Competition Tribunal | |
---|---|
French: Tribunal de la concurrence | |
Judge term length | 7 years |
Number of positions | 4 |
Type of tribunal | Tribunal |
Chairperson | |
Currently | Andrew D. Little |
Since | April 30, 2022 |
Lead position ends | November 4, 2027 |
Judicial Members | |
Currently |
|
Lay Members | |
Currently |
|
Tribunal overview | |
Preceding Tribunal |
|
Key documents |
|
Website | ct-tc |
The Competition Tribunal (French : Tribunal de la concurrence) is the federal adjudicative body in Canada responsible for cases regarding competition laws under the Competition Act . [1]
The Tribunal hears cases that deal with such matters as business mergers; abuse of dominant position; agreements between competitors; refusal to comply; price maintenance; other restrictive trade practices; deceptive marketing practices; specialization agreements; delivered pricing; foreign judgments, law, and directives that "adversely affect economic activity in Canada;" and refusals to supply by foreign suppliers. [2]
The Tribunal is headed by a Chairperson, currently Andrew D. Little, who was appointed on April 30, 2022, which he will serve until November 4, 2027. [3]
The Tribunal is one of two Canadian federal organizations responsible for competition law and the Competition Act, with the other being the Competition Bureau. The vast majority of cases are resolved by the Bureau prior to reaching the Tribunal. [4]
The Tribunal was founded as the Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, which was empowered to investigate suspected offenses under the Combines Investigation Act . [1] [5] [6]
In 1986, the Government of Canada enacted major reforms of Canada's competition law by introducing simultaneously the Competition Tribunal Act [7] and the Competition Act , [8] the latter of which would replace the Combines Investigation Act. [5] [6] The Competition Act dissolved the Restrictive Trade Practices Commission and created the Competition Tribunal and the Competition Bureau. Unlike the Commission, the Competition Tribunal has no authority to investigate offenses, as investigations are now the responsibility of the Competition Bureau to carry. [4] Rather, the Tribunal simply can make findings and issue remedial orders. [1]
On June 30, 1986, Justice Barbara Reed was designated by the Governor in Council as the Tribunal's first Chairperson. In 1993, Justice William McKeown became the second Chairperson, holding the position until 2002. [5]
In 2002, various changes were made to the Competition Act and the Competition Tribunal Act. Private parties were given the right to initiate proceedings before the Tribunal in certain cases. The Tribunal could also hear references filed pursuant to section 124.2 of the Competition Act and award costs of proceedings before it. [5]
The Tribunal has a hybrid composition, made up of both judicial members from the Federal Court and expert lay people, i.e., "non-judicial members who are knowledgeable in economics, industry, commerce or public affairs." [5] [4] Members are appointed by Governor in Council for fixed terms of up to seven years (reappointment is also allowed), with judicial members on the recommendation of the Minister of Justice, and lay members on the recommendation of the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry. [3]
Judges adjudicate issues of law, while judges and lay people may adjudicate issues of mixed law and fact. [4] The Tribunal's decisions may be appealed to the Federal Court of Appeal. [4]
The Tribunal is headed by a Chairperson, who also decides the allocation of work of the Tribunal members. [5] The Chairperson is appointed by the Governor in Council from one of the judicial members. [3]
Member | First appointed | End of current term |
---|---|---|
Andrew D. Little, Chairperson | November 5, 2020 | November 4, 2027 |
Jocelyne Gagné | December 21, 2016 | December 20, 2023 |
Denis Gascon (former Chairperson) | April 30, 2015 | April 29, 2022 |
Paul S. Crampton | March 19, 2010 | April 29, 2022 |
Member | First appointed | End of final term | Chairperson |
---|---|---|---|
Leonard Martin | June 30, 1986 | October 24, 1991 (resigned) | |
Barbara Reed | June 30, 1986 | October 19, 1992 (resigned) | Yes |
Max M. Teitelbaum | June 30, 1986 | April 15, 1993 (resigned) | |
Barry Strayer | June 30, 1986 | April 23, 1993 (resigned) | |
Marc Noël | May 28, 1993 | June 25, 1998 | |
Marshall E. Rothstein | May 28, 1993 | January 22, 1999 | |
William P. McKeown | April 1, 1993 | September 1, 2002 (retired) | Yes + re-appointed |
Sandra J. Simpson | June 10, 1993 | June 9, 2014 | Yes + re-appointed |
Marc Nadon | December 16, 1998 | December 14, 2001 | |
Allan Lutfy | June 8, 1999 | September 19, 2001 | |
François Lemieux | February 26, 2002 | February 25, 2009 (retired) | |
Eleanor R. Dawson | February 26, 2002 | December 28, 2009 | |
Pierre Blais | October 29, 2002 | February 20, 2008 | |
Edmond P. Blanchard | October 29, 2002 | November 25, 2012 | |
Johanne Gauthier | November 26, 2009 | October 21, 2011 | |
Robert M. Mainville | November 26, 2009 | June 18, 2010 | |
André F.J. Scott | September 29, 2011 | January 31, 2014 | |
Donald J. Rennie | May 3, 2012 | February 27, 2015 | Yes |
Robert L. Barnes | April 30, 2015 | April 29, 2021 |
Matters before the Tribunal are usually of national interest. The Tribunal hears cases that deal with such matters as business mergers; abuse of dominant position; agreements between competitors; refusal to comply; price maintenance; other restrictive trade practices; deceptive marketing practices; specialization agreements; delivered pricing; foreign judgments, law, and directives that "adversely affect economic activity in Canada;" and refusals to supply by foreign suppliers. [2]
As of 2012, the Competition Tribunal had adjudicated only six contested merger cases. [4] The vast majority of cases are resolved by the Competition Bureau prior to reaching the Tribunal. [4]
In 2015, the Tribunal ruled in favour of the Canadian Real Estate Association in a case brought by the Bureau. [9] The Bureau argued that a number of restrictions imposed by the CREA on private sellers hoping to list their homes on multiple listing service were contrary to a 2010 deal. [9] The Tribunal later scheduled a rehearing on the issue in September 2015. [10]
In the United States, antitrust law is a collection of mostly federal laws that regulate the conduct and organization of businesses to promote competition and prevent unjustified monopolies. The three main U.S. antitrust statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890, the Clayton Act of 1914, and the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914. These acts serve three major functions. First, Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits price fixing and the operation of cartels, and prohibits other collusive practices that unreasonably restrain trade. Second, Section 7 of the Clayton Act restricts the mergers and acquisitions of organizations that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly. Third, Section 2 of the Sherman Act prohibits monopolization.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is an independent agency of the United States government whose principal mission is the enforcement of civil (non-criminal) antitrust law and the promotion of consumer protection. The FTC shares jurisdiction over federal civil antitrust enforcement with the Department of Justice Antitrust Division. The agency is headquartered in the Federal Trade Commission Building in Washington, DC.
A tribunal, generally, is any person or institution with authority to judge, adjudicate on, or determine claims or disputes—whether or not it is called a tribunal in its title. For example, an advocate who appears before a court with a single judge could describe that judge as "their tribunal." Many governmental bodies that are titled as "tribunals" are described so in order to emphasize that they are not courts of normal jurisdiction. For example, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was a body specially constituted under international law; in Great Britain, employment tribunals are bodies set up to hear specific employment disputes. In many cases, the word tribunal implies a judicial body with a lesser degree of formality than a court, in which the normal rules of evidence and procedure may not apply, and whose presiding officers are frequently neither judges, nor magistrates. Private judicial bodies are also often styled "tribunals." The word tribunal, however, is not conclusive of a body's function—for example, in Great Britain, the Employment Appeal Tribunal is a superior court of record.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) is the chief competition regulator of the Government of Australia, located within the Department of the Treasury. It was established in 1995 with the amalgamation of the Australian Trade Practices Commission and the Prices Surveillance Authority to administer the Trade Practices Act 1974, which was renamed the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 on 1 January 2011. The ACCC's mandate is to protect consumer rights and business rights and obligations, to perform industry regulation and price monitoring, and to prevent illegal anti-competitive behaviour.
Competition law is the field of law that promotes or seeks to maintain market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies. Competition law is implemented through public and private enforcement. It is also known as antitrust law, anti-monopoly law, and trade practices law; the act of pushing for antitrust measures or attacking monopolistic companies is commonly known as trust busting.
The Competition Commission was a non-departmental public body responsible for investigating mergers, markets and other enquiries related to regulated industries under competition law in the United Kingdom. It was a competition regulator under the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS). It was tasked with ensuring healthy competition between companies in the UK for the ultimate benefit of consumers and the economy.
The court system of Canada forms the country's judiciary, formally known as "The King on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.
The Combines Investigation Act, 1923, was a Canadian Act of Parliament that regulated certain anti-competitive corporate business practices. It prohibited monopolies, misleading advertising, bid-rigging, price fixing, and other means of limiting competition.
A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts in most legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.
The Competition Bureau is the independent law enforcement agency in charge of regulating competition in Canada, responsible for ensuring that markets operate in a competitive manner.
The Commerce Commission is a New Zealand government agency with responsibility for enforcing legislation that relates to competition in the country's markets, fair trading and consumer credit contracts, and regulatory responsibility for areas such as electricity and gas, telecommunications, dairy products and airports. It is an independent Crown entity established under the Commerce Act 1986. Although responsible to the Minister of Commerce and Consumer Affairs and the Minister of Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media, the Commission is run independently from the government, and is intended to be an impartial promotor and enforcer of the law.
United Kingdom competition law is affected by both British and European elements. The Competition Act 1998 and the Enterprise Act 2002 are the most important statutes for cases with a purely national dimension. However, if the effect of a business' conduct would reach across borders, the European Commission has competence to deal with the problems, and exclusively EU law would apply. Even so, the section 60 of the Competition Act 1998 provides that UK rules are to be applied in line with European jurisprudence. Like all competition law, that in the UK has three main tasks.
Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC, 312 U.S. 457 (1941), is a 1941 decision of the United States Supreme Court sustaining an order of the Federal Trade Commission against a boycott agreement among manufacturers of "high-fashion" dresses. The purpose of the boycott was to suppress "style piracy". The FTC found the Fashion Guild in violation of § 5 of the FTC Act, because the challenged conduct was a per se violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.
The judicial system of Bhutan is the purview of the Royal Court of Justice, the judicial branch of the government of Bhutan under the Constitution of 2008. The judicial system comprises the Judicial Commission, the courts, the police, the penal code, and regulations on jabmi (attorneys).
The Competition Act is a Canadian federal law governing competition in Canada. The Act contains both criminal and civil provisions aimed at preventing anti-competitive practices in the marketplace.
The Competition Act, 2002 was enacted by the Parliament of India and governs Indian competition law. It replaced the archaic The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. Under this legislation, the Competition Commission of India was established to prevent the activities that have an adverse effect on competition in India. This act extends to whole of India.
The basis of the Bahamian Law and legal system lies within the English Common Law tradition. Justices of the Supreme Court, Registrars and Magistrates are all appointed by The Governor-General acting on the advice of the Judicial and Legal Service Commission, which is composed of five individuals who are headed by the Chief Justice as their chairman. The Chief Justice and the Justices of the Court of Appeal, including the President, are appointed by the Governor-General on the recommendation of the Prime Minister after consultation with the Leader of the Opposition. Once appointed, the salaries and other terms of appointment of the Chief Justice, Justices of Appeal and Justices of the Supreme Court cannot be altered to their disadvantage. Justices of the Supreme Court can serve until the age of 65 years and, where agreed among the judge, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition, may serve until the age of 67. Justices of Appeal can serve until the age of 68 years and, where agreed among the judge, the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition, may serve until the age of 70 years. The law of The Bahamas makes provisions for the appointment of 12 Justices to the Bench of the Supreme Court, inclusive of the Chief Justice, and for five Justices of the Court of Appeal, inclusive of the President. The Chief Justice, as Head of the Judiciary, is an ex officio member of the Court of Appeal, but only sits at the invitation of the President.
The Philippine Competition Commission (PhCC) is an independent, quasi-judicial body formed to implement the Philippine Competition Act (Republic Act No. 10667). The PhCC aims to promote and maintain market competition within the Philippines by regulating anti-competition behavior. The main role of the PhCC is to promote economic efficiency within the Philippine economy, ensuring fair and healthy market competition.
Appellate Tribunal for Electricity is created as a statutory and autonomous body under the Electricity Act, 2003 to hear complaints, appeals or original petitions against the orders of the State Regulatory Commission, The Central Regulatory Commission, Joint Commission or the Adjudicating officer.