Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008

Last updated

Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008
Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
New Zealand Parliament
Royal assent 11 April 2008
Related legislation
Copyright Act 1994
Status: Current legislation

The Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008 was an act passed by the New Zealand Parliament amending the Copyright Act 1994. It received Royal Assent on 11 April 2008. [1]

Contents

Background

In 2001, [2] the Ministry of Economic Development initiated a major review of copyright law, in light of new technologies, such as media in digital form and communications via the internet.

Details

The Act makes many changes, some of which include:

Section 92A

Sections 92A in particular drew widespread opposition, including the online New Zealand Internet Blackout campaign. The Section 92A proposal was being led by Judith Tizard.

Implementation and delays

Most of the Act took effect on 31 October 2008, but section 19(2) (which deals with importing films) took effect earlier on 12 April 2008. [1]

In response to the New Zealand Internet Blackout the controversial new section 92A of the Copyright Act (inserted by section 53) has been delayed until 27 March 2009. [3] Sections 48 and 85 (which deal with public playing of communication works) do not yet have a date set when they will take effect. [1]

In response to the pullout by TelstraClear from the proposed Code of Practice for ISPs, and citing "fundamental flaws" in section 92A, the Government has shelved the section, and will be redrafting the law. [4]

Reception

The Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ), certain members of the Australasian Performing Right Association, and SKY Network Television support the Act. [5] [6]

In December 2008, the Creative Freedom Foundation started a campaign (named the New Zealand Internet Blackout) criticising changes to Section 92 included in the Act. The group claims these will introduce "guilt upon accusation". [7]

Several other organisations added their disapproval to the record, including the New Zealand Open Source Society, InternetNZ, the New Zealand Computer Society, the Telecommunications User Association of New Zealand, and the Library and Information Association of New Zealand Aotearoa. The Act was opposed by New Zealand artists, [8] technology specialists, [9] ISPs, [10] businesses, [11] media commentators, [12] librarians [13] and members of the public. [14] The nature of the law changes and the campaign against them has attracted attention internationally. [15]

Critics of the Act say that disconnecting an Internet connection – which Tizard has said is a basic human right – is a disproportionate penalty for a civil infringement. ISPs said that, if the law came into effect on 28 February 2009, they would have to cut off access and take down web pages on the basis of accusation of copyright infringement, rather than face legal action from rights-holder organisations. On 23 February 2009, the Prime Minister (John Key) announced that the law's entering into force would be delayed till 27 March 2009 to allow for a code of practice to be negotiated; and that, should the negotiations fail, the law would be 'suspended' (remain out of force indefinitely). He also stated that the stronger copyright laws, including the controversial section 92a, were required for New Zealand to be able to negotiate a free trade agreement with America. [3]

In March 2009, TelstraClear announced its withdrawal from a proposed Code of Practice for internet providers, effectively side-lining Section 92A. [16] Google has also signalled its opposition to Section 92A, warning that the amendment would 'undermine the "incredible social and economic benefits" of the internet and was disproportionate to the problem it aimed to address.' [6]

In response to the feedback received, on Monday 22 March, Prime Minister John Key announced that the Government would throw out the controversial section, and that Justice minister Simon Power would initiate a rewrite.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criticism of copyright</span> Dissenting views of copyright law

Criticism of copyright, or anti-copyright sentiment, is a dissenting view of the current state of copyright law or copyright as a concept. Critics often discuss philosophical, economical, or social rationales of such laws and the laws' implementations, the benefits of which they claim do not justify the policy's costs to society. They advocate for changing the current system, though different groups have different ideas of what that change should be. Some call for remission of the policies to a previous state—copyright once covered few categories of things and had shorter term limits—or they may seek to expand concepts like fair use that allow permissionless copying. Others seek the abolition of copyright itself.

iiNet Australian internet service provider

iiNet Limited is an Australian internet service provider and telecommunications company that sells NBN plans, 4G and 5G Home Wireless Internet and services on its ULTRA Broadband Cable, FTTB and VDSL2 networks. It also sells mobile phone sim-only plans using the Vodafone network.

Internet censorship in Australia is enforced by both the country's criminal law as well as voluntarily enacted by internet service providers. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has the power to enforce content restrictions on Internet content hosted within Australia, and maintain a blocklist of overseas websites which is then provided for use in filtering software. The restrictions focus primarily on child pornography, sexual violence, and other illegal activities, compiled as a result of a consumer complaints process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judith Tizard</span> New Zealand politician

Judith Ngaire Tizard is a former New Zealand politician, and a member of the Labour Party.

Recorded Music NZ is a non-profit trade association of record producers, distributors and recording artists who sell recorded music in New Zealand. Membership of Recorded Music NZ is open to any owner of recorded music rights operating in New Zealand, inclusive of major labels, independent labels and self-released artists. Recorded Music NZ has over 2000 rights-holders.

In the United States, internet censorship is the suppression of information published or viewed on the Internet in the United States. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects freedom of speech and expression against federal, state, and local government censorship.

The copyright law of Australia defines the legally enforceable rights of creators of creative and artistic works under Australian law. The scope of copyright in Australia is defined in the Copyright Act 1968, which applies the national law throughout Australia. Designs may be covered by the Copyright Act as well as by the Design Act. Since 2007, performers have moral rights in recordings of their work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lixtor</span>

Lixtor is an internet auction website operating in New Zealand since 2005, as a free alternative to Trade Me or Facebook Marketplace.

Graduated response is a protocol or law, adopted in several countries, aimed at reducing unlawful file sharing.

The copyright law of New Zealand is covered by the Copyright Act 1994 and subsequent amendments. It is administered by Business Law Policy Unit of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE). In June 2017, a review of the existing legislation was announced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Zealand Internet Blackout</span> 2009 New Zealand internet services protest

The New Zealand Internet Blackout was an online protest organised by the Creative Freedom Foundation NZ (CFFNZ) against changes to copyright law in New Zealand. It constituted two separate blackouts: one in 2009 to protest Section 92A of the Copyright Amendment Act 2008; and another in 2011 to protest the Copyright Amendment Act 2011, although the CFFNZ did not take part in this one.

Internet censorship in Ireland is a controversial issue with the introduction of a graduated response policy in 2008 followed by an effort to block certain file sharing sites starting in February 2009. Beyond these issues there are no government restrictions on access to the Internet or credible reports that the government monitored e-mail or Internet chat rooms. Individuals and groups could engage in the expression of views via the Internet, including by e-mail. Irish law provides for freedom of speech including for members of the press, and the government generally respects these rights in practice. An independent press, an effective judiciary, and a functioning democratic political system act jointly to ensure freedom of speech and of the press.

The French HADOPI law or Creation and Internet law was introduced during 2009, providing what is known as a graduated response as a means to encourage compliance with copyright laws. HADOPI is the acronym of the government agency created to administer it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright Act 1994</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

The Copyright Act 1994 is an Act of Parliament passed in New Zealand that, along with its various amendments, governs copyright in New Zealand. It is administered by Intellectual Property Policy Unit of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital Economy Act 2010</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Digital Economy Act 2010 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The act addresses media policy issues related to digital media, including copyright infringement, Internet domain names, Channel 4 media content, local radio and video games. Introduced to Parliament by Lord Mandelson on 20 November 2009, it received Royal Assent on 8 April 2010. It came into force two months later, with some exceptions: several sections – 5, 6, 7, 15, 16(1)and 30 to 32 – came into force immediately, whilst others required a statutory instrument before they would come into force. However some provisions have never come into force since the required statutory instruments were never passed by Parliament and considered to be "shelved" by 2014, and other sections were repealed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act 2011</span>

The Copyright Amendment Act 2011 is an Act of the Parliament of New Zealand which amends the Copyright Act 1994.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stop Online Piracy Act</span> Failed United States bill

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) was a proposed United States congressional bill to expand the ability of U.S. law enforcement to combat online copyright infringement and online trafficking in counterfeit goods. Introduced on October 26, 2011, by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), provisions included the requesting of court orders to bar advertising networks and payment facilities from conducting business with infringing websites, and search engines from linking to the websites, and court orders requiring Internet service providers to block access to the websites. The proposed law would have expanded existing criminal laws to include unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content, imposing a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

Copyright law of South Korea is regulated by the Copyright Act of 1957. It has been amended several times, with a recent 2009 revision introducing a three strikes policy for online copyright infringement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bronwyn Holloway-Smith</span> New Zealand artist and author

Bronwyn Holloway-Smith is an artist and author from Wellington, New Zealand. She holds a PhD in Fine Arts from Massey University, and is Co-Director of Public Art Heritage Aotearoa New Zealand, a research initiative based at Massey University's Toi Rauwhārangi College of Creative Arts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Oceania</span> Overview about the Internet censorship and surveillance in Oceania

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Oceania provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Oceania.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act 2008 No 27 (as at 31 October 2008), Public Act – New Zealand Legislation".
  2. "Digital Technology and the Copyright Act 1994: A Discussion Paper". MED. July 2001. Archived from the original on 26 September 2010.
  3. 1 2 "Key: We still need a new internet copyright law". NZPA. 24 February 2009. Archived from the original on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2009.
  4. "PM's Presser : Copyright to remain silent". Scoop. 23 March 2009.
  5. "Campaign to Stop File-Sharers Being "Guilty Upon Accusation" * TorrentFreak". 5 January 2009.
  6. 1 2 Pullar-Strecker, Tom (16 March 2009). "Google opposes new copyright law". The Dominion Post. Wellington. Retrieved 26 September 2011.
  7. "Creative Freedom Foundation: Home". Archived from the original on 25 August 2011. Retrieved 5 January 2009.
  8. "Section 92 of the Copyright Amendment Act assumes Guilt Upon Accusation". Creative Freedom NZ. Archived from the original on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2009.
  9. Brenda Wallace (12 November 2008). "Say good bye to freedom on the internet – was nice while it lasted". Archived from the original on 6 December 2008. Retrieved 25 February 2009.
  10. Chris Keall (21 January 2009). "ISPs: New copyright law puts business in the gun; scrap it". Archived from the original on 22 January 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2009.
  11. "Guilt Upon Accusation: New Zealand Businesses". Creative Freedom NZ. Archived from the original on 24 July 2011.
  12. Colin Jackson (7 October 2008). "Ministers: why we changed the Copyright Act".
  13. "Now librarians come out against copyright law". Computerworld. 20 January 2009. Archived from the original on 27 February 2009. Retrieved 25 February 2009.
  14. Pat Pilcher (13 January 2009). "Is the new copyright law a lose-lose proposition?". The New Zealand Herald.
  15. Mark Gibbs (20 February 2009). "New Zealand gets insane copyright law". Computerworld. Archived from the original on 2 March 2007. Retrieved 9 July 2019.
  16. Drinnan, John (12 March 2009). "TelstraClear snubs internet law agreement". The New Zealand Herald . Retrieved 26 September 2011.