home to more captive insurers than any other US state, with nearly 900 licensed captive companies as of August 2009.[ citation needed ] In past years, Anguilla was a fast growing offshore domicile which ended in 2013. More recently, Anguilla along with other offshore domiciles have seen few new formations and many liquidations and transfers. As with the BVI, ever changing applications of the regulations and the departures of well regarded regulators have ended Anguilla as a domiciles for new formations. Meanwhile, Montana, [8] Delaware, Tennessee, and Utah have been the fastest growing US domiciles. [9] In 2013, Texas [10] began allowing captives.

Business lines

Captives can cover lines of business, such as workers' compensation, that have relatively predictable claim rates.[ citation needed ] They can access the reinsurance market to lay off (transfer) risks that they do not wish to accept: this may include product liability, general and professional liability and directors' and officers' liability. Vehicle insurance, both property damage and third party liability of corporate fleets and vehicles, is also quite commonly covered. [11]

Regulation

Captives may be licensed to write some lines of business directly. In other cases, such as workers' compensation in the US, for example, the business must initially be written by another insurer, under its insurance licence, which then reinsures it (lays it off) to the captive. The original insurer retains a fee, usually somewhere between 5% and 15%, to provide this service. Premiums paid to captives are tax deductible, provided the terms of the policy (including the premium amount) are reasonable. A captive cannot arbitrarily set the premium amount simply to generate a deduction for the parent. In most situations, the captive carrier should be able to demonstrate its premium generating process (underwriting).

In the European Union, a new set of regulatory requirements (Solvency II) is planned with additional restrictions and responsibilities for captives and reinsurance companies. Some European captives ask for simplified regulation. [12]

Captive manager

Reiss created the first captive management company, International Risk Management Limited (IRML), in Bermuda in 1962 to provide the administration of his client's captives (this is now part of the Aon Corporation). [13] Most captive management is usually outsourced to a captive manager located in the jurisdiction that holds the primary license for the captive.[ citation needed ]

In the US, most captive managers are small administrative services providers. [14] They don’t draft insurance policies, which is generally the function of a senior insurance or corporate lawyer; they don’t price policies, which is done by an actuary or underwriter; and they don’t purport to be responsible for state or federal tax issues, which is what a tax lawyer does. Other captive management firms provide a full turnkey service to include all aspects of forming and managing a captive insurer on an ongoing basis, which would include professionals that understand the insurance, tax, and legal aspects of a captive. [15] The middle market is the area of growth for captive managers because more than 90% of Fortune 500 companies already do captives, according to Capstone Associated Services Ltd., [16] a comprehensive manager of small captive insurers with over 140 captives formed for the middle market in the last 15+ years.

Captive insurance companies are creatures of the Internal Revenue Code. Over 75% of the world’s captives are associated with the United States because these insurance arrangements are encouraged under the Internal Revenue Code. Because captives are sophisticated tax structures (having been the subject of dozens of cases and rulings by the IRS, the Tax Court and various appellate courts over the past 70 years) captive owners often engage tax professionals in addition to captive managers that simply provide administrative services. [17] [18]

Micro captives

Over 90 percent of Fortune 1000 companies and many successful middle market businesses have captives. Over half of all property and casualty premiums that are written, are written through captives. [15]

The Section 831(b) or "small" P&C captive, also known as a "micro captive" is used by midsize companies looking for cost-effective ways to transfer risk. [19] Captive experts say an 831(b) introduces middle market companies to alternative risk transfer and its benefits, providing this class of insurance buyers a valuable cost-saving tool long utilized by Fortune 1000 companies. The Section 831(b) captive or “small” property and casualty captive is one of the most popular choices for middle market companies. [20]

Sheltering income from taxes

Captive insurance policies can be "designed so that the risks they insure are so unlikely that the captives will never pay out a claim and all those premiums will go back to the business owners or their heirs with little or no tax." [21]

Main captive domiciles

DomicileCaptive numberPercentage
Bermuda*
958
19.3%
Cayman Islands*
765
15.4%
Vermont*
567
11.4%
Guernsey*
368
7.4%
Luxembourg*
262
5.3%
Barbados*
256
5.2%
Delaware*
251
5.1%
Ireland*
224
4.5%
British Virgin Islands*
195
3.2%
Hawaii*
163
3.3%
South Carolina*
158
3.2%
Isle of Man
130
2.6%
Nevada*
115
2.3%
Arizona*
108
2.2%
Utah
100
2.0%
Turks & Caicos
71
1.4%
Singapore
57
1.1%
Sweden
41
0.8%
Switzerland
41
0.8%
District of Columbia
40
0.8%
Labuan#
32
0.6%
New York
27
0.5%
Netherlands
26
0.5%
Vanuatu
25
0.5%
Bahamas
23
0.5%
Total
5,003
100.0%

Not listed above by Business Insurance News is Montana with 150 captives as of December 2013 and Anguilla which has more than 300 captives as of December 2012. Delaware does not report.

*2008 Updated stats. Source: Business Insurance News Captives 2008
**2008 Updated stats. Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20080821225209/http://www.captive.utah.gov/hotnews.html
#2007 Updated stats. Source: LOFSA 2007 Annual Report

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insurance</span> Equitable transfer of the risk of a loss, from one entity to another in exchange for payment

Insurance is a means of protection from financial loss in which, in exchange for a fee, a party agrees to compensate another party in the event of a certain loss, damage, or injury. It is a form of risk management, primarily used to protect against the risk of a contingent or uncertain loss.

Terrorism insurance is insurance purchased by property owners to cover their potential losses and liabilities that might occur due to terrorist activities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reinsurance</span> Insurance purchased by an insurance company

Reinsurance is insurance that an insurance company purchases from another insurance company to insulate itself from the risk of a major claims event. With reinsurance, the company passes on ("cedes") some part of its own insurance liabilities to the other insurance company. The company that purchases the reinsurance policy is referred to as the "ceding company" or "cedent". The company issuing the reinsurance policy is referred to as the "reinsurer". In the classic case, reinsurance allows insurance companies to remain solvent after major claims events, such as major disasters like hurricanes or wildfires. In addition to its basic role in risk management, reinsurance is sometimes used to reduce the ceding company's capital requirements, or for tax mitigation or other purposes.

Chubb Limited is an American company incorporated in Zürich, Switzerland. It is the parent company of Chubb, a global provider of insurance products covering property and casualty, accident and health, reinsurance, and life insurance and is the largest publicly traded property and casualty insurance company in the world. Chubb operates in 55 countries and territories and in the Lloyd's insurance market in London. Clients of Chubb consist of multinational corporations and local businesses, individuals, and insurers seeking reinsurance coverage. Chubb provides commercial and personal property and casualty insurance, personal accident and supplemental health insurance, reinsurance and life insurance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General insurance</span> Non-life insurance policies

General insurance or non-life insurance policy, including automobile and homeowners policies, provide payments depending on the loss from a particular financial event. General insurance is typically defined as any insurance that is not determined to be life insurance. It is called property and casualty insurance in the United States and Canada and non-life insurance in Continental Europe.

Markel Group Inc. is a group of companies headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, and originally founded in 1930 as an insurance company.

Financial reinsurance is a form of reinsurance which is focused more on capital management than on risk transfer. In the non-life segment of the insurance industry this class of transactions is often referred to as finite reinsurance.

A segregated portfolio company, sometimes referred to as a protected cell company, is a company which segregates the assets and liabilities of different classes of shares from each other and from the general assets of the SPC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Axa XL</span> Bermuda-domiciled insurance company

Axa XL is an American subsidiary of global insurance and reinsurance company Axa. It is headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, domiciled in Hamilton, Bermuda, and has more than 100 offices on 6 continents.

Reinsurance sidecars, conventionally referred to as "sidecars", are financial structures that are created to allow investors to take on the risk and return of a group of insurance policies written by an insurer or reinsurer and earn the risk and return that arises from that business. A re/insurer will only pay ("cede") the premiums associated with a book of business to such an entity if the investors place sufficient funds in the vehicle to ensure that it can meet claims if they arise. Typically, the liability of investors is limited to these funds. These structures have become quite prominent in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina as a vehicle for re/insurers to add risk-bearing capacity, and for investors to participate in the potential profits resulting from sharp price increases in re/insurance over the four quarters following Katrina. An earlier and smaller generation of sidecars were created after 9/11 for the same purpose.

Alternative risk transfer is the use of techniques other than traditional insurance and reinsurance to provide risk-bearing entities with coverage or protection. The field of alternative risk transfer grew out of a series of insurance capacity crises in the 1970s through 1990s that drove purchasers of traditional coverage to seek more robust ways to buy protection.

Insurance law is the practice of law surrounding insurance, including insurance policies and claims. It can be broadly broken into three categories - regulation of the business of insurance; regulation of the content of insurance policies, especially with regard to consumer policies; and regulation of claim handling wise.

Gard is a mutual company and operates around the world within marine insurance. It is the largest Protection & Indemnity insurer of the 12 P&I Clubs that are members of the International Group of P&I Clubs.

Insurance in the United States refers to the market for risk in the United States, the world's largest insurance market by premium volume. According to Swiss Re, of the $6.782 trillion of global direct premiums written worldwide in 2022, $2.959 trillion (43.6%) were written in the United States.

An insurance-linked security (ILS) is a financial instrument whose value is driven by insurance loss events. Those such instruments that are linked to property losses due to natural catastrophes represent a unique asset class, the return from which is uncorrelated with that of the general financial market.

A risk retention group (RRG) in business economics is an alternative risk transfer entity in the United States created under the federal Liability Risk Retention Act (LRRA). RRGs must form as liability insurance companies under the laws of at least one state—its charter state or domicile. The policyholders of the RRG are also its owners and membership must be limited to organizations or persons engaged in similar businesses or activities, thus being exposed to the same types of liability.

Captive insurance structures can be classified into three main categories: Single Parent Captives, Group Captives, and Core Cell Captive Insurance Companies, also known as Cell Captives or Core Cell Companies.

The Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010 is a United States law regulating the sale of insurance in states where the insurer is usually not authorized to sell insurance. It prevents states other than the home state of a U.S. insurance company from imposing regulations or taxes on the sale of nonadmitted insurance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Argo Group</span> Bermuda-based insurance underwriter

Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd, or Argo Group (NYSE: ARGO), is a Bermuda-based international underwriter of specialty insurance products in the property and casualty market.

Internal Revenue Code (I.R.C.) Section 831(b) is a U.S. tax law that provides specific tax benefits to certain small insurance companies, often referred to as "micro-captives". Established to encourage the formation of small insurance companies, it offers an alternative risk-management solution that can supplement or even replace traditional insurance coverage.

References

  1. "Protected or Segregated Cell Rental Captive Insurance Companies". www.captive.com. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
  2. [ citation needed ]
  3. "*|MC:SUBJECT|*". www.naic.org. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
  4. Held Captive; Catherine Duffy p. 38
  5. Mitchell, D. (2013) Captive Carriers in Healthcare 101. American Society of Healthcare Risk Management. October, 2012.
  6. "REINSURANCE". Luxembourg for Finance. Archived from the original on 14 July 2014. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
  7. Zolkos, Rodd (April 2, 2012). "Oregon becomes newest U.S. captive domicile". Business Insurance. Retrieved April 3, 2012.
  8. "Risk Management – How Montana Has Become a Captive Domicile Hotbed in Recent Years". www.rmmagazine.com. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
  9. Captive Insurance Times, October 1, 2012 “Domiciles that make sense”
  10. http://www.tdi.texas.gov/rules/2013/documents/Captive_Rule_final_a.pdf#xml=http://www.tdi.texas.gov/tdisrch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getpdfhits&u=ffffffffc6357490&stgd=yes&DocId=779972&request=captive%20insurance&index=*ab23fd4bb4d6322239cbac263ac909ac&searchFlags=4356&autoStopLimit=200&SearchForm=D%3a\www\search\tdisearchform.html&.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  11. A.M. Best Special Report (7/30/2007)
  12. http://www.eciroa.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/position-paper-captives-solvency-ii.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  13. "Company Overview of Aon International Risk Management Group", July 09, 2016, https://www.bloomberg.com/Research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapid=1513818
  14. Captive Review, January 2013, "The 'Captive Manager' Fallacy," pp. 49–50
  15. 1 2 "Capstone Forms 100th Captive Insurance Company". Insurance Journal. 2011-01-24. Retrieved 2023-11-09.
  16. Contributor, BMO Harris. "BMO Harris BankVoice: Why Companies Are Opting For Captive Insurance Arrangements". Forbes . Retrieved 30 March 2018.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  17. Sullivan, Paul (2012-07-13). "An Insurer of One's Own? It's Possible, With Caveats". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2023-02-22.
  18. Captive Review, January 2013, "The 'Captive Manager' Fallacy," pp. 49–51
  19. "831(b) Captives: 'Small' Option Is Increasingly Big Idea for Midsize Cos". PropertyCasualty360. Retrieved 2023-11-09.
  20. "BMO Harris Bank BrandVoice: Why Companies Are Opting For Captive Insurance Arrangements". Forbes. Retrieved 2023-02-22.
  21. "I.R.S. Is Looking Into Captive Insurance Shelters". The New York Times . April 10, 2015. Retrieved 2015-04-13.