Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources

Last updated

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR)
Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) logo.png
AbbreviationFHIR
Organization HL7
Base standards JSON, XML, RDF
Domain Electronic health records
License CC0
Website fhir.org

The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR, pronounced "fire") standard is a set of rules and specifications for exchanging electronic health care data. It is designed to be flexible and adaptable, so that it can be used in a wide range of settings and with different health care information systems. The goal of FHIR is to enable the seamless and secure exchange of health care information, so that patients can receive the best possible care. The standard describes data formats and elements (known as "resources") and an application programming interface (API) for exchanging electronic health records (EHR). The standard was created by the Health Level Seven International (HL7) health-care standards organization.

Contents

FHIR builds on previous data format standards from HL7, like HL7 version 2.x and HL7 version 3.x. But it is easier to implement because it uses a modern web-based suite of API technology, including a HTTP-based RESTful protocol, and a choice of JSON, XML or RDF for data representation. [1] One of its goals is to facilitate interoperability between legacy health care systems, to make it easy to provide health care information to health care providers and individuals on a wide variety of devices from computers to tablets to cell phones, and to allow third-party application developers to provide medical applications which can be easily integrated into existing systems. [2]

FHIR provides an alternative to document-centric approaches by directly exposing discrete data elements as services. For example, basic elements of healthcare like patients, admissions, diagnostic reports and medications can each be retrieved and manipulated via their own resource URLs.

Standardization

Major Milestones in FHIR Standardization
DateVersionDescription
2011-08-18-The initial draft of FHIR, then known as Resources For Healthcare (RFH), was published on Grahame Grieve's blog in Australia [3] [4]
2011-09-11-The standard was adopted by Health Level Seven International (HL7) as a work item [4]
2014-09-300.082DSTU1 (First Draft Standard for Trial Use) official version published [5] [6]
2015-10-241.0.2DSTU2 (Second Draft Standard for Trial Use) official version published [5]
2019-10-243.0.1STU3 (Third Standard for Trial Use) [5] included coverage of a variety of clinical workflows, a Resource Description Framework format, and a variety of other updates [7]
2019-10-304.0.1Release 4 has the First Normative Content and Trial Use Developments [5] [8]
2023-03-265.0.0Release 5 [5] [9]

Architecture

Depiction of a set of interrelated FHIR resources. Each resource consists of data elements that describe the healthcare concept. FHIR resource graph.png
Depiction of a set of interrelated FHIR resources. Each resource consists of data elements that describe the healthcare concept.

FHIR is organized by resources (e.g., patient, observation). [10] Such resources can be specified further by defining FHIR profiles (for example, binding to a specific terminology). A collection of profiles can be published as an implementation guide (IG), such as The U.S. Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI). [11] The ONC anticipates finalizing USCDI v4 in July 2023. [12]

Because FHIR is implemented on top of the HTTPS (HTTP Secure) protocol, FHIR resources can be retrieved and parsed by analytics platforms for real-time data gathering. In this concept, healthcare organizations would be able to gather real-time data from specified resource models. FHIR resources can be streamed to a data store where they can be correlated with other informatics data. Potential use cases include epidemic tracking, prescription drug fraud, adverse drug interaction warnings, and the reduction of emergency room wait times. [13]

Implementations

Global (non country specific)

A number of high-profile players in the health care informatics field are showing interest in and experimenting with FHIR, including CommonWell Health Alliance and SMART (Substitutable Medical Applications, Reusable Technologies). [14]

Open source implementations of FHIR data structures, servers, clients and tools include reference implementations from HL7 in a variety of languages, SMART on FHIR [15] and HAPI-FHIR in Java. [16]

A variety of applications were demonstrated at the FHIR Applications Roundtable in July 2016. [17] The Sync for Science (S4S) profile builds on FHIR to help medical research studies ask for (and if approved by the patient, receive) patient-level electronic health record data. [18]

In January, 2018, Apple announced that its iPhone Health App would allow viewing a user's FHIR-compliant medical records when providers choose to make them available. Johns Hopkins Medicine, Cedars-Sinai, Penn Medicine, NYU-Langone Medical Center, Dignity Health and other large hospital systems participated at launch. [19]

United States

In 2014, the U.S. Health IT Policy and the Health IT Standards committees endorsed recommendations for more public (open) APIs. The U.S. JASON task force report on "A Robust Health Data Infrastructure" says that FHIR is currently the best candidate API approach, and that such APIs should be part of stage 3 of the "meaningful use" criteria of the U.S. Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act. [20] [21] [22] [23] In December 2014, a broad cross-section of US stakeholders committed to the Argonaut Project [24] which will provide acceleration funding and political will to publish FHIR implementation guides and profiles for query/response interoperability and document retrieval by May 2015. [25] It would then be possible for medical records systems to migrate from the current practice of exchanging complex Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) documents, and instead exchange sets of simpler, more modular and interoperable FHIR JSON objects. [26] The initial goal was to specify two FHIR profiles that are relevant to the Meaningful Use requirements, along with an implementation guide for using OAuth 2.0 for authentication. [27]

A collaboration agreement with Healthcare Services Platform Consortium (now called Logica) was announced in 2017. [28] Experiences with developing medical applications using FHIR to link to existing electronic health record systems clarified some of the benefits and challenges of the approach, and with getting clinicians to use them. [29]

In 2020, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued their Interoperability and Patient Access final rule, (CMS-9115-F), based on the 21st Century Cures Act. The rule requires the use of FHIR by a variety of CMS-regulated payers, including Medicare Advantage organizations, state Medicaid programs, and qualified health plans in the Federally Facilitated Marketplace by 2021. [30] Specifically, the rule requires FHIR APIs for Patient Access, Provider Directory and Payer-to-Payer exchange.

Proposed rules from CMS, such as the patient burden and prior authorization proposed rule (CMS-9123-P), [31] further specify FHIR adoption for payer-to-payer exchange. The CMS rules and Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) Cures Act Final rule (HHS-ONC-0955-AA01) [32] work in concert to drive FHIR adoption within their respective regulatory authorities.

Further, other agencies are using existing rule-making authority, not derived from the Cures Act, to harmonize the regulatory landscape and ease FHIR adoption. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Civil Rights (OCR) has proposed to update the HIPAA privacy rule (HHS–OCR–0945–AA00) [33] with an expanded right of access for personal health apps and disclosures between providers for care coordination. Unlike the CMS and ONC final rules, the OCR HIPAA privacy proposed rule is not specific to FHIR; however, OCR's emphasize on standards-based APIs clearly benefits FHIR adoption.

Brazil

In 2020, Brazil's Ministry of Health, by the IT Department of the SUS, started one of the world's largest platforms for national health interoperability, called the National Health Data Network, which uses HL7 FHIR r4 as a standard in all its information exchanges. [34]

Israel

In 2020, Israel's Ministry of Health began working towards the goal of promoting accessibility of information to patients and caregivers through the adoption of the FHIR standard in health organizations in Israel. Its first act was to create the IL-CORE work team in order to adapt the necessary components for localization and regulation in the health system in Israel. The ministry, in cooperation with the Nonprofit Organization 8400, created the FHIR IL community, whose purpose is to encourage the adoption of the standard in the Israeli healthcare system while cooperating with healthcare organizations and the industry. [35] As part of a joint activity of the Ministry and 8400, a number of projects were launched for the implementation of FHIR in health management organizations (HMO) and hospitals, alongside other projects that are being independently promoted by healthcare organizations. [36] In addition, the Ministry of Health allocated budgets to the HMOs and other organizations for the purpose of establishing organizational FHIR infrastructure. In the 2020 Eli Hurvitz Conference on Economy and Society, run by the Israel Democracy Institute it was estimated that the cost of implementing central FHIR modules of in the Israeli healthcare system is estimated at about 400 million NIS over 5 years. [37] In 2023, the Israeli government began a legislative process to promote the sharing of information between organizations in the Israeli health ecosystem for the benefit of the patient, with an emphasis on patient empowerment and reduced information blocking. [38] The proposed legislation also refers to the need to standardize the data by adopting the FHIR standard and utilizing standard terminologies, such as SNOMED-CT, both in source systems and in the data exchange process. The sharing of information will be with the patient's consent, and this consent will be given according to data buckets. [39]

Related Research Articles

Health Level Seven or HL7 is a range of global standards for the transfer of clinical and administrative health data between applications. The HL7 standards focus on the application layer, which is "layer 7" in the Open Systems Interconnection model. The standards are produced by Health Level Seven International, an international standards organization, and are adopted by other standards issuing bodies such as American National Standards Institute and International Organization for Standardization. There are a range of primary standards that are commonly used across the industry, as well as secondary standards which are less frequently adopted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electronic health record</span> Digital collection of patient and population electronically stored health information

An electronic health record (EHR) is the systematized collection of patient and population electronically stored health information in a digital format. These records can be shared across different health care settings. Records are shared through network-connected, enterprise-wide information systems or other information networks and exchanges. EHRs may include a range of data, including demographics, medical history, medication and allergies, immunization status, laboratory test results, radiology images, vital signs, personal statistics like age and weight, and billing information.

Continuity of Care Record (CCR) is a health record standard specification developed jointly by ASTM International, the Massachusetts Medical Society (MMS), the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and other health informatics vendors.

The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) is an XML-based markup standard intended to specify the encoding, structure and semantics of clinical documents for exchange. In November 2000, HL7 published Release 1.0. The organization published Release 2.0 with its "2005 Normative Edition."

The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) was an independent, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization with the public mission of accelerating adoption of robust, interoperable health information technology in the United States. The Commission certified electronic health record technology (EHR) from 2006 until 2014. It was approved by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as an Authorized Testing and Certification Body (ONC-ATCB). The CCHIT Certified program is an independently developed certification that includes a rigorous inspection of an EHR's integrated functionality, interoperability and security using criteria developed by CCHIT's broadly representative, expert work groups. These products may also be certified in the ONC-ATCB certification program.

The ISO/TC 215 is the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) Technical Committee (TC) on health informatics. TC 215 works on the standardization of Health Information and Communications Technology (ICT), to allow for compatibility and interoperability between independent systems.

Health information technology (HIT) is health technology, particularly information technology, applied to health and health care. It supports health information management across computerized systems and the secure exchange of health information between consumers, providers, payers, and quality monitors. Based on a 2008 report on a small series of studies conducted at four sites that provide ambulatory care – three U.S. medical centers and one in the Netherlands, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) was viewed as the most promising tool for improving the overall quality, safety and efficiency of the health delivery system.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is a staff division of the Office of the Secretary, within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ONC leads national health IT efforts, charged as the principal federal entity to coordinate nationwide efforts to implement and use the most advanced health information technology and the electronic exchange of health information.

InterSystems Corporation is a privately held vendor of software systems and technology for high-performance database management, rapid application development, integration, and healthcare information systems. The vendor's products include InterSystems IRIS Data Platform, Caché Database Management System, the InterSystems Ensemble integration platform, the HealthShare healthcare informatics platform and TrakCare healthcare information system, which is sold outside the United States.

popHealth is an open-source reference implementation software tool that automates population health reporting.

The Clinical Care Classification (CCC) System is a standardized, coded nursing terminology that identifies the discrete elements of nursing practice. The CCC provides a unique framework and coding structure. Used for documenting the plan of care; following the nursing process in all health care settings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blue Button</span> System for access to personal health records

The Blue Button is a system for patients to view online and download their own personal health records. Several Federal agencies, including the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, and Veterans Affairs, implemented this capability for their beneficiaries. In addition, Blue Button has pledges of support from numerous health plans and some vendors of personal health record vendors across the United States. Data from Blue Button-enabled sites can be used to create portable medical histories that facilitate dialog among health care providers, caregivers, and other trusted individuals or entities.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, abbreviated the HITECH Act, was enacted under Title XIII of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Under the HITECH Act, the United States Department of Health and Human Services resolved to spend $25.9 billion to promote and expand the adoption of health information technology. The Washington Post reported the inclusion of "as much as $36.5 billion in spending to create a nationwide network of electronic health records." At the time it was enacted, it was considered "the most important piece of health care legislation to be passed in the last 20 to 30 years" and the "foundation for health care reform."

Medical device connectivity is the establishment and maintenance of a connection through which data is transferred between a medical device, such as a patient monitor, and an information system. The term is used interchangeably with biomedical device connectivity or biomedical device integration. By eliminating the need for manual data entry, potential benefits include faster and more frequent data updates, diminished human error, and improved workflow efficiency.

Health Level Seven International (HL7) is a non-profit ANSI-accredited standards development organization that develops standards that provide for global health data interoperability.

Health care analytics is the health care analysis activities that can be undertaken as a result of data collected from four areas within healthcare; claims and cost data, pharmaceutical and research and development (R&D) data, clinical data, and patient behavior and sentiment data (patient behaviors and preferences,. Health care analytics is a growing industry in the United States, expected to grow to more than $31 billion by 2022. The industry focuses on the areas of clinical analysis, financial analysis, supply chain analysis, as well as marketing, fraud and HR analysis.

HIE of One is a free software project developing tools for patients to manage their own health records. HIE stands for Health Information Exchange, an electronic network for sharing health information across different organizations, hospitals, providers, and patients. This is one of a growing number of tools for encrypted data exchange within the healthcare sphere.

Federal and state governments, insurance companies and other large medical institutions are heavily promoting the adoption of electronic health records. The US Congress included a formula of both incentives and penalties for EMR/EHR adoption versus continued use of paper records as part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, enacted as part of the, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Clinical data standards are used to store and communicate information related to healthcare so that its meaning is unambiguous. They are used in clinical practice, in activity analysis and finding, and in research and development.

References

  1. ↑ "Welcome to FHIR". HL7.org. 1 November 2019. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
  2. ↑ Kryszyn, Jacek; Smolik, Waldemar T.; Wanta, Damian; Midura, Mateusz; Wróblewski, Przemysław (2023). "Comparison of OpenEHR and HL7 FHIR Standards". International Journal of Electronics and Telecommunications. 69 (1): 47–52. doi:10.24425/ijet.2023.144330 . Retrieved 8 January 2024.
  3. ↑ Grahame Grieve (18 August 2011). "Resources For Health: A Fresh Look Proposal". Health Intersections. Retrieved 22 August 2019.
  4. 1 2 René Spronk (11 August 2016). "Five years of FHIR". Ringholm. Retrieved 22 August 2019.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 "All Published Versions of FHIR". hl7.org. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
  6. ↑ "HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources Specification 'FHIR™', Release 1". HL7 International. 2 February 2014. Archived from the original on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  7. ↑ "HL7 publishes a new version of its FHIR specification". Healthcare IT News. 22 March 2017. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
  8. ↑ "History - FHIR v4.0.1". hl7.org. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
  9. ↑ "Directory of published versions". hl7.org. Retrieved 10 October 2023.
  10. ↑ "Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources® (FHIR)". eCQI Resource Center.
  11. ↑ "Draft U.S. Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) and Proposed Expansion Process" (PDF). USA HHS. Retrieved 27 November 2019.
  12. ↑ "USCDI ONDEC". www.healthit.gov. Retrieved 30 May 2023.
  13. ↑ "What is FHIR? And what does it mean for Healthcare IT Monitoring?". 28 August 2015. Retrieved 28 August 2015.
  14. ↑ Dan Munro (30 March 2014). "Setting Healthcare Interop On Fire". Forbes . Retrieved 22 November 2014.
  15. ↑ "Geisinger moves to mobilize its EHR platform". mHealthNews. 11 November 2014. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  16. ↑ "Open Source FHIR implementations - HL7Wiki". Archived from the original on 20 December 2014. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  17. ↑ "Mix of Applications at Showcase to Demonstrate FHIR's Potential | David Raths | Healthcare Blogs". www.healthcare-informatics.com. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  18. ↑ "Precision medicine: Analytics, data science and EHRs in the new age". 15 August 2016. Retrieved 13 September 2016.
  19. ↑ "Apple announces solution bringing health records to iPhone". Apple Newsroom. Retrieved 9 August 2018.
  20. ↑ "EHR interoperability solution offered by key IT panels". Modern Healthcare. 16 October 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2014.
  21. ↑ "Proposed interoperability overhaul finds boosters, doubters". Modern Healthcare. 21 October 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2014.
  22. ↑ "Federal HIT Committees OK Public API Recommendations to ONC". Healthcare Informatics. 15 October 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2014.
  23. ↑ "Teams Make their Pitch for Defense EHR Contract". Health Data Management. 7 November 2014. Retrieved 8 November 2014.
  24. ↑ "HL7 Launches Joint Argonaut Project to Advance FHIR" (PDF). HL7 International. 4 December 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 26 December 2014.
  25. ↑ "Kindling FHIR". Healthcare IT News. 4 December 2014. Retrieved 6 December 2014.
  26. ↑ "Can Argonaut Project Make Exchanging Health Data Easier?". InformationWeek. 26 January 2015. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
  27. ↑ "Halamka: Expect Argonaut Deliverables by May". healthcare-informatics.com. 19 February 2015. Retrieved 28 February 2015.
  28. ↑ "HL7 Teams with Healthcare Services Platform Consortium on FHIR Development | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology". www.healthcare-informatics.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
  29. ↑ "Top Ten Tech Trends 2017: Slow FHIR: Will a Much-Hyped Standard Turbo-Charge Interoperability—Or Maybe Not Quite? | Healthcare Informatics Magazine | Health IT | Information Technology". www.healthcare-informatics.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017.
  30. ↑ "CMS Interoperability and Patient Access final rule | CMS". www.cms.gov. Retrieved 22 September 2020.
  31. ↑ "CMS Proposes New Rules to Address Prior Authorization and Reduce Burden on Patients and Providers". www.cms.gov. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
  32. ↑ "ONC 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule". www.healthit.gov. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
  33. ↑ "HHS Proposes Modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule to Empower Patients, Improve Coordinated Care, and Reduce Regulatory Burdens". www.hhs.gov. 10 December 2020. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
  34. ↑ "RNDS – Ministério da Saúde" (in Brazilian Portuguese). Retrieved 10 November 2020.
  35. ↑ "Israel Core". fhir-il-community.org. 7 August 2022. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  36. ↑ "FHIR In Israel – An Overview". outburn.co.il. 28 February 2022. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  37. ↑ "מוכנות מערכת הבריאות למצבי משבר" (PDF). idi.org.il. 16 December 2020. Retrieved 7 August 2022.
  38. ↑ "תזכיר חוק ניוד מידע בריאות, התשפ"ג-2023". www.tazkirim.gov.il. 24 January 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023.
  39. ↑ "Everything You Need To Know About The Health Data Mobility Law". outburn.co.il. 2 February 2023. Retrieved 14 February 2023.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.