Electoral reform in Virginia

Last updated

Electoral reform in Virginia refers to efforts to change the electoral system in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia has undergone much electoral change since its settling in 1607, many of which were required by federal legislation. However, it remains a relatively conservative state in this respect compared to California and others which have experimented with various alternative systems.

Contents

Direct election of U.S. Senators

Originally, U.S. Senators were chosen by the Virginia General Assembly. On February 19, 1914, legislation was introduced in the Virginia House of Delegates calling for the direct election of United States senators by the voters of Virginia. [1] This followed enactment of the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution on April 8, 1913. Virginia had not voted to ratify the amendment.

Ballot access

There have been many changes designed to make the electoral system more favorable to third parties. These included allowing write-in ballots in U.S. presidential elections. In 1998, SB 316 was passed, changing the number of signatures required for ballot access as follows: [2]

Currently, the ballot access requirements are as follows: [3]

Voting system changes

In 2003, FairVote's analysis of Virginia's voting systems determined that amendments to the Constitution of Virginia might be required to implement instant runoff voting in statewide executive elections. [4] § 24.2-673 of the Code of Virginia appears to require use of the plurality system in local executive office elections [5]

HB 2739, a bill to implement instant runoff voting statewide, was introduced by Del. William K. Barlow in 2003 but stricken at his request. [6] In 2004, Barlow introduced HB 956, a bill to allow IRV on a test basis in localities; it died in committee. [7] However, Barlow remained confident that "instant runoff is going to happen soon". [8] Virginians for Instant Runoff Voting organized in 2006 and launched plans to implement the system in more student government elections. [9] IRV is used in single-winner student government elections at the University of Virginia, as promulgated in III(G)(3) of the Spring 2007 University Board of Elections Rules and Regulations. [10] UVA's use of the system predates VIRV's formation.

Bills to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact were introduced in 2007, [11] [12] but they died in committee. A bill to study Virginia's methods of allocating electoral votes also died in committee. [13] Virginia was considered a swing state in the 2012 U.S. Presidential election.

Approval voting appears to be prohibited by laws defining an "overvote" as follows: "'Overvote' means a ballot on which a voter casts a vote for a greater number of candidates or positions than the number for which he was lawfully entitled to vote and no vote shall be counted with respect to that office or issue". [14]

Presently, constitutional plurality is required for statewide executive offices, single transferable vote (STV) can be implemented for state House and Senate elections by appropriate legislation, and local governments can implement single transferable vote for their local legislatures and for school board elections.

Balloting methods

2007 also saw increased interest in voter verified paper ballots and other measures to regulate electronic voting machines. A bill to establish a pilot project to audit electronic equipment died in committee. [15] HB 2707 was passed, requiring the phaseout of direct recording electronic devices and prohibiting wireless communication with voting machines. [16] Voting equipment that has been used in Virginia includes Marksense tabulators and DRE.

Absentee ballot rights have been expanded in recent years as well. However, a bill to grant absentee ballots without requiring an excuse (e.g. having to work/commute at least 11 hours between 6 AM and 7 PM) was defeated in 2006 [17] and again in 2007, [18] as was a bill to allow pregnant women to vote absentee. [19] One of the following excuses is required: [20]

The voting age of 18 set by Article II, Section 1 of Constitution of Virginia.

Initiative and referendum

Referendums can be submitted to the people only when authorized by statute or charter. [21] The code specifies numerous types of referendums that voters may petition for, such as a referendum to abolish a county police force. [22] With those exceptions, however, voters cannot propose their own referendums. In 1914, an I&R bill was passed by the House of Delegates but failed in the Senate. [23] The Hampton, Virginia city charter has an I&R provision, however.

Redistricting

Redistricting is overseen by the Joint Reapportionment Committee consisting of House and Senate Privileges and Elections Committee members appointed by those committees' chairs. Democrats controlled the Virginia General Assembly for decades, but Republicans gained control at the close of the 20th century [24] and have used their power to gerrymander districts in their favor, just as the Democrats did. Proposals to establish a redistricting commission or put redistricting in the hands of retired judges have failed. In 2007, a bill was introduced to draw district lines on the basis of political subdivisions and to ban the consideration of incumbency; this bill died in committee. [25] On November 3, 2020, Virginians overwhelmingly approved a ballot referendum, 2020 Virginia Question 1, establishing a bipartisan redistricting commission.

Prospects for future reform

Any statewide electoral reform bill must be approved by Privileges and Elections committees in the Virginia House of Delegates [26] and Virginia Senate. [27] Lacey Putney, chair of the House committee, has been reluctant to embrace major changes to the system. Important players in the electoral reform movement include Virginia resident and former Libertarian Party national chair Bill Redpath and others associated with FairVote.

See also

Related Research Articles

Elections in the United States have rules and procedures regulating the conditions under which a candidate, political party, or ballot measure is entitled to appear on voters' ballots. As election processes are decentralized by Article I, Section 4, of the United States Constitution, ballot access laws are established and enforced by the states. As a result, ballot access processes may vary from one state to another. State access requirements for candidates generally pertain to personal qualities of a candidate, such as: minimum age, residency, and citizenship. Additionally, many states require prospective candidates to collect a specified number of qualified voters' signatures on petitions of support and mandate the payment of filing fees before granting access; ballot measures are similarly regulated. Each state also regulates how political parties qualify for automatic ballot access, and how those minor parties that do not can. Fundamental to democracy, topics related to ballot access are the subject of considerable debate in the United States.

A write-in candidate is a candidate whose name does not appear on the ballot but seeks election by asking voters to cast a vote for the candidate by physically writing in the person's name on the ballot. Depending on electoral law it may be possible to win an election by winning a sufficient number of such write-in votes, which count equally as if the person were formally listed on the ballot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in the United States</span> Political elections for public offices in the United States

In the politics of the United States, elections are held for government officials at the federal, state, and local levels. At the federal level, the nation's head of state, the president, is elected indirectly by the people of each state, through an Electoral College. Today, these electors almost always vote with the popular vote of their state. All members of the federal legislature, the Congress, are directly elected by the people of each state. There are many elected offices at state level, each state having at least an elective governor and legislature. There are also elected offices at the local level, in counties, cities, towns, townships, boroughs, and villages; as well as for special districts and school districts which may transcend county and municipal boundaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in California</span> Overview of the procedure of elections in the U.S. state of California

Elections in California are held to fill various local, state and federal seats. In California, regular elections are held every even year ; however, some seats have terms of office that are longer than two years, so not every seat is on the ballot in every election. Special elections may be held to fill vacancies at other points in time. Recall elections can also be held. Additionally, statewide initiatives, legislative referrals and referendums may be on the ballot.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in New York (state)</span> Overview of the procedure of elections in the U.S. state of New York

The results of elections in the state of New York have tended to be more Democratic-leaning than in most of the United States, with in recent decades a solid majority of Democratic voters, concentrated in New York City and some of its suburbs, including Westchester County, Rockland County and Long Island's Nassau county, and in the cities of Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, and Ithaca.

Electoral reform in Alabama refers to the efforts made to change the voting laws in the Yellowhammer State. In 2006, HB 711 was introduced to use preferential ballots for overseas military voters' it was passed by the Alabama House of Representatives. In March 2007, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments as to whether Alabama election law unfairly restricts third-party and independent candidates from the state ballot. Candidates are required to collect signatures from 3% of the total number of voters who voted in the previous gubernatorial election in order to gain ballot access. Ordinarily, such candidates would gather signatures at the polling place at the party primary, but Alabama made it more difficult by moving the deadline for signature turn-in to the date of the primary. Alabama ranks third nationally in disenfranchising formerly incarcerated citizens. One out of every 14 Alabama residents is disenfranchised. To regain the right to vote, individuals convicted of crimes of “moral turpitude” that have completed a felony sentence must apply to the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles for a Certificate of Eligibility to Register to Vote. As soon as you apply for a Pardon you automatically receive the right to vote back. This is the new rule of law and was passed through the House and the Senate due to voter disenfranchisement. In 2007, HB 192 was introduced to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, but it failed in the Constitution & Elections committee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in California</span>

Electoral reform in California refers to efforts to change election and voting laws in the U.S. state of California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in New York</span>

Electoral reform in New York refers to efforts to change the voting and election laws in New York State. In 2021, the New York State Legislature asked members of New York state through means of ballot proposals, all of which were denied by voters.

Electoral reform in Minnesota refers to efforts to change the voting and election laws.

Electoral reform in North Carolina refers to efforts to change the voting and election laws in the Tar Heel State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electoral reform in Colorado</span>

Electoral reform in Colorado refers to efforts to change the voting laws in the Centennial State.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranked-choice voting in the United States</span> Electoral system used in some cities and states

Ranked-choice voting (RCV) can refer to one of several ranked voting methods used in some cities and states in the United States. The term is not strictly defined, but most often refers to instant-runoff voting (IRV) or single transferable vote (STV).

Instant-runoff voting (IRV) is an electoral system that uses ranked voting. Its purpose is to elect the majority choice in single-member districts in which there are more than two candidates and thus help ensure majority rule. It is a single-winner version of single transferable voting. Formerly the term "instant-runoff voting" was used for what many people now call contingent voting or supplementary vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Virginia</span>

Elections in Virginia are authorized under Article I of the Virginia State Constitution, sections 5–6, and Article V which establishes elections for the state-level officers, cabinet, and legislature. Article VII section 4 establishes the election of county-level officers. Elections are regulated under state statute 24.2-102. The Virginia State Board of Elections oversees the execution of elections under state law. In a 2020 study, Virginia was ranked as the 12th easiest state for citizens to vote in.

Electoral reform in Oregon refers to efforts to change election and voting laws in the West Coast state of Oregon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Libertarian Party of Virginia</span> State affiliate of the Libertarian Party

The Libertarian Party of Virginia (LPVA) is the Virginia affiliate of the Libertarian Party. The party was originally founded in 1974 and was dissolved by the State Central Committee on September 11, 2022. Subsequently, the Virginia Libertarians quickly recreated the Libertarian Party of Virginia and received the recognition of the Libertarian National Committee. Some of the disaffected former Libertarians went on to create a new party, the Liberty Party – a party affiliated with the Association of Liberty State Parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in North Dakota</span> Overview of the procedure of elections in the U.S. state of North Dakota

Statewide elections in the U.S. state of North Dakota take place every two years. Most executive offices and all legislators are elected to four-year terms, with half the terms expiring on U.S. Presidential election years, and the other half expiring on mid-term election years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 North Dakota elections</span>

North Dakota has held two statewide elections in 2020: a primary election on Tuesday, June 9, and a general election on Tuesday, November 3. In addition, each township has elected officers on Tuesday, March 17, and each school district held their elections on a date of their choosing between April 1 and June 30.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republican efforts to restrict voting following the 2020 presidential election</span> Ongoing effort by the U.S. Republican Party

Following the 2020 United States presidential election and the unsuccessful attempts by Donald Trump and various other Republican officials to overturn it, Republican lawmakers initiated a sweeping effort to make voting laws more restrictive within several states across the country. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, as of October 4, 2021, more than 425 bills that would restrict voting access have been introduced in 49 states—with 33 of these bills enacted across 19 states so far. The bills are largely centered around limiting mail-in voting, strengthening voter ID laws, shortening early voting, eliminating automatic and same-day voter registration, curbing the use of ballot drop boxes, and allowing for increased purging of voter rolls. Republicans in at least eight states have also introduced bills that would give lawmakers greater power over election administration after they were unsuccessful in their attempts to overturn election results in swing states won by Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the 2020 election. The efforts garnered press attention and public outrage from Democrats, and by 2023 Republicans had adopted a more "under the radar" approach to achieve their goals.

The Election Integrity Act of 2021, originally known as the Georgia Senate Bill 202, is a law in the U.S. state of Georgia overhauling elections in the state. It replaced signature matching requirements on absentee ballots with voter identification requirements, limits the use of ballot drop boxes, expands in-person early voting, bars officials from sending out unsolicited absentee ballot request forms, reduces the amount of time people have to request an absentee ballot, increases voting stations or staff and equipment where there have been long lines, makes it a crime for outside groups to give free food or water to voters waiting in line in order to solicit votes, gives the Georgia General Assembly greater control over election administration, and shortens runoff elections, among other provisions.

References

  1. Legislative Moments in Virginia History Archived 2007-11-07 at the Wayback Machine , Virginia Historical Society.
  2. SB 316 Petition requirements in presidential elections.
  3. § 24.2-506. Petition of qualified voters required; number of signatures required; certain towns excepted., Code of Virginia.
  4. Fair Elections and the Law for the Commonwealth of Virginia Archived 2007-10-09 at the Wayback Machine , Elizabeth Reed, FairVote, 2003.
  5. § 24.2-673. Candidates having highest number of votes to receive certificate of election, Code of Virginia.
  6. HB 2739 Instant runoff voting to elect candidates to office.
  7. HB 956 Instant runoff voting; used to elect candidates to local governing bodies and school boards.
  8. Legislator's proposal: Vote for a first choice - and a second Archived 2006-12-03 at the Wayback Machine , Ron Capshaw, Scott County Virginia Star, January 20, 2003.
  9. Virginians for Instant Runoff Voting Archived 2007-10-25 at archive.today
  10. Spring 2007 University Board of Elections Rules and Regulations [ permanent dead link ], University of Virginia.
  11. HB 2742 Presidential elections; agreement among states to elect by National Popular Vote.
  12. SB 864 Presidential elections; agreement among states to elect by National Popular Vote.
  13. SJ 325 Electoral College votes; joint subcommittee to study method of allocating.
  14. § 24.2-802. Procedure for recount, Code of Virginia.
  15. HB 1243 Electronic voting equipment; State Board of Elections to design pilot program.
  16. HB 2707 Electronic voting equipment; requirements and recount procedures.
  17. HB 11 Absentee voting and ballot applications; no qualification for voters to use.
  18. HB 2574 Absentee voting; qualified voters may vote absentee for any reason.
  19. HB 2072 Absentee voting; requirements for pregnant women to vote absentee.
  20. Virginia Absentee Ballot Application Archived 2007-10-09 at the Wayback Machine
  21. § 24.2-684. How referendum elections called and held, and the results ascertained and certified, Code of Virginia.
  22. § 15.2-1703. Referendum to abolish county police force, Code of Virginia.
  23. Virginia Archived 2007-07-01 at the Wayback Machine , Initiative and Referendum Institute.
  24. Virginia General Assembly: Winners Exercise Raw Power Archived 2007-08-10 at archive.today , Dec. 2006.
  25. HB 1629 Redistricting advisory commission; establishment thereof, report.
  26. 2007 House of Delegates Committee Assignment
  27. Senate of Virginia 2007 Standing Committees Archived 2007-10-14 at the Wayback Machine