Defective verb

Last updated

In linguistics, a defective verb is a verb that either lacks a conjugated form or entails incomplete conjugation, and thus cannot be conjugated for certain grammatical tenses, aspects, persons, genders, or moods that the majority of verbs or a "normal" or regular verb in a particular language can be conjugated for[ citation needed ]. That is to say, a defective verb lacks forms that most verbs in a particular language have.

Contents

English

Common defectives

The most commonly recognized[ citation needed ] defective verbs in English are auxiliary verbs—the class of preterite-present verbscan/could, may/might, shall/should, must, ought, and will/would (would being a later historical development). Though these verbs were not originally defective, in most varieties of English today, they occur only in a modal auxiliary sense. However, unlike normal auxiliary verbs, they are not regularly conjugated in the infinitive mood. Therefore, these defective auxiliaries do not accept each other as objects. Additionally, they do not regularly appear as participles.

For example, can lacks an infinitive, future tense, participle, imperative, and gerund. The missing parts of speech are instead supplied by using the appropriate forms of to be plus able to. So, while I could write and I was able to write have the same meaning, I could has two meanings depending on use, which are I was able to or I would be able to. One cannot say *I will can, which is instead expressed as I will be able to. Similarly, must has no true past tense form, this instead being supplied by had (the past tense of have), and "to have to" in the infinitive, an example of composite conjugation. The past tense expressing the obligatory aspect of must is expressed as "had to", as in He had to go. "Must have", on the other hand, expresses probability or likelihood in modern English; for example, "If that's thunder, there must have been lightning."

Some verbs are becoming more defective as time goes on; for example, although might is etymologically the past tense (preterite) of may, it is no longer generally used as such (for example, *he might not go [lower-alpha 1] to mean "he was forbidden to go"). Similarly, should is no longer used as the past of shall, but with a separate meaning indicating possibility or moral obligation. (However, the use of the preterite form should as a subjunctive form continues, as in If I should go there tomorrow, ..., which contrasts with the indicative form I shall go there tomorrow.) The defective verb ought was etymologically the past tense of owe (the affection he ought his children), but it has since split off, leaving owe as a non-defective verb with its original sense and a regular past tense (owed).

Beyond the modal auxiliaries, beware is a fully defective verb in current Modern English: its only, unmarked form is regularly used (in simple aspect, active voice) in the infinitive (I must beware of the dog), imperative (Beware of the dog, [Let the] buyer beware) and subjunctive (She insists that he beware of the dog), but too much of the finite indicative mood is formally lacking (all simple past *bewared, one simple present *bewares, all aspects *am bewaring, etc.). The word begone is similar: any usage other than as an imperative is highly marked. Another defective verb is the archaic quoth, a past tense which is the only surviving form of the verb quethe, "to say" (related to bequeath).

Impersonal verbs

Impersonal verbs such as to rain and to snow share some characteristics with the defective verbs in that forms such as I rain or they snow are not often found; however, the crucial distinction is that impersonal verbs are "missing" certain forms for semantic reasons—in other words, the forms themselves exist and the verb is capable of being fully conjugated with all its forms (and is therefore not defective) but some forms are unlikely to be found because they appear meaningless or nonsensical.

Nevertheless, native speakers can typically use and understand metaphorical or even literal sentences where the "meaningless" forms exist, such as I rained on his parade or She doesn't frost cakes, she snows them.

Contrast the impersonal verb rain (all the forms of which exist, even if they sometimes look semantically odd) with the defective verb can (only I can and I could are possible). In most cases, a synonym for the defective verb must be used instead (for example, "to be able to"). (The forms with an asterisk * are impossible, at least with respect to the relevant sense of the verb; these phonemes may by coincidence be attested with respect to a homograph [as with "canning" = "the act of preserving and packaging in cans"].)

I rain I can I am able to
I rained I could I was able to
I am raining *I am canning *I am being able to
I have rained *I have could I have been able to
to rain *to can to be able to

Arabic

In Arabic, defective verbs are called أفعال جامدةʾafʿāl jāmidah (lit., 'solid verbs'). These verbs do not change tense, nor do they form related nouns. A famous example is the verb لَيْسَ⁩ laysa'it is not', though it is not the only auxiliary verb that exhibits this property. Some Arabic grammarians argue that دَامَ⁩ dāma (as an auxiliary verb) is also completely defective; those who dispute this claim still consider it partially defective. Some other partially defective verbs are فَتِئَ⁩ fatiʔa and زَالَ⁩ zāla, which have neither an imperative form nor an infinitive form when used as auxiliary verbs.

Catalan

In Catalan, defective verbs are usually defective for semantic reasons. [1] Due to their impersonal nature, haver-hi and caldre are only used in the third person. The implicit repetition intrinsic to the meaning of soler results in it only having forms in the present and imperfect tenses. Verbs pertaining to meteorological phenomena, such as ploure, can only be conjugated in the third person singular, although a third person plural form is also possible when used with a metaphorical sense. Additionally, lleure is used only in the third person, while dar lacks present tense forms, with the exceptions of the first person plural and second person plural. Defective verbs in Catalan can generally also be used in the impersonal forms of the infinitive, gerund, and past participle.

Finnish

At least one Finnish verb lacks the first infinitive (dictionary/lemma) form. In Finnish, "kutian helposti" ("I'm sensitive to tickling") can be said, but for the verb "kutian" (here conjugated in singular first person, present tense) there is no non-conjugated form. Hypothetically, the first infinitive could be "kudita", but this form is not actually used. Additionally, the negative verb (ei, et, en, emme...) has neither an infinitive form nor a 1st person singular imperative form.

French

There are several defective verbs in French.

Impersonal verbs, such as weather verbs, function as they do in English.

German

In contemporary German, the verb erkiesen, which means "to choose/elect" (usually referring to a person chosen for a special task or honour), is only used in the past participle (erkoren) and, more rarely, the past tense (ich erkor etc.). All other forms, including the infinitive, have long become obsolete and are now unknown and unintelligible to modern speakers. It remains commonplace in the closely related Dutch language as verkiezen; for example, Verkiezingen in Nederland (Elections in the Netherlands).

Classical Greek

"No single Greek verb shows all the tenses", and "most verbs have only six of" the nine classes of tense-systems, and "[s]carcely any verb shows all nine systems". [3]

The verb χρή (khrē, 'it is necessary'), only exists in the third-person-singular present and imperfect ἐχρῆν / χρῆν (ekhrēn / khrēn, 'it was necessary').

There are also verbs like οἶδα (oida, 'I know'), which use the perfect form for the present and the pluperfect (here ᾔδη ēidē, 'I was knowing') for the imperfect.

Additionally, the verb εἰμί (eimi, 'I am') only has a present, a future and an imperfect – it lacks an aorist, a perfect, a pluperfect and a future perfect.

Hindustani

In Hindustani (Hindi and Urdu) all the verbs except the verb hona (to be) lack the following conjugations.

  1. Indicative Mood
    • Present
    • Imperfect
  2. Presumptive Mood
  3. Subjunctive Mood
    • Present

The comparison between the conjugations of hona (to be) and the conjugations of all other verbs are shown in the table below:

non-aspectual conjugations of "honā (to be)"
moodtensesingularplural
1P - mãĩ2P - tum13P - yah/ye, vah/vo1P - ham1
2P - āp1
2P - tū3P - ye, ve/vo
indicativepresenthū̃hohaihãĩ
perfecthuāhuīhuehuīhuāhuīhuehuī̃
imperfectthāthīthethīthāthīthethī̃
future2 - 1hoū̃gāhoū̃gīhoogehoogīhoegāhoegīhoẽgehoẽgī
future2 - 2hū̃gāhū̃gīhogehogīhogāhogīhõgehõgī
presumptivepresent
past
subjunctivepresenthū̃hoho
futurehoū̃hoohoehoẽ
contrafactualpasthotāhotīhotehotīhotāhotīhotehotī̃
imperativepresenthoohohoiye
futurehonāhoiyohoiyegā
non-aspectual conjugations of "karnā (to do)"
moodtensesingularplural
1P - mãĩ2P - tum13P - yah/ye, vah/vo1P - ham1
2P - āp1
2P - tū3P - ye, ve/vo
indicativepresent
perfectkiyākiyekiyākiyekī̃
imperfect
future2 - 1karū̃gākarū̃gīkarogekarogīkaregākaregīkarẽgekarẽgī
future2 - 2
presumptivepresent
past
subjunctivepresent
futurekarū̃karokarekarẽ
contrafactualpastkartākartīkartekartīkartākartīkartekartī̃
imperativepresentkarokarkariye
futurekarnākariyokariyegā
1the pronouns tum, āp, and ham can be used in both singular and plural sense, akin to the English pronoun you, although the singular use of ham is proscribed.
2 the indicative future 1 and future 2 conjugations are synonymous, however, only the future 2 conjugations can be used as the presumptive mood copula.

Some verbs in Hindustani which have monosyllabic verb roots ending in the vowels /i/, /ī/ or /e/ are defective because they have the second person intimate and formal future imperative conjugations which are uncommon to native speakers of Hindustani and are almost rarely used. The * mark before some intimate imperative forms below shows those rarely used forms. [4]

VerbsInfinitiveIntimateNeutralFormal
PresentFuturePresentFuturePresentFuture
dokarnākarkariyokarokarnākījiyekījiyegā
givedenādediyododenādījiyedījiyegā
drinkpīnā*pīiyopiyopīnāpījiyepījiyegā
livejīnā*jīiyojiyojīnā*jīiye*jīiyegā
sewsīnā*sīiyosiyosīnā*sīiye*sīiyegā

Hungarian

Some Hungarian verbs have either no subjunctive forms or forms which sound uncommon to native speakers; for example, csuklik'hiccup'. See also a short summary about them in the English-language Wiktionary.

Irish

Arsa'says' can be used only in the past or present tense. The copula is lacks a future tense, an imperative mood, and a verbal noun. It has no distinct conditional tense forms either, but conditional expressions are possible, expressed using past tense forms; for example Ba mhaith liom é, which can mean both 'I liked it' and 'I would like it'. The imperative mood is sometimes suppletively created by using the imperative forms of the substantive verb . Future tense forms, however, are impossible and can only be expressed periphrastically.

There is also dar'[it] appears, seems', a temporally independent verb that always appears in combination with the preposition le.

Dar liom go bhfuil ceart agat.

Dar liom

It seems to me

go

that

bhfuil

be.PRES.DEP.INDIR.REL

ceart

correct

agat.

at.2SG

{Dar liom} go bhfuil ceart agat.

{It seems to me} that be.PRES.DEP.INDIR.REL correct at.2SG

"It seems to me that you are right."

Korean

Korean has several defective verbs. (말다malda'to stop or desist') may only be used in the imperative form or in the hortative form, after an 'action verb + (ji)' construction. Within this scope it can still conjugate for different levels of politeness, such as 하지 마!Haji ma!'Stop that!', in contrast with 하지 마십시오Haji masipsiyo'Please, don't do that'. Also, 데리다derida'to bring/pick up someone' is only used as 데리고derigo'bringing X and...', 데리러derireo'in order to pick up', or 데려deryeo'to pick up' in some compound forms.

Latin

Latin has defective verbs that possess forms only in the perfect tense; such verbs have no present tense forms whatsoever. These verbs are still present in meaning. For example, the first-person form odi ("I hate") and infinitive odisse ("to hate") appear to be the perfect of a hypothetical verb *odo/odio, but in fact have a present-tense meaning. Similarly, the verb memini, meminisse is conjugated in the perfect, yet has a present meaning:

meminī
meministī
meminit
meminimus
meministis
meminērunt

Instead of the past-tense "I remembered", "you remembered", etc., these forms signify the present-tense "I remember", "you remember", etc. Latin defective verbs also possess regularly formed pluperfect forms with simple past tense meanings and future perfect forms with simple future tense meanings. Compare deponent verbs, which are passive in form but active in meaning.

The verb coepī, coepisse, which means "to have begun" or "began", is another verb that lacks a present tense system. However, it is not present in meaning. The verb incipiō, incipere ("I begin," "to begin") is used in the present tense instead. This is not a case of suppletion, however, because the verb incipere can also be used in the perfect.

The verbs inquit and ait, both meaning "said", cannot be conjugated through all forms. Both verbs lack numerous inflected forms, with entire tenses and voices missing altogether.

Malayic

Many Malayic languages, including Malay and Indonesian, have many defective verbs. Defective verbs in the related Besemah language (South Barisan Malay), for example, has been explained by McDonnell (2016). He is not directly using the term "defective verb", but instead "verb root productivity". [5]

Verb inflection in Besemah
Bound rootVerbal rootNominal root
TransitiveIntransitive
Root*capakiduptanamgunting
"to discard""to live""to plant""scissors"
Freeiduptanamgunting
"live, on""plant ( pv )""scissors"
-ancapakantanamanguntingan
"discarded""plant""cut"

Polish

Widać'it is evident' and słychać'it is audible' are both highly defective in Polish. The only forms of these verbs that exist are the infinitives. They both work as impersonal verbs in a visible or audible situation that does not require another verb (although may have one), and they have no distinction between singular and plural. For example Widać blask wśród drzew'A glow is visible among the trees' or Jego głos słychać w całym domu'His voice can be heard in the whole house'.

Portuguese

A large number of Portuguese verbs are defective in person; that is, they lack the proper form for one of the pronouns in some tense. The verb colorir ("to color") has no first-person singular in the present, thus requiring a paraphrase, like estou colorindo ("I am coloring") or the use of another verb of a similar meaning, like pintar ("to paint").

Russian

Some Russian verbs are defective, in that they lack a first person singular non-past form: for example, победить'to win', убедить'to convince', дудеть'to play the pipe'. These are all verbs whose stem ends in a palatalized alveolar consonant; [6] they are not a closed class, but include in their number neologisms and loanwords such as френдить(to friend, as on a social network). [7] Where such a verb form would be required, speakers typically substitute a synonymous verb (Я выиграю), or use a periphrastic construction involving nominalization and an additional verb (Я одержу победу). Also the word могу'I'll be able to, I'll manage to' is used: (Я) смогу победить, (я) смогу убедить. [ citation needed ]

Many experiential verbs describe processes that humans cannot generally undergo, such as пригореть'to be burnt, regarding food', куститься'to grow in clusters', and протекать'to seep'—are ordinarily nonsensical in the first or second person. As these forms rarely appear, they are often described as "defective" in descriptions of Russian grammar. [8] However, this is a semantic constraint rather than a syntactic one; compare the classic nonsensical-but-grammatical sentence Colorless green ideas sleep furiously , or more directly, the English phrase I am raining. First and second person forms of these verbs do see use in metaphor and poetry. [9]

Spanish

Spanish defective verbs generally use forms with stem endings that begin with -i. [10] The verbs are not commonly used.

The following two verbs used to be defective verbs but are now normally conjugated.

Swedish

The auxiliary verb måste'must' lacks an infinitive, except in Swedish dialects spoken in Finland. Also, the verb is unique in that the form måste serves as both a present 'must' and past 'had to' form. The supine måst is rare.

Turkish

While the Turkish copula is not considered a verb in modern Turkish, it originated as the defective verb *imek — which is now written and pronounced as a suffix of the predicate. *İmek and the suffixes derived from it exist in only a few tenses; it is replaced by negative değil in the tenses originally supplied by *imek, and remaining forms by olmak'to become' otherwise.

The verb can be conjugated only in certain tenses: past idi, inferential perfective imiş, conditional ise, and (non-finite) personal past participle idük (usable with possessive suffixes, notice the form was irregular).

Ukrainian

Ukrainian Verbs ending in -вісти (for example, розповісти'to tell PFV' and відповісти'to answer PFV') lack imperative mood forms; imperfective verbs are used instead (for example, відповідай).

Welsh

Welsh has several defective verbs, a number of which are archaic or literary. Some of the more common ones in everyday use include dylwn ("I should/ought"), found only in the imperfect and pluperfect tenses, meddaf ("I say"), found only in the present and imperfect, and geni ("to be born"), which only has a verb-noun and impersonal forms; for example, Ganwyd hi (She was born, literally "one bore her"). Common defective verbs in the spoken language are eisiau (pronounced, and often spelt, as isio or isie) and angen which mean 'to want' and 'to need' respectively; both are in fact nouns but are used in speech as if they were verb-nouns though they do not take the preceding yn, compare dw i'n canu 'I sing' vs. dw i eisiau 'I want'. The literary language would use these as nouns and not as defective verbs; for example, mae eisiau arnaf 'I want', literally 'there is a want on me'.

See also

Notes

  1. This article uses asterisks to indicate ungrammatical examples.

Related Research Articles

In linguistics and grammar, conjugation has two basic meanings. One meaning is the creation of derived forms of a verb from basic forms, or principal parts.

In grammar, a future tense is a verb form that generally marks the event described by the verb as not having happened yet, but expected to happen in the future. An example of a future tense form is the French aimera, meaning "will love", derived from the verb aimer ("love"). The "future" expressed by the future tense usually means the future relative to the moment of speaking, although in contexts where relative tense is used it may mean the future relative to some other point in time under consideration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish verbs</span> Verbs in the Spanish language

Spanish verbs form one of the more complex areas of Spanish grammar. Spanish is a relatively synthetic language with a moderate to high degree of inflection, which shows up mostly in Spanish conjugation.

Verbs in the Finnish language can be divided into six main groups depending on the stem type, both for formal analysis and for teaching the language to non-native speakers. All six types have the same set of personal endings, but the stems assume different suffixes and undergo (slightly) different changes when inflected.

The imperfect is a verb form that combines past tense and imperfective aspect. It can have meanings similar to the English "was walking" or "used to walk". It contrasts with preterite forms, which refer to a single completed event in the past.

This article describes the conjugation and use of verbs in Slovene. Further information about the grammar of the Slovene language can be found in the article Slovene grammar.

In language learning, the principal parts of a verb are those forms that a student must memorize in order to be able to conjugate the verb through all its forms. The concept originates in the humanist Latin schools, where students learned verbs by chanting them in the four key forms from which all other forms can be deduced, for example:

In French, a verb is inflected to reflect its mood and tense, as well as to agree with its subject in person and number. Following the tradition of Latin grammar, the set of inflected forms of a French verb is called the verb's conjugation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish conjugation</span> Conjugation of verbs in the Spanish language

This article presents a set of paradigms—that is, conjugation tables—of Spanish verbs, including examples of regular verbs and some of the most common irregular verbs. For other irregular verbs and their common patterns, see the article on Spanish irregular verbs.

In French grammar, verbs are a part of speech. Each verb lexeme has a collection of finite and non-finite forms in its conjugation scheme.

French conjugation refers to the variation in the endings of French verbs (inflections) depending on the person, tense and mood. Most verbs are regular and can be entirely determined by their infinitive form however irregular verbs require the knowledge of more than just the infinitive form known as the principal parts of which there are seven in French. With the knowledge of these seven principal parts of a verb one can conjugate almost all French verbs. However, a handful of verbs, including être, are highly irregular and the seven principal parts are not sufficient to conjugate the verb fully.

German verbs are conjugated depending on their use: as in English, they are modified depending on the persons (identity) and number of the subject of a sentence, as well as depending on the tense and mood.

In Hebrew, verbs, which take the form of derived stems, are conjugated to reflect their tense and mood, as well as to agree with their subjects in gender, number, and person. Each verb has an inherent voice, though a verb in one voice typically has counterparts in other voices. This article deals mostly with Modern Hebrew, but to some extent, the information shown here applies to Biblical Hebrew as well.

Bulgarian verbs are the most complicated part of Bulgarian grammar, especially when compared with other Slavic languages. Bulgarian verbs are inflected for person, number and sometimes gender. They also have lexical aspect, voice, nine tenses, three moods, four evidentials and six non-finite verbal forms. Because the subject of the verb can be inferred from the verb ending, it is often omitted. As there is no infinitive in contemporary Bulgarian, the basic form of a verb is its present simple tense first person singular form.

This article deals with the grammar of the Udmurt language.

Tense–aspect–mood or tense–modality–aspect is a group of grammatical categories that are important to understanding spoken or written content, and which are marked in different ways by different languages.

This article discusses the conjugation of verbs in a number of varieties of Catalan, including Old Catalan. Each verbal form is accompanied by its phonetic transcription. Widely used dialectal forms are included, even if they are not considered standard in either of the written norms: those of the Institut d'Estudis Catalans and the Acadèmia Valenciana de la Llengua. Other dialectal forms exist, including those characteristic of minor dialects such as Ribagorçan and Algherese and transitional forms of major dialects.

Portuguese verbs display a high degree of inflection. A typical regular verb has over fifty different forms, expressing up to six different grammatical tenses and three moods. Two forms are peculiar to Portuguese within the Romance languages:

Hindustani verbs conjugate according to mood, tense, person, number, and gender. Hindustani inflection is markedly simpler in comparison to Sanskrit, from which Hindustani has inherited its verbal conjugation system. Aspect-marking participles in Hindustani mark the aspect. Gender is not distinct in the present tense of the indicative mood, but all the participle forms agree with the gender and number of the subject. Verbs agree with the gender of the subject or the object depending on whether the subject pronoun is in the dative or ergative case or the nominative case.

The conjugation of Sardinian verbs are mainly divided according to infinitives into -are, -ere, and -ire verbs in north-central dialects for regular verbs, similar to the tripartite systems of Portuguese, Spanish, and Italian. In southern dialects, these infinitives above change to -ai, -i, and -iri, respectively. Irregular verbs also exist as well. Many Sardinian conjugated forms were similar and conservative phonologically to Classical Latin, although the number of tenses were greatly reduced and the remaining tenses rely on periphrasis.

References

  1. "Morfologia flexiva" (PDF). IEC. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-02. Retrieved 2011-10-04.
  2. Girodet, Jean. Dictionnaire du bon français, Bordas, 1981. ISBN   2-04-010580-8,
  3. Smyth, Herbert Weir (1956) [1920]. Greek Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. pp. 108–109. ISBN   0-674-36250-0. §§362, 368a
  4. Poornima, Shakthi (2012). Hindi Aspectual Complex Predicates at the Syntax-Semantics Interface (PhD thesis). University at Buffalo. ISBN   978-1-267-45782-0. ProQuest   1029863291.
  5. McDonnell, Bradley (2016). Symmetrical voice constructions in Besemah: a usage-based approach (PhD Dissertation). Santa Barbara: University of California Santa Barbara.
  6. Daland, Robert; Sims, Andrea D.; Pierrehumbert, Janet. Much ado about nothing: A social network model of Russian paradigmatic gaps (PDF). Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistic.
  7. Baronian, Luc; Kulinich, Elena (2012). "Paradigm gaps in Whole Word Morphology". Irregularity in Morphology (and Beyond).
  8. "Репетитор по английскому языку в Санкт-Петербурге" (in Russian).
  9. Tatiana (2010-10-13). "Russian defective verbs". Archived from the original on 2 November 2014.
  10. 1 2 Butt, John. A New Reference Grammar to Modern Spanish. 5th Edition. p. 175.

Further reading