Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Last updated

Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine
Федерација Босне и Херцеговине
FBIH outline.png
Location of the Federation of Bosnia and
Herzegovina (blue) within Bosnia and Herzegovina. Brčko District is light blue. a
Country Bosnia and Herzegovina
Washington Agreement 18 March 1994
Recognized as
part of Bosnia
and Herzegovina
14 December 1995
Capital
and largest city
Sarajevo
43°51′30″N18°24′50″E / 43.85833°N 18.41389°E / 43.85833; 18.41389
Official
languages
[1]
Ethnic groups
(2013)
Government Federated state
  President
Lidija Bradara
Nermin Nikšić
Legislature Parliament
House of Peoples
House of Representatives
Area
 Total
26,110.5 km2 (10,081.3 sq mi)
Population
 2013 census
2,219,220 [2]
 Density
91/km2 (235.7/sq mi)
GDP  (nominal)2022 estimate
 Total
€15.2 billion [3]
 Per capita
€7,036
Currency Convertible mark b (BAM)
Time zone UTC+1 (CET)
  Summer (DST)
UTC+2 (CEST)
Calling code +387
ISO 3166 code BA-BIH
a Formally, Brčko District is held in condominium by both parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina (namely, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska). De facto , however, it is a third entity, as it has the same powers as the Federation and Republika Srpska and is under the direct sovereignty of BiH. [4]
b Latin version

The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina [lower-alpha 1] is one of the two entities composing Bosnia and Herzegovina, the other being Republika Srpska. The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina consists of ten autonomous cantons with their own governments and legislatures.

Contents

The Federation was created by the 1994 Washington Agreement, which ended the Croat–Bosniak War within the Bosnian War, and established a constituent assembly that continued its work until October 1996.

The Federation has a capital, government, president, parliament, customs and police departments and two postal systems. It occupies about half of the land of Bosnia and Herzegovina. From 1996 until 2005 it had its own army, the Army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, later merged in the Armed Forces of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The capital and largest city is Sarajevo with 275,524 inhabitants. [5]

History

Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1997
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Bosniak-controlled areas
Croat Herzeg-Bosnia 1997 Ethnic Control Bosnia.jpg
Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1997
  Bosniak-controlled areas
  Croat Herzeg-Bosnia
Flag of the Federation from 1996 to 2007 Flag of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1996-2007).svg
Flag of the Federation from 1996 to 2007
Coat of arms of the Federation from 1996 to 2007 CoA of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1996-2007).svg
Coat of arms of the Federation from 1996 to 2007

The basis for the creation of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was laid down by the Washington Agreement of March 1994. [6] Under the agreement, the combined territory held by the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Croatian Defence Council forces was to be divided into ten autonomous cantons along the lines of the Vance-Owen plan. The cantonal system was selected to prevent dominance of one ethnic group over another. However, much of the territory Croats and Bosniaks claimed for their Federation was at that point still controlled by the Bosnian Serbs.

The Washington Agreement was implemented during the spring of 1994, by convoking a Constitutional Assembly, which on 24 June adopted and proclaimed the Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. [7]

In 1995, Bosniak forces and Bosnian Croat forces of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina defeated forces of the Autonomous Province of Western Bosnia, and this territory was added to the federation (Una-Sana Canton).

Post-war

By the Dayton Agreement of 1995 that ended the four-year war, the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina was defined as one of the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina, comprising 51% of country's area, alongside Republika Srpska. Cantons and federal structure were built rather slowly after the war. Separatist Croat Herzeg-Bosnia institutions existed and functioned parallel to Federation ones up until 1996–97, when they were phased out. On 8 March 2000, the Brčko District was formed as an autonomous district within Bosnia and Herzegovina and it was created from part of the territory of both Bosnian entities. Brčko District is now a condominium that belongs to both entities.

In 2001–2002, the Office of the High Representative (OHR) imposed amendments to the Federation's Constitution and its electoral law, in compliance with the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the political equality of the three constituent peoples (U-5/98). [8] This triggered the grievances of Bosnian Croats, who claimed they were deprived of their rights to representation as Bosniaks had come to control the majority in the upper house as well. [9] Dissatisfied Croat politicians set up a separate Croatian National Assembly, held a referendum parallel to the elections and proclaimed their self-rule in Croat-majority areas in the Federation. Their attempts ended shortly after a crackdown by SFOR and legal proceedings.

Dissatisfied with the representation of Croats in the Federation, Croat political parties insist on creating a Croat-majority federal unit instead of several cantons. SDA and other Bosniak parties strongly oppose this. In September 2010, the International Crisis Group warned that "disputes among and between Bosniak and Croat leaders and a dysfunctional administrative system have paralyzed decision-making, put the entity on the verge of bankruptcy and triggered social unrest". [10] [ dead link ] In January 2017, Croatian National Assembly stated that "if Bosnia and Herzegovina wants to become self-sustainable, then it is necessary to have an administrative-territorial reorganization, which would include a federal unit with a Croatian majority. It remains the permanent aspiration of the Croatian people of Bosnia and Herzegovina." [11]

In 2010–14 the Federation's Government was formed by SDP without the consent of major Croat political parties, leading to a political crisis.

In parallel to EU-facilitated talks on the Sejdic-Finci issue at State level, in February 2013 the US embassy supported an expert working group which presented its 188 recommendations to the FBIH House of Representatives in 2013, [12] aiming to address the costly and complex governance structures with overlapping competences between the Federation, the Cantons and the municipalities as currently entailed in the Federation Constitution. [13] The initiative was finally not adopted by the Parliament.

Following an appeal by HDZ BiH Božo Ljubić, in December 2016 the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina abolished the electoral formula for the indirect election of the Federation House of People, stating that it did not guarantee the legitimate representation of constituent peoples. [14] Notably, the ruling did not concur with an amicus curiae opinion of the Venice Commission on the same matter. Lacking legislative amendments to revise the Election Law, in Summer 2018 the Central Election Commission of Bosnia and Herzegovina provisionally enacted a new formula for the composition of the House of People, based on the minimal representation formula (one deputy per each constituent people per each canton) and on the 2013 census.

In 2022, the High Representative imposed amendments to the federal Constitution and the Election Law, implementing the Ljubic verdict. The changes also reconstructed the original balance of power between Croats and Bosniaks in the Federation, as envisioned in Washington Agreement.

In 2023, the High Representative suspended the federal Constitution for one day in order to impose a new government. This created a huge scandal and political crisis. [15] Some see this as an act of "treason". [16]

Geographic boundary

The Inter-Entity Boundary Line (IEBL) that distinguishes Bosnia and Herzegovina's two entities runs along the frontlines as they existed at the end of the Bosnian War, with adjustments (most importantly in the western part of the country and around Sarajevo), as defined by the Dayton Agreement. The total length of the IEBL is approximately 1,080 km. The IEBL is an administrative demarcation and not controlled by the military or police and there is free movement across it. [17]

Five of the cantons (Una-Sana, Tuzla, Zenica-Doboj, Bosnian Podrinje and Sarajevo) are Bosniak-majority cantons, three (Posavina, West Herzegovina and Canton 10) are Croat-majority cantons, and two (Central Bosnia and Herzegovina-Neretva) are 'ethnically mixed', meaning there are special legislative procedures for protection of the constituent peoples. [18]

A significant portion of Brčko District was also part of the Federation; however, when the district was created, it became shared territory of both entities, but it was not placed under control of either of the two, and is hence under direct jurisdiction of Bosnia and Herzegovina. [19] Currently the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina has 79 municipalities. [17]

Politics

The government and politics of the Federation are dominated by three large parties, the Bosniak Party of Democratic Action (SDA), the multi-ethnic Social Democratic Party (SDP BiH) and the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ BiH). [10]

Entity-level institutions include:

Since Bosniaks compose roughly 70.4% of the Federation's population, Croats 22.4% and Serbs just around 2%, the Parliament's House of Peoples (with equal representation for all three nationalities) is supposed to ensure that the interests of Croats, Serbs and national minorities are fairly represented during government creation and in the legislative process.

The Federation is also divided into ten highly autonomous cantons. They each have their own governments, assemblies and exclusive and shared competencies. In 2010, the Federation's Constitutional Court ruled that two Federation's ministries – the Ministry of Education and Science and the Ministry of Culture and Sports – are unconstitutional since education and culture are an exclusive competence of the cantons. [20]

Political divisions

Demographics

The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina comprises 51% of the land area of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and is home to 62.85% of the country's total population.

Federation BH Ethnic Map 1991.png
Ethnic composition in 1991 (pre-war)
Federation BH Ethnic Map 2013.png
Ethnic composition in 2013
Population of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina according to ethnic group 1991–2013 [21]
Ethnic

group

census 1991census 2013
Number%Number%
Bosniaks 1,423,59352.34%1,562,37270.40%
Croats 594,36221.85%497,88322.44%
Serbs 478,12217.58%56,5502.55%
Yugoslavs 161,9385.95%
Others62,0592.28%102,4154.61%
Total2,720,0742,219,220
 
 
Largest cities or towns in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
2013 Census [22]
Rank Canton Pop.Rank Canton Pop.
Sarajevo City Panorama.JPG
Sarajevo
Tuzla View of Tuzla.jpg
Tuzla
1 Sarajevo Sarajevo Canton 275,52411 Lukavac Tuzla Canton 44,520 Zenica2007.jpg
Zenica
Mostar (48820195732).jpg
Mostar
2 Tuzla Tuzla Canton 110,97912 Tešanj Zenica-Doboj Canton 43,063
3 Zenica Zenica-Doboj Canton 110,66313 Gradačac Tuzla Canton 41,836
4 Mostar Herzegovina-Neretva Canton 105,79714 Sanski Most Una-Sana Canton 41,475
5 Ilidža Sarajevo Canton 71,89215 Visoko Zenica-Doboj Canton 41,352
6 Cazin Una-Sana Canton 66,14916 Velika Kladuša Una-Sana Canton 40,419
7 Živinice Tuzla Canton 57,76517 Zavidovići Zenica-Doboj Canton 40,272
8 Bihać Una-Sana Canton 56,26118 Srebrenik Tuzla Canton 39,678
9 Travnik Central Bosnia Canton 53,48219 Kakanj Zenica-Doboj Canton 38,937
10 Gračanica Tuzla Canton 48,39520 Livno Canton 10 37,487

See also

Notes

  1. Serbo-Croatian: Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine (FBiH) / Федерација Босне и Херцеговине (ФБиХ), pronounced [federǎːtsijabôsneːixěrtseɡoʋineː] .

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demographics of Bosnia and Herzegovina</span>

Demographic features of the population of Bosnia and Herzegovina include population density, ethnicity, education level, health of the populace, economic status, religious affiliations and other aspects of the population.

The politics of Bosnia and Herzegovina are defined by a parliamentary, representative democratic framework, where the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, named by the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, is the head of government. Executive power is exercised by the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Legislative power is vested in both the Council of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Members of the Parliamentary Assembly are chosen according to a proportional representation system. The judiciary is independent of the executive and the legislature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dayton Agreement</span> 1995 treaty ending the Bosnian War

The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina, also known as the Dayton Agreement or the Dayton Accords, and colloquially known as the Dayton in ex-Yugoslav parlance, is the peace agreement reached at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base near Dayton, Ohio, United States, finalised on 21 November 1995, and formally signed in Paris, on 14 December 1995. These accords put an end to the three-and-a-half-year-long Bosnian War, which was part of the much larger Yugoslav Wars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republika Srpska</span> Political entity of Bosnia and Herzegovina

Republika Srpska is one of the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the other being the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is located in the north and east of the country. Its largest city and administrative centre is Banja Luka, lying on the Vrbas river, and with a population of about 138,963 people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina</span> Political divisions

The political divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina were created by the Dayton Agreement. The Agreement divides the country into two federal entities: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (FBiH) and the Republika Srpska (RS) and one condominium of the two entities named the Brčko District.

There is currently no official flag for the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The federation is part of the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The federation adopted its own flag in 1996, but the flag and associated coat of arms were deemed unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2007 and now it is considered to be a "de facto" flag. The federation has not yet adopted a new flag, anthem or coat of arms; instead the symbols of the central state are used for official purposes as a provisional solution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brčko District</span> Self-governing administrative unit in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Brčko District, officially the Brčko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina, is a self-governing administrative unit in north-eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republika Srpska (1992–1995)</span> Former proto-state

The Republika Srpska was a self-proclaimed statelet in Southeastern Europe under the control of the Army of Republika Srpska during the Bosnian War. It claimed to be a sovereign state, though this claim was only partially recognized by the Bosnian government in the Geneva agreement, the United Nations, and FR Yugoslavia. For the first six months of its existence, it was known as the Serbian Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Municipalities of Republika Srpska</span> Administrative divisions in Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Under the "Law on Territorial Organization and Local Self-Government" adopted in 1994, Republika Srpska was divided into 80 municipalities. After the conclusion of the Dayton Peace Agreement, the law was amended in 1996 to reflect the changes to the entity's borders and now provides for the division of Republika Srpska into 64 municipalities.

Four major international peace plans were proposed before and during the Bosnian War by European Community (EC) and United Nations (UN) diplomats before the conflict was settled by the Dayton Agreement in 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Demographic history of Bosnia and Herzegovina</span>

This article is about the Demographic history of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and deals with the country's documented demographics over time. For an overview of the various ethnic groups and their historical development, see Ethnic groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inter-Entity Boundary Line</span> Inter-entity line of demarcation

The Inter-Entity Boundary Line, commonly abbreviated IEBL, is the administrative line that subdivides Bosnia and Herzegovina into two entities, Republika Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The total length of the Inter-Entity Boundary Line is 1,080 km.

The Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina was amended once, in 2009, to include the outcome of the Brčko District final award. Several constitutional reforms were attempted between 2006 and 2014, to ensure its compliance with the case law of the European Convention on Human Rights in the Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina and following cases regarding ethnic- and residence-based discrimination in passive electoral rights for the Presidency and House of Peoples. None of these attempts have been successful so far, notwithstanding EU involvement and conditionality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina</span> Balkan country (1992–1998)

The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina was a state in Southeastern Europe, existing from 1992 to 1995. It is the direct legal predecessor to the modern-day state of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2006 Bosnian general election</span>

General elections were held in Bosnia and Herzegovina on 1 October 2006. They decided the makeup of Bosnia and Herzegovina's Presidency as well as national, entity, and cantonal governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seal of Republika Srpska</span> Coat of arms in Bosnia

The Seal of Republika Srpska with the description: the flag of Republika Srpska and the Cyrillic letters "РС" ("RS"), the red-blue-white tricolor are in the center of the seal, twisted with the golden Oak leaves, a traditional pre-Christian symbol sacred to most Slavs. On the edge of the seal there is an inscription Republika Srpska. The open crown of Kotromanić is shown in the bottom of the seal and the seal itself is topped with a heraldic royal crown.

The Croatian National Assembly is a political organisation of Croat political parties in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The organisation serves as a platform to coordinate political and cultural activities of different parties and stakeholders in the Croatian community and to promote the initiative to create a federal unit with Croatian majority in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proposed Croat federal unit in Bosnia and Herzegovina</span>

The Croat federal unit in Bosnia and Herzegovina, or Croat entity, also informally known as the third entity, is a proposed administrative unit in Bosnia and Herzegovina based on territorial federalism and ethnic self-determination. The proposal has been invoked by several political scientists, politicians and political parties, including the Croat National Assembly. So far it has not been discussed beyond the concept level. Since the country is divided into two entities, the Serb-dominated Republika Srpska and the Bosniak-majority Federation, Croats, as one of the three equal constitutive nations, have proposed creating a symmetrical Croat-majority territorial unit. Political advocates for such proposal argue it would ensure Croat equality and prevent electoral gerrymandering, simplify the political gridlock while dismantle overburdening administration. Opponents argue it would further divide the country on ethnic grounds thus breaching the constitutional principles, put non-Croats in a subordinate position, and lead to separatism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Bosnian general election</span>

General elections were held in Bosnia and Herzegovina on 7 October 2018. They decided the makeup of Bosnia and Herzegovina's Presidency as well as national, entity and cantonal governments. Voter turnout was 54%.

References

  1. Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Archived 5 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine . Official Gazette of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
  2. 1 2 "Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 2013 Final Results" (PDF). Sarajevo, juni 2016: BHAS. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 December 2017. Retrieved 30 June 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  3. "Database of economic indicators of RS". www.irbrs.net. Archived from the original on 18 December 2021. Retrieved 26 March 2023.
  4. "Brcko Chart". 30 August 2002. Archived from the original on 30 August 2002. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
  5. "Preliminary Results of the 2013 Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in Bosnia and Herzegovina" (PDF). Bhas.ba. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 November 2013. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
  6. "Washington Agreement (1994)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 April 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2018.
  7. "CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATION OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA". 1 March 2002. Archived from the original on 1 March 2002.
  8. "Decision on Constitutional Amendments in the Federation". 13 May 2002. Archived from the original on 13 May 2002.
  9. Bose, Sumantra: "Bosnia After Dayton: Nationalist Partition and International Intervention", Oxford University Press, 2002; p. 82
  10. 1 2 "Federation of Bosnia And Herzegovina – A Parallel Crisis". International Crisis Group. 28 September 2010. Archived from the original on 13 October 2010.[ dubious ]
  11. Rose, Eleanor: "Bosniaks Slap Down Calls for Bosnian Croat Entity" Archived 30 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine , Balkan Insight, 30 January 2017
  12. ustavnareformafbih.blogspot.com Ustavna Reforma FBIH
  13. "EC Progress Report 2013, p.6-7" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 June 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2020.
  14. Rose, Eleanor: "Bosnian Court Ruling Lends Weight to Croat Agitation" Archived 30 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine , Balkan Insight, 15 Dec 16
  15. Service, RFE/RL's Balkan. "International Envoy Imposes Amendments To Bosnian Constitution To Spur Formation Of Government, Strengthen Elections". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. Archived from the original on 1 August 2023. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  16. Sito-sucic, Daria (28 April 2023). "Regional Bosnia government formed as protesters chant 'treason'". Reuters. Archived from the original on 1 August 2023. Retrieved 1 August 2023.
  17. 1 2 Cox, Marcus (2003). "Building Democracy from the Outside : the Dayton Agreement in Bosnia and Herzegovina". In Bastian, Sunil; Luckham, Robin (eds.). Can Democracy be Designed? : the Politics of Institutional Choice in Conflict-torn Societies. London: Zed Books Ltd. pp. 253–276 [259]. ISBN   1-84277-150-7. Archived from the original on 19 July 2023. Retrieved 21 April 2018. These were required to withdraw to their respective territories, and a demilitarised Zone of Separation was created, extending for two kilometres on either side of the IEBL and heavily patrolled by international forces.
  18. Richard G. Johnson (25 February 1999). "Negotiating the Dayton Peace Accords through Digital Maps". U.S. Institute of Peace. Archived from the original on 10 January 2007. Retrieved 23 January 2007. Digital technology had matured enough by late 1995 that Dayton marked the first significant appearance of "digital maps" in diplomatic negotiations.
  19. Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, U-5/98 (Partial Decision Part 1), p. 18, Sarajevo, 29 and 30 January 2000
  20. "Odluka USBiH, Broj: U-29/09 28. septembra 2010. godine". Ustavnisudfbih.ba. Archived from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 4 January 2018.
  21. "Popis 2013 u BiH – Federacija Bosne i Hercegovine". Archived from the original on 19 July 2023. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
  22. "Census of Population, Households and Dwellings in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013" (PDF). Federal Bureau of Statistics. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 December 2013. Retrieved 3 April 2015.

Sources